Whole genome sequencing analysis of seven unknown resistance mechanisms of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam.

AIMS: To investigate alternative resistance mechanisms among seven ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA)-resistant carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) strains lacking common antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) using whole genome sequencing. METHODS AND RESULTS: ARG and virulence factors (VFs) were screened using the ARG database CARD and the VF database, respectively, and identified using genomic annotation data with BLAST+. Six strains were ST11 sequence types (STs), and one was ST2123. ST11 strains harbored more ARGs than the ST2123 strains. All seven strains carried multiple ARGs with efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance, including oqxA, oqxB, tet (A), qacEdltal, CRP, H-NS, Kpn-E, F, G, H, acrA, LptD, acrB, acrD, cpxA, mdtB, and mdtC. These efflux-mediated ARGs were identified in most strains and even all strains. Whole genome sequencing revealed that the ST11 strain carried multiple potential prophages, genomic islands, and integrative and conjugative elements, while the ST2123 strain carried an independent potential prophages and a genomic island. CONCLUSIONS: Whole genome sequencing analysis revealed that these seven CZA-resistant CRKP strains lacking common ARGs exhibited efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance-associated ARGs. The main mechanism by which CRKP resists CZA is antibiotic inactivation. Except for tet (A), no ARGs and validation experiments related to efflux were found. This study's results provide a new possibility for the resistance mechanism of CRKP to CZA, and we will verify this conclusion through experiments in the future.

Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance is associated with PER-3-producing ST309 lineage in Chilean clinical isolates of non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Introduction: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is indicated against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly those that are carbapenem resistant. CZA resistance in P. aeruginosa producing PER, a class A extended-spectrum ß-lactamase, has been well documented in vitro. However, data regarding clinical isolates are scarce. Our aim was to analyze the contribution of PER to CZA resistance in non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates that were ceftazidime and/or carbapenem non-susceptible. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined through agar dilution and broth microdilution, while bla PER gene was screened through PCR. All PER-positive isolates and five PER-negative isolates were analyzed through Whole Genome Sequencing. The mutational resistome associated to CZA resistance was determined through sequence analysis of genes coding for PBPs 1b, 3 and 4, MexAB-OprM regulators MexZ, MexR, NalC and NalD, AmpC regulators AmpD and AmpR, and OprD porin. Loss of bla PER-3 gene was induced in a PER-positive isolate by successive passages at 43°C without antibiotics. Results: Twenty-six of 287 isolates studied (9.1%) were CZA-resistant. Thirteen of 26 CZA-resistant isolates (50%) carried bla PER. One isolate carried bla PER but was CZA-susceptible. PER-producing isolates had significantly higher MICs for CZA, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, meropenem and ciprofloxacin than non-PER-producing isolates. All PER-producing isolates were ST309 and their bla PER-3 gene was associated to ISCR1, an insertion sequence known to mobilize adjacent DNA. PER-negative isolates were classified as ST41, ST235 (two isolates), ST395 and ST253. PER-negative isolates carried genes for narrow-spectrum ß-lactamases and the mutational resistome showed that all isolates had one major alteration in at least one of the genes analyzed. Loss of bla PER-3 gene restored susceptibility to CZA, ceftolozane/tazobactam and other ß-lactamsin the in vitro evolved isolate. Discussion: PER-3-producing ST309 P. aeruginosa is a successful multidrug-resistant clone with blaPER-3 gene implicated in resistance to CZA and other ß-lactams.

Efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and plazomicin on carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have become a major public health problem worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and plazomicin on carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates. Susceptibility of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, ceftazidime/avibactam and plazomicin was investigated by broth-microdilution method. Major carbapenemases NDM, VIM, IMP, KPC, OXA-48 as well as other ß-lactamases namely, TEM, SHV, OXA-1-like, CTX-M, ACC, FOX, MOX, DHA, CIT, EBC, VEB, GES, PER were investigated by PCR. A total of 120 carbapenem-resistant isolates (60 E. coli and 60 K. pneumoniae) were included in this study and blaOXA-48-like was found in 78.33%, blaNDM in 26.66%, blaKPC in 7.5%, blaIMP in 5.83%, and blaVIM in 5%. Among 94 isolates with the blaOXA-48-like gene, 22.3% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and 51.1% were resistant to plazomicin. Of 32 isolates with blaNDM, 31 (96.9%) were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and 30 (93.75%) were resistant to plazomicin, and both antibiotics had limited effects against blaNDM carriers (P < 0.001). Of the 12 isolates with blaNDM+OXA-48 combination, 11 (91.7%) were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and plazomicin. The effect of both antibiotics was significantly lower in strains with blaNDM+OXA-48 combination (P < 0.005).The most common carbapenemase genes in this study were blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM. Ceftazidime/avibactam demonstrated a good efficacy among OXA-48 producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli, however, plazomicin had a significantly lower antibacterial effect in our study. Both antimicrobial agents should be considered as an option by evaluating combined susceptibility results and gene patterns obtained by regional and global molecular data in the treatment of CRE infections.

