Tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with MET amplification following progression on first-line osimertinib (INSIGHT 2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib have few treatment options. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 2 INSIGHT 2 study evaluating tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, combined with osimertinib in this population. METHODS: This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 179 academic centres and community clinics in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC of any histology, with MET amplification by tissue biopsy fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH; MET gene copy number of ≥5 or MET-to-CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (MET plasma gene copy number of ≥2·3), following progression on first-line osimertinib. Patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg plus oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed objective response in patients with MET amplification by central FISH treated with tepotinib plus osimertinib with at least 9 months of follow-up. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one study drug dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03940703 (enrolment complete). FINDINGS: Between Feb 13, 2020, and Nov 4, 2022, 128 patients (74 [58%] female, 54 [42%] male) were enrolled and initiated tepotinib plus osimertinib. The primary activity analysis population included 98 patients with MET amplification confirmed by central FISH, previous first-line osimertinib and at least 9 months of follow-up (median 12·7 months [IQR 9·9-20·3]). The confirmed objective response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 39·7-60·3; 49 of 98 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral oedema (six [5%] of 128 patients), decreased appetite (five [4%]), prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (five [4%]), and pneumonitis (four [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (13%) patients. Deaths of four (3%) patients were assessed as potentially related to either trial drug by the investigator due to pneumonitis (two [2%] patients), decreased platelet count (one [1%]), respiratory failure (one [1%]), and dyspnoea (one [1%]); one death was attributed to both pneumonitis and dyspnoea. INTERPRETATION: Tepotinib plus osimertinib showed promising activity and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib, suggesting a potential chemotherapy-sparing oral targeted therapy option that should be further investigated. FUNDING: Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945).

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the tislelizumab versus docetaxel for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Background: Tislelizumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor in China to demonstrate superior efficacy in second-line or third-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab compared to docetaxel from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. Methods: A dynamic Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in comparison to docetaxel in second or third-line treatment. The efficacy data utilized in the model were derived from the RATIONALE-303 clinical trial, while cost and utility values were obtained from the drug data service platform and published studies. The primary outcomes of the model encompassed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to validate the robustness of the base case analysis results. Results: The tislelizumab group demonstrated a cost increase of CNY 117,473 and a gain of 0.58 QALYs compared to the docetaxel group, resulting in an ICER value of CNY 202,927 per QALY gained. Conclusion: The administration of tislelizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC not only extends the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, this treatment demonstrates a favorable cost-effectiveness profile across the Chinese population.

The safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer, accounting for a significant proportion of global cancer cases and deaths, poses a considerable health burden. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options due to late-stage diagnosis and drug resistance. Dysregulated of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which is implicated in NSCLC pathogenesis, underscores the potential of MEK inhibitors such as binimetinib. Despite promising results in other cancers, comprehensive studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of binimetinib in lung cancer are lacking. This systematic review aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer treatment. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until September 2023. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of binimetinib for lung cancer treatment were included. Studies were excluded if they included individuals with conditions unrelated to lung cancer, investigated other treatments, or had different types of designs. The quality assessment was conducted utilizing the National Institutes of Health tool. RESULTS: Seven studies with 228 participants overall were included. Four had good quality judgments, and three had fair quality judgments. The majority of patients experienced all-cause adverse events, with diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea being the most commonly reported adverse events of any grade. The objective response rate (ORR) was up to 75%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was up to 9.3 months. The disease control rate after 24 weeks varied from 41% to 64%. Overall survival (OS) ranged between 3.0 and 18.8 months. Notably, treatment-related adverse events were observed in more than 50% of patients, including serious adverse events such as colitis, febrile neutropenia, and pulmonary infection. Some adverse events led to dose limitation and drug discontinuation in five studies. Additionally, five studies reported cases of death, mostly due to disease progression. The median duration of treatment ranged from 14.8 weeks to 8.4 months. The most common dosage of binimetinib was 30 mg or 45 mg twice daily, sometimes used in combination with other agents like encorafenib or hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSIONS: Only a few studies have shown binimetinib to be effective, in terms of improving OS, PFS, and ORR, while most of the studies found nonsignificant efficacy with increased toxicity for binimetinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended.

