RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Incident reporting systems (IRS) can improve care quality and patient safety, yet their impact is limited by clinician engagement. Our objective was to assess barriers to reporting in a hospital-wide IRS and use data to inform ongoing improvement of a specialty-specific IRS embedded in the electronic health record targeting anaesthesiologists. METHODS: This quality improvement (QI) evaluation used mixed methods, including qualitative interviews, faculty surveys and user data from the specialty-specific IRS. We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews from January to May 2023 in a large academic health system in Northern California. Participants included adult and paediatric anaesthesiologists, operating room nurses, surgeons and QI operators, recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. We identified key themes and factors influencing engagement, which were classified using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework. We surveyed hospital anaesthesiologists in January and May 2023, and characterised the quantity and type of reports submitted to the new system. RESULTS: Participants shared organisation and technology-related barriers to engagement in traditional system-wide IRSs, many of which the specialty-specific IRS addressed-specifically those related to technological access to the system. Barriers related to building psychological safety for those who report remain. Survey results showed that most barriers to reporting improved following the specialty-specific IRS launch, but limited time remained an ongoing barrier (25 respondents out of 44, 56.8%). A total of 964 reports with quality/safety concerns were submitted over the first 8 months of implementation; 47-76 unique anaesthesiologists engaged per month. The top safety quality categories of concern were equipment and technology (25.9%), clinical complications (25.3%) and communication and scheduling (19.9%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a specialty-specific IRS can facilitate increased physician engagement in quality and safety reporting and complement existing system-wide IRSs.
Sujet(s)
Sécurité des patients , Amélioration de la qualité , Humains , Sécurité des patients/normes , Sécurité des patients/statistiques et données numériques , Californie , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administration , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , Gestion du risque/méthodes , Gestion du risque/statistiques et données numériques , Gestion du risque/normes , Médecins/statistiques et données numériques , Médecins/psychologie , Médecins/normes , Recherche qualitative , Entretiens comme sujet/méthodes , Mâle , Adulte ,RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Patients who require emergency general surgery (EGS) are at a substantially higher risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality than patients undergoing elective general surgery. The acute care surgery (ACS) model has been shown to improve EGS patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. A recent systematic review has shown extensive heterogeneity in the structure of ACS models worldwide. The objective of this study was to describe the current landscape of ACS models in academic centres across Canada. METHODS: We sent an online questionnaire to the 18 academic centres in Canada. The lead ACS physicians from each institution completed the questionnaire, describing the structure of their ACS models. RESULTS: In total, 16 institutions responded, all of which reported having ACS models, with a total of 29 ACS services described. All services had resident coverage. Of the 29, 18 (62%) had dedicated allied health care staff. The staff surgeon was free from elective duties while covering ACS in 17/29 (59%) services. More than half (15/29; 52%) of the services described protected ACS operating room time, but only 7/15 (47%) had a dedicated ACS room all 5 weekdays. Four of 29 services (14%) had no protected ACS operating room time. Only 1/16 (6%) institutions reported a mandate to conduct ACS research, while 12/16 (75%) found ACS research difficult, owing to lack of resources. CONCLUSION: We saw large variations in the structure of ACS models in academic centres in Canada. The components of ACS models that are most important to patient outcomes remain poorly defined. Future research will focus on defining the necessary cornerstones of ACS models.
Sujet(s)
Centres hospitaliers universitaires , , Humains , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administration , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , /organisation et administration , /statistiques et données numériques , Canada , Soins de réanimation/statistiques et données numériques , Soins de réanimation/organisation et administration , Chirurgie générale/statistiques et données numériques , Modèles d'organisation , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: In the last two decades, academic medical centers in the United States have faced a new challenge, dealing with breaches of medical professionalism in their staff, house staff, and medical students. Medical education settings have largely directed their professionalism efforts toward responding reactively to negative outliers. DISCUSSION: This paper contends that the warrant of medical education mandates a transformative path forward. While negative behavior must be responded to meaningfully, so, too, must positive role models of professional behavior be publicly lauded for their consequential culture change in their institutions, and promoted as positive role models. Further, the promotion of medical professionalism must be part of this culture by proactively engaging all learners and health care providers with medical ethics and humanities-based knowledge, critical thinking skills, and role modeling. CONCLUSION: Professionalism programs should be vested with the authority to implement an affirmative educational program intended to nurture and promote medical professionalism in each medical student, resident, fellow, and attending and utilize methods to that end employing both virtue and care ethics.
