A reporter virus particle seroneutralization assay for tick-borne encephalitis virus overcomes ELISA limitations.

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus is the most prevalent tick-transmitted orthoflavivirus in Europe. Due to the nonspecific nature of its symptoms, TBE is primarily diagnosed by ELISA-based detection of specific antibodies in the patient serum. However, cross-reactivity between orthoflaviviruses complicates the diagnosis. Specificity issues may be mitigated by serum neutralization assays (SNT), although the handling of clinically relevant orthoflaviviruses requires biosafety level (BSL) 3 conditions and they have highly divergent viral kinetics and cell tropisms. In the present study, we established a reporter virus particle (RVP)-based SNT in which the infectivity is measured by luminescence and that can be performed under BSL-2 conditions. The RVP-based SNT for TBEV exhibited a highly significant correlation with the traditional virus-based SNT (R2 = 0.8637, p < 0.0001). The RVP-based assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI: 79.7%-97.4%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 81.6%-100%). We also tested the cross-reactivity of serum samples in RVP-based assays against other orthoflaviviruses (yellow fever virus, dengue virus type 2, Zika virus, West Nile virus and Japanese encephalitis virus). Interestingly, all serum samples which had tested TBEV-positive by ELISA but negative by RVP-based SNT were reactive for antibodies against other orthoflaviviruses. Thus, the RVP-based seroneutralization assay provides an added value in clinical diagnostics as well as in epidemiological studies.

Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and Opisthorchis viverrini coinfections: insights into immune responses and clinical outcomes.

The effects of co-infections with SARS-CoV-2 and parasitic diseases have been little investigated in terms of immune response, disease dynamics, and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to explore the impact of co-infection with Opisthorchis viverrini and SARS-CoV-2 on the immune response concerning clinical symptoms and the severity of pulmonary abnormalities. A cross-sectional study was conducted, including healthy participants as controls, participants with opisthorchiasis, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a co-infection group with both diseases. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection were assessed based on clinical parameters and severity of pulmonary abnormalities, whereas opisthorchiasis burden was evaluated by eggs-per-gram (EPG) counts. Immune responses were assessed by measuring levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, and neutralizing antibody against SARS-CoV-2. In the co-infected group, clinical parameters and hospitalization rates were lower than in the SARS-CoV-2 group. Pulmonary abnormalities, such as bronchial fibrosis, were commonly observed in the SARS-CoV-2 group, leading to hospitalization in some cases. Participants with opisthorchiasis had higher IFN-γ levels than healthy individuals. IFN-γ levels were significantly lower in the co-infection group compared with the SARS-CoV-2 group (P = 0.002). There was a significant (P = 0.044) positive correlation between RBD-specific IgG and percent neutralization levels in the SARS-CoV-2 group. Levels of both were somewhat lower (not statistically significant) in the co-infection group. A negative correlation was observed between opisthorchiasis burden (EPG counts) and IFN-γ and RBD-specific IgG levels in the co-infected group. Following vaccination, the increase in IgG levels against the RBD protein was significantly lower in the co-infected group than in the SARS-CoV-2 group. These results suggest that O. viverrini infection suppresses immune responses and may lead to a reduction in severity in cases of SARS-CoV-2 co-infection.

Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of CoronaVac® in children and adolescents aged 6 months to 17 years: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial.

Safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 for children and adolescents are needed. This international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial assessed the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of CoronaVac® in children and adolescents (NCT04992260). The study was carried out in Chile, South Africa, Malaysia, and the Philippines. The enrollment ran from September 10, 2021 to March 25, 2022. For efficacy assessment, the median follow-up duration from 14 days after the second dose was 169 days. A total of 11,349 subjects were enrolled. Two 3-µg injections of CoronaVac® or placebo were given 28 days apart. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of the CoronaVac®. The secondary endpoints were the immunogenicity and safety. The vaccine efficacy was 21.02% (95% CI: 1.65, 36.67). The level of neutralizing antibody in the vaccine group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (GMT: 390.80 vs. 62.20, P <0.0001). Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate. All the severe adverse events were determined to be unrelated to the investigational products. In conclusion, in the Omicron-dominate period, a two-dose schedule of 3 µg CoronaVac® was found to be safe and immunogenic, and showed potential against symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy children and adolescents.