Molecular mechanisms responsible KPC-135-mediated resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in ST11-K47 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance attributable to the blaKPC-2 gene mutation is increasingly documented in clinical settings. In this study, we characterized the mechanisms leading to the development of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in ST11-K47 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae that harboured the blaKPC-135 gene. This strain possessed fimbriae and biofilm, demonstrating pathogenicity. Compared with the wild-type KPC-2 carbapenemase, the novel KPC-135 enzyme exhibited a deletion of Glu168 and Leu169 and a 15-amino acid tandem repeat between Val262 and Ala276. The blaKPC-135 gene was located within the Tn6296 transposon truncated by IS26 and carried on an IncFII/IncR-type plasmid. Compared to the blaKPC-2-positive cloned strain, only the MIC of ceftazidime increased against blaKPC-135-positive K. pneumoniae and wasn't inhibited by avibactam (MIC 32 µg/mL), while clavulanic acid and vaborbactam demonstrated some inhibition. Kinetic parameters revealed that KPC-135 exhibited a lower Km and kcat/Km with ceftazidime and carbapenems, and a higher (∼26-fold) 50% inhibitory concentration with avibactam compared to KPC-2. The KPC-135 enzyme exerted a detrimental effect on fitness relative to the wild-type strain. Furthermore, this strain possessed hypervirulent determinants, which included the IncHI1B/FIB plasmid with rmpA2 and expression of type 1 and 3 fimbriae. In conclusion, we reported a novel KPC variant, KPC-135, in a clinical ST11-K47 hypervirulent K. pneumoniae strain, which conferred ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, possibly through increased ceftazidime affinity and decreased avibactam susceptibility. This strain simultaneously harboured resistance and virulence genes, posing an elevated challenge in clinical treatment.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam resistance in clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A phenotypic and genotypic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To find the prevalence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in clinical isolates and to determine the genes responsible for Ceftazidime-Avibactam resistance using PCR. METHODS: A total of 89 carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from various clinical samples were included in the study. CAZ-AVI resistance was tested using E-test. CAZ-AVI resistant strains were subjected to conventional PCR for detection of carbapenamase genes blaNDM- 1, blaOXA-48, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaKPC. RESULTS: Of the 89 isolates screened for CAZ-AVI resistance, 45(50.5%) isolates were found to be resistant. 42 isolates were subjected to PCR for detection of ß lactamase genes.34 isolates were positive for blaNDM-1 and all 42 isolates were positive for blaOXA-48. Co-expression of NDM-1 and OXA-48 was seen in 34 isolates. Sensitivity of mCIM test to identify a carbapenamse compared to PCR was 61.9%. Sensitivity of eCIM test to identify NDM-1 was 80%. CONCLUSION: CAZ-AVI was effective in vitro in 49.4% of the isolates. Indicating that CAZ-AVI is a promising addition to antibiotics against CRE as well as a carbapenem sparing drug in ESBL producing organisms. ß-Lactamase-related mutations are the main mechanism leading to CAZ-AVI resistance.

Effect of ceftazidime-avibactam combined with different antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

