[Pharmacological effects of fonturacetam (Actitropil) and prospects for its clinical use]. / Farmakologicheskie effekty fonturatsetama (Aktitropil) i perspektivy ego klinicheskogo primeneniya.

Phenylpiracetam (PP) is a nootropic drug with additional pharmacological effects, including anxiolytic, antiasthenic, antidepressant, anti-inflammatory and anticonvulsant effects. The paper presents the results of an analysis of experimental and clinical studies, which indicate the prospects for the use of PP in cerebral ischemia, neurodegenerative pathologies, epilepsy, asthenia, and mental disorders. The adaptogenic properties and mitochondrial protective effect of PP are considered, assessments of the possible effect of PP on neurotransmitter systems, regulation of carbohydrate and fat metabolism with the prospects for the use of PP in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Resveratrol: A Multifaceted Guardian against Anxiety and Stress Disorders-An Overview of Experimental Evidence.

The medicinal properties of resveratrol have garnered increasing attention from researchers. Extensive data have been accumulated on its use in treating cardiovascular diseases, immune system disorders, cancer, neurological diseases, and behavioral disorders. The protective mechanisms of resveratrol, particularly in anxiety-related stress disorders, have been well documented. However, less attention has been given to the side effects of resveratrol. This review explores not only the mechanisms underlying the anxiolytic effects of resveratrol but also the mechanisms that may lead to increased anxiety following resveratrol treatment. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of resveratrol in managing anxiety disorders associated with stress and PTSD.

Psychotropic drug prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among people with depressive and anxiety disorders: a multinational network study.

BACKGROUND: People with mental health conditions were potentially more vulnerable than others to the neuropsychiatric effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the global efforts taken to contain it. The aim of this multinational study was to examine the changes in psychotropic drug prescribing during the pandemic among people with depressive and anxiety disorders. METHODS: This study included electronic medical records and claims data from nine databases in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, the UK, South Korea, and the USA) of patients with a diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorders between 2016 and 2021. The outcomes were monthly prevalence rates of antidepressant, antipsychotic, and anxiolytic drug prescribing. The associations between the pandemic and psychotropic drug prescribing were examined with interrupted time series analyses for the total sample and stratified by sex and age group. People with lived experience were not involved in the research and writing process. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2016 and Dec 31, 2020, an average of 16 567 914 patients with depressive disorders (10 820 956 females [65·31%] and 5 746 958 males [34·69%]) and 15 988 451 patients with anxiety disorders (10 688 788 females [66·85%] and 5 299 663 males [33·15%]) were identified annually. Most patients with depressive disorders and anxiety disorders were aged 45-64 years. Ethnicity data were not available. Two distinct trends in prescribing rates were identified. The first pattern shows an initial surge at the start of the pandemic (eg, antipsychotics among patients with depressive disorders in MDCD_US (rate ratio [RR] 1·077, 95% CI 1·055-1·100), followed by a gradual decline towards the counterfactual level (RR 0·990, 95% CI 0·988-0·992). The second pattern, observed in four databases for anxiolytics among patients with depressive disorders and two for antipsychotics among patients with anxiety disorders, shows an immediate increase (eg, antipsychotics among patients with anxiety disorders in IQVIA_UK: RR 1·467, 95% CI 1·282-1·675) without a subsequent change in slope (RR 0·985, 95% CI 0·969-1·003). In MDCD_US and IQVIA_US, the anxiolytic prescribing rate continued to increase among patients younger than 25 years for both disorders. INTERPRETATION: The study reveals persistently elevated rates of psychotropic drug prescriptions beyond the initial phase of the pandemic. These findings underscore the importance of enhanced mental health support and emphasise the need for regular review of psychotropic drug use among this patient group in the post-pandemic era. FUNDING: University Grants Committee, Research Grants Council, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Quality of life, pain and use of analgesic, anxiolytic and antidepressant medication, in people living in care homes.

