Review of Gender Affirming Mastectomy Surgery: Comparing Drains Versus No Drains.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming mastectomy can improve mental health and gender expression. However, there is no consensus on routine drain usage in gender-affirming surgeries. The purpose of this study is to compare gender-affirming mastectomies with and without drains and review complications. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review was performed to identify patients between 2017-2021 who had double-incision mastectomy, with or without nipple graft, and separated into drain and no-drain cohorts. Patient demographics, outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed, including unplanned return to the operating room, seromas, hematomas, postoperative infection, and postoperative antibiotic use. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 359 patients that had a gender-affirming mastectomy surgery between 2017 and 2021. The mean age was 26.1 years old, and mean body mass index was 27.4. There were 144 patients (40.1%) who had a drain, and 215 patients (59.9%) without a drain. For postoperative complications of all patients, there were 12 (3.3%) unplanned returns to the operating room, 18 seromas (5.0%), 26 hematomas (7.2%), 50 (13.9%) postoperative antibiotic use, and 4 postoperative infections (1.1%). There were no significant differences found between drain use for all postoperative complications, but no-drain use was significantly associated with less prescribed postoperative antibiotics compared to drain use (3.7% and 29.0%, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming mastectomy surgeries are safe and effective treatment options. No-drain placement was not associated with increased postoperative complications. Surgeons may consider not prescribing routine postoperative antibiotics if using drains, and avoiding drains for gender-affirming mastectomies may be considered in selected individuals based on clinical judgment.

The landscape of Medicare policies for gender-affirming surgeries in Canada: an environmental scan.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have described barriers to gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in Canada; however, few have explored why these barriers persist. To address this knowledge gap, we sought to describe documents related to public health insurance (Medicare) for GAS to identify the types of procedures covered, variations in coverage across provinces and territories, and changes in policy over time. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using an environmental scan approach. We queried 23 government websites, the Google search engine, and an online legal database between July 2022 and April 2024 to gather gray literature documents related to GAS and Medicare. Variables from relevant documents were compiled to create a present, at-glance overview of GAS Medicare coverage for all provinces and territories and a timeline of policy changes across Canada.  RESULTS: Eight provinces and three territories had documents or websites related to GAS Medicare coverage (85%). We identified 15 GAS procedures that were covered variably across Canada. Yukon (n = 14) covered the most types of GAS, while Quebec and Saskatchewan covered the least (n = 6). Mastectomy and genital surgeries were covered across Canada, but other GAS were rarely covered. Five provinces and territories provided coverage for travel-related costs. Our GAS Medicare timeline showed differential expansion of GAS coverage in Canada over the last 25 years. CONCLUSIONS : We provide previously unreported information regarding GAS Medicare coverage in Canada. We hope our findings will help patients and healthcare providers navigate a complicated public healthcare system. We also highlight barriers within GAS Medicare documents and make recommendations to alleviate those barriers.

The Role of Sex and Gender in Transgender Bone and Other Musculoskeletal Health.

ABSTRACT: Musculoskeletal changes occur with gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) and gender-affirming surgery (GAS) used in the care of transgender adolescents and adults. Survey results have shown that orthopaedic surgeons desire to care for transgender individuals but express concern over a knowledge deficit. This article reviews the physiology and pathophysiology that may occur with GAHT and GAS. Transgender women have lower bone mineral density (BMD) prior to GAHT than cisgender men. Limited fracture data would suggest that transgender women >50 years of age have fracture rates similar to those of cisgender women. Transgender men have normal BMD prior to GAHT and are not at an increased risk for fracture compared with cisgender women. The use of puberty-blocking medications in the care of transgender youth does result in a decline in BMD, which returns to baseline with GAHT, but the effect of delaying puberty on maximal BMD and the lifetime fracture risk are unknown. At present, dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used to measure BMD and assess fracture risk. Attention should be paid to using the appropriate reference group in the interpretation of DXA for transgender individuals. Promote musculoskeletal health by ensuring appropriate calcium, vitamin D, weight-bearing activity, and a healthy lifestyle. Adherence to GAHT needs to be encouraged to avoid bone loss. Data with regard to therapy for osteoporosis in transgender patients have been lacking, but, at present, use of available therapies is expected to be effective. Information with regard to differences in other musculoskeletal health issues such as joint injuries has been lacking in transgender individuals.

