[SEAP-IAP recommendations for the collection, storage and use of biological materials of human origin and related data intended for research. Generic biobank consideration and ethical-legal review (Part II)]. / Recomendaciones de la SEAP-IAP para la recolección, el almacenamiento y el uso de materiales biológicos de origen humano y los datos relacionados, destinados a la investigación. Consideración genérica de biobanco y revisión ético-legal (Parte II).

The working group set up by the SEAP-IAP addresses in this Part II some general considerations and five particular considerations to be taken into account when a biological sample of human origin, coming from our archives, acquires a different destination from the usual one, in this case for research. From this moment on, we must follow mandatory legal and ethical rules, and the different recitals provide us with guidelines to ensure good practice, both for biological material and its associated data. The traditional task of custody given to the Pathological Anatomy is approached, as always, from the point of view of responsibility and, in this article, adjusted to its time.

Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing.

BACKGROUND: The growing diffusion of artificial intelligence, data science and digital health has highlighted the role of collection of data and biological samples, thus raising legal and ethical concerns regarding its use and dissemination. Further, the expansion of biobanking, from the basic collection of frozen specimens to the virtual biobanks of specimens and associated data that exist today, has given a revolutionary potential on healthcare systems, particularly in the field of neurological diseases, due to the inaccessibility of central nervous system and the need of non-invasive investigation approaches. Informed Consent (IC) is considered mandatory in all research studies and specimen collections, and must specifically take into account the ethical respect to the individuals to whom the used biological material and data belong. METHODS: We evaluated the attitudes of patients with neurological diseases (NP) and healthy volunteers (HV) towards the donation of biological samples to a biobank for future research studies on neurological diseases, and limitations on the use of data, related to the requirements set by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The study involved a total of 1454 subjects, including 502 HVs and 952 NPs, recruited at Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, from 2020 to 2024. RESULTS: We found that (i) almost all subjects agreed with the participation in biobanking (ii) and authorization to genetic studies (HV = 99.1%; NP = 98.3%); Regarding the return of results, (iii) we found a statistically significant difference between NP and HV, the latter preferring not to be informed of potential results (HV = 43%; NP = 11.3%; p < 0.0001); (iv) a small number limited the sharing inside European Union (EU) (HV = 4.6%; NP = 6.6%), whereas patients were more likely to refuse transfer outside EU (HV = 7.4%; NP = 10.7% p = 0.05); (v) nearly all patients agreed with the use of additional health data from EMR for research purposes (98.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Consent for the donation of material for research purposes is crucial for biobanking and biomedical research studies that use biological material of human origin. Here, we have shown that choices regarding participation in a neurological biobank can be different between HVs and NPs, even if the benefit for research and scientific progress is recognized. NP have a strong interest in being informed of possible results but limit sharing of samples, highlighting a perception of greater individual or relative benefit, while HV prefer a wide dissemination and sharing of data but not to have the return of the results, favoring a possible benefit for society and knowledge. The results underline the need to carefully manage biological material and data collected in biobanks, in compliance with the GDPR and the specific requests of donors.

Biospecimen research and the law.

In the well-known case of Henrietta Lacks, cells from her tumor were taken without consent and used more than 70 years ago to create the first immortal human cell line ("HeLa" cells). That event led to many scientific breakthroughs and to the debate about the ethics of consent and requirements for compensation. May 2024 saw two decisions by US federal courts-one related to Lacks-that could narrow the scope of research allowed on tissues obtained without consent and on nonidentified tissues, with implications for biomedicine.

Dynamic governance: A new era for consent for stem cell research.

Governance infrastructures streamline scientific and ethical provenance verification of human pluripotent stem cell (SC) lines. Yet, scientific developments (e.g., SC-derived embryo models, organoids) challenge research governance approaches to stored biospecimens, questioning the validity of informed consent (IC) models. Likewise, e-health platforms are driving major transformations in data processing, prompting a reappraisal of IC. Given these developments, participatory research platforms are identified as effective tools to promote longitudinal engagement, interactive decision-making, and dynamic governance. Learning from European initiatives piloting dynamic IC for biobanking and SC research, this Perspective explores the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic IC and governance for SC.

Perception of Polish patients with cancer of the ethical and legal issues related to biobank research.