High red blood cell distribution width attenuates the effectiveness of Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: An exploratory study using a clinical data warehouse.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in cancer treatment but are also associated with adverse events and financial burdens. Identifying accurate biomarkers is crucial for determining which patients are likely to benefit from ICIs. Current markers, such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden, exhibit limited predictive accuracy. This study utilizes a Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) to explore the prognostic significance of novel blood-based factors, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and red cell distribution width (RDW), to enhance the prediction of ICI therapy benefit. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized an exploratory cohort from the CDW that included a variety of cancers to explore factors associated with pembrolizumab treatment duration, validated in a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient cohort from electronic medical records (EMR) and CDW. The CDW contained anonymized data on demographics, diagnoses, medications, and tests for cancer patients treated with ICIs between 2017-2022. Logistic regression identified factors predicting ≤2 or ≥5 pembrolizumab doses as proxies for progression-free survival (PFS), and Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was used to examine their predictive ability. These factors were validated by correlating doses with PFS in the EMR cohort and re-testing their significance in the CDW cohort with other ICIs. This dual approach utilized the CDW for discovery and EMR/CDW cohorts for validating prognostic biomarkers before ICI treatment. RESULTS: A total of 609 cases (428 in the exploratory cohort and 181 in the validation cohort) from CDW and 44 cases from EMR were selected for study. CDW analysis revealed that elevated red cell distribution width (RDW) correlated with receiving ≤2 pembrolizumab doses (p = 0.0008), with an AUC of 0.60 for predicting treatment duration. RDW's correlation with PFS (r = 0.80, p<0.0001) and its weak association with RDW (r = -0.30, p = 0.049) were confirmed in the EMR cohort. RDW also remained significant in predicting short treatment duration across various ICIs (p = 0.0081). This dual methodology verified pretreatment RDW elevation as a prognostic biomarker for shortened ICI therapy. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the utility of CDWs in identifying prognostic biomarkers for ICI therapy in cancer treatment. Elevated RDW before treatment initiation emerged as a potential biomarker of shorter therapy duration.

Clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with uncommon driver gene alterations.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon driver alterations in genes such as ERBB2, BRAF, RET, and MET. This study retrospectively assessed ICI-combination therapy outcomes in this molecular subset of NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed with driver alterations in genes including ERBB2, BRAF, RET or MET, and received ICI combined with chemotherapy (ICI + chemo) and/or targeted therapy (ICI + chemo/TT) as first-line (1L) or second- or third-line (≥ 2L) treatment at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2024. RESULTS: Of the 181 patients included in the study, 131 patients received 1L-ICI + chemo (ERBB2, n = 64; BRAF, n = 34; RET, n = 23; and MET, n = 10), and 50 patients received ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT (ERBB2, n = 16; BRAF, n = 7; RET, n = 14; MET, n = 13). The full cohort had an overall response rate (ORR) of 45.9% and disease control rate of 84.0%. Among patients who received 1L-ICI + chemo, ORR ranged between 51.6% and 60.0%, with the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) of 8.2 and 21.0 months for those with ERBB2-altered tumors, 10.0 and 15.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 12.1 months and OS not reached for RET-altered tumors, and 6.2 and 28.0 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. Additionally, ORR ranged between 14.3% and 30.8% for ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT; mPFS and mOS were 5.4 and 16.2 months for patients with ERBB2-altered tumors, 2.7 and 5.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 6.2 and 14.3 months for RET-altered tumors, and 5.7 and 11.5 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICI-based combination therapies, regardless of treatment line, were effective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver alterations in ERBB2, BRAF, RET, or MET. This suggests their potential as alternative treatment options in this patient population.