This study aimed to assess the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with various antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). We selected 59 clinical CRKP isolates containing distinct drug resistance mechanisms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), eravacycline (ERA), amikacin (AK), fosfomycin (FOS), and aztreonam (ATM), both individually and in combination with CZA, were tested using the checkerboard method. The interactions of antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). The time-kill curve assay was employed to dynamically evaluate the effects of these drugs alone and in combination format. In the checkerboard assay, the combination of CZA+MEM showed the highest level of synergistic effect against both KPC-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, with synergy rates of 91.3% and 100%, respectively. Following closely was the combination of FOS+CZA . For metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing strains, ATM+CZA displayed complete synergy, while the combination of MEM+CZA showed a synergy rate of only 57.14% for NDM-producing strains and 91.67% for IMP-producing strains. In the time-kill assay, MEM+CZA also demonstrated significant synergistic effects against the two KPC-2-producing isolates (Y070 and L70), the two carbapenemase-non-producing isolates (Y083 and L093), and the NDM-1-producing strain L13, with reductions in log10 CFU/mL exceeding 10 compared to the control. Against the IMP-producing strain Y047, ATM+CZA exhibited the highest synergistic effect, resulting in a log10 CFU/mL reduction of 10.43 compared to the control. The combination of CZA and MEM exhibited good synergistic effects against KPC-producing and non-enzyme-producing strains, followed by the FOS+CZA combination. Among MBL-producing strains, ATM+CZA demonstrated the most pronounced synergistic effect. However, the combinations of CZA with ERA, AK, and COL show irrelevant effects against the tested clinical isolates. IMPORTANCE: Our study confirmed the efficacy of the combination CZA+MEM against KPC-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing strains. For metalloenzyme-producing strains, CZA+ATM demonstrated the most significant synergy. Additionally, CZA exhibited a notable synergy effect when combined with FOS. These combination therapies present promising new options for the treatment of CRKP infection.

Loss and gain of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in a non-carbapenemase-producing K1-ST23 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at revealing the underlying mechanisms of the loss and gain of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in a non-carbapenemase-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp). METHODS: Here we longitudinally recovered 3 non-carbapenemase-producing K1-ST23 hvKp strains at a one-month interval (KP29105, KP29499 and KP30086) from an elderly male. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole genome sequencing, transcriptomic sequencing, gene cloning, plasmid conjugation, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) were conducted. RESULTS: Among the 3 hvKp strains, KP29105 was resistant to the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, KP29499 acquired resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems, while KP30086 restored its susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem and meropenem but retained low-level resistance to ertapenem. KP29105 and KP29499 carried plasmid-encoded genes blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-71, respectively, but KP30086 lost both. Cloning of gene blaCTX-M-71 and conjugation experiment of blaCTX-M-71-carrying plasmid showed that the transformant and transconjugant were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam but had a more than 8-fold increase in MICs. Supplementation with an outer membrane permeabilizer could reduce the MIC of ceftazidime-avibactam by 32 folds, indicating that porins play a key role in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. The OmpK35 of the 3 isolates was not expressed, and the OmpK36 of KP29499 and KP30086 had a novel amino acid substitution (L359R). SDS-PAGE and qRT-PCR showed that the expression of porin OmpK36 of KP29499 and KP30086 was significantly down-regulated compared with KP29105. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we reported the rare ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a non-carbapenemase-producing hvKp strain. Resistance plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-71 and mutated OmpK36 had a synergetic effect on the resistance.

Evaluation of a simple method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy in New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales.

NDM-producing carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections became a challenge for clinicians. Combination therapy of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam is a prudent choice for these infections. However, there is still no recommendation of a practically feasible method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy. We proposed a simple method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy and compared it with reference broth micro-dilution and other methods. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates were screened for the presence of the NDM gene by the Carba R test. NDM harbouring isolates were tested for aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy by broth microdilution (reference method), E strip-disc diffusion, double disc diffusion, and disc replacement methods. In the newly proposed method, the MHA medium was supplemented with ceftazidime-avibactam (corresponding to an aztreonam concentration of 4µg/ml). The MHA medium was then inoculated with the standard inoculum (0.5 McFarland) of the test organism. An AZT disc (30 µg) was placed on the supplemented MHA medium, and the medium was incubated overnight at 37°C. Aztreonam zone diameter on the supplemented MHA medium (in the presence of ceftazidime-avibactam) was compared with that from a standard disc diffusion plate (without ceftazidime-avibactam), performed in parallel. Interpretation of synergy was based on the restoration of aztreonam zone diameter (in the presence of ceftazidime-avibactam) crossing the CLSI susceptibility breakpoint, i.e., ≥ 21 mm. Of 37 carbapenem-resistant NDM-producing isolates, 35 (94.6%) were resistant to aztreonam and tested synergy positive by the proposed method. Its sensitivity and specificity were 97.14% and 100%, respectively. Cohen's kappa value showed substantial agreement of the reference method with the proposed method (κ = 0.78) but no other methods. The proposed method is simple, easily interpretable, and showed excellent sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with the reference method. Therefore, the new method is feasible and reliable for testing aztreonam synergy with avibactam in NDM-producing Enterobacterales.

