In vitro study on device-induced damage to blood cellular components and degradation of von Willebrand factor in a CentriMag pump-assisted circulation.

BACKGROUND: High mechanical shear stress (HMSS) generated by blood pumps during mechanical circulatory support induces blood damage (or function alteration) not only of blood cell components but also of plasma proteins. METHODS: In the present study, fresh, healthy human blood was used to prime a blood circuit assisted by a CentriMag centrifugal pump at a flow rate of 4.5 L/min under three pump pressure heads (75, 150, and 350 mm Hg) for 4 h. Blood samples were collected for analyses of plasma-free hemoglobin (PFH), von Willebrand factor (VWF) degradation and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor shedding. RESULTS: The extent of all investigated aspects of blood damage increased with increasing cross-pump pressure and duration. Loss of high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWM)-VWF in Loop 2 and Loop 3 significantly increased after 2 h. PFH, loss of HMWM-VWF, and platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor shedding showed a good linear correlation with mean shear stress corresponding to the three pump pressure heads. CONCLUSIONS: HMSS could damage red blood cells, cause pathological VWF degradation, and induce platelet activation and platelet receptor shedding. Different blood components can be damaged to different degrees by HMSS; VWF and VWF-enhanced platelet activation may be more susceptible to HMSS.

Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: The effects of temporary mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump on mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock remains unclear. METHODS: In an international, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock to receive a microaxial flow pump (Impella CP) plus standard care or standard care alone. The primary end point was death from any cause at 180 days. A composite safety end point was severe bleeding, limb ischemia, hemolysis, device failure, or worsening aortic regurgitation. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients underwent randomization, of whom 355 were included in the final analysis (179 in the microaxial-flow-pump group and 176 in the standard-care group). The median age of the patients was 67 years, and 79.2% were men. Death from any cause occurred in 82 of 179 patients (45.8%) in the microaxial-flow-pump group and in 103 of 176 patients (58.5%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.99; P = 0.04). A composite safety end-point event occurred in 43 patients (24.0%) in the microaxial-flow-pump group and in 11 (6.2%) in the standard-care group (relative risk, 4.74; 95% CI, 2.36 to 9.55). Renal-replacement therapy was administered to 75 patients (41.9%) in the microaxial-flow-pump group and to 47 patients (26.7%) in the standard-care group (relative risk, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.09). CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of a microaxial flow pump with standard care in the treatment of patients with STEMI-related cardiogenic shock led to a lower risk of death from any cause at 180 days than standard care alone. The incidence of a composite of adverse events was higher with the use of the microaxial flow pump. (Funded by the Danish Heart Foundation and Abiomed; DanGer Shock ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01633502.).

Revisiting Pulmonary Hypertension in the Era of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support - Literature Review and Case-Based Discussion.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by persistently increased pressure in the pulmonary arteries. New defining criteria for the different hemodynamic types of pulmonary hypertension (PH) that occur with left heart disease have been proposed by the task force on PH. After consideration of the changes in the general definition of PH in left heart disease, the proposed hemodynamic definition was: (1) isolated postcapillary PH: pulmonary artery wedge pressure >15 mm Hg and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <3 Woods units (WU); and (2) combined post- and precapillary PH: pulmonary artery wedge pressure >15 mm Hg, mPAP >20 mm Hg, and PVR ≥3 WU. Secondary PH is initially reversible, but eventually, it can become fixed because of the remodeling process of the pulmonary vascular system. Limitations in defining both the time for and amount of reversibility lack clarity. We discuss a case of PH as a framework to better understand these key principles in addressing patients' candidacy for heart or heart-lung transplantation. METHODS: We performed a literature search for all available contemporary data with the following terms: "pulmonary hypertension," "reversal," "Impella 5.5," "temporary mechanical support," and "LVAD" using the National Library of Medicine - PubMed and PubMed Central between 2019 and 2023. A total of 14 published papers were found with these search. From these, 3 addressed the issue of PH and reversibility in the setting of LHD after durable LVAD placement. No papers were found using Impella 5.5 and PH during this timeframe. Given the paucity of data in the field regarding temporary mechanical circulatory support and pulmonary hypertension, we present a case-based discussion to guide the reader in understanding the potential impact of this method in patients with WHO Class 2 Pulmonary hypertension. CASE: A 49-year-old woman with a medical history of acute on chronic biventricular systolic and diastolic heart failure, American College of Cardiology stage D, Stevenson profile C, New York Heart Association class IV (ejection fraction 18%) secondary to nonischemic cardiomyopathy after cardiac resynchronization therapy, pulmonary hypertension, bilateral deep vein thrombosis, and segmental pulmonary embolism presented for heart transplant evaluation. Her cardiac output and central hemodynamics were measured, and she was found to have a pulmonary artery (PA) pressure of 78/38 with a mean PA pressure of 51, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 30, transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG) 21, thermodilution cardiac output (CO) 3.35 L/min, and cardiac input (CI) 1.75 L/min/m2. Her PVR was 6.2 WU. Provocative pharmacologic testing for reversibility of PH was performed using sodium nitroprusside, which resulted in a blood pressure of 83/57 (92), heart rate 92/min, and PA pressure of 71/31, with a mean PA pressure of 44 PCWP 22, TPG 22, CO 4.8 L/min, and CI of 2.48 L/min/m2 with a PVR of 4.5 WU. Following this, the patient underwent Impella 5.5 placement through the right axillary artery to optimize afterload reduction and improve end-organ perfusion. Post-Impella hemodynamics on milrinone 0.5 mcg/kg/min demonstrated the following: blood pressure 90/66 (74), heart rate 53/min, and PA pressure of 56/29, with a mean PA pressure of 38, PCWP 24, TPG 14, CO 6 L/min, and CI of 2.9 L/min/m2 with a PVR of 2.3 WU. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular assist device support with Impella 5.5 is associated with a reduction in mPAP and PVR over weeks to months and thus plays a crucial role as a bridge to transplant. Our case and this review highlights the characteristics of PH resulting from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and discusses the important clinical issues related to the treatment of these patients. We have shown that left ventricular assist device therapy with Impella 5.5 can effectively reduce left-sided filling pressures and lead to PH improvement. We demonstrate the potential benefits of Impella 5.5 in the management of patients with WHO 2 PH and cardiogenic shock with impaired hemodynamics.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in COVID-19.

