The role of pathogenic TCF12 variants in children with coronal craniosynostosis-a systematic review with addition of two novel cases.

Craniosynostosis constitutes one of the most common congenital cranial malformations, affecting approximately 6/10,0000 live births. A genetic etiology has long been known for several forms of syndromic craniosynostosis, including pathogenic variants in TWIST1 and FGFR3 in children with Saethre-Chotzen and Muenke syndrome. Over the last decade, reports of genetic aberrations in TCF12 in children with craniosynostosis have emerged, in particular in cases with premature closure of the coronal suture(s). In this study, we, therefore, systematically reviewed the rapidly growing knowledge of TCF12-related coronal craniosynostosis, clearly illustrating its high degree of genotype and phenotype variability. With the two novel cases presented, at least 113 cases of TCF12-related coronal craniosynostosis have currently been reported. By pooling data from several prospectively collected undifferentiated craniosynostosis cohorts (ntotal = 770), we estimate a prevalence of pathogenic TCF12 variants of at least 2%. Overall, pathogenic germline variants in TCF12 are relatively frequent in children with coronal craniosynostosis, accounting for ∼10-20% of TWIST1- and FGFR1/2/3-negative cases, with even higher rates for bicoronal and syndromic cases. Genetic counseling is recommended for all children with craniosynostosis, and involvement of the coronal suture(s) should precipitate TCF12 testing.

Exploring Different Management Modalities of Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis.

Craniosynostosis is an atypical skull shape characterized by the premature fusion of cranial sutures. It is one of the most common congenital anomalies encountered by craniofacial surgeons, with a prevalence of one in every 2000-2500 births. It is classified into two main types: syndromic and nonsyndromic. In syndromic, the patient presents with other abnormalities involving the trunk, face, or extremities. While in nonsyndromic the only anomy is the premature fusion, which usually involves one suture; the most common subtypes are unicoronal, sagittal, bicoronal, metopic, and lambdoid. As a consequence, premature fusion before its natural time restricts the space for the brain to grow, increases intracranial pressure, causes damage to the brain tissue, and affects the development of the child. This review comprehensively provides a detailed overview of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and aims to highlight the importance of early and accurate diagnosis, and determining the most suitable intervention, whether surgical or conservative modalities. The optimal treatment approach produces the most favorable aesthetic and functional outcomes.

Apert syndrome: neurosurgical outcomes and complications following posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.

PURPOSE: Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) has been utilized during the past 15 years to treat a variety of clinical features commonly presented by patients with Apert syndrome. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of PVDO in addressing both elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and ectopia of the cerebellar tonsils (ECT) in young Apert patients. In addition, we aimed to determine the prevalence of hydrocephalus in Apert syndrome patients who underwent PVDO. METHODS: A retrospective study was made with a cohort of 40 consecutive patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC), previously diagnosed with Apert syndrome, who underwent PVDO between 2012 and 2022, and thereafter received at least 1 year of follow-up care. Demographic data and diagnosis, along with surgical and outcome data, were verified using medical records, clinical photographs, radiologic examination, and interviews with the parents of all cohort patients. RESULTS: The average patient age when PVDO was performed was 12.91 ± 10 months. The average posterior advancement distance achieved per patient was 22.68 ± 5.26 mm. The average hospital stay per patient was 3.56 ± 2.44 days. The average absolute and relative blood transfusion volumes were 98.47 ml and 17.63 ml/kg, respectively. Although five patients (14%) presented ECT preoperatively, this condition was completely resolved by PVDO in three of these five patients. One of the three patients whose ECT had completely resolved presented syringomyelia postoperatively, requiring subsequent extra dural foramen magnum decompression. All of the remaining four patients were asymptomatic for ECT for at least 1 year of follow-up, and none of these four patients required any additional treatments to address ECT. Two patients presented hydrocephalus requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that PVDO both reduces diagnosed elevated ICP symptoms and is partially effective in treating ECT in Apert syndrome patients. Hydrocephalus in Apert syndrome is an uncommon feature. The effectiveness of PVDO in addressing hydrocephalus is uncertain.

