Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 1.797
Filtrer
1.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) ; 72(7): 610-617, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38945937

RÉSUMÉ

Agitation and psychosis are key behavioral and psychological symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). For family and caregivers of patients, such symptoms are critical factors of distress and increased burden, but medication to treat them is limited. In most cases, drugs for other neuropsychiatric diseases have been used to manage these symptoms in an off-label manner. Due to the complex pathological background of AD and limited clinical data, obtaining proof of concept for the treatment of these symptoms is challenging. However, in 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved brexpiprazole as the first and only drug to treat agitation in AD. Several other compounds have been evaluated in clinical situations. This review highlights recent pipelines being developed for agitation and psychosis for patients living with AD.


Sujet(s)
Maladie d'Alzheimer , Neuroleptiques , Agitation psychomotrice , Troubles psychotiques , Maladie d'Alzheimer/traitement médicamenteux , Maladie d'Alzheimer/diagnostic , Humains , Troubles psychotiques/traitement médicamenteux , Troubles psychotiques/diagnostic , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique
2.
J Int Med Res ; 52(6): 3000605241258473, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907362

RÉSUMÉ

The aim of this short narrative review was to evaluate the existing literature regarding the clinical use of ketamine among individuals with dementia, especially those with behavioral disturbances. PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid (Embase, APA PsycINFO, and MEDLINE) databases were searched for abstracts using the search terms "ketamine" AND "dementia." Only articles describing the use of ketamine in individuals with dementia were included. Articles that did not include individuals with dementia, did not use ketamine, were published in a non-English language, primarily described animal studies, or were reviews were excluded. Three case reports met the inclusion criteria. One described the use of subcutaneous ketamine for depression, one described the use of intramuscular ketamine for acute agitation, and one described the use of S-ketamine as anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy for depression and catatonia. No significant adverse effects were reported in any of the cases. Although the use of ketamine in the treatment of depression and agitation associated with dementia has potential, the current evidence remains limited. High-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm the observations of these case reports before ketamine can be used to treat behavioral disturbances in individuals with dementia.


Sujet(s)
Démence , Kétamine , Kétamine/usage thérapeutique , Kétamine/administration et posologie , Humains , Démence/traitement médicamenteux , Dépression/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Électroconvulsivothérapie/méthodes
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 81: 111-115, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733663

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient monitoring systems provide critical information but often produce loud, frequent alarms that worsen patient agitation and stress. This may increase the use of physical and chemical restraints with implications for patient morbidity and autonomy. This study analyzes how augmenting alarm thresholds affects the proportion of alarm-free time and the frequency of medications administered to treat acute agitation. METHODS: Our emergency department's patient monitoring system was modified on June 28, 2022 to increase the tachycardia alarm threshold from 130 to 150 and to remove alarm sounds for several arrhythmias, including bigeminy and premature ventricular beats. A pre-post study was performed lasting 55 days before and 55 days after this intervention. The primary outcome was change in number of daily patient alarms. The secondary outcomes were alarm-free time per day and median number of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine medications administered per day. The safety outcome was the median number of patients transferred daily to the resuscitation area. We used quantile regression to compare outcomes between the pre- and post-intervention period and linear regression to correlate alarm-free time with the number of sedating medications administered. RESULTS: Between the pre- and post-intervention period, the median number of alarms per day decreased from 1332 to 845 (-37%). This was primarily driven by reduced low-priority arrhythmia alarms from 262 to 21 (-92%), while the median daily census was unchanged (33 vs 32). Median hours per day free from alarms increased from 1.0 to 2.4 (difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). The median number of sedating medications administered per day decreased from 14 to 10 (difference - 4, 95% CI -1 to -7) while the number of escalations in level of care to our resuscitation care area did not change significantly. Multivariable linear regression showed a 60-min increase of alarm-free time per day was associated with 0.8 (95% CI 0.1-1.4) fewer administrations of sedating medication while an additional patient on the behavioral health census was associated with 0.5 (95% CI 0.0-1.1) more administrations of sedating medication. CONCLUSION: A reasonable change in alarm parameter settings may increase the time patients and healthcare workers spend in the emergency department without alarm noise, which in this study was associated with fewer doses of sedating medications administered.