Medical professionalism is the foundational concept grounded upon scientific- and humanities-based knowledge and skills, directed toward the promotion of patient benefit with the rejection of self-interest, delivered with excellence in comportment, and the adherence to a covenant of trust with society.Medical educators who solely emphasize the detection and punishment of negative outliers are missing essential elements in promoting medical professionalism.Medical professionalism should be comprehensively addressed through a systematic addressing of teaching fundamental knowledge, skills, and virtue, promote excellence in role modeling and mentorship, and the redress of those lacking insight in their professional conduct.
Sujet(s)
Sciences humaines , Professionnalisme , Professionnalisme/éthique , Sciences humaines/enseignement et éducation , Humains , États-Unis , Déontologie médicale , Enseignement médical/éthique , Programme d'études , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/éthique , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administration , Étudiant médecine/psychologieRÉSUMÉ
Prior research highlights that rural populations have been historically underrepresented/excluded from clinical research. The primary objective of this study was to describe the inclusion of rural populations within our research enterprise using Clinical Research Management System demographic information at a large academic medical center in the Southeast. This was a cross-sectional study using participant demographic information for all protocols entered into our Clinical Research Management System between May 2018 and March 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the representation of rural and non-rural participants and demographic breakdown by age, sex, race, and ethnicity for our entire enterprise and at the state level. We also compared Material Community Deprivation Index levels between urban and rural participants. Results indicated that 19% of the research population was classified as rural and 81% as non-rural for our entire sample, and 17.5% rural and 82.5% urban for our state-level sample. There were significant differences in race, sex, and age between rural and non-rural participants and Material Community Deprivation Indices between rural and non-rural participants. Lessons learned and recommendations for increasing the inclusion of rural populations in research are discussed.
Sujet(s)
Équité en santé , Population rurale , Humains , Population rurale/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Études transversales , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Sélection de patients , Sujet âgé , Recherche biomédicale/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Population urbaine/statistiques et données numériques , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administrationRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Direct primary care (DPC) critics are concerned that the periodic fee precludes participation from vulnerable populations. The purpose is to describe the demographics and appointments of a, now closed, academic DPC clinic and determine whether there are differences in vulnerability between census tracts with and without any clinic patients. METHODS: We linked geocoded data from the DPC's electronic health record with the social vulnerability index (SVI). To characterize users, we described their age, sex, language, membership, diagnoses, and appointments. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions or medians, and interquartile ranges. To determine differences in SVI, we calculated a localized SVI percentile within Harris County. A t test assuming equal variances and Mann-Whitney U Tests were used to assess differences in SVI and all other census variables, respectively, between those tracts with and without any clinic patients. RESULTS: We included 322 patients and 772 appointments. Patients were seen an average of 2.4 times and were predominantly female (58.4%). More than a third (37.3%) spoke Spanish. There was a mean of 3.68 ICD-10 codes per patient. Census tracts in which DPC patients lived had significantly higher SVI scores (ie, more vulnerable) than tracts where no DPC clinic patients resided (median, 0.60 vs 0.47, p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This academic DPC clinic cared for individuals living in vulnerable census tracts relative to those tracts without any clinic patients. The clinic, unfortunately, closed due to multiple obstacles. Nevertheless, this finding counters the perception that DPC clinics primarily draw from affluent neighborhoods.
