Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 1.660
Filtrer
4.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 279, 2024 May 25.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796524

RÉSUMÉ

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is classically considered a low-risk, self-limiting eruption lacking systemic manifestations and sparing facial and mucosal areas. We present 7 inpatients meeting diagnostic criteria for SDRIFE with concomitant systemic manifestations ± high-risk facial involvement acutely after antibiotic exposure (mean latency 6.71 days). These cases deviate from classic, self-limited SDRIFE and represent a unique phenotype of SDRIFE, characterized by coexisting extracutaneous manifestations. Onset of systemic stigmata coincided with or preceded cutaneous involvement in 4 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients developed peripheral eosinophilia and 6 patients had ≥ 2 extracutaneous systems involved. Facial involvement, a high-risk feature associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions but atypical in classic SDRIFE, occurred in 4 cases. Patients had favorable clinical outcomes following drug cessation and treatment with 4-6 week corticosteroid tapers. We suggest that baseline labs be considered in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-induced SDRIFE. These patients may also necessitate systemic therapy given extracutaneous involvement, deviating from standard SDRIFE treatment with drug cessation alone.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , Toxidermies , Exanthème , Phénotype , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Exanthème/induit chimiquement , Exanthème/diagnostic , Antibactériens/effets indésirables , Toxidermies/étiologie , Toxidermies/diagnostic , Toxidermies/anatomopathologie , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Éosinophilie/diagnostic , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement
5.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 242, 2024 Apr 17.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632589

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome is a severe adverse drug reaction marked by delayed hypersensitivity reactions causing skin and systemic complications. DRESS diagnosis is challenging due to the variety of clinical presentations and symptom overlap with other conditions. The perioperative period in these patients requires precise pharmacological strategies to prevent complications associated with this syndrome. The treatment of DRESS induced by unfractionated heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery presents some challenges that must be considered when selecting an anticoagulant to avoid side effects. In this case, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing CPB. However, in contrast to heparin/protamine, there is no direct reversal agent for bivalirudin. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of an 11-year-old male diagnosed with native aortic valve endocarditis and thrombosis in his left lower extremity. During valvular replacement surgery, systemic unfractionated heparin was administered. Postoperatively, the patient developed fever, eosinophilia and pruritic rash. Warm shock and elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels followed, leading to the diagnosis of DRESS syndrome. Treatment with methylprednisolone resulted in complete resolution of symptoms. Seven years later, the patient was readmitted due to insufficient anticoagulation and a thrombus in the prosthetic aortic valve, presenting a recurrent DRESS episode due to the administration of unfractionated heparin, which was later replaced with low-molecular-weight heparin during hospitalization. Treatment with corticosteroids and antihistamines was initiated, resulting in the resolution of this episode. Ultimately, the patient required the Ross procedure. During this intervention the anticoagulation strategy was modified, unfractionated heparin was replaced with bivalirudin during the procedure and fondaparinux was administered during the postoperative period. This resulted in stable transaminases levels and no eosinophilia. CONCLUSION: The severity of DRESS Syndrome underscores the importance of early recognition, heightened monitoring, and a comprehensive approach tailored to each patient's needs. This particular case highlights the significance of this approach and may have a substantial clinical impact since it provides alternatives to heparin, such as bivalirudin and fondaparinux, in the anticoagulation strategy of CPB for patients who have a hypersensibility reaction to this medication; thus, enhancing clinical outcomes by minimizing risks linked to adverse drug reactions.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Mâle , Humains , Enfant , Héparine/usage thérapeutique , Fondaparinux , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/traitement médicamenteux , Anticoagulants/usage thérapeutique , Hirudines/effets indésirables , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/traitement médicamenteux , Fragments peptidiques , Protéines recombinantes
7.
JAAPA ; 37(3): 1-4, 2024 Mar 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386937

