Managing COPD exacerbations in primary care.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common but underdiagnosed lung condition that is frequently managed inappropriately. It impacts poorest communities most, where health inequalities are greatest. New acute symptoms of breathlessness, cough, sputum production and wheeze should prompt clinical suspicion of underlying COPD in someone who is a current or ex-smoker (or has exposure to other risk factors) and be followed by referral for quality-assured spirometry once recovered. Management of COPD exacerbations in primary care includes use of short-acting bronchodilators if mild, and antibiotics and a short course of oral prednisolone if moderate/severe. Hospital at home schemes are safe and effective and should be considered for some patients exacerbating in the community; these are increasingly supported by remote monitoring ('virtual wards'). New or worsening hypoxia is an indication for hospital admission and therefore oxygen saturation monitoring is an important part of exacerbation management; clinicians should be aware of patient safety alerts around use of pulse oximeters. Exacerbations drive poor health status and lung function decline and therefore asking about exacerbation frequency at planned reviews and taking action to reduce these is an important part of long-term COPD care. An exacerbation is an opportunity to ensure that fundamentals of good care are addressed. Patients should be supported to understand and act on exacerbations through a supported self-management plan; prompt treatment is beneficial but should be balanced by careful antibiotic and corticosteroid stewardship. COPD rescue packs on repeat prescription are not recommended.

Adherence to single inhaler triple therapy and digital inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a literature review and protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TRICOLON study).

BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is a significant problem in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Efforts to address this issue are receiving increased attention. Simplifying treatment by prescribing single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) as an alternative to multi-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) or with smart inhalers are often considered potential solutions. However, the actual impact of these innovations on adherence and clinical outcomes is unclear. METHODS: To address this knowledge gap we first conducted a literature review focusing on two research questions: 1) the difference in adherence between SITT and MITT users in COPD, and 2) the effect of smart inhalers on adherence in COPD. Separate searches were conducted in PubMed and two authors independently assessed the articles. In addition, we present a protocol for a study to acquire knowledge for the gaps identified. RESULTS: To address the first research question, 8 trials were selected for further review. All trials were observational, i.e. randomized controlled trials were lacking. Seven of these trials showed higher adherence and/or persistence in patients on SITT compared with patients on MITT. In addition, four studies showed a positive effect of SITT on various clinical outcomes. For the second research question, 11 trials were selected for review. While most of the studies showed a positive effect of smart inhalers on adherence, there was considerable variation in the results regarding their effect on other clinical outcomes. The TRICOLON (TRIple therapy COnvenience by the use of one or multipLe Inhalers and digital support in ChrONic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) trial aims to improve understanding regarding the effectiveness of SITT and smart inhalers in enhancing adherence. This open-label, randomized, multi-center study will enroll COPD patients requiring triple therapy at ten participating hospitals. In total, 300 patients will be randomized into three groups: 1) MITT; 2) SITT; 3) SITT with digital support through a smart inhaler and an e-health platform. The follow-up period will be one year, during which three methods of measuring adherence will be used: smart inhaler data, self-reported data using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) questionnaire, and drug analysis in scalp hair samples. Finally, differences in clinical outcomes between the study groups will be compared. DISCUSSION: Our review suggests promising results concerning the effect of SITT, as opposed to MITT, and smart inhalers on adherence. However, the quality of evidence is limited due to the absence of randomized controlled trials and/or the short duration of follow-up in many studies. Moreover, its impact on clinical outcomes shows considerable variation. The TRICOLON trial aims to provide solid data on these frequently mentioned solutions to non-adherence in COPD. Collecting data in a well-designed randomized controlled trial is challenging, but the design of this trial addresses both the usefulness of SITT and smart inhalers while ensuring minimal interference in participants' daily lives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05495698 (Clinicaltrials.gov), registered at 08-08-2022. Protocol version: version 5, date 27-02-2023.

Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids from Patients with COPD; Effect on Exacerbation Frequency and Lung Function: A Systematic Review.

