Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 144
Filtrer
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(16): e020528, 2021 08 17.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34387132

RÉSUMÉ

Background Evidence suggests intracerebral hemorrhage survivors have earlier recovery compared with ischemic stroke survivors. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services prospective payment system instituted documentation rules for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in 2010, with the goal of optimizing patient selection. We investigated whether these requirements limited IRF and increased skilled nursing facility (SNF) use compared with home discharge. Methods and Results Intracerebral hemorrhage discharges to IRF, SNF, or home were estimated using GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) Stroke registry data between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015 (n=265 444). Binary hierarchical models determined associations between the 2010 Rule and discharge setting; subgroup analyses evaluated age, geographic region, and hospital type. From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009, 45.5% of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage had home discharge, 22.2% went to SNF, and 32.3% went to IRF. After January 1, 2010, there was a 1.06% absolute increase in home discharge, a 0.46% increase in SNF, and a 1.52% decline in IRF. The adjusted odds of IRF versus home discharge decreased 3% after 2010 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00). Lower odds of IRF versus home discharge were observed in people aged <65 years (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96), Western states (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95), and nonteaching hospitals (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95). Adjusted odds of SNF versus home discharge increased 14% after 2010 (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18); there were significant associations in all age groups, the Northeast, the South, the Midwest, and teaching hospitals. Conclusions The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2010 IRF prospective payment system Rule resulted in fewer discharges to IRF and more discharges to SNF in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Health policy changes potentially affect access to intensive postacute rehabilitation.


Sujet(s)
Hémorragie cérébrale/rééducation et réadaptation , Réforme des soins de santé , Medicare (USA) , Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé/tendances , Sortie du patient/tendances , Système de paiements préétablis , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/tendances , Établissements de soins qualifiés/tendances , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Réforme des soins de santé/économie , Réforme des soins de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Accessibilité des services de santé/tendances , Humains , Patients hospitalisés , Mâle , Medicare (USA)/économie , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Adulte d'âge moyen , Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé/économie , Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Sortie du patient/économie , Sortie du patient/législation et jurisprudence , Processus politique , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Enregistrements , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Établissements de soins qualifiés/économie , Établissements de soins qualifiés/législation et jurisprudence , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique , États-Unis
2.
Fed Regist ; 83(151): 38514-73, 2018 Aug 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080343

RÉSUMÉ

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2019. As required by the Social Security Act (the Act), this final rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2019. This final rule also alleviates administrative burden for IRFs by removing the Functional Independence Measure (FIM\TM\) instrument and associated Function Modifiers from the IRF Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) beginning in FY 2020 and revises certain IRF coverage requirements to reduce the amount of required paperwork in the IRF setting beginning in FY 2019. Additionally, this final rule incorporates certain data items located in the Quality Indicators section of the IRF-PAI into the IRF case-mix classification system using analysis of 2 years of data beginning in FY 2020. For the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), this final rule adopts a new measure removal factor, removes two measures from the IRF QRP measure set, and codifies a number of program requirements in our regulations.


Sujet(s)
Medicare (USA)/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Groupes homogènes de malades/économie , Groupes homogènes de malades/législation et jurisprudence , Humains , Patients hospitalisés , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Indicateurs qualité santé/économie , Indicateurs qualité santé/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
3.
Rehabil Nurs ; 43(1): 3-11, 2018.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27350594

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to identify interventions to capture admission functional independence measure (FIM®) ratings on the day of admission to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. DESIGN: A quantitative evidence-based practice quality improvement study utilizing descriptive statistics. METHODS: Admission FIM® ratings from patients discharged in June 2012 (retrospective review) were compared to admission FIM® ratings from patients discharged in June 2014 (prospective review). The logic model was utilized to determine the project inputs, outputs, and outcomes. FINDINGS: Interventions to capture admission FIM® ratings on the day of admission are essential to accurately predict the patient's burden of care, length of stay, and reimbursement. Waiting until Day 2 or Day 3 after admission to capture the admission FIM® assessment resulted in inflated admission FIM® ratings and suboptimal quality outcomes. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Interventions to capture admission FIM® ratings on the day of admission were successful at improving the quality of care, length of stay efficiency, and accurately recording admission FIM® ratings to determine the patient's burden of care.


