RÉSUMÉ
Patients with chronic and serious illnesses experience significant quality of life concerns. More research is needed to understand the impact of financial burden on patients with COPD, heart failure, and kidney failure. Patients with COPD, heart failure, or kidney failure completed a cross-sectional online survey using validated measures of financial burden (general financial strain as well as financial toxicity attributable to treatment), physical quality of life (symptom burden and perceived health), and emotional quality of life (anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation). ANCOVA was used to examine whether financial strain and financial toxicity were associated with physical and emotional quality of life, while accounting for key covariates. Among 225 participants with COPD (n = 137), heart failure (n = 48), or kidney failure (n = 40), 62.2% reported general financial strain, with 34.7% experiencing financial toxicity attributable to treatments. Additionally, 68.9% rated their health as fair or poor, experiencing significant symptom burden including fatigue, dyspnea, and chest pain. Participants also reported clinically relevant levels of anxiety (55.1%), depression (52.0%), and suicidal ideation (21.8%). In the total sample, financial strain was associated with worse physical and emotional quality of life on all measures (all Ps < .001). Financial toxicity attributable to treatment was not associated with quality of life in the total sample or subsamples. Patients with COPD, heart failure, and kidney failure face significant financial, physical, and emotional burdens. Financial strain appears to undermine physical and emotional quality of life. Our study highlights the demand for interventions aimed at mitigating financial strain and toxicity experienced by individuals with chronic illnesses.
Sujet(s)
Coûts indirects de la maladie , Défaillance cardiaque , Broncho-pneumopathie chronique obstructive , Qualité de vie , Insuffisance rénale , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/psychologie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Mâle , Femelle , Broncho-pneumopathie chronique obstructive/économie , Broncho-pneumopathie chronique obstructive/psychologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Études transversales , Insuffisance rénale/psychologie , Insuffisance rénale/économie , Dépression/psychologie , Dépression/économie , Anxiété/psychologie , Émotions , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Idéation suicidaire , Stress financier/psychologieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Although prior research has estimated the overarching cost burden of heart failure (HF), a thorough analysis examining medical expense differences and trends, specifically among commercially insured patients with heart failure, is still lacking. Thus, the study aims to examine historical trends and differences in medical costs for commercially insured heart failure patients in the United States from 2006 to 2021. METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional analysis of medical and pharmacy claims data (IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academic) from 2006 to 2021 was conducted. The cohort included adult patients (age > = 18) who were enrolled in commercial insurance plans and had healthcare encounters with a primary diagnosis of HF. The primary outcome measures were the average total annual payment per patient and per cost categories encompassing hospitalization, surgery, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient care, post-discharge care, and medications. The sub-group measures included systolic, diastolic, and systolic combined with diastolic, age, gender, comorbidity, regions, states, insurance payment, and self-payment. RESULTS: The study included 422,289 commercially insured heart failure (HF) patients in the U.S. evaluated from 2006 to 2021. The average total annual cost per patient decreased overall from $9,636.99 to $8,201.89, with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of -1.11% (95% CI: -2% to -0.26%). Hospitalization and medication costs decreased with an AAPC of -1.99% (95% CI: -3.25% to -0.8%) and - 3.1% (95% CI: -6.86-0.69%). On the other hand, post-discharge, outpatient, ED visit, and surgery costs increased by an AAPC of 0.84% (95% CI: 0.12-1.49%), 4.31% (95% CI: 1.03-7.63%), 7.21% (95% CI: 6.44-8.12%), and 9.36% (95% CI: 8.61-10.19%). CONCLUSIONS: The study's findings reveal a rising trend in average total annual payments per patient from 2006 to 2015, followed by a subsequent decrease from 2016 to 2021. This decrease was attributed to the decline in average patient costs within the Medicare Cost insurance category after 2016, coinciding with the implementation of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015. Additionally, expenses related to surgical procedures, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient care have shown substantial growth over time. Moreover, significant differences across various variables have been identified.