Pulsatillic acid as a potential inhibitor of protein kinase C-alpha in non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a global health concern with a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Small molecule inhibitors targeting genetic mutations like EGFR and ALK have shown promise in NSCLC treatment. This study focuses on Protein Kinase C-alpha (PKCα), implicated in NSCLC pathogenesis. Overexpression of PKCα correlates with advanced disease stages. Preclinical studies suggest its inhibition can suppress NSCLC cell growth. The research employs molecular docking to identify Pulsatillic acid (PA) as a potential PKCα inhibitor. ADMET predictions support PA's candidacy and PASS analysis and Swiss Target Prediction reveal its biological properties. Fluorescence-based binding assays demonstrate PA's inhibitory potency on PKCα, aligning with molecular docking findings. Cytotoxicity assays show PA's minimal impact on HEK-293 cell viability, with an IC50 of 21.03 µM in A549 cells. mRNA expression analysis in A549 cells indicates PA's potential inhibitory effect on PKCα. In conclusion, this study highlights that PA may emerge as a promising therapeutic candidate for NSCLC, emphasizing the need for further research, validation, and exploration of its translational potential. The study contributes valuable insights into NSCLC treatment strategies, emphasizing the significance of targeting PKCα.

MiR-3195 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer malignant behaviors along with cisplatin resistance through targeting PFKFB4.

Chemotherapy presents the main therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, cisplatin-based therapy can be limited by drug resistance. MicroRNA (miRNA) possesses a vital regulatory function in modulating the progression as well as cisplatin resistance of NSCLC, but how miR-3195 influences NSCLC is obscure. In this work, it was discovered that miR-3195 presented definite down-regulation in NSCLC cells. Gain-of function assays revealed that overexpressing miR-3195 hindered NSCLC cell proliferation together with migration whereas induced cell apoptosis. Mechanically, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 4 (PFKFB4) presented the target gene of miR-3195 and was high-expressed in NSCLC cells. The repressive impacts of overexpressing miR-3195 on NSCLC cells malignant behaviors were reversed via PFKFB4 elevation. Additionally, elevated miR-3195 expression reduced cisplatin resistance of NSCLC both in vitro as well as in vivo. PFKFB4 elevation could offset the reduced cisplatin resistance caused by miR-3195 overexpression in NSCLC cells. In conclusion, this work clarified miR-3195 repressed NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, as well as cisplatin resistance by modulating PFKFB4. Our study might provide a promising clue to promote the anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy.

Targeted degradation of KRAS protein in non-small cell lung cancer: Therapeutic strategies using liposomal PROTACs with enhanced cellular uptake and pharmacokinetic profiles.

The role of KRAS mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) initiation and progression is well-established. However, "undruggable" KRAS protein poses the research of small molecule inhibitors a significant challenge. Addressing this, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have become a cutting-edge treatment method, emphasizing protein degradation. A modified ethanol injection method was employed in this study to formulate liposomes encapsulating PROTAC drug LC-2 (LC-2 LPs). Precise surface modifications using cell-penetrating peptide R8 yielded R8-LC-2 liposomes (R8-LC-2 LPs). Comprehensive cellular uptake and cytotoxicity studies unveiled that R8-LC-2 LPs depended on concentration and time, showcasing the superior performance of R8-LC-2 LPs compared to normal liposomes. In vivo pharmacokinetic profiles demonstrated the capacity of DSPE-PEG2000 to prolong the circulation time of LC-2, leading to higher plasma concentrations compared to free LC-2. In vivo antitumor efficacy research underscored the remarkable ability of R8-LC-2 LPs to effectively suppress tumor growth. This study contributed to the exploration of enhanced therapeutic strategies for NSCLC, specifically focusing on the development of liposomal PROTACs targeting the "undruggable" KRAS protein. The findings provide valuable insights into the potential of this innovative approach, offering prospects for improved drug delivery and heightened antitumor efficacy.

Immunotherapy and Overall Survival Among Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Obesity.