Background: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations. It should only be prescribed to COPD patients who are not adequately controlled by dual long-acting bronchodilator therapy and who have ≥2 exacerbations per year and a blood eosinophil count ≥300cells/µL. ICS therapy is widely prescribed outside guidelines to COPD patients, making ICS withdrawal an important consideration. This systematic review aims to provide an up-to-date analysis of the effect of ICS withdrawal on exacerbation frequency, change in lung function (FEV1) and to determine the proportion of COPD patients who resume ICS therapy following withdrawal. Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies which compared ICS withdrawal with ICS continuation treatment were included. Cochrane Central, Web of Science, CINHAL, Embase and OVID Medline were searched. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Quality assessment of RCTs was conducted using GRADE. Meta-analysis of post-hoc analyses of RCTs of ICS withdrawal, stratified by blood eosinophil count (BEC), was undertaken. Results: Ten RCTs (6642 patients randomised) and 6 observational studies (160,029 patients) were included in the results. When ICS was withdrawn and long-acting bronchodilator therapy was maintained, there was no consistent difference in exacerbation frequency or lung function change between the ICS withdrawal and continuation trial arms. The evidence for these effects was of moderate quality. There was insufficient evidence to draw a firm conclusion on the proportion of patients who resumed ICS therapy following withdrawal (estimated range 12-93% of the participants). Discussion: Withdrawal of ICS therapy from patients with COPD is safe and feasible but should be accompanied by maintenance of bronchodilation therapy for optimal outcomes.

[Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): eosinophilia and novel drug therapies]. / Chronisch-obstruktive Lungenerkrankung (COPD) ­ Eosinophilie und neue Arzneimitteltherapien.

BACKGROUND: The phenotyping of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has increasingly gained attention in recent years, as it leads to new and individualized therapeutic concepts. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to provide an overview of the heterogeneity of COPD and to summarize current drug therapy concepts, particularly in the context of eosinophilic airway inflammation. DATA: Several prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled studies have shown a reduction in exacerbations and overall mortality with inhaled triple therapy using an inhaled corticosteroid and dual bronchodilation. The higher the eosinophils in the blood, the greater the expected effect. In addition, a reduction in exacerbations with biologics in COPD with eosinophilia has been demonstrated for dupilumab. Eosinophil-guided therapy for acute exacerbations is the subject of current research. CONCLUSION: For COPD without exacerbations, dual bronchodilation forms the basis of inhaled therapy. With exacerbations, inhaled triple therapy is indicated for patients with a blood eosinophil count of ≥ 300/µl. This type of treatment may also be useful when eosinophils are between 100 and 300/µl. Therapy with dupilumab is a possible option for the eosinophilic phenotype in the near future.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of triple therapy and non-triple therapy interventions for COPD: an overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Some systematic reviews (SRs) on triple therapy (consisting of long-acting ß2-agonist, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and inhaled corticosteroid, LABA/LAMA/ICS) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have reported conflicting results. As the number of syntheses increases, the task of identifying and interpreting evidence becomes increasingly complex and demanding. OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy and safety of triple therapy for COPD. DESIGN: Overview of SRs. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted comprehensive searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant SRs that compared triple therapy with any non-triple therapy for COPD, from the inception of these databases until 1 June 2023. The AMSTAR 2 and GRADE tools were utilized to assess the quality of the included studies and the evidence for each outcome. RESULTS: Eighteen SRs encompassing 30 original studies and involving 47,340 participants were analyzed. The overall AMSTAR 2 rating revealed that 3 SRs were of low quality, 13 SRs were of critically low quality, and 2 SRs were of high quality. No high-certainty evidence revealed a significant advantage of triple therapy in improving lung function or reducing acute exacerbations. However, all evidence, including one high certainty, supported the benefits of improving quality of life. Regarding all-cause mortality, no significant difference was found when compared to LAMA or ICS/LABA; however, high-certainty evidence confirmed its effectiveness when compared with LABA/LAMA. Notably, high-certainty evidence indicated that triple therapy was associated with a significant increase in the risk of pneumonia compared to LABA/LAMA. CONCLUSION: Triple therapy demonstrated notable benefits in improving lung function, reducing exacerbations, improving quality of life, and reducing all-cause mortality. However, it is important to note that it may also significantly increase the risk of pneumonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This overview protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42023431548).

An Exploratory Study of Physician Decision-Making When Treating Uncontrolled COPD.