Sujet(s)
Défaillance cardiaque , Assurance maladie , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/thérapie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , États-Unis , Mâle , Femelle , Études transversales , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Assurance maladie/économie , Assurance maladie/statistiques et données numériques , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Coûts des soins de santé/tendances , Examen des demandes de remboursement d'assurance , Hospitalisation/économie , Dépenses de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Dépenses de santé/tendancesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte abnormality with potentially life-threatening consequences. Published data have shown that potassium-binding polymer patiromer (Veltassa) is associated with reduced rates of severe edema and hospitalization for heart failure compared with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC, Lokelma) when treating hyperkalemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible costs associated with these interventions in the Spanish and UK settings. METHODS: A cost-analysis model was developed in Microsoft Excel to compare the costs associated with patiromer and SZC for the management of hyperkalemia. Clinical event rates were taken from a published real-world comparative study, with the base case capturing the statistically significant reduction in severe edema with patiromer vs SZC and a sensitivity analysis also including the non-statistically significant reduction in hospitalization for heart failure. Country-specific costs, expressed in 2022 Euros (EUR) and British pounds sterling (GBP), were evaluated from a healthcare payer perspective and included pharmacy costs and costs of clinical events. RESULTS: Patiromer may be associated with cost savings of EUR 107 and GBP 630 per patient-year of treatment vs SZC in Spain and the UK, respectively. The majority of cost savings were due to the possible lower daily cost of patiromer compared with SZC. Including the difference in heart failure hospitalization rates in a sensitivity analysis led to greater cost savings with patiromer over SZC, increasing to EUR 460 and GBP 902 in Spain and the UK, respectively. Extrapolation of patient-level economic outcomes to a population level found that patiromer was associated with annual cost savings of EUR 30.6 million in Spain, and GBP 801.7 million in the UK vs SZC. CONCLUSIONS: Patiromer has the potential to be cost saving vs SZC for the treatment of hyperkalemia in Spain and the UK based on the results of a real-world evidence analysis.
Sujet(s)
Hyperkaliémie , Polymères , Silicates , Hyperkaliémie/traitement médicamenteux , Hyperkaliémie/économie , Humains , Espagne , Royaume-Uni , Polymères/usage thérapeutique , Silicates/usage thérapeutique , Silicates/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Hospitalisation/économie , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Coûts et analyse des coûts , Modèles économétriquesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is among the leading causes of death in the United States. Further, patients hospitalized because of HF with comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) are at a significantly increased risk of death and rehospitalization. Results from the SOLOIST-WHF trial show that sotagliflozin lowered rates of readmission among hospitalized patients with HF and comorbid DM. However, it is unclear what the economic impact of the use of sotagliflozin would be on hospitals and health systems, particularly in an age where provider reimbursement is increasingly tied to value. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the 1-year financial impact on US provider health systems of adopting sotagliflozin relative to standard of care (SoC) across different alternative payment models. METHODS: This study created a 3-part decision tree model to quantify the financial impact of using sotagliflozin to treat patients hospitalized with HF in a US hospital setting. The model first estimated the clinical and economic outcomes of health systems with current SoC (no sotagliflozin) to treat US patients hospitalized for HF with comorbid DM. Then, using the results from the SOLOIST trial, the changes in clinical and economic outcomes with sotagliflozin adoption were modeled. Finally, the differences in health care utilization between sotagliflozin and SoC arms were translated to differences in health system reimbursement in the context of 3 common alternative payment models (APMs) in addition to the baseline fee-for-service (FFS) model: FFS with the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced program, and Accountable Care Organizations. RESULTS: A typical community hospital would have 83.4 patients per year on average with an index HF hospitalization with comorbid DM. The model predicted that sotagliflozin would reduce the probability of hospitalization, emergency department visits, and deaths by 29.3%, 38.5%, and 17.8%, respectively, compared with SoC. For hospitals not participating in APM programs, sotagliflozin resulted in a net loss of $92.94 per person ($7,754 per health system). Conversely, when accounting for provider health system participation in APMs, sotagliflozin adoption increased financial returns by $4,720 per person ($305,604 per health system) under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, $1,200 per person ($100,106 per health system) for the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced program, and $1,078 per person ($31,029 per health system) for Accountable Care Organizations. Based on the national average composition of APM reimbursement, sotagliflozin adoption resulted in a $1,576 increase in margin per patient with HF ($105,454 per health system). CONCLUSIONS: Although sotagliflozin adoption reduced health system revenue in an FFS payment model, it led to a net positive financial impact after accounting for APM bonus payments.
