Direct Visualization of a Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy After Medical Management.

BACKGROUND Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy that can result in severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Medical, surgical, and minimally invasive therapies alone or in combination have been described in the literature, but the optimal treatment modality of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies is unknown. Limited information exists on the course of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy following treatment with cytotoxic agents. CASE REPORT We present a case of a woman with a history of multiple cesarean births that was provided with medical abortion for an unintended pregnancy. However, upon follow-up, the patient was found to have a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Following the diagnosis, she was treated by multi-dose systemic methotrexate-leucovorin and with ultrasound-guided intra-gestational sac injection of potassium chloride. After resolution of beta human gonadotropin levels, ultrasound follow-up revealed persistence of residual tissue in the cesarean scar. The patient elected for resection of the residual tissue with operative hysteroscopy. We report a novel hysteroscopic finding after medical treatment of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with intra-gestational sac injection of potassium chloride. CONCLUSIONS Direct visualization of the intra-abdominal cavity and intra-uterine cavity showed that combined medical management with systemic methotrexate and local potassium chloride injection is an effective treatment modality for live cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies, with minimal anatomical harm. Hysteroscopic resection offers a safe and effective approach for removal of persistence of residual tissue.

A 20 year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital - a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies account for < 10% of all ectopic pregnancies. Due to its rarity and wide variation in clinical practice, there is no guideline or consensus for its management. We reported our 20-year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all women admitted for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies from January 2003 to December 2022 in a tertiary hospital. Women with non-tubal ectopic pregnancies diagnosed by ultrasound or operation were included for analysis. RESULTS: Within the study period, 180 women were diagnosed to have non-tubal ectopic pregnancies at a mean gestation of 6.8 weeks. 16.7% (30/180) were conceived via assisted reproduction. Medical treatment was the first-line management option for 81 women, of which 75 (92.1%) women received intralesional methotrexate administered under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The success rate of intralesional methotrexate ranges from 76.5% to 92.3%. Intralesional methotrexate was successful even in cases with a positive fetal pulsation or with high human chorionic gonadotrophin levels up to 252605U/L. Twenty seven women were managed expectantly and 40 underwent surgery. Nine (11.1%), two (6.1%), and one (2.3%) women required surgery due to massive or recurrent bleeding following medical, expectant, or surgical treatment. Hysterotomy and uterine artery embolization were necessary to control bleeding in one Caesarean scar and one cervical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional methotrexate is more effective than systemic methotrexate and should be considered as first line medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. It has a high success rate in the management of unruptured non-tubal ectopic pregnancies even in the presence of fetal pulsations or high human chorionic gonadotrophin levels, but patients may require a prolonged period of monitoring. Close surveillance and readily available surgery were required due to the risk of heavy post-procedural intra-abdominal bleeding.

Efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of the first and second trimester abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: However, misoprostol is often used to terminate a pregnancy, but it can also cause side effects. Isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) can help the cervix mature by increasing the production of prostaglandin E2 and vasodilation. Considering that the results of studies in this field are contradictory, it is the purpose of this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal ISMN plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of first- and second-trimester abortions. METHOD: The search process was conducted for MEDLINE through the PubMed interface, Scopus, Web-of-Science, Science Direct, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until November 10, 2023. Our assessment of bias was based on version 2 of the risk-of-bias tool (RoB2) for randomized trials and our level of evidence quality was determined by GRADE. Meta-analysis of all data was carried out using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.1. RESULT: Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the systematic review and three in the meta-analysis, with mixed quality. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that in the second-trimester abortion, the inclusion of ISMN in conjunction with vaginal misoprostol results in a noteworthy reduction in the induction abortion interval, specifically by 4.21 h (95% CI: -7.45 to -0.97, P = 0.01). The addition of vaginal ISMN to misoprostol, compared to vaginal misoprostol alone, increased the odds of a completed abortion by 3.76 times. (95% CI: 1.08 to 13.15, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can offer valuable insights aimed at enhancing counseling and support for non-surgical methods of medication abortion within professional settings. Moreover, it improves the effectiveness of clinical treatment and reduces the occurrence of unnecessary surgical interventions in the abortion management protocol.