BACKGROUND: People living in care homes often have problems with pain, anxiety and depression. Whether being on analgesia, anxiolytics or antidepressants has any bearing on pain severity and quality of life (QoL) in this population, requires further investigation. OBJECTIVES: (i) to examine the relationship between pain, anxiety and depression and medication use in care home residents and (ii) to compare those on medications to treat pain, anxiety and depression, and those who were not, and associations with pain severity and overall QoL. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial testing a falls prevention intervention in care homes. We recorded pain, anxiety and depression, QoL measurements and prescribed medication use. RESULTS: In 1589 participants, the mean age was 84.7 years (±9.3 SD), 32.2% were male and 67.3% had a diagnosis of dementia. 54.3% and 53.2% of participants had some level of pain and anxiety or depression respectively, regardless of prescribed medication use. There was a direct association between pain severity and being on any analgesia, opioid analgesia, and antidepressants, but no associations between pain severity and use of paracetamol and anxiolytics. QoL was best for residents with no pain and not on any analgesia, anxiolytics or antidepressants and worst for those with moderate-extreme pain and taking at least two of these classes of medications. CONCLUSION: Many care home residents live with pain, anxiety and depression. Addressing residents' pain may also increase their quality of life, but using medication alone to reach this goal may be inadequate.

Dispensing patterns of antidepressant and antianxiety medications for psychiatric disorders after benign hysterectomy in reproductive-age women: Results from group-based trajectory modeling.

BACKGROUND: Women with gynecologic disorders requiring a hysterectomy often have co-existing psychiatric diagnoses. A change in the dispensing pattern of antidepressant (AD) and antianxiety (AA) medications around the time of hysterectomy may be due to improvement in gynecologic symptoms, such as pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding, or the emotional impact of the hysterectomy. Unfortunately, these dispensing patterns before and after hysterectomy are currently undescribed. OBJECTIVES: To model the dispensing patterns of AD and AA medications over time among women with psychiatric disorders before and after benign hysterectomy for endometriosis and uterine fibroids; and to characterize clusters of patients with various dispensing behaviors based on these patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: This is a study of women who underwent a benign hysterectomy using data from the Merative MarkertScan® Research Databases (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Inclusion criteria were reproductive-aged women (18-50 years), diagnosis of at least one mood or anxiety disorder, and at least one dispensing of AD or AA medications. We measured monthly adherence and persistence of AD/AA medication use over 12 months after hysterectomy. Group-based-trajectory modeling (GBTM) was used to identify trajectory groups of monthly AD/AA medication dispensing over the study period. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with individual dispensing trajectory patterns. RESULTS: For a total of 11,607 patients, 6 dispensing trajectory groups were identified during the study period: continuously high (27.0%), continuously moderate (21.9%), continuously low (17.9%), low-to-high (10.0%), moderate-to-low (9.8%), and low-to-moderate (13.4%). Compared with the continuously high group, younger age, no history of a mood disorder, and uterine fibroids were clinical predictors of low dispensing. The discontinuation rate at 3 months after hysterectomy was higher at 88.6% in the continuously low group and at 66.5% in the continuously low-to-moderate group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that GBTM identified six distinct trajectories of AD/AA medication dispensing in the perioperative period. Trajectory models could be used to identify specific dispensing patterns for targeting interventions.

Dispensing patterns of antidepressant and antianxiety medications for psychiatric disorders after benign hysterectomy in reproductive-aged women: Results from the group-based trajectory modelingWomen with gynecologic disorders often have coexisting psychiatric diagnoses. A change in the dispensing pattern of antidepressant and antianxiety medications may be due to improvement in gynecologic symptoms or the emotional impact of the hysterectomy. However, static measures, such as the proportion of days covered or medication possession ratio, may not adequately predict meaningful dispensing patterns. Using the group-based trajectory modeling, 6 distinct patterns of medication dispensing over the perioperative periods of women with benign hysterectomy are identified and therefore used to assess how certain clinical characteristics influence these dispensing patterns. This study concludes that trajectory modeling may be a more appropriate approach to investigating dispensing patterns among women with preexisting psychiatric conditions.