Purpose: Current guidelines recommend triple therapy maintenance inhalers for patients with recurrent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, these maintenance therapies are underutilized. This study aimed to understand how physicians make COPD treatment decisions, and how combination maintenance therapies are utilized in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: This exploratory, hypothesis-generating, non-interventional study used a cross-sectional online survey that was administered to a sample of practicing physicians in the United States. The survey included five fictitious vignettes detailing common symptoms experienced by patients with COPD. Survey questions included factors physicians consider in their decisions, and perceived barriers to prescribing treatments. Repeated measures multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate how likely physicians were to switch to triple therapy versus no change to patient's current maintenance therapy or change to another maintenance therapy. Results: In total, 200 physicians completed the survey. Cost of treatment and patient access to treatment were reported as the most common barriers physicians consider in their prescribing decisions. Physicians were more likely to switch a patient's maintenance inhaler to triple therapy versus no change to maintenance inhaler if they considered the patient's history of new symptoms, insurance status, and clinical guidelines in their decision. Physicians with more experience treating patients with COPD, and those who treat more patients with COPD per week, were more likely to switch to triple therapy versus no change to maintenance inhaler. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the complexity of factors that can influence physicians' decisions when prescribing treatments for patients with COPD, including considerations of treatment cost, patient access and adherence, patient comorbidities, efficacy of current treatment, clinical guidelines, and provider's level of experience treating COPD. Further research may help elucidate the relative importance of the factors influencing physicians' decisions and inform what types of decision-support tools would be most beneficial.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms can be effectively managed with maintenance therapies, which are treatments that are taken routinely to help improve symptoms. A combination of three different therapies (triple therapy maintenance) has been shown to be more effective than a combination of two different therapies (dual therapy maintenance) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. However, maintenance therapies, including triple therapy, are underutilized. This study aimed to explore how physicians make their treatment decisions for patients with COPD, and how combination maintenance therapies are utilized. To do so, we administered a survey to a sample of practicing physicians in the United States. The survey included five clinically based, fictitious profiles, or vignettes, of patients with COPD, with common symptoms and patient characteristics being described. Physicians were then asked to answer questions about what treatment they would prescribe for each patient, and any factors they considered when deciding on a treatment for a patient. We found that cost of treatment and patient access to treatment were the most common barriers that physicians considered when choosing a treatment. Physicians were also more likely to switch a patient's maintenance inhaler to a triple therapy maintenance inhaler if they considered the patient's history of new symptoms, patient's insurance status, and clinical guidelines when making their decisions. Our study shows that there are many complex factors that influence physicians' decisions when deciding on a treatment for patients with COPD.

Salbutamol Easyhaler provides non-inferior relief of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in comparison to Ventoline Evohaler with spacer: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol is a cornerstone for relieving acute asthma symptoms, typically administered through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) offer an alternative, but concerns exist whether DPIs provide an effective relief during an obstructive event. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to show non-inferiority of Salbutamol Easyhaler DPI compared to pMDI with spacer in treating methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Applicability of Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler DPI as a reliever was also assessed. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group trial in subjects sent to methacholine challenge (MC) test for asthma diagnostics. Participants with at least 20 % decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were randomized to receive Salbutamol Easyhaler (2 × 200 µg), Ventoline Evohaler with spacer (4 × 100 µg) or Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler (2 × 160/4.5 µg) as a reliever. The treatment was repeated if FEV1 did not recover to at least -10 % of baseline. RESULTS: 180 participants (69 % females, mean age 46 yrs [range 18-80], FEV1%pred 89.5 [62-142] %) completed the trial. Salbutamol Easyhaler was non-inferior to pMDI with spacer in acute relief of bronchoconstriction showing a -0.083 (95 % LCL -0.146) L FEV1 difference after the first dose and -0.032 (-0.071) L after the last dose. The differences in FEV1 between Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler and Salbutamol pMDI with spacer were -0.163 (-0.225) L after the first and -0.092 (-0.131) L after the last dose. CONCLUSION: The study confirms non-inferiority of Salbutamol Easyhaler to Ventoline Evohaler with spacer in relieving acute bronchoconstriction, making Easyhaler a sustainable and safe reliever for MC test and supports its use during asthma attacks.