The effects of conservative and surgical approaches in tubal ectopic pregnancy on fertility.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment, expectant approaches, and surgical treatment options are available in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Regardless of the treatment, in addition to its effectiveness, the main concern is to limit the risk of relapse and preserve fertility. OBJECTIVES: Determine the impact of medical or surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy on future fertility. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Department of obstrtrics and gynecolgy at Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were treated for ectopic pregnancy between June 2016 and November 2019 were allocated into two groups. Expectant approach or medical treatment by methotrexate constituted the conservative treatment group while salpingectomy by laparoscopy indicated the surgical treatment group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fertility rates within two years following treatment were evaluated according to treatment options. SAMPLE SIZE: 202 patients. RESULTS: Of the 202 patients, 128 had medical treatment and 74 patients had surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy. Of 272 diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy, 70 were excluded for various reasons. Parity and unemployment rate was significantly higher in the surgical treatment (P=.006 and P=.12, respectively). Moreover, ectopic mass size and serum ß-hCG levels were significantly higher in the surgical treatment group (P<.001 and P<.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the conservative and surgical treatment groups in time to pregnancy (17.0 months vs 19.0 months, P=.255). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the conservative and surgical treatment groups with respect to history of infertility (P=.12). There were no significant differences between the conservative and surgical treatment groups in terms of live birth (51.6% vs 44.6%) and ectopic pregnancy (2.3% vs 1.4%) (P=.72 for both). There was no significant difference between the conservative and surgical treatment groups with respect to infertility rate (35.9% vs 41.9%, P=.72) and admittance to the IVF program (3.9% vs 6.8%, P=.39) following ectopic pregnancy treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive outcomes did not differ significantly in women undergoing expectant management, medical treatment, and surgery for ectopic pregnancy. This finding suggests that clinicians should not hesitate to act in favor of surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy even if there were concerns for future fertility. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.

Comparing the effectiveness of letrozole versus methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of two different regimens of Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, in the management of ectopic pregnancy compared to methotrexate. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 88 women diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy with a baseline level of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin under 3000 mIU/mL between June 30, 2023, and December 30, 2023, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Vali-e-Asr Hospital affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Participants were allocated into either methotrexate (n = 43), 5-day course Letrozole (n = 24), or 10-day course Letrozole (n = 21) treatments. The methotrexate group received a single dose of 50 mg/m2 dosage intramuscular methotrexate. The 5-day Letrozole group received a 2.5 mg Letrozole tablet three times daily for 5 days, whereas the 10-day Letrozole group received a 2.5 mg Letrozole tablet twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome was the treatment response, defined as the achievement of a negative serum beta-human chorionic level without the need for additional methotrexate treatment or surgery. The secondary outcomes were the need for additional methotrexate dose or laparoscopic surgery intervention. The trial protocol was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with code NCT05918718. RESULTS: The treatment response rates in methotrexate, 5-day Letrozole, and 10-day Letrozole groups were 76.7 %, 75.0 %, and 90.5 %, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups (P-value = 0.358). A total of 10 (23.3 %) patients from the methotrexate group, 3 (12.5 %) from the 5-day Letrozole group, and 2 (9.5 %) from the 10-day Letrozole group required an additional methotrexate dose, with no significant differences between the groups (P-value = 0.307). Furthermore, only 3 (12.5 %) patients, all from the 5-day Letrozole group, were suspected of tubal rupture and underwent surgery (P-value = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest Letrozole as a safe alternative to methotrexate in treating stable ectopic pregnancies, with a favorable treatment response rate. However, there is still a need for future larger studies to determine the applicability of Letrozole in the EP management. Also, the non-significant higher effectiveness of the 10-day Letrozole regimen than the 5-day Letrozole group underscores the need for future research to determine the optimal Letrozole regimen for the management of ectopic pregnancy.