Immune Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in Elite Athletes.

Purpose: This study analyses the immune response of elite athletes after COVID-19 vaccination with double-dose mRNA and a single-dose vector vaccine. Methods: Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titers, neutralizing activity, CD4 and CD8 T-cells were examined in blood samples from 72 athletes before and after vaccination against COVID-19 (56 mRNA (BNT162b2 / mRNA-1273), 16 vector (Ad26.COV.2) vaccines). Side effects and training time loss was also recorded. Results: Induction of IgG antibodies (mRNA : 5702 BAU/ml ; 4343 BAU/ml (hereafter: median), vector: 61 BAU/ml ; 52 BAU/ml, p<0.01), their neutralizing activity (99.7% ; 10.6%, p<0.01), and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4 T-cells (0.13% ; 0.05% ; p<0.01) after mRNA double-dose vaccines was significantly more pronounced than after a single-dose vector vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD8 T-cell levels after a vector vaccine (0.15%) were significantly higher than after mRNA vaccines (0.02%; p<0.01). When athletes who had initially received the vector vaccine were boostered with an mRNA vaccine, IgG antibodies (to 3456 BAU/ml; p<0.01), neutralizing activity (to 100%; p<0.01), CD4 (to 0.13%; p<0.01) and CD8 T-cells (to 0.43%; p<0.01) significantly increased. When compared with dual-dose mRNA regimen, IgG antibody response was lower (p<0.01), the neutralizing activity (p<0.01) and CD8 T-cell (p<0.01) response higher and no significant difference in CD4 T-cell response (p=0.54) between the two regimens. Cumulative training loss (3 days) did not significantly differ between vaccination regimens (p=0.46). Conclusion: mRNA and vector vaccines against SARSCoV-2 appear to induce different patterns of immune response in athletes. Lower immune induction after a single-shot vector vaccine was clearly optimized by a heterologous booster. Vaccine reactions were mild and short-lived.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics after primary vaccination with two-dose inactivated whole-virus vaccine, heterologous mRNA-1273 vaccine booster, and Omicron breakthrough infection in Indonesian health care workers.

BACKGROUND: Data on the dynamics and persistence of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after primary vaccination with two-dose inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) are limited. This study evaluated the sequential effects of prior infection, heterologous boosting with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and the occurrence of Omicron vaccine-breakthrough infection (VBI) thereafter. METHODS: We evaluated anti-spike IgG (Abbott) and neutralising (cPASS/GenScript) antibody (nAb) titers up to one year after mRNA-1273 boost in two-dose-CoronaVac-primed Indonesian healthcare workers (August 2021-August 2022). We used linear mixed modeling to estimate the rate of change in antibody levels, and logistic regression to examine associations between antibody levels and VBI. RESULTS: Of 138 participants, 52 (37.7%) had a prior infection and 78 (56.5%) received an mRNA-1273 booster. After two-dose CoronaVac, antibody titers had significantly declined within 180 days, irrespective of prior infection. After mRNA-1273 booster, anti-spike IgG (1.47% decline/day) and Omicron B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs declined between day 28-90, and IgG titers plateaued between day 90-360. During the BA.1/BA.2 wave (February-March 2022), 34.6% (27/78) of individuals experienced a VBI (median 181 days after mRNA-1273), although none developed severe illness. VBI was associated with low pre-VBI anti-spike IgG and B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs, which were restored post-VBI. CONCLUSIONS: mRNA-1273 booster after two-dose CoronaVac did not prevent BA.1/BA.2 VBI. Periodic vaccine boosters may be warranted against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Virus Neutralization Test for Detecting and Quantifying Serum-Neutralizing Antibodies to Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) (Serotypes 1, 2, and 4-8).

