Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 6.268
Filtrer
2.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1430901, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947337

RÉSUMÉ

A maternal vaccine to protect newborns against invasive Streptococcus agalactiae infection is a developing medical need. The vaccine should be offered during the third trimester of pregnancy and induce strong immune responses and placental transfer of protective antibodies. Polysaccharide vaccines against S. agalactiae conjugated to protein carriers are in advanced stages of development. Additionally, protein-based vaccines are also in development, showing great promise as they can provide protection regardless of serotype. Furthermore, safety concerns regarding a new vaccine are the main barriers identified. Here, we present vaccines in development and identified safety, cost, and efficacy concerns, especially in high-need, low-income countries.


Sujet(s)
Infections à streptocoques , Vaccins antistreptococciques , Streptococcus agalactiae , Streptococcus agalactiae/immunologie , Humains , Infections à streptocoques/immunologie , Infections à streptocoques/prévention et contrôle , Infections à streptocoques/microbiologie , Vaccins antistreptococciques/immunologie , Grossesse , Femelle , Animaux , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/immunologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/microbiologie , Développement de vaccin , Nouveau-né , Anticorps antibactériens/immunologie
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2419268, 2024 Jul 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976271

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: A nonadjuvanted bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F (RSVpreF [Pfizer]) protein subunit vaccine was newly approved and recommended for pregnant individuals at 32 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks' gestation during the 2023 to 2024 RSV season; however, clinical vaccine data are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the association between prenatal RSV vaccination status and perinatal outcomes among patients who delivered during the vaccination season. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at 2 New York City hospitals within 1 health care system among patients who gave birth to singleton gestations at 32 weeks' gestation or later from September 22, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Exposure: Prenatal RSV vaccination with the RSVpreF vaccine captured from the health system's electronic health records. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome is preterm birth (PTB), defined as less than 37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), stillbirth, small-for-gestational age birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal respiratory distress with NICU admission, neonatal jaundice or hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and neonatal sepsis. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), and multivariable logistic regression models and time-dependent covariate Cox regression models were performed. Results: Of 2973 pregnant individuals (median [IQR] age, 34.9 [32.4-37.7] years), 1026 (34.5%) received prenatal RSVpreF vaccination. Fifteen patients inappropriately received the vaccine at 37 weeks' gestation or later and were included in the nonvaccinated group. During the study period, 60 patients who had evidence of prenatal vaccination (5.9%) experienced PTB vs 131 of those who did not (6.7%). Prenatal vaccination was not associated with an increased risk for PTB after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.20) and addressing immortal time bias (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.34). There were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes based on vaccination status in the logistic regression models, but an increased risk of HDP in the time-dependent model was seen (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.16-1.77). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of pregnant individuals who delivered at 32 weeks' gestation or later, the RSVpreF vaccine was not associated with an increased risk of PTB and perinatal outcomes. These data support the safety of prenatal RSVpreF vaccination, but further investigation into the risk of HDP is warranted.


Sujet(s)
Naissance prématurée , Infections à virus respiratoire syncytial , Vaccins contre les virus respiratoires syncytiaux , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Études rétrospectives , Adulte , Infections à virus respiratoire syncytial/prévention et contrôle , Nouveau-né , Vaccins contre les virus respiratoires syncytiaux/effets indésirables , New York (ville)/épidémiologie , Naissance prématurée/épidémiologie , Issue de la grossesse/épidémiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Vaccination/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle
4.
Benef Microbes ; 15(4): 387-396, 2024 Jun 28.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955352