Sujet(s)
Hétérosides , Défaillance cardiaque , Modèles économiques , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , États-Unis , Hétérosides/usage thérapeutique , Hétérosides/économie , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/économie , Hospitalisation/économie , Diabète/traitement médicamenteux , Diabète/économie , Mécanismes de remboursement , Réadmission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Réadmission du patient/économieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: To quantify prevalence, harms, and NHS costs in England of problematic oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing in high risk groups. DESIGN: Population based cohort and economic modelling study. SETTING: Economic models estimating patient harm associated with NSAID specific hazardous prescribing events, and cost to the English NHS, over a 10 year period, were combined with trends of hazardous prescribing event to estimate national levels of patient harm and NHS costs. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were prescribed oral NSAIDs and were in five high risk groups: older adults (≥65 years) with no gastroprotection; people who concurrently took oral anticoagulants; or those with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or a history of peptic ulcer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of hazardous prescribing events, by each event and overall, discounted quality adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, and cost to the NHS in England of managing harm. RESULTS: QALY losses and cost increases were observed for each hazardous prescribing event (v no hazardous prescribing event). Mean QALYs per person were between 0.01 (95% credibility interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.02) lower with history of peptic ulcer, to 0.11 (0.04 to 0.19) lower with chronic kidney disease. Mean cost increases ranged from a non-statistically significant £14 (17; $18) (95% CI -£71 to £98) in heart failure, to a statistically significant £1097 (£236 to £2542) in people concurrently taking anticoagulants. Prevalence of hazardous prescribing events per 1000 patients ranged from 0.11 in people who have had a peptic ulcer to 1.70 in older adults. Nationally, the most common hazardous prescribing event (older adults with no gastroprotection) resulted in 1929 (1416 to 2452) QALYs lost, costing £2.46m (£0.65m to £4.68m). The greatest impact was in people concurrently taking oral anticoagulants: 2143 (894 to 4073) QALYs lost, costing £25.41m (£5.25m to £60.01m). Over 10 years, total QALYs lost were estimated to be 6335 (4471 to 8658) and an NHS cost for England of £31.43m (£9.28m to £67.11m). CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs continue to be a source of avoidable harm and healthcare cost in these five high risk populations, especially in inducing an acute event in people with chronic condition and people taking oral anticoagulants.
Sujet(s)
Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens , Modèles économiques , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Humains , Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/économie , Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/effets indésirables , Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/usage thérapeutique , Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/administration et posologie , Angleterre/épidémiologie , Sujet âgé , Mâle , Femelle , Administration par voie orale , Médecine d'État/économie , Études de cohortes , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Anticoagulants/économie , Anticoagulants/effets indésirables , Anticoagulants/usage thérapeutique , Anticoagulants/administration et posologie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/épidémiologie , Ulcère peptique/économie , Prescription inappropriée/économie , Prescription inappropriée/statistiques et données numériques , Insuffisance rénale chronique/économie , Insuffisance rénale chronique/épidémiologieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) has been revolutionary in improving outcomes of heart failure patients. However, with the addition of more medication classes, the annual cost of these medications on the US healthcare system needs further evaluation. OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate the trend of annual cost of GDMT from 2013 to 2021 using the Medicare-part D Database. METHODS: Using Medicare Part D database (2013-2021), we determined the number of beneficiaries receiving these drugs, the total number of 30-day fills for each medication, and the total annual spending on these medications. Linear regression was used to analyze data using Python Programming Language. P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The estimated annual Medicare- part D spending on empagliflozin had a 50 % increase in cost between 2020 and 2021, which could be attributed to its FDA approval for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Empagliflozin cost Medicare 3.73 billion USD in 2021 alone. In addition, sacubitril-valsartan had a strong trajectory since its introduction to the market in 2015. Since its approval in July 2015, it cost Medicare 4.51 billion USD. The Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist class was the least costly class of GDMT. CONCLUSION: The rise in the cost of GDMT is not proportionate amongst the different classes of GDMT. Newer classes of medications cast a significant cost on Medicare in recent years.
