Efficacy and safety of Saireito (TJ-114) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation procedures: A randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Early arrhythmia recurrences commonly occur after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation because of irritability and inflammation of left atrium. We hypothesized that short-term use of Saireito would be effective in reducing frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias in the early-phase post-ablation. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing catheter ablation for symptomatic AF were randomly assigned to either a 30-day use of Saireito or control group. The primary endpoint was total number of episodes of frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias including definite recurrent AF and frequent premature atrial contractions during the 30-day treatment period post-ablation. RESULTS: Three (6.0%) out of 50 patients treated with Saireito discontinued the drug because of adverse symptoms. The Saireito group was associated with a numerically lower number of episodes of frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias than the control group (3.1 versus 5.2 times, P = 0.17). The mean daily episodes of frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias were significantly fewer in the Saireito group during Day-6 to Day-10 (0.12/day versus 0.27/day, P = 0.03), and during Day-11 to Day-15 (0.08/day versus 0.24/day, P = 0.001). The prevalence of adverse symptoms during the 30-day treatment period was significantly higher in the Saireito group (18.0% versus 2.0%, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day use of Saireito following AF ablation was associated with a tendency toward reduced number of episodes of frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias during the treatment period, with more pronounced effect in the first two weeks.

Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation vs. high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up (PRIORI study).

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal, cardiac tissue-selective ablation modality. To date, radiofrequency (RF)-guided high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation represents the gold standard besides cryo-ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This single-centre, retrospective study investigated the efficacy of PFA-PVI vs. HPSD-RF PVI in terms of single-procedure arrhythmia-free outcome and safety in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent PVI using PFA or HPSD-RF were enrolled. In group PFA, PVI was performed using a pentaspline PFA catheter. The ablation procedure in group HPSD-RF was performed with RF energy (45 W, ablation index). A total of 410 patients (group PFA, 201; group HPSD-RF, 209) were included. There was no difference between both groups regarding age, gender, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. The procedure time was significantly shorter in group PFA [61 (44-103) vs. 125 (105-143) min; P < 0.001]; fluoroscopy time and dose area product were significantly higher in group PFA [16 (13-20) vs. 4 (2-5) min; P < 0.01 and 412 (270-739) vs. 129 (58-265) µGym2; P < 0.01]. The overall complication rates were 2.9% in group PFA and 6.2% in group HPSD (P = 0.158). There was one fatal stroke in the PFA group. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 85% with PFA and 79% with HPSD-RF (log-rank P = 0.160). In 56 repeat ablation procedures, the PV reconnection rate was 30% after PFA and 38% after HPSD-RF (P = 0.372). CONCLUSION: Both PFA and HPSD-RF were highly efficient and effective in achieving PVI in paroxysmal AF patients. The arrhythmia-free survival is comparable. The PV reconnection rate was not different.

Safety of pulsed field ablation in more than 17,000 patients with atrial fibrillation in the MANIFEST-17K study.

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), for which pre-clinical and early-stage clinical data are suggestive of some degree of preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation without damage to adjacent structures. Here in the MANIFEST-17K study we assessed the safety of PFA by studying the post-approval use of this treatment modality. Of the 116 centers performing post-approval PFA with a pentaspline catheter, data were received from 106 centers (91.4% participation) regarding 17,642 patients undergoing PFA (mean age 64, 34.7% female, 57.8% paroxysmal AF and 35.2% persistent AF). No esophageal complications, pulmonary vein stenosis or persistent phrenic palsy was reported (transient palsy was reported in 0.06% of patients; 11 of 17,642). Major complications, reported for ~1% of patients (173 of 17,642), were pericardial tamponade (0.36%; 63 of 17,642) and vascular events (0.30%; 53 of 17,642). Stroke was rare (0.12%; 22 of 17,642) and death was even rarer (0.03%; 5 of 17,642). Unexpected complications of PFA were coronary arterial spasm in 0.14% of patients (25 of 17,642) and hemolysis-related acute renal failure necessitating hemodialysis in 0.03% of patients (5 of 17,642). Taken together, these data indicate that PFA demonstrates a favorable safety profile by avoiding much of the collateral damage seen with conventional thermal ablation. PFA has the potential to be transformative for the management of patients with AF.

Septal Ablation to Treat Subaortic Dynamic Obstruction Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Dynamic obstruction of the left ventricle is an unusual complication that can occur after aortic valve replacement. It is important to be aware of this pathology as it requires different management than normal complications and can rapidly lead to death. We present a case of successful resolution following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Left atrial remodeling and voltage-guided ablation outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation patients according to CHA2DS2-VASc score.