[To study the effectiveness and impact on the quality of life of patients with subclinical and clinically pronounced anxiety disorder of a mobile application in combination with Adaptol therapy]. / Izuchenie effektivnosti i vliyaniya na kachestvo zhizni patsientov s subklinicheskim i klinicheski vyrazhennym trevozhnym rasstroistvom mobil'nogo prilozheniya v sochetanii s terapiei preparatom Adaptol.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and the quality of life impact of the mobile application Zdorovye.ru in people with subclinical and clinical anxiety disorder (AD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 200 patients with more than 7 points on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were included. Participants were randomized into two groups: experimental one (EG, n=133) - to receive standard treatment with temgicoluril (Adaptol), 500 mg (Olainfarm JSC, Latvia) and the Zdorovye.ru application; control group (CG, n=52) - standard treatment with temgicoluril (Adaptol). RESULTS: There were a significant decrease in the HADS-A score, PSS-10 score and an increase in the visual analog scale EQ-5D score in both groups after 3 months of treatment (p<0.001). Clinical improvement was noticeable after 1.5 months in EG group: a decrease in HADS-A scores (p=0.001) and in tension and stress on PSS-10 subscales (p<0.001) were noted. This effect was not observed in the CG. After 3 months, all participants noted an improvement in quality of life (p<0.001), without a statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.233). The application left a positive impression on users and doctors - most respondents rated it as useful and clear. CONCLUSION: Taking temgicoluril (Adaptol) for 3 months led to symptoms decrease and the quality of life and well-being improvement in patients with AD. Using the mobile application Zdorovye.ru in conjunction with drug therapy made it possible to achieve a clinical effect earlier, in 1.5 months.

[Efficacy and safety of Aviandr in the treatment of anxiety in patients with adjustment disorders after COVID-19]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' novogo preparata Aviandr v lechenii trevogi u patsientov s rasstroistvom adaptatsii posle perenesennoi ostroi koronovirusnoi infektsii.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Aviandr in the treatment of anxiety in patients with adjustment disorders after COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter prospective open-label study included 109 patients of both sexes aged 18 to 65 years (70 women, 39 men, average age - 41.4±13.18 years) with a leading complaint of anxiety (Hamilton scale score, HAM-A ≥18 - ≤24), which arose after acute coronavirus infections. Clinical manifestations had to meet the diagnostic criteria F43.2 ICD-10. The drug Aviander was prescribed 20 mg 2 times a day for 4 weeks. At the end of taking the drug, patients were monitored for another 1 week (a delayed follow-up visit). Psychopathological, statistical and parametric research methods were used using standardized HAM-A, Montgomery-Asberg scales (MADRS), visual analog asthenia scale (VASH-A), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), digital character substitution test (DSST), general clinical impression scale (CGI). RESULTS: Data from 109\110 patients were analyzed to evaluate efficacy\safety. Aviandr was administered 20 mg 2 times daily for 4 weeks. Patients were followed for 1 week (delayed follow-up visit) at the end of treatment. Reducing the intensity of anxiety on the HAM-A scale was - 14.2±4.92 or 69.4±22.66% by the end of treatment. The response rate to therapy (responders are patients with a decrease in the total score on the HAM-A ≥50%) was 83.49%. Remission was achieved (sum of HAM-A scores ≤7) by the end of treatment 68.81% of patients, and 79.8% of patients at the follow-up visit. Significant changes were obtained on the MADRS, VAS-A, SDS and DSST scales. According CGI 45.9% of patients had «much improved¼ and 43.1% of patients had «very much improved¼ by the end of treatment; 58.7% of patients had «much improved¼ and of 33.9% patients had «very much improved¼ at the follow-up visit. 38 adverse events were reported in 27 (24.55%) patients during the study. A definite association with study drug was reported between 5 mild adverse events in 4 (3.64%) patients. No subjects withdrew from the study due to an adverse event. Positive dynamics (reduction of anxiety symptoms, decrease in asthenia) persisted after discontinuation of the study drug. No cases of withdrawal syndrome were observed. CONCLUSION: According to the results of the study, the anxiolytic, antidepressant, antiasthenic and pro-cognitive effects of Aviandr were observed. An increase in the social activity of patients was observed.