Hypergranulation management following penile inversion vaginoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize current knowledge regarding management of hypergranulation in the context of gender-affirming vaginoplasty. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: There have been no studies to date examining hypergranulation treatment options following vaginoplasty. Evidence from the literature on this complication in other settings and the opinions of authorities and experts in this area were used to inform this review. MAIN MESSAGE: Hypergranulation is a common complication of vaginoplasty, but many care providers may not know how to identify or treat it. This short report will review hypergranulation after vaginoplasty, including risk factors, identification, and treatment options such as douching, silver nitrate, and topical steroids. CONCLUSION: By increasing clinicians' knowledge of this pervasive complication, patients' postsurgical care and outcomes can be improved.

Enhanced Recovery After Gender-Affirming Surgery.

The adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in multiple surgical disciplines has revolutionized perioperative care, demonstrating reduced complications and shorter hospital stays across surgical specialties. ERAS protocols have increasingly been incorporated in plastic surgery, yet a notable gap in the literature on ERAS for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) still exists. A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies on ERAS protocols in GAS. The aim of this review was to assess the current status of ERAS adoption in GAS, evaluate its impact on perioperative care, and provide recommendations for future research and clinical practice. While there is an overall scarcity of evidence-based ERAS protocols across GAS, published studies on the application of ERAS in GAS have demonstrated promising early outcomes and illustrate an area for further investigation and innovation in plastic surgery.

The pedicled Antero lateral thigh flap for gender affirming surgery: what is different? First case series outcomes of a single center from Turkey.

The aim of this study is to share our preliminary outcomes of the pedicled Antero Lateral Thigh flap (ALTf) phalloplasty technique, which we presume to be the first reported case series of a single center from Turkey. A cross-sectional study, comprising all cases who underwent pedicled ALTf phalloplasty in our clinic, between January 2015 and December 2019, was designed. Demographic data, case characteristics and surgical details including complications were recorded. The mean age of our 26 cases was 30 (28-34) years. The mean penile length and diameter were 15.07 ± 0.98 cm and 3.9 ± 0.34 cm, respectively. Tactile sensation was evaluated by touching the radix, corpus and tip of the neo-phallus showing response in 17 (65.4%), 7 (26.9%) and 2 (7.7%) of the cases, respectively. In 14 (53.8%) of all our cases no complication was reported at all. However, in 12 (46.1%) cases, although no intraoperative complication occurred; postoperative complications were observed as Clavien-2 (3.8%), Clavien-3a (3.8%) and Clavien-3b (71%). Postoperative satisfaction rates were found 77.14% (38-94). Although relevant studies are limited, in addition to low complication rates and high satisfactory outcomes, by leading to a concealable donor site, the pedicled ALTf can be used as a preferred phalloplasty technique, especially in transmen with religious or cultural sensibility.

Anesthetic Considerations for Gender-Affirming Airway and Facial Procedures.

Approximately 0.6% of the United States population identifies as transgender or gender nonbinary. The term transgender refers to a person who experiences incongruence between their sex at birth and their gender identity. The care of the transgender patient is complex, often requiring the expertise of various medical and surgical specialties. The prevalence of gender-affirming surgery is increasing as societal acceptance and cultural norms are shifting. While gender-affirming procedures include a variety of body systems, airway and facial procedures are of particular importance to anesthesia providers. Anesthetic concerns for masculinization and feminization procedures of the airway and face include bleeding, injury to the airway, and other perioperative challenges. Transgender procedures of the airway and face often require advanced airway techniques. Following airway surgery, patients are at an increased risk for tracheal stenosis or perforation, glottic stenosis, vocal cord damage or dysfunction, and/or dysphagia. Additionally, transgender patients may undergo hormone therapy to achieve their gender goals. Providers should be aware of the implications associated with administration of hormones such as thromboembolic events, cardiovascular effects, and changes in various laboratory values. A knowledge of novel surgical procedures, medical therapies, and the psychosocial implications associated with transition is essential for the safe, comprehensive, and holistic care of the transgender patient.