Sujet(s)
Alarmes cliniques , Service hospitalier d'urgences , Agitation psychomotrice , Humains , Mâle , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Neuroleptiques/administration et posologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Benzodiazépines/usage thérapeutique , Benzodiazépines/administration et posologie , Monitorage physiologique/méthodes , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/usage thérapeutique , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/administration et posologie
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 81: 10-15, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626643

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Patients exhibiting signs of hyperactive delirium with severe agitation (HDSA) may require sedating medications for stabilization and safe transport to the hospital. Determining the patient's weight and calculating the correct weight-based dose may be challenging in an emergency. A fixed dose ketamine protocol is an alternative to the traditional weight-based administration, which may also reduce dosing errors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of adverse events following pre-hospital ketamine administration for HDSA. METHODS: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) records from four agencies were searched for prehospital ketamine administration. Cases were included if a 250 mg dose of ketamine was administered on standing order to an adult patient for clinical signs consistent with HDSA. Protocols allowed for a second 250 mg dose of ketamine if the first dose was not effective. Both the 250 mg initial dose and the total prehospital dose were analyzed for weight based dosing and adverse events. RESULTS: Review of 132 cases revealed 60 cases that met inclusion criteria. Patients' median weight was 80 kg (range: 50-176 kg). No patients were intubated by EMS, one only requiring suction, three required respiratory support via bag valve mask (BVM). Six (10%) patients were intubated in the emergency department (ED) including the three (5%) supported by EMS via BVM, three (5%) others who were sedated further in the ED prior to requiring intubation. All six patients who were intubated were discharged from the hospital with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 score. The weight-based dosing equivalent for the 250 mg initial dose (OR: 2.62, CI: 0.67-10.22) and the total prehospital dose, inclusive of the 12 patients that were administered a second dose, (OR: 0.74, CI: 0.27, 2.03), were not associated with the need for intubation. CONCLUSION: The 250 mg fixed dose of ketamine was not >5 mg/kg weight-based dose equivalent for all patients in this study. Although a second 250 mg dose of ketamine was permitted under standing orders, only 12 (20%) of the patients were administered a second dose, none experienced an adverse event. This indicates that the 250 mg initial dose was effective for 80% of the patients. Four patients with prehospital adverse events likely related to the administration of ketamine were found. One required suction, three (5%) requiring BVM respiratory support by EMS were subsequently intubated upon arrival in the ED. All 60 patients were discharged from the hospital alive. Further research is needed to determine an optimal single administration dose for ketamine in patients exhibiting signs of HDSA, if employing a standardized fixed dose medication protocol streamlines administration, and if the fixed dose medication reduces the occurrence of dosage errors.


Sujet(s)
Délire avec confusion , Services des urgences médicales , Kétamine , Agitation psychomotrice , Humains , Kétamine/administration et posologie , Kétamine/usage thérapeutique , Délire avec confusion/traitement médicamenteux , Services des urgences médicales/méthodes , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Études rétrospectives , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Anesthésiques dissociatifs/administration et posologie , Anesthésiques dissociatifs/usage thérapeutique , Poids
5.
J Affect Disord ; 358: 353-360, 2024 Aug 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657773

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Hostility, irritability, and agitation are common in patients with bipolar I disorder. Post hoc analyses evaluated the effect of cariprazine on these symptoms in patients with bipolar I mania. METHODS: Data were pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 cariprazine trials in adults with bipolar I manic/mixed episodes (NCT00488618, NCT01058096, NCT01058668); pooled cariprazine doses (3-12 mg/d) were analyzed. Patients were categorized into hostility/irritability and agitation subgroups by baseline scores: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) irritability and disruptive-aggressive behavior items score ≥ 2; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) hostility item ≥ 2; PANSS-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) total score ≥ 14 and score ≥ 4 on ≥ 1 individual item. Changes from baseline to week 3 in hostility/irritability- and agitation-related outcomes were evaluated. Adjustments were made for the presence of other manic symptoms, sedation, and akathisia. RESULTS: Most patients met subgroup inclusion criteria (YMRS hostility = 930; PANSS hostility = 841, PANSS-EC agitation = 486). In the YMRS subgroup, least squares mean differences in change from baseline were statistically significant for cariprazine versus placebo on YMRS hostility/irritability-related items (irritability [-0.93], disruptive-aggressive behavior [-0.79], combined [-1.75]; P ≤ 0.001 each), YMRS total score (-5.92, P ≤ 0.0001), and all individual YMRS items (-0.25 to -0.93, P ≤ 0.0001); differences remained significant after adjustment for other manic symptoms, sedation, and akathisia. Differences in PANSS hostility and PANSS-EC subgroups were significant for cariprazine versus placebo (P ≤ 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Post hoc analysis. CONCLUSION: Cariprazine demonstrated specific antihostility/irritability and anti-agitation effects in patients with manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder and baseline hostility, irritability, or agitation.


