Consumer wearable devices for evaluation of heart rate control using digoxin versus beta-blockers: the RATE-AF randomized trial.

Consumer-grade wearable technology has the potential to support clinical research and patient management. Here, we report results from the RATE-AF trial wearables study, which was designed to compare heart rate in older, multimorbid patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and heart failure who were randomized to treatment with either digoxin or beta-blockers. Heart rate (n = 143,379,796) and physical activity (n = 23,704,307) intervals were obtained from 53 participants (mean age 75.6 years (s.d. 8.4), 40% women) using a wrist-worn wearable linked to a smartphone for 20 weeks. Heart rates in participants treated with digoxin versus beta-blockers were not significantly different (regression coefficient 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.82 to 5.27; P = 0.55); adjusted 0.66 (95% CI -3.45 to 4.77; P = 0.75)). No difference in heart rate was observed between the two groups of patients after accounting for physical activity (P = 0.74) or patients with high activity levels (≥30,000 steps per week; P = 0.97). Using a convolutional neural network designed to account for missing data, we found that wearable device data could predict New York Heart Association functional class 5 months after baseline assessment similarly to standard clinical measures of electrocardiographic heart rate and 6-minute walk test (F1 score 0.56 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.70) versus 0.55 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.68); P = 0.88 for comparison). The results of this study indicate that digoxin and beta-blockers have equivalent effects on heart rate in atrial fibrillation at rest and on exertion, and suggest that dynamic monitoring of individuals with arrhythmia using wearable technology could be an alternative to in-person assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02391337 .

Association of intravenous digoxin use in acute heart failure with rapid atrial fibrillation and short-term mortality according to patient age, renal function, and serum potassium.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous digoxin is still used in emergency departments (EDs) to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF), especially in those with rapid atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, many emergency physicians are reluctant to use intravenous digoxin in patients with advanced age, impaired renal function, and potassium disturbances due to its potential capacity to increase adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether intravenous digoxin used to treat rapid atrial fibrillation in patients with AHF may influence mortality in patients with specific age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum potassium classes. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of patients included in in the Spanish EAHFE cohort, which includes patients diagnosed with AHF in the ED. SETTING: 45 Spanish EDs. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand one hundred ninety-four patients with AHF and rapid atrial fibrillation (heart rate ≥100 bpm) not receiving digoxin at home, divided according to whether they were or were not treated with intravenous digoxin in the ED. OUTCOME: The relationships between age, eGFR, and potassium with 30-day mortality were investigated using restricted cubic spline (RCS) models adjusted for relevant patient and episode variables. The impact of digoxin use on such relationships was assessed by checking interaction. MAIN RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 82 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 76-87], 61.4% were women, 65.2% had previous episodes of atrial fibrillation, and the median heart rate at ED arrival was 120 bpm (IQR = 109-135). Digoxin and no digoxin groups were formed by 864 (39.4%) and 1330 (60.6%) patients, respectively. There were 191 deaths within the 30-day follow-up period (8.9%), with no differences between patients receiving or not receiving digoxin (8.5 vs. 9.1%, P  = 0.636). Although analysis of RCS curves showed that death was associated with advanced age, worse renal function, and hypo- and hyperkalemia, use of intravenous digoxin did not interact with any of these relationships ( P  = 0.156 for age, P  = 0.156 for eGFR; P  = 0.429 for potassium). CONCLUSION: The use of intravenous digoxin in the ED was not associated with significant changes in 30-day mortality, which was confirmed irrespective of patient age or the existence of renal dysfunction or serum potassium disturbances.