Sujet(s)
Acuité des besoins du patient , Admission du patient/tendances , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/normes , Soins infirmiers en rééducation-réadaptation/méthodes , Sujet âgé , /organisation et administration , /tendances , Femelle , Hawaï , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Évaluation des besoins en soins infirmiers/méthodes , Évaluation des besoins en soins infirmiers/tendances , Admission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Amélioration de la qualité/statistiques et données numériques , Amélioration de la qualité/tendances , Récupération fonctionnelle , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/statistiques et données numériques , Soins infirmiers en rééducation-réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Soins infirmiers en rééducation-réadaptation/statistiques et données numériques , Études rétrospectives , États-Unis
4.
Am J Occup Ther ; 72(1): 7201090010p1-7201090010p6, 2018.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29280708

RÉSUMÉ

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has scrutinized the provision of rehabilitation services in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for some time. Little research guidance exists on appropriate dosage or rehabilitation intensity (RI) among SNF patients or patients in other postacute care (PAC) settings. CMS developed a PAC assessment, the Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation (CARE) Tool, in response to questions about what issues drive placement in various PAC settings under Medicare. The ability to adequately assess functional outcomes and correlate them to the RI provided by using the CARE Tool is promising. However, further research, policy advocacy, and practice analysis must be undertaken to promote and protect adequate access to occupational therapy and physical therapy in SNFs and other PAC settings. Individual practitioners must participate in data gathering to ensure that the data for analysis are fully informed by the occupational therapy perspective.


Sujet(s)
Référenciation , Politique de santé , Récupération fonctionnelle , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/normes , Établissements de soins qualifiés/normes , Humains , Medicare (USA) , Ergothérapie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Établissements de soins qualifiés/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
5.
Fed Regist ; 82(148): 36238-305, 2017 Aug 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805358

RÉSUMÉ

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2018 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (IRF PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2018. This final rule also revises the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes that are used to determine presumptive compliance under the "60 percent rule," removes the 25 percent payment penalty for inpatient rehabilitation facility patient assessment instrument (IRF-PAI) late transmissions, removes the voluntary swallowing status item (Item 27) from the IRF-PAI, summarizes comments regarding the criteria used to classify facilities for payment under the IRF PPS, provides for a subregulatory process for certain annual updates to the presumptive methodology diagnosis code lists, adopts the use of height/weight items on the IRF-PAI to determine patient body mass index (BMI) greater than 50 for cases of single-joint replacement under the presumptive methodology, and revises and updates measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP).


Sujet(s)
Medicare (USA)/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Réadaptation/économie , Réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Humains , Patients hospitalisés , États-Unis
6.
Rev Neurol ; 64(s03): S9-S12, 2017 May 17.
Article de Espagnol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28524212

RÉSUMÉ

We report on the experience of a family in which the youngest child has acquired brain injury and the struggle undertaken by the family to improve the neurorehabilitation resources in the public health service. The article outlines the main demands, from the socio-familial point of view, as regards the improvement of neurological rehabilitation and the resources needed to deliver it.


TITLE: Daño cerebral sobrevenido infantil, una experiencia personal. Reclamaciones desde el punto de vista sociofamiliar.Se describe la experiencia de una familia en la que el hijo menor tiene daño cerebral sobrevenido y la lucha emprendida por la familia para mejorar los recursos neurorrehabilitadores de la sanidad publica. Se recogen las principales reclamaciones, desde el punto de vista sociofamiliar, en cuanto a la mejora en la atencion neurorrehabilitadora y los recursos necesarios.


Sujet(s)
Souffrance cérébrale chronique , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale , Services de santé pour les personnes handicapées/législation et jurisprudence , Réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Chutes accidentelles , Souffrance cérébrale chronique/économie , Souffrance cérébrale chronique/étiologie , Souffrance cérébrale chronique/psychologie , Souffrance cérébrale chronique/rééducation et réadaptation , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/complications , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/économie , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/psychologie , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/rééducation et réadaptation , Aidants/psychologie , Enfant , Fractures multiples/étiologie , Fractures multiples/rééducation et réadaptation , Accessibilité des services de santé , Besoins et demandes de services de santé , Services de santé pour les personnes handicapées/économie , Services de santé pour les personnes handicapées/organisation et administration , Disparités d'accès aux soins , Hôpitaux privés/économie , Humains , Pressions , Mâle , Programmes nationaux de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Droits des patients/législation et jurisprudence , État végétatif persistant , Réadaptation/méthodes , Réadaptation/organisation et administration , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/organisation et administration , Espagne
7.
Mil Med ; 181(S4): 3-12, 2016 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27849455

RÉSUMÉ

Congress authorized creation of the Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence (EACE) as part of the 2009 National Defense Authorization Act. The legislation mandated the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to implement a comprehensive plan and strategy for the mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries and amputation. The EACE also was tasked with conducting clinically relevant research, fostering collaborations, and building partnerships across multidisciplinary international, federal, and academic networks to optimize the quality of life of service members and veterans who have sustained extremity trauma or amputations. To fulfill the mandate to conduct research, the EACE developed a Research and Surveillance Division that complements and collaborates with outstanding DoD, VA, and academic research programs across the globe. The EACE researchers have efforts in four key research focus areas relevant to extremity trauma and amputation: (1) Novel Rehabilitation Interventions, (2) Advanced Prosthetic and Orthotic Technologies, (3) Epidemiology and Surveillance, and (4) Medical and Surgical Innovations. This overview describes the EACE efforts to innovate, discover, and translate knowledge gleaned from collaborative research partnerships into clinical practice and policy.