In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the blaKPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo blaKPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the blaKPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and blaKPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various blaKPC-2 variants, including blaKPC-25, blaKPC-127, blaKPC-100, blaKPC-128, blaKPC-137, blaKPC-138, blaKPC-144 and blaKPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased blaKPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as blaKPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the blaKPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a blaKPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from blaKPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The blaKPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to blaKPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

First report of KPC variants conferring ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Colombia: introducing KPC-197.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants is increasing worldwide. We characterized two CZA-resistant clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae strains by antimicrobial susceptibility test, conjugation assays, and WGS. Isolates belonged to ST258 and ST45, and produced a KPC-31 and a novel variant KPC-197, respectively. The novel KPC variant presents a deletion of two amino acids on the Ω-loop (del_168-169_EL) and an insertion of two amino acids in position 274 (Ins_274_DS). Continued surveillance of KPC variants conferring CZA resistance in Colombia is warranted. IMPORTANCE: Latin America and the Caribbean is an endemic region for carbapenemases. Increasingly high rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) have established ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) as an essential antimicrobial for the treatment of infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although other countries in the region have reported the emergence of CZA-resistant KPC variants, this is the first description of such enzymes in Colombia. This finding warrants active surveillance, as dissemination of these variants could have devastating public health consequences.

Emergence of aztreonam/avibactam and tigecycline-resistant Pseudomonas putida group Co-producing blaIMP-1, blaAFM-4 and blaOXA-1041 with a novel sequence type ST268 in Southwestern China.

OBJECTIVES: The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas putida (CRPP) has raised public awareness. This study investigated two strains from the Pseudomonas putida group that were resistant to carbapenem, tigecycline, and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), with a focus on their microbial and genomic characteristics. METHODS: We assessed the antibiotic resistance profile using broth dilution, disk diffusion, and E-test methods. Efflux pump phenotype testing and real-time quantitative PCR were employed to evaluate efflux pump activity in tigecycline resistance, while polymerase chain reaction was utilized to detect common carbapenem genes. Additionally, whole-genome sequencing was performed to analyze genomic characteristics. The transferability of blaIMP-1 and blaAFM-4 was assessed through a conjugation experiment. Furthermore, growth kinetics and biofilm formation were examined using growth curves and crystal violet staining. RESULTS: Both strains demonstrated resistance to carbapenem, tigecycline, and ATM-AVI. Notably, NMP can restore sensitivity to tigecycline. Subsequent analysis revealed that they co-produced blaIMP-1, blaAFM-4, tmexCD-toprJ, and blaOXA-1041, belonging to a novel sequence type ST268. Although they were closely related on the phylogenetic tree, they exhibited different levels of virulence. Genetic environment analysis indicated variations compared to prior studies, particularly regarding the blaIMP-1 and blaAFM-4 genes, which showed limited horizontal transferability. Moreover, it was observed that temperature exerted a specific influence on their biological factors. CONCLUSION: We initially identified two P. putida ST268 strains co-producing blaIMP-1, blaAFM-4, blaOXA-1041, and tmexCD-toprJ. The resistance to tigecycline and ATM-AVI can be attributed to the presence of multiple drug resistance determinants. These findings underscore the significance of P. putida as a reservoir for novel antibiotic resistance genes. Therefore, it is imperative to develop alternative antibiotic therapies and establish effective monitoring of bacterial resistance.

Using host-mimicking conditions and a murine cutaneous abscess model to identify synergistic antibiotic combinations effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Antibiotic drug combination therapy is critical for the successful treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant pathogens. We investigated the efficacy of ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics, against the hypervirulent, ceftazidime/avibactam resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Liverpool epidemic strain (LES) B58. Although minimum inhibitory concentrations in vitro differed by up to eighty-fold between standard and host-mimicking media, combinatorial effects only marginally changed between conditions for some combinations. Effective combinations in vitro were further tested in a chronic, high-density murine infection model. Colistin and azithromycin demonstrated combinatorial effects with ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam both in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, while tobramycin and tigecycline exhibited strong synergy in vitro, this effect was not observed in vivo. Our approach of using host-mimicking conditions and a sophisticated animal model to evaluate drug synergy against bacterial pathogens represents a promising approach. This methodology may offer insights into the prediction of combination therapy outcomes and the identification of potential treatment failures.