BACKGROUND: CHA2DS2-VASc score-related differences have been reported in atrial fibrotic remodeling and prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after ablation. There are currently no data on the efficacy of low voltage zone (LVZ)-guided ablation in persistent AF patients according to CHA2DS2-VASc score. We assessed in a cohort of persistent AF patients the extent of LVZ, the regional distribution of LA voltage and the outcome of LA voltage-guided substrate ablation in addition to PVI according to CHA2DS2-VASc score. METHODS: 138 consecutive persistent AF patients undergoing a first voltage-guided catheter ablation were enrolled. 58 patients with CHAD2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 and 80 patients with CHAD2DS2-VASc score ≤ 2 were included. LA voltage maps were obtained using 3D-electroanatomical mapping system in sinus rhythm. LVZ was defined as < 0.5 mV. RESULTS: In the high CHAD2DS2-VASc score group, LA voltage was lower (1.5 [1.1-2.5] vs. 2.3 [1.5-2.8] mV, p = 0.02) and LVZs were more frequently identified (40% vs. 18%), p < 0.01). Female with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 (p = 0.031), LA indexed volume (p = 0.009) and P-wave duration ≥ 150 ms (p = 0.001) were predictors of LVZ. After a 36-month follow-up, atrial arrhythmia-free survival was similar between the two groups (logrank test, P = 0.676). CONCLUSIONS: AF patients with CHAD2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 display more LA substrate remodeling with lower voltage and more LVZs compared with those with CHAD2DS2-VASc score ≤ 2. Despite this atrial remodeling, they had similar and favorable 36 months results after one single procedure. Unlike male with CHAD2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3, female with CHAD2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 was predictor of LVZ occurrence.

Analysis of risk factors for complications in echocardiography-guided percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA) for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) has been previously reported. However, limited investigation has been conducted regarding the complications associated with this procedure. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the risk factors affecting the occurrence of complications during PIMSRA, such as pericardial effusion, ventricular premature beats, and interventricular septal perforation. In this study, the optimal cut-off values for these risk factors are also explored, and corresponding strategies for prevention are proposed. METHODS: A total of 101 patients diagnosed with HOCM who underwent the PIMSRA procedure from 2021 to 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were classified into subgroups with or without complications based on procedural records. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for complications during the PIMSRA procedure. RESULTS: There were 48 patients with complications and 53 patients without complications. The heart rate at the start of the procedure and the maximum left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) were independent risk factors related to PIMSRA complications. The optimal cut-off values for predicting complication occurrence were a heart rate > 49 bpm at the start of the procedure (OR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.64-8.78, p = 0.002) and a maximum LVOTG > 92 mmHg (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.15-5.75, p = 0.022), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of PIMSRA complications is primarily associated with the heart rate at the start of the procedure and the maximum LVOTG. It is recommended to establish a comprehensive control plan to minimize the risk of complications during PIMSRA procedures.

Efficacy and safety of focal pulsed-field ablation for ventricular arrhythmias: two-centre experience.

AIMS: A pulsed electric field (PF) energy source is a novel potential option for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) as it can create deeper lesions, particularly in scarred tissue. However, very limited data exist on its efficacy and safety. This prospective observational study reports the initial experience with VA ablation using focal PF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 44 patients (16 women, aged 61 ± 14years) with either frequent ventricular premature complexes (VPCs, 48%) or scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT, 52%). Ablation was performed using an irrigated 4 mm tip catheter and a commercially available PF generator. On average, 16 ± 15 PF applications (25 A) were delivered per patient. Acute success was achieved in 84% of patients as assessed by elimination of VPC or reaching non-inducibility of VT. In three cases (7%), a transient conduction system block was observed during PF applications remotely from the septum. Root analysis revealed that this event was caused by current leakage from the proximal shaft electrodes in contact with the basal interventricular septum. Acute elimination of VPC was achieved in 81% patients and non-inducibility of VT in 83% patients. At the 3-month follow-up, persistent suppression of the VPC was confirmed on Holter monitoring in 81% patients. In the VT group, the mean follow-up was 116 ± 75 days and a total of 52% patients remained free of any VA. CONCLUSION: Pulsed electric field catheter ablation of a broad spectrum of VA is feasible with acute high efficacy; however, the short-term follow-up is less satisfactory for patients with scar-related VT.

Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias: comparing techniques with and without intracardiac echocardiography - what matters?