The virus neutralization test (VNT) is a functional immunoassay which detects the presence and quantity of neutralizing antibodies. It is a highly sensitive and specific test. As with most neutralization assays, the EHDV VNT does not react with all virus-targeting antibodies, but specifically with those antibodies that bind to VP2, the outermost capsid structural protein of the virus. The interaction between VP2 and neutralizing antibodies can block EHDV cell binding, neutralizing its infectivity. The detection and quantification of neutralizing antibodies are indicative of how protected an animal is against reinfection. The EHD VNT can therefore be a useful tool to monitor the efficacy of a vaccination campaign. VP2 is also the main determinant of EHDV serotype specificity, and so EHDV-neutralizing antibodies which target VP2 are also serotype-specific. Throughdetecting and quantifying neutralizing antibodies, the VNT can discriminate the EHDV serotype responsible for an infection and provides insights into the time of infection. It is considered the gold standard test for identifying and quantifying antibodies against EHDV serotypes present in test serum samples. The assay is performed in vitro and is based on inhibition of virus infectivity in the presence of neutralizing antibodies. A neutralizing antibody titer is determined through the presence or absence of cytopathic effect in a cell monolayer. The VNT is a relatively inexpensive assay using standard laboratory equipment; however, to perform the assay, cell cultures, significant time, intensive labor, and technical skill are required.

A single-dose MCMV-based vaccine elicits long-lasting immune protection in mice against distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Current vaccines against COVID-19 elicit immune responses that are overall strong but wane rapidly. As a consequence, the necessary booster shots have contributed to vaccine fatigue. Hence, vaccines that would provide lasting protection against COVID-19 are needed, but are still unavailable. Cytomegaloviruses (CMVs) elicit lasting and uniquely strong immune responses. Used as vaccine vectors, they may be attractive tools that obviate the need for boosters. Therefore, we tested the murine CMV (MCMV) as a vaccine vector against COVID-19 in relevant preclinical models of immunization and challenge. We have previously developed a recombinant MCMV vaccine vector expressing the spike protein of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (MCMVS). In this study, we show that the MCMVS elicits a robust and lasting protection in young and aged mice. Notably, spike-specific humoral and cellular immunity was not only maintained but also even increased over a period of at least 6 months. During that time, antibody avidity continuously increased and expanded in breadth, resulting in neutralization of genetically distant variants, like Omicron BA.1. A single dose of MCMVS conferred rapid virus clearance upon challenge. Moreover, MCMVS vaccination controlled two variants of concern (VOCs), the Beta (B.1.135) and the Omicron (BA.1) variants. Thus, CMV vectors provide unique advantages over other vaccine technologies, eliciting broadly reactive and long-lasting immune responses against COVID-19.

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the HC009 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.

With the rapid global spread of COVID-19 and the continuous emergence of variants, there is an urgent need to develop safe and effective vaccines. Here, we developed a novel mRNA vaccine, HC009, based on new formulation by the QTsome delivery platform. Immunogenicity results showed that the prime-boost immunization strategy with HC009 was able to induce robust and durable humoral immunity, as well as Th1-biased cellular responses in rodents or non-human primates (NHPs). After further challenge with live SARS-CoV-2 virus, HC009 provided adequate protection against virus infection in hACE2 transgenic mice. Therefore, HC009 could provide significant immune protection against SARS-CoV-2.

Immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine in adults aged 60 to 75 years: A comparison of phase 2b and phase 3 clinical trial material.

The Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine has previously demonstrated efficacyin protecting older adults against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related lower respiratory tract disease in a phase 2b study. This study compared the immunogenicity of vaccine clinical trial material (CTM) representative of phase 2b clinical studies with CTM used in phase 3 clinical studies. A total of 248 adults aged 60-75 years, randomized in a 1:1 ratio, received one dose of either phase 3 CTM or phase 2b CTM. Solicited adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed for 7-d, 28-d, and 6-month periods post-vaccination, respectively. RSV preF-ELISA antibody titers and RSV neutralizing titers were measured before and 14 d after vaccination. The phase 3 CTM-induced preF-ELISA response at Day 15, in terms of geometric mean titer, was shown to be non-inferior to that induced by phase 2b CTM. The RSV neutralizing antibody titers were also similar in the two groups at Day 15. The safety profile in terms of solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs, or SAEs was in general similar between the phase 3 CTM and phase 2b CTM groups, and solicited AEs were mostly mild to moderate in intensity. No related SAEs were reported, and no safety concerns were identified.

4th booster-dose SARS-CoV-2 heterologous and homologous vaccination in rheumatological patients.