Curve-Modelling and Machine Learning for a Better COPD Diagnosis.

Background: Development of new tools in artificial intelligence has an outstanding performance in the recognition of multidimensional patterns, which is why they have proven to be useful in the diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Methods: This was an observational analytical single-centre study in patients with spirometry performed in outpatient medical care. The segment that goes from the peak expiratory flow to the forced vital capacity was modelled with quadratic polynomials, the coefficients obtained were used to train and test neural networks in the task of classifying patients with COPD. Results: A total of 695 patient records were included in the analysis. The COPD group was significantly older than the No COPD group. The pre-bronchodilator (Pre BD) and post-bronchodilator (Post BD) spirometric curves were modelled with a quadratic polynomial, and the coefficients obtained were used to feed three neural networks (Pre BD, Post BD and all coefficients). The best neural network was the one that used the post-bronchodilator coefficients, which has an input layer of 3 neurons and three hidden layers with sigmoid activation function and two neurons in the output layer with softmax activation function. This system had an accuracy of 92.9% accuracy, a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 94.3% when assessed using expert judgment as the reference test. It also showed better performance than the current gold standard, especially in specificity and negative predictive value. Conclusion: Artificial Neural Networks fed with coefficients obtained from quadratic and cubic polynomials have interesting potential of emulating the clinical diagnostic process and can become an important aid in primary care to help diagnose COPD in an early stage.

[Quelles indications pour la corticothérapie dans la BPCO ?] / What are the indications for corticosteroid therapy in COPD?

WHAT ARE THE INDICATIONS FOR CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY IN COPD? In stable state chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) should be used in case of frequent exacerbation only, associated with long-term bronchodilators including long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). When frequent exacerbations persist despite dual inhaled therapy (LABA + CSI or LABA+LAMA), triple inhaled therapy (LAMA+LABA+CSI) is indicated. In COPD exacerbation, the level of evidence for systemic corticosteroids is very low, justifying not to systematically prescribe systemic corticosteroids and when used to restrict this use to short-term (5 days) and low doses.

QUELLES SONT LES INDICATIONS POUR LA CORTICOTHÉRAPIE DANS LA BPCO ? Dans la bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (BPCO) à l'état stable, les corticostéroïdes inhalés (CSI) ne sont à utiliser qu'en cas d'exacerbations fréquentes, en association avec des bronchodilatateurs de longue durée d'action de type bêta-2-agoniste de longue durée d'action (LABA) et anticholinergique de longue durée d'action (LAMA). En cas de persistance d'exacerbations fréquentes malgré une bithérapie inhalée (LABA-CSI ou LAMA-LABA), une triple thérapie (LAMA-LABA CSI) peut être proposée. En cas d'exacerbation de BPCO, le niveau de preuve de la corticothérapie systémique est faible, justifiant ne pas recourir à ce traitement de façon systématique ou de le réaliser en cures courtes (cinq jours) et à faibles doses quand il est prescrit.

Prescription patterns and effectiveness of medications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective study of real-world settings.

This study aimed to define real-world prescription patterns in Korea and compare the effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) medications. We used national claims data provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Korea and examined patients who were first diagnosed with COPD and started treatment between May 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, with no change in drug regimen. Among 30,784 patients with COPD, long-acting ß2 agonist (LABA) combined with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) (32.7%), inhaled corticosteroid-LABA (ICS-LABA) (25.6%), LAMA (18.3%), ICS (5.8%), or LABA (4.6%) were prescribed as the first-choice inhalers. The use of LABA-LAMA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.248-0.584), LAMA (HR, 0.320-0.641), ICS-LABA (HR, 0.325-0.643), and xanthine (HR, 0.563-0.828) significantly reduced the total and severe exacerbation rates compared with no use of each medication. However, the use of ICS or LABA individually did not yield such effects. The continued use of LABA-LAMA, LAMA, and ICS-LABA showed a significant effect on exacerbation rate, whereas the long-term use of ICS, LABA, and xanthine did not. Moreover, some high doses of ICS-LABA did not show significant effects. This real-world study revealed that LAMA and/or LABA could be the first choice of therapy, as recommended by recent guidelines. However, ICS, xanthine, and high-dose ICS-LABA are still being prescribed frequently as first-line drugs in Korea.