The MISOPRED score: Development and validation of a clinical scoring system to predict the effectiveness of Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss has varied success demonstrated in previous studies. Incorporating predictors in a single clinical scoring system would be highly beneficial in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the accuracy of a scoring system to predict misoprostol treatment outcomes for managing early pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort and validation study. METHODS: Patients discharged from the gynecologic emergency department from 2013 to 2016, diagnosed with early pregnancy loss, who were treated with 800 mcg misoprostol, administrated vaginally were included. All were sonographically reevaluated within 48-72 hours. Patients in whom the gestational sac was not expelled or with endometrial lining >30 mm were offered a repeat dose and returned for reevaluation after seven days. A successful response was defined as complete expulsion. Clinical data were reviewed to identify predictors for successful responses. The scoring system was then retrospectively evaluated on a second cohort to evaluate its accuracy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors most predictive of treatment response. RESULTS: The development cohort included 126 patients. Six factors were found to be most predictive of misoprostol treatment effectiveness: nulliparity, prior complete spontaneous abortion, gestational age, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and mean sac diameter, yielding a score of 0-8 (the MISOPRED score), where 8 represents the highest-likelihood of success. The score was validated retrospectively with 119 participants. Successful response in the group with the lowest likelihood score (score 0-3) was 9%, compared with 82% in the highest likelihood score group (score 7-8). Using the MISOPRED score, approximately 15% of patients previously planned to receive misoprostol treatment can be referred for surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: MISOPRED score can be utilized as an adjunct tool for clinical decision-making in cases of Early pregnancy loss. To our knowledge, this is the first scoring system suggested to predict the success rate in these cases.

24-Hour Compared With 12-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 24-hour and 12-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol intervals for second-trimester medication abortion. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated to receive mifepristone either 24 hours or 12 hours before misoprostol administration. The primary outcome was the time from the first misoprostol administration to abortion (induction time). Secondary outcomes included the time from mifepristone to abortion (total abortion time); fetal expulsion percentages at 12, 24, and 48 hours after the first misoprostol dose; side effects proportion; and pain and satisfaction scores. A sample size of 40 per group (N=80) was planned to compare the 24- and 12-hour regimens. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled between July 2020 and June 2023, with 40 patients per group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median induction time was 9.5 hours (95% CI, 10.3-17.8 hours) and 12.5 hours (95% CI, 13.5-20.2 hours) in the 24- and 12-hour interval arms, respectively ( P =.028). Median total abortion time was 33.0 hours (95% CI, 34.2-41.9 hours) and 24.5 hours (95% CI, 25.7-32.4 hours) in the 24- and 12-hour interval groups, respectively ( P <.001). At 12 hours from misoprostol administration, 25 patients (62.5%) in the 24-hour arm and 18 patients (45.0%) in the 12-hour arm completed abortion ( P =.178). At 24 hours from misoprostol administration, 36 patients (90.0%) in the 24-hour arm and 30 patients (75.0%) in the 12-hour arm had complete abortion ( P =.139). The need for additional medication or surgical treatment for uterine evacuation, pain scores, side effects, and satisfaction levels were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: A 24-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol regimen for medication abortion in the second trimester provides a median 3-hour shorter induction time compared with the 12-hour interval. However, the median total abortion time was 8.5-hours longer in the 24-hour interval regimen. These findings can aid in shared decision making before medication abortion in the second trimester. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04160221.

How Effective Is Misoprostol Alone for Medication Abortion?

AbstractWith recent severe restrictions to abortion accessibility in the United States and a pending Supreme Court case challenging the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone, evidence-based strategies to protect and expand access to abortion care are needed. Two safe and effective regimens for medication abortion are widely used globally - misoprostol-only and misoprostol in combination with mifepristone. However, misoprostol-only regimens are rarely used in the United States. In 2023, the National Abortion Federation and the Society of Family Planning updated their recommended protocol for misoprostol-only for medication abortion to 800 µg of misoprostol administered buccally, sublingually, or vaginally every 3 hours for three or more doses. To characterize the data supporting this specific regimen, this article reviews the relevant literature to address the question of how effective misoprostol-only is for medication abortion. The authors conclude that the updated misoprostol regimen is highly effective and a potential strategy for expanding access to abortion.

