Ten-year trends in lipid management among patients after myocardial infarction in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for acute myocardial infarction. However, real-world data on its prevalence and lipid management trends for Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction are limited. This study aimed to determine the 10-year temporal trends in dyslipidemia prevalence and lipid management in this patient population. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study used a merged database of two nationwide observational cohorts (2011-2020) that included 26,751 participants. The primary endpoints were the achievement rates of the (1) absolute low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L), (2) relative LDL-C target reduction of >50% from the baseline, (3) absolute or relative LDL-C target (American target), and (4) both absolute and relative LDL-C targets (European target). The dyslipidemia prevalence increased from 11.1% to 17.1%, whereas the statin prescription rate increased from 92.9% to 97.0% from 2011 to 2020. The rate of high-intensity statin use increased from 12.80% in 2012 to 69.30% in 2020. The rate of ezetimibe use increased from 4.50% in 2016 to 22.50% in 2020. The high-intensity statin and ezetimibe prescription rates (0.20% to 9.30% from 2016 to 2020) increased gradually. The absolute and relative LDL-C target achievement rates increased from 41.4% and 20.8% in 2012 to 62.5% and 39.5% in 2019, respectively. The American (45.7% in 2012 to 68.6% in 2019) and European (16.5% in 2012 to 33.8% in 2019) target achievement rates also increased. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of lipid management guidelines in clinical practice has improved. However, continued efforts are needed to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events.

Increased coproporphyrin serum levels in healthy volunteers treated with the cholesterol uptake inhibitor ezetimibe.

Ezetimibe undergoes glucuronidation that results in the active metabolite ezetimibe phenoxy-glucuronide (ezetimibe-glucuronide). This phase-II metabolite was shown to interact with the clinically relevant hepatic transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. In recent years, coproporphyrin I (CPI) was established as a Tier 1 biomarker for OATP1B-mediated interactions among other endogenous substrates like CPIII. To evaluate whether levels of the biomarker are affected by ezetimibe treatment, we assessed the impact of ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide on OATP1B1-mediated transport of CPs in vitro. Then, we quantified CP levels in serum samples of healthy volunteers treated with a single oral dose of ezetimibe (20 mg) alone or in combination with rifampin (600 mg). Results from our in vitro experiments showed a significant reduction in cellular CPI accumulation in the presence of ezetimibe-glucuronide with an IC50 of 1.97 µM [95% CI: 1.04 to 3.96], while CPIII accumulation was impacted by 10 µM and above. In the in vivo study, we observed peak CP concentrations 1.33 h after dosing, which is closest to the tmax of the ezetimibe metabolite. Co-administration of ezetimibe with rifampin resulted in even higher serum CP levels. The AUC0-24h of CPI and CPIII increased two- and threefold, respectively, after concomitant dosing compared to ezetimibe alone. Moreover, we quantified CP levels in cumulative urine from both study phases where the renally excreted amount (Ae) of CPI and CPIII increased after ezetimibe and rifampin co-administration compared to ezetimibe alone. In conclusion, our findings indicate that rifampin co-administration results in additional inhibition of OATP1B1 in vivo.

Effects of atorvastatin and ezetimibe on CD147, HIF-1, MMP-2 and VEGF in carotid atherosclerotic plaque under the guidance of IVUS.

Atherosclerosis (AS), as the main pathophysiological basis of coronary heart disease, can develop into carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) through intimal inflammation, necrosis, fibrosis and calcification. However, there are few reports on the clinical drug selection of CAP. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of atorvastatin and ezetimibe on CD147, HIF-1, MMP-2 and VEGF in CAP under the guidance of IVUS, so as to provide basis for CAP of the best drug. 32 male New Zealand rabbits were divided into the control group, the model group, the atorvastatin group and the ezetimibe group randomly. The levels of serum LDL-C and MMP-2 have a significant decrease in atorvastatin group and ezetimibe group (P <0.05). The level of serum CD147 has a significant decrease in ezetimibe group (P <0.05). The average OD value of HIF-1 in atorvastatin group decreased significantly (P <0.05). The relative expression of CD147 and VEGF decreased significantly in atorvastatin group (P <0.05). There were different degrees of fibrous plaque and lipid plaque in model group, atorvastatin group and ezetimibe group. There exists a significant decline of CD147, HIF-1, MMP-2 and VEGF by atorvastatin in plaque, but the effect of ezetimibe is not obvious.