Sujet(s)
Soins de santé primaires , Populations vulnérables , Humains , Femelle , Soins de santé primaires/statistiques et données numériques , Soins de santé primaires/organisation et administration , Populations vulnérables/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Jeune adulte , Adolescent , Dossiers médicaux électroniques/statistiques et données numériques , Établissements de soins ambulatoires/statistiques et données numériques , Établissements de soins ambulatoires/organisation et administration , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , Accessibilité des services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Rendez-vous et planningsRÉSUMÉ
Academic medicine continues to characterize the experiences of Black and other minoritized faculty in medicine to enhance their careers and promote their advancement. An issue of discussion is tenure and its role in the advancement and retention of this group. Tenure is a sign of national presence, command of an area of study, and can demonstrate support from the institution in terms of permanent employment, eligibility to apply for awards, sit or vote on certain committees or qualify for certain leadership opportunities. Anecdotally there have been reports that tenure is a thing of the past that has lost relevance prompting some to end tenure in their institutions. Reasons for this are complex, however the literature does not include minoritized faculty as a reason for the need to revise or eliminate tenure and tenure earning tracks. The authors discuss 3 reasons why Black and other minoritized faculty should be afforded the opportunity to achieve permanent status in their academic health centers. They include histories of being denied freedom, having information concealed or being giving false information, and being denied permanent academic employment status.
Sujet(s)
Mobilité de carrière , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecine , Humains , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecine/statistiques et données numériques , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administration , /statistiques et données numériques , États-Unis , Emploi , Racisme/prévention et contrôleRÉSUMÉ
Acute transfusion reaction is mainly related to the infusion of blood or blood products resulting at any time within a day of the intervention. It ranges from a non-specific febrile episode to a life-threatening intravascular hemolysis. The severity of the reaction and the degree of morbidity are usually related to the degree of ABO incompatibility and the volume of blood transfused. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence of acute transfusion reactions and its associated factors in Jimma University Medical Center, southwest Ethiopia. Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 October to December 30, 2020. A total of 384 transfused patients were followed in this study. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected through a structured questionnaire. Baseline measurement and 24-hour periodic vital signs monitoring were conducted after each transfusion. Four milliliters of venous blood were drawn after transfusion intervention from each distrusted patient for complete blood count, blood group phenotype, direct antihuman globulin test (DAT), and crossmatching. Data were entered into Epi data version 3.1 and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science software (SPSS) version 20. Descriptive statistics, and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were employed to test the association between independent and dependent variables. A P valueâ ≤â .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Acute transfusion reactions were diagnosed in 5.7% of patients, with most of these reactions were febrile nonhemolytic reactions (63.6%) followed by allergic (36.4%) reactions with mild clinical manifestations (27.3%). Transfusion history, transfused blood that was kept for more than 13 days, abortion history, and number of transfused units (≥3 units of blood/blood component) have 3.3, 3.85, 4.2, and 3.9 times greater odds, respectively, besides their significant association with the incidence of acute transfusion reactions. Patients with a history of previous transfusion, abortion, multi-unit transfusion, and patients transfused with blood stored forâ ≥14 days should be closely monitored. Starting a hemovigilance system of monitoring, collecting, and evaluating data on adverse effects of blood transfusion locally and nationally will decrease the occurrence of acute transfusion reactions.