The effect of Le Fort III procedure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with syndromic craniosynostosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC). The efficacy of the Le Fort III procedure in managing OSA in children with SC remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of Le Fort III procedure in the management of OSA in children with SC. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in children with SC and OSA diagnosed by polysomnography, which was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 1 event/h. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were those who underwent Le Fort III surgery and had both baseline polysomnography and follow-up sleep studies. Relevant clinical and demographic data were collected from all individuals who participated in the study. RESULTS: Overall, 45 children with OSA and SC were identified, with a mean age of 6.8 ± 4.7 years. Twenty-five received the Le Fort III procedure and follow-up sleep studies. The Le Fort III procedure resulted in a significant reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (6.0 [2.6, 10.1] vs 37.6 [20.9, 48.0] events/h; P < .001). However, normalization of OSA was only achieved in 1 patient (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The Le Fort III procedure is efficacious in the treatment of OSA in children with SC. However, despite the observed improvement, residual OSA following treatment remains common. CITATION: Chang Y, Zhang W, Li M, et al. The effect of Le Fort III procedure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with syndromic craniosynostosis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1301-1311.

Severe obstructive sleep apnea in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: analysis of pulse transit time.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between pulse transit time (PTT) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS), where OSA is a common problem and may cause cardiorespiratory disturbance. METHODS: A retrospective study of children (age < 18 years) with SCS and moderate-to-severe OSA (ie, obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5) or no OSA (obstructive apnea-hypopnea index < 1) who underwent overnight polysomnography. Children without SCS and normal polysomnography were included as controls. Reference intervals for PTT were computed by nonparametric bootstrap analysis. Based on reference intervals of controls, the sensitivity and specificity of PTT to detect OSA were determined. In a linear mixed model, the explanatory variables assessed were sex, age, sleep stage, and time after obstructive events. RESULTS: In all 68 included children (19 with SCS with OSA, 30 with SCS without OSA, 19 controls), obstructive events occurred throughout all sleep stages, most prominently during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and non-REM sleep stages N1 and N2, with evident PTT changes. The greatest reductions were observed 4-8 seconds after an event (P < .05). In SCS with OSA, PTT reference intervals were lower during all sleep stages compared with SCS without OSA. The highest sensitivity was observed during N1 (55.5%), and the highest specificity during REM sleep (76.5%). The lowest PTT values were identified during N1. CONCLUSIONS: Obstructive events occur throughout all sleep stages with transient reductions in PTT. However, PTT as a variable for OSA detection is limited by its sensitivity and specificity. CITATION: Yang S, van Twist E, van Heesch GGM, et al. Severe obstructive sleep apnea in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: analysis of pulse transit time. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1233-1240.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Mexican Children and Adolescents with Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the Health-Related Quality of Life in children and adolescents with non-syndromic craniosynostosis and compare it with participants without craniosynostosis. DESIGN: Non-experimental, cross-sectional design. SETTING: The assessment was done remotely and the instrument was sent via chat or email. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Participants (ages 8-17) with non-syndromic craniosynostosis (n = 27) and without craniosynostosis (n = 26). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We used an adapted version for the Mexican population of the Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents -KIDSCREEN-52. RESULTS: All scores were in the average clinical range and both groups scored similarly in all domains except those with craniosynostosis were significantly lower in the Social Support and Peers domain (rpb = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents with non-syndromic craniosynostosis reported similar Health-Related Quality of Life as the control group, except for the Social Support domain, which should be investigated in future studies.