Objective: to evaluate the immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adults with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) in comparison to healthy individuals, observed 1-20 weeks following the fourth vaccine dose. Additionally, to evaluate the impact of immunosuppressive therapies, vaccination schedules, the time interval between vaccination and sample collection on the vaccine's immune response. Methods: We designed a longitudinal observational study conducted at the rheumatology department of Hospital de Copiapó. Neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) titers against the Wuhan and Omicron variant were analyzed between 1-20 weeks after administration of the fourth dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to 341 participants (218 IMRD patients and 123 healthy controls). 218 IMRD patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic vasculitis (VS) and systemic scleroderma (SS) were analyzed. Results: Performing a comparison between the variants, Wuhan vs Omicron, we noticed that there were significant differences (p<0.05) in the level of the ID50, both for healthy controls and for patients with IMRDs. The humoral response of patients with IMRDs is significantly lower compared to healthy controls for the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (p = 0.0015). The humoral response of patients with IMRDs decreases significantly when the time interval between vaccination and sample collection is greater than 35 days. This difference was observed in the response, both for the Wuhan variant and for the Omicron variant. Conclusion: The IMRDs patients, the humoral response variation in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine depends on doses and type of vaccine administered, the humoral response times and the treatment that these patients are receiving.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 total immunoglobulin and neutralising antibody responses in healthy blood donors throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Quantifying antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and neutralising antibodies may help to understand protection at the individual and population levels. Determination of neutralising antibodies using classical virus neutralisation tests (VNT) is considered the gold standard, but they are costly and time-intensive. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based surrogate VNTs (sVNT) or anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain immunoglobulins (anti-S-RBD Ig) may be suitable alternatives to VNTs. We aimed to (a) explore the correlations between anti-S-RBD Ig, VNT, and sVNT measurements and (b) describe humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination, natural infection, and vaccine breakthrough infection in healthy blood donors. METHODS: We measured total anti-SARS-CoV-2 Ig in 5714 serum samples from 2748 healthy individuals visiting the Swiss Red Cross Blood Donation Centre in Basel from 03/2020 to 04/2022. We used the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Roche) against the N- and S-receptor binding domain (RBD) proteins. In a subset of 548 samples from 123 donors, we conducted sVNTs against the Wuhan wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Detection Kit; Adipogen™). In 100 samples from 40 donors, we correlated sVNT and VNTs against the wild-type (D614G WU1) virus. Surveys were sent to the blood donors to collect data on their SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination status. Using this data, donors were categorised as "vaccination only", "infection before vaccination", "post-vaccine breakthrough infection", and "natural infection only". RESULTS: Our longitudinal observation study cohort consisted of 50.7% males with a median age of 31 years (range 18-75 y). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 N protein positivity rates per month indicate 57.1% (88/154) of the cohort was infected up to 04/2022. No differences in seropositivity were found between sexes, age groups, blood types (AB0 or RhD), and cytomegalovirus serostatus. We observed a high correlation between anti-S-RBD Ig and inhibition percentage (Spearman's ρ = 0.92, Kendall's τ = 0.77, p <0.0001). We determined the sensitivity and specificity for the manufacturers' thresholds for detecting virus-neutralising effects and computed the "best" cut-off based on our real-world data. We categorised 722/1138 (63.5%) donors as vaccination only (82.3%), post-vaccine breakthrough infection (7.8%), infection before vaccination (5.8%), and natural infection only (4.2%). We observed a lower inhibition percentage in the natural infection-only group than in all other vaccinated groups. The infection before vaccination group had higher anti-S-RBD Ig titres after the first vaccine dose than the other vaccinated groups. CONCLUSION: In total, 57.1% of healthy blood donors were infected with SARS-CoV-2, but natural infection without evidence of vaccination seems to result in substantially lower neutralising antibody levels. An estimate of antibody neutralisation may be helpful to assess reinfection risk. Total anti-S-RBD Ig correlates with surrogate virus neutralisation test results, a surrogate for neutralisation; therefore, we suggest that total anti-S-RBD Ig may estimate the level of neutralising antibodies. The threshold for protection from an unfavourable clinical outcome must be evaluated in prospective clinical cohorts.