Sujet(s)
Réaction transfusionnelle , Humains , Éthiopie/épidémiologie , Études transversales , Femelle , Mâle , Réaction transfusionnelle/épidémiologie , Adulte , Incidence , Adulte d'âge moyen , Centres hospitaliers universitaires , Facteurs de risque , Jeune adulte , Transfusion sanguine/statistiques et données numériques , Transfusion sanguine/méthodes , AdolescentRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: We present a case study dealing with the emotional coping of a physician's exposure to continuous traumatic stress starting with the events of Oct. 7, 2023 and during the following months. BACKGROUND: The medical staff at Soroka Medical Center in southern Israel have faced unprecedented challenges over the past months due to ongoing conflict along the Gaza border. Since October 7, 2023, over 2,550 wounded patients have been treated at Soroka for injuries of varying severity, with more than 250 requiring life-saving surgeries. As the region's largest trauma center, Soroka's staff have endured continuous exposure to traumatic stress, suffering, distress and grief - both within the hospital and in their personal lives. CONCLUSIONS: While the long-term impacts remain to be seen, preliminary findings suggest that organizational efforts during routine may help mitigate potential negative effects of exposure to traumatic stress in the course of emergency. Further research is needed to understand how cumulative exposure interacts with process of recovery and growth. DISCUSSION: The current report presents the different layers of traumatic exposure, the associated risk and resilience factors and a perception that was instilled in the hospital in the years preceding the current war which promoted a culture of proactive peer discourse about emotional hardship and normalization of referral for professional help when needed. We also present coping behaviors that were common among many staff members and organizational responses, considering the uniqueness of the current challenges, their scope and duration.
Sujet(s)
Adaptation psychologique , Résilience psychologique , Humains , Israël , Centres hospitaliers universitaires , Mâle , Émotions , Stress psychologique , Chagrin , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/étiologie , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/psychologie , Adulte , Personnel médical hospitalier/psychologie , Médecins/psychologie , Plaies et blessures/psychologie , Centres de traumatologieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: United States rural community-based practices are increasingly participating in undergraduate and graduate medical education to train the workforce of the future, and are required or encouraged to provide academic appointments to physicians who have typically not held an academic appointment. Mechanisms to identify faculty and award academic appointments across an entire health system have not been reported. METHODS: Our rural community regional practice identified academic appointments as important for participating in medical education. Over a three-year period, our regional leadership organized a formal education committee that led a variety of administrative changes to promote the adoption of academic rank. Data on attainment of academic appointments was obtained from our Academic Appointment and Promotion Committee, and cross referenced with data from our regional human resources department using self-reported demographic data. RESULTS: We describe a successful adoption strategy for awarding academic rank in a rural regional practice in which the percentage of physician staff with academic rank increased from 41.1 to 92.8% over a 3-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that process changes can rapidly increase and then sustain academic appointments for physicians over time. More rural health systems may want to consider the use of academic rank to support educational programs while enhancing physician satisfaction, recruitment and retention.
Sujet(s)
Centres hospitaliers universitaires , Services de santé ruraux , Humains , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administration , Services de santé ruraux/organisation et administration , États-Unis , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecineRÉSUMÉ
Background: Adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) have been associated with cardiometabolic disease; however, disparities in cardiometabolic outcomes are rarely the result of a single risk factor. Objective: This study aimed to identify and characterize SDoH phenotypes based on patient-reported and neighborhood-level data from the institutional electronic medical record and evaluate the prevalence of diabetes, obesity, and other cardiometabolic diseases by phenotype status. Methods: Patient-reported SDoH were collected (January to December 2020) and neighborhood-level social vulnerability, neighborhood socioeconomic status, and rurality were linked via census tract to geocoded patient addresses. Diabetes status was coded in the electronic medical record using International Classification of Diseases codes; obesity was defined using measured BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Latent class analysis was used to identify clusters of SDoH (eg, phenotypes); we then examined differences in the prevalence of cardiometabolic conditions based on phenotype status using prevalence ratios (PRs). Results: Complete data were available for analysis for 2380 patients (mean age 53, SD 16 years; n=1405, 59% female; n=1198, 50% non-White). Roughly 8% (n=179) reported housing insecurity, 30% (n=710) reported resource needs (food, health care, or utilities), and 49% (n=1158) lived in a high-vulnerability census tract. We identified 3 patient SDoH phenotypes: (1) high social risk, defined largely by self-reported SDoH (n=217, 9%); (2) adverse neighborhood SDoH (n=1353, 56%), defined largely by adverse neighborhood-level measures; and (3) low social risk (n=810, 34%), defined as low individual- and neighborhood-level risks. Patients with an adverse neighborhood SDoH phenotype had higher prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes (PR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33), hypertension (PR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27), peripheral vascular disease (PR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09-1.97), and heart failure (PR 1.46, 95% CI 1.20-1.79). Conclusions: Patients with the adverse neighborhood SDoH phenotype had higher prevalence of poor cardiometabolic conditions compared to phenotypes determined by individual-level characteristics, suggesting that neighborhood environment plays a role, even if individual measures of socioeconomic status are not suboptimal.