Prevalence of craniosynostosis in Finland, 1987-2010: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis is a prevalent craniofacial malformation in Finland; however, comprehensive population-based epidemiological data are limited. This study aimed to estimate the total and birth prevalence of craniosynostosis in Finland from 1987 to 2010 and examine temporal trends. METHODS: We collected the data from nationwide registers maintained by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and Statistics Finland, as well as treating hospitals, encompassing live births, stillbirths, terminations for fetal anomalies, and infant deaths with suspected or diagnosed craniosynostosis or skull deformation. A craniofacial surgeon and a clinical geneticist reviewed 1878 medical records for diagnostic confirmation. RESULTS: Out of 877 craniosynostosis cases, 83% were single-suture synostoses (all live births), 10% craniosynostosis syndromes, and 7% multisutural non-syndromic synostoses. Live birth prevalence from 1987 to 2010 was 6.0/10,000 live births, ranging from 5.0/10,000 in 1987 to 7.5/10,000 in 2010. Total prevalence, including live births, stillbirths, and terminations, varied from 5.0/10,000 in 1987 to 8.0/10,000 in 2010. Sagittal synostosis was the most common synostosis, with a prevalence of 3.9/10,000 live births, followed by metopic (0.6/10,000), unicoronal (0.4/10,000), and unilambdoid (0.1/10,000) synostoses. CONCLUSIONS: The total combined prevalence of all craniosynostosis types significantly increased driven by a nonsignificant rise across all subgroups and a significant increase in the syndrome group. In live births increase was significant only within the syndrome subgroup, primarily due to an increase in Muenke syndrome patients. The rising prevalence of syndromes necessitates further investigation. Contrasting with trends in Europe, Australia, and the USA, Finland showed no significant increase in metopic craniosynostosis.

Changes in mandibular position during midface distraction in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in mandibular position during midface distraction. Midface distraction was performed in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis to increase upper airway volume. Although this treatment resulted in changes in occlusion, the concomitant changes in mandibular position were poorly understood. In this retrospective study, three-dimensional (3D) cephalograms were obtained before and after midface distraction in 15 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Perioperative polysomnography scores and changes in maxillary and mandibular position, mandibular volume, and upper airway volume were analyzed. Results showed a significant improvement in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (from 20.6 ± 21.3 to 6.9 ± 5.1, p < 0.05) and upper airway volume (from 2951.65 ± 2286.38 to 5218.04 ± 3150.05 mm3, p < 0.001). When the lowest point of the sella turcica was set as the reference point, the mandible moved significantly in an anterior direction (from 47.9 ± 11.5 to 51.9 ± 9.8 mm, p < 0.05). Mandibular volume did not change significantly perioperatively (from 32530.19 ± 10726.01 to 35590.50 ± 14879.21 mm3, p = 0.10). There were positive correlations between the rates of improvement in AHI and the amount of mandibular movement in the anterior and inferior directions (both p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that the mandible moved in the anterior-inferior direction after midface distraction, and the amount of movement correlated with improvement in respiratory function. Therefore, it is important to consider the position of the mandible when determining the direction of midface distraction, as it may influence the therapeutic effect.

The effect of continuous positive airway pressure on obstructive sleep apnea in children with syndromic craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC). However, objective data on the treatment of OSA in children with SC remain inadequate. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the management of OSA in children with SC. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in children with SC and OSA diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG), which was defined as an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 1. Patients were included if they were treated with CPAP and had baseline PSG and follow-up sleep studies. Clinical and demographic data were collected from all enrolled subjects. RESULTS: A total of 45 children with SC and OSA were identified, with an average age of 6.8 ± 4.7 years. Among them, 36 cases had moderate to severe OSA (22 with severe OSA) and received CPAP therapy followed by post-treatment sleep studies. Notably, there was a significant reduction in the AHI observed after CPAP treatment (3.0 [IQR: 1.7, 4.6] versus 38.6 [IQR: 18.2, 53.3] events/h; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CPAP is effective and acceptable in treating severe OSA in children with SC.

Posterior cranial vault distraction in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: the era of biodegradable materials-a comprehensive review of the literature and proposed novel global application.