In silico comparative analysis of cestode and human NPC1 provides insights for ezetimibe repurposing to visceral cestodiases treatment.

Visceral cestodiases, like cysticercoses and echinococcoses, are caused by cystic larvae from parasites of the Cestoda class and are endemic or hyperendemic in many areas of the world. Current therapeutic approaches for these diseases are complex and present limitations and risks. Therefore, new safer and more effective treatments are urgently needed. The Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1) protein is a cholesterol transporter that, based on genomic data, would be the solely responsible for cholesterol uptake in cestodes. Considering that human NPC1L1 is a known target of ezetimibe, used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, it has the potential for repurposing for the treatment of visceral cestodiases. Here, phylogenetic, selective pressure and structural in silico analyses were carried out to assess NPC1 evolutive and structural conservation, especially between cestode and human orthologs. Two NPC1 orthologs were identified in cestode species (NPC1A and NPC1B), which likely underwent functional divergence, leading to the loss of cholesterol transport capacity in NPC1A. Comparative interaction analyses performed by molecular docking of ezetimibe with human NPC1L1 and cestode NPC1B pointed out to similarities that consolidate the idea of cestode NPC1B as a target for the repurposing of ezetimibe as a drug for the treatment of visceral cestodiases.

LIpid Response to Statins ± Ezetimibe In Mumbai (LIRIM): A Cross-sectional Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: India has the highest burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among developing nations. Data from international studies show significant underimplementation of recommended aggressive lipid-lowering strategies for achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, especially after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a pattern also observed in India. Moreover, ethnic variation in response to statin therapy has prompted clinicians to adopt lower doses of statin therapy in Asians to achieve comparable LDL-C lowering. OBJECTIVE: To document the dose of statin ± ezetimibe required to achieve the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) goals of LDL-C <55 mg/dL in Indian patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center, cross-sectional, observational, all-comers study in Mumbai evaluated the dose of atorvastatin (A)/rosuvastatin (R) ± ezetimibe (E) treatment at which patients with established ASCVD (n = 542), irrespective of their baseline level, achieved LDL-C goals (<55 mg/dL). Those with LDL-C levels >55 mg/dL on current therapy were switched to R 40 mg ± E 10 mg daily. The final data set (n = 340) included those who achieved LDL-C goals at the initial visit and those at follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes assessed the impact of R 40 mg ± E 10 mg (R40 ± E10) on LDL-C (<55 mg/dL) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [non-HDL-C (<85 mg/dL)] goal achievement, respectively. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, LDL-C <55 mg/dL was observed in 42.16% of patients (n = 113) with R40 and in another 43.28% (n = 116) with R40 + E10. A few patients (n = 39; 14.6%) achieved this goal with other dosages. Similarly, non-HDL-C <85 mg/dL was observed in 39.3% of patients (n = 107) with R40 and in another 47.4% of patients (n = 129) with R40 + E10. Overall, around 20% of patients were unable to achieve their LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals despite being on high-intensity statin ± E therapy. CONCLUSION: In the first report of its kind in India, this study showed that suboptimal LDL-C goal achievement occurred in around 20% of high-risk ASCVD patients on dual therapy. This indicates that clinicians should consider the addition of other therapies [e.g., bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and inclisiran] to mitigate the residual risk. Several more trials are needed to determine the most suitable treatment regimen for this population.

Lipid-Lowering Treatment Gaps in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Using Global Database TriNetX.