The effects of remimazolam in combination with estazolam on postoperative hemodynamics and pain intensity in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining remimazolam with estazolam on hemodynamics and pain levels after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 184 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. The patients were divided into four groups: Study Group 1(Remimazolam), Study Group 2(Estazolam), Study Group 3(Remimazolam + Estazolam), and Control Group. Anesthesia induction included intravenous injection of remimazolam and estazolam in the study groups, while the control group received normal saline. Hemodynamic parameters, stress responses, anxiety levels, and pain intensity were assessed at various time points. RESULTS: The results showed that the combination of remimazolam and estazolam significantly improved hemodynamic parameters compared to the control group. Study Group 3 exhibited the lowest anxiety levels and stress responses among all groups. Furthermore, Study Group 3 had the lowest pain intensity scores at different postoperative time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of remimazolam and estazolam effectively stabilized hemodynamics, reduced anxiety levels, and alleviated pain intensity after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. These findings suggest that this combination therapy has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient comfort.

L-Cysteine: A promising nutritional supplement for alleviating anxiety disorders.

Anxiety disorders are prevalent chronic psychological disease with complex pathogenic mechanisms. Current anxiolytics have limited efficacy and numerous side effects in many anxiety patients, highlighting the urgent need for new therapies. Recent research has been focusing on nutritional supplements, particularly amino acids, as potential therapies for anxiety disorders. Among these, L-Cysteine plays a crucial role in various biological processes. L-Cysteine exhibits antioxidant properties that can enhance the antioxidant functions of the central nervous system (CNS). Furthermore, metabolites of L-cysteine, such as glutathione and hydrogen sulfide have been shown to alleviate anxiety through distinct molecular mechanisms. Long-term administration of L-Cysteine has anxiolytic, antidepressant, and memory-improving effects. L-Cysteine depletion can lead to increased oxidative stress in the brain. This review delves into the potential mechanisms of L-Cysteine and its main products, glutathione (GSH) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the management of anxiety and related diseases.

[A Case of Lung Cancer during Home Care with Suspected Chemical Coping].

An 81-year-old woman was prescribed hydromorphone for cancer pain and dyspnea. Owing to anxiety regarding worsening of symptoms, she began to use hydromorphone(10 to 12 times a day)even without symptoms. As chemical coping with opioid analgesics was suspected, the visiting nurse listened to the patient's perspective, and the patient was subsequently prescribed an anxiolytic(lorazepam)for insomnia and anxiety. Thereafter, the frequency of using hydromorphone hydrochloride tablets decreased.