Distraction osteogenesis is utilized to increase intracranial volume in the treatment of restrictive pathologies, most commonly syndromic synostosis. Children too young for open calvarial vault expansion or other systemic or local contraindications to a direct reconstructive approach benefit greatly from distraction osteogenesis, typically addressing posterior vault expansion. Wound infection, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, device failure, need for a second surgery for removal, and cost, are issues that can limit the use of this approach. These challenges are more pronounced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to lack of access to the device, the financial burden of the need for a second surgery, and the severity of the implications of infection and CSF leak. Over the last five decades, there has been an increased acceptance of bioresorbable instrumentation in craniofacial surgery. Poly L-lactic acid, polyglycolic acid, and polydioxanone are the most commonly used polymers. New resorbable fixation tools such as ultrasound-activated pins and heat-activated pins are superior to conventional bioresorbable screws in allowing attachment to thinner bone plates. In this paper, we present a review of the literature on cranial vault distraction and the use of bioresorbable materials and propose a novel design of a fully absorbable cranial distractor system using external magnetic distraction control, eliminating the need for external activation ports and a second surgery to remove the hardware. The application of this technology in LMIC settings could advance access to care and treatment options for patients with syndromic synostosis.

Are Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis at Greater Risk for Epilepsy than Patients with Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) are at increased risk for epilepsy relative to patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSCS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis (CS) were included. The primary predictor variable was study grouping (SCS vs. NSCS). The primary outcome variable was a diagnosis of epilepsy. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent risk factors for epilepsy. RESULTS: The final study sample included a total of 10,089 patients (mean age, 1.78 years ± 3.70; 37.7% female). 9278 patients (92.0%) had NSCS, and the remaining 811 patients (8.0%) had SCS. A total of 577 patients (5.7%) had epilepsy. Not controlling for other variables, patients with SCS were at increased risk for epilepsy relative to patients with NSCS (OR 2.1, P < 0.001). After controlling for all significant variables, patients with SCS were no longer at increased risk for epilepsy relative to patients with NSCS (OR 0.73, P = 0.063). Hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation (CM), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), atrial septal defect (ASD), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) were all independent risk factors (P < 0.05) for epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: Syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) in itself is not a risk factor for epilepsy relative to NSCS. The greater prevalence of hydrocephalus, CM, OSA, ASD, and GERD, all of which were risk factors for epilepsy, in patients with SCS relative to patients with NSCS likely explains the greater prevalence of epilepsy in SCS relative to NSCS.

Perioperative Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis Undergoing LeFort III Osteotomy With Distraction: A Case Series.

Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Objective: The purpose of this publication is to address the absence of literature detailing respiratory management in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and obstructive sleep apnea during the immediate postoperative interval following LeFort III advancement with placement of distraction hardware but prior to sufficient midface advancement. Methods: After IRB approval, the investigators retrospectively selected candidates for inclusion in this case series. The sample was composed of four patients ranging from 10 to 19 years of age undergoing LeFort III midface advancement during a one-year span at a single tertiary care center. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Three of the selected patients suffered significant obstructive sleep apnea necessitating the operation, as determined by polysomnography. One patient experienced persistent apnea postoperatively requiring prolonged ICU level care. Results: Three of the four patients had severe OSA diagnosed by polysomnography with a median AHI of 28.3. Two of the three patients with preoperative OSA experienced no untoward respiratory compromise in the immediate postoperative period; one required nightly oxygen tent and the other required no supplemental oxygen. Patient 1 experienced significant postoperative respiratory distress with nightly apneic episodes and desaturations requiring supplemental oxygen and frequent stimulation. Conclusions: The present study suggests that early involvement of sleep medicine and management of patient expectations is vital. Extremely close postoperative monitoring in the ICU is necessary. Future studies are needed to protocolize perioperative management of obstructive sleep apnea in patients undergoing LeFort III osteotomy prior to initiation and completion of midface advancement.

[Application and development of orthognathic surgery in treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis].