Sujet(s)
Défaillance cardiaque , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , États-Unis , Medicare part D (USA)/économie , Guides de bonnes pratiques cliniques comme sujet , Association médicamenteuse , Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/usage thérapeutique , Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/économie , Composés benzhydryliques/usage thérapeutique , Composés benzhydryliques/économie , Valsartan , Glucosides/usage thérapeutique , Glucosides/économie , Amino-butyrates/usage thérapeutique , Amino-butyrates/économie , Dérivés du biphényle/économie , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/économie , Coûts des médicaments , Bases de données factuelles , Antagonistes des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes/usage thérapeutique , Antagonistes des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes/économieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Three medications are now guideline-recommended treatments for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), however, the cost-effectiveness of these agents in combination has yet to be established. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in individuals with HFmrEF/HFpEF. METHODS: Using a 3-state Markov model, we performed a cost-effectiveness study using simulated cohorts of 1,000 patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Treatment with 1-, 2-, and 3-drug combinations was modeled. Based on a United States health care sector perspective, outcome data was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 United States dollars based on a 30-year time horizon. RESULTS: Treatment with MRA, MRA+SGLT2i, and MRA+SGLT2i+ARNI therapy resulted in an increase in life years of 1.04, 1.58, and 1.80 in the HFmrEF subgroup, respectively, and 0.99, 1.54, and 1.77 in the HFpEF subgroup, respectively, compared with placebo. At a yearly cost of $18, MRA therapy resulted in ICERs of $10,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in both subgroups. The ICER for the addition of SGLT2i therapy ($4,962 per year) was $113,000 per QALY in the HFmrEF subgroup and $141,000 in the HFpEF subgroup. The addition of ARNI therapy ($5,504 per year) resulted in ICERs >$250,000 per QALY in both subgroups. If SGLT2i and ARNI were available at generic pricing the ICERs become <$10,000 per QALY in both EF subgroups. Outcomes were highly sensitive to assumed benefit in cardiovascular death. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with heart failure, MRA was of high value, SGLT2i was of intermediate value, and ARNI was of low value in both HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups. For patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF increased use of MRA and SGLT2i therapies should be encouraged and be accompanied with efforts to lower the cost of SGLT2i and ARNI therapies.
Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Défaillance cardiaque , Antagonistes des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2 , Débit systolique , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/physiopathologie , Débit systolique/physiologie , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/économie , Antagonistes des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes/usage thérapeutique , Antagonistes des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes/économie , Mâle , Femelle , Sujet âgé , États-Unis , Chaines de Markov , Néprilysine/antagonistes et inhibiteurs , Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/usage thérapeutique , Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/économie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Association de médicamentsRÉSUMÉ
AIMS: We examine the effects of symptoms and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and healthcare costs in a European population with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EURObservational Research Programme on AF long-term general registry, AF patients from 250 centres in 27 European countries were enrolled and followed for 2 years. We used fixed effects models to estimate the association of symptoms and CVD events on HRQOL and annual healthcare costs. We found significant decrements in HRQOL in AF patients in whom ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [-0.075 (95% confidence interval -0.144, -0.006)], angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) [-0.037 (-0.071, -0.003)], new-onset/worsening heart failure [-0.064 (-0.088, -0.039)], bleeding events [-0.031 (-0.059, -0.003)], thromboembolic events [-0.071 (-0.115, -0.027)], mild symptoms [0.037 (-0.048, -0.026)], or severe/disabling symptoms [-0.090 (-0.108, -0.072)] occurred during the follow-up. During follow-up, annual healthcare costs were associated with an increase of 11 718 (8497, 14 939) in patients with STEMI, 5823 (4757, 6889) in patients with angina/NSTEMI, 3689 (3219, 4158) in patients with new-onset or worsening heart failure, 3792 (3315, 4270) in patients with bleeding events, and 3182 (2483, 3881) in patients with thromboembolic events, compared with AF patients without these events. Healthcare costs were primarily driven by inpatient costs. There were no significant differences in HRQOL or healthcare resource use between EU regions or by sex. CONCLUSION: Symptoms and CVD events are associated with a high burden on AF patients and healthcare systems throughout Europe.