Ulcerative colitis in a transgender woman with a sigmoid neovagina: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Sex reassignment surgery (SRS) is a necessary step in transitioning into the desired gender for male-to-female transgender individuals. This study focuses on a rare complication developed following SRS, aiming to highlight potential complications associated with this procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes a 49-year-old transgender woman with a history of SRS who developed bloody diarrhea and neovaginal bleeding 10 years later. A colonoscopy revealed features compatible with ulcerative colitis, which was confirmed by a biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The unpredictable clinical course of this phenomenon may prompt surgeons to reconsider the use of a rectosigmoid colon to create a neovagina. This case report underscores the necessity of long-term monitoring for gastrointestinal complications in transgender women post-SRS when a rectosigmoid colon segment is utilized for neovaginal construction.

Which Is the Best Surgical Approach for Female-to-Male Sexual Reassignment? A Systematic Review of Hysterectomy and Salpingo-Oophorectomy Options from the Gynecological Perspective.

Background and Objectives: Transgender people are defined as individuals whose gender identity does not entirely match their sex assigned at birth. Gender surgery typically represents the conclusive and irreversible step in the therapeutic process, especially for the impact on the reproductive sphere. The increased awareness of gender dysphoria and the expanding array of medical and surgical options, including minimally invasive techniques, contribute to the gradual increase in the social impact of transgender surgery. There are several surgical techniques for "gender assignment", such as vaginal, laparotomic, laparoscopic, and robotic, and the novel approach of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to perform a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). The purpose of this review is to assess the various surgical approaches (hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy) for gender reassignment in order to determine the best option in clinical practice for the female-to-male population in terms of surgical outcomes such as operative time, surgical complication, hospital discharge, postoperative pain, and bleeding. Materials and Methods: This systematic review includes studies from 2007 to 2024. Special consideration was given to articles documenting the characteristics and management of female-to-male reassignment surgery. Finally, eight papers were included in this review. Results: The literature analysis considered surgical techniques ranging from traditional surgery to innovative methods like vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and the robotic approach offer potential benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays. While vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery may encounter challenges due to narrow access and smaller vaginal dimensions, robotic single-site hysterectomy may face instrument conflict. Conclusions: The conventional laparoscopic approach remains widely used, demonstrating safety and efficacy. Overall, this review underscores the evolving landscape of surgical techniques for gender affirmation and emphasizes the necessity for personalized approaches to meet the specific needs of transgender patients.

The lived experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in accessing publicly funded penile-inversion vaginoplasty in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Canada's health care systems underserve people who are transgender and gender diverse (TGD), leading to unique disparities not experienced by other patient groups, such as in accessing gender-affirmation surgery. We sought to explore the experiences of TGD people seeking and accessing gender-affirmation surgery at a publicly funded hospital in Canada to identify opportunities to improve the current system. METHODS: We used hermeneutic phenomenology according to Max van Manen to conduct this qualitative study. Between January and August 2022, we conducted interviews with TGD people who had undergone penile-inversion vaginoplasty at Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, since June 2019. We conducted interviews via Microsoft Teams and transcribed them verbatim. We coded the transcripts using NVivo version 12. Using inductive analysis, we constructed themes, which we mapped onto van Manen's framework of lived body, lived time, lived space, and lived human relations. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 participants who had undergone penile-inversion vaginoplasty; they predominantly self-identified as transgender women (n = 13) and White (n = 14). Participants lived in rural (n = 4), suburban (n = 5), or urban (n = 6) locations. Their median age was 32 (range 27-67) years. We identified 11 themes that demonstrated the interconnected nature of TGD peoples' lived experiences over many years leading up to accessing gender-affirmation surgery. These themes emphasized the role of the body in experiencing the world and shaping identity, the lived experience of the body in shaping human connectedness, and participants' intersecting identities and emotional pain (lived body); participants' experiences of the passage of time and progression of events (lived time); environments inducing existential anxiety or fostering affirmation, the role of technology in shaping participants' understanding of the body, and the effect of liminal spaces (lived space); and finally, the role of communication and language, empathy and compassion, and participants' experiences of loss of trust and connection (lived human relations). INTERPRETATION: Our findings reveal TGD patients' lived experiences as they navigated a lengthy and often difficult journey to penile-inversion vaginoplasty. They suggest a need for improved access to gender-affirmation surgery by reducing wait times, increasing capacity, and improving care experiences.