Mifepristone and misoprostol in California pharmacies after modifications to the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program.

In January 2023, the Food & Drug Administration modified the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program regulating mifepristone to allow direct dispensation from retail pharmacies. In June 2023, we conducted a random, distributive survey of pharmacies in California using secret shopper methodology to investigate the feasibility of accessing mifepristone. One pharmacy had mifepristone immediately available (<24 hours), and misoprostol availability was limited. Accessibility to misoprostol varied by type of pharmacy (p < 0.01), but not by region. Even in a reproductive freedom state, access to mifepristone and misoprostol from outpatient retail pharmacies remains limited.

"That's a tricky one": Access to misoprostol for early pregnancy loss in retail pharmacies across Arizona.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the same-day availability of misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) at Arizona pharmacies. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a simulated-patient mixed methods study of Arizona pharmacies from October 2022 to February 2023, documenting misoprostol availability and describing pharmacy staff responses. RESULTS: Of 941 pharmacies included, 703 (75%) could fill a misoprostol prescription same day. Ability to fill prescriptions and reasons why the prescription could not be filled varied by pharmacy type. National chain pharmacies most frequently had misoprostol available but also most commonly reported policies restricting dispensing. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers exist to filling misoprostol prescriptions for early pregnancy loss in Arizona that could impact patient care.

Availability of mifepristone and misoprostol in Oregon pharmacies: A comparison by rural and urban status.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the availability of mifepristone and misoprostol at pharmacies in a state with protective abortion legislation and variation in access by rurality. STUDY DESIGN: Using a secret shopper survey, researchers attempted to contact all community pharmacies in Oregon and evaluate their mifepristone and misoprostol provisions. RESULTS: Among the 444 pharmacies surveyed, mifepristone was planned at 19.2%. Misoprostol was available at 77.5%, but stocking issues and medication ordering impact access, without significant differences by rurality. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy engagement and support are key to increasing access to these essential medicines, which may be improved through education and referral programs.

Comparison of single- and double-dose methotrexate protocols for treatment of pregnancy of unknown location.

OBJECTIVE: The use of various methotrexate (MTX) protocols for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy is well established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single- and double-dose MTX protocols for the treatment of pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland. Haemodynamically stable women with PUL were enrolled between January 2014 and September 2023. Demographics, gestational age and treatment outcomes were compared between women in the single-dose MTX group and women in the double-dose MTX group. The primary outcome was the success rate, measured as the number of women treated without surgical intervention. The secondary outcome was the number of days of MTX needed to achieve an appropriate decrease in beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (ß-hCG). RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven women (mean age 33 ± 1.8 years) with PUL were enrolled in the study, with an overall success rate of 89.1 %. Single- and double-dose MTX protocols were found to have comparable treatment success rates (93 % and 95 %, respectively). Women with lower initial serum ß-hCG (<2000 mIU/ml) had higher treatment efficacy compared with women with higher initial serum ß-hCG (96.5 % vs 71.4 %), regardless of protocol type. The length of hospital stay for the women treated with the single-dose MTX protocol was 1 day shorter compared with that for the women treated with the double-dose MTX protocol. CONCLUSION: Single- and double-dose MTX protocols have comparable efficacy and safety, and should be equally considered in women with PUL with initial ß-hCG < 2000 mIU/ml.