RÉSUMÉ

ABSTRACT: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is rare but carries significant mortality and morbidity, making early identification and definitive management crucial. The diagnosis of DRESS is made clinically and involves consideration of a broad list of differential diagnoses. Given variable clinical presentations among patients with DRESS syndrome, clinicians should look for common findings and other hallmarks of the syndrome while monitoring for known complications. Additionally, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion to avoid missing more mild presentations, such as in this case patient with DRESS syndrome minor.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Exanthème , Humains , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/diagnostic , Éosinophilie/complications , Exanthème/étiologie
8.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2311843, 2024 12.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316016

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Dupilumab has been approved for the treatment of severe asthma with type 2 inflammation by inhibiting interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling. However, dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia (HE) has been reported and should not be ignored. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dupilumab in Chinese patients with severe asthma, whether HE affects its efficacy, and the possible risk factors for HE. METHODS: 20 patients with severe asthma who received dupilumab treatment for at least 12 months in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from 2019 to 2022 were included. We compared clinical data and laboratory tests results before dupilumab treatment and at 4 and 12 months after treatment. Based on whether dupilumab treatment triggers HE defined as blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥ 1.5 × 109 cells/L, the patients were allocated into non-HE and HE groups. RESULTS: The patients showed a significant increase in asthma control test (ACT) scores, a decrease in the number of exacerbations, a decrease in the proportion of patients taking an oral corticosteroid (OCS) and in the dose, and a significant improvement in the pulmonary function parameters FEV1/FVC (%) and FEV1 (% predicted) after 4 and 12 months of treatment with dupilumab. For type 2 inflammatory biomarkers, the levels of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), sputum eosinophil count percentage (SEC%) and total immunoglobulin E (TIgE) decreased significantly, whereas BEC were higher after 4 months of treatment, but returned to baseline levels after 12 months. 8 patients (40%) developed asymptomatic HE after dupilumab, and the efficacy was not significantly different between the HE and non-HE groups. The earliest BEC elevation appeared at 1 month after treatment, but most of them declined after 6 months, and basically returned to the baseline level around 12 months of treatment. In addition, we further found that when patients had FeNO ≥ 60 ppb, food allergens positive and combined eosinophilic otitis media (EOM), their BEC increased significantly more than that of the control group after 4 months as well as 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that dupilumab was efficacious in Chinese patients with severe asthma, and some patients developed asymptomatic, self-limited HE, which did not affect its efficacy. Additionally, FeNO ≥60 ppb, food allergens positive, and co-morbidities with EOM may be the risk factors for developing HE.


Sujet(s)
Asthme , Éosinophilie , Humains , Asthme/traitement médicamenteux , Anticorps monoclonaux humanisés/effets indésirables , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/traitement médicamenteux , Facteurs de risque
9.
J Dermatol ; 51(4): 509-517, 2024 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214543

RÉSUMÉ

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction involving multiple organs. Data on DRESS syndrome among children are currently limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical features, causative drugs, systemic organ involvement, laboratory findings, disease severity score, and treatment outcomes in pediatric DRESS patients. The medical records of all pediatric DRESS patients, based on the RegiSCAR diagnostic criteria and admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from January 2010 to December 2021, were reviewed. Twenty-two cases were identified (males 54.5%) with a median age of 9.5 years. Anticonvulsants (54.5%) and antibiotics (27.3%) were the leading culprit drugs. Skin rash was reported in all cases, followed closely by liver involvement (95.5%). Eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis were identified in 54.5% and 31.8% of cases, respectively. The median latency period was 17.5 days. Liver enzyme elevation was detected at an average onset of 20.0 days and hepatocellular type was the most common pattern of liver injury. Nineteen patients (86.4%) were treated with systemic corticosteroids with prednisolone being the most prescribed medication. One case developed Graves' disease after DRESS and multiple relapses of DRESS. One case (4.5%) died due to refractory status epilepticus that was unrelated to DRESS. Anticonvulsants were the major cause of DRESS in pediatric patients. High suspicion for DRESS is crucial in patients receiving these drugs and presenting with fever, rash, and internal organ involvement.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Mâle , Humains , Enfant , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/traitement médicamenteux , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Anticonvulsivants/effets indésirables , Thaïlande/épidémiologie , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/diagnostic , Éosinophilie/traitement médicamenteux
10.
Dermatitis ; 35(1): 55-60, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37669109