Digoxin treatment does not reinduce radioiodine uptake in radioiodine refractory non-medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Objective: Patients with non-medullary thyroid carcinoma (NMTC) that are refractory to radioactive iodine (RAI) have a poor prognosis. Strategies for restoring the ability to take up iodine, so-called redifferentiation, are promising but not suitable for all patients. Preclinical studies, in human cell lines just as in a murine model, have shown that the cardiac glycoside digoxin restored RAI uptake. This prospective single-center open-label study aimed to investigate whether treatment with digoxin could reinduce clinically relevant RAI uptake in patients with metastasized RAI-refractory NMTC. Methods: Eight patients with metastasized RAI-refractory NMTC were included between November 2022 and June 2023. Before treatment, a baseline [123I]NaI scintigraphy was performed. Thereafter, patients were treated with digoxin for 3 weeks. Starting doses depended on age and weight. For safety reasons, the usual therapeutic range was aimed for. After 1 week, the digoxin plasma concentration was measured, and the digoxin dose was adjusted if necessary. After 3 weeks of digoxin treatment, a second [123I]NaI scintigraphy was performed. RAI uptake was compared between the two scintigraphies. Results: Seven patients completed the digoxin treatment and were evaluable. None of the seven patients showed clinically relevant RAI uptake after digoxin treatment. No digoxin-related serious adverse events occurred during this trial. Conclusion: Contrary to results from preclinical trials, in this trial, 3 weeks of digoxin treatment did not reinduce RAI uptake in patients with NMTC. This highlights essential challenges regarding the approach toward optimization of studies aimed to restore the RAI uptake and its therapeutic efficacy through drug repurposing.

Preclinical 3D model screening reveals digoxin as an effective therapy for a rare and aggressive type of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DDEC) characterized by SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex inactivation is a highly aggressive type of endometrial cancer without effective systemic therapy options. Its uncommon nature and aggressive disease trajectory pose significant challenges for therapeutic progress. To address this obstacle, we focused on developing preclinical models tailored to this tumor type and established patient tumor-derived three-dimensional (3D) spheroid models of DDEC. METHODS: High-throughput drug repurposing screens were performed on in vitro 3D spheroid models of DDEC cell lines (SMARCA4-inactivated DDEC-1 and ARID1A/ARID1B co-inactivated DDEC-2). The dose-response relationships of the identified candidate drugs were evaluated in vitro, followed by in vivo evaluation using xenograft models of DDEC-1 and DDEC-2. RESULTS: Drug screen in 3D models identified multiple cardiac glycosides including digoxin and digitoxin as candidate drugs in both DDEC-1 and DDEC-2. Subsequent in vitro dose-response analyses confirmed the inhibitory activity of digoxin and digitoxin with both drugs showing lower IC50 in DDEC cells compared to non-DDEC endometrial cancer cells. In in vivo xenograft models, digoxin significantly suppressed the growth of DDEC tumors at clinically relevant serum concentrations. CONCLUSION: Using biologically precise preclinical models of DDEC derived from patient tumor samples, our study identified digoxin as an effective drug in suppressing DDEC tumor growth. These findings provide compelling preclinical evidence for the use of digoxin as systemic therapy for SWI/SNF-inactivated DDEC, which may also be applicable to other SWI/SNF-inactivated tumor types.

Digoxin and Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia and Death in ICD Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown digoxin use to be associated with adverse outcomes, including increased mortality. There are limited data on whether digoxin use is associated with increased risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess whether digoxin use is associated with increased risk of VT/VF in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with a primary prevention ICD in landmark clinical trials. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator who were enrolled in 4 landmark MADIT trials (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials). We employed propensity score quintile stratification for treatment with digoxin as well as additional multivariable adjustment to assess the risk of digoxin vs no-digoxin therapy for the endpoints of first and recurrent VT/VF and all-cause mortality. The proportional hazards regression models for arrhythmia-specific endpoints incorporated adjustments for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: At baseline, 1,155 of 4,499 patients were on digoxin (26%). After propensity score quintile stratification, patients prescribed digoxin were shown to exhibit a statistically significant 48% increased risk of VT/VF (P < 0.001), 42% increased risk of the composite of VT/VF or death (P < 0.001), and a 37% increased risk of all-cause mortality (P = 0.006). Digoxin use was also associated with increased risk of appropriate ICD shocks (HR: 1.91; P < 0.001) and with increased burden of VT/VF events (HR: 1.46; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggests that digoxin use is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmia and death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with an ICD.