BACKGROUND: Although biobanks have become fundamental to many research centers and contribute to medical development, they generate many ethical and legal issues that may discourage patients from donating. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To understand patients' perception of ethical and legal issues related to biobanks we conducted a survey among 548 Polish patients with cancer. RESULTS: While 93.1% of patients with cancer declared themselves willing to donate biospecimens left over after a medical procedure to a biobank, most opted for one-time consent or study-specific consent, blanket consent being less frequently preferred. Many patients believed that future use of previously collected tissues require second contact. Most patients preferred pseudonymization over anonymization of the data, and supported donors' right to withdraw informed consent at any given moment. Finally, while personal health information was the most expected form of compensation for donation, most patients suggested that all parties, including the biobank concerned, the sponsors of the research, and the donors, should own the rights to cancer tissues donated and profit from the biobank research. Patients' opinions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobank research were associated with age, sex, religiosity, education level, and place of residence. CONCLUSIONS: Since biobanks generate ethical and legal issues related to informed consent, data protection and storage, as well as the sharing of biosamples, tissue ownership, and profit sharing, that may discourage patients from donation, when asking a patient for a donation, healthcare professionals should communicate in a donor-centered manner and address patients' ethical and moral concerns related to donation and offer resources to help manage these concerns.

Biobank donation in search of public benefits and the potential impact of intellectual property rights over access to health-technologies developed: A focus on the bioethical implications.

The availability of biomaterials is a key component of health research and the development of new health-technologies (including, diagnostics, medicines, and vaccines). People are often encouraged by biobanks to donate samples altruistically to such biobanks. While empirical evidence suggests many donors are motivated by the desire to contribute towards developing new health-technologies for society. However, a tension can arise as health-technologies whose development is contributed to by donors' biomaterials will often be protected by intellectual property rights (IPRs), including patents. Patents give rightsholders control over how patented technologies are used and can be used in a way that impedes public access to technologies developed. Yet, there are no binding European legal obligations mandating disclosure to donors of how IPRs can operate over downstream health-technologies and how they could impact access to health-technologies developed, nor are there legally binding obligations to ensure public accessibility of technologies developed. Focusing on the bioethical implications posed, this article argues that the current situation can impact donors' autonomy and dignity interests. A more holistic approach is needed for biobank donation, which embeds a consideration of donors' expectations/interests from the point of donation through to how such samples are used and how health-technologies developed are accessed. We put forward avenues that seek to address such issues.

Determining the state of guidance on pediatric biobanking for researchers, HRECS, and families: Regulatory mapping of international guidance.

Biobanking-the storage of human biological samples, including tissue, blood, urine, and genetic data-raises many ethical, legal, and social issues, including confidentiality and privacy. Pediatric biobanking is more complicated, with difficulties arising because children lack capacity to consent and acquire this capacity upon maturity when the research is still ongoing. Yet given the limited availability of pediatric samples, the translational nature of biobanking presents a unique opportunity to share samples and produce clinically necessary information about pediatric development and diseases. Guidance on navigating these legal and ethical difficulties is needed for those involved in pediatric biobanking-including researchers, participants, and families, and those involved in biobank governance. This paper seeks to map the current regulatory framework governing pediatric biobanking to determine what guidance is currently offered. Regulatory mapping of current international and national guidelines on pediatric biobanking addressing the ethical, legal, and social nuances of pediatric biobanking was undertaken. This paper finds that international guidelines around biobanking are mostly for adults, and even when pediatric-specific, documents are non-binding, inconsistent, or only limited guidance is offered on a range of important issues specific to pediatric biobanks.   Conclusion: This paper shows a need for consistent, comprehensive, and clear regulation on pediatric biobanking so that research can more quickly, efficiently, and ethically be translated to useful information and treatment in pediatric care. What is Known: • Pediatric biobanking presents new opportunities to conduct valuable translational research to benefit pediatric populations. However, the storage of pediatric biological samples raises many ethical, legal and social issues-in part because child participants may be considered to lack capacity to consent but can acquire this capacity upon maturity when the research is still ongoing. Pediatric biobanks must grapple with issues of consent, confidentiality and privacy, and long-term participation regarding child participants. What is New: • Regulatory guidance on these ethical, legal, and social issues is needed for researchers, participants, and families and those involved in biobank governance. This paper identifies nationally specific and international guidance on biobanking and summarizes the guidance provided in relation to these pediatric specific issues. It finds that most guidance is non-binding and inconsistent between guidance documents and may offer only limited guidance to stakeholders. A need for consistent, comprehensive, and clear regulation on pediatric biobanking is needed at an international level to enable research.

Biobanking Legislation in Spain: Advancing or Undermining Its Ethical Values?