Sujet(s)
Fibrillation auriculaire , Coûts des soins de santé , Qualité de vie , Enregistrements , Humains , Fibrillation auriculaire/économie , Fibrillation auriculaire/thérapie , Mâle , Femelle , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Europe , Sujet âgé , Études longitudinales , Adulte d'âge moyen , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/thérapie , Angine de poitrine/économie , Angine de poitrine/épidémiologie , Angine de poitrine/thérapie , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/économie , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/thérapie , Facteurs temps , Hémorragie/économie , Facteurs de risque , Hospitalisation/économieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding differences in cause-specific costs between heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% vs >40%, and potential cost implications of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare cause-specific health care costs following hospitalization for HF with EF ≤40% vs >40% and estimate the cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i therapy. METHODS: This study examined Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from 2016 to 2020. Mean per-patient total (excluding drug costs) and cause-specific costs from discharge through 1-year follow-up were calculated and compared between EF ≤40% vs >40%. Next, risk reductions on total all-cause and HF hospitalizations were estimated in a trial-level meta-analysis of 5 pivotal trials of SGLT2is in HF. Finally, these relative treatment effects were applied to Medicare beneficiaries eligible for SGLT2i therapy to estimate the projected cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i, excluding drug costs. RESULTS: Among 146,003 patients, 50,598 (34.7%) had EF ≤40% and 95,405 (65.3%) had EF >40%. Mean total cost through 1 year was $40,557. Total costs were similar between EF groups overall but were higher for EF ≤40% among patients surviving the 1-year follow-up period. Patients with EF >40% had higher costs caused by non-HF and noncardiovascular hospitalizations, and skilled nursing facilities (all P < 0.001). Trial-level meta-analysis of the 5 SGLT2i clinical trials estimated 11% (rate ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.93; P < 0.001) and 29% (rate ratio: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.76; P < 0.001) relative reductions in rates of total all-cause and HF hospitalizations, respectively, regardless of EF. Reductions in all-cause and HF hospitalizations were projected to reduce annual costs of readmission by $2,451 to $2,668 per patient with EF ≤40% and $1,439 to $2,410 per patient with EF >40%. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of older U.S. adults hospitalized for HF, cause-specific costs of care differed among patients with EF ≤40% vs >40%. SGLT2i significantly reduced the rate of HF and all-cause hospitalizations irrespective of EF in clinical trials, and implementation of SGLT2i therapy in clinical practice is projected to reduce costs by $1,439 to $2,668 per patient over the 1 year post-discharge, excluding drug costs.
Sujet(s)
Coûts des soins de santé , Défaillance cardiaque , Hospitalisation , Medicare (USA) , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2 , Humains , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/thérapie , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Hospitalisation/économie , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Mâle , États-Unis , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Medicare (USA)/économie , Débit systolique/physiologie , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , EnregistrementsRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of the addition of vericiguat for treating chronic heart failure (CHF) in China from the healthcare payer's perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was built to estimate the cost and utility of treating CHF using vericiguat plus standard treatment (vericiguat group) vs. standard treatment alone (standard treatment group). The clinical parameters (mortality of cardiovascular and hospitalization rate of HF) were calculated according to the VICTORIA clinical trial. The HF cost and utility data were obtained from the literature published in China. One-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: According to the 13-year model, vericiguat was more expensive (155599.07 CNY vs. 259396.83 CNY) and more effective (4.41 QALYs vs. 4.54 QALYs). The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was 802389.27 CNY per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that cardiovascular mortality in the two groups was the parameter that had the greatest impact on the results. The GDP per capita in 2022 in China was 85,700 CNY. The probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) showed that the probability of vericiguat being cost-effective was only 41.7% at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times GDP per capita (257,100 CNY). CONCLUSIONS: In China, the treatment of CHF with vericiguat is not cost-effective. The drug price could decrease to 145.8 CNY, which could be considered cost-effective.
Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Défaillance cardiaque , Chaines de Markov , Pyrimidines , Débit systolique , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/mortalité , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Chine , Pyrimidines/usage thérapeutique , Pyrimidines/économie , Maladie chronique/traitement médicamenteux , Association de médicaments , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Mâle , Femelle , Composés hétérobicycliquesRÉSUMÉ
Aim: To assesses the cost-effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes. Materials & methods: A de novo cost-effectiveness model with a Markov structure was created for patients hospitalized for heart failure with comorbid diabetes. Outcomes of interest included hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and all-cause mortality measured over a 30-year time horizon. Baseline event frequencies were derived from published real-world data studies; sotagliflozin's efficacy was estimated from SOLOIST-WHF. Health benefits were calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs included pharmaceutical costs, rehospitalization, emergency room visits and adverse events. Economic value was measured using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: Sotagliflozin use decreased annualized rehospitalization rates by 34.5% (0.228 vs 0.348, difference: -0.120), annualized emergency department visits by 40.0% (0.091 vs 0.153, difference: -0.061) and annualized mortality by 18.0% (0.298 vs 0.363, difference: -0.065) relative to standard of care, resulting in a net gain in QAYs of 0.425 for sotagliflozin versus standard of care. Incremental costs using sotagliflozin increased by $19,374 over a 30-year time horizon of the patient, driven largely by increased pharmaceutical cost. Estimated ICER for sotagliflozin relative to standard of care was $45,596 per QALY. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin is a cost-effective addition to standard of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes.
Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Hétérosides , Défaillance cardiaque , Chaines de Markov , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2 , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/mortalité , Hétérosides/usage thérapeutique , Hétérosides/économie , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2/économie , Réadmission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Réadmission du patient/économie , Femelle , Mâle , Hospitalisation/économie , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Diabète de type 2/traitement médicamenteux , Diabète de type 2/économie , Diabète de type 2/complications , Sujet âgé , Service hospitalier d'urgences/économie , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promising results in enhancing the management of heart failure (HF). Although health care interventions are increasingly being delivered digitally, with growing evidence on the potential cost-effectiveness of adopting them, there has been little effort to collate and synthesize the findings. OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to systematically review the economic evaluations that assess the adoption of DHIs in the management and treatment of HF. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using 3 electronic databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. Articles reporting full economic evaluations of DHIs for patients with HF published up to July 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Study characteristics, design (both trial based and model based), input parameters, and main results were extracted from full-text articles. Data synthesis was conducted based on the technologies used for delivering DHIs in the management of patients with HF, and the findings were analyzed narratively. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for this systematic review. The reporting quality of the included studies was evaluated using the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 27 economic evaluations were included in the review. The economic evaluations were based on models (13/27, 48%), trials (13/27, 48%), or a combination approach (1/27, 4%). The devices evaluated included noninvasive remote monitoring devices (eg, home telemonitoring using digital tablets or specific medical devices that enable transmission of physiological data), telephone support, mobile apps and wearables, remote monitoring follow-up in patients with implantable medical devices, and videoconferencing systems. Most of the studies (24/27, 89%) used cost-utility analysis. The majority of the studies (25/27, 93%) were conducted in high-income countries, particularly European countries (16/27, 59%) such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Mobile apps and wearables, remote monitoring follow-up in patients with implantable medical devices, and videoconferencing systems yielded cost-effective results or even emerged as dominant strategies. However, conflicting results were observed, particularly in noninvasive remote monitoring devices and telephone support. In 15% (4/27) of the studies, these DHIs were found to be less costly and more effective than the comparators (ie, dominant), while 33% (9/27) reported them to be more costly but more effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below the respective willingness-to-pay thresholds (ie, cost-effective). Furthermore, in 11% (3/27) of the studies, noninvasive remote monitoring devices and telephone support were either above the willingness-to-pay thresholds or more costly than, yet as effective as, the comparators (ie, not cost-effective). In terms of reporting quality, the studies were classified as good (20/27, 74%), moderate (6/27, 22%), or excellent (1/27, 4%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the conflicting results, the main findings indicated that, overall, DHIs were more cost-effective than non-DHI alternatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023388241; https://tinyurl.com/2p9axpmc.