Technical Pearls and Pitfalls of Facial Feminization Surgery: A Review of Techniques From a Single Institutional Practice.

BACKGROUND: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an emerging practice that falls under the broader umbrella of gender-affirming surgery. Various approaches exist to feminize the face, yet few published articles describe in detail the techniques of each component procedure. Considering the diversity of interventions employed, the objective of this manuscript is to highlight FFS techniques utilized by the senior author and create a corresponding media gallery. METHODS: All patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria that were referred to the senior author for FFS consultation between June 2017 and August 2022 were reviewed. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records according to the institutional review board (IRB)-approved study protocol. Data collected and analyzed included demographics, operative documentation, and postoperative follow-up. Multimedia material was collected intraoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients underwent 262 operations with a total of 1224 FFS procedures. The average follow-up time was 7.7 ± 11 months. Out of the 262 operations, 24 (9.2%) patients experienced minor complications, including 3 (1.1%) with wound dehiscence, 13 (5.0%) with hematomas, and 14 (5.3%) with postoperative infection requiring antibiotics. Of those, 3 (1.1%) required a return to the operating room for washout or removal of malar implants. CONCLUSION: Although there is a consensus on the fundamental surgical principles to achieve adequate feminization of the facial architecture, the specific techniques to do so differ according to individual practices. As techniques diverge, so do their risk profiles and outcomes; techniques must, thus, align with patients' interventional goals. The material presented here is one of many that can support trainees and junior surgeons as they build a gender-affirming practice.

Sexual health in transgender and gender diverse people.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sexual health and sexual function are critical to the wellbeing of cisgender, transgender, and gender diverse populations. To date, there has been only limited patient-focused evaluation of sexual function in transgender and gender diverse patients at several stages in their gender-affirming medical care. There remains a need to better understand the impact of gender affirming medical and surgical therapy on sexual health, and to develop evidence-based treatments to address sexual dysfunction when present. RECENT FINDINGS: The impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy on sexual health is complex and evolves over time on treatment. Despite high incidences of complications, major genital gender-affirming surgeries such as vulvovaginoplasty and penile implant placement after phalloplasty yield high patient satisfaction. While treatments to preserve or restore erections and to improve vaginal lubrication have been trialed based upon literature in cisgender populations, there remains minimal evidence to guide medical treatment of sexual dysfunction ranging from erectile dysfunction to dyspareunia. SUMMARY: There is a continued need for ongoing efforts to develop patient-reported outcome measures and rigorous investigation of sexual health preservation and restoration treatments in transgender and gender diverse populations.

Association between genital gender-affirming surgery and psychiatric comorbidities in individuals with gender incongruence.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies present mixed evidence on the relationship between psychiatric comorbidities and genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS) in individuals with gender incongruence (GI). AIM: This research aims to investigate the psychiatric comorbidity rates post-GGAS in the GI population-namely, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorders, substance abuse disorder, and suicidality. METHODS: Based on the TriNetX health care database, an international database with >250 million patients, a cross-sectional study was executed comparing psychiatric comorbidity rates among cases of GI with and without GGAS. Individuals were matched for demographic and health-related variables, which included history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity. OUTCOMES: The main focus was to establish the rates and changes in psychiatric comorbidities following GGAS. RESULTS: Among individuals with GI, the study identified 4061 with GGAS and 100 097 without. At 1 year post-GGAS, there was a significant decrease in depression (odds ratio [OR], 0.748; 95% CI, 0.672-0.833; P < .0001), anxiety (OR, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.658-0.810; P < .0001), substance use disorder (OR, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.658-0.810; P < .0001), and suicidality (OR, 0.530; 95% CI, 0.425-0.661; P < .0001), and these reductions were maintained or improved on at 5 years, including posttraumatic stress disorder (OR, 0.831; 95% CI, 0.704-0.981; P = .028). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings indicate that GGAS may play a crucial role in diminishing psychiatric comorbidities among individuals with GI. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the largest known study to evaluate the effect of GGAS on psychiatric comorbidities in the GI population, offering robust evidence. The reliance on the precision of CPT and ICD-10 codes for data extraction poses a limitation due to potential coding inaccuracies. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests a significant association between GGAS and reduced psychiatric comorbidities in individuals with GI.