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare drug reaction characterized by a skin rash, eosinophilia, and organ involvement. Objective: Our purpose is to focus on the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of DRESS in the elderly and to identify the incriminated drugs. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients, hospitalized for DRESS with a RegiSCAR ≥4. The population was divided into 2 groups according to age: 65 years or older (G1) and <65 years (G2). The statistical study was performed using the comparative and multivariate analysis. Results: We included 55 patients (30.9% G1 and 69.1% G2). Skin manifestations were comparable in both groups. Lymphadenopathy was less common in G1 with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.012). Renal impairment was more frequent in the elderly with a statistically significant result (P = 0.005). DRESS in the elderly group was significantly associated with the occurrence of sepsis (P = 0.008). Allopurinol was the most common culprit associated with DRESS in G1 (P = 0.001). Relapses and recurrences were comparable in both groups (P = 0.71). Conclusions: DRESS in the elderly is associated with a high risk of complications, mainly kidney involvement and sepsis. Allopurinol is the most incriminated drug.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Sepsie , Humains , Sujet âgé , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/épidémiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Allopurinol/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/épidémiologie , Sepsie/complications
11.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 41(1): 141-142, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37496096

RÉSUMÉ

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an idiosyncratic drug reaction hallmarked by cutaneous eruption, fever, lymphadenopathy, multiorgan involvement, and hematological abnormalities, most often eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis. Leukemoid reactions have rarely been described in DRESS syndrome and here we describe a 16-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital with DRESS syndrome due to minocycline, who had a severe leukocytosis up to 52.08 K/µL. He improved with cessation of minocycline and initiation of systemic steroids. We report this case to add to the literature on hematological abnormalities in pediatric DRESS syndrome.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Réaction leucémoïde , Mâle , Humains , Enfant , Adolescent , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Minocycline/effets indésirables , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement
12.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(5): 911-926, 2024 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516356

RÉSUMÉ

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Humains , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/thérapie , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/diagnostic , Éosinophilie/thérapie , Peau , Hormones corticosurrénaliennes/usage thérapeutique , Fièvre
13.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(5): 885-908, 2024 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516359

RÉSUMÉ

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Humains , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/épidémiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Éosinophilie/épidémiologie , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Anticonvulsivants/effets indésirables , Peau , Pronostic
14.
Intern Med ; 63(8): 1131-1138, 2024 Apr 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612089

RÉSUMÉ

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe drug eruption that causes multiple organ damage. The renal impairment in these patients usually improves with immunosuppressants, but subsequent infections often develop. We herein report a rare case of DRESS syndrome leading to hemodialysis and multiple infections with Pneumocystis pneumonia, cytomegalovirus and Aspergillus despite the administration of low-dose prednisolone. We also present a literature review of cases requiring dialysis after DRESS syndrome. In patients with chronic kidney disease, it is important to be alert for not only the development of DRESS syndrome but also subsequent infections.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Humains , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/complications , Dialyse rénale/effets indésirables
15.
Arch Toxicol ; 98(1): 303-325, 2024 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051367