Sujet(s)
, Défaillance cardiaque , Télémédecine , Humains , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Défaillance cardiaque/thérapie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Télémédecine/économieRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem worldwide, affecting more than 64 million people [1]. The complex and severe nature of HF presents challenges in providing cost-effective care as patients often require multiple hospitalizations and treatments. This review of relevant studies with focus on the last 10 years summarizes the health and economic implications of various HF treatment options in Europe and beyond. Although the main cost drivers in HF treatment are clinical (re)admission and decompensation of HF, an assessment of the economic impacts of various other device therapy options for HF care are included in this review. This includes: cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as cardiac-resynchronisation-therapy devices that include pacemaking (CRT-P), cardiac-resynchronisation-therapy devices that include defibrillation (CRT-D), implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) and various types of pacemakers. The impact of (semi)automated (tele)monitoring as a relevant factor for increasing both the quality and economic impact of care is also taken into consideration. Quality of life adjusted life years (QALYs) are used in the overall context as a composite metric reflecting quantity and quality of life as a standardized measurement of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of different device-based HF interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: In terms of the total cost of different devices, CRT-Ds were found in several studies to be more expensive than all other devices in regards to runtime and maintenance costs including (re)implantation. In the case of CRT combined with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) versus ICD alone, CRT-D was found to be the most cost-effective treatment in research work over the past 10 years. Further comparison between CRT-D vs. CRT-P does not show an economic advantage of CRT-D as a minority of patients require shock therapy. Furthermore, a positive health economic effect and higher survival rate is seen in CRT-P full ventricular stimulation vs. right heart only stimulation. Telemedical care has been found to provide a positive health economic impact for selected patient groups-even reducing patient mortality. For heart failure both in ICD and CRT-D subgroups the given telemonitoring benefit seems to be greater in higher-risk populations with a worse HF prognosis. In patients with HF, all CIED therapies are in the range of commonly accepted cost-effectiveness. QALY and ICER calculations provide a more nuanced understanding of the economic impact these therapies create in the healthcare landscape. For severe cases of HF, CRT-D with telemedical care seems to be the better option from a health economic standpoint, as therapy is more expensive, but costs per QALY range below the commonly accepted threshold.
Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Défibrillateurs implantables , Défaillance cardiaque , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/thérapie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défibrillateurs implantables/économie , Thérapie de resynchronisation cardiaque/économie , Thérapie de resynchronisation cardiaque/méthodes , Dispositifs de resynchronisation cardiaque/économie , Qualité de vie , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Pacemaker/économieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Vericiguat is a new medication to demonstrate clinical efficacy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after worsening heart failure (WHF) events, but its cost-utility was unknown. We aimed to assess the cost-utility of combining the application of vericiguat with standard treatment in HFrEF patients who had WHF events. METHODS: A multistate Markov model was implemented to mimic the economic results of HFrEF patients who had WHF events in China after receiving vericiguat or placebo. An analysis of cost-utility was conducted; most parameters were set according to the published studies and related databases. All the utilities and costs were decreased at a rate of 5% annually. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were the primary outcome measure. We also conducted sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Over a 20 year lifetime horizon, additional use of vericiguat led to an elevated cost from US$9725.03 to US$20,660.76 at the current vericiguat costs. This was related to increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from 2.50 to 2.66, along with an ICER of US$65,057.24 per QALY, which was over the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$36,096.30 per QALY. If the vericiguat costs were discounted at 80%, it contributed to an ICER of US$12,226.77 per QALY. Additional use of vericiguat for patients with plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) of ≤ 5314 pg per ml produced an ICER of US$23,688.46 per QALY. The outcomes of the one-way sensitivity analysis showed the risk of death from cardiovascular disease in both groups was variable with the highest sensitivity. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 41.6% of the mimicked population receiving vericiguat combined with standard therapy was cost-effective at the WTP threshold of US$36,096.30 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of Chinese public healthcare system, the combined use of vericiguat and standard treatment in patients with HFrEF following WHF events did not generate advantages in cost-utility in China but was a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for those who with plasma NT-proBNP of ≤ 5314 pg per ml.
Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Défaillance cardiaque , Chaines de Markov , Pyrimidines , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Débit systolique , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/traitement médicamenteux , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Chine , Pyrimidines/économie , Pyrimidines/usage thérapeutique , Débit systolique/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Peptide natriurétique cérébral/sang , Mâle , Femelle , Fragments peptidiques/sang , Fragments peptidiques/économie , Sujet âgé , Adulte d'âge moyenRÉSUMÉ
This study examines whether payments from a left ventricular assist device manufacturer to cardiologists performing percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with any use of the devices.
Sujet(s)
Cardiologues , Défaillance cardiaque , Dispositifs d'assistance circulatoire , Medicare part B (USA) , Humains , Cardiologues/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Défaillance cardiaque/thérapie , Dispositifs d'assistance circulatoire/économie , Dispositifs d'assistance circulatoire/statistiques et données numériques , Dispositifs d'assistance circulatoire/tendances , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Études transversales , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mâle , Femelle , Medicare part B (USA)/économie , Medicare part B (USA)/statistiques et données numériques , Medicare part B (USA)/tendancesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is associated with a poor prognosis. There is a lack of data examining the outcomes and readmission rates of sarcoidosis patients with heart failure (SwHF) and without heart failure (SwoHF). We aimed to compare the impact of non-ischemic heart failure on outcomes and readmissions in these two groups. METHODS: The US Nationwide Readmission Database was queried from 2010 to 2019 for SwHF and SwoHF patients identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Editions. Those with ischemic heart disease were excluded, and both cohorts were propensity matched for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Clinical characteristics, length of stay, adjusted healthcare-associated costs, 90-day readmission and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 97,961 hospitalized patients (median age 63 years, 37.9% male) with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis (35.9% SwHF vs 64.1% SwoHF). On index admission, heart failure patients had higher prevalences of atrioventricular block (3.3% vs 1.4%, P < .0001), ventricular tachycardia (6.5% vs 1.3%, P < .0001), ventricular fibrillation (0.4% vs 0.1%, P < .0001) and atrial fibrillation (22.1% vs 7.5%, P < .0001). SwHF patients were more likely to be readmitted (hazard ratio 1.28, P < .0001), had higher length of hospital stay (5 vs 4 days, P < .0001), adjusted healthcare-associated costs ($9,667.0 vs $9,087.1, P < .0001) and mortality rates on readmission (5.1% vs 3.8%, P < .0001). Predictors of mortality included heart failure, increasing age, male sex, higher CCI, and liver disease. CONCLUSION: SwHF is associated with higher rates of arrhythmia at index admission, as well as greater hospital cost, readmission and mortality rates compared to those without heart failure.
Sujet(s)
Bases de données factuelles , Défaillance cardiaque , Réadmission du patient , Score de propension , Sarcoïdose , Humains , Défaillance cardiaque/mortalité , Défaillance cardiaque/épidémiologie , Défaillance cardiaque/économie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Réadmission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Sarcoïdose/complications , Sarcoïdose/mortalité , Sarcoïdose/épidémiologie , Sarcoïdose/économie , Sujet âgé , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , ComorbiditéRÉSUMÉ
Heart failure (HF) is increasing globally and turning out to be a serious worldwide public health problem with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to systemically review the budget impact analysis of heart failure treatments on health care expenditure worldwide. Scientific databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for budget impact analysis and heart failure treatments, over January 2001 to August 2023. The quality assessment of the selected studies was evaluated through ISPOR practice guideline. Nineteen studies were included in this systematic review. Based on ISPOR recommendations, most studies were performed on a 1-year time horizon and used a government (public health) or health system perspective. Data for selected studies was mainly collected from randomized clinical trials, published literature, pharmaceutical companies, and registry data. Only direct costs were reported in the studies. Sensitivity analyses were stated in almost all studies. However, studies conducted in high-income countries reported sensitivity analyses more elaborately than those performed in low- and middle-income countries. In many published articles related to the budget impact analyses of heart failure treatment, addition of new treatments to the health system's formularies can lead to a reduction in cardiovascular hospitalization rates, re-hospitalization rates, cardiac-associated mortality rates, and an improvement in heart failure class, which can decrease the costs of hospitalizations, specified care visits, primary care visits, and other related treatments.