Practice patterns of rate control in atrial fibrillation and clinical outcomes from a nationwide cohort.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common, but there are limited data to guide selection of rate control medications (RCM). Reasons for selection are multivariable, and the impact on outcomes is unknown. We investigated prescribing patterns of RCM among patients with AF. Using a nationwide database, we identified 135,927 patients with AF. We stratified by baseline presence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and examined prescription rates of RCM as a function of clinical variables. We also evaluated associations with clinical outcomes. Beta blockers (BB) were most commonly prescribed (44.6%), then calcium channel blockers (CCB) (14.0%) and digoxin (8.6%). Patients prescribed BB were more likely male (45.6% vs 43.4%, p < 0.0001), patients prescribed CCB were less likely male (12.0% vs 16.3%, p < 0.0001). There were higher rates of HF hospitalization (HFH) among females and those with Medicaid. Randomized trials are needed to define optimal choice of RCM.

Identification and characterization of critical values in therapeutic drug monitoring: a retrospective analysis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a crucial clinical practice that improves pharmacological effectiveness and prevent severe drug-related adverse events. Timely reporting and intervention of critical values during TDM are essential for patient safety. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the laboratory data to provide an overview of the incidence, distribution pattern and biochemical correlates of critical values during TDM. A total of 19,110 samples were tested for nine drug concentrations between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Of these, 241 critical values were identified in 165 patients. The most common critical values were vancomycin trough (63.4%), followed by tacrolimus trough (16.9%) and digoxin (15.2%). The primary sources of drug critical values were the department of general intensive care unit (ICU), cardiology, and surgery ICU. At baseline or the time of critical value, significant differences were found between the vancomycin, digoxin, and tacrolimus groups in terms of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, N-terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP), and lymphocyte percentage, P < 0.05. Therefore, it is important to prioritize and closely monitor drug concentrations to reduce laboratory critical values during TDM.

Combination therapy of beta-blockers and digoxin is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the GLORIA-AF registry.

The effect of digoxin and beta-blockers on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality remains unclear. The study aimed to determine differences in cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and death rates among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were prescribed with beta-blockers, digoxin or combination therapy. Data from phase II/III of the prospective Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Anti-thrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) were analysed. The risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and death among patients with different prescriptions using COX proportional hazard regression was considered. Propensity score (PS) matching and weighting were further used to adjust for potential confounders of prescription use. A total of 14,201 patients [median age: 71.0 (IQR 64.0-77.0) years; 46.2% female] were recruited. After a median follow-up of 3.0 (IQR 2.4-3.1) years, 864 MACE, and 988 all-cause deaths were recorded. The incidence rate (IR) of MACE was 22.4 (95%CI 21.0-24.0) per 1000 person-years, while the IR of all-cause death was 25.4 (95%CI 23.8-27.0) per 1000 person-years. After multivariate adjustment with Cox regression, the risk of MACE (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68) and the risk of all-cause death (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.04-1.57) were significantly higher in the combination therapy group, compared to the beta-blockers alone group. The risks of MACE and all-cause death remained significant in both PS matched and PS weighted cohort Among AF patients, combination therapy of beta-blockers and digoxin was associated with higher risks of MACE and all-cause death compared to beta-blockers alone.

Digoxin is Not Related to Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure: Results from the SELFIE-TR Registry.