Biobanks are important resources for improving public health and individual care. Some legal frameworks can be more or less conducive to advancing the potential benefits of biobanks. The purpose of this article is to assess biobanking legislation and practices in Spain to determine how well they fare in such a regard. We focus here on some of the primary ethical values that ground relevant legislation and that we believe are consistent with promoting biobanking benefits: the value of scientific research; efficient use of scarce resources; and respect for the dignity of donors. We argue that although Spanish regulations advance these values in important ways, they also have provisions that undermine them and thus risk limiting the potential benefits of biobanks. We offer some suggestions for improvement.

Conhecimento e utilização do Biobanco de Dentes Humanos pela comunidade acadêmica do curso de Odontologia da UFPR / Knowledge and use of the Human Teeth Biobank by the academic community of the UFPR Dentistry course

Oobjetivo desteestudofoianalisaro perfil dos usuários do Biobanco de Dentes Humanos da Universidade Federal do Paraná (BDH-UFPR), os serviços mais procurados, se háutilização de dentes obtidos externamentee o grau de satisfaçãodos usuários.Para isso,foi aplicado um questionário eletrônico semiestruturado à comunidade interna do curso de Odontologia daUFPR, entre agosto edezembro de 2019. Um total de 300 questionários foram respondidos, sendo263 por estudantes degraduação, 4 por pós-graduandos, 24 por professores e 9 por servidores técnico-administrativos.A maioria dos estudantes erado sexo feminino entre 17e 22 anos, enquantopara osservidores (professores e técnicos) houve uma distribuição semelhante entre os sexosna faixa etária entre 40e 59 anos. Embora 80,99% dos discentes afirmaram conhecer oBDH-UFPR, apenas 50,19%usaram seus serviçose59,32% relataram játerembuscadodentesexternamente.O serviço mais utilizado foi o empréstimo de dentes para atividades de ensino, porém apenas 42,15% os devolveram após ouso.Os dentes obtidos externamente foram provenientes,principalmente, deconsultórios particulares e apenas 56,33% dos alunosrelataram sempre ter submetido-os à desinfecção/esterilização, sendo a autoclave o método mais indicado. Todos os servidores conheciam o BDH-UFPR e,dentre os professores,a maioria realizoutanto empréstimos quanto doações. Os empréstimostiveram como principal finalidade a pesquisae 63,6% relataramterem devolvido os dentes.Quanto à satisfação, a comunidade acadêmica mostrou-se predominantemente totalmente satisfeita.Por fim, ressalta-se a necessidade de ampliar as ações de conscientização para a comunidade acadêmica quanto aos aspectos éticos, legais e de biossegurança na aquisição e manipulação de dentes humanos (AU).

Thisstudy aimed toanalyze the profile of users of the Human Teeth Biobank at the Federal University of Paraná (HTB-UFPR), the most sought-after services, whether externally obtained teeth are used and the degree of user satisfaction. For this, a semi-structured electronic questionnaire was applied to the internal community of the Dentistry course at UFPR, between August and December 2019. A total of 300 questionnaires were answered, 263 by undergraduate students, 4 by graduate students, 24 by professors and 9 by technical-administrative employees. Most students were female between 17 and 22 years old, while for employees(teachers and technicians) there was a similar distribution between the sexes in the age group between 40 and 59 years old. Although 80.99% of the students claimed to know the HTB-UFPR, only 50.19% used its services and 59.32% reported having already looked for teeth externally. The most used service was the withdrawalfor teaching activities, but only 42.15% returned them after use. The teeth obtained externally came mainly from private offices and only 56.33% of the students reported having always submitted them to disinfection/sterilization, with the autoclave being the most indicated method. All employees knew the HTB-UFPR and, among the teachers, most made both withdrawaland donations. The main purpose of the withdrawals was the research and 63.6% reported having returned their teeth. As for satisfaction, the academic community was predominantly fully satisfied. Finally, it emphasizes the need to expand awareness actions for the academic community regarding ethical, legal and biosafety aspects in the acquisition and manipulation of human teeth (AU).

EBiSC best practice: How to ensure optimal generation, qualification, and distribution of iPSC lines.

Disease-relevant human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are generated worldwide for research purposes; however, without robust and practical ethical, legal, and quality standards, there is a high risk that their true potential will not be realized. Best practices for tissue procurement, iPSC reprogramming, day-to-day cultivation, quality control, and data management aligned with an ethical and legal framework must be included into daily operations to ensure their promise is maximized. Here we discuss key learning experiences from 7 years of operating the European Bank for induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (EBiSC) and recommend how to incorporate solutions into a daily management framework.