Objective: To summarize the application and recent development of orthognathic surgery in treating syndromic craniosynostosis. Methods: The related literature at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the indications, routine procedures, and protocols of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis were summarized and analyzed. Results: Craniosynostosis is a common congenital craniofacial malformation. Syndromic craniosynostosis usually involves premature fusion of multiple cranial sutures and is associated with other deformities. Orthognathic surgery is the necessary and effective means to improve the midfacial hypoplasia and malocclusion. Le Fort I osteotomy combined with sagittal split ramus osteotomy are the common surgical options. Orthognathic surgery should combine with craniofacial surgery and neurosurgery, and a comprehensive long-term evaluation should be conducted to determine the best treatment plan. Conclusion: Orthognathic surgery plays an important role in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis. The development of digital technology will further promote the application and development of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis.

Apert Syndrome: Selection Rationale for Midface Advancement Technique.

Apert syndrome is characterized by a wide spectrum of craniofacial clinical features that have been successfully addressed via a variety of midface advancement techniques. Although surgeons have individual preferences as to which specific procedures should be performed to best treat Apert patients, craniofacial plastic surgeons, working in tandem with pediatric neurosurgeons, can identify and evaluate functional limitations and facial morphologic disproportions, and establish appropriate criteria for effective midface advancement technique indication and selection. The purpose of this review article is to present and discuss our rationale for midface advancement technique selection based upon the most common craniofacial characteristics presented by Apert syndrome patients. The present article also provides a grading system that stratifies as major, moderate, and mild, the effect of each midface advancement technique on the different types of Apert syndrome facial features. Surgeons should take into consideration the maximum effect and benefit of each craniofacial osteotomy and how these procedures will alter the craniofacial skeleton. By understanding the long-term effect of each osteotomy on the most common craniofacial characteristics of Apert syndrome patients, craniofacial plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons will be able to customize the surgical procedures they perform in order to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Facial skeleton dysmorphology in syndromic craniosynostosis: differences between FGFR2 and no-FGFR2-related syndromes and relationship with skull base and facial sutural patterns.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of FGFR2 mutations and sutural synostotic patterns on facial skeleton dysmorphology in children with syndromic craniosynostosis. METHODS: Preoperative high-resolution CT images in 39 infants with syndromic craniosynostosis were evaluated. Patients were divided into infants with and without FGFR2 mutations; each group was split according to synostotic involvement of minor sutures/synchondroses: isolated or combined involvement of middle (MCF) and posterior cranial fossae (PCF). Quantitative analysis of the midface and mandible measures was performed. Each subgroup was compared with a group of age-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with FGFR2 related syndromes were clustered in 3 subgroups: MCF + PCF (8 patients, 5.4 ± 1.75 months), MCF (8 patients, 3.62 ± 1.68 months), and PCF (8 patients, 2.75 ± 0.46 months). Fifteen no-FGFR2 patients were clustered in 2 subgroups: MCF + PCF (7 patients, 9.42 ± 0.78 months) and PCF (8 patients, 7.37 ± 2.92 months). Both FGFR2 and no-FGFR2 groups with involvement of minor sutures coursing in MCF showed more facial sutural synostoses. Children with minor suture/synchondrosis synostosis of MCF (MCF-PCF and MCF subgroups) showed altered position of glenoid fossa and mandibular inclination ([Formula: see text]), but children in the FGFR2 group had also reduced midfacial depth and maxillary length ([Formula: see text]). Children with minor suture/synchondrosis synostosis of PCF (PCF subgroups) had reduced posterior mandibular height, but those children in the FGFR2 group also showed reduced intergonion distance ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: In children with syndromic craniosynostosis, both skull base and facial suture synostosis affect facial dysmorphology/hypoplasia. FGFR2 mutations may worsen facial hypoplasia both acting on bone development and causing an earlier premature closure of facial sutures.

De novo variants implicate chromatin modification, transcriptional regulation, and retinoic acid signaling in syndromic craniosynostosis.