Sujet(s)
Trouble bipolaire , Hostilité , Humeur irritable , Manie , Pipérazines , Agitation psychomotrice , Humains , Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/étiologie , Mâle , Humeur irritable/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Femelle , Adulte , Pipérazines/usage thérapeutique , Méthode en double aveugle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Manie/traitement médicamenteux , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Résultat thérapeutique , Agressivité/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques
7.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 38(2): 149-152, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484176

RÉSUMÉ

Alpha-2 agonists are under-recognized for their class effects yet offer potential benefit in specialty palliative care via decreasing sympathetic output, inducing sedation, and modulating pain. Especially in clinical contexts where agitation predominates and patients are intolerant of oral medication route, transdermal medication delivery is advantageous. We report a case of agitated behaviors in setting of mixed Alzheimer/vascular-type dementia limiting hospital discharge to nursing facility that were ameliorated with transdermal clonidine. We suggest palliative clinicians routinely conceptualize the seemingly disparate alpha-2 agonists as a class for effective symptom palliation especially as new clinical evidence becomes available.


Sujet(s)
Administration par voie cutanée , Agonistes des récepteurs alpha-2 adrénergiques , Clonidine , Agitation psychomotrice , Humains , Clonidine/administration et posologie , Clonidine/usage thérapeutique , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agonistes des récepteurs alpha-2 adrénergiques/administration et posologie , Soins palliatifs/méthodes , Mâle , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Maladie d'Alzheimer/traitement médicamenteux
8.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(3): 250-257, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489589

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: It is still not well known whether antipsychotic monotherapy versus polypharmacy differs in terms of efficacy in the emergency department (ED) utilization, presentation with agitation/aggression, and rehospitalization in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) patients. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy for these outcomes in the real world. METHODS/PROCEDURES: The study was conducted with electronic health records of 669 SSD patients admitted to the ED. Patients were evaluated in 4 groups according to antipsychotic use at the first admission to ED: antipsychotic noncompliance for more than 90 days, antipsychotic noncompliance for 15 to 90 days, antipsychotic monotherapy, and polypharmacy. All patients followed up for at least 1 year after index admission. The primary outcomes determined an association between antipsychotic monotherapy versus polypharmacy and all-cause psychiatric hospitalization between the groups after index admission in the SSD. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The groups, including patients with antipsychotic noncompliance, had higher ED visits, more hospitalizations, and more admissions with agitation/aggression compared with antipsychotic monotherapy or polypharmacy. However, no differences were found between monotherapy and polypharmacy groups regarding these outcomes. In addition, there was no difference in the risk of hospitalization in monotherapy antipsychotic users compared with polypharmacy users. Patients discharged with monotherapy or polypharmacy also had similar rehospitalization rates at follow-up. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: There is no positive evidence that recommending polypharmacy over antipsychotic monotherapy is superior with regard to the resulting frequency of ED visits, ED admissions with agitation/aggression, hospitalization, and rehospitalization. In this context, antipsychotic monotherapy may be preferred over polypharmacy in patients who are not resistant to treatment.