RÉSUMÉ

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of bacterial neonatal sepsis. This study aimed to confirm the effect of Ligilactobacillus salivarius V4II-90 on GBS colonisation during pregnancy. A randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in seven hospitals in Madrid, Spain. The sample was broken down into two groups with 20 participants each (n = 40) in order to show reduced GBS colonisation frequency in the probiotic versus the placebo group. Pregnant participants positive for vaginal-rectal colonisation before or during the 13th week of gestation were randomly assigned to either the placebo or the probiotic group. The probiotic, L. salivarius V4II-90 at 1 × 109 cfu/day was administered for 12 weeks, starting at week 21-23 of gestation. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with vaginal and/or rectal GBS colonisation at the end of the intervention period (35 weeks of gestation). Secondary outcomes were changes in the microbial composition of vaginal and rectal exudates; premature delivery; premature rupture of membranes; intrapartum antibiotics; new-borns with early or late-onset GBS sepsis; adverse events (AEs); and GBS test results performed at the hospital at week 35 of gestation. Of the 481 participants included, 44 were vaginal-rectal colonised with GBS and randomised. 43 completed the study (20 in the probiotic group and 23 in the placebo group). After intervention, GBS was eradicated in six participants (27%) from the placebo group and in twelve participants (63%) from the probiotic group ( P = 0.030). None of the 185 AEs reported were identified as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the investigational product. In conclusion, oral administration of L. salivarius V4II-90 is a safe and successful strategy to significantly decrease the rates of GBS colonisation at the end of pregnancy and, therefore, to reduce the exposure of subjects and their infants to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT03669094.


Sujet(s)
Ligilactobacillus salivarius , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , Probiotiques , Rectum , Infections à streptocoques , Streptococcus agalactiae , Vagin , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Probiotiques/administration et posologie , Méthode en double aveugle , Streptococcus agalactiae/croissance et développement , Streptococcus agalactiae/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Infections à streptocoques/prévention et contrôle , Infections à streptocoques/microbiologie , Infections à streptocoques/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Vagin/microbiologie , Rectum/microbiologie , Ligilactobacillus salivarius/physiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/microbiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/traitement médicamenteux , Nouveau-né , Espagne , Jeune adulte
5.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994460

RÉSUMÉ

Monkeypox (MPX), an orthopoxviral disease endemic in Africa, is now a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) as declared by the World Health Organization in July 2023. Although it is generally mild, the overall case fatality rate was reported to be 3%, and the basic reproduction number (R0) is > 1 in men who have sex with men (MSM, i.e., Portugal (1.4), the United Kingdom (1.6), and Spain (1.8)). However, R0 is < 1 in other settings. In concordance with the smallpox virus, it is also expected to increase the risk of adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. The outcomes of the disease in an immunocompromised state of pregnancy are scary, showing high mortality and morbidity of both mother and fetus, with up to a 75% risk of fetal side effects and a 25% risk of severe maternal diseases. Therefore, it warrants timely diagnosis and intervention. The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) test is the standard approach to diagnosis. We summarized the recent findings of MPX on pregnancy, and the associated risk factors. We also give recommendations for active fetal surveillance, perinatal care, and good reporting to improve outcomes. The available vaccines have shown promise for primary disease prevention.


Sujet(s)
Pays en voie de développement , Orthopoxvirose simienne , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , Humains , Grossesse , Femelle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Orthopoxvirose simienne/diagnostic , Orthopoxvirose simienne/épidémiologie , Orthopoxvirose simienne/prévention et contrôle
6.
Am J Reprod Immunol ; 92(1): e13896, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994889

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Recent data in nonpregnant individuals suggest a protective effect of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to evaluate whether influenza vaccination was associated with COVID-19 severity and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among those infected with SARS-CoV-2. The secondary objective was to examine the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of pregnant people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020, and a cohort of random deliveries during the same time period. The associations between 2019 influenza vaccination and the primary outcome of moderate-to-critical COVID-19 as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes were examined among all people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020. The association between 2019 influenza vaccination and having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was examined among a cohort of individuals who delivered on randomly selected dates between March and August 2020. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 2325 people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1068 (45.9%) were vaccinated against influenza in 2019. Those who received the influenza vaccine were older, leaner, more likely to have private insurance, and identify as White or Hispanic. They were less likely to smoke tobacco and identify as Black. Overall, 419 (18.0%) had moderate, 193 (8.3%) severe, and 52 (2.2%) critical COVID-19. There was no association between influenza vaccination and moderate-to-critical COVID-19 (29.2% vs. 28.0%, adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34) or adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among those who tested positive. Of 8152 people who delivered in 2020, 4658 (57.1%) received the influenza vaccine. Prior vaccination was not associated with a difference in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.8% vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19). CONCLUSION: Prior influenza vaccination was not associated with decreased severity of COVID-19 or lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccins antigrippaux , Grippe humaine , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Vaccins antigrippaux/immunologie , Vaccins antigrippaux/administration et posologie , Adulte , Études rétrospectives , SARS-CoV-2/immunologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/épidémiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Grippe humaine/prévention et contrôle , Grippe humaine/épidémiologie , Issue de la grossesse , Nouveau-né , Jeune adulte , Indice de gravité de la maladie
8.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 430, 2024 Jul 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965487