IMPORTANCE: The association between obesity and response to cancer treatment and survival remains unclear, with conflicting findings from various studies. The optimal choice between conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy for first-line treatment remains uncertain in patients with obesity who potentially have an inadequate therapeutic response to immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) modifies the association of immunotherapy or conventional therapy with overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). DESIGN, SETTING, and PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study, using administrative claims data obtained from advanced treatment centers in Japan, was conducted between December 1, 2015, and January 31, 2023. Participants included individuals aged 18 years or older with aNSCLC who received immunotherapy, using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment or conventional chemotherapy. EXPOSURE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as first-line chemotherapy was compared with conventional chemotherapy, identified through patient medical records. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was overall survival. Survival analysis covered a 3-year follow-up period after the first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 31 257 patients with aNSCLC were identified. Of these, 12 816 patients received ICI therapy (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [9.1] years; 10 287 [80.3%] men) and 18 441 patients received conventional chemotherapy (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [8.9] years; 14 139 [76.7%] men). Among patients with BMI less than 28, ICI therapy was associated with a significantly lower hazard of mortality (eg, BMI 24: hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87) compared with those who underwent conventional chemotherapy. However, no such association was observed among patients with BMI 28 or greater (eg, BMI 28: HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this retrospective cohort study suggest that BMI modifies the association of ICI therapy compared with conventional chemotherapy with overall survival in patients with aNSCLC. A lack of association between ICI therapy and improved survival in patients with aNSCLC and overweight or obesity compared with conventional chemotherapy was observed. This suggests that ICI therapy may not be the optimal first-line therapy for patients with overweight or obesity and the use of conventional chemotherapy should also be considered in such patients.

The impact of the expression level of growth differentiation factor 15 in tumor tissue on the response to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a member of the TGF-ß superfamily, is overexpressed in various cancers and facilitates immune evasion by inhibiting T-cell activation. GDFATHER-TRIAL's phase 2a results demonstrated promising outcomes when combining the GDF-15 neutralizing antibody visugromab (CTL002) with nivolumab, enhancing the response to immunotherapy. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of GDF-15 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor tissues in terms of immunotherapy response. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with nivolumab at Gazi University Hospital between January 2021 and July 2023. GDF-15 expression was evaluated using immunochemistry staining and categorized based on the intensity of cytoplasmic or membranous staining. Samples were divided into a low expression group (scores 0 and 1) and a high expression group (scores 2 and 3). The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), which were analyzed using Kaplan‒Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Objective response rates were assessed in secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, 43 were men (86%), with a median age of 63.9 years. Half of the patients exhibited low GDF-15 expression. High GDF-15 expression correlated with shorter PFS and OS. The median PFS was 7.8 months for the low-expression group versus 4.4 months for the high-expression group (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.83; p = 0.013). The median OS was 18.1 months for the low-expression group compared to 11.8 months for the high-expression group (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.78; p = 0.007). The objective response rate was significantly greater in the low GDF-15 group (52%) than in the high GDF-15 group (24%) (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Elevated GDF-15 expression in NSCLC tumor tissues is associated with poorer response to nivolumab, suggesting that GDF-15 is a potential prognostic biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy. These findings warrant further validation through prospective studies to optimize treatment strategies for NSCLC patients.

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Open Label Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy between Afatinib Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with HAD-B1 for the Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant health challenge globally due to its high mortality. Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has shown superior efficacy over traditional chemotherapy in NSCLC treatment. However, issues like secondary resistance and adverse effects call for alternative therapies. HAD-B1, comprising 4 herbal medicines, has shown promise in lung cancer treatment in both preclinical and clinical settings. This study assesses the combination of HAD-B1 and Afatinib in advanced NSCLC patients to potentially improve outcomes by addressing the limitations of current EGFR-TKI therapies. METHOD: A randomized, open-label trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 with Afatinib in 90 EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients. Participants were divided into treatment and control groups, receiving Afatinib with or without HAD-B1. The study focused on the initial dose maintenance rate and disease control rate (DCR) of Afatinib, alongside secondary outcomes like survival rates and quality of life, under continuous safety monitoring. RESULTS: Among the 90 participants, no significant difference was found in initial dose maintenance (60.98% in the treatment group vs 52.50% in the control, P = .4414) or DCR (80.49% vs 90.00%, P = .2283). Secondary outcomes like PFS, TTP, and OS showed no notable differences. However, physical functioning significantly improved in the treatment group (P = .0475, PPS group). The control group experienced higher rates of adverse events of special interest and adverse drug reactions (P = .01), suggesting HAD-B1 with Afatinib might enhance physical function without increasing adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Combining HAD-B1 with Afatinib potentially improves quality of life and reduces adverse events in advanced NSCLC patients. Further research is necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this combination therapy, aiming to advance NSCLC treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) of the Republic of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr/ (ID: KCT0005414).

Dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory index predict tumor pathological response and survival among patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a multi-cohort retrospective study.

Background: Static tumor features before initiating anti-tumor treatment were insufficient to distinguish responding from non-responding tumors under the selective pressure of immuno-therapy. Herein we investigated the longitudinal dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes (dPBI) and its value in predicting major pathological response (MPR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 147 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed as training cohort, and 26 NSCLC patients from a phase II trial were included as validation cohort. Peripheral blood inflammatory indexes were collected at baseline and as posttreatment status; their dynamics were calculated as their posttreatment values minus their baseline level. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was utilized to screen out predictors for MPR, and a MPR score was integrated. We constructed a model incorporating this MPR score and clinical predictors for predicting MPR and evaluated its predictive capacity via the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves. Furthermore, we sought to interpret this MPR score in the context of micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis in plasma exosomes for 12 paired samples (baseline and posttreatment) obtained from the training cohort. Results: Longitudinal dynamics of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index were screened out as significant indicators for MPR and a MPR score was integrated, which was further identified as an independent predictor of MPR. Then, we constructed a predictive model incorporating MPR score, histology, and differentiated degree, which discriminated MPR and non-MPR patients well in both the training and validation cohorts with an AUC value of 0.803 and 0.817, respectively. Furthermore, micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis revealed the association between our MPR score and immune regulation pathways. A significantly better event-free survival was seen in subpopulations with a high MPR score. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that dPBI reflected responses to neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy for NSCLC. The MPR score, a non-invasive biomarker integrating their dynamics, captured the miRNA transcriptomic pattern in the tumor microenvironment and distinguished MPR from non-MPR for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, which could support the clinical decisions on the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments in NSCLC patients.

Extracellular vesicles miR-574-5p and miR-181a-5p as prognostic markers in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although patient survival is still unsatisfactory. Accurate predictive markers capable of personalizing the treatment of patients with NSCLC are still lacking. Circulating extracellular vesicles involved in cell-to-cell communications through miRNAs (EV-miRs) transfer are promising markers. Plasma from 245 patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab as second-line therapy was collected and analyzed. EV-miRnome was profiled on 174/245 patients by microarray platform, and selected EV-miRs were validated by qPCR. A prognostic model combining EV-miR and clinical variables was built using stepwise Cox regression analysis and tested on an independent patient cohort (71/245). EV-PD-L1 gene copy number was assessed by digital PCR. For 54 patients with disease control, EV-miR changes at best response versus baseline were investigated by microarray and validated by qPCR. EV-miRNome profiling at baseline identified two EV-miRs (miR-181a-5p and miR-574-5p) that, combined with performance status, are capable of discriminating patients unlikely from those that are likely to benefit from immunotherapy (median overall survival of 4 months or higher than 9 months, respectively). EV-PD-L1 digital evaluation reported higher baseline copy number in patients at increased risk of mortality, without improving the prognostic score. Best response EV-miRNome profiling selected six deregulated EV-miRs (miR19a-3p, miR-20a-5p, miR-142-3p, miR-1260a, miR-1260b, and miR-5100) in responding patients. Their longitudinal monitoring highlighted a significant downmodulation already in the first treatment cycles, which lasted more than 6 months. Our results demonstrate that EV-miRs are promising prognostic markers for NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

Combination of pemetrexed with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study.