Craniosynostosis (CS) is the most common congenital cranial anomaly. Several Mendelian forms of syndromic CS are well described, but a genetic etiology remains elusive in a substantial fraction of probands. Analysis of exome sequence data from 526 proband-parent trios with syndromic CS identified a marked excess (observed 98, expected 33, p = 4.83 × 10-20) of damaging de novo variants (DNVs) in genes highly intolerant to loss-of-function variation (probability of LoF intolerance > 0.9). 30 probands harbored damaging DNVs in 21 genes that were not previously implicated in CS but are involved in chromatin modification and remodeling (4.7-fold enrichment, p = 1.1 × 10-11). 17 genes had multiple damaging DNVs, and 13 genes (CDK13, NFIX, ADNP, KMT5B, SON, ARID1B, CASK, CHD7, MED13L, PSMD12, POLR2A, CHD3, and SETBP1) surpassed thresholds for genome-wide significance. A recurrent gain-of-function DNV in the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA; c.865G>A [p.Gly289Arg]) was identified in two probands with similar CS phenotypes. CS risk genes overlap with those identified for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders, are highly expressed in cranial neural crest cells, and converge in networks that regulate chromatin modification, gene transcription, and osteoblast differentiation. Our results identify several CS loci and have major implications for genetic testing and counseling.

Cognitive performance in preschoolers with non-syndromic craniosynostosis undergoing surgery: A comparison with typically developing children.

This study aimed to determine the cognitive profile of preschool children undergoing surgery to correct non-syndromic craniosynostosis, compare them with typically developing children, and analyze possible cognitive deficits in the most prevalent subtypes: sagittal and unicoronal. Thirty-one children aged 3 years to 5 years and 11 months with non-syndromic craniosynostosis (11 sagittal, 9 unicoronal, 4 metopic, 3 lambdoid, 4 multisutural) who underwent surgery were compared with thirty-one typically developing children. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition (WPPSI-III) was used to assess cognitive function. Children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis scored below the typically developing children in the Verbal Intelligence Quotient (VIQ) and Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FISQ). When specific subtypes were compared, children with sagittal synostosis scored similarly to the typically developing children; in contrast, children with unicoronal synostosis had lower performance in the Processing Speed Quotient and FISQ. The proportion of participants scoring below one standard deviation on the VIQ, General Language Composite, and FISQ was greater in the non-syndromic craniosynostosis group. This study supports the finding that children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis, particularly those with unicoronal synostosis, have more cognitive difficulties than those with normal development. Assessing cognition at preschool age in children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis is important in order to detect difficulties before they become more apparent at school age.

Practical Algorithm for the Management of Multisutural Craniosynostosis with Associated Chiari Malformation and/or Hydrocephalus.

INTRODUCTION: The association between multisutural craniosynostosis with Chiari malformation (CM), venous hypertension, and hydrocephalus is widely described in the literature, especially in children with paediatric craniofacial syndromes. Some efforts have been done in the last years to understand the complex pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this association, and several theories have been proposed. In particular, it is now accepted that the hypothesis of the overcrowding of the posterior fossa due to precocious suture fusion is the cause of the cerebellar herniation in syndromic and non-syndromic patients, against the theory of intrinsic cerebellar anomalies, ventriculomegaly, and venous hypertension. However, whatever the pathophysiological mechanism, it is still unclear what the best management and treatment of CM and hydrocephalus are in multisutural craniosynostosis patients. The aim of this study was to report our 25 years' experience in treating paediatric patients affected by these rare pathologies in order to propose a simple and effective therapeutic flow chart for their management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of each patient who underwent a cranial vault remodelling (CVR) for complex multisutural craniosynostosis in our institution in the last 25 years, while monosutural craniosynostosis was excluded. We recorded data concerning type of craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes, presence of ventriculomegaly, and CM at presentation and clinical and radiological follow-up. Therefore, we evaluated the final outcomes (improved, stable, deteriorated) of these patients and created a practical flow chart that could help physicians choose the best surgical treatment when different pathological conditions, as Chiari malformation I (CMI) or hydrocephalus, affect complex craniosynostosis children. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (39 out of 55; 70.9%), with an isolated multisutural craniosynostosis at presentation, underwent a two-step CVR as first surgery; 36 patients (92.3%) had an improved outcome, 2 patients (5.1%) had a stable outcome, and 1 patient (2.56%) had a deteriorated outcome. Other eight children (8 out of 55; 14.5%) had a radiological evidence of asymptomatic CMI at presentation. In this group, we performed CVR as first surgery. As for the final outcome, 7 patients had an improved outcome (87.5%) with good aesthetic result and stability or resolution of CMI. Finally, 7 patients (7 out of 55; 12.7%) presented a various combination of CMI and ventriculomegaly or hydrocephalus at presentation. Among them, 3 patients had an improved outcome (42.8%), and 4 patients had a deteriorated outcome (57.1%). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of one pathological condition with associated symptoms over the others was the key factor leading our therapeutic strategy. When craniosynostosis is associated with a radiological CM, the assessment of clinical symptoms is of capital importance. When asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic, we suggest a CVR as first step, for its efficacy in reducing tonsillar herniation and solving CM symptoms. When craniosynostosis is associated with ventricular enlargement, the presence of intracranial hypertension signs and symptoms forces physicians to first treat hydrocephalus with a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. For patients with various degrees and severity of ventriculomegaly and associated CM, the outcomes were very heterogeneous, even when the same therapeutic strategy was applied to patients with similar starting conditions and symptoms. This is maybe the most unexpected and least clear part of our results. Despite the proposed algorithm comes from a clinical experience on 85% successfully treated patients with multiple craniosynostosis, more extensive and deep studies are needed to better understand CM and hydrocephalus development in such conditions.

