Anatomical Study of the Innervation of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex and Distal Radioulnar and Radiocarpal Joints: Implications for Denervation.

PURPOSE: Open and percutaneous denervation is an emerging technique for joint pain. This study investigated the course and distribution of the articular branches innervating the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and radiocarpal joint (RCJ) relative to bony and soft tissue landmarks to guide wrist denervation procedures. METHODS: Fourteen formalin-embalmed specimens were serially dissected to expose the origin, course, and distribution of articular branches innervating the TFCC, DRUJ, and RCJ. Bony and soft tissue landmarks to localize each articular branch were documented and visualized on a 3-dimensional reconstruction of the bones of the distal forearm and hand. RESULTS: The TFCC was innervated by articular branches from the posterior interosseus nerve (10 of 14 specimens), dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (14 of 14 specimens), palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (12 of 14 specimens), and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (9 of 14 specimens). The DRUJ was innervated by the posterior interosseus nerve (9 of 14 specimens) and anterior interosseus nerve (14 of 14 specimens). The RCJ was innervated by the posterior interosseus nerve (14 of 14 specimens), superficial branch of the radial nerve (5 of 14 specimens), lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (14 of 14 specimens), and palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (10 of 14 specimens). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple nerves were found to innervate the TFCC, DRUJ, and RCJ. The relationship of anatomical landmarks to specific articular branches supplying the TFCC, DRUJ, and RCJ can inform selective denervation procedures based on the structural origin of pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The detailed documentation of the spatial relationship of the nerve supply to the wrist provides clinicians with the anatomical basis to optimize current, and develop new denervation protocols to manage chronic wrist pain.

Denervation of the Joints of the Hand and Wrist: Surgical Techniques and a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Joint denervation of the wrist, basal joint of the thumb, and the finger is an option for patients with chronic pain. Compared with other surgical treatment options, function is preserved and the rehabilitation time is limited. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for each joint to determine whether the choice of technique and choice of denervation of specific articular sensory branches lead to a different outcome. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed publisher, Cochrane, and Google Scholar database searches yielded 17 studies with reported outcome on denervation of the wrist, eight on the basal joint of the thumb, and five on finger joints. RESULTS: Overall, the level of evidence was low; only two studies included a control group, and none was randomized. Meta-analysis for pain showed a 3.3 decrease in visual analogue scale score for wrist pain. No difference was found between techniques (total versus partial denervation), nor did different approaches influence outcome. The first carpometacarpal joint showed a decrease for visual analogue scale score for pain of 5.4. Patient satisfaction with the treatment result was 83 percent and 82 percent, respectively. Reported pain in finger joints decreased 96 percent in the metacarpophalangeal joints, 81 percent in the proximal interphalangeal joint, and 100 percent in the distal interphalangeal joint. The only reported case in the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb reported an increase of 37 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Only denervation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb reported an increase in pain; however, this was a single patient. Wrist and first carpometacarpal joint and finger joint denervation have a high satisfaction rate and decrease the pain. There was no difference between techniques.

Influence of the visuo-proprioceptive illusion of movement and motor imagery of the wrist on EEG cortical excitability among healthy participants.

INTRODUCTION: Motor Imagery (MI) is a powerful tool to stimulate sensorimotor brain areas and is currently used in motor rehabilitation after a stroke. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether an illusion of movement induced by visuo-proprioceptive immersion (VPI) including tendon vibration (TV) and Virtual moving hand (VR) combined with MI tasks could be more efficient than VPI alone or MI alone on cortical excitability assessed using Electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS: We recorded EEG signals in 20 healthy participants in 3 different conditions: MI tasks involving their non-dominant wrist (MI condition); VPI condition; and VPI with MI tasks (combined condition). Each condition lasted 3 minutes, and was repeated 3 times in randomized order. Our main judgment criterion was the Event-Related De-synchronization (ERD) threshold in sensori-motor areas in each condition in the brain motor area. RESULTS: The combined condition induced a greater change in the ERD percentage than the MI condition alone, but no significant difference was found between the combined and the VPI condition (p = 0.07) and between the VPI and MI condition (p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the interest of using a visuo-proprioceptive immersion with MI rather than MI alone in order to increase excitability in motor areas of the brain. Further studies could test this hypothesis among patients with stroke to provide new perspectives for motor rehabilitation in this population.