Comparison of testing methods assessing the in vitro efficacy of the combination of aztreonam with avibactam on multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

BACKGROUND: Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) combination shows promising effectiveness on most carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives, yet standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methods for evaluating the combination in clinical laboratories is lacking. We aimed to evaluate different ATM-AVI AST approaches. METHODS: 96 characterized carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates belonging to 9 Enterobacterales (EB; n = 80) and P. aeruginosa (PA; n = 16) species, including 90 carbapenemase producers and 72 strains resistant to both CAZ-AVI and ATM, were tested. Paper disk elution (DE; Bio-Rad) and E-test gradient strips stacking (SS; bioMérieux) were performed for the ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. MIC Test Strip (MTS; Liofilchem) was evaluated for ATM-AVI MIC determination. Results were interpreted applying ATM clinical breakpoints of the EUCAST guidelines and compared to the broth microdilution method (Sensititre, Thermofisher). RESULTS: According to broth microdilution method, 93% of EB and 69% of PA were tested susceptible to ATM-AVI. The synergistic effect of ATM-AVI was of 95% for EB, but of only 17% for PA. The MTS method yielded higher categorical and essential agreement (CA/EA) rates for both EB (89%/91%) and PA (94%/94%) compared to SS, where the rates were 87%/83% for EB and 81%/81% for PA. MTS and SS yielded 2 and 3 major discrepancies, respectively, while 3 very major discrepancies each were observed for both methods. Concerning the DE method, CA reached 91% for EB and 81% for PA, but high number of very major discrepancies were observed for EB (n = 6; 8%) and for PA (n = 3; 19%). CONCLUSIONS: The ATM-AVI association displayed excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant clinical Enterobacterales strains. MTS method offers accurate ATM-AVI AST results, while the SS method might serve as better alternative then DE method in assessing the efficacy of ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. However, further investigation is needed to confirm the methods' ability to detect ATM-AVI resistance.

In vitro antibacterial activity of sulbactam-durlobactam in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex.

Combinations of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam-durlobactam and seventeen antimicrobial agents were tested against strains of Acinetobacter baumannii in checkerboard assays. Most combinations resulted in indifference with no instances of antagonism. These results suggest sulbactam-durlobactam antibacterial activity against A. baumannii is unlikely to be affected if co-dosed with other antimicrobial agents.

Durlobactam, a Diazabicyclooctane ß-Lactamase Inhibitor, Inhibits BlaC and Peptidoglycan Transpeptidases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Peptidoglycan synthesis is an underutilized drug target in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs) are a class of broad-spectrum ß-lactamase inhibitors that also inhibit certain peptidoglycan transpeptidases that are important in mycobacterial cell wall synthesis. We evaluated the DBO durlobactam as an inhibitor of BlaC, the Mtb ß-lactamase, and multiple Mtb peptidoglycan transpeptidases (PonA1, LdtMt1, LdtMt2, LdtMt3, and LdtMt5). Timed electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) captured acyl-enzyme complexes with BlaC and all transpeptidases except LdtMt5. Inhibition kinetics demonstrated durlobactam was a potent and efficient DBO inhibitor of BlaC (KI app 9.2 ± 0.9 µM, k2/K 5600 ± 560 M-1 s-1) and similar to clavulanate (KI app 3.3 ± 0.6 µM, k2/K 8400 ± 840 M-1 s-1); however, durlobactam had a lower turnover number (tn = kcat/kinact) than clavulanate (1 and 8, respectively). KI app values with durlobactam and clavulanate were similar for peptidoglycan transpeptidases, but ESI-MS captured durlobactam complexes at more time points. Molecular docking and simulation demonstrated several productive interactions of durlobactam in the active sites of BlaC, PonA1, and LdtMt2. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted on 11 Mtb isolates with amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, imipenem, clavulanate, and durlobactam. Durlobactam had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 0.5-16 µg/mL, similar to the ranges for meropenem (1-32 µg/mL) and imipenem (0.5-64 µg/mL). In ß-lactam + durlobactam combinations (1:1 mass/volume), MICs were lowered 4- to 64-fold for all isolates except one with meropenem-durlobactam. This work supports further exploration of novel ß-lactamase inhibitors that target BlaC and Mtb peptidoglycan transpeptidases.