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in the ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) has raised questions about its true efficacy and safety. METHODS: This retrospective study collected the periprocedural complications and PVC burden post ablation. The risk factors of PVC recurrence was further explored. RESULTS: The study included patients treated without ICE (control group, n = 451) and with ICE (ICE group, n = 155) from May 2019 to July 2022. The ICE group demonstrated significantly lower fluoroscopy times and X-ray doses. There were no major complications in the ICE group, and the difference in the occurrence of periprocedural complications between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.072). The long-term success rates were similar for the control and ICE groups (89.6% and 87.1%, respectively). The origin of PVCs was identified as the independent factor for ablation success. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ICE did not confer an advantage with regard to long-term success in PVCs ablation. To thoroughly evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ICE in PVCs ablation, a prospective, multicenter, randomized study is warranted.

Relationship between Lesion Parameters after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Striated Muscles and Parenchymal Tissue.

Background and Objectives: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a highly successful intervention. By comparing the lesion changes in prostate parenchymal and striated muscle tissues after RFCA with and without cooling, it was possible to assess the correlation between the shape regularity, area, and perimeter of the thermal lesion, and to predict the geometric shape changes of the lesions. Materials and Methods: A standard prostate and striated muscle RFCA procedure was performed on 13 non-purebred dogs in two sessions: no cooling and cooling with 0.1% NaCl solution. Microtome-cut 2-3 µm sections of tissue samples were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and further examined. The quotient formula was employed to evaluate the geometric shape of the damage zones at the ablation site. Results: The extent of injury following RFCA in striated muscle tissue was comparable to that in prostate parenchymal tissue. Regression analysis indicated a strong and positive relationship between area and perimeter in all experimental groups. In the experimental groups of parenchymal tissues with and without cooling, an increase in the area or perimeter of the damage zone corresponded to an increase in the quotient value. A similar tendency was observed in the striated muscle group with cooling. However, in the striated muscle group without cooling, an increase in lesion area or perimeter lowered the quotient value. Standardised regression coefficients demonstrated that in the striated muscle with cooling, the damage zone shape was more determined by area than perimeter. However, in the parenchymal tissue, the perimeter had a more substantial impact on the damage zone shape than the area. Conclusions: The damage area and perimeter have predictive power on the overall shape regularity of damage zone geometry in both striated muscles and parenchymal tissue. This approach is employed to achieve a balance between the need for tumour eradication and the minimisation of ablation-induced complications to healthy tissue.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation for accessory pathways: a pilot study.

AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation is used as a first-line therapy for accessory pathways (APs). However, data regarding the effects of pulsed field ablation (PFA) on APs are limited. We sought to evaluate the acute procedural and 6-month success and safety of PFA in a cohort of patients with APs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A focal contact force-sensing PFA catheter was used for patients with APs. Pulsed field ablation generator generated a bipolar and biphasic waveform (±1000 V) with a duration of 100 ms from the tip of the PFA catheter. A 100% acute procedural success was achieved in 10 conscious patients with APs (7 left anterolateral, 2 left inferolateral, and 1 right posteroseptal APs) including 6 (60%) patients after an initial application. The average total ablation time was 6.3 ± 4.9 s for 4.7 ± 1.8 ablation sites (ASs), including 3.1 ± 2.4 s at targets and 3.2 ± 2.9 s at 3.2 ± 2 bolus ASs. The mean skin-to-skin time was 59.3 ± 15.5 min, and PFA catheter dwell time was 29.4 ± 7.8 min. One patient encountered transient sinus arrest during PFA due to parasympathetic overexcitation. Sinus rhythm was restored in all patients without any significant adverse events during the short-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pulsed field ablation of APs was feasible, effective, and safe. Its efficiency was remarkable for its ultrarapid termination of AP conduction. Further studies are warranted to prove whether utilization of PFA with current parameters can extend to manifold AP ablation.

Efficacy and safety of a novel hexaspline pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the PLEASE-AF study.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablative modality demonstrating considerable promise for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these PFA trials have almost universally included only Caucasian populations, with little data on its effect on other races/ethnicities. The PLEASE-AF trial sought to study the 12-month efficacy and the safety of a multi-electrode hexaspline PFA catheter in treating a predominantly Asian/Chinese population of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by delivering different pulse intensities at the PV ostium (1800 V) and atrium (2000 V). Acute success was defined as no PV potentials and entrance/exit conduction block of all PVs after a 20-min waiting period. Follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24-h Holter examinations. The primary efficacy endpoint was 12-month freedom from any atrial arrhythmias lasting at least 30 s. The cohort included 143 patients from 12 hospitals treated by 28 operators: age 60.2 ± 10.0 years, 65.7% male, Asian/Chinese 100%, and left atrial diameter 36.6 ± 4.9 mm. All PVs (565/565, 100%) were successfully isolated. The total procedure, catheter dwell, total PFA application, and total fluoroscopy times were 123.5 ± 38.8 min, 63.0 ± 30.7 min, 169.7 ± 34.6 s, and 27.3 ± 10.1 min, respectively. The primary endpoint was observed in 124 of 143 patients (86.7%). One patient (0.7%) developed a small pericardial effusion 1-month post-procedure, not requiring intervention. CONCLUSION: The novel hexaspline PFA catheter demonstrated universal acute PVI with an excellent safety profile and promising 12-month freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias in an Asian/Chinese population with paroxysmal AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05114954.