Innervation of the wrist joint: Literature review and clinical implications.

The aim of this study was to review the literature on the innervation of the wrist with an emphasis on pathological and therapeutic aspects. The nerves involved in wrist innervation and their mechanoreceptor endings are described. The literature over the past 30 years includes several topics that are still subjects of discussion and debate and require further research.

Is partial wrist denervation beneficial in chronic wrist pain? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic wrist pain and subsequent functional decline is increasing. Diagnosis is challenging, with non-surgical treatment frequently failing. Recently, partial wrist denervation (PWD) has gained popularity as a procedure to alleviate chronic pain. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in April 2019. Inclusion criteria involved clinical studies with a minimum of ten wrists, focusing on PROMs, objective measures of function and complications. Papers investigating complete or mixed denervation procedures were excluded. RESULTS: Nine studies were included (292 wrists), all of which were observational in study design and limited in patient numbers, evaluation techniques and follow-up length. PWD appears to be associated with a reduction in pain, and functional improvement. Further surgery was required in 54 (24%) wrists at an average follow-up of 18 months. PWD was not found to complicate further surgery. CONCLUSION: PWD is associated with improvement in short-term pain relief and functional status, yet carries a high re-operation rate without contraindicating further salvage surgery. Further research is required to evaluate the benefits, duration of relief and long-term complications of PWD.

Partial wrist denervation versus total wrist denervation: A systematic review of the literature.

The aim of this systematic review was to understand which procedure-total or partial wrist denervation-provides better results in terms of pain relief and function. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018088856). We searched the Medline (PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases. Twenty-one studies were included in this review. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Coleman Methodological Score. Data on demographics, surgical indications, diagnostic methods, follow-up periods, type and rates of complications, survivorship of the procedure, return to work, and outcome measures were recorded. A total of 1065 patients were included in this review; the mean quality of the studies included was considered poor. The outcomes could not be analyzed because none of the studies had reliable outcome data reported, but both procedures were effective in terms of pain relief and range of motion. Partial wrist denervation has an average subsequent procedure rate of 19%. Total wrist denervation had an average subsequent procedure rate of 4.7%. No complications were reported in any patient who underwent partial wrist denervation versus 20 patients who underwent total wrist denervation. Both partial and total wrist denervation are safe and reliable procedures that can provide good pain relief and preserve wrist range of motion. Total wrist denervation offers better long-term outcomes in term of pain relief, with fewer subsequent procedures being needed compared to partial denervation, and with a low complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Systematic review, Therapeutic.

Evaluation of proprioception in denervated and healthy wrist joints.

We recruited 25 patients after complete wrist denervation and 60 healthy adults to investigate conscious and unconscious proprioception of the wrist. Ipsi- and contralateral joint-position sense, force sense, and wrist reflexes were measured. The latter were triggered by a trapdoor, recording electromyographic signals from the extensor carpi radialis brevis, extensor carpi ulnaris, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles. No significant differences were found for joint position sense, force sense, and wrist reflexes between both groups, except for reflex time of the flexor carpi ulnaris after denervation of the left wrist as compared with the left flexor carpi ulnaris in controls or in right operated wrists. At a mean follow-up of 32 months (range 8 to 133), we found no proprioceptive deficit of the conscious proprioceptive qualities of joint position sense, force sense, and the unconscious proprioceptive neuromuscular control of wrist reflex time for most muscles after complete wrist denervation. We conclude from this study that complete wrist denervation does not affect the proprioceptive senses of joint position, force sense, and reflex time of the wrist.

Safe zones in volar portals for wrist arthroscopy, evaluation of central portal : a cadaveric study.

The purpose of this cadaveric study is to determine safe zones utilizing volar portals for wrist arthroscopy, by quantitatively describing the neurovascular relationships of a volar radial and a volar ulnar wrist arthroscopy portals in comparison with those of a newly described volar central portal (7) , considering the advantages in visualization of volar portals for wrist arthroscopy over the standard dorsal (19) . The neurovascular structures and the tendons of nine frozen human cadaveric upper limbs were exposed, while the aforementioned volar portal sites were pointed out with pins. The horizontal distance between the portals and the closest neurovascular branch or tendon was measured with a digital caliper, followed by statistical analysis of the data. The median interquartile range distances from portals to structures at risk were measured and safe zones around each portal were established. This study provides a safe approach to the volar radial and ulnar aspects of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints, while volar radial and ulnar portals should be considered for inclusion in the arthroscopic examination of any patient with radial and ulnar sided wrist pain respectively (17,18) . Regarding the volar central portal, it is reproducible, safe and both the above joints can be inspected through one single incision (7) .