Background and Objectives: Patients with previous acute myocardial infarction are at significantly higher risk of recurrent events. Early and intensive lipid-lowering therapy targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is a key strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk in post-acute myocardial infarction patients worldwide. This study aimed to assess patients' real-life lipid-lowering treatment gaps after acute myocardial infarction using a global network, TriNetX, of anonymous, real-time patient data. The uniqueness of the study was the use of the novel, evolving, and constantly improving TriNetX platform and the evaluation of its feasibility for clinical research. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on global repository patients in 2020, diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, with a three-year follow-up. Results: After acute myocardial infarction, the prescribing rate of lipid-lowering medication (statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9I) was insufficient to reach target LDL-C values. The mean LDL-C level decreased from 2.7 mmol/L (103 mg/dL) as measured on the day of AMI to 1.97 mmol/L (76 mg/dL) between 31D and 3M. During the second and third years, the mean LDL-C value was stable (around 2.0 mmol/L (78 mg/dL)). LDL-C goals were not sufficiently reached, as only 7-12% of patients were reported to have LDL-C values < 55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) and 13-20% of patients were reported to have LDL-C values < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) during the follow-up periods. This means that a substantial number of patients remain at a very high risk for CV complications and mortality. Most cardiovascular complications happen within three months after acute myocardial infarction. Conclusions: Gaps remain between the recommendations for managing LDL-C in guidelines and what occurs in real life. The TriNetX platform is an innovative platform with significant potential and should be further developed for clinical research, as it enables the use of valuable interinstitutional data.

The journey to LDL-C goal in the era of combination lipid lowering therapy and why it matters for ASCVD patients: a UK perspective.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to explore the concept of distance and journey to goal, and consideration of these 2 elements a priori when choosing LLT. METHODS: Modelling of expected % LDL-C reductions was carried out on a range of hypothetical patients' baseline LDL-C values prior to any LLT being commenced. Therapies were then added in a stepwise manner based on the pathway demonstrated in current national guidance and compared with goal achievement on a novel LLT optimization pathway implemented in Morecambe Bay NHS Trust. RESULTS: Modelling of a stepwise lipid management pathway shows that high-intensity statin monotherapy is not sufficient in most modelled baseline LDL-C scenarios to achieve guideline-recommended goals. Furthermore, ezetimibe second line may preclude 3rd line injectable prescribing and lead to "ezetimibe limbo" where the patient is now below the reimbursement threshold for injectable prescribing but still not achieving their LDL-C target. Overall goal achievement is poor across the spectrum of modelled LDL-C levels. In contrast, by following the Morecambe Bay pathway all patients on statin for the range of hypothetical baseline LDL-C levels can reach an LDL-C target of < 1.8 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a therapeutic gap when following a stepwise approach highlighted by recent national guidance. Our proposal of a novel pathway highlights that the order in which drugs are added is important in the context of national reimbursement thresholds and allows LDL-C goal to be reached in a timely manner, regardless of the starting baseline LDL-C level.

Ezetimibe protects against Gentamycin-induced ototoxicity in rats by antioxidants, anti-inflammatory mechanisms, and BDNF upregulation.

OBJECTIVE: The threat of hearing loss has become a universal reality. Gentamycin (GM) can lead to ototoxicity and may result in permanent hearing loss. This study aimed to elucidate whether the hypolipidemic drug Ezetimibe (EZE) has a possible underlying mechanism for protecting rats from GM-induced ototoxicity. METHODS AND RESULTS: 30 male Wister albino rats were separated into three groups, ten in each group: control, GM, and GM + EZE. At the end of the experiment, rats underwent hearing threshold evaluation via auditory brainstem response (ABR), carotid artery blood flow velocity (CBV), and resistance (CVR) measurement, in addition to a biochemical assessment of serum malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), catalase (CAT), hemeOxygenase-1 (HO-1), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Also, real-time PCR was employed to quantify the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Cochlea was also studied via histological and immunohistochemical methods. GM revealed a significant increase in CVR, MDA, NO, and TNF-α and a significant decrease in ABR, CBV, CAT, HO-1, and cochlear BDNF expression. EZE supplementation revealed a significant rise in ARB in addition to CBV and a decline in CVR and protected cochlear tissues via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic mechanisms via downregulating Caspase-3 immunoreaction, upregulating proliferating cellular nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunoreaction, and upregulating of the cochlear BDNF expression. Correlations were significantly negative between BDNF and MDA, NO, TNF-α, COX 2, and caspase-3 immunoreaction and significantly positive with CAT, HO-1, and PCNA immunoreaction. DISCUSSION: EZE can safeguard inner ear tissues from GM via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic mechanisms, as well as upregulation of BDNF mechanisms.

Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins has a more beneficial impact on the treatment efficacy and safety of patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to high-intensity statin regimens. HYPOTHESIS: A combination of low/moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe might be more effective and safer than high-intensity statin monotherapy. METHODS: We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing lipid profile alterations, drug-related adverse events, and MACE components between high-intensity statin monotherapy and low/moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our comprehensive search resulted in 32 studies comprising 6162 patients treated with monotherapy against 5880 patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared to monotherapy (MD = -6.6, 95% CI: -10.6 to -2.5); however, no significant differences were observed in other lipid parameters. Furthermore, the combination therapy group experienced a lower risk of myalgia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.57) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The occurrence of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins resulted in a greater reduction in LDL-C levels, a lower rate of myalgia, and less drug discontinuation compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, according to our meta-analysis, the observed reduction in LDL-C levels in the combination group did not correlate with a reduction in MACE compared to the high-intensity statin group.

Safety and efficacy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), affects approximately 18.6 million individuals worldwide and poses a significant healthcare related challenge. Despite the established efficacy of both high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) and moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) in ASCVD management, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. METHODS A thorough literature study was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe with high-intensity statin monotherapy in ASCVD patients. RESULTS In the 13 included studies, involving 8,592 patients, 4,525 (52.67%) of which received moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe treatment. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 156 weeks, with participant ages varying LDL-C from 55.2 to 71 years old. Analysis revealed significant MIS+EZT-associated with greater percentages of patients achieved the goal in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) < 70 (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.76; 95% CI [1.26; 2.45]; p=0.001; I²=73%), LDL-C reduction (Mean Difference (MD) -5.05 mg/dL; 95% CI [-9.02;-1.07]; p<0.013; I²=56%;); Total Cholesterol reduction (MD -7.91 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-14.90; -0.91]; p<0.027; I²=60%); Triglycerides reduction (MD -8.20 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-13.05; -3.35]; p<0.001; I²=2%;); There was no statistical difference between groups in Drug Adverse reaction (Risk Ratio (RR) 1.19; 95% CI [0.79; 1.78]; p=0.404; I²=0%); and Drug intolerance (RR 0.78; 95% CI [0.32; 1.92]; p=0.584; I²=35%). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of MIS+EZT in improving significant lipid profile components for ASCVD patients, as can been seen through the greater percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C <70 mg/dL target and lower LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglycerides levels. Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between the two groups.

The impact of statin-ezetimibe combination therapy versus statin monotherapy on coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of statin monotherapy and statin-ezetimibe combination therapy on coronary plaque regression in acute coronary syndrome patients. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted from July to September 2022 and comprised search on PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane databases to identify studies from January 2010 to July 2022 assessing the effects of statin-ezetimibe combination therapy versus statin monotherapy on coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The outcomes of interest were total atheroma volume, plaque volume, and percent atheroma volume assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Meta-analyses were performed on the studies, and mean differences with 95% confidence interval were estimated using Review Manager v5.4. RESULTS: Of the 730 studies identified, 12(1.64%) were shortlisted, and, of them, 5(41.7%) were analysed in detail. There were a total of 557 patients with a mean follow-up of 9 ± 2.43 months. The difference between baseline and follow-up showed significant lowering in total atheroma volume, plaque volume, and percent atheroma volume (p<0.05) in the patients who were receiving statin-ezetimibe combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to statin medication was found to be significantly more successful in reducing coronary plaque than statin monotherapy.