Sujet(s)
Amputation chirurgicale/rééducation et réadaptation , Membres/traumatismes , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/organisation et administration , Humains , Surveillance de la population/méthodes , Prothèses et implants/tendances , Qualité de vie/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Recherche/organisation et administration , États-Unis , Department of Defense (USA)/organisation et administration , Department of Veterans Affairs (USA)/organisation et administration
8.
Fed Regist ; 81(151): 52055-141, 2016 Aug 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27529901

RÉSUMÉ

This final rule will update the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2017 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Act, this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (IRF PPS's) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2017. This final rule also revises and updates quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP).


Sujet(s)
Medicare (USA)/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Humains , Patients hospitalisés , Durée du séjour/économie , Durée du séjour/législation et jurisprudence , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Ajustement du risque/économie , Ajustement du risque/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
11.
Schmerz ; 29(6): 641-8, 2015 Dec.
Article de Allemand | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26452370

RÉSUMÉ

Multimodal pain treatment programs are widely accepted as the medical treatment standard in the management of patients with chronic pain syndromes. The concepts and treatment strategies are based on the biopsychosocial model of pain and programs for early restoration of function. Although this concept is primarily implemented in the curative field, i.e. in hospitals for the treatment of patients with chronic pain diseases, modified programs based on the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) can now also be found in rehabilitation clinics. Despite the assumed similarities, significant differences in, for example the aims of the therapy and relevant structural and process variables have to be kept in mind when allocating patients to a program as provided by a hospital or a rehabilitation clinic. The aim of this article is to present the framework structures of both treatment levels with respect to the implementation of multimodal pain therapy programs and to elucidate the differential diagnostic approach to the indications.


Sujet(s)
Douleur chronique/rééducation et réadaptation , Association thérapeutique/méthodes , Gestion de la douleur/méthodes , Admission du patient , Douleur chronique/classification , Douleur chronique/étiologie , Évaluation de l'invalidité , Médecine factuelle , Allemagne , Adhésion aux directives , Recherche sur les services de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Hospitalisation/législation et jurisprudence , Humains , Communication interdisciplinaire , Collaboration intersectorielle , Programmes nationaux de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Mesure de la douleur , Admission du patient/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence
12.
Fed Regist ; 80(151): 47035-139, 2015 Aug 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26248390

RÉSUMÉ

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2016 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Act, this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF PPS's case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2016. This final rule also finalizes policy changes, including the adoption of an IRF-specific market basket that reflects the cost structures of only IRF providers, a 1-year phase-in of the revised wage index changes, a 3-year phase-out of the rural adjustment for certain IRFs, and revisions and updates to the quality reporting program (QRP).


Sujet(s)
Medicare (USA)/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Réadaptation/économie , Réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Humains , Patients hospitalisés/législation et jurisprudence , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Indicateurs qualité santé/législation et jurisprudence , Révision et fixation des tarifs/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
14.
Dan Med J ; 62(5)2015 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050828

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is a known sequela after head and neck cancer (HNC) and causes malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia and a reduced quality of life. Due to improved survival rates, the number of patients with sequelae is increasing. Evidence on the ideal HNC-specific rehabilitation of dysphagia is lacking, but several studies indicate that early initiation is crucial. The aim of this study was to map the existing dysphagia rehabilitation programmes for HNC patients in Denmark. METHODS: Occupational therapists (OTs), oncologists and surgeons from five hospitals participated in a nationwide questionnaire-based survey, along with OTs from 39 municipal health centres. RESULTS: HNC patients rarely receive preventive occupational therapy before treatment, and hospital-based OTs mainly attend to HNC patients undergoing surgery. Far from all oncology and surgical departments complete the required rehabilitation plans upon discharge which leaves many patients untreated. There are vast differences between the municipalities' rehabilitation programmes and between the expertise employed in municipalities and hospitals. CONCLUSION: Existing HNC rehabilitation does not meet official Danish guidelines. Only a fraction of HNC patients are offered rehabilitation and often long after completing treatment. Municipal rehabilitation services vary considerably in terms of type, duration, intensity and expertise. Dysphagia-related rehabilitation requires an improved monitoration, possibly with an increase in the uptake of centralised dysphagia rehabilitation. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.