Total wrist denervation: Retrospective study of 39 wrists with 56 months' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyze patient satisfaction after total wrist denervation. HYPOTHESIS: Total wrist denervation provides reliable and durable results. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A single-center multi-surgeon retrospective study included a cohort of 39 wrists. Mean age was 58 years. The dominant side was operated on in two-thirds of cases. SLAC wrist and SNAC wrist accounted for 41% of etiologies. All patients were seen again in consultation and were evaluated for pain, strength, mobility and limb function. Failure was defined as any reoperation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 56 months, with no loss to follow-up. Pain improved in 79.5% of cases. Median DASH score was 27.27. Strength on Jamar® dynamometer improved from 60% to 75% compared to the contralateral side (p=0.012). Range of motion improved by 5° (p=0.052). At last follow-up, 31% of patients showed aggravation of radiological osteoarthritis. There were 4 revision procedures (total wrist fusion), and 4 complications. DISCUSSION: The present results were comparable to those in the literature in terms of satisfaction, functional scores and number of complications and revision procedures. Total wrist denervation is a reliable and reproducible surgical technique in terms of pain relief preservation of function in painful osteoarthritic wrists. It thus has an essential place in the therapeutic algorithm of patients presenting with chronic pain in a wrist that is still mobile, whatever the initial etiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective cohort.

Wrist Denervation: Techniques and Outcomes.

Wrist denervation is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of chronic wrist pain that can delay or eliminate the need for salvage or anatomically distorting procedure, such as proximal row carpectomy. The traditionally more extensive wrist denervation has evolved to procedures requiring fewer incisions. Efficacy of this procedure is corroborated by multiple publications either as a stand-alone procedure or as an adjunct to other procedures. This review provides an update on the status of wrist denervation.

Long-Term Outcomes of Brachial Plexus Reconstruction with Sural Nerve Autograft for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

BACKGROUND: Infants with brachial plexus birth injury who do not recover motor function spontaneously in a timely manner are candidates for brachial plexus reconstruction with nerve autograft. Outcomes of this intervention are incompletely understood. The authors present the long-term outcomes of brachial plexus reconstruction with sural nerve autograft in infants with brachial plexus birth injury. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed all infants with brachial plexus birth injury who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction with sural nerve autograft between 1992 and 2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The authors used Active Movement Scale scores to determine the presence and timing of shoulder, elbow, and wrist recovery. They assessed recovery of hand function in infants with global brachial plexus birth injury with the Raimondi scale. The number and type of secondary reconstructive procedures were identified. RESULTS: Forty-three infants who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction at age 7 ± 2 months old were followed for 7 ± 5 years. Most infants recovered antigravity elbow flexion (91 percent) and shoulder abduction (67 percent), but fewer recovered antigravity shoulder external rotation (19 percent) and wrist extension (37 percent). Mean postoperative times until observed antigravity motor strength (Active Movement Scale score >5) at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist were all greater than 12 months; evidence of initial motor recovery (Active Movement Scale score >2) was observed earlier. The mean Raimondi score in infants with global brachial plexus birth injury was 2.2 (range, 0 to 5) at final follow-up. Thirty-three children underwent 2 ± 1.2 secondary reconstructive procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Brachial plexus reconstruction with sural nerve autograft reliably results in recovery of shoulder abduction and elbow flexion, but recovery of shoulder external rotation and wrist extension is less predictable, and recovery often takes more than 1 year. Secondary procedures are often performed to optimize function. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Buying Time: Long-Term Results of Wrist Denervation and Time to Repeat Surgery.