Intranasal midazolam for procedural distress in children in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Intranasal (IN) midazolam is the most common anxiolytic for children in the emergency department (ED), but evidence of benefit is conflicting. We synthesized the evidence on IN midazolam for procedural distress in children undergoing ED painful procedures. METHODS: We included trials involving painful ED procedures in children 0-18 years involving IN midazolam. Primary outcome was procedural distress. We summarized results using Tricco et al.'s classification of "neutral" (p ≥ 0.05), "favorable," and "unfavorable" (p < 0.05), supporting IN midazolam or comparator, respectively, or "indeterminate" (unable to judge). Where possible, we pooled results using meta-analysis. Methodologic quality of evidence was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and GRADE system. RESULTS: We included 41 trials (n = 2973 participants). Thirty trials involved intravenous insertion. IN midazolam was superior to placebo (RR = 7.2; 95% CI: 3.43, 15.25; 3 trials; I2 = 0%). However, 56-90% of the IN midazolam group resisted the procedure. Focusing on the three trials that used validated measures, IN midazolam was "neutral" versus IN ketamine and either "neutral" or "unfavorable" versus IN dexmedetomidine. There was no difference in the proportion of children with a satisfactory distress score between IN midazolam and oral midazolam (RR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.73; 2 trials; I2 = 53%), IN ketamine (RR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.25; 6 trials; I2 = 0%), or IN dexmedetomidine (RR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.17, 1.05; 3 trials; I2 = 84%). Ten trials involved laceration repair. IN midazolam was "favorable" versus placebo; however, both groups scored in the anxious range. There was no difference in distress between IN midazolam and oral midazolam (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI:-0.32, 0.34; 2 trials; I2 = 0%) (Fig. 3E) [64,65]. Using validated instruments, IN midazolam was "unfavorable" versus IN dexmedetomidine but "favorable" versus oral diazepam and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited methodologically rigorous evidence that IN midazolam is better than placebo for IV insertion and laceration repair. At the doses studied, preliminary evidence suggests that IN dexmedetomidine may be superior to IN midazolam for both IV insertion and laceration repair.

ABSTRAIT: OBJECTIFS: Le midazolam intranasal (IN) est l'anxiolytique le plus courant chez les enfants du service des urgences (DE), mais les preuves des avantages sont contradictoires. Nous avons synthétisé les preuves sur l'IN midazolam pour la détresse procédurale chez les enfants subissant des procédures douloureuses d'urgence. MéTHODES: Nous avons inclus des essais impliquant des procédures douloureuses d'urgence chez les enfants de 0 à 18 ans impliquant IN midazolam. Le résultat principal était la détresse procédurale. Nous avons résumé les résultats en utilisant la classification de Tricco et coll. de « neutre ¼ (p 0,05), « favorable ¼, « défavorable ¼ (p < 0,05), à l'appui du midazolam IN ou du comparateur, respectivement, ou « indéterminé ¼ (incapable de juger). Dans la mesure du possible, nous avons regroupé les résultats en utilisant la méta-analyse. La qualité méthodologique des preuves a été évaluée à l'aide de l'outil de risque de biais de Cochrane Collaboration et du système GRADE. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 41 essais (n = 2973 participants). Trente essais portaient sur l'insertion intraveineuse. L'IN midazolam était supérieur au placebo (RR = 7,2; IC à 95 % : 3,43,15,25; 3 essais; I2 = 0 %). Cependant, 56 à 90 % du groupe IN midazolam a résisté à la procédure. En se concentrant sur les trois essais qui ont utilisé des mesures validées, IN midazolam était « neutre ¼ par rapport à IN kétamine et « neutre ¼ ou « défavorable ¼ par rapport à IN dexmedetomidine. Il n'y avait pas de différence dans la proportion d'enfants ayant un score de détresse satisfaisant entre IN midazolam et midazolam oral (RR = 1,1; IC à 95 % : 0,74,1,73; 2 essais; I2 = 53 %), IN kétamine (RR = 1,1; IC à 95 % : 0,91,1,25; 6 essais; I2 = 0 %) ou IN dexmedetomidine (RR = 0,4; IC à 95 % : 0,17,1,05; 3 essais; I2 = 84 %). Dix essais portaient sur la réparation de la lacération. L'IN midazolam était « favorable ¼ par rapport au placebo, mais les deux groupes ont obtenu des résultats dans la fourchette de l'anxiété. Il n'y avait pas de différence de détresse entre le midazolam IN et le midazolam oral (SMD = 0,01; IC à 95 %:-0,32,0,34; 2 essais; I2 = 0 %) (figure 3E)64,65. À l'aide d'instruments validés, l'IN midazolam était « défavorable ¼ par rapport à l'IN dexmedetomidine, mais « favorable ¼ par rapport au diazépam oral et au placebo. CONCLUSION: Il y a peu de preuves méthodologiques rigoureuses que l'IN midazolam est meilleur que le placebo pour l'insertion IV et la réparation de lacération. Aux doses étudiées, des preuves préliminaires suggèrent que l'IN dexmedetomidine peut être supérieure à l'IN midazolam pour l'insertion IV et la réparation de lacération.