Ethical issues in oocyte banking for nonautologous use: an Ethics Committee opinion.

Ethical considerations for the banking of oocytes for nonautologous use are discussed.

Basic principles of biobanking: from biological samples to precision medicine for patients.

The term "biobanking" is often misapplied to any collection of human biological materials (biospecimens) regardless of requirements related to ethical and legal issues or the standardization of different processes involved in tissue collection. A proper definition of biobanks is large collections of biospecimens linked to relevant personal and health information (health records, family history, lifestyle, genetic information) that are held predominantly for use in health and medical research. In addition, the International Organization for Standardization, in illustrating the requirements for biobanking (ISO 20387:2018), stresses the concept of biobanks being legal entities driving the process of acquisition and storage together with some or all of the activities related to collection, preparation, preservation, testing, analysing and distributing defined biological material as well as related information and data. In this review article, we aim to discuss the basic principles of biobanking, spanning from definitions to classification systems, standardization processes and documents, sustainability and ethical and legal requirements. We also deal with emerging specimens that are currently being generated and shaping the so-called next-generation biobanking, and we provide pragmatic examples of cancer-associated biobanking by discussing the process behind the construction of a biobank and the infrastructures supporting the implementation of biobanking in scientific research.

Mini-gut feelings: perspectives of people with cystic fibrosis on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking.

Aim: Organoid technology has enormous potential for precision medicine, such as has recently been demonstrated in the field of cystic fibrosis. However, storage and use of organoids has been associated with ethical challenges and there is currently a lack of harmony in regulation and guidelines to govern the rapid emergence of 'organoid medicine'. Developing sound governance demands incorporation of the perspectives of patients as key stakeholders. Materials & methods: We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with people with cystic fibrosis to explore their perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking. Results: We identified three themes: prioritization of research and trust, ambivalent views on commercial involvement and transparency and control. Conclusion: Our study offers important insights for ethically robust governance of 'organoid medicine'.

Lay abstract Organoids are living tissues that can be grown in a lab out of stem cells, which can replicate some features of actual organs in the body. They can be used to study diseases or develop drugs, but also to test the effectiveness of therapy for a specific patient (which is called precision medicine). Organoid technology is promising for the treatment of cystic fibrosis. At the same, storing and using organoids raises ethical and practical challenges. In order to ensure that the interests of those who provide the cells are respected, we interviewed people with cystic fibrosis. Their motivation to participate in organoid research was high, but at the same time they wanted to know how their organoids are used. In addition, while they did not feel the need to be directly involved in decisions about how their tissue is used, they valued ongoing communication from biobanks about its activities.

Pediatric biobanks and parents of disabled children associations opinions on establishing children repositories in developing countries.

Pediatric biobanks are an indispensable resource for the research needed to bring advances in personalized medicine into pediatric medical care. It is unclear how or when these advances in medical care may reach children, but it is unlikely that research in adults will be adequate. We conducted the screening for a hypothetic problem in various European and American pediatric biobanks based on online surveys through e-mail distribution based on the Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT) questionnaire model. Participants in the survey had work experience in biobanking for at least 3 years or more. Contact information about the survey participants was confirmed on the social networks profiles (LinkedIn), as well as on generally available websites. First, we tried creating a model which can show the pediatric preclinical and basic clinical phase relationship and demonstrate how pediatric biobanking is linked to this process. Furthermore, we tried to look for new trends, and the final goal is to put the acquired knowledge into practice, so medical experts and patients could gain usable benefit from it. We concluded that leading positions must take into account ethical and legal aspects when considering the decision to include children in the biobank collection. However, communication with parents and children is essential. The biobank characteristics influence the biobank's motives to include children in the consent procedure. Moreover, the motives to include children influence how the children are involved in the consent procedure and the extent to which children are able to make voluntary decisions as part of the consent procedure.

The Ethics of Repurposing Previously Collected Research Biospecimens in an Infectious Disease Pandemic.

In the early days of a pandemic, repurposing biospecimens from established research projects could prove to be extraordinarily useful in achieving substantial and timely public health benefits. Nonetheless, there are potential ethical and regulatory uncertainties that may impede access to those valuable biospecimens. In this article, we argue that there should be a presumption in favor of using previously collected identifiable research biospecimens without reconsent to directly address an infectious disease pandemic, assuming certain conditions are met. This argument fills a unique yet critical gap in decision-making where the specific consent accompanying the identifiable biospecimens would not otherwise permit repurposing. Further, it suggests that even if gaining reconsent is feasible, doing so in a fast-moving crisis is not necessary. This analysis also attempts to address the ethical concerns of public health authorities who already may have the power to use such specimens but are reluctant to do so.