Primary Delayed Onset Craniosynostosis in a Child With ERF-Related Craniosynostosis Syndrome and Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Syndrome.

Primary delayed onset craniosynostosis is defined as premature suture fusion that developed despite clear radiographic evidence of normal postnatal calvarial configuration and patent sutures earlier in life. It is rare in the literature and typically presents as secondary synostosis. In this brief clinical study, primary delayed onset craniosynostosis is described in its unique presentation at 4 years of age with a complex genetic history including ERF-related craniosynostosis syndrome and familial cerebral cavernous malformation syndrome. Although the delayed onset clinical course of ERF-related craniosynostosis syndrome has not been well described in the literature, our review suggests that it is distinctive to ERF-related craniosynostosis and should be considered when cases present without a history of trauma, when there is a positive family history, and particularly when cases present late onset; after 1 year of age.

ERF-related craniosynostosis and surgical management in the paediatric cohort.

INTRODUCTION: ERF mutation is one of the most recently identified genetic aberrations associated with syndromic craniosynostosis. Data on the pattern of craniosynostosis, surgical management of ERF-related craniosynostosis and outcomes is limited. We report on our single-centre experience in paediatric cohort of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis secondary to ERF mutation. METHODS: A retrospective review of all paediatric craniofacial cases was performed over an 8-year period (2014-2022). All patients with genetically confirm ERF-related craniosynostosis were identified, and clinical parameters including, age, sex, pattern of craniosynostosis, associated tonsillar herniation and follow-up period were further analysed from electronic clinical and imaging systems. All patients were selected and discussed in multidisciplinary craniofacial meeting (composed of neurosurgical, maxillofacial, plastics and genetics teams) prior to any surgical intervention. RESULTS: Overall, 10 patients with ERF-related craniosynostosis were identified with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1 with mean age at the time of surgery of 21.6 months with a mean follow-up period of 5.2 years. ERF-confirmed cases led to variable craniosynostosis pattern with multi-sutural synostosis with concurrent sagittal and bilateral lambdoid involvement as the most common pattern (7/10). No patient pre-operatively had evidence of papilloedema on ophthalmological assessment. Eight out of 10 patients had associated low-lying tonsils/hind brain hernia pre-operatively. Eight out of 10 patients required surgery which included 2 fronto-orbital advancement, 3 calvarial remodelling, 2 posterior calvarial remodelling/release and 1 insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt. CONCLUSION: Involvement of sagittal and lambdoid sutures is the most common pattern of craniosynostosis. ERF-related craniosynostosis can have variable pattern of suture fusion, and management of each patient requires unique surgical planning and execution based on clinical needs for the optimal outcomes.