Sujet(s)
Troubles de la déglutition/rééducation et réadaptation , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/rééducation et réadaptation , Directives de santé publique , Ergothérapie/normes , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/normes , Villes , Troubles de la déglutition/étiologie , Danemark , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/complications , Humains , Oncologie médicale/législation et jurisprudence , Oncologie médicale/normes , Ergothérapie/législation et jurisprudence , Qualité de vie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Enquêtes et questionnaires
15.
Fed Regist ; 78(151): 47859-934, 2013 Aug 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23923144

RÉSUMÉ

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2014 (for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2013 and on or before September 30, 2014) as required by the statute. This final rule also revised the list of diagnosis codes that may be counted toward an IRF's "60 percent rule'' compliance calculation to determine "presumptive compliance,'' update the IRF facility-level adjustment factors using an enhanced estimation methodology, revise sections of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, revise requirements for acute care hospitals that have IRF units, clarify the IRF regulation text regarding limitation of review, update references to previously changed sections in the regulations text, and revise and update quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program.


Sujet(s)
Medicare (USA)/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Réadaptation/économie , Groupes homogènes de malades/économie , Groupes homogènes de malades/législation et jurisprudence , Régimes de rémunération à l'acte/économie , Régimes de rémunération à l'acte/législation et jurisprudence , Humains , Patients hospitalisés , Classification internationale des maladies/économie , Classification internationale des maladies/législation et jurisprudence , Durée du séjour/économie , Durée du séjour/législation et jurisprudence , Déclaration obligatoire , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (USA) , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Indicateurs qualité santé/économie , Indicateurs qualité santé/législation et jurisprudence , Réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
16.
Health Serv Res ; 48(5): 1557-80, 2013 Oct.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23557215

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To understand the impacts of Medicare payment reform on the entry and exit of post-acute providers. DATA SOURCES: Medicare Provider of Services data, Cost Reports, and Census data from 1991 through 2010. STUDY DESIGN: We examined market-level changes in entry and exit after payment reforms relative to a preexisting time trend. We also compared changes in high Medicare share markets relative to lower Medicare share markets and for freestanding relative to hospital-based facilities. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We calculated market-level entry, exit, and total stock of home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, and inpatient rehabilitation facilities from Provider of Services files between 1992 and 2010. We linked these measures with demographic information from the Census and American Community Survey, information on Certificate of Need laws, and Medicare share of facilities in each market drawn from Cost Report data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Payment reforms reducing average and marginal payments reduced entries and increased exits from the market. Entry effects were larger and more persistent than exit effects. Entry and exit rates fluctuated more for home health agencies than skilled nursing facilities. Effects on number of providers were consistent with entry and exit effects. CONCLUSIONS: Payment reform affects market entry and exit, which in turn may affect market structure, access to care, quality and cost of care, and patient outcomes. Policy makers should consider potential impacts of payment reforms on post-acute care market structure when implementing these reforms.


Sujet(s)
Réforme des soins de santé/économie , Réforme des soins de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Medicare (USA)/économie , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (USA) , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Politique de santé , Organismes de prise en charge à domicile/économie , Organismes de prise en charge à domicile/législation et jurisprudence , Humains , Commission consultative indépendante MEDPAC (USA) , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Mécanismes de remboursement/économie , Mécanismes de remboursement/législation et jurisprudence , Établissements de soins qualifiés/économie , Établissements de soins qualifiés/législation et jurisprudence , Soins de suite/économie , États-Unis
17.
Fed Regist ; 77(221): 68209-565, 2012 Nov 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23155551

RÉSUMÉ

This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2013 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Quality Reporting Program. We are continuing the electronic reporting pilot for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, and revising the various regulations governing Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), including the secure transmittal of electronic medical information, beneficiary complaint resolution and notification processes, and technical changes. The technical changes to the QIO regulations reflect CMS' commitment to the general principles of the President's Executive Order on Regulatory Reform, Executive Order 13563 (January 18, 2011).