Continuous Monitoring of Pseudopolymorphic Transition in Ezetimibe Using T1 Relaxation with Time-Domain NMR.

The purpose of this study was to continuously monitor the pseudopolymorphic transition from anhydrate to monohydrate by measuring the NMR relaxation using time-domain NMR (TD-NMR). Taking advantage of the simplicity of the low-field NMR instrument configuration, which is an advantage of TD-NMR, the NMR instrument was connected to a humidity controller to monitor the pseudopolymorphic transition. First, ezetimibe (EZT) monohydrate was prepared from its anhydrate using a saturated salt solution method, and T1 relaxation of EZT monohydrate and anhydrate was measured without a humidity controller. The T1 relaxation results confirmed that EZT anhydrate and monohydrate could be distinguished using T1 relaxation measurement. Next, continuous monitoring was conducted by TD-NMR and connected to a humidity controller. Anhydrous EZT was placed in an NMR glass tube and the T1 relaxation measurement was repeated while maintaining the humidity on the side entering the NMR tube at 80% relative humidity. The T1 relaxation became gradually faster from the initial to middle monitoring phases. The final T1 relaxation was then recovered fully and these T1 relaxation times were the same as the T1 relaxation of EZT monohydrate. This study successfully monitored the pseudopolymorphic transition from EZT anhydrate to monohydrate via NMR relaxation.

Repurposing ezetimibe as a neuroprotective agent in a rotenone-induced Parkinson's disease model in rats: Role of AMPK/SIRT-1/PGC-1α signaling and autophagy.

As a severe neurological disorder, Parkinson's disease (PD) is distinguished by dopaminergic neuronal degeneration in the substantia nigra (SN), culminating in motor impairments. Several studies have shown that activation of the AMPK/SIRT1/PGC1α pathway contributes to an increase in mitochondrial biogenesis and is a promising candidate for the management of PD. Furthermore, turning on the AMPK/SIRT1/PGC1α pathway causes autophagy activation, which is fundamental for maintaining neuronal homeostasis. Interestingly, ezetimibe is an antihyperlipidemic agent that was recently reported to possess pleiotropic properties in neurology by triggering the phosphorylation and activation of AMPK. Thus, our study aimed to investigate the neuroprotective potential of ezetimibe in rats with rotenone-induced PD by activating AMPK. Adult male Wistar rats received rotenone (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) every other day for 21 days to induce experimental PD. Rats were treated with ezetimibe (5 mg/kg/day, i.p.) 1 h before rotenone. Ezetimibe ameliorated the motor impairments in open field, rotarod and grip strength tests, restored striatal dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase in the SN, up-regulated p-AMPK, SIRT1, and PGC1α striatal expression, upsurged the expression of ULK1, beclin1, and LC3II/I, reduced Bax/Bcl2 ratio, and alleviated rotenone-induced histopathological changes in striatum and SN. Our findings also verified the contribution of AMPK activation to the neuroprotective effect of ezetimibe by using the AMPK inhibitor dorsomorphin. Together, this work revealed that ezetimibe exerts a neuroprotective impact in rotenone-induced PD by activating AMPK/SIRT-1/PGC-1α signaling, enhancing autophagy, and attenuating apoptosis. Thus, ezetimibe's activation of AMPK could hold significant therapeutic promise for PD management.