AIMS: Digoxin has been used in the treatment for heart failure for centuries, but the role of this drug in the modern era is controversial. A particular concern is the recent observational findings suggesting an increase in all-cause mortality with digoxin, although such observations suffer from biased results since these studies usually do not provide adequate compensation for the severity of disease. Using a nationwide registry database, we aimed to investigate whether digoxin is associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure irrespective of phenotype. METHODS: A total of 1014 out of 1054 patients in the registry, of whom 110 patients were on digoxin, were included in the study. Multivariable adjustments were done and propensity scores were calculated for various prognostic indicators, including signs and symptoms of heart failure and functional capacity. Crude mortality, mortality adjusted for covariates, mortality in the propensity score-matched cohort, and Bayesian factors (BFs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Crude 1-year mortality rate did not differ between patients on and off digoxin (17.3% vs 20.1%, log-rank p = 0.46), and digoxin was not related to mortality following multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.539-1.402, p = 0.57). Similarly, all-cause mortality was similar in 220 propensity-score adjusted patients (17.3% vs 20.0%, log-rank p = 0.55). On Bayesian analyses, there was moderate to strong evidence suggesting a lack of difference between in unmatched cohort (BF10 0.091) and weak-to-moderate evidence in the matched cohort (BF10 0.296). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort, we did not find any evidence for an increased 1-year mortality in heart failure patients on digoxin.

Navigating Heart Failure: Unveiling Sex Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Combinations.

Major heart failure (HF) trials remain insufficient in terms of assessing the differences in clinical characteristics, biomarkers, treatment efficacy, and safety because of the under-representation of women. The study aimed to present sex-related disparities in HF management, including differences in demographics, co-morbidities, cardiac biomarkers, prescribed medications, and treatment outcomes. The study utilized anonymized data from the Turkish Ministry of Health's National Electronic Database between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. The cohort analysis included 2,501,231 adult patients with HF. Specific therapeutic combinations were analyzed using a Cox regression model to obtain relative risk reduction for all-cause death. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. In the cohort, 48.7% (n = 1,218,911) were male, whereas 51.3% (n = 1,282,320) were female. Female patients exhibited a higher median age (71 vs 68 years) and manifested higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, anemia, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and ischemic stroke. Male patients demonstrated higher rates of previous myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Higher concentrations of natriuretic peptides were observed in female patients. Renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitor, ß blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), and ivabradine were more commonly prescribed in male patients, whereas loop diuretics, digoxin, and ferric carboxymaltose were more frequent in female patients. Male patients had higher rates of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation rates. All-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were higher in male patients. Compared with monotherapy, all combinations, including SGLT2i, showed a beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in both female and male patients with HF. In hospitalized patients with HF, the addition of digoxin to renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and ß blockers was superior to monotherapy regarding all-cause mortality in female patients with HF compared with male patients with HF. In conclusion, this study highlights that sex-specific responses to HF medication combinations compared with monotherapy and differences in co-morbidities underscore the importance of tailored management strategies. Digoxin showed a contrasting effect on all-cause mortality between both sexes after hospitalization, whereas SGLT2i exhibited a consistent beneficial effect in both sexes when added to all combinations.

Pharmacological Treatments in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has weaker evidence compared with reduced ejection fraction, despite recent trials with an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to estimate the aggregate therapeutic benefit of drugs for HFmrEF and HFpEF. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized trials including patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%, treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (analyzed together as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors [RASi]), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), digoxin, ARNI, and SGLT2i. An additive component network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); secondary outcomes were CV death, total HHF, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The authors identified 13 studies with a total of 29,875 patients and a mean LVEF of 56.3% ± 8.7%. ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i separately, but not RASi, BB, or digoxin, reduced the primary composite outcome compared with placebo. The combination of ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i was the most effective (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.31-0.70]); this was largely explained by the triple combination of ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i (HR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.43-0.71]). Results were similar for CV death (HR: 0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.91] for ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i) or total HHF (HR: 0.49 [95% CI 0.33-0.71] for ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i) alone. In a subgroup analysis, only SGLT2i had a consistent benefit among all LVEF subgroups, whereas the triple combination had the greatest benefit in HFmrEF, robust benefit in patients with LVEF 50% to 59%, and a statistically marginal benefit in patients with LVEF ≥60%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and LVEF>40%, the quadruple combination of ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i provides the largest reduction in the risk of CV death and HHF; driven by the robust effect of the triple combination of ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i. The benefit was more pronounced in HFmrEF patients.