Medical management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol in emergency departments compared to a Complex Family Planning office: Implementation of a COVID-19 institutional policy change.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the implementation of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) in emergency departments (EDs) by comparing efficacy, complication, and follow-up rates for patients treated in EDs to the Complex Family Planning (CFP) outpatient office. STUDY DESIGN: In COVID-19's first wave, we expanded medical management of EPL to our EDs. This retrospective study evaluated 72 patients receiving mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, comparing treatment success, safety outcomes, and follow-up rates by location. RESULTS: Thirty-three (46%) patients received care in the ED and 39 (54%) at CFP. Treatment success was lower in EDs (23, 70%) compared to CFP (34, 87%), but after adjusting for insurance status and pregnancy type (miscarriage, uncertain viability, unknown location), this was not significant: adjusted odds ratio 0.48 (95% CI 0.13-1.81). More ED patients underwent emergent interventions (3 vs 0) including two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Two cases were attributed to misdiagnosis (cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies interpreted as incomplete miscarriages) and one to guideline nonadherence. No complications occurred in the CFP group. Follow-up rates were over 80% in both groups. More ED patients engaged in telehealth follow-up (67% vs 18%, p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this small sample, we observed a trend toward less successful treatment in the ED compared to the CFP office. Both correctly making uncommon diagnoses and adhering to new guidelines presented implementation challenges. IMPLICATIONS: Implementing mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL in our EDs achieved lower rates of pregnancy resolution compared to outpatient management. Complex uncommon diagnoses and implementing new care pathways in EDs may have contributed to complications and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Additional studies are needed to further quantify safety outcomes for EPL management in EDs.

Hysteroscopic subchorionic injection of methotrexate followed by laparoscopic excision of the gestational sac for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: an innovative dual approach of a challenging pathology.

OBJECTIVE: To describe an effective two-step surgical approach for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEPs). CSEPs occur at an estimated frequency of 1 in 1,800 pregnancies, constituting approximately 6% of ectopic pregnancies in women with a history of prior cesarean delivery [1, 2]. Despite numerous recommended therapeutic approaches, the most effective treatment strategy remains uncertain [3]. DESIGN: We present an innovative double-step technique for the management of a patient with a CSEP involving hysteroscopic subchorionic injection of methotrexate (MTX), followed by laparoscopic resection of the residual gestational sac and simultaneous repair of the uterine defect. SETTING: Academic tertiary hospital. PATIENT: A 34-year-old G2P1001 with a history of prior cesarean section presented at 10 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound revealed a gestational sac within the niche of the previous cesarean scar, confirming the diagnosis of a CSEP. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online, including on social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, among others), and other applicable sites. INTERVENTION: The initial treatment involved hysteroscopic administration of MTX within the placental intervillous spaces, ensuring precise medication delivery. The administered dose of MTX was 1 mg/kg. Following the normalization of beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (ß-hCG) levels, laparoscopic resection of the remaining gestational sac and reconstruction of the uterine wall defect were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We have implemented a management strategy focusing on ectopic pregnancy removal and addressing defect revision. The hysteroscopic approach allows for a clear assessment of the ectopic pregnancy and facilitates precise MTX administration, enhancing its effectiveness by increasing drug concentration within the placental intervillous space. Delaying surgical repair until after the ß-hCG levels have decreased reduces the risk of excessive bleeding during the procedure, as lower ß-hCG levels are associated with reduced vascularity at the ectopic site. Subsequent laparoscopic resection allows for complete removal of the remaining products of conception and repair of the defect, preserving the uterus and restoring normal anatomy. Compared to other surgical approaches, our two-step approach enables a more precise evaluation of placental implantation, making it a highly effective surgical method. RESULTS: We successfully managed a CSEP using a double-step technique. This involved hysteroscopic injection of subchorionic MTX, followed by laparoscopic resection of the residual gestational sac. Concurrently, we repaired the uterine defect. Both procedures were performed in an outpatient setting without complications detected during or after treatment. At the follow-up visit, the patient reported good health, and subsequent ultrasound confirmed an empty isthmocele. CONCLUSION: This sequential hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach represents a definitive and effective minimally invasive surgical option for the treatment of CSEP.