Differential Adherence to Free and Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe: Findings from a Real-World Analysis in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to cardiovascular drug treatment can significantly benefit from a reduced pill burden, but data on this matter derived from real-life settings are currently scanty. This analysis assessed the possible changes in adherence in patients treated with rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (ROS/EZE) as free multi-pill combination who switched to ROS/EZE as single-pill combination in the setting of real clinical practice in Italy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the administrative databases for a catchment area of about seven million health-assisted residents. Adults receiving ROS/EZE as a single-pill combination from January 2010 to June 2020 (followed up to 2021) were identified. The date of the first prescription of single-pill combination of ROS/EZE was considered as the index date. The analysis included the users of ROS/EZE as a free combination during the year before the index date. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected during the period of data availability prior to the index date. Adherence to therapy was evaluated as proportion of days covered (PDC), namely the percentage of days during which a patient had access to medication, in the 12-month interval preceding or following the index date (PDC < 25% non-adherence; PDC = 25-75% partial adherence; PDC > 75% adherence). RESULTS: A total of 1219 patients (61.1% male, aged 66.2 ± 10.4 years) were included. Cardiovascular comorbidities were found in 83.3% of them, diabetes in 26.4%, and a combination of both in 16.2%. Single-pill combination of ROS/EZE was associated with a higher proportion of adherent patients compared to free-pill combination (75.2% vs 51.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis suggested that switching from a regimen based on separate pills to one based on a single-pill combination resulted in improved adherence to ROS/EZE therapy.

Lipid-lowering therapy to control low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels is essential for cardiovascular risk prevention. Successful therapy depends on the type of lipid-lowering therapy, i.e., low or high statin intensity and combination of statins with ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and adherence to therapy, i.e., whether the patient actually takes their pills as prescribed. If there are fewer pills to be taken, this can help patients to follow their treatment. Single-pill combinations of two drugs could facilitate adherence and thus the chances of reaching the recommended lipid targets. Here, we analyzed a sample of Italian patients with dyslipidemia to examine whether the switch from a free combination of two separate pills of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe to a single-pill combination of the same drugs could improve adherence to therapy. We found that the proportion of adherent patients increased from about just over half (51.8%) to about three-fourths (75.1%) when switching from two-pill to single-pill combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. These findings suggest that simplifying therapy can help improve patient adherence, which is essential for reaching lipid targets and ultimately for alleviating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Ezetimibe ketone protects against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and attenuates oxidative stress via activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.

Recently, ezetimibe (EZM) has been suggested to be a potent Nrf2 activator that is important for preventing oxidative stress. Interestingly, we found that its metabolite ezetimibe ketone (EZM-K) also has antioxidant effects. Thus, we investigated the role of EZM-K in preventing renal ischemia‒reperfusion injury (RIRI). Cultured NRK-52E cells were subjected to simulated IR with or without EZM-K. Rats were used to simulate in vivo experiments. EZM-K alleviated H2O2-induced apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and upregulated Nrf2 and HO-1 levels in NRK-52E cells. A HO-1 and a Nrf2 inhibitor reversed the protective effects of EZM-K. In the rat RIRI model, pretreatment with EZM-K activated the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway, suppressed tubular injury and inflammation, and improved renal function. EZM-K significantly prevented renal injury caused by ischemia‒reperfusion via the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling axis both in vivo and in vitro. The other metabolite of EZM, ezetimibe glucuronide (EZM-G) had no protective effects against ROS in RIRI. EZM-G also had no antioxidant effects and could not activate Nrf2/HO-1 signal pathway. Our findings also indicated the therapeutic potential of EZM-K in preventing RIRI.

Therapy for Hyperlipidemia.

Significant advances in atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) risk stratification and treatment have occurred over the past 10 years. While the lipid panel continues to be the basis of risk estimation, imaging for coronary artery calcium is now widely used in estimating risk at the individual level. Statins remain first-line agents for ASCVD risk reduction but in high-risk patients, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid can be added to further reduce individual cardiovascular risk based on results of cardiovascular outcomes trials. Results of randomized control trials do not support use of medications targeted at triglyceride lowering for ASCVD risk reduction, but icosapent ethyl can be considered.

Preincubation-dependent inhibition of organic anion transporting polypeptide 2B1.