The relationship between blinding integrity and medication efficacy in randomised-controlled trials in patients with anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blinding is thought to minimise expectancy effects and biases in double-blind randomised-controlled trials (RCTs). However, whether blinding integrity should be assessed and reported remains debated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether blinding failure influences the outcome of RCTs in anxiety disorders. We carried out a systematic review to understand whether blinding integrity is assessed and reported in anxiolytic RCTs. A secondary aim was to explore whether blinding integrity is associated with treatment efficacy. METHOD: Our protocol was pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42022328750). We searched electronic databases for placebo-controlled, randomised trials of medication in adults with generalised and social anxiety disorders, and in panic disorder, from 1980. We extracted data regarding blinding integrity and treatment efficacy. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Where possible, we subsequently calculated Bang's Blinding Index, and assessed the association between blinding integrity and treatment effect size. RESULTS: Of the 247 RCTs that met inclusion criteria, we were able to obtain assessments of blinding integrity from nine (3.64%). Overall, blinding failed in five of these trials (55.56%), but blinding was intact in 80% of placebo arms. We found a significant association between reduced blinding integrity among assessors and increased treatment effect size (betas < -1.30, p's < 0.001), but this analysis involved only four studies of which two were outlying studies. In patients, we saw a non-significant trend where reduced blinding integrity in the placebo groups was associated with increased treatment efficacy, which was not present in active medication arms. [Correction added on 19 August 2024, after first online publication: Results of the RCTs and its assessment of blinding integrity have been updated.] CONCLUSION: Consistent with work in other psychiatric disorders, blinding integrity is rarely reported in anxiolytic RCTs. Where it is reported, blinding appears to often fail. We found signals that suggest unblinding of clinician assessors (driven by two studies with complete unblinding), and of patients in placebo arms, might be associated with larger treatment effect sizes. We recommend that data regarding blinding integrity, along with the reasons patients and assessors offer for their beliefs regarding group allocation, are systematically collected in RCTs of anxiolytic treatment.

Challenging behaviour, the application of restrictive measures and psychotropic drug prescription in people with intellectual disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing of psychotropic drugs (PDs) and applying restrictive measures are both frequently used in managing challenging behaviour of people with intellectual disabilities (ID), which is not always according to guidelines or good clinical practice. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the potential triangular relationship between challenging behaviour, the application of restrictive measures and PD prescription. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In this cross-sectional study, data on challenging behaviour, PD prescription and restrictive measures were collected. We defined and compared four mutually exclusive groups of participants. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Challenging behaviour in the group in whom one or more PD were prescribed as a restrictive measures (PDRM) was more severe than in the other three groups. More severe challenging behaviour, a higher number of antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics prescriptions, a lower dosage, and more application of domotics as restrictive measure was shown in the PDRM compared to the group in whom PDs were prescribed according to guidelines (PDNRM). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We did not find indications for a triangular relationship of challenging behaviour, the application of restrictive measures and PD prescriptions. Future longitudinal research is needed to better understand this complex relationship and should investigate the indication and the effect of treatment. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?: This study is a first exploration of the potential triangular relationship between symptoms of challenging behaviour, psychotropic drug (PD) prescription, and the application of restrictive measures. Prescribing PDs and applying restrictive measures are two interventions which are commonly used to manage challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities. Both have been subject of research separately in recent years. However, it is conceivable that the PD prescription in treatments for challenging behaviour could be a substitute for another form of a restrictive measure, for example a physical or mechanical restraint. For this purpose, we defined and compared four mutually exclusive groups of participants. We found no indication for this triangular relationship. On the other hand, we found the highest severity of challenging behaviour in the group who used PDs as restrictive measure next to other restrictive measures. Our results may suggest that both prescribing PDs and applying non-pharmacological restrictive measures are used simultaneously in managing challenging behaviour, are not sufficiently implemented or effective.