The Safety and Efficacy of a "No Touch" Abortion Program Implemented in the Greater Toronto Area During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of first-trimester "No Touch" medication abortion programs at 2 clinics in Toronto, Ontario during their early implementation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent virtual consultation for mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion between April 2020-August 2022 at 2 reproductive health clinics. In response to the pandemic, "No Touch" abortion protocols have been developed that align with the Canadian Protocol for the Provision of Medical Abortion via Telemedicine. Records were reviewed for demographic information, clinical course, investigations required, confirmation of complete abortion and adverse events. The primary outcome was complete medication abortion, defined as expulsion of the pregnancy without requiring uterine aspiration. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients had abortions initiated in the "No Touch" or "Low Touch" care pathways and had sufficient follow-up to determine outcomes. Of these patients, 92.8% (95% CI 89.7%-95.8%) had a complete medication abortion (n = 257) and 76.1% (n = 159) remained "No Touch" throughout their care. Investigations were performed for 102 participants before or after their abortion, classifying them as "Low Touch". Nineteen patients (6.9%) underwent uterine aspiration. The rate of adverse events was low, with 1 case of a missed ectopic pregnancy and 1 patient requiring hospitalization for endometritis. CONCLUSIONS: "No Touch" provision of mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion care was safe and effective with outcomes comparable to previous studies. These results provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of a "No Touch" approach in the Canadian context, which has the potential to reduce barriers to accessing abortion care.

Evaluation of the parameters in predicting single-dose methotrexate therapy success for ectopic pregnancy.

AIM: Methotrexate has demonstrated efficacy in treating ectopic pregnancies. This study explores factors influencing treatment success, focusing on laboratory and ultrasonographic findings, particularly the day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG level ratio. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted within patients diagnosed with tubal ectopic pregnancy. Patients' characteristics, ultrasound findings, laboratory data, and ß-hCG levels (days 1, 4, 7), and operation findings were reviewed. Women's characteristics were investigated who were treated with single dose of MTX (50 mg/m2). Patients who were performed surgery after MTX treatment were identified as MTX treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 439 women, 259 underwent surgery due to acute symptoms. Of those treated with MTX, 143 experienced treatment success, while 37 underwent surgery after MTX (MTX failure). Comparative analysis revealed significant differences in ß-hCG levels on admission (1128 and 4125 mIU/mL) and the day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG ratio (0.91 and 1.25). The overall MTX success rate was 79%, reaching 93% and 89% for ß-hCG levels <1000 mIU/mL and <2000 mIU/mL, respectively. Success dropped to 50% with levels exceeding 5000 mIU/mL. ROC analysis identified a crucial 2255 mIU/mL cut-off for ß-hCG (sensitivity 70.3% and specificity 68.5%) and a day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG ratio of 95.5% (sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 72.5%, positive predictive value 75.4%) for predicting MTX success. CONCLUSION: Establishing a ß-hCG cutoff can reduce hospital stay. The day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG ratio holds promise as a widely applicable predictor for MTX success or for determining MTX administration on day 4.

Retrospective cohort study comparing success of medical management of early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived with and without medical assistance.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rates of medical management using a combined mifepristone and misoprostol protocol in cases of early pregnancy loss (EPL) between women who conceived without medical assistance and those who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), after fresh or frozen embryo transfer, and evaluate for the predictive factors of success, time to first passage of tissue, and time to complete resolution of pregnancy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Women who presented with EPL below 13 weeks of gestation between June 2013 and July 2021 who were managed medically with mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally were included in the study. INTERVENTION(S): Medical management with mifepristone and misoprostol; conception without medical assistance vs. post-IVF, after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We evaluated overall success and performed subgroup analysis according to the mode of conception and compared fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfers for IVF pregnancies. In all groups, we also calculated success according to gestational age and compared the time to first passage of tissue. The potential predictive factors of treatment success were analyzed. The side effects and complications of treatment were recorded. RESULT(S): A total of 930 women were included in the study, 99 (11%) of whom achieved pregnancy after IVF. The overall success of medical treatment was 89% with no statistically significant difference according to the mode of conception (89% vs. 89%) or type of transfer (fresh 89% vs. frozen 89%). Only lower gestational age by sonography was independently predictive of treatment success, showing a negative regression coefficient of ß = -0.333 and an odds ratio of 0.717. The mean time to first passage of tissue was 5.0 ± 2.1 hours. Altogether, 666 women (72%) showed pregnancy resolution on the day of medication administration, an additional 110 women at 1-week follow-up, and a further 74 women after ≥4 weeks on ultrasound. CONCLUSION(S): Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is a highly successful treatment option that results in completed abortion in a timely fashion in both pregnancies conceived without medical assistance and those conceived after IVF.