Percutaneous mechanical support in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: hype or hope?

Catheter ablation (CA) has become an established treatment strategy for managing recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease. In recent years, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (PMCS) devices have been increasingly used intra-operatively to improve the ablation outcome. One indication would be rescue therapy for patients who develop haemodynamic deterioration during the ablation. However, more efforts are focused on identifying subjects who are at high risk of such deterioration and could benefit from the pre-emptive use of the PMCS. The third reason to use PMCS could be the inability to identify diffuse substrate, especially in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This paper reviews available experiences using various types of PMCS in different clinical scenarios. Although PMCS allows mapping during VT, it does not significantly influence acute outcomes and not convincingly long-term outcomes. On the contrary, the complication rate appears to be higher in PMCS cohorts. Our data suggest that even in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, the substrate modification can be performed without the need for general anaesthesia and risk of haemodynamic decompensation. In end-stage heart failure associated with the electrical storm, implantation of a left ventricular assist device (or PMCS with a transition to the left ventricular assist device) might be the preferred strategy before CA. In high-risk patients who are not potential candidates for these treatment options, radiotherapy could be considered as a bail-out treatment of recurrent VTs. These approaches should be studied in prospective trials.

Incremental Benefit of Stepwise Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Provocation During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The importance of nonpulmonary vein (PV) triggers for the initiation/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incremental benefit of provocative maneuvers for identifying non-PV triggers. METHODS: We included consecutive patients undergoing first-time AF ablation between 2020 and 2022. The provocation protocol included step 1, identification of spontaneous non-PV triggers after cardioversion of AF and/or during sinus rhythm; step 2, isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min); and step 3, atrial burst pacing to induce AF followed by cardioversion during residual or low-dose isoproterenol infusion or induce focal atrial tachycardia. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia. RESULTS: Of 1,372 patients included, 883 (64.4%) underwent the complete stepwise provocation protocol with isoproterenol infusion and burst pacing, 334 (24.3%) isoproterenol infusion only, 77 (5.6%) burst pacing only, and 78 (5.7%) no provocative maneuvers (only step 1). Overall, 161 non-PV triggers were found in 135 (9.8%) patients. Of these, 51 (31.7%) non-PV triggers occurred spontaneously, and the remaining 110 (68.3%) required provocative maneuvers for induction. Among those receiving the complete stepwise provocation protocol, there was a 2.2-fold increase in the number of patients with non-PV triggers after isoproterenol infusion, and the addition of burst pacing after isoproterenol infusion led to a total increase of 3.6-fold with the complete stepwise provocation protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of non-PV triggers require provocative maneuvers for induction. A stepwise provocation protocol consisting of isoproterenol infusion followed by burst pacing identifies a 3.6-fold higher number of patients with non-PV triggers.

Hybrid-Convergent Procedure or Pulsed Field Ablation in Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid-convergent radiofrequency (RF) ablation targeting pulmonary veins (PVs) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) has shown better arrhythmic outcomes than an endocardial-only RF strategy, despite higher rates of complications. Comparisons with extensive pulsed field ablation (PFA) are currently lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the hybrid-convergent RF vs PFA of PVs and LAPW in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive LSPAF patients, treated with 2-step hybrid-convergent RF ablation (hybrid group, n = 49) or with PFA of PVs and LAPW (PFA group, n = 44) were enrolled. Primary efficacy endpoint was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) recurrence after the 3-month blanking period, over a follow-up time of 12 months. Periprocedural adverse events and late complications during follow-up were deemed primary safety outcomes. RESULTS: The hybrid and PFA groups had similar baseline characteristics; mean age was hybrid 63.8 ± 10.6 years vs PFA 66.0 ± 7.4 years; P = 0.105. PV and LAPW ablation were acutely successful in all patients. Step 1 hybrid-epicardial procedures were longer than PFA (166 [Q1-Q3: 140-205] minutes vs 107.5 [Q1-Q3: 82.5-12] minutes; P < 0.01). At 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in ATA recurrences between groups (hybrid 36.7% vs PFA 40.9%; P = 0.680; log-rank at survival analysis P = 0.539). After adjusting for confounders, a larger left atrial volume and recurrences during the blanking-period were predictors of ATA recurrences after ablation, regardless of procedural technique employed. PFA showed a better safety profile with a lower rate of major periprocedural complications compared with hybrid ablation (12% vs 0%; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid-convergent and PFA share comparable arrhythmic outcomes in LSPAF, but hybrid-convergent ablation carries higher periprocedural risks.