Alterations of plasma metabolomes and their correlations with immunogenicity in maintenance hemodialysis patients receiving different COVID-19 vaccine regimens.

Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients exhibit compromised immune responses, leading to lower immunogenicity to the COVID-19 vaccine than the general population. The metabolomic factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine response in MHD patients remain elusive. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 MHD patients, divided into three vaccine regimen groups (N= 10 per group): homologous CoronaVac® (SV-SV), homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZ-AZ), and heterologous prime-boost (SV-AZ). Plasma samples were collected at baseline and at 28 days after the final dose to analyze 92 metabolomic levels using targeted metabolomics. The study included 30 MHD patients (mean age 56.67 ± 10.79 years) with similar neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels across vaccine regimens. The most significant differences in metabolomics were found between AZ-AZ and SV-SV, followed by SV-AZ versus SV-SV, and AZ-AZ versus SV-AZ. Overall, the metabolomic changes involved amino acids like glutamate and phenylalanine, and phospholipids. Prevaccination metabolomic profiles, including PG (38:1), lysoPE (20:2), lysoPC (18:2), lysoPI (18:1), and PC (34:2), exhibited negative correlations with postvaccination nAb levels. Different COVID-19 vaccine regimens had unique interactions with the immune response in MHD patients. Amino acid and phospholipid metabolisms play crucial roles in nAb formation, with the phospholipid metabolism being a potentially predictive marker of vaccine immunogenicity among MHD patients.

A nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine forming rabies virus-like particle elicits strong cellular and humoral immune responses against rabies virus infection in mice.

Rabies is a lethal zoonotic disease that threatens human health. As the only viral surface protein, the rabies virus (RABV) glycoprotein (G) induces main neutralizing antibody (Nab) responses; however, Nab titre is closely correlated with the conformation of G. Virus-like particles (VLP) formed by the co-expression of RABV G and matrix protein (M) improve retention and antigen presentation, inducing broad, durable immune responses. RABV nucleoprotein (N) can elicit humoral and cellular immune responses. Hence, we developed a series of nucleoside-modified RABV mRNA vaccines encoding wild-type G, soluble trimeric RABV G formed by an artificial trimer motif (tG-MTQ), membrane-anchored prefusion-stabilized G (preG). Furthermore, we also developed RABV VLP mRNA vaccine co-expressing preG and M to generate VLPs, and VLP/N mRNA vaccine co-expressing preG, M, and N. The RABV mRNA vaccines induced higher humoral and cellular responses than inactivated rabies vaccine, and completely protected mice against intracerebral challenge. Additionally, the IgG and Nab titres in RABV preG, VLP and VLP/N mRNA groups were significantly higher than those in G and tG-MTQ groups. A single administration of VLP or VLP/N mRNA vaccines elicited protective Nab responses, the Nab titres were significantly higher than that in inactivated rabies vaccine group at day 7. Moreover, RABV VLP and VLP/N mRNA vaccines showed superior capacities to elicit potent germinal centre, long-lived plasma cell and memory B cell responses, which linked to high titre and durable Nab responses. In summary, our data demonstrated that RABV VLP and VLP/N mRNA vaccines could be promising candidates against rabies.