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Nevirapine prophylaxis has been found to lower the risk of HIV transmission in breastfed infants. While about 95% of HIV positive pregnant and lactating mothers use Antiretroviral therapy in Uganda, a smaller percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) receive nevirapine (NVP) prophylaxis. This study aimed to determine the proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis and associated factors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study done using quantitative methods, conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH). A total of 228 mother-infant pairs were enrolled. The proportion of HEI who missed NVP, maternal, infant and health facility factors associated were determined using a pre-tested questionnaire. Bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression model were used to determine the proportion and factors associated with missing NVP prophylaxis. RESULTS: The proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis was 50/228 (21.9%). Factors significantly associated with HEI missing NVP prophylaxis included delivery from outside government health facilities (AOR = 8.41; P = 0.001), mothers not undergoing PMTCT counselling (AOR = 12.01; P = 0.001), not on ART (AOR = 8.47; P = 0.003) and not having disclosed their HIV status to their partners (AOR = 2.80; P = 0.001). The HEI that missed nevirapine and were HIV positive were 35 (70.0%). The HEI that were HIV infected despite receiving nevirapine prophylaxis were 5 out of 40(12.5%). CONCLUSION: One in five HEI missed NVP prophylaxis and nearly three quarters of those who missed NVP prophylaxis were HIV infected. Improving uptake of nevirapine by HEI will require interventions that can aid to strengthen PMTCT counselling.


Sujet(s)
Agents antiVIH , Infections à VIH , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse , Névirapine , Humains , Névirapine/usage thérapeutique , Études transversales , Ouganda , Femelle , Infections à VIH/prévention et contrôle , Infections à VIH/traitement médicamenteux , Nourrisson , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse/prévention et contrôle , Agents antiVIH/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Nouveau-né , Mâle , Jeune adulte , Grossesse , Adhésion au traitement médicamenteux/statistiques et données numériques , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/traitement médicamenteux , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle
10.
J Pregnancy ; 2024: 1758662, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961858

RÉSUMÉ

Congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) is a major concern in India and highlights the multifaceted challenges posed by the Zika virus (ZIKV). The alarming increase in CZS cases in India, a condition that has serious effects on both public health and newborns, has raised concerns. This review highlights the importance of raising concern and awareness and taking preventive measures by studying the epidemiology, clinical symptoms, and potential long-term consequences of CZS. The review also contributes to worldwide research and information sharing to improve the understanding and prevention of CZS. As India deals with the changing nature of CZS, this thorough review is an important tool for policymakers, health workers, and researchers to understand what is happening now, plan for what to do in the future, and work together as a team, using medical knowledge, community involvement, and study projects to protect newborns' health and reduce the public health impact of these syndromes.