BACKGROUND: Combining pemetrexed with bevacizumab may have some potential in improving the efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of pemetrexed addition to bevacizumab on treatment efficacy for NSCLC. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of pemetrexed addition to bevacizumab on treatment efficacy in patients with NSCLC. Overall survival and progression-free survival were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with bevacizumab for NSCLC, pemetrexed addition showed significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.99; P = 0.03), survival rate (odd ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.86; P = 0.02), progression-free survival (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.72; P < 0.00001) and progression-free survival rate (OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.38 to 2.67; P < 0.00001), but led to the increase in grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.62 to 2.84; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed addition may be effective to improve treatment efficacy for NSCLC compared to bevacizumab treatment.

Translational modeling-based evidence for enhanced efficacy of standard-of-care drugs in combination with anti-microRNA-155 in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Elevated microRNA-155 (miR-155) expression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) promotes cisplatin resistance and negatively impacts treatment outcomes. However, miR-155 can also boost anti-tumor immunity by suppressing PD-L1 expression. Therapeutic targeting of miR-155 through its antagonist, anti-miR-155, has proven challenging due to its dual molecular effects. METHODS: We developed a multiscale mechanistic model, calibrated with in vivo data and then extrapolated to humans, to investigate the therapeutic effects of nanoparticle-delivered anti-miR-155 in NSCLC, alone or in combination with standard-of-care drugs. RESULTS: Model simulations and analyses of the clinical scenario revealed that monotherapy with anti-miR-155 at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg administered once every three weeks has substantial anti-cancer activity. It led to a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.7 months, which compared favorably to cisplatin and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further, we explored the combinations of anti-miR-155 with standard-of-care drugs, and found strongly synergistic two- and three-drug combinations. A three-drug combination of anti-miR-155, cisplatin, and pembrolizumab resulted in a median PFS of 13.1 months, while a two-drug combination of anti-miR-155 and cisplatin resulted in a median PFS of 11.3 months, which emerged as a more practical option due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness. Our analyses also provided valuable insights into unfavorable dose ratios for drug combinations, highlighting the need for optimizing dose regimens to prevent antagonistic effects. CONCLUSIONS: This work bridges the gap between preclinical development and clinical translation of anti-miR-155 and unravels the potential of anti-miR-155 combination therapies in NSCLC.

Evaluation of the association between predictive factors and the development of immune-related adverse events and prognostic factors for chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Chemoimmunotherapy is widely used as the first-line management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical settings. However, predictive factors associated with the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and prognostic factors for NSCLC patients undergoing chemoimmunotherapy remains largely unexplored. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate predictive factors for irAE development and prognostic factors associated with chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 199 patients with advanced and recurrent NSCLC who underwent chemoimmunotherapy across eight institutions in Nagano prefecture from December 2018 to January 2023. We examined predictive factors associated with irAE development and prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among the patients, 106 experienced irAEs, while 93 patients did not. A total of 44 (22.1%) patients developed multiple irAEs. High serum albumin levels (Alb >3.5 g/dL) emerged as an independent predictive factor associated with irAE development in logistic regression analysis (odds ratio; 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.27-4.34, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the development of multiple irAEs (p = 0.016), lower lactate dehydrogenase level (<223 U/L, p = 0.002), and decreased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (<3, p = 0.049) were identified as independent favorable prognostic factors associated with OS in multivariate Cox hazard analyses. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that high serum Alb is a predictive factor for irAE development and that the presence of multiple irAEs is a favorable prognostic indicator for NSCLC patients undergoing chemoimmunotherapy.