Immune signature in vaccinated versus non-vaccinated aged people with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: A definition of the immunological features of COVID-19 pneumonia is needed to support clinical management of aged patients. In this study, we characterized the humoral and cellular immune responses in presence or absence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, in aged patients admitted to the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Italy) for COVID-19 pneumonia between November 2021 and March 2022. METHODS: The study was approved by local authorities. Disease severity was evaluated according to WHO guidelines. We tested: (A) anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response (anti-RBD-S IgG, anti-S IgM, anti-N IgG, neutralizing activity against Delta, BA1, BA4/5 variants); (B) Lymphocyte B, CD4 and CD8 T-cell phenotype; (C) plasma cytokines. The impact of vaccine administration and different variants on the immunological responses was evaluated using standard linear regression models and Tobit models for censored outcomes adjusted for age, vaccine doses and gender. RESULT: We studied 47 aged patients (median age 78.41), 22 (47%) female, 33 (70%) older than 70 years (elderly). At hospital admission, 36% were unvaccinated (VACno), whilst 63% had received 2 (VAC2) or 3 doses (VAC3) of vaccine. During hospitalization, WHO score > 5 was higher in unvaccinated (14% in VAC3 vs. 43% in VAC2 and 44% VACno). Independently from vaccination doses and gender, elderly had overall reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response (IgG-RBD-S, p = 0.0075). By linear regression, the anti-RBD-S (p = 0.0060), B (p = 0.0079), CD8 (p = 0.0043) and Th2 cell counts (p = 0.0131) were higher in VAC2 + 3 compared to VACno. Delta variant was the most representative in VAC2 (n = 13/18, 72%), detected in 41% of VACno, whereas undetected in VAC3, and anti-RBD-S production was higher in VAC2 vs. VACno (p = 0.0001), alongside neutralization against Delta (p = 0141), BA1 (p = 0.0255), BA4/5 (p = 0.0162). Infections with Delta also drove an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-α, p = 0.0463; IL-6, p = 0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 3 vaccination doses reduces the severe symptomatology in aged and elderly. Vaccination showed a strong association with anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response and an expansion of Th2 T-cells populations, independently of age. Delta variants and number of vaccine doses affected the magnitude of the humoral response against the original SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants. A systematic surveillance of the emerging variants is paramount to define future vaccination strategies.

Multi-omics landscapes reveal heterogeneity in long COVID patients characterized with enhanced neutrophil activity.

BACKGROUND: Omicron variant impacts populations with its rapid contagiousness, and part of patients suffered from persistent symptoms termed as long COVID. The molecular and immune mechanisms of this currently dominant global variant leading to long COVID remain unclear, due to long COVID heterogeneity across populations. METHODS: We recruited 66 participants in total, 22 out of 66 were healthy control without COVID-19 infection history, and 22 complaining about long COVID symptoms 6 months after first infection of Omicron, referred as long COVID (LC) Group. The left ones were defined as non-long COVID (NLC) Group. We profiled them via plasma neutralizing antibody titer, SARS-CoV-2 viral load, transcriptomic and proteomics screening, and machine learning. RESULTS: No serum residual SARS-CoV-2 was observed in the participants 6 months post COVID-19 infection. No significant difference in neutralizing antibody titers was found between the long COVID (LC) Group and the non-long COVID (NLC) Group. Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling allow the stratification of long COVID into neutrophil function upregulated (NU-LC) and downregulated types (ND-LC). The NU-LC, identifiable through a refined set of 5 blood gene markers (ABCA13, CEACAM6, CRISP3, CTSG and BPI), displays evidence of relatively higher neutrophil counts and function of degranulation than the ND-LC at 6 months after infection, while recovered at 12 months post COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The transcriptomic and proteomic profiling revealed heterogeneity among long COVID patients. We discovered a subgroup of long COVID population characterized by neutrophil activation, which might associate with the development of psychiatric symptoms and indicate a higher inflammatory state. Meanwhile, a cluster of 5 genes was manually curated as the most potent discriminators of NU-LC from long COVID population. This study can serve as a foundational exploration of the heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of long COVID and assist in therapeutic targeting and detailed epidemiological investigation of long COVID.

Validation of a triple-color pseudovirion-based neutralization assay for immunogenicity assessment of a 14-valent recombinant human papillomavirus vaccine.

Validation of bioanalytical methods is crucial, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, to determine their suitability for specific purposes and the accuracy of analytical results. The pseudovirion-based neutralization assay (PBNA) is considered the gold standard for detecting and quantifying neutralizing antibodies against human papillomavirus in vaccine development for disease prevention. This paper introduces an improved triple-color PBNA method, capable of simultaneous detection of two or three human papillomavirus (HPV types for use in the development of a 14-valent HPV vaccine candidate. The primary objective was to comprehensively validate the triple-color PBNA method for general vaccine immunogenicity assays. Results show that the method has good specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity, robustness, and applicability. This innovative triple-color PBNA offers an improved approach for large-scale immunogenicity assessment in vaccine development. This study lays a solid foundation that can serve as a guiding paradigm for assessing vaccine responses in preclinical and clinical phases, providing valuable insights to the field.

The Impact of SIV-Induced Immunodeficiency on SARS-CoV-2 Disease, Viral Dynamics, and Antiviral Immune Response in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Coinfection.