Background: This study reviews long-term outcomes of partial wrist denervation focusing on need for and time to revision procedure. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients undergoing partial wrist denervation between 1994 and 2014. At average latest follow-up of 6.75 years (range, 1-21 years), clinical and radiographic data and need for revision surgery were recorded. Results: There were 100 wrists in 89 patients (61 male, 28 female) with average age at surgery of 54 years (range, 26-80). Principal diagnoses were arthritis (58%), inflammatory (19%), and posttraumatic arthritis (7%). Average flexion-extension arc was 83% and grip strength 75% of unaffected extremity. Average Mayo Wrist Scores improved from 48 preoperatively to 77 postoperatively. Sixty-nine percent of patients did not undergo other procedures during the time interval studied. Thirty-one percent underwent revision at an average of 26 months following denervation (range, 2-165). Conclusions: Partial wrist denervation is a motion-preserving procedure for patients with refractory wrist pain with 69% in this series requiring no further procedures. The remaining 31% experienced average symptom relief for 2 years prior to ultimately undergoing revision operation.

Arthroscopic Ganglionectomy in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic dorsal wrist ganglionectomy is an established alternative to open excision in the adult population. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare outcomes of arthroscopic and open dorsal wrist ganglionectomy in the pediatric population. METHODS: All patients who underwent arthroscopic or open dorsal wrist ganglionectomy at a single pediatric institution between 2011 and 2014 were retrospectively evaluated by chart review and telephone interview. The primary outcome variable was whether or not the cyst had recurred. Other outcome measures included the incidence of complications, and patient-rated outcome measures such as satisfaction, pain, function, and aesthetics. RESULTS: There were eight cases of arthroscopic and 19 cases of open ganglionectomy, with a mean age of 14 years. At an average follow-up of 2 years, the recurrence rate was one of eight for the arthroscopic group and two of 19 for the open group. No patients in the arthroscopic group reported functional limitations, compared with three patients in the open group. On a 10-point scar appearance scale, with 1 being not satisfied at all and 10 being highly satisfied, the median score in the arthroscopic group was 9.5, compared with 8 in the open group. No patients in the arthroscopic group had residual pain at the surgical site, compared with nine patients in the open group, a finding that was statistically significant. All patients in the arthroscopic group reported that they would undergo surgery again, whereas two patients in the open group would not undergo surgery again. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic dorsal wrist ganglionectomy compares favorably with open ganglionectomy in the pediatric population.

Dorsal Capsular Defect and Synovial Fistula to the Fourth Extensor Compartment: A Late Complication after Arthroscopic Dorsal Wrist Ganglionectomy.

Arthroscopic dorsal wrist ganglionectomy is demonstrably a safe procedure with recurrence rates comparable to open surgery. We present a patient with wrist pain following arthroscopic ganglion excision. MRI and arthroscopic findings showed a large dorsal capsular defect, synovial fistula to the fourth extensor compartment, and dorsal radiocarpal ligament resection. Ligament reconstruction and capsular imbrication resolved her symptoms. We postulate that this complication resulted from a large capsular resection. Because we feel that it can be difficult to judge the size of the debridement through an arthroscope, the need for adequate capsular resection in dorsal wrist ganglionectomy needs to be balanced by consideration of potential complications from more aggressive capsular debridement, and thus we feel that capsular resection should be limited to no more than 1 cm2.

Effects of wrist position on reciprocal inhibition and cutaneous reflex amplitudes in forearm muscles.

In the leg, amplitudes of cutaneous reflexes and reciprocal inhibition are significantly affected by joint and limb position. Comparatively little is known about such modulation in the arm. In this study, amplitudes of reciprocal inhibition (from median nerve stimulation near elbow) and cutaneous reflexes (from median or superficial radial nerve stimulation at the wrist) were measured in forearm muscle extensor carpi radialis with the hand pronated or neutral during graded voluntary activation. Significant correlations with muscle activation were found for reciprocal inhibition and cutaneous reflex amplitudes at both positions. Only cutaneous reflexes from superficial radial nerve were modulated by wrist position. This study reveals that effect of limb position is nerve-specific in cutaneous reflexes and not significant on reciprocal inhibition in the arm. This has implications for measurement and study design in those who have mobility and motor activation challenges (e.g. neurotrauma) that affect hand function.

Partial Wrist Denervation: The Evidence Behind a Small Fix for Big Problems.

Wrist denervation addresses symptomatic wrist pain without the morbidity and complication profile of more extensive surgical procedures aimed to correct the underlying pathology. The concept of wrist denervation is not new, but its practical application has been modified over the past 50 years. A variety of techniques have been described for various indications, with generally good results. In the United States, a simple, single incision partial denervation consisting of neurectomies of the anterior and posterior interosseous nerves is most commonly performed. Although data on this procedure are limited, most patients are satisfied with pain relief in the short term. There is no evidence that partial denervation procedures alter proprioception of the wrist, and this procedure shows promise as a good option for palliating pain without prolonged postoperative immobilization or leave from work. Preoperative injections do not seem to correlate well with postoperative results. Future studies are needed to assess the duration of relief and possible acceleration of underlying pathology.