Sujet(s)
Neuroleptiques , Service hospitalier d'urgences , Polypharmacie , Schizophrénie , Humains , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Neuroleptiques/administration et posologie , Femelle , Mâle , Schizophrénie/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériques , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Réadmission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Adhésion au traitement médicamenteux/statistiques et données numériques , Agressivité/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Études rétrospectives , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux
10.
CNS Drugs ; 38(4): 239-254, 2024 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502289

RÉSUMÉ

Drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs) are associated with use of dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBAs), including antipsychotics. The most common forms are drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP), dystonia, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Although rare, neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially life-threatening consequence of DRBA exposure. Recommendations for anticholinergic use in patients with DIMDs were developed on the basis of a roundtable discussion with healthcare professionals with extensive expertise in DIMD management, along with a comprehensive literature review. The roundtable agreed that "extrapyramidal symptoms" is a non-specific term that encompasses a range of abnormal movements. As such, it contributes to a misconception that all DIMDs can be treated in the same way, potentially leading to the misuse and overprescribing of anticholinergics. DIMDs are neurobiologically and clinically distinct, with different treatment paradigms and varying levels of evidence for anticholinergic use. Whereas evidence indicates anticholinergics can be effective for DIP and dystonia, they are not recommended for TD, akathisia, or NMS; nor are they supported for preventing DIMDs except in individuals at high risk for acute dystonia. Anticholinergics may induce serious peripheral adverse effects (e.g., urinary retention) and central effects (e.g., impaired cognition), all of which can be highly concerning especially in older adults. Appropriate use of anticholinergics therefore requires careful consideration of the evidence for efficacy (e.g., supportive for DIP but not TD) and the risks for serious adverse events. If used, anticholinergic medications should be prescribed at the lowest effective dose and for limited periods of time. When discontinued, they should be tapered gradually.


Sujet(s)
Neuroleptiques , Dystonie , Troubles dystoniques , Troubles de la motricité , Syndrome malin des neuroleptiques , Dyskinésie tardive , Humains , Sujet âgé , Dystonie/induit chimiquement , Dystonie/traitement médicamenteux , Antagonistes cholinergiques/effets indésirables , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Troubles de la motricité/traitement médicamenteux , Troubles de la motricité/étiologie , Dyskinésie tardive/induit chimiquement , Dyskinésie tardive/traitement médicamenteux , Neuroleptiques/effets indésirables
11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301034

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: The prompt effective treatment of acute agitation among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder can alleviate distressing symptoms for the patient and decrease the risk of escalation to aggression and the potential for serious harm to the patient, health care providers, and others.Observations: A commonly used approach for the management of acute agitation has been the intramuscular administration of antipsychotic medications and/or benzodiazepines. However, US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments with alternative routes of delivery now include inhaled loxapine powder and, more recently, dexmedetomidine sublingual film. Two formulations of intranasal olanzapine for acute agitation are in development.Conclusions and Relevance: Intranasal formulations offer the potential for favorable pharmacokinetics and onset of action combined with ease of delivery obviating the need for injections and are thus consistent with patient-centered factors such as preference and self-administration. In this review, alternative methods of medication delivery are discussed, with an emphasis on the potential for intranasal administration to treat acute agitation in adult patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(1):23nr03596. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.


Sujet(s)
Neuroleptiques , Trouble bipolaire , Loxapine , Schizophrénie , Adulte , Humains , Schizophrénie/complications , Schizophrénie/traitement médicamenteux , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Trouble bipolaire/complications , Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/étiologie , Loxapine/effets indésirables
12.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry ; 65(3): 271-286, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309683

RÉSUMÉ

Acute disturbance is a broad term referring to escalating behaviors secondary to a change in mental state, such as agitation, aggression, and violence. Available management options include de-escalation techniques and rapid tranquilization, mostly via parenteral formulations of medication. While the intramuscular route has been extensively studied in a range of clinical settings, the same cannot be said for intravenous (IV); this is despite potential benefits, including rapid absorption and complete bioavailability. This systematic review analyzed existing evidence for effectiveness and safety of IV medication for management of acute disturbances. It followed a preregistered protocol (PROSPERO identification CRD42020216456) and is reported following the guidelines set by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. APA PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched for eligible interventional studies up until May 30th, 2023. Data analysis was limited to narrative synthesis since primary outcome measures varied significantly. Results showed mixed but positive results for the effectiveness of IV dexmedetomidine, lorazepam, droperidol, and olanzapine. Evidence was more limited for IV haloperidol, ketamine, midazolam, chlorpromazine, and valproate. There was no eligible data on the use of IV clonazepam, clonidine, diazepam, diphenhydramine, propranolol, ziprasidone, fluphenazine, carbamazepine, or promethazine. Most studies reported favorable adverse event profiles, though they are unlikely to have been sufficiently powered to pick up rare serious events. In most cases, evidence was of low or mixed quality, accentuating the need for further standardized, large-scale, multi-arm randomized controlled trials with homogeneous outcome measures. Overall, this review suggests that IV medications may offer an effective alternative parenteral route of administration in acute disturbance, particularly in general hospital settings.