Sujet(s)
Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , Infection par le virus Zika , Humains , Infection par le virus Zika/épidémiologie , Infection par le virus Zika/congénital , Infection par le virus Zika/prévention et contrôle , Infection par le virus Zika/complications , Inde/épidémiologie , Grossesse , Nouveau-né , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/épidémiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Virus Zika , Microcéphalie/épidémiologie , Microcéphalie/virologie , Microcéphalie/étiologie
11.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 186(26)2024 Jun 24.
Article de Danois | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38953689

RÉSUMÉ

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease in neonates occurs in two forms: early-onset disease (EOD), (day 0-6), and late-onset disease (LOD), (day 7-90). This review investigates that risk-based intrapartum screening and antibiotics have reduced the incidence of EOD, but not LOD, in Denmark. No clinical or laboratory tests can rule out GBS disease at symptom onset. Thus, a high proportion of uninfected infants receive antibiotics, although this varies widely, and may be reduced by strategies of antibiotic stewardship. A future GBS vaccine for pregnant women may potentially reduce disease burden and antibiotic exposure.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , Infections à streptocoques , Streptococcus agalactiae , Humains , Infections à streptocoques/diagnostic , Infections à streptocoques/prévention et contrôle , Infections à streptocoques/traitement médicamenteux , Nouveau-né , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolement et purification , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Antibactériens/administration et posologie , Femelle , Grossesse , Danemark/épidémiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/diagnostic , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/microbiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/traitement médicamenteux , Nourrisson , Vaccins antistreptococciques/administration et posologie , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse/prévention et contrôle
13.
Semin Perinatol ; 48(4): 151923, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960750

RÉSUMÉ

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated persistent health inequities in perinatal populations, resulting in disparities of maternal and fetal complications. In this narrative review, we present an adapted conceptual framework of perinatal social determinants of health in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and use this framework to contextualize the literature regarding disparities in COVID-19 vaccination and infection. We synthesize how elements of the structural context, individual socioeconomic position, and concrete intermediary determinants influence each other and perinatal COVID-19 vaccination and infection, arguing that systemic inequities at each level contribute to observed disparities in perinatal health outcomes. From there, we identify gaps in the literature, propose mechanisms for observed disparities, and conclude with a discussion of strategies to mitigate them.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Disparités d'accès aux soins , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Humains , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Grossesse , Femelle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Déterminants sociaux de la santé , Nouveau-né , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Soins périnatals/méthodes , Disparités de l'état de santé
14.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 461, 2024 Jul 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965486

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Maternal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization is influenced by many factors but results are inconsistent. Consideration of antenatal risk factors may help inform decision making on GBS microbiological culture screening where universal screening is not standard of care. We sought to identify independent predictors of GBS colonization at 34-37 weeks gestation incorporating vaginal symptoms, perineal hygiene measures, sexual activity, and a potential novel factor, constipation. METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 573 women at 34-37 weeks gestation had an ano-vaginal swab taken and sent for selective culture for GBS. Women were asked about vaginal bleeding, discharge, irritation and candidiasis, antibiotic use during pregnancy, ano-vaginal hygiene practices such as douching and perineal cleansing after toileting, sexual intercourse related activities, and a potential novel factor for GBS carriage, constipation. Maternal basic demographics and obstetric-related characteristics were also collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify associates of GBS colonization. All variables with p < 0.05 found on bivariate analysis were then included into a model for multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for GBS colonization. RESULTS: GBS colonization was found in 235/573 (41.0%) of participants. Twenty six independent variables were considered for bivariate analysis. Eight were found to have p < 0.05. Following adjusted analysis, six independent predictors of GBS colonization were identified: ethnicity, previous neonatal GBS prophylaxis, antenatal vaginal irritation, antibiotic use, recent panty liner use, and frequency of sexual intercourse. Vaginal discharge and perineal cleansing were not associated after adjustment. Recent douching and constipation were not associated on bivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The identification of independent predictors of GBS colonization in late pregnancy may inform the woman and care provider in their shared decision making for microbiological screening at 35-38 weeks gestation in locations where universal GBS screening is not standard of care. ETHICS OVERSIGHT: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) on August 9, 2022, reference number 2022328-11120.