The Identification of Potential Anti-Depression/Anxiety Drug Targets by Stress-Induced Rat Brain Regional Proteome and Network Analyses.

Depression and anxiety disorders are prevalent stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders and involve multiple molecular changes and dysfunctions across various brain regions. However, the specific and shared pathophysiological mechanisms occurring in these regions remain unclear. Previous research used a rat model of chronic mild stress (CMS) to segregate and identify depression-susceptible, anxiety-susceptible, and insusceptible groups; then the proteomes of six distinct brain regions (the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, pituitary, olfactory bulb, and striatum) were separately and quantitatively analyzed. To gain a comprehensive and systematic understanding of the molecular abnormalities, this study aimed to investigate and compare differential proteomics data from the six regions. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified in between specific regions and across all regions and subjected to a series of bioinformatics analyses. Regional comparisons showed that stress-induced proteomic changes and corresponding gene ontology and pathway enrichments were largely distinct, attributable to differences in cell populations, protein compositions, and brain functions of these areas. Additionally, a notable degree of overlap in the significantly enriched terms was identified, potentially suggesting strong connections in the enrichment across different regions. Furthermore, intra-regional and inter-regional protein-protein interaction networks and drug-target-DEP networks were constructed. Integrated analysis of the three association networks in the six regions, along with the DisGeNET database, identified ten DEPs as potential targets for anti-depression/anxiety drugs. Collectively, these findings revealed commonalities and differences across different brain regions at the protein level induced by CMS, and identified several novel protein targets for the development of new therapeutics for depression and anxiety.

Temporal trends in medication and service use patterns for mental health issues among men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer can significantly impact mental wellbeing, creating uncertainty and morbidity. This study described patterns of psychotropic medication and mental health service use, as a proxy measure for mental health problems, 5 years before and 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Population-based registry data were linked with Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare Benefits Schedule data for all prostate cancer patients diagnosed in South Australia between 2012 and 2020 (n = 13,693). We estimated the proportion and rates of psychotropic medication and mental health service use before and after diagnosis. Multivariable adjusted interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) were conducted to uncover temporal patterns. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of men commenced psychotropic medications and 6.4% sought out mental health services for the first time after diagnosis. Psychotropic medication use rose from 34.5% 5 years before to 40.3% 5 years after diagnosis, including an increase in use of antidepressants (from 20.7% to 26.0%) and anxiolytics (from 11.3% to 12.8%). Mental health service use increased from 10.2% to 12.1%, with the increase mostly being general practice mental health visits (from 7.8% to 10.6%). Multivariable ITSA indicated a significant rise in medication and service utilisation immediately before and in the first 2 years following prostate cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: There is a clear increase in psychotropic medication use and mental health service use around the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Mental health outcomes of men with prostate cancer may be improved with early mental health screening, particularly during the diagnosis process, to enable early intervention.

Linalool: Therapeutic Indication And Their Multifaceted Biomedical Applications.

This comprehensive review endeavors to illuminate the nuanced facets of linalool, a prominent monoterpene found abundantly in essential oils, constituting a massive portion of their composition. The biomedical relevance of linalool is a key focus, highlighting its therapeutic attributes observed through anti-nociceptive effects, anxiolytic properties, and behavioral modulation in individuals affected by dementia. These findings underscore the compound's potential application in biomedical applications. This review further explores contemporary formulations, delineating the adaptability of linalool in nano-emulsions, microemulsions, bio-capsules, and various topical formulations, including topical gels and lotions. This review covers published and granted patents between 2018-2024 and sheds light on the evolving landscape of linalool applications, revealing advancements in dermatological, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial domains.