Bronchiolitis: Safely Doing Less Is the Next Big Thing.

Bronchiolitis is a viral lower respiratory tract infection primarily affecting children younger than 2 years; a common cause of health care encounters, including hospitalization; and a considerable economic burden for health care systems in the United States and worldwide. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) most recently updated its bronchiolitis guideline in 2014 and reaffirmed supportive care as the mainstay of treatment. Despite these recommendations, there is still significant variability in care provided for these children, especially in bronchodilator usage, radiography, and high-flow nasal cannula. Since the 2014 AAP guideline, many pediatric hospitalists have undertaken quality initiatives to improve the adherence to published guidelines, yet a large gap remains between what is recommended and what is practiced. This article presents research on the efficacy of common interventions as well as an introduction to diagnostics and treatments potentially on the horizon. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(6):e223-e228.].

Relationships between symptoms and lung function in asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a real-life setting: the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY.

BACKGROUND: The relationships between spirometric assessment of lung function and symptoms (including exacerbations) in patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a real-life setting are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationships between baseline post-bronchodilator (post-BD) spirometry measures of lung function and symptoms and exacerbations in patients with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD. DESIGN: The NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY) is a global, prospective, 3-year observational study. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate relationships. Spirometry measures were assessed as percent predicted (%pred). Symptoms were assessed at baseline, and exacerbations were assessed at baseline and Year 1. RESULTS: A total of 11,181 patients in NOVELTY had spirometry data (asthma, n = 5903; COPD, n = 3881; asthma + COPD, n = 1397). A 10% lower post-BD %pred forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) - adjusted for age and sex - were significantly associated with dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council ⩾ grade 2), frequent breathlessness [St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)], frequent wheeze attacks (SGRQ), nocturnal awakening (Respiratory Symptoms Questionnaire; ⩾1 night/week), and frequent productive cough (SGRQ). Lower post-BD %pred FEV1 and, to a lesser extent, lower post-BD %pred FVC were significantly associated with ⩾1 physician-reported exacerbation at baseline or Year 1. This association was stronger in patients with COPD than in those with asthma. CONCLUSION: In a real-life setting, reduced lung function is consistently associated with symptoms in patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma + COPD. The relationship with exacerbations is stronger in COPD only than in asthma. TRAIL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02760329 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Relationships between symptoms and lung function in asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a study performed in a real-life setting: the NOVELTY studyBackground: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have many symptoms in common. To confirm diagnosis, doctors use spirometry, a test to measure the amount of air that can be breathed out from the lungs and how fast it can be blown out. The relationship between these measurements and symptoms in asthma and COPD is not well understood.Objectives: The aim of this research is to describe the characteristics, treatment, and impact of asthma and/or COPD in patients who are receiving their usual medical care.Methods: NOVELTY is a large study of around 12,000 patients across 19 countries. This analysis of NOVELTY looked at the relationships between two spirometry measurements and the symptoms of asthma and/or COPD experienced by patients. The spirometry measurements were: - forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) ­ the amount of air that can be blown out of the lungs in 1 second- forced vital capacity (FVC) ­ the amount of air that can be forcibly breathed out from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possibleResults: The lower the FEV₁ and FVC, the more common the symptoms of breathlessness, wheeze attacks, night-time awakening, and coughing up of phlegm or mucus. These relationships were similar for FEV₁ and FVC. Lower FEV₁ was more strongly associated with worse symptoms in COPD than in asthma.Conclusion: These findings help to improve our understanding of the relationships between spirometry measures and symptoms in patients with asthma and/or COPD.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Low-Value Testing and Treatment of Bronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND: Viral testing and treatments such as systemic steroids and inhaled corticosteroids are low-value care for routine bronchiolitis. We sought to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on low-value care in young children with bronchiolitis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using the Pediatric Health Information Systems database. We included children <2 years seen in a pediatric emergency department for bronchiolitis. We selected a priori 3 study periods: September 2018 to February 2020 (prepandemic), March 2020 to August 2022 (early pandemic), and September 2022 to January 2023 (late pandemic). Low-value care included respiratory syncytial virus testing, chest radiography, albuterol, or corticosteroids and was compared across the 3 time periods. RESULTS: At least 1 element of low-value care was provided in 45%, 47%, and 44% of encounters in the prepandemic, early pandemic, and late pandemic periods, respectively. There was little variation in the use of albuterol and chest radiography across time periods and a slight increase in systemic corticosteroid use from prepandemic to early and late pandemic groups. Viral testing increased from 36% prepandemic to 65% early pandemic and 67% late pandemic, which appeared to be driven by SARS-CoV-2 testing and combination viral testing. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically significant change in low-value care for bronchiolitis during the pandemic. Because of SARS-CoV-2 testing, however, overall frequency of viral testing increased dramatically over time. This marked increase in overall viral testing should be taken into consideration for future quality improvement efforts.