Identifying the nature and extent of public and donor concern about the commercialisation of biobanks for genomic research.

Various forms of private investment are considered necessary for the sustainability of biobanks, yet pose significant challenges to public trust. To manage this tension, it is vital to identify the concerns of relevant stakeholders to ensure effective and acceptable policy and practice. This research examines the aspects of commercialisation that are of most concern to the Australian public (n = 800) and patients who had donated their tissue to two large disease specific (cancer) public biobanks (n = 564). Overall, we found a commercialisation effect (higher support for public relative to private) in relation to funding, research location and access to stored biospecimens. The effect was strongest for research locations and access compared to funding. A latent class analysis revealed the pattern of concern differed, with the majority (34.1%) opposing all aspects of commercialisation, a minority supporting all (15.7%), one quarter (26.8%) opposing some (sharing and selling tissue) but not others (research locations and funding), and a group who were unsure about most aspects but opposed selling tissue (23.5%). Patient donors were found to be more accepting of and unsure about most aspects of commercialisation. Members of the (general) public who were motivated to participate in biobanking were more likely to oppose some aspects while supporting others, while those who indicated they would not donate to a biobank were more likely to oppose all aspects of commercialisation. The results suggest that approaches to policy, engagement and awareness raising need to be tailored for different publics and patient groups to increase participation.

Regulating biobanks: an ethical analysis of the Spanish law and the new challenges of the bigdata-driven biomedical research / Regulando los biobancos: un análisis ético de la ley española y los nuevos retos de la investigación biomédica con datos masivos

In the European landscape, Spain represents a positive reference point when it comes to biobank regulation. Indeed, at the beginning of XXI century, the Spanish legislation has promptly responded to challenges posed by new biotechnologies and advances in genomics in the field of biomedical research by enacting in 2007 the Ley de Investigación Biomédica in order to keep up with the paradigm shift. Over the past 10 years, this Spanish framework along with the Real Decreto 1716/2011 has hold the merit to tackle the most controversial ethical issues related to use of human samples and personal data in biomedical research and biobanking (e.g. broad consent, secondary uses, governance, etc.). However, today the regulation of biomedical research and biobanks has to deal with big data, artificial intelligence and data-intensive research which have brought a number of challenges and controversies. The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, I will analyse from an ethical point of view the merits of Spanish regulation on biobanking in order to draw some lessons for the still unregulated situation in other Member States. Secondly, I will discuss the big data paradigm shift in biomedical research and question if the ethical and legal framework introduced the Spanish law at the beginning of the century is still able to hold the ground with the new contextual and societal challenges. In this respect, I will identify some opportunities for implementation and suggest strategies to achieve them in the specific context of biobanks (AU)

En el panorama europeo, España representa un punto de referencia positivo en lo que respecta a la regulación de los biobancos. De hecho, a principios del siglo XXI, la legislación española ha respondido rápidamente a los retos planteados por los avances de la biotecnología y la genómica en el campo de la investigación biomédica mediante la promulgación en 2007 de la Ley de Investigación Biomédica para mantenerse al día con el cambio de paradigma. Durante los últimos 10 años, este marco español junto con el Real Decreto 1716/2011 ha tenido el mérito de abordar las cuestiones éticas más controvertidas relacionadas con los biobancos. Sin embargo, hoy la regulación de la investigación biomédica y los biobancos tiene que lidiar con la inteligencia artificial e investigaciones con gran cantidad de datos que han planteado una serie de desafíos y controversias. El objetivo de este artículo es doble. En primer lugar, analizaré desde un punto de vista ético los méritos de la regulación española sobre biobancos con el fin de extraer algunas lecciones de la situación aún no regulada en otros Estados miembros. En segundo lugar, trataré el cambio de paradigma en la investigación biomédica y me preguntaré si el marco ético y legal que introdujo la ley española a principios de siglo todavía es capaz de mantenerse firmeante los nuevos desafíos contextuales y sociales. En este sentido, identificaré algunas oportunidades de implementación y sugeriré estrategias para lograrlas en el contexto específico de los biobancos (AU)