Sujet(s)
Maladies cardiovasculaires , Analyse de structure latente , Phénotype , Déterminants sociaux de la santé , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Prévalence , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Maladies cardiovasculaires/épidémiologie , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , Facteurs de risqueRÉSUMÉ
Medical librarians work collaboratively across all units and missions of academic medical centers. One area where librarians can provide key expertise is in the building and maintenance of Research Information Management Systems (RIMS). At Penn State, the RIMS implementation team has included a medical librarian, research administrators and marketing staff from the College of Medicine (CoM) since its inception in 2016. As our peer institutions implemented or expanded their own RIMS systems, the CoM team has responded to their questions regarding details about the Penn State RIMS instance. The goal of this commentary is to describe how the CoM team has worked collaboratively within Penn State to address questions related to research output, with special emphasis on details pertaining to questions from other institutions.
Sujet(s)
Bibliothécaire , Bibliothèques médicales , Rôle professionnel , Humains , Bibliothèques médicales/organisation et administration , Recherche biomédicale/organisation et administration , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/organisation et administrationRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers prevalent in 0.3% of solid tumors. They are most common in salivary gland cancer (2.6%), thyroid cancer (1.6%), and soft-tissue sarcoma (1.5%). Currently, there are 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies for NTRK gene fusions: larotrectinib, approved in 2018, and entrectinib, approved in 2019. To date, the real-world uptake of tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitor (TRKi) use for NTRK-positive solid tumors in academic cancer centers remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, clinical and genomic characteristics, and testing and treatment patterns of patients with NTRK-positive solid tumors treated at US academic cancer centers. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study conducted in academic cancer centers in the United States. All patients diagnosed with an NTRK fusion-positive (NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3) solid tumor (any stage) and who received cancer treatment at participating sites between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2023, were included in this study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, genomic characteristics, NTRK testing data, and treatment patterns were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive statistics as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 6 centers contributed data for 55 patients with NTRK-positive tumors. The mean age was 49.3 (SD = 20.5) years, 51% patients were female, and the majority were White (78%). The median duration of time from cancer diagnosis to NTRK testing was 85 days (IQR = 44-978). At the time of NTRK testing, 64% of patients had stage IV disease, compared with 33% at cancer diagnosis. Prevalent cancer types in the overall cohort included head and neck (15%), thyroid (15%), brain (13%), lung (13%), and colorectal (11%). NTRK1 fusions were most common (45%), followed by NTRK3 (40%) and NTRK2 (15%). Across all lines of therapy, 51% of patients (n = 28) received a TRKi. Among TRKi-treated patients, 71% had stage IV disease at TRKi initiation. The median time from positive NTRK test to initiation of TRKi was 48 days (IQR = 9-207). TRKis were commonly given as first-line (30%) or second-line (48%) therapies. Median duration of therapy was 610 (IQR = 182-764) days for TRKi use and 207.5 (IQR = 42-539) days for all other first-line therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports on contemporary real-world NTRK testing patterns and use of TRKis in solid tumors, including time between NTRK testing and initiation of TRKi therapy and duration of TRKi therapy.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs , Inhibiteurs de protéines kinases , Récepteur trkA , Récepteur trkB , Récepteur trkC , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Études rétrospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , États-Unis , Tumeurs/génétique , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Récepteur trkC/génétique , Sujet âgé , Récepteur trkA/génétique , Adulte , Inhibiteurs de protéines kinases/usage thérapeutique , Récepteur trkB/génétique , Centres hospitaliers universitaires , Glycoprotéines membranaires/génétique , Protéines de fusion oncogènes/génétique , Études de cohortes , Pyrimidines/usage thérapeutique , Pyrazoles/usage thérapeutique , Benzamides/usage thérapeutique , Jeune adulte , Indazoles/usage thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: recent worldwide