Safety of methotrexate administration in women with pregnancy of unknown location at high risk of ectopic pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of current guidelines on methotrexate (MTX) administration in women with pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) who are considered to have a high risk of underlying ectopic pregnancy (EP), and to investigate whether implementation of these guidelines would result in inadvertent exposure to MTX of viable intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs). METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of consecutive clinically stable women who were classified with PUL at the early pregnancy unit of Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia, between 2007 and 2021. PUL was defined as a positive pregnancy test in the absence of signs of IUP or EP on transvaginal ultrasound. Patients with a PUL that behaved biochemically like an EP, but for which the location of pregnancy was not confirmed on ultrasound, were eligible for MTX to minimize the risk of subsequent tubal rupture. Criteria discussed in the guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were applied to the PUL database. The number of patients eligible to receive MTX and the number with an underlying viable IUP who would be inadvertently prescribed MTX were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 816 women with PUL were reviewed, of whom 724 had complete data and were included in the final analysis. Six patients had persistent PUL and the remaining 718 had a diagnosis of viable IUP, non-viable IUP, EP or failed PUL. According to the ACOG, ASRM, RCOG and NICE guidelines, the rate of MTX administration among patients with PUL would have been 2.76%, 4.56%, 0.41% and 35.36%, respectively. However, no persistent PUL would have received MTX according to the ACOG, ASRM and RCOG protocols (the NICE protocol identified patients with persistent PUL with a sensitivity of 100%), and the majority of MTX treatments were unnecessary because those patients were later classified as having non-viable IUP or failed PUL. Application of ACOG and ASRM guidance could result theoretically in inadvertent MTX administration to women with an underlying viable IUP at a rate of 4.1/1000 (3/724). CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines used to predict high risk of EP in the PUL population lead to inadvertent MTX administration to women with an underlying viable IUP. These guidelines should be used wisely to ensure that no wanted pregnancy is exposed to MTX. Women with PUL should be monitored carefully, and MTX should be used judiciously when the location of pregnancy is yet to be confirmed. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy treatment experiences of a tertiary care center.

AIM: To evaluate the incidence, the risk factors, and the treatment outcomes of Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies (NTEP) treated in a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 110 NTEP cases treated between 2014 and 2019 were included in the retrospective study. The study cohort was divided into 6 groups according to the pregnancy localization: 87 cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs), 7 ovarian pregnancies, 6 interstitial pregnancies, 4 rudimentary horn pregnancies, 4 abdominal pregnancies, and 2 cervical pregnancies. One woman rejected all treatment modalities. Demographic characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of each group were evaluated. RESULTS: In the study cohort, expectant management was performed in one (0.9%) woman. The methotrexate (MTX) treatment was administered in 29 (26.3%) women. Seventeen (15.4%) women underwent surgery, and 63 (57.2%) women underwent manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). A woman rejected all treatment modalities. Although 70.1% (n = 61) of CSPs were cured with MVA, 24.1% (n = 21) of them were treated with a single-dose MTX regimen in addition to MVA. The higher mean gestational sac size (33,9 ± 12,96 mm vs. 17,34 ± 9,87 mm), the higher mean gestational week (8,43 ± 1,16w vs. 6,66 ± 1,49w), the presence of fetal heartbeat (FHB) (90.5% vs. 26,2%) and the history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) (38.1% vs. 6,6%) were found in the CSPs with MVA treatment failure (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The management of NTEPs should be individualized according to the clinical and ultrasonographic findings. The size of the ectopic pregnancy mass, the gestational week, the presence of FHB, and the PID history were the predictive factors for the failure of MVA in CSP cases.