Acute viral bronchiolitis phenotype in response to glucocorticoid and bronchodilator treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether infants admitted to hospital with Acute Viral Bronchiolitis (AVB), who received glucocorticoids and bronchodilators, and who had an atopic phenotype, spent less time in hospital and/or less time on oxygen therapy when compared to those who did not have the phenotype. METHOD: A cross-sectional, retrospective epidemiological study was developed with data from medical records of infants admitted to hospital due to AVB from 2012 to 2019 in a sentinel public hospital. It was verified that the frequency of prescription of glucocorticoids, bronchodilators and antibiotics. Length of stay and oxygen therapy duration were then compared in the group that used glucocorticoids and bronchodilators between those who had a personal or family history of atopy and those who did not. Subsequently, the length of hospital stay was compared among infants who received antibiotic therapy and those who did not. RESULTS: Fifty-eight infants were included. Of these, 62.1 % received an antibiotic, 100 % a bronchodilator and 98.3 % a glucocorticoid. When comparing infants without a family history of atopy, those who received antibiotics had a longer hospital stay (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The presence of an atopic phenotype did not interfere with the length of stay and/or oxygen therapy duration of those who received bronchodilators and glucocorticoids. Increased length of stay of infants without a family history of atopy, who used antibiotics without evidence of bacterial co-infection, and the high frequency of prescription of non-recommended drugs call attention to stricter protocol implementation and professional training in AVB diagnosis and care.

Comparison of Forced Oscillation Technique, Lung Volumes by Body Plethysmography, and Spirometry in Moderate Persistent Adult Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Spirometry is used extensively, but airway oscillometry is gaining acceptance for evaluating obstructive airway disorders. Moderate persistent asthma requires daily treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We aimed to examine the relationship between airway oscillometry and lung volumes, which are the markers of lung physiology in obstructive airway disease and spirometry in the real-world clinical setting. A total of 72 adults with moderate persistent asthma followed up in our outpatient department from November 2021 to August 2022, and their clinical details and tests of spirometry, forced oscillation technique (FOT), and lung volumes by body plethysmography (BP) performed before and after bronchodilator administration were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 40 years, and the majority (57%) were females. FOT detected airflow limitation in 12 of the 31 patients with normal spirometry. BP detected abnormalities in more patients than both spirometry and FOT (91.6 vs 73.6%, p < 0.001). Respiratory resistance 5 (R5) had a negative correlation with functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC). Reactance 5 (X5) correlated positively with inspiratory capacity (IC) and TLC and negatively with reserve volume (RV)/TLC ratio. A positive correlation was found between IC/TLC% and postbronchodilator X5 and between R5 and 19 and RV/TLC. R5 had a negative and X5 had a positive correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, and maximal mid expiratory flow rates (MMEF). ∇X5 had a negative correlation with FEV1, MMEF, and FEV1/FVC. Spirometry detected postbronchodilator responsiveness in more patients than FOT when only the R5 criterion was used and in a comparable number when the X5 criterion was added. ∇X5 and R5-R19/R5 declined significantly after bronchodilators. CONCLUSION: We concluded that there is a moderate correlation between FOT and spirometry and lung volumes by BP. FOT and spirometry should be used together to identify airflow obstruction and postbronchodilator responsiveness in asthma. Lung volumes by BP identify more abnormalities in adults with asthma than both spirometry and FOT. Thresholds to define postbronchodilator responsiveness (PBDR) for ∇X5 and R5-R19 need to be defined.