Impact of carpal tunnel syndrome on ulnar nerve at wrist: Systematic review.

Considerable debate exists in the literature about possible anomalies of ulnar nerve at wrist in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We systematically reviewed the literature about electrophysiologic and morphologic changes of ulnar nerve at wrist in CTS. We carried out a comprehensive search using PubMed from 1963 through October 2017. Data were extracted and the quality of the included studies was evaluated. Twenty-eight studies were selected. Seventy-nine percent of the studies report abnormalities of the ulnar nerve conduction. There was a relation between the median and ulnar nerve conduction in almost all the papers, i.e., conduction impairment of the ulnar nerve increased with increasing severity of median nerve involvement, emerging as a process correlated with damage of the median nerve. Seventy-five percent of ultrasonographic studies report changes of ulnar nerve cross sectional area in CTS. Morphologic and functional changes of the ulnar nerve and/or Guyon canal are reported by 100% of papers addressed to this topic. Several papers quoted in this review have some flaws. The key message of present review is that electrophysiological and morphological changes of the ulnar nerve at the wrist can occur in CTS, although the possibility of an overestimation of the phenomenon needs to be considered.

Safety of dorsal wrist arthroscopy portals: A magnetic resonance study.

In wrist arthroscopy, the standard dorsal portals are the most commonly used. However, their placement can be associated with injuries to the neurovascular structures of the radiocarpal joint. The present study assessed and compared the distance of commonly used dorsal portals to radial and ulnar neurovascular structures. Forty patients (20 males, 20 females) were evaluated with T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences. We measured the distance between 1-2 and 3-4 portals and radial vascular bundle and the nearest branch of the superficial branch of radial nerve (SBRN). We also measured the distance between 4 and 5, 6/U and 6/R and ulnar vascular bundle and the nearest branch of the dorsal ulnar nerve (DUN). The median age of patients was 39 years (95% IC 36.97-43.32 years). The 3-4 portal was farther away from the vascular structure than the 1-2 portal (P < 0.0001), 4-5 portal (P = 0.008), 6/R (P < 0.0001), and 6/U portals (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the 3-4 portal was farther away from the nerve branch than the 1-2 portal (P < 0.0001), 4-5 portal (P < 0.0001), 6/R (P < 0.0001), and 6/U portals (P < 0.0001). No statistical significant differences were found between the two genders. The 3-4 and 4-5 portals are the farthest away from the neurovascular structures, and likely reduce the risk to damage these structures. On the other hand, the 1-2 and 6/U portals likely increase the risk of neurovascular damage, because of their proximity to neurovascular structures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study; Level III.

How Much Volume of Local Anesthesia and How Long Should You Wait After Injection for an Effective Wrist Median Nerve Block?

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons and emergentologists use non-ultrasound-guided wrist nerve blocks. There is little evidence to guide the ideal volume of local anesthesia or how long we should wait after injection before performing pain-free procedures. This pilot study examined time to maximal anesthesia to painful needle stick in 14 volunteer participants receiving bilateral wrist blocks of 6 versus 11 mL of local. METHODS: One surgeon performed all 14 bilateral wrist median nerve blocks in participants who remained blinded until after bandages were applied to their wrist. No one could see which wrist received the larger 11-mL volume injection versus the 6-mL block. Blinded sensory assessors then measured perceived maximal numbness time and numbness to needle stick pain in the fingertips of the median nerve distribution. RESULTS: Failure to get a complete median nerve block occurred in seven of fourteen 6-mL wrist blocks versus failure in only one of fourteen 11-mL blocks. Perceived maximal numbness occurred at roughly 40 minutes after injection, but actual numbness to painful needle stick took around 100 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete median nerve numbness occurred with both 6- and 11-mL non-ultrasound-guided blocks at the wrist. In those with complete blocks, it took a surprisingly long time of 100 minutes for maximal anesthesia to occur to painful needle stick stimuli to the fingertips of the median nerve distribution. Non-ultrasound-guided median nerve blocks at the wrist as described in this article lack reliability and take too long to work.