Mucormycosis outbreak due to Rhizopus microsporus after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery evaluated by RAPD and MALDI-TOF Mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Rhizopus microsporus is one of the main causative agents of mucormycosis. These mycoses are mostly described as isolated cases involving uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or immunosuppressed patients. In this work we report a nosocomial outbreak of mucormycosis due to R. microsporum involving three young immunocompetent patients whom underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in a seven-month time span. PROCEDURES: During the outbreak period, a total of 32 surgeries of this type were performed in the clinic (mucormycosis prevalence of 9.375%). The three patients presented healthcare-associated Mucormycosis comprising the bone surrounding one of the fixation screws (femoral or tibial). In addition to these three strains, another three R. microsporus strains isolated in the medical center during the same period of time were included in the study. One of these fungi was isolated from a skin lesion of a kidney transplant patient while the other two strains were isolated from environmental sources. Classical, mass spectrometry-based (MALDI-TOFF) and molecular identification were performed. Genetic relatedness was established by Rep-PCR (RAPD variant) and by single-linkage cluster analysis mass spectra. Cluster analysis was performed by unweighed pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). MAIN FINDINGS: All the strains were identified as R. microsporum by the used phenotypic and genetic tools. Clinical strains fell into 2 different clusters separating the renal transplant recipient strain from the three strains isolated post ACLR surgery, which clustered together. CONCLUSIONS: The established genetic/mass spectra relatedness between the three post-surgery isolates suggests that these cases may be considered a healthcare-associated mucormycosis outbreak.

Polyclonal endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a teaching hospital from Brazil: molecular typing of decade-old strains

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections cause significant mortality and morbidity in health care settings. Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of P. aeruginosa within hospitals involve implementation of barrier methods and antimicrobial stewardship programs. However, there is still much debate over which of these measures holds the utmost importance. Molecular strain typing may help elucidate this issue. In our study, 71 nosocomial isolates from 41 patients and 23 community-acquired isolates from 21 patients were genotyped. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) was performed. Band patterns were compared using similarity coefficients of Dice, Jaccard and simple matching. Strain similarity for nosocomial strains varied from 0.14 to 1.00 (Dice); 0.08 to 1.00 (Jaccard) and 0.58 to 1.00 (simple matching). Forty patterns were identified. In most units, several clones coexisted. However, there was evidence of clonal dissemination in the high risk nursery, neurology and two surgical units. Each and every community-acquired strain produced a unique distinct pattern. Results suggest that cross transmission of P. aeruginosa was an uncommon event in our hospital. This points out to a minor role for barrier methods in the control of P. aeruginosa spread.

Polyclonal endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a teaching hospital from Brazil: molecular typing of decade-old strains

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections cause significant mortality and morbidity in health care settings. Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of P. aeruginosa within hospitals involve implementation of barrier methods and antimicrobial stewardship programs. However, there is still much debate over which of these measures holds the utmost importance. Molecular strain typing may help elucidate this issue. In our study, 71 nosocomial isolates from 41 patients and 23 community-acquired isolates from 21 patients were genotyped. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) was performed. Band patterns were compared using similarity coefficients of Dice, Jaccard and simple matching. Strain similarity for nosocomial strains varied from 0.14 to 1.00 (Dice); 0.08 to 1.00 (Jaccard) and 0.58 to 1.00 (simple matching). Forty patterns were identified. In most units, several clones coexisted. However, there was evidence of clonal dissemination in the high risk nursery, neurology and two surgical units. Each and every community-acquired strain produced a unique distinct pattern. Results suggest that cross transmission of P. aeruginosa was an uncommon event in our hospital. This points out to a minor role for barrier methods in the control of P. aeruginosa spread.(AU)

Falso diagnóstico de tuberculosis por cultivo / False diagnosis of tuberculosis by culture

Las herramientas de genotipificación intra-especie de Mycobacterium tuberculosis desarrolladas durante los años 90 no sólo dieron un impulso notable a la epidemiología de la tuberculosis, también pusieron de manifiesto un fenómeno hasta entonces soslayado en los laboratorios de tuberculosis: la contaminación cruzada de muestras. Este error consiste en la transferencia accidental de bacilos de una muestra con alta carga bacilar a la o las procesadas subsecuentemente. La consiguiente aparición de falsos cultivos positivos puede inducir al diagnóstico erróneo de tuberculosis y la instauración de tratamientos prolongados con drogas potencialmente tóxicas. Esa secuencia de errores conduce al mal manejo de los pacientes involucrados, la distracción de los recursos del sistema de salud y la distorsión de los resultados de análisis epidemiológicos. Se detectó contaminación cruzada en todos los laboratorios donde fue investigada sistemáticamente, con tasas de alrededor del 3% de los cultivos positivos. La confirmación requiere confrontar resultados bacteriológicos, clínicos, epidemiológicos y de genotipificación. Realizamos aquí una revisión de la información nacional e internacional sobre el tema y describimos las medidas recomendadas para minimizar el riesgo, vigilar la ocurrencia y evitar las consecuencias clínicas de este error de laboratorio que vulnera la certeza de un cultivo positivo.

A remarkable input to the epidemiology of tuberculosis was not the only benefit of the molecular tools developed in the early nineties for Mycobacterium tuberculosis intra-species differentiation. These genotyping methods served also to unveil specimen crosscontamination, which was until then overlooked in laboratories culturing mycobacteria. This error consists in the accidental carry-over of bacilli from a specimen with high bacterial load to that, or those, processed subsequently. The ensuing detection of falsely positive cultures can result in a wrong diagnosis of tuberculosis and the initiation of a long-lasting treatment with potentially toxic drugs. This series of errors implies the mismanagement of patients, the distraction of public health system resources, and the distortion of epidemiological data. M. tuberculosis laboratory cross-contamination was detected wherever investigated systematically, with a median rate of 3% of all positive cultures. The confirmation of this error requires a critical appraisal of bacteriological, clinical, epidemiological and genotyping results. We present here a review of national and international information on laboratory crosscontamination and describe measures recommended for minimizing the risk, surveying the occurrence, and avoiding clinical consequences of this laboratory error that raises a question on the reliability of a positive culture.