Preincubation with inhibitor in organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) in vitro assays may increase the inhibition potency of inhibitors compared to conventional inhibition assays with only short inhibitor coincubation with substrate. The decrease in IC50 may affect prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDI) involving these transporters and inhibitors. Only few drugs, however, have been assessed for the preincubation-dependent inhibition of the OATP2B1 transporter. Therefore, we studied the effect of preincubation on OATP2B1 inhibition with five known OATP2B1 inhibitors (atorvastatin, erlotinib, ezetimibe, ticagrelor and simeprevir) in HEK293 cells transiently overexpressing OATP2B1. IC50 values were determined with and without inhibitor preincubation for 20 min with three different OATP2B1 substrates (dibromofluorescein, DBF; 5-carboxyfluorescein, 5-CF; estrone sulfate). Atorvastatin, ezetimibe, and simeprevir displayed more than 2-fold lower IC50 values after preincubation with at least one of the tested substrates. Altogether, 4 out of 15 inhibitor/substrate combinations exhibited more than 2-fold potentiation of IC50 after inhibitor preincubation. In addition, preincubation by itself, without inhibitor present with the substrate, resulted in more than 50% inhibition of OATP2B1-mediated uptake of DBF and/or 5-CF by atorvastatin, ticagrelor and simeprevir. Thus, erlotinib was the only inhibitor with no indication of potentiation of inhibition by preincubation with any of the tested substrates. In conclusion, preincubation resulted in inhibitor- and substrate-dependent inhibition of OATP2B1. These results support the conclusion that to reduce the risk of false negative DDI prediction, preincubation should be considered also in OATP2B1 inhibition assays.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Fixed-Dose Combination of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10/20 Mg and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Telmisartan/Amlodipine 80/5 Mg in Healthy Subjects.

Background: Management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, which are common comorbid risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, require multiple medications. The development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine aims to enhance patient adherence and persistence, but the potential interactions among the four medications have not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg (ER) and the FDC of telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg (TA). Methods: An open-label, single-sequence, three-period, three-treatment crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. All subjects received ER for 7 days, TA for 9 days and ER combined with TA for 7 days during each treatment period. For PK analysis of total/free ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine, serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours at steady state. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study. Results: Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled, and 34 subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure to each active ingredient after coadministration of the two FDCs was similar to that after each FDC alone. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for the maximum plasma concentration (µg/L) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (h·µg/L) of the combination therapy to monotherapy, assessed at steady state, were as follows: total ezetimibe, 1.0264 (0.8765-1.2017) and 0.9359 (0.7847-1.1163); free ezetimibe, 1.5713 (1.2821-1.9257) and 0.9941 (0.8384-1.1788); rosuvastatin, 2.1673 (1.7807-2.6379) and 1.1714 (0.9992-1.3733); telmisartan, 1.0745 (0.8139-1.4186) and 1.1057 (0.8379-1.4591); and amlodipine, 0.9421 (0.8764-1.0126) and 0.9603 (0.8862-1.0405). Both combination therapy and monotherapy were well tolerated by the subjects. Conclusion: The coadministration of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg was well tolerated in healthy subjects, and the PK interaction between those two FDCs was not clinically significant.

Lipid lowering for prevention of venous thromboembolism: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies have suggested that statins may be associated with reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of the current study was to assess the evidence regarding the comparative effect of all lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in primary VTE prevention. METHODS: After a systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up until 2 November 2022, randomized controlled trials (RCT) of statins (high- or low-/moderate-intensity), ezetimibe, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) were selected. An additive component network meta-analysis to compare VTE risk during long-term follow-up across different combinations of LLT was performed. RESULTS: Forty-five RCTs (n = 254 933 patients) were identified, reporting a total of 2084 VTE events. Compared with placebo, the combination of PCSK9i with high-intensity statin was associated with the largest reduction in VTE risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.80), while there was a trend towards reduction for high-intensity (0.84; 0.70-1.02) and low-/moderate-intensity (0.89; 0.79-1.00) statin monotherapy. Ezetimibe monotherapy did not affect the VTE risk (1.04; 0.83-1.30). There was a gradual increase in the summary effect of VTE reduction with increasing intensity of the LLT. When compared with low-/moderate-intensity statin monotherapy, the combination of PCSK9i and high-intensity statin was significantly more likely to reduce VTE risk (0.66; 0.49-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LLT may have a potential for VTE prevention, particularly in high-intensity dosing and in combination therapy.