Differences in Subjective Transition Outcomes Between Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals Who Completed Mandatory Psychiatric Assessment and Those Who Received Gender-Affirmative Medical Treatment in Croatia: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.

The aim of this study was to evaluate different aspects of transition outcomes in groups of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people based on their transition status. We divided the 70 TGD participants (19 individuals assigned male at birth and 51 assigned female at birth) into two groups: those who had completed their psychiatric and psychological evaluation (PPE), which is mandatory in Croatia, and those who had undergone gender-affirming medical treatment (GAMT) (both gender-affirming hormone treatment and gender-affirming surgery). The online survey included sociodemographic questions and a custom-designed nine-item scale. The items were specifically designed based on the DSM-5-TR criteria for gender dysphoria to assess subjectively perceived transition outcomes. We conducted a factor analysis of the scale followed by structural equation modeling for confirmation. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare group differences. The following three-factor structure was confirmed: better functioning, reduced body dysphoria, and satisfaction with decision. A positive influence of better functioning on satisfaction with the decision was found. In addition, our results showed that TGD individuals who had undergone GAMT scored higher on better functioning than those who had just completed PPE. Both groups consistently scored high on satisfaction with the decision, with no statistically significant differences between them. Our findings suggest that TGD individuals view gender-affirming medical care as beneficial to their overall functioning.

Use of Titanium Mesh During Frontal Sinus Setback in Facial Feminization Surgery: Clinical Outcomes and Perspectives.

Brow position, hairline shape, and forehead projection may confer cis-feminine identity, and facial feminization surgery (FFS) can improve gender dysphoria among transfeminine patients. Depending on the Ousterhout classification, burring, osteotomy, anterior frontal sinus setback, and augmentation, with subsequent fixation via metal or bioabsorbable plates, can address forehead projection. However, titanium mesh, often used in frontal sinus fracture repair, has not been described for forehead contouring in FFS. The purpose of this study was to study clinical outcomes associated with the use of titanium mesh for the stabilization of bone following anterior frontal sinus setback. A retrospective cohort study of trans-female and nonbinary patients undergoing primary FFS by our senior author between January 2021 and February 2023 was performed. Variables collected include demographics, Ousterhout classification, operative details, complications, and follow-up duration. Patients with prior FFS or facial trauma were excluded. Data were analyzed using SPSS, (IBM, Armonk, NY). Forty-three transfeminine patients were included for analysis. The cohort had an average age of 33.0±8.7 years and a median follow-up time of 3.0 months (IQR = 1.0-7.0). Among our cohort, 26 patients (60.5%) received titanium mesh and 17 patients (39.5%) underwent burring only for forehead contouring. There were no reported complications (ie, infection, hardware extrusion, or mucocele formation) or a need for forehead revisions among the entire cohort regardless of the frontal sinus reconstruction material utilized. Clinical outcomes were favorable among patients receiving titanium mesh anterior table fixation during FFS. Titanium mesh can be considered as an additional technique for frontal bossing reduction and anterior table fixation in FFS.