data has shown a concerning decline in the number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We suspected a similar trend at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (CHBAH). Methods: a retrospective descriptive study was conducted to evaluate and compare all ACS-related admissions to the cardiac care unit (CCU) at CHBAH in the pre-COVID-19 (November 2019 to March 2020) and during COVID-19 periods (April 2020 to August 2020). Results: the study comprised 182 patients with a mean age of 57.9 ±10.9 years (22.5% females). Of these, 108 (59.32%) patients were admitted in the pre-COVID-19 period and 74 (40.66%) during COVID-19 (p=0.0109). During the pre-COVID-19 period, 42.9% of patients had ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 39.2% with non-ST-segment -elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) was noted in 18.52%. In contrast, STEMI was noted in 50%, NSTEMI in 43.24% and UA in 6.76% of patients during the COVID-19 period. A statistically significant difference in STEMI and NSTEMI-related admissions was not noted, however, there was a greater number of admissions for UA during the pre-COVID-19 period (18.52% vs 6.76%, P =0.013). Only a third of the patients with STEMI received thrombolysis during the pre-and COVID-19 periods (30.4% vs 37.8%, P=0.47). No difference in the number of PCI procedures was noted between the pre-and during the COVID-19 periods (78.7% vs 72.9%, P=0.37). Conclusion: there was a difference in overall ACS admissions to the CCU between pre-and during COVID-19 periods, however no difference between STEMI and NSTEMI in both periods. A higher number of UA admissions was noted during the pre-COVID-19 period. During both periods, the use of thrombolysis was low for STEMI and no difference in PCI was noted.
Sujet(s)
Syndrome coronarien aigu , COVID-19 , Intervention coronarienne percutanée , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST , Humains , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/thérapie , Femelle , Syndrome coronarien aigu/thérapie , Syndrome coronarien aigu/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , République d'Afrique du Sud/épidémiologie , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/statistiques et données numériques , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/méthodes , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/épidémiologie , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/thérapie , Hôpitaux urbains/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Infarctus du myocarde sans sus-décalage du segment ST/épidémiologie , Infarctus du myocarde sans sus-décalage du segment ST/thérapie , Unités de soins intensifs cardiaques/statistiques et données numériques , Centres hospitaliers universitaires/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
Advancing public health through prevention necessitates collaboration among public, private, and community actors. Only together can these different actors amass the resources, knowledge, and community outreach required to promote health. Recent studies have suggested that university medical centres (UMCs) can play a key role in regional prevention networks, given their capacity to initiate, coordinate, drive, and monitor large partnerships. Yet, the literature often refers to prevention activities in general, leaving underexplored what UMCs can add to primary, universal prevention networks specifically. Moreover, UMCs operate in a crowded field of other organizations with extensive experience in primary prevention, who will already have an idea about what role UMCs should play in the network. This article presents a case study examining the potential role of a UMC within a densely interconnected stakeholder environment in the surroundings of a large city in the Netherlands. Combining insights from public health studies and network governance research, and integrating data from various methods, this study concludes that UMCs can enhance their contributions to prevention by assuming the role of network servants rather than network leaders. Stakeholders consider public health authorities or municipal governments as more logical candidates for coordinating the network. Moreover, partners often perceive-deservedly or not-UMCs as overly focused on the medical aspects of prevention, potentially neglecting social interventions, and as favouring universal treatments over tailor-made community interventions. At the same time, partner organizations hope that the UMCs join collaborations within the community, using their expertise to measure the impact of interventions and leveraging their prestige to generate attention for primary prevention. By synthesizing theoretical insights from multiple disciplines and analysing the empirics of network leaderships through multiple methods, this study offers UMCs a contextually-informed perspective on how to position themselves effectively within primary prevention networks.