En el panorama europeu, Espanya representa un punt de referència positiu pel que fa a la regulació dels biobancs. De fet, a principis del segle XXI, la legislació espanyola ha respost ràpidament als reptes plantejats pels avanços de la biotecnologia i la genòmica en el camp de la recerca biomèdica mitjançant la promulgació en 2007 de la Llei de Recerca Biomèdica per a mantenir-se al dia amb el canvi de paradigma. Durant els últims 10 anys, aquest marc espanyol juntament amb el Reial decret 1716/2011 ha tingut el mèrit d'abordar les qüestions ètiques més controvertides relacionades amb els biobancs. No obstant això, avui la regulació de la recerca biomèdica i els biobancs ha de bregar amb la intel·ligència artificial i recerques amb gran quantitat de dades que han plantejat una sèrie de desafiaments i controvèrsies. L'objectiu d'aquest article és doble. En primer lloc, analitzaré des d'un punt de vista ètic els mèrits de la regulació espanyola sobre biobancs amb la finalitat d'extreure algunes lliçons de la situació encara no regulada en altres Estats membres. En segon lloc, tractaré el canvi de paradigma en la recerca biomèdica i em preguntaré si el marc ètic i legal que va introduir la llei espanyola a principis de segle encara és capaç de mantenir-se ferm davant els nous desafiaments contextuals i socials. En aquest sentit, identificaré algunes oportunitats d'implementació i suggeriré estratègies per a aconseguir-les en el context específic dels biobancs (AU)

Demographic and prosocial intrapersonal characteristics of biobank participants and refusers: the findings of a survey in the Netherlands.

Research in genetics relies heavily on voluntary contributions of personal data. We aimed to acquire insights into the differences between participants and refusers of participation in a Dutch population-based biobank. Accordingly, we assessed the demographic and prosocial intrapersonal characteristics of respondents who participated (n = 2615) or refused to participate (n = 404) in the Lifelines biobank and databank. Our results indicated that health-related values critically influence participation decisions. The participation threshold for Lifelines was determined by an absence of health-related values and of trust in government. Therefore, considering these factors in communication and recruitment strategies could enhance participation in biomedical research. No indications were found of a stronger general prosociality of participants or their trust in researchers beyond the context of biobanking. This emphasizes the contextual understanding of the decision of participation in biobanking. Our findings may contribute to improving recruitment strategies by incorporating relevant values and/or highlighting prosocial benefits. Moreover, they foreground the need to address trust issues in collaborations between data repositories and commercial companies. Future research should explore how prosocial intrapersonal characteristics drive participation and withdrawal decisions and relate to contextual attributes.

Morocco's First Biobank: Establishment, Ethical Issues, Biomedical Research Opportunities, and Challenges.

BACKGROUND: Biobanks are highly organized infrastructures that allow the storage of human biological specimens associated with donors' personal and clinical data. These infrastructures play a key role in the development of translational medical research. In this context, we launched, in November 2015, the first biobank in Morocco (BRO Biobank) in order to promote biomedical research and provide opportunities to include Moroccan and North African ethnic groups in international biomedical studies. Here, we present the setup and the sample characteristics of BRO Biobank. METHODS: Patients were recruited at several departments of two major health-care centers in the city of Oujda. Healthy donors were enrolled during blood donation campaigns all over Eastern Morocco. From each participant, personal, clinical, and biomedical data were collected, and several biospecimens were stored. Standard operating procedures have been established in accordance with international guidelines on human biobanks. RESULTS: Between November 2015 and July 2020, 2446 participants were recruited into the BRO Biobank, of whom 2013 were healthy donors, and 433 were patients. For healthy donors, the median age was 35 years with a range between 18 and 65 years and the consanguinity rate was 28.96%. For patients, the median age was 11 years with a range between 1 day and 83 years. Among these patients, 55% had rare diseases (hemoglobinopathies, intellectual disabilities, disorders of sex differentiation, myopathies, etc.), 13% had lung cancer, 4% suffered from hematological neoplasms, 3% were from the kidney transplantation project, and 25% had unknown diagnoses. The BRO Biobank has collected 5092 biospecimens, including blood, white blood cells, plasma, serum, urine, frozen tissue, FFPE tissue, and nucleic acids. A sample quality control has been implemented and suggested that samples of the BRO Biobank are of high quality and therefore suitable for high-throughput nucleic acid analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The BRO Biobank is the largest sample collection in Morocco, and it is ready to provide samples to national and international research projects. Therefore, the BRO Biobank is a valuable resource for advancing translational medical research.