Sujet(s)
Administration par voie intraveineuse , Agitation psychomotrice , Humains , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agressivité/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Neuroleptiques/administration et posologie , Neuroleptiques/effets indésirables , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Études prospectives
14.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 34(1): 42-51, 2024 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377518

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction: Escitalopram is an effective and generally well-tolerated antidepressant, but children of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) may be at increased risk for adverse events associated with antidepressants, including increased irritability, restlessness, impulsivity, and manic symptoms. This risk may be influenced by polymorphisms in genes encoding cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP2C19 or CYP2D6), the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4), and the serotonin receptor 2A subtype (HTR2A). We explored whether gene-drug interactions influence the emergence of adverse events in depressed and/or anxious youth with a family history of BD. Materials and Methods: Children and adolescents aged 12-17 years with a first-degree relative with bipolar I disorder were treated with escitalopram and monitored for adverse effects, underwent pharmacogenetic testing, and provided serum escitalopram levels. Emergence of adverse events was determined by study clinicians, and symptoms were tracked using the Treatment-Emergent Activation and Suicidality Assessment Profile (TEASAP) and Pediatric Adverse Events Rating Scale. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines were used to determine CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 phenotypes. Results: Slower CYP2C19 metabolizers had greater dose-normalized 24-hour area under the curve (AUC0-24; p = 0.025), trough concentrations (Ctrough; p = 0.013), and elimination half-lives (t1/2; p < 0.001). CYP2D6 phenotype was not significantly associated with any pharmacokinetic parameter. Slower CYP2D6 metabolizers had increased TEASAP akathisia (p = 0.015) scores. HTR2A A/A and A/G genotypes were associated with increased TEASAP "self-injury, suicidality, and harm to others" subscale scores (p = 0.017). Escitalopram maximum concentration, AUC0-24, CYP2C19 phenotype, and SLC6A4 genotype were not associated with adverse events. Conclusions: CYP2C19 phenotype influences escitalopram pharmacokinetics whereas CYP2D6 phenotype does not. Slower CYP2D6 metabolism was associated with increased akathisia, and HTR2A A/A or A/G genotypes were associated with increased risk of self-harm or harm to others. Larger cohorts are needed to identify associations between genetic test results and antidepressant-associated adverse events. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02553161.


Sujet(s)
Trouble bipolaire , Citalopram , Humains , Adolescent , Enfant , Citalopram/effets indésirables , Escitalopram , Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Trouble bipolaire/génétique , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/génétique , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/génétique , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/métabolisme , Pharmacogénétique , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Antidépresseurs/usage thérapeutique , Génotype , Transporteurs de la sérotonine/génétique
15.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(1)2024 Jan 10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38199660

RÉSUMÉ

Akathisia is a subjective feeling of restlessness that often results in a compulsion to move. Drug-related causes are the most common aetiologies. It can often be confused with restless legs syndrome (RLS). We describe a case of valproate-induced akathisia that improved with drug cessation. This case reports a rare but treatable adverse effect of sodium valproate and highlights the importance of differentiating akathisia from RLS.


Sujet(s)
Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments , Agitation psychomotrice , Humains , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/étiologie , Acide valproïque/effets indésirables , Confusion
16.
Ann Pharmacother ; 58(1): 54-64, 2024 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37119212

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review the available literature for dexmedetomidine sublingual film use in the treatment of acute agitation associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed (January 2017-March 2023) and EMBASE (January 2017-March 2023) was performed using the terms: Igalmi, dexmedetomidine, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and agitation. Additional information sources include ClinicalTrials.gov, scientific posters, and articles identified through review of references from clinical trials publications. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant English-language articles conducted in humans were considered, with a preference for phase 3 clinical trials. Trial analyses and articles discussing pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were also evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Dexmedetomidine sublingual film was evaluated for use in schizophrenia in the SERENITY 1 pivotal trial and for bipolar disorders in the SERENITY 2 pivotal trial. Both studies found treatment of mild to moderate agitation with dexmedetomidine sublingual film 180 and 120 µg to be superior to placebo in reducing the severity of agitation. Treatment effect was seen as early as 20 minutes. Somnolence was the most common adverse effect in both studies. Cardiovascular adverse effects were mild and transient in most cases. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Dexmedetomidine sublingual film is a new and novel treatment for agitation and gives clinicians an alternative to antipsychotic and benzodiazepine use. It has advantageous properties including its noninvasive route of administration, fast absorption, and rapid onset of effect. Cost may limit its use. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine sublingual film provides an alternative approach to treatment of acute agitation in adults with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders based on both mechanism of action and route of administration.