Genomic characterization of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST307 revealed multiple introductions in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: To describe at genomic level nine carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST307 (Kp-ST307) clinical isolates recovered in Buenos Aires during 2017 to 2021, investigating their resistome, virulome, and phylogeny. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Intitute (CLSI). Genomic DNA was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq and analysed using SPAdes, PROKKA, and Kleborate. Phylogeny of 355 randomly selected Kp-ST307 genomes and those from nine local isolates was inferred by a maximum-likelihood approach. The tree was visualized using Microreact. RESULTS: Besides resistance to ß-lactams and fluoroquinolones, six out of nine Kp-ST307 were also resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA). This difficult-to-treat resvistance phenotype was mediated by blaSHV-28 and GyrA-83I/ParC-80I mutations in addition to carbapenemase coding genes. Among CZA susceptible isolates, two of them harboured blaKPC-3 while the other harboured blaKPC-2+blaCTX-M-15. Regarding CZA-resistant isolates, three harboured blaKPC-3+blaNDM-1+blaCMY-6, two carried blaKPC-2+blaNDM-5+blaCTX-M-15, and blaNDM-5+blaCTX-M-15 were detected in the remaining isolate. Furthermore, five colistin-resistant isolates presented a nonsense mutation in mgrB. Global Kp-ST307 isolates were distributed in two deep-branching lineages while local isolates were set in the main clade of the phylogenetic tree. The five isolates from the same hospital, harbouring blaKPC-3 or blaKPC-3+blaNDM-1+blaCMY-6, clustered in a monophyletic subclade with Italian isolates. Also, an isolate harbouring blaKPC-2+blaNDM-5+blaCTX-M-15 recovered in another hospital was closed to this group. The remaining local Kp-ST307 were grouped in other subclades containing isolates of diverse geographical origin. CONCLUSION: The inferred resistome was consistent with the resistant phenotype. Phylogeny suggested multiple introduction events in our region and a single major introduction in one hospital followed by local spread.

Real-world evaluation of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam across US medical centres.

We assessed 160 patients who received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for ≥2 days. At treatment initiation, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5, 45% were in the intensive care unit, and 19% required vasopressor support. The in-hospital mortality rate was 24%. These data advance our understanding of real-world indications and outcomes of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam use.

A novel KPC-166 in ceftazidime/avibactam resistant ST307 Klebsiella pneumoniae causing an outbreak in intensive care COVID Unit, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Aim of the study was the molecular characterization of 21 ceftazidime/avibactam resistant (CZA-R) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, collected in the period October 2021-March 2022 from an Intensive Care COVID Unit in a Northern Italian Hospital. METHODS: After growth on selective/chromogenic culture media and susceptibility tests assessment, resistance genes content was ascertained for all the isolates by the HybriSpot 12 multiplexing, PCR and Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Clonality was assessed by PFGE and MLST according to the Pasteur scheme. A SNPs-based phylogenetic tree was obtained comparing representative isolates and global genomes. The blaKPC gene horizontal transmission was evaluated by conjugation experiments. blaKPC-166 was cloned in a pCR2.1 vector and transformed in chemically competent TOP10 cells. RESULTS: Sixteen inpatients resulted positive for colonization and/or infection by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains. The 21 CZA-R KPC-Kp isolates obtained showed MDR phenotype; susceptibility to meropenem was always retained. All the CZA-R KPC-Kp presented a novel blaKPC variant, named blaKPC-166, showing a single nucleotide substitution (T811C) compared to the blaKPC-94; but related to blaKPC-2. TWO DIFFERENT PULSOTYPES WERE DETECTED: A in 18/21 and B in 1/21 cases, two strains from the same patient being untypable by PFGE. Interestingly, the outbreak was sustained by the high-risk clone ST307, although the ST22, ST6342, ST6418 and ST6811 have also been identified and associated to KPC-166. Worryingly, blaKPC-166 could be transferred horizontally and, after cloning, it conferred resistance to CZA. DISCUSSION: This novel variant confers CZA-resistance and carbapenems susceptibility restoration. As KPC-166 was found expressed by multiple Kp clones, greater efforts should be made to prevent the further dissemination of such strains in Italian clinical settings.

Performance of disk diffusion method for aztreonam in combination with avibactam against Enterobacteriales.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of an in-house developed disk diffusion method for aztreonam in combination with avibactam against Enterobacteriales. METHODS: The in vitro antibacterial activity of aztreonam with avibactam against 204 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales was determined by a disk diffusion method, with a broth microdilution method as a reference. RESULTS: The optimal S/R breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of 30/20 and 10/4 µg disks, calculated by the dBETs software using the model-based approaches, were ≥22/≤21 and ≥12/≤11 mm, respectively. On the basis of the estimated breakpoints, the CAs for disk diffusion tests of 30/20 and 10/4 µg aztreonam/avibactam disks were both 98.0%, with 0.5% major error and 37.5% very major error. CONCLUSIONS: The home-made disk diffusion method is an economical and practical method for clinical microbiology laboratories to determine the antibacterial susceptibility of aztreonam with avibactam against Enterobacteriales.