Sujet(s)
Constipation , Hygiène , Périnée , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , Comportement sexuel , Infections à streptocoques , Streptococcus agalactiae , Vagin , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Études prospectives , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolement et purification , Adulte , Constipation/microbiologie , Constipation/prévention et contrôle , Vagin/microbiologie , Études transversales , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/microbiologie , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/diagnostic , Infections à streptocoques/prévention et contrôle , Infections à streptocoques/diagnostic , Périnée/microbiologie , Périnée/traumatismes , Facteurs de risque , Canal anal/microbiologie , Troisième trimestre de grossesse
16.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 144, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933429

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction: the provision of essential preconception care services for HIV-positive pregnant women is crucial to prevent HIV transmission to infants. This includes pregnancy intention screening services, adequate viral load monitoring and suppression before conception, and necessary nutritional support. In Nyeri County, the prevalence of Mother-to-Child Transmission (MTCT) of HIV is 5.3%, which is higher than the global threshold of 5%. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pre-conception care services in preventing HIV transmission to infants in Nyeri County. The study objectives are to assess the utilization of pre-conception care services among HIV-positive women, specifically focusing on pregnancy intention screening, viral load monitoring and suppression, and access to nutritional assessment services before pregnancy. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the relationship between the provision of pre-conception care services and infant HIV outcomes. Methods: this cross-sectional retrospective descriptive study employed stratified sampling to select eight level 4 and level 5 hospitals in Nyeri County. The target population consisted of HIV-infected women seeking postnatal care in these facilities, with a sample size of 252 women who had HIV-exposed infants under two years old and were receiving post-natal care at the respective hospitals. Sociodemographic characteristics, including age, marital status, and education level, were collected. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: our findings revealed that only 34.2% of HIV-positive women seeking postnatal care had received information or services related to pregnancy intention screening, a crucial aspect of pre-conception care. Almost half (46.4%) of the women who participated in the study had undergone viral load measurements before pregnancy, which is another critical component of preconception care. Additionally, 85.6% of these women had received nutritional services during pregnancy from their healthcare providers. Interestingly, all women who received any pre-conception care services reported that their infants were alive and tested HIV-negative. Conclusion: preconception care is crucial in preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Efforts should be made to ensure that all HIV-infected women planning to conceive have access to preconception care services.


Sujet(s)
Infections à VIH , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse , Prise en charge préconceptionnelle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , Charge virale , Humains , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Infections à VIH/transmission , Infections à VIH/prévention et contrôle , Grossesse , Adulte , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Études transversales , Études rétrospectives , Jeune adulte , Nouveau-né , Nourrisson , Dépistage de masse/méthodes , Adolescent , Prise en charge postnatale , Prévalence , Issue de la grossesse
17.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1653, 2024 Jun 20.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902766

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Acute HIV infection during pregnancy and in the postpartum period increases the risk of vertical transmission. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended preexposure prophylaxis for pregnant and postpartum women at risk of acquiring HIV. However, there are significant gaps between the actual practice and the ideal goal of preexposure prophylaxis implementation among pregnant and postpartum women. Therefore, it is important to determine what influences women's implementation of preexposure prophylaxis during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. This review aims to aggregate barriers and facilitators to preexposure prophylaxis implementation among pregnant and postpartum women. METHODS: A range of electronic databases, including PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched for potentially relevant qualitative studies. The search period extended from the establishment of the databases to March 16, 2023. This review used the ENTREQ (Enhancing transparency in reporting of qualitative research synthesis) statement to guide the design and reporting of qualitative synthesis. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. The JBI meta-aggregation method was applied for guiding the data extraction, and the JBI ConQual method was applied for guiding the evaluation of the level of evidence for the synthesis. RESULTS: Of retrieved 2042 studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The total population sample included 447 participants, including 231 pregnant and postpartum women, 21 male partners, 75 healthcare providers (HCPs)/healthcare workers (HCWs), 18 policymakers, 37 mothers, and 65 women of childbearing age. A total of 149 findings with credibility ratings of "unequivocal" or "equivocal" were included in this meta-synthesis. Barriers and facilitators to preexposure prophylaxis implementation were coded into seven categories, including three facilitator categories: perceived benefits, maintaining relationships with partners, and external support, and four barriers: medication-related barriers, stigma, barriers at the level of providers and facilities, and biases in risk perception. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-synthesis aggregated the barriers and facilitators of preexposure prophylaxis implementation among pregnant and postpartum women. We aggregated several barriers to maternal preexposure prophylaxis implementation, including medication-related factors, stigma, barriers at the level of providers and facilities, and risk perception biases. Therefore, intervention measures for improving preexposure prophylaxis services can be developed based on these points. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42023412631.


Sujet(s)
Infections à VIH , Période du postpartum , Prophylaxie pré-exposition , Recherche qualitative , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Infections à VIH/prévention et contrôle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Agents antiVIH/administration et posologie , Agents antiVIH/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Acceptation des soins par les patients/psychologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse/prévention et contrôle
19.
Semin Perinatol ; 48(4): 151918, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38876935

RÉSUMÉ

The COVID-19 pandemic required perinatal clinicians to address the individual medical needs of the pregnant person and the fetus as well as the interdependent considerations of the maternal/newborn dyad. Regional, national and international collaborative groups utilized existing structures and in some cases, formed new partnerships to rapidly collect perinatal information. The urgent need to care for at-risk and infected pregnant persons required these groups to develop practical approaches to collect the data needed to safely inform practice. Here we will summarize the findings of five collaborative studies that leveraged differing methods to inform perinatal pandemic care.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Soins périnatals , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse , SARS-CoV-2 , Femelle , Humains , Nouveau-né , Grossesse , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Transmission verticale de maladie infectieuse/prévention et contrôle , Pandémies , Soins périnatals/méthodes , Soins périnatals/organisation et administration , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle
20.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2368944, 2024 Dec 31.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932738

RÉSUMÉ

This study aimed to assess the attitudes and willingness of pregnant women to receive the influenza vaccine and the factors influencing their decisions. A sample survey was conducted among pregnant women receiving prenatal care at various medical institutions in Minhang District, Shanghai, from March to June 2023. The survey included inquiries about demographic information, knowledge, and perception of influenza disease and influenza vaccine. Logistic regression models and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. 6.9% (78/1125) of participants considered receiving the influenza vaccine during pregnancy. Participants with graduate education or above (OR = 4.632, 95%CI: 1.046-20.517), non-office workers (OR = 2.784, 95%CI: 1.560-4.970), and participants whose spouses were not office workers (OR = 0.518, 95% CI: 0.294-0.913) were significantly associated with high intent to vaccinate. Participants with superior knowledge (>30 points) exhibited greater willingness (p < .001). Participants who viewed post-influenza symptoms as mild had a significantly lower willingness to vaccinate during pregnancy (2.3%), compared to those who disagreed (p = .015). Conversely, those recognizing a heightened risk of hospitalization due to respiratory diseases in pregnant women post-influenza were significantly more inclined to vaccinate during pregnancy (8.8%) (p = .007). Participants recognizing benefits uniformly expressed willingness to receive the influenza vaccine during pregnancy (p < .001), while those perceiving barriers uniformly rejected vaccination (p < .001). Higher education, non-office worker status, and having an office worker spouse correlate with greater willingness to receive the influenza vaccine during pregnancy. Enhanced knowledge and accurate perceptions of influenza and its vaccine influenced willingness. Accumulating knowledge about influenza and its vaccine fosters accurate perceptions. Notably, overall willingness to vaccinate during pregnancy remains low, likely due to safety concerns, and lack of accurate perceptions. Targeted health education, improved communication between healthcare providers and pregnant women, and campaigns highlighting vaccine benefits for mothers and children are essential.


Sujet(s)
Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé , Vaccins antigrippaux , Grippe humaine , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Femmes enceintes , Vaccination , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Chine , Adulte , Vaccins antigrippaux/administration et posologie , Grippe humaine/prévention et contrôle , Femmes enceintes/psychologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/psychologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Vaccination/psychologie , Vaccination/statistiques et données numériques , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Complications infectieuses de la grossesse/psychologie , Prise en charge prénatale , Études transversales , Adolescent
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...