Cannabidiol in anxiety disorders: Current and future perspectives.

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent psychiatric disorders, characterized by a chronic course and often accompanied by comorbid symptoms that impair functionality and decrease quality of life. Despite advances in basic and clinical research in our understanding of these disorders, currently available pharmacological options are associated with limited clinical benefits and side effects that frequently lead to treatment discontinuation. Importantly, a significant number of patients do not achieve remission and live with lifelong residual symptoms that limit daily functioning. Since the 1970s, basic and clinical research on cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychotomimetic compound found in the Cannabis sativa plant, has indicated relevant anxiolytic effects, garnering attention for its therapeutic potential as an option in anxiety disorder treatment. This chapter aims to review the history of these studies on the anxiolytic effects of CBD within the current understanding of anxiety disorders. It highlights the most compelling current evidence supporting its anxiolytic effects and explores future perspectives for its clinical use in anxiety disorders.

Driving performance of long-term users of sedating antidepressants and benzodiazepines.

OBJECTIVE: Using benzodiazepines and certain antidepressants is associated with an increased risk of motor vehicle crashes due to impaired driving skills. Hence, several countries prohibit people who use these drugs from driving. Traffic regulations for driving under the influence of these drugs are, however, largely based on single-dose studies with healthy participants. The effects of drugs on chronic users may be different because of potential development of tolerance or by adapting behavior. In this study, we test the effects of anti-depressants, hypnotics, or anxiolytics use on driving performance in patients who use these drugs for different durations and compare the effects to healthy controls' performance. METHODS: Sixty-six healthy controls and 82 medication users were recruited to perform four drives in a driving simulator. Patients were divided into groups that used anti-depressants, hypnotics, or anxiolytics, for shorter or longer than 3 years (i.e. LT3- or LT3+, respectively). The minimum term of use was 6 months. Driving behavior was measured in terms of longitudinal and lateral control (speed variability and Standard Deviation of Lateral Position: SDLP), brake reaction time, and time headway. Impaired driving performance was defined as performing similar to driving with a Blood Alcohol Concentration of 0.5‰ or higher, determined by means of non-inferiority analyses. RESULTS: Reaction time analyses revealed inconclusive findings in all groups. No significant performance differences between matched healthy controls, LT3- (n = 2), and LT3+ (n = 8) anxiolytics users were found. LT3+ antidepressants users (n = 12) did not perform inferior to their matched controls in terms of SDLP. LT3- hypnotics users (n = 6) showed more speed variability than their matched healthy controls, while this effect was not found for the LT3+ group (n = 14): the latter did not perform inferior to the healthy controls. Regarding Time Headway, no conclusions about the LT3- hypnotics group could be drawn, while the LT3+ group did not perform inferior compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of anxiolytics users prohibits drawing conclusions about clinical relevance. Although many outcomes were inconclusive, there is evidence that some elements of complex driving performance may not be impaired (anymore) after using antidepressants or hypnotics longer than 3 years.

[Recognan (citicoline) in the correction of asthenic and anxiety-depressive disorders]. / Rekognan (tsitikolin) v korrektsii astenicheskikh i trevozhno-depressivnykh narushenii.

The article reflects the results of a number of studies that demonstrate the therapeutic effectiveness of Recognan (citicoline) in anxiety-depressive and asthenic disorders against the background of somatic and neurological diseases, in the correction of post-stroke depression. Recent experimental animal studies prove the effect of citicoline on anxiety and depression. In the complex effect, Recognan potentiates the main pharmacological effect of antidepressants and anxiolytics. In some studies, a dose-dependent change in animal behavior has been observed in response to the analgesic and antidepressant effects of citicoline. The effectiveness of citicoline in combination with transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of depression has been shown. The analysis of these research materials allows us to recommend Recognan in the complex therapy of asthenic and anxiety-depressive disorders in response to such pathological conditions as anxiety, asthenia, depression.