Percutaneous mechanical support in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: hype or hope?

Catheter ablation (CA) has become an established treatment strategy for managing recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease. In recent years, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (PMCS) devices have been increasingly used intra-operatively to improve the ablation outcome. One indication would be rescue therapy for patients who develop haemodynamic deterioration during the ablation. However, more efforts are focused on identifying subjects who are at high risk of such deterioration and could benefit from the pre-emptive use of the PMCS. The third reason to use PMCS could be the inability to identify diffuse substrate, especially in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This paper reviews available experiences using various types of PMCS in different clinical scenarios. Although PMCS allows mapping during VT, it does not significantly influence acute outcomes and not convincingly long-term outcomes. On the contrary, the complication rate appears to be higher in PMCS cohorts. Our data suggest that even in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, the substrate modification can be performed without the need for general anaesthesia and risk of haemodynamic decompensation. In end-stage heart failure associated with the electrical storm, implantation of a left ventricular assist device (or PMCS with a transition to the left ventricular assist device) might be the preferred strategy before CA. In high-risk patients who are not potential candidates for these treatment options, radiotherapy could be considered as a bail-out treatment of recurrent VTs. These approaches should be studied in prospective trials.

Safety and efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, single-arm analysis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prevalent malignant tumor, and the commonly treatment modalities include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc. Currently, CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of cancers has been widely performed. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in NSCLC patients. Thirty-five NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study and all received CT-guided percutaneous RFA therapy. The outcome measures included the changes in forced respiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), total lung volume (TLC), lesion size and computed tomography (CT) values of the region of interest (ROI) before and after treatment. The main efficacy measures comprised complete tumor ablation and local recurrence after initial treatment, as well as the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) after 6 months of treatment. After receiving CT-guided percutaneous RFA therapy, the target lesion was effectively controlled and CT values gradually decreased. Besides, no significant changes were observed in the patient's lung function, postoperative complications were experienced by a total of 10 patients, primarily including pneumothorax, infection, lung hollowing. Fortunately, all these complications were successfully managed with appropriate treatment. Following the initial RFA treatment, 31 patients (88.57%) achieved complete ablation, while 6 patients experienced local recurrence. After 6 months of treatment, the ORR and DCR were found to be 68.57% and 82.86% respectively. CT-guided percutaneous RFA has demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with NSCLC at different stages, which represented a promising therapeutic modality.

Periprocedural acute haemodynamic decompensation during substrate-based ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: a rare and unpredictable event.

AIMS: Patients with structural heart disease (SHD) undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) are at considerable risk of periprocedural complications, including acute haemodynamic decompensation (AHD). The PAINESD score was proposed to predict the risk of AHD. The goal of this study was to validate the PAINESD score using the retrospective analysis of data from a large-volume heart centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who had their first radiofrequency CA for SHD-related VT between August 2006 and December 2020 were included in the study. Procedures were mainly performed under conscious sedation. Substrate mapping/ablation was performed primarily during spontaneous rhythm or right ventricular pacing. A purposely established institutional registry for complications of invasive procedures was used to collect all periprocedural complications that were subsequently adjudicated using the source medical records. Acute haemodynamic decompensation triggered by CA procedure was defined as intraprocedural or early post-procedural (<12 h) development of acute pulmonary oedema or refractory hypotension requiring urgent intervention. The study cohort consisted of 1124 patients (age, 63 ± 13 years; males, 87%; ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 67%; electrical storm, 25%; New York Heart Association Class, 2.0 ± 1.0; left ventricular ejection fraction, 34 ± 12%; diabetes mellitus, 31%; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 12%). Their PAINESD score was 11.4 ± 6.6 (median, 12; interquartile range, 6-17). Acute haemodynamic decompensation complicated the CA procedure in 13/1124 = 1.2% patients and was not predicted by PAINESD score with AHD rates of 0.3, 1.8, and 1.1% in subgroups by previously published PAINESD terciles (<9, 9-14, and >14). However, the PAINESD score strongly predicted mortality during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Primarily substrate-based CA of SHD-related VT performed under conscious sedation is associated with a substantially lower rate of AHD than previously reported. The PAINESD score did not predict these events. The application of the PAINESD score to the selection of patients for pre-emptive mechanical circulatory support should be reconsidered.