Risk Factors Associated with Misuse of Soft Mist Inhaler in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Purpose: The use of inhaled bronchodilators is the mainstay of treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although the soft mist inhaler (SMI) was developed to overcome the disadvantages of pressurized metered dose and drug powder inhalers, misuse during handling has been frequently observed in many studies. However, few studies have focused on SMI misuse among patients with COPD. Thus, we aimed to assess and identify the risk factors associated with SMI misuse among patients with COPD. Patient and Methods: In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional study, we enrolled patients with COPD who were undergoing SMI treatment between January 2018 and March 2020. An advanced nurse practitioner assessed the participants' handling of the device by using a check list. Results: Among 159 participants, 136 (85.5%) reported inhaler misuse. Duration of COPD and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores were positively associated with inhaler misuse; adherence and education level were negatively associated with inhaler misuse. In the multivariable analysis, a low educational level (less than high school), high CAT score (≥ 10), and short duration of COPD (≤ 2 years) were identified as risk factors for SMI misuse. Conclusion: SMI misuse remains common among patients with COPD. Therefore, clinicians should pay close attention to their patients using SMIs, especially in the early period after the diagnosis of COPD.

The Effect of Priming new Plastic Spacers with 20 Puffs Salbutamol on Bronchodilator Response in Asthmatic Children.

The static charge on the plastic body of spacers attracts drug aerosols, reducing the drug available for inhalation from plastic spacers. Some instructions exist to decrease the electric charge on plastic spacers, such as priming them with salbutamol (20 puffs) before use. This study investigates whether priming plastic spacer devices with this method can improve the bronchodilator test result. This study included children with stable mild to moderate asthma. All subjects underwent two pulmonary function tests to evaluate their bronchodilator response on separate days at 24-48 hours intervals. On each day, spirometry was performed at the baseline and 15 min after inhalation of four puffs of salbutamol (100 µg/puff) through either a primed or a new spacer. The change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after inhaling salbutamol was the primary outcome measure. When the patients used a new spacer, the mean baseline FEV1 (% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) were 89.56±11.95 and 86.17±6.87, respectively. However, the mean increase in FEV1 from the baseline was 10.87±8.99 in this group. On the other hand, with the primed spacer, the respective mean baseline FEV1 and FEV1/FVC values were 89.41±12.14 and 85.49±6.76, while it increased by 12.1±11.01 after salbutamol inhalation. There were no significant differences between the techniques regarding the variation in FEV1 before and after bronchodilator use via a new spacer or primed spacer. Priming new plastic spacers with 20 puffs of salbutamol did not cause additional bronchodilation in asthmatic children, suggesting this practice is inefficient in clinics.

Role of nebulised magnesium sulfate in treating acute asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To review the efficacy of nebulised magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in acute asthma in children. METHODS: The authors searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published until 15 December 2023. RCTs were included if they compared the efficacy and safety of nebulised MgSO4 as a second-line agent in children presenting with acute asthma exacerbation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and the Risk of Bias V.2 tool was used to assess the biases among them. RESULTS: 10 RCTs enrolling 2301 children with acute asthma were included. All trials were placebo controlled and administered nebulised MgSO4/placebo and salbutamol (±ipratropium bromide). There was no significant difference in Composite Asthma Severity Score between the two groups (6 RCTs, 1953 participants; standardised mean difference: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.2 to +0.02, I2=21%). Children in the MgSO4 group have significantly better peak expiratory flow rate (% predicted) than the control group (2 RCTs, 145 participants; mean difference: 19.3; 95% CI: 8.9 to 29.8; I2=0%). There was no difference in the need for hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission or duration of hospital stay. Adverse events were minor, infrequent (7.3%) and similar among the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is low-certainty evidence that nebulised MgSO4 as an add-on second-line therapy for acute asthma in children does not reduce asthma severity or a need for hospitalisation. However, it was associated with slightly better lung functions. The current evidence does not support the routine use of nebulised MgSO4 in paediatric acute asthma management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022373692.