The Impact of Rapid Exome Sequencing on Medical Management of Critically Ill Children.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of rapid exome sequencing (rES) in critically ill children with likely genetic disease using a standardized process at a single institution. To provide evidence that rES with should become standard of care for this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a process to provide clinical-grade rES to eligible children at a single institution. Eligibility included (a) recommendation of rES by a consulting geneticist, (b) monogenic disorder suspected, (c) rapid diagnosis predicted to affect inpatient management, (d) pretest counseling provided by an appropriate provider, and (e) unanimous approval by a committee of 4 geneticists. Trio exome sequencing was sent to a reference laboratory that provided verbal report within 7-10 days. Clinical outcomes related to rES were prospectively collected. Input from geneticists, genetic counselors, pathologists, neonatologists, and critical care pediatricians was collected to identify changes in management related to rES. RESULTS: There were 54 patients who were eligible for rES over a 34-month study period. Of these patients, 46 underwent rES, 24 of whom (52%) had at least 1 change in management related to rES. In 20 patients (43%), a molecular diagnosis was achieved, demonstrating that nondiagnostic exomes could change medical management in some cases. Overall, 84% of patients were under 1 month old at rES request and the mean turnaround time was 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: rES testing has a significant impact on the management of critically ill children with suspected monogenic disease and should be considered standard of care for tertiary institutions who can provide coordinated genetics expertise.

Highly Effective Model for Implementation of In-House Platelets in a Tertiary Veteran Hospital Setting Without a Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Platelet products have a limited shelf life and are costly. Therefore, to balance clinical usage/availability and wastage in a tertiary hospital setting without a trauma center, an innovative system model was established. This system reduced wastage by transferring platelet unit approaching their expiration date to a nearby facility (with the same blood supplier and a trauma center) before expiration, when there is no anticipated need for the product at the original location. METHODS: A review of data to determine the degree of platelet wastage and wastage costs one year before implementation of this measure in October 2017 and one year after implementation of this measure. RESULTS: Since the implementation of this measure, no platelet units have expired on the shelf. In contrast, from October 2016 to October 2017, before implementation of platelet transfer, platelet products expired regularly. CONCLUSION: This new system model is highly effective in maintaining platelet inventory without wastage.

Impact of Oxycodone HCl Extended-release Formulary Restrictions on Extended-release Opioid Market Share, Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Commercial and Medicare Plans.

Background: Previous research demonstrated that utilization management (UM) such as prior authorization (PA) or non-formulary (NF) restrictions may reduce pharmacy costs when designed and applied appropriately to certain drug classes. However, such access barriers may also have unintended consequences. Few studies systemically analyzed the impact of major UM strategies to extended-release (ER) opioids on different types of health plans. Objective: This study evaluated, from payer perspective, the impact of formulary restrictions (PA, NF, or step therapy [ST]) for branded oxycodone HCl extended release (OER) on market share, and healthcare resource utilization/costs in ER opioids patients for multiple types of health plans in the United States. Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal case-control study analyzed prescription and outpatient medical claims data (2012 to 2015) for adult ER opioid patients from US plans (commercial,/Medicare, national/regional) that instituted OER PA, NF, or ST. Patients from each restricted plan (cases) were matched to patients in an unrestricted plan (controls) on key patient characteristics. ER opioid market share and healthcare resource utilization/costs for both cases and controls were evaluated for the 6-month period before and after the formulary restriction dates. A difference-in-differences (DiD) approach was utilized to evaluate change in the total per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare utilization and costs. Results: The study comprised 1622 (national commercial PA), 2020 (regional commercial PA), 34 703 (national commercial ST), and 4372 (national Medicare NF) cases and equivalent number of controls. OER market share decreased after the formulary restrictions, with the national Medicare NF plan showing the greatest decrease (9.2%). DiD analyses indicated that PPPM office visit change in the PA and NF plans were non-significant (decreased by 0.1 and 0.2, P>0.05), but significant in the ST plan (increased by 0.1, P=0.0001). For most plans, no significant total monthly cost change was observed; PPPM costs decreased by $48.74 and $59.87 in ST and regional PA plans and increased by $37.90 in national NF plans (all P>0.05). Conclusions: This study observed that despite reducing the market share of OER, OER formulary restrictions had negligible impact on overall ER opioid utilization, and did not result in substantial pharmacy/medical cost savings.

Will the PCSK9 Inhibitors Be Employers' "Line in the Sand"?

After the introductions of sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) and ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir (Harvoni) for the treatment of hepatitis C, employers have become very sensitive to new, and especially unforeseen, factors that significantly raise healthcare costs. With the recent launch of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, self-insured and fully insured employers have been seeking information on this drug class and its potential for off-label use, which could amount to up to $23 billion in healthcare expenditures, according to a report from Prime Therapeutics. Based on their approved indications, 0.4% of commercial members may be eligible to use PCSK9 inhibitors, at a cost of $3.29 per member per month. Corporate employers are evaluating their options to manage the new expense associated with the novel PCSK9 inhibitors.