Factors Affecting the Choice to Forgo Nipple Grafts in Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients pursuing gender-affirming mastectomy prefer to forgo autologous nipple and areolar reconstruction, instead choosing a "no nipple" option. The objective of this study is to evaluate the motives and influences contributing to this decision. METHODS: A retrospective survey-based study of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy over a 4.6-year period was conducted. All patients were offered nipple and areolar reconstruction. A survey was distributed to those who elected to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction exploring the factors influencing that choice and postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six patients underwent gender-affirming mastectomy and 13% chose to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction. The survey response rate was 72%. Most respondents identified as nonbinary (48%) or transmasculine (42%). Body image, defined in the context of this study as an improvement in body image satisfaction due to achievement of a more gender-congruent appearance, was the most highly cited and most heavily weighted decision-making factor. Concerns about nipple graft outcomes were frequently cited as important but carried less weight. There were no differences between transmasculine and nonbinary patients in terms of motivations for choosing this surgical option. Fifty-eight percent of respondents pursued or planned to pursue chest tattoos, whereas 42% preferred no further chest modifications. Patient satisfaction was high postoperatively (98%), and 82% of respondents would choose to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction again even if surgical outcomes of free nipple grafts were improved. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming mastectomy without nipple and areolar reconstruction was requested by 13% of patients presenting for gender-affirming chest surgery over the study period and had high postoperative satisfaction among patients who chose this option. This modification of gender-affirming mastectomy is a variation that surgical teams should be aware of. Many reasons to forgo nipple preservation were cited, most of which related to body image. Secondary factors were easier recovery and/or concern about outcomes of free nipple grafts. Many patients wished information about this surgical option was more widely available.

Imaging the acute complications of gender-affirming surgeries: a primer for radiologists in the emergency setting.

Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is increasingly being performed. GAS is tailored to the patient leading to a diverse spectrum of radiologic post-operative findings. Radiologists who are unfamiliar with expected anatomic alterations after GAS may misdiagnose important complications leading to adverse patient outcomes. This collaborative multi-institutional review aims to: Describe relevant embryology and native anatomy. Describe relevant Gender-Affirming Surgery (GAS) techniques and expected neo-anatomy with associated complications, including common terminology. Review expected imaging appearance of neo-anatomy/postoperative findings. Review multi-modality [ultrasound, plain film, retrograde urethrogram, computed tomography] emergent imaging findings. Understand unique patient evaluation and imaging protocol considerations in the GAS population. Discuss pearls and pitfalls of imaging in the acute post-GAS setting.

The robotic-assisted free jejunal flap for neovaginal canal creation in gender-affirming vaginoplasties.

INTRODUCTION: One of the biggest challenges with gender-affirming vaginoplasty was the creation of a long-lasting, durable, patent, and self-lubricating neovaginal canal that allowed for spontaneous, pain-free sexual intercourse. The jejunum was a durable, physiologic, and intestinal option to create the neovaginal canal that minimizes the adverse effects of skin graft, peritoneal, and colonic vaginoplasties. Free jejunal vaginoplasties had been performed in cis females for congenital genitourinary anomalies like Mullerian agenesis or after gynecologic-oncologic surgery but had yet to be reported for gender-affirming vaginoplasties. The purpose of this report was to present a technique for a physiologic, intestinal, gender-affirming vaginoplasty without the disadvantages of colonic vaginoplasties. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report presented six patients, all natal males who identified as female, undergoing robotic-assisted free jejunal flap gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Mean age was 35.8 years (range: 21-66). Mean body mass index was 33.2 kg/m2 (range: 28.0-41.0). The proximal aspect of the neovaginal canal was created intra-abdominally by elevating peritoneal flaps from the posterior bladder wall to be reflected downward into the external neovaginal canal. The jejunal flap was harvested. The greater saphenous vein was harvested to create an arteriovenous loop between the flap vessels and the recipient femoral artery in an end-to-side fashion and a branch of the femoral vein. The jejunal flap was passed intra-abdominally through the groin incision and then trans-peritoneally into the neovaginal canal. The jejunal segment was inset to the proximal peritoneal flaps and the distal inverted penoscrotal skin of the neovaginal introitus. RESULTS: Mean length of the harvest jejunal segment was 19.2 cm (range: 15-20). Mean time to ambulation, foley removal, and first vaginal dilation were 3.3 (range: 3-4), 4.0 (range: 3-5), and 4.5 days (range: 4-6), respectively. By a mean follow-up duration of 8.0 months (range: 1-14), mean vaginal depth and diameter were 7.0 and 1.3 cm (range: 1.0-1.5), respectively. Two (33.3%) patients experienced postoperative complications, including groin hematoma (n = 1, 16.7%) and reoperation for correction of dehiscence of the jejunal flap to the vaginal introitus (n = 1, 16.7%). CONCLUSION: Gender-affirming surgeons should consider a free vascularized segment of jejunum as an option to line the neovaginal canal in the correct patients.