Sujet(s)
Soins ambulatoires/économie , Dossiers médicaux électroniques/législation et jurisprudence , Medicare (USA)/économie , Services de consultations externes des hôpitaux/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Assurance de la qualité des soins de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Indicateurs qualité santé/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Dispensaires de petite chirurgie/économie , Soins ambulatoires/législation et jurisprudence , Current procedural terminology (USA) , Healthcare common procedure coding system (USA) , Humains , Medicare (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Services de consultations externes des hôpitaux/législation et jurisprudence , Projets pilotes , Soins de santé primaires/économie , Soins de santé primaires/législation et jurisprudence , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Échelles de valeur relative , Dispensaires de petite chirurgie/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
18.
Fed Regist ; 77(222): 68891-9373, 2012 Nov 16.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23155552

RÉSUMÉ

This major final rule with comment period addresses changes to the physician fee schedule, payments for Part B drugs, and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services. It also implements provisions of the Affordable Care Act by establishing a face-to-face encounter as a condition of payment for certain durable medical equipment (DME) items. In addition, it implements statutory changes regarding the termination of non-random prepayment review. This final rule with comment period also includes a discussion in the Supplementary Information regarding various programs . (See the Table of Contents for a listing of the specific issues addressed in this final rule with comment period.)


Sujet(s)
Soins ambulatoires/économie , Matériel médical durable/économie , Dossiers médicaux électroniques/législation et jurisprudence , Medicare part B (USA)/économie , Services de consultations externes des hôpitaux/économie , Système de paiements préétablis/économie , Assurance de la qualité des soins de santé/législation et jurisprudence , Indicateurs qualité santé/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/économie , Dispensaires de petite chirurgie/économie , Soins ambulatoires/législation et jurisprudence , Current procedural terminology (USA) , Healthcare common procedure coding system (USA) , Humains , Medicare part B (USA)/législation et jurisprudence , Services de consultations externes des hôpitaux/législation et jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (USA) , Projets pilotes , Soins de santé primaires/économie , Soins de santé primaires/législation et jurisprudence , Système de paiements préétablis/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Échelles de valeur relative , Dispensaires de petite chirurgie/législation et jurisprudence , États-Unis
19.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ; 56(4): 539-56, 2012 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21518702

RÉSUMÉ

To explore the effectiveness of court-supervised drug treatment for California parolees, offender characteristics, treatment experiences, and outcomes were examined and contrasted to those of probationers. The analysis used statewide administrative data on 4,507 parolees and 22,701 probationers referred to treatment by Proposition 36 during fiscal year 2006-2007. Compared with probationers, parolee problems were more severe at treatment entry, more were treated in residential settings, treatment retention was shorter, and fewer completed treatment. Regarding outcomes, fewer parolees were successful at treatment discharge and more recidivated over 12-months post admission. Both groups improved in many areas by treatment discharge, but improvements were generally smaller among parolees. Significant interaction effects indicated that parolees benefited from residential care and more treatment days, even after controlling for covariates. Court-supervised drug treatment for parolees can "work;" however, parolees have more frequent and diverse needs, and their outcomes are enhanced by more intensive treatment. Findings suggest methods for optimizing the effectiveness of criminal-justice-supervised programs for treating drug-dependent offenders.


Sujet(s)
Prisonniers/législation et jurisprudence , Prisonniers/psychologie , Orientation vers un spécialiste/législation et jurisprudence , Troubles liés à une substance/rééducation et réadaptation , Adulte , Californie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Abandon des soins par les patients/législation et jurisprudence , Abandon des soins par les patients/psychologie , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Prévention secondaire , Troubles liés à une substance/prévention et contrôle , Troubles liés à une substance/psychologie , Résultat thérapeutique
20.
Med Tr Prom Ekol ; (8): 1-5, 2011.
Article de Russe | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22180968

RÉSUMÉ

The study based on Rehabilitation Center No 2 in Rostov region covered 100 male patients with dust obstructive bronchitis. The authors considered organisational and legal problems of medical rehabilitation for patients with occupational diseases caused by dust. The authors also specified and suggested stages of individual medical rehabilitation and efficiency criteria for rehabilitation, exeplified by dust obstructive bronchitis patients. Data show that creation and accomplishment of individual medical rehabilitation programs for dust obstructive bronchitis patients enable to optimize rehabilitation process, provide continuity of medical rehabilitation, evaluate efficiency of rehabilitation measures on each step of medical rehabilitation. Higher efficiency of rehabilitation is achieved by individual rehabilitation added by nebulizer treatment, efferent therapy, psychologic correction and specialized education for chronic patients with obstructive lung diseases.


Sujet(s)
Polluants atmosphériques d'origine professionnelle/toxicité , Bronchite/rééducation et réadaptation , Poussière , Maladies professionnelles/rééducation et réadaptation , Santé au travail/législation et jurisprudence , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/organisation et administration , Bronchite/étiologie , Réglementation gouvernementale , Humains , Mâle , Maladies professionnelles/étiologie , Évaluation de programme , Qualité des soins de santé , Réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Réadaptation/organisation et administration , Réadaptation/normes , Centres de rééducation et de réadaptation/législation et jurisprudence , Russie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...