TFEB controls sensitivity to chemotherapy and immuno-killing in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy is affected by the high expression of drug efflux transporters as ABCC1 and by the low expression of ABCA1, mediating the isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP)-dependent anti-tumor activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T-lymphocytes. In endothelial cells ABCA1 is a predicted target of the transcription factor EB (TFEB), but no data exists on the correlation between TFEB and ABC transporters involved in the chemo-immuno-resistance in NSCLC. METHODS: The impact of TFEB/ABCC1/ABCA1 expression on NSCLC patients' survival was analyzed in the TCGA-LUAD cohort and in a retrospective cohort of our institution. Human NSCLC cells silenced for TFEB (shTFEB) were analyzed for ABC transporter expression, chemosensitivity and immuno-killing. The chemo-immuno-sensitizing effects of nanoparticles encapsulating zoledronic acid (NZ) on shTFEB tumors and on tumor immune-microenvironment were evaluated in Hu-CD34+ mice by single-cell RNA-sequencing. RESULTS: TFEBlowABCA1lowABCC1high and TFEBhighABCA1highABCC1low NSCLC patients had the worst and the best prognosis, respectively, in the TCGA-LUAD cohort and in a retrospective cohort of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-line treatment. By silencing shTFEB in NSCLC cells, we demonstrated that TFEB was a transcriptional inducer of ABCA1 and a repressor of ABCC1. shTFEB cells had also a decreased activity of ERK1/2/SREBP2 axis, implying reduced synthesis and efflux via ABCA1 of cholesterol and its intermediate IPP. Moreover, TFEB silencing reduced cholesterol incorporation in mitochondria: this event increased the efficiency of OXPHOS and the fueling of ABCC1 by mitochondrial ATP. Accordingly, shTFEB cells were less immuno-killed by the Vγ9Vδ2 T-lymphocytes activated by IPP and more resistant to cisplatin. NZ, which increased IPP efflux but not OXPHOS and ATP production, sensitized shTFEB immuno-xenografts, by reducing intratumor proliferation and increasing apoptosis in response to cisplatin, and by increasing the variety of anti-tumor infiltrating cells (Vγ9Vδ2 T-lymphocytes, CD8+T-lymphocytes, NK cells). CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that TFEB is a gatekeeper of the sensitivity to chemotherapy and immuno-killing in NSCLC, and that the TFEBlowABCA1lowABCC1high phenotype can be predictive of poor response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. By reshaping both cancer metabolism and tumor immune-microenvironment, zoledronic acid can re-sensitize TFEBlow NSCLCs, highly resistant to chemo- and immunotherapy.

[Progress of IL-21 and Tfh Mediated Immunotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prevalent and aggressive global malignancy. Conventional surgical treatments, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies often fall short in halting disease progression due to inherent limitations, resulting in suboptimal prognosis. Despite the advent of immunotherapy drugs offering new hope for NSCLC treatment, current efficacy remains insufficient to meet all patient needs. Therefore, actively exploring novel immunotherapeutic approaches to further reduce mortality rates in NSCLC patients has become a crucial focus of NSCLC research. This article aims to systematically review the anti-tumor effects of interleukin-21 and follicular helper T cells in NSCLC immunotherapy by summarizing and analyzing relevant literatures from both domestic and international sources, as well as exploring the potential for enhancing NSCLC treatment prospects through immune checkpoint regulation via immunotherapeutic means.
.

Binary classification of copy number alteration profiles in liquid biopsy with potential clinical impact in advanced NSCLC.

Liquid biopsy has recently emerged as an important tool in clinical practice particularly for lung cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated cell-free DNA analyses performed at our Institution by next generation sequencing methodology detecting the major classes of genetic alterations. Starting from the graphical representation of chromosomal alterations provided by the analysis software, we developed a support vector machine classifier to automatically classify chromosomal profiles as stable (SCP) or unstable (UCP). High concordance was found between our binary classification and tumor fraction evaluation performed using shallow whole genome sequencing. Among clinical features, UCP patients were more likely to have ≥ 3 metastatic sites and liver metastases. Longitudinal assessment of chromosomal profiles in 33 patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed that only patients that experienced early death or hyperprogressive disease retained or acquired an UCP within 3 weeks from the beginning of ICIs. UCP was not observed following ICIs among patients that experienced progressive disease or clinical benefit. In conclusion, our binary classification, applied to whole copy number alteration profiles, could be useful for clinical risk stratification during systemic treatment for non-small cell lung cancer patients.