Despite aggressive care, patients with cardiopulmonary failure and COVID-19 experience unacceptably high mortality rates. The use of mechanical circulatory support devices in this population offers potential benefits but confers significant morbidity and novel challenges for the clinician. Thoughtful application of this complex technology is of the utmost importance and should be done in a multidisciplinary fashion by teams familiar with mechanical support devices and aware of the particular challenges provided by this complex patient population.

Mechanical stress-induced hemolysis of bovine blood is donor-dependent.

INTRODUCTION: In vitro hemolysis testing is an essential method for assessing the hemolytic potential of blood pumps, but has poor reproducibility. Further investigations are needed to determine the sources and extent of variability and to find a practical way to reduce the variation. METHODS: A small volume blood circulating loop driven by a Centrimag pump was established to provide relatively higher hemolysis readouts within a short run time and to be able to sequentially perform multiple repeated hemolysis tests in a working day. RESULTS: The repeatability with this system was demonstrated as the %RSD at 4.3% for the NIH or MIH from three repeated tests using the same blood. The bovine blood from different randomly selected donors was tested and gave more than a two-fold difference in NIH results (0.077 vs. 0.032 g/100 L) under the same testing conditions and same pump. This wide variation in hemolysis using bovine blood from different donors happened repeatedly. More importantly, it was observed that the difference in hemolysis test results using the blood drawn from the same donor on multiple days was narrow although the native hematocrits varied. The %RSD of NIH values obtained on five different days were 6.8%, 8.4%, 11.5%, and 7.8% for donor-specific blood from donors 1 to 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study results indicate that the mechanical stress-induced hemolysis behavior is donor-dependent. It has been also demonstrated that the reproducibility of in vitro hemolysis testing can be improved when the blood drawn from same donor is used.

In vitro thrombogenicity evaluation of rotary blood pumps by thromboelastometry.

In vitro thrombogenicity tests for rotary blood pumps (RBPs) could benefit from assessing coagulation kinematics, as RBP design improves. In this feasibility study, we investigated if the method of thromboelastometry (TEM) is able to assess coagulation kinematics under the in vitro conditions of RBP tests. We conducted in vitro thrombogenicity tests (n=4) by placing Deltastream® DP3 pumps into test loops that were filled with 150 mL of slightly anti-coagulated porcine blood, adjusted to an activated clotting time (ACT) well below clinically recommended levels. Blood samples were taken at certain time points during the experiment until a continuous decrease in pump flow indicated major thrombus formation. Blood samples were analyzed for ACT, platelet count (PLT), and several TEM parameters. While visible thrombus formation was observed in three pumps, ACT indicated an ongoing activation of coagulation, PLT might have indicated platelet consumption. Unexpectedly, most TEM results gave no clear indications. Nonetheless, TEM clotting time obtained by non-anticoagulated and chemically non-activated whole blood (HEPNATEM-CT) appeared to be more sensitive for the activation of coagulation in vitro than ACT, which might be of interest for future pump tests. However, more research regarding standardization of thrombogenicity pump tests is urgently required.