RÉSUMÉ

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is poorly characterized among patients of Western countries. We aimed to comprehensively assess the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and causative agents in a prospective, well-vetted cohort of DILI patients with DRESS (DILI-DRESS). We identified 53 DILI-DRESS cases from the Spanish DILI Registry and the Latin American DILI Network. For comparison purposes, we defined a group of DILI patients (n = 881). DILI-DRESS cases were younger (47 vs. 53 years, respectively; p = 0.042) and presented more frequently with cholestatic/mixed damage (p = 0.018). Most DILI-DRESS patients showed moderate liver injury, 13% developed severe damage, and only one patient (with hepatocellular injury due to anti-tuberculosis drugs) progressed to acute liver failure and died. DILI-DRESS cases showed a distinctive causative drug pattern compared to DILI cases. The most frequent drugs were carbamazepine (13%), anti-tuberculosis drugs (13%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (11%), and allopurinol and lamotrigine (7.6% each). Among all cases of DILI due to allopurinol and lamotrigine, 67% presented with a DILI-DRESS phenotype, respectively. Higher total bilirubin (TBL) levels at DILI recognition (odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.45) and absence of eosinophilia (OR 8.77; 95% CI 1.11-69.20) increased the risk for developing a severe-fatal injury in DILI-DRESS patients. DILI-DRESS patients have a more frequent cholestasis/mixed pattern of injury at presentation, with antiepileptics as distinctive causative drug class. Most of the lamotrigine and allopurinol cases present with this phenotype. Higher TBL levels and absence of eosinophilia at DILI recognition are markers of poor outcomes.


Sujet(s)
Lésions hépatiques dues aux substances , Cholestase , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Humains , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/épidémiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Allopurinol/effets indésirables , Études prospectives , Lamotrigine , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/épidémiologie , Lésions hépatiques dues aux substances/épidémiologie , Lésions hépatiques dues aux substances/étiologie , Anticonvulsivants , Antituberculeux , Enregistrements
16.
JAMA Dermatol ; 160(1): 37-44, 2024 Jan 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37966824

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially fatal drug hypersensitivity reaction. To our knowledge, there is no international consensus on its severity assessment and treatment. Objective: To reach an international, Delphi-based multinational expert consensus on the diagnostic workup, severity assessment, and treatment of patients with DRESS. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Delphi method was used to assess 100 statements related to baseline workup, evaluation of severity, acute phase, and postacute management of DRESS. Fifty-seven international experts in DRESS were invited, and 54 participated in the survey, which took place from July to September 2022. Main Outcomes/Measures: The degree of agreement was calculated with the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as a statement with a median appropriateness value of 7 or higher (appropriate) and a disagreement index of lower than 1. Results: In the first Delphi round, consensus was reached on 82 statements. Thirteen statements were revised and assessed in a second round. A consensus was reached for 93 statements overall. The experts agreed on a set of basic diagnostic workup procedures as well as severity- and organ-specific further investigations. They reached a consensus on severity assessment (mild, moderate, and severe) based on the extent of liver, kidney, and blood involvement and the damage of other organs. The panel agreed on the main lines of DRESS management according to these severity grades. General recommendations were generated on the postacute phase follow-up of patients with DRESS and the allergological workup. Conclusions and Relevance: This Delphi exercise represents, to our knowledge, the first international expert consensus on diagnostic workup, severity assessment, and management of DRESS. This should support clinicians in the diagnosis and management of DRESS and constitute the basis for development of future guidelines.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Adulte , Humains , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/diagnostic , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/thérapie , Consensus , Méthode Delphi , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/diagnostic , Éosinophilie/thérapie , Enquêtes et questionnaires
19.
Skinmed ; 21(6): 445-447, 2023.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051248

RÉSUMÉ

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a potentially fatal cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction commonly precipitated by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Cross-reactivity among aromatic AEDs is well-documented, but between aromatic and nonaromatic AEDs. We report a patient with severe DRESS syndrome precipitated by aromatic AED carbamazepine with recrudescence approximately 2 weeks after substitution with nonaromatic AED levetiracetam. The patient was treated with high-dose corticosteroids and switched to the benzodiazepine AED clobazam. At follow-up appointment several weeks later, the patient's rash, liver injury, and eosinophilia had resolved.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Éosinophilie , Humains , Lévétiracétam/usage thérapeutique , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/étiologie , Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse/traitement médicamenteux , Carbamazépine/effets indésirables , Anticonvulsivants/effets indésirables , Éosinophilie/induit chimiquement , Éosinophilie/traitement médicamenteux , Benzodiazépines/effets indésirables
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE