Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency General Surgery Outcomes Among Older Adult Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Racial and ethnic disparities in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients have been well described in the literature. Nonetheless, the burden of these disparities, specifically within the more vulnerable older adult population, is relatively unknown. This study aims to investigate racial and ethnic disparities in clinical outcomes among older adult patients undergoing EGS. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from 2013 to 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database. EGS patients aged 65 y or older were included. Patients were categorized based on their self-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcomes evaluated were in-hospital mortality, 30-d mortality, and overall morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between race/ethnicity and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for relevant factors including age, comorbidities, functional status, preoperative conditions, and surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 54,132 patients were included, of whom 79.8% identified as non-Hispanic White, 9.5% as non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 5.8% as Hispanic, and 4.2% as non-Hispanic Asian. After risk adjustment, compared to non-Hispanic White patients, NHB, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic patients had decreased odds of 30-d mortality. For 30-d readmission and reoperation, differences among groups were comparable. However, NHB patients had significantly increased odds of overall morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.26; P < 0.001) and postoperative complications including sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and unplanned intubation. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower odds of postoperative myocardial infarction and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adult patients undergoing emergency general surgery, minority patients experienced higher morbidity rates, but paradoxical disparities in mortality were detected. Further research is necessary to identify the cause of these disparities and develop targeted interventions to eliminate them.

Racial and ethnic disparities in reception of muscle flap closure during oncologic spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities persist in surgical outcomes after spine surgery for primary and metastatic cancers. Muscle flap closure of spinal defects after oncologic resection has been shown to reduce wound complication rate with favorable cost-effectiveness. It is currently unknown whether racial disparities may affect the reception of this treatment. METHODS: Spinal surgery procedures for tumor resection and subsequent reconstruction were identified in the 2011-2022 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. Cases were propensity score matched for covariates like age, comorbidities, number of vertebral levels reconstructed, and length of stay to isolate the predictive impact of race on reception of muscle flap closure (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 9467 patients who underwent oncologic spine surgery and had known race and ethnicity were identified in the final cohort. Two hundred thirty-two (2.5%) cases included muscle flap closure during the index surgery. After matching (n = 4196), minority race/ethnicity was associated with lower rates of muscle flap closure (2.2%) than non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity (3.8%) (p = 0.0037). Upon weighted univariate logistic regression, minority racial and ethnic identification also predicted lower likelihood of muscle flap closure (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.52-0.63, p < 0.001). Among patients who received muscle flap closure, the overall rate of all major or minor thirty-day postoperative complications was not different depending on race and ethnicity (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are evident racial disparities in the reception of muscle flap closure after oncologic spine surgery. Further work may investigate the role of intersecting socioeconomic factors like insurance status and hospital characteristics. LAY SUMMARY: Muscle flap closure is a surgical technique within plastic surgery that has been associated with lower rates of complications after spine surgery to remove tumors. Our study shows that minority racial and ethnic groups are less likely on average to receive muscle flap closure.

Early postoperative outcomes following bariatric surgery in the United States: Are racial disparities improving?

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery offers effective treatment for morbid obesity and associated medical comorbidities, with excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Although it has been well documented that racial minority bariatric patients have worse outcomes than White patients, it remains unclear whether this recognition has led to improvement. Herein, we assess recent trends in bariatric surgery among Black and White patients and compare early postoperative outcomes by race. METHODS: Primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients from 2015 to 2021 reported to the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program were studied. Bariatric patients were stratified by race (Black and White) and perioperative outcomes were compared between matched Black and White patients. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmissions, hospital length of stay (LOS), reoperation, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Overall, there were 193,071 Black and 645,224 White primary bariatric patients, with a higher volume of SG and RGYB performed among White patients. A total of 219,566 Black and White bariatric patients were matched and included in the case-control. Black patients were found to have higher rates of 30-day mortality (0.02% vs. 0.01%; p = 0.03) and readmissions (3.68% vs. 2.65%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in LOS, reoperations, or overall postoperative complications. However, there was a higher postoperative pulmonary thromboembolism rate (0.16% vs 0.08%; p < 0.001).). The differences in perioperative outcomes stratified by race persisted over the study period (Fig. 1). CONCLUSION: Black bariatric surgery patients continue to have worse perioperative outcomes compared with their White counterparts. Further work must be done to determine contributing factors in order to effect improvement in outcomes in bariatric surgical care for racial minority patients.

Race, Ethnicity, and Pediatric Postsurgical Mortality: Current Trends and Future Projections.

BACKGROUND: No study has contextualized the aggregate human costs attributable to disparities in pediatric postsurgical mortalities in the United States, a critical step needed to convey the scale of racial inequalities to clinicians, policymakers, and the public. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study of 673 677 children from US hospitals undergoing intermediate to high-risk surgery between 2000 and 2019. We estimated the excess deaths that could be avoided if Black and Hispanic children had comparable mortality rates to white children. We estimated the mortality reduction required to eliminate disparities within the next decade. We finally evaluated the impact of policy changes targeting a modest annual 2.5% reduction in disparity-attributable mortality. RESULTS: During 2000 to 2019, risk-adjusted postoperative mortality trended consistently higher for both Black (adjusted RR [aRR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.49) and Hispanic children (aRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.17-1.27) than for white children. These disparity gaps were driven by higher mortality in Black and Hispanic children receiving surgery in nonteaching hospitals (Black versus white aRR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.38-1.93; Hispanic versus white aRR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.33-1.70). There were 4700 excess deaths among Black children and 5500 among Hispanic children, representing. 10 200 (average: 536 per year) excess deaths among minoritized children. Policy changes achieving an annual 2.5% reduction in postoperative mortality would prevent approximately 1100 deaths among Black children in the next decade. CONCLUSIONS: By exploring the solution, and not just the problem, our study provides a framework to reduce disparities in pediatric postoperative mortality over the next decade.

Racial and Ethnic Variations in Patients Undergoing Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Prior investigations assessing the impact of race/ethnicity on outcomes after mitral valve (MV) surgery have reported conflicting findings. This analysis aimed to examine the association between race/ethnicity and operative presentation and outcomes of patients undergoing MV and tricuspid valve (TV) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5984 patients (2730 female, median age 63 y) who underwent MV (n = 4,534, 76%), TV (n = 474, 8%) or both MV and TV (n = 976, 16%) surgery in a statewide collaborative from 2012 to 2021. The influence of race/ethnicity on preoperative characteristics, MV and TV repair rates, and postoperative outcomes was assessed for White (n = 4,244, 71%), Black (n = 1,271, 21%), Hispanic (n = 144, 2%), Asian (n = 171, 3%), and mixed/other race (n = 154, 3%) patients. RESULTS: Black patients, compared to White patients, had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of morbidity/mortality (24.5% versus 13.1%; P < 0.001) and more comorbid conditions. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo an elective procedure (White 71%, Black 55%, Hispanic 58%; P < 0.001). Degenerative MV disease was more prevalent in White patients (White 62%, Black 41%, Hispanic 43%, Asian 51%, mixed/other 45%; P < 0.05), while rheumatic disease was more prevalent in non-White patients (Asian 28%, Hispanic 26%, mixed/other 25%, Black 17%, White 10%;P < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, repair rates and adverse postoperative outcomes, including mortality, did not differ by racial/ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Patient race/ethnicity is associated with a higher burden of comorbidities at operative presentation and MV disease etiology. Strategies to improve early detection of valvular heart disease and timely referral for surgery may improve outcomes.

Caprini guideline indicated venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among inpatient surgical patients: are there racial/ethnic differences in practice patterns and outcomes?

BACKGROUND: While racial disparity in surgical mortality due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) has improved, a gap persists. Our study aim was to determine differences in VTE prevention practices and their impact on outcomes among racial surgical cohorts. METHODS: Elective surgeries performed between 1.1.2016 and 5.31.2021 were included. Racial/ethnic cohorts were propensity-matched 1:1 to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, and outcomes were compared using unadjusted logistic regression. Match cohort balance was assessed using absolute standardized mean differences and linear model analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pearson's Chi-square tests evaluated bi-variate associations. Conditional logistic regression to compare outcomes between matched groups. Odds ratios, 95 â€‹% confidence intervals, and p-values are reported. Analyses were performed using R version 4.1.2 and the R package Matchit. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic other race (NHOR) (vs. NHW) patients were less likely to receive inpatient prophylaxis (OR 0.86, CI:0.76-0.98). Appropriate prophylaxis resulted in similar VTE for NHB (p â€‹= â€‹0.71) and Hispanic (p â€‹= â€‹0.06), compared to NHW patients. Inpatient bleeding was higher in Hispanic patients with a higher likelihood of receiving appropriate prophylaxis (OR 1.94, CI:1.16-3.32) and NHOR patients with a lower likelihood (OR 1.90, CI:1.10-3.36) CONCLUSION: Postoperative VTE was similar for minority patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis, compared to NHW patients. Inpatient bleeding was more likely in Hispanic and NHOR patients but may not be related to receiving appropriate prophylaxis. NHOR patients were less likely to receive inpatient thromboprophylaxis.

Persistent Racial Disparities in Morbidity Following Major Elective Operations.

Introduction: Despite considerable national attention, racial disparities in surgical outcomes persist. We sought to consider whether race-based inequities in outcomes following major elective surgery have improved in the contemporary era. Methods: All adult hospitalization records for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement were tabulated from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified by Black or White race. To consider the evolution in outcomes, we included an interaction term between race and year. We designated centers in the top quartile of annual procedural volume as high-volume hospitals (HVH). Results: Of ∼2,838,485 patients, 245,405 (8.6%) were of Black race. Following risk-adjustment, Black race was linked with similar odds of in-hospital mortality, but increased likelihood of major complications (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.41, 95%Confidence Interval [CI] 1.36-1.47). From 2016-2020, overall risk-adjusted rates of major complications declined (patients of White race: 9.2% to 8.4%; patients of Black race 11.8% to 10.8%, both P < .001). Yet, the delta in risk of adverse outcomes between patients of White and Black race did not significantly change. Of the cohort, 158,060 (8.4%) were treated at HVH. Following adjustment, Black race remained associated with greater odds of morbidity (AOR 1.37, CI 1.23-1.52; Ref:White). The race-based difference in risk of complications at HVH did not significantly change from 2016 to 2020. Conclusion: While overall rates of complications following major elective procedures declined from 2016 to 2020, patients of Black race faced persistently greater risk of adverse outcomes. Novel interventions are needed to address persistent racial disparities and ensure acceptable outcomes for all patients.

Identifying Population-Level and Within-Hospital Disparities in Surgical Care.

BACKGROUND: The lack of consensus on equity measurement and its incorporation into quality-assessment programs at the hospital and system levels may be a barrier to addressing disparities in surgical care. This study aimed to identify population-level and within-hospital differences in the quality of surgical care provision. STUDY DESIGN: The analysis included 657 NSQIP participating hospitals with more than 4 million patients (2014 to 2018). Multilevel random slope, random intercept modeling was used to examine for population-level and in-hospital disparities. Disparities in surgical care by Area Deprivation Index (ADI), race, and ethnicity were analyzed for 5 measures: all-case inpatient mortality, all-case urgent readmission, all-case postoperative surgical site infection, colectomy mortality, and spine surgery complications. RESULTS: Population-level disparities were identified across all measures by ADI, 2 measures for Black race (all-case readmissions and spine surgery complications), and none for Hispanic ethnicity. Disparities remained significant in the adjusted models. Before risk adjustment, in all measures examined, within-hospital disparities were detected in: 25.8% to 99.8% of hospitals for ADI, 0% to 6.1% of hospitals for Black race, and 0% to 0.8% of hospitals for Hispanic ethnicity. After risk adjustment, in all measures examined, less than 1.1% of hospitals demonstrated disparities by ADI, race, or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: After risk adjustment, very few hospitals demonstrated significant disparities in care. Disparities were more frequently detected by ADI than by race and ethnicity. The lack of substantial in-hospital disparities may be due to the use of postoperative metrics, small sample sizes, the risk adjustment methodology, and healthcare segregation. Further work should examine surgical access and healthcare segregation.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes Following Surgical Fixation of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A National Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess race as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications after surgical fixation of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures for African American and Asian American patients compared with White patients. METHODS: The 2011-2021 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to identify patients undergoing fusion surgeries for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Patient comorbidity burden was assessed using a modified 5-item frailty index score (mFI-5). Chi-squared and ANOVA tests were used to compare baseline clinical characteristics between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare African American and Asian American patients with White patients controlling for age, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. RESULTS: African American patients experienced longer operative times compared to Asian American and White patients (3.74 ± 1.87 hours vs. 3.04 ± 1.71 hours and 3.48 ± 1.81 hours, P < 0.001). African American and Asian American patients demonstrated higher comorbidity burden with mFI-5>2 compared to White patients (30.7% and 25.6% vs. 19.9%, P < 0.001). African American and Asian American patients had a higher risk of postoperative complications than White patients (22.4% and 20% vs. 19.7%, P < 0.001). African American race was an independent risk factor of postoperative 30-day morbidity (OR 1.19, CI 1.11-1.28, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: African American and Asian American patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion surgeries exhibit disproportionate comorbidity burden, longer LOS, and greater postoperative complications compared with White patients. Furthermore, the African American race was associated with an increased rate of 30-day postoperative complications.

Non-White Patients Have a Higher Risk of Stroke Following Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid artery revascularization has traditionally been performed by either a carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stent. Large data analysis has suggested there are differences in perioperative outcomes with regards to race, with non-White patients (NWP) having worse outcomes of stroke, restenosis and return to the operating room (RTOR). The introduction of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has started to shift the paradigm of carotid disease treatment. However, to date, there have been no studies assessing the difference in postoperative outcomes after TCAR between racial groups. METHODS: All patients from 2016 to 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent TCAR were included in our analysis. Patients were split into two groups based on race: individuals who identified as White and a second group that comprised all other races. Demographic and clinical variables were compared using Student's t-Test and chi-square test of independence. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of race on perioperative outcomes of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), death, restenosis, RTOR, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 22,609 patients: 20,424 (90.3%) White patients and 2185 (9.7%) NWP. After adjusting for sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, history of prior stroke or TIA, symptomatic status, and high-risk criteria at time of TCAR, there was a significant difference in postoperative stroke, with 63% increased risk in NWP (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.40, P = 0.014). However, we found no significant difference in the odds of MI, death, postoperative TIA, restenosis, or RTOR when comparing NWP to White patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that NWP have increased risk of stroke but similar outcomes of death, MI, RTOR and restenosis following TCAR. Future studies are needed to elucidate and address the underlying causes of racial disparity in carotid revascularization.

Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients Have Increased Complication Risks When Undergoing Surgery While Not Meeting Clinical Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have not been uniformly adopted in practice because research has suggested that they may foster inequities in surgical access, potentially disadvantaging minority sociodemographic groups. The aim of this study was to assess whether undergoing TJA without meeting clinical guidelines affects complication risk and leads to disparities in postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 11,611 adult patients who underwent primary TJA from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, at an academic hospital network. Based on self-reported race and ethnicity, 89.5% of patients were White, 3.5% were Black, 2.9% were Hispanic, 1.3% were Asian, and 2.8% were classified as other. Patients met institutional guidelines for undergoing TJA if they had a hemoglobin A1c of <8.0% and a body mass index of <40 kg/m 2 and were not currently smoking. A logistic regression model was utilized to identify factors associated with complications, and a mixed-effects model was utilized to identify factors associated with not meeting guidelines for undergoing TJA. RESULTS: During the study period, 11% (1,274) of the 11,611 adults who underwent primary TJA did not meet clinical guidelines. Compared with the group who met guidelines, the group who did not had higher proportions of Black patients (3.2% versus 6.0%; p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (2.7% versus 4.6%; p < 0.001). An increased risk of not meeting guidelines at the time of surgery was demonstrated among Black patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22 to 2.10]; p = 0.001) and patients insured by Medicaid (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.26 to 2.44]; p = 0.001) or Medicare (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.41]; p = 0.007). Patients who did not meet guidelines had a higher risk of reoperation than those who met guidelines (7.7% [98] versus 5.9% [615]; p = 0.017), including a higher risk of infection-related reoperation (3.1% [40] versus 1.4% [147]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients who underwent TJA despite not meeting institutional preoperative criteria had a higher risk of postoperative complications. These patients were more likely to be from racial and ethnic minority groups, to have a lower socioeconomic status, and to have Medicare or Medicaid insurance. These findings underscore the need for surgery-related shared decision-making that is informed by evidence-based guidelines in order to reduce complication burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Examining racial disparities in utilization rate and perioperative outcomes following knee and hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Previous arthroplasty utilization research predominantly examined Black and White populations within the US. This is the first known study to examine utilization and complications in poorly studied minority racial groups such as Asians and Native Hawaiian/Pacific-Islanders (NHPI) as compared to Whites. RESULTS: Data from 3304 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients (2011 to 2019) were retrospectively collected, involving 1789 Asians (52.2%), 1164 Whites (34%) and 320 Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (NHPI) (9.3%). The 2012 arthroplasty utilization rates for Asian, White, and NHPI increased by 32.5%, 11.2%, and 86.5%, respectively, by 2019. Compared to Asians, Whites more often underwent hip arthroplasty compared to knee arthroplasty (odds ratio (OR) 1.755; p < 0.001). Compared to Asians, Whites and NHPI more often received total knee compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (White: OR 1.499; NHPI: OR 2.013; p < 0.001). White patients had longer hospitalizations (2.66 days) compared to Asians (2.19 days) (p = 0.005) following bilateral procedures. Medicare was the most common insurance for Asians (66.2%) and Whites (54.2%) while private insurance was most common for NHPI (49.4%). Compared to Asians, economic status was higher for Whites (White OR 0.695; p < 0.001) but lower for NHPI (OR 1.456; p < 0.001). After controlling for bilateral procedures, NHPI had a lower risk of transfusion compared to Asians (OR 0.478; p < 0.001) and Whites had increased risk of wound or systemic complications compared to Asians (OR 2.086; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Despite NHPI demonstrating a significantly poorer health profile and lower socioeconomic status, contrary to previous literature involving minority racial groups, no significant overall differences in arthroplasty utilization rates or perioperative complications could be demonstrated amongst the racial groups examined.

Quality of Life After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Women.

Importance: Higher lymphedema rates after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) have been found in Black and Hispanic women; however, there is poor correlation between subjective symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and measured lymphedema. Additionally, racial and ethnic differences in QOL have been understudied. Objective: To evaluate the association of race and ethnicity with long-term QOL in patients with breast cancer treated with ALND. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study enrolled women aged 18 years and older with breast cancer who underwent unilateral ALND at a tertiary cancer center between November 2016 and March 2020. Preoperatively and at 6-month intervals, arm volume was measured by perometer and QOL was assessed using the Upper Limb Lymphedema-27 (ULL-27) questionnaire, a validated tool for assessing lymphedema that evaluates how arm symptoms affect physical, psychological, and social functioning. Data were analyzed from November 2016 to October 2023. Exposures: Breast surgery and unilateral ALND in the primary setting or after sentinel lymph node biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Scores in each domain of the ULL-27 were compared by race and ethnicity. Factors impacting QOL were identified using multivariable regression analyses. Results: The study included 281 women (median [IQR] age, 48 [41-58] years) with breast cancer who underwent unilateral ALND and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Of these, 30 patients (11%) self-identified as Asian individuals, 57 (20%) as Black individuals, 23 (8%) as Hispanic individuals, and 162 (58%) as White individuals; 9 individuals (3%) who did not identify as part of a particular group or who were missing race and ethnicity data were categorized as having unknown race and ethnicity. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2.97 (1.96-3.67) years. The overall 2-year lymphedema rate was 20% and was higher among Black (31%) and Hispanic (27%) women compared with Asian (15%) and White (17%) women (P = .04). Subjective arm swelling was more common among Asian (57%), Black (70%), and Hispanic (87%) women than White (44%) women (P < .001), and lower physical QOL scores were reported by racial and ethnic minority women at nearly every follow-up. For example, at 24 months, median QOL scores were 87, 79, and 80 for Asian, Black, and Hispanic women compared with 92 for White women (P = .003). On multivariable analysis, Asian race (ß = -5.7; 95% CI, -9.5 to -1.8), Hispanic ethnicity (ß = -10.0; 95% CI, -15.0 to -5.2), and having Medicaid (ß = -5.4; 95% CI, -9.2 to -1.7) or Medicare insurance (ß = -6.9; 95% CI, -10.0 to -3.4) were independently associated with worse physical QOL (all P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that Asian, Black, and Hispanic women experience more subjective arm swelling after unilateral ALND for breast cancer compared with White women. Black and Hispanic women had higher rates of objective lymphedema than their White counterparts. Both minority status and public medical insurance were associated with worse physical QOL. Understanding disparities in QOL after ALND is an unmet need and may enable targeted interventions to improve QOL for these patients.

Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity and Loss of Post-Surgery Independent Living: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Bronx Hospital Network.

BACKGROUND: Black race is associated with postoperative adverse discharge to a nursing facility, but the effects of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are unclear. We explored the Hispanic paradox , described as improved health outcomes among Hispanic/Latino patients on postoperative adverse discharge to nursing facility. METHODS: A total of 93,356 adults who underwent surgery and were admitted from home to Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, New York, between January 2016 and June 2021 were included. The association between self-identified Hispanic/Latino ethnicity and the primary outcome, postoperative adverse discharge to a nursing home or skilled nursing facility, was investigated. Interaction analysis was used to examine the impact of socioeconomic status, determined by estimated median household income and insurance status, on the primary association. Mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the proportion of variance attributed to the patient's residential area defined by zip code and self-identified ethnicity. RESULTS: Approximately 45.9% (42,832) of patients identified as Hispanic/Latino ethnicity and 9.7% (9074) patients experienced postoperative adverse discharge. Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was associated with lower risk of adverse discharge (relative risk [RR adj ] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 00.82-0.94; P < .001), indicating a Hispanic Paradox . This effect was modified by the patient's socioeconomic status ( P -for-interaction <.001). Among patients with a high socioeconomic status, the Hispanic paradox was abolished (RR adj 1.10; 95% CI, 11.00-1.20; P = .035). Furthermore, within patients of low socioeconomic status, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative discharge home with health services compared to non-Hispanic/Latino patients (RR adj 1.06; 95% CI, 11.01-1.12; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic/Latino ethnicity is a protective factor for postoperative adverse discharge, but this association is modified by socioeconomic status. Future studies should focus on postoperative discharge disposition and socioeconomic barriers in patients with Hispanic/Latino ethnicity.

Racial Disparities in Treatment and Outcomes of Patients With Hepatitis C Undergoing Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: African Americans have the highest prevalence of chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Racial disparities in outcome are observed after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study sought to identify if disparities in treatments and outcomes exist between Black and White patients who have HCV prior to elective THA and TKA. METHODS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, HCV characteristics, perioperative variables, in-hospital outcomes, and postoperative complications at 1-year follow-up were collected and compared between the 2 races. Patients who have preoperative positive viral load (PVL) and undetectable viral load were identified. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, while 2-tailed Student's Kruskal-Wallis t-tests were used for continuous variables. A P value of less than .05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: The liver function parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase and model for end-stage liver disease scores, were all higher preoperatively in Black patients undergoing THA (P = .01; P < .001) and TKA (P = .03; P = .003), respectively. Black patients were more likely to undergo THA (65.8% versus 35.6%; P = .002) and TKA (72.1% versus 37.3%; 0.009) without receiving prior treatment for HCV. Consequently, Black patients had higher rates of preoperative PVL compared to White patients in both THA (66% versus 38%, P = .006) and TKA (72% versus 37%, P < .001) groups. Black patients had a longer length of stay for both THA (3.7 versus 3.3; P = .008) and TKA (4.1 versus 3.0; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The HCV treatment prior to THA and TKA with undetectable viral load has been shown to be a key factor in mitigating postoperative complications, including joint infection. We noted that Black patients were more likely to undergo joint arthroplasty who did not receive treatment and with a PVL. While PVL rates decreased over time for both races, a significant gap persists for Black patients.

Race and Ethnicity Independently Predict Adverse Outcomes Following Head and Neck Autograft Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: There is growing attention toward the implications of race and ethnicity on health disparities within otolaryngology. While race is an established predictor of adverse head and neck oncologic outcomes, there is paucity in the literature on studies employing national, multi-institutional data to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on head and neck autograft surgery. METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, trends in 30 days outcomes were assessed. Patients with ICD-10 codes for malignant head and neck neoplasms were isolated. Autograft surgeries were selected using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for free flap and pedicled flap reconstruction. Primary outcomes included surgical complications, reoperation, readmission, extended length of stay and operation time. Each binary categorical variable was compared to racial/ethnic identity via binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 2447 patients who underwent head and neck autograft surgery (80.71% free flap reconstruction and 19.39% pedicled flap reconstruction). Black patients had significantly higher odds of overall surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.091, 2.298, p = 0.016) with much higher odds of perioperative blood transfusions (OR 2.291, 95% CI 1.532, 3.426, p = <.001). Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo reoperation within 30 days after surgery and were more likely to be hospitalized for more than 30 days post-operatively (OR 1.566, 95% CI 1.015, 2.418, p = 0.043 and OR 12.224, 95% CI 2.698, 55.377, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity serve as independent predictors of complications in the post-operative period following head and neck autograft surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3595-3603, 2024.

The impact of gender, race, and ethnicity on bariatric surgery outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The rates of postoperative complications can vary among specific patient populations. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to examine how gender, race, and ethnicity can affect short-term postoperative complications in bariatric surgery patients. SETTING: United States. METHODS: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery between the years 2016 and 2021 were included and stratified based on gender, race/ethnicity, and procedure type. The 30-day outcomes were assessed using Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of III-V. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to compare continuous variables among groups and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to examine the effects of gender, race/ethnicity on CD classification ≥ III complications by the procedure type. RESULTS: A total of 975,642 bariatric surgery patients were included. Descriptive univariate analysis showed that CD ≥ III complications were higher among non-Hispanic blacks (NHB) and lowest in Hispanic patients, regardless of their gender, except in the duodenal switch DS group, where non-Hispanic whites (NHW) had the lowest complication rate. There was no difference between male and female patients with regards to postoperative complications, except in the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) group, where NHW males had more complications than NHW females. Sleeve gastrectomy showed the lowest complication rates followed by gastric bypass and DS in all groups. In multivariate logistic regression model, for both females and males NHBs had higher odds of postoperative complications compared to NHWs in sleeve gastrectomy (Female aOR:1.31, 95% CI: [1.23-1.40]; Male aOR:1.24, 95% CI: [1.08-1.43], P < .001) and gastric bypass (Female aOR:1.24, 95% CI: [1.16-1.33]; Male aOR:1.25, 95% CI: [1.06-1.48], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic Black patients are at a higher rate of developing CD ≥ III complications compared to non-Hispanic Whites after bariatric surgery. The male gender was not a significant risk factor for serious postoperative complications. Among the different types of bariatric procedures, sleeve gastrectomy has the lowest rates of severe complications, followed by gastric bypass and duodenal switch. These results highlight the significance of considering gender, race, ethnicity, and procedure type during preoperative evaluation, surgical planning, and postoperative care.

Postoperative racial disparities following spine surgery are less pronounced in the outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Racial disparities in spine surgery have been thoroughly documented in the inpatient (IP) setting. However, despite an increasing proportion of procedures being performed as same-day surgeries, whether similar differences have developed in the outpatient (OP) setting remains to be elucidated. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate racial differences in postoperative outcomes between Black and White patients following OP and IP lumbar and cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent IP or OP microdiscectomy, laminectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR) between 2017 and 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day rates of serious and minor adverse events, readmission, reoperation, nonhome discharge, and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent IP or OP microdiscectomy, laminectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR) between 2017 and 2021 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Disparities between Black and White patients in (1) adverse event rates, (2) readmission rates, (3) reoperation rates, (4) nonhome discharge rates, (5) mortality rates, (6) operative times, and (7) hospital LOS between Black and White patients were measured and compared between IP and OP surgical settings. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential effects of baseline demographic and clinical differences. RESULTS: Of 81,696 total surgeries, 49,351 (60.4%) were performed as IP and 32,345 (39.6%) were performed as OP procedures. White patients accounted for a greater proportion of IP (88.2% vs 11.8%) and OP (92.7% vs 7.3%) procedures than Black patients. Following IP surgery, Black patients experienced greater odds of serious (OR 1.214, 95% CI 1.077-1.370, p=.002) and minor adverse events (OR 1.377, 95% CI 1.113-1.705, p=.003), readmission (OR 1.284, 95% CI 1.130-1.459, p<.001), reoperation (OR 1.194, 95% CI 1.013-1.407, p=.035), and nonhome discharge (OR 2.304, 95% CI 2.101-2.528, p<.001) after baseline adjustment. Disparities were less prominent in the OP setting, as Black patients exhibited greater odds of readmission (OR 1.341, 95% CI 1.036-1.735, p=.026) but were no more likely than White patients to experience adverse events, reoperation, individual complications, nonhome discharge, or death (p>.050 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Racial inequality in postoperative complications following spine surgery is evident, however disparities in complication rates are relatively less following OP compared to IP procedures. Further work may be beneficial in elucidating the causes of these differences to better understand and mitigate overall racial disparities within the inpatient setting. These decreased differences may also provide promising indication that progress towards reducing inequality is possible as spine care transitions to the OP setting.

Associations between race and ethnicity and perioperative outcomes among women undergoing hysterectomy for adenomyosis.

OBJECTIVE: To study racial and ethnic disparities among women undergoing hysterectomy performed for adenomyosis across the United States. DESIGN: A cohort study. SETTING: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2012-2020. PATIENTS: Patients with an adenomyosis diagnosis. INTERVENTION: Hysterectomy for adenomyosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th editions codes 617.0 and N80.0 (endometriosis of the uterus). Hysterectomies were classified on the basis of the Current Procedural Terminology codes. We compared baseline and surgical characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications across the different racial and ethnic groups. Postoperative complications were classified into minor and major complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: A total of 12,599 women underwent hysterectomy for adenomyosis during the study period: 8,822 (70.0%) non-Hispanic White, 1,597 (12.7%) Hispanic, 1,378 (10.9%) non-Hispanic Black or African American, 614 (4.9%) Asian, 97 (0.8%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and 91 (0.7%) American Indian or Alaska Native. Postoperative complications occurred in 8.8% of cases (n = 1,104), including major complications in 3.1% (n = 385). After adjusting for confounders, non-Hispanic Black race and ethnicity were independently associated with an increased risk of major complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] {1.16-2.04}). Laparotomy was performed in 13.7% (n = 1,725) of cases. Compared with non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, the adjusted odd ratios for undergoing laparoscopy were 0.58 (95% CI 0.50-0.67) for Hispanic, 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.65) for non-Hispanic Black or African American, 0.33 (95% CI 0.27-0.40) for Asian, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.41) for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Among women undergoing hysterectomy for postoperatively diagnosed adenomyosis, non-Hispanic Black or African American race and ethnicity were associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications. Compared with non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Hispanic Black or African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity were less likely to undergo minimally invasive surgery.

Asian Americans have higher 30-day surgical complications after esophagectomy: A propensity-score matched study from ACS-NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Despite Asian Americans having a heightened risk profile for esophageal cancer, racial disparities within this group have not been investigated. This study seeks to evaluate the 30-day postoperative outcomes for Asian Americans following esophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using ACS-NSQIP esophagectomy targeted database 2016-2021. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was applied to Asian Americans and Caucasians who underwent esophagectomy to compare their 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: There were 229 Asian Americans and 5303 Caucasians identified. Asian Americans were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma. After matching, 687 Caucasians were included. Asian Americans had higher pulmonary complications (22.27 â€‹% vs 16.01 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.04) especially pneumonia (16.59 â€‹% vs 11.06 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.04), renal dysfunction (2.62 â€‹% vs 0.44 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.01) especially progressive renal insufficiency (1.31 â€‹% vs 0.15 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.05), and bleeding events (18.34 â€‹% vs 9.02 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.01). In addition, Asian Americans had longer LOS (11.83 â€‹± â€‹9.39 vs 10.23 â€‹± â€‹7.34 days, p â€‹= â€‹0.03). CONCLUSION: Asian Americans were found to face higher 30-day surgical complications following esophagectomy. Continued investigation into the underlying causes and potential mitigation strategies for these disparities are needed.