Sujet(s)
Neuroleptiques , Trouble bipolaire , Dexmédétomidine , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments , Schizophrénie , Adulte , Humains , Schizophrénie/complications , Schizophrénie/traitement médicamenteux , Trouble bipolaire/complications , Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Trouble bipolaire/induit chimiquement , Dexmédétomidine/effets indésirables , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/étiologie , Neuroleptiques/effets indésirables , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments/complications
18.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 46(1): 177-185, 2024 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071694

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Agitation is a common clinical problem encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). Treatment options are based on clinical experience and sparse quality literature. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the effect of valproic acid (VPA) as adjuvant treatment for agitation in the ICU, identify predictors of response to VPA and evaluate the independent effect of VPA on agitation compared to standard of care (SOC). METHOD: This retrospective single center observational study evaluated adult patients admitted to the ICU for whom a psychiatric consultation was requested for agitation management, with agitation defined as a Richmond Agitation Sedation Score of 2 or greater. A descriptive analysis of the proportion of agitation-free patients per day of follow-up, the incidence of agitation-related-events, as well as the evolution of co-medications use over time are presented. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of VPA response, defined as being agitation-free on Day 7 and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the independent effect of VPA as adjuvant therapy for agitation in the critically ill. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five patients were included in the study with 78 receiving VPA. The percentage of agitation-free patients on VPA was 6.5% (5/77) on Day 1, 14.1% (11/78) on Day 3 and 39.5% (30/76) on Day 7. Multivariate regression model for clinical and demographic variables identified female gender as predictor of response on Day 7 (OR 6.10 [1.18-31.64], p = 0.03). The independent effect of VPA was non-significant when compared to SOC. CONCLUSION: Although VPA used as adjuvant treatment was associated with a decrease in agitation, its effect when compared to SOC did not yield significant results.


Sujet(s)
Agitation psychomotrice , Acide valproïque , Adulte , Humains , Femelle , Acide valproïque/usage thérapeutique , Études rétrospectives , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/épidémiologie , Unités de soins intensifs , Orientation vers un spécialiste
20.
Alzheimers Dement ; 20(3): 1797-1806, 2024 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38116916

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: iWHELD is a digital person-centered care program for people with dementia in nursing homes adapted for remote delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A 16-week two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial in 149 UK nursing homes compared iWHELD with treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcome was the overall quality of life with secondary outcomes of agitation and psychotropic use. RESULTS: iWHELD conferred benefit to quality of life on the primary (F = 4.3, p = 0.04) and secondary measures of quality of life (F = 6.45, p = 0.01) and reduced psychotropic medication use (χ2  = 4.08, p = 0.04) with no worsening of agitation. Benefit was seen in participants who contracted COVID-19, those with agitation at baseline, and those taking psychotropic medications. DISCUSSION: iWHELD confers benefits to quality of life and key measures of well-being, can be delivered during the challenging conditions of a pandemic, and should be considered for use alongside any emerging pharmacological treatment for neuropsychiatric symptoms. HIGHLIGHTS: iWHELD is the only remote, digital delivery nursing home training programme for dementia care iWHELD improved quality of life in people with dementia and reduced antipsychotic use without worsening of agitation Residents who contracted Covid-19 during the study also experienced benefits from iWHELD iWHELD offers a valuable, pandemic-safe tool for improving dementia care.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Démence , Humains , Sujet âgé , Pandémies , Maisons de retraite médicalisées , Qualité de vie , Démence/diagnostic , COVID-19/complications , Maisons de repos , Soins centrés sur le patient , Agitation psychomotrice/traitement médicamenteux , Agitation psychomotrice/diagnostic
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...