The effects of immunodeficiency associated with chronic HIV infection on COVID-19 disease and viral persistence have not been directly addressed in a controlled setting. In this pilot study, we exposed two pigtail macaques (PTMs) chronically infected with SIVmac239, exhibiting from very low to no CD4 T cells across all compartments, to SARS-CoV-2. We monitored the disease progression, viral replication, and evolution, and compared these outcomes with SIV-naïve PTMs infected with SARS-CoV-2. No overt signs of COVID-19 disease were observed in either animal, and the SARS-CoV-2 viral kinetics and evolution in the SIVmac239 PTMs were indistinguishable from those in the SIV-naïve PTMs in all sampled mucosal sites. However, the single-cell RNA sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage cells revealed an infiltration of functionally inert monocytes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Critically, neither of the SIV-infected PTMs mounted detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses nor anti-SARS-CoV-2 binding or neutralizing antibodies. Thus, HIV-induced immunodeficiency alone may not be sufficient to drive the emergence of novel viral variants but may remove the ability of infected individuals to mount adaptive immune responses against SARS-CoV-2.

Safety and DIVA Capability of Novel Live Attenuated Classical Swine Fever Marker Vaccine Candidates in Pregnant Sows.

Classical Swine Fever (CSF), a highly contagious viral disease affecting pigs and wild boar, results in significant economic losses in the swine industry. In endemic regions, prophylactic vaccination and stamping-out strategies are used to control CSF outbreaks. However, sporadic outbreaks and persistent infections continue to be reported. Although the conventional attenuated CSF vaccines protect pigs against the disease, they do not allow for the differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA), limiting their use as an eradication tool. In this study, three targeted attenuation strategies were employed to generate vaccine candidates based on the current prevalent CSFV group 2 strains GD18 and QZ07: a single deletion of H79 in Erns (QZ07-sdErnsH-KARD), double deletion of H79 and C171 in Erns (GD18-ddErnsHC-KARD and QZ07-ddErnsHC-KARD), and deletion of H79 in Erns combined with a 5-168 amino acids deletion of Npro (GD18-ddNpro-ErnsH-KARD). Additionally, a negative serological marker with four substitutions in a highly conserved epitope in E2 recognized by the monoclonal antibody 6B8 was introduced in each candidate for DIVA purposes. The safety of these four resulting vaccine candidates was evaluated in pregnant sows. Two candidates, GD18-ddErnsHC-KARD and QZ07-sdErnsH-KARD were found to be safe for pregnant sows and unlikely to cause vertical transmission. Both candidates also demonstrated potential to be used as DIVA vaccines, as was shown using a proprietary blocking ELISA based on the 6B8 monoclonal antibody. These results, together with our previous work, constitute a proof-of-concept for the rational design of CSF antigenically marked modified live virus vaccine candidates.

Enterovirus A71 2A-S125A acts as an attenuated vaccine candidate, indicating a universal approach in developing enterovirus vaccines.

Enteroviruses are important human pathogens with diverse serotypes, posing a major challenge to develop vaccines for individual serotypes, the success of polio vaccines in controlling and eradicating polio, along with the recent emergence and high prevalence of enterovirus-caused infectious diseases, highlights the importance of enterovirus vaccine development. Given our previous report on enteroviruses weakened by the 2 A S/T125A mutation, we assessed the potential of the EV-A71 2A-125A mutant as a vaccine candidate to address this challenge. We found that the 2A-125A mutant caused transient mild symptoms, low viral loads, and no significant pathological changes mild pathological changes in hSCARB2-KI mice, producing long-lasting cross-neutralizing antibodies against two EV-A71 wild strains. Pre-exposure to the 2A-125A mutant substantially protected against the EV-A71 Isehara wild-type strain, causing minor pathologies, significantly reducing muscle and lung inflammation, and preventing neurological damage, with reduced viral loads in vivo. Pre-exposure also distinctly suppressed the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, correlating to the severity of clinical symptoms. Collectively, the EV-A71 2A-125A mutant was attenuated and could generate a robust and protective immune response, suggesting its potential as a vaccine candidate and global solution for specific enterovirus vaccine development.