Uso de digoxina endovenosa en urgencias para tratar pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y su impacto en la evolución a corto plazo / Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes

Objetivos: Analizar los factores relacionados con el uso de digoxina en urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) y el impacto pronóstico a corto plazo. Método: Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 45 servicios de urgencias españoles sin tratamiento crónico con digoxina, los cuales se dividieron según recibiesen digoxina endovenosa en urgencias o no. Se recogieron 51 variables relativas al paciente o al episodio de descompensación y se investigó el perfil del paciente tratado con digoxina en urgencias. Como variables evolutivas se investigaron la necesidad de ingreso, la estancia en urgencias prolongada (> 24 horas) en dados de alta y la hospitalización prolongada (> 7 días) en ingresados, y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días por cualquier causa. Se analizó si el tratamiento con digoxina se asoció a diferencias evolutivas, de forma cruda y ajustada a las características del paciente y el episodio de ICA. Resultados: Se analizaron 15.549 pacientes (mediana = 83 años, mujeres = 55%), de los que 1.430 (9,2%) fueron tratados con digoxina. La digoxina se utilizó más en mujeres, pacientes jóvenes, en mejor clase funcional de la New York Heart Association (NYHA), pero con descompensaciones más graves y, sobre todo, cuando existía una fibrilación auricular (FA) con respuesta ventricular rápida como desencadenante. Se hospitalizó el 75,4% de pacientes (más frecuente en tratados con digoxina; 81,6% vs 74,8%, p < 0,001), tuvo estancia prolongada en urgencias el 38,3% (52,9% vs 37,2%, p < 0,001), hospitalización prolongada el 48,1% (49,3% vs 47,9%, p = 0,385), mortalidad intrahospitalaria el 7,2% (6,9% vs 7,2%, p = 0,712) y a 30 días el 9,7% (9,3% vs 9,7%, p = 0,625). El modelo ajustado mostró que el uso de digoxina en urgencias sólo se asoció con estancia prolongada en urgencias (OR = 1,883, IC 95% = 1,359-2,608), pero no con la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics. Results: Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P < .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P < .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality. (AU)

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of atrial flutter in neonates.

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is an uncommon arrhythmia that can cause severe morbidity, including heart failure and even death in refractory cases. This study investigated the clinical characteristics, treatment, and long-term outcomes of patients with neonatal atrial flutter and its association with heart failure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed atrial flutter cases observed in our center between 1999 and 2021 and analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment, and recurrence according to the presence of heart failure. RESULTS: The study comprised 15 patients with atrial flutter, with median bodyweight and gestational age of 2.7 kg, 37+4 weeks, respectively. Twelve patients were diagnosed with atrial flutter on the first day of life. The median atrial and ventricular rates were 440/min, 220/min, respectively. Four patients exhibited congestive heart failure. Episodic recurrence was noted in five patients and occurred at a higher rate in patients with congestive heart failure (p = 0.004). Antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance treatment were administered more often in patients with heart failure (p = 0.011). Initial treatment included direct current cardioversion (n = 9), digoxin (n = 4), and observation (n = 2). Four patients treated with cardioversion experienced recurrence during the neonatal period, and none of those treated with digoxin experienced recurrence. The median follow-up duration was 7 years, during which no atrial flutter recurrence was evident. CONCLUSION: Neonates with congestive heart failure had a higher recurrence of atrial flutter. Direct current cardioversion is the most reliable treatment for neonatal atrial flutter, whereas digoxin may be a viable treatment option in refractory and recurrent cases.

Refractory supraventricular fetal tachycardia as a cause of non-immune hydrops: management conundrum.

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) is the most common form of fetal tachyarrhythmias. The presentation can vary from ill-defined, non-sustained episodes of tachyarrhythmia to frank non-immune hydrops. The standard of care is transplacental therapy by treating the mother with oral antiarrhythmic drugs, followed by direct fetal therapy in refractory cases. We report a case of primigravida in her late 20s, who presented at 28.1 weeks of gestation with fetal hydrops and SVT. She was initially managed with oral digoxin and flecainide, but due to worsening hydrops, risk of fetal demise and extreme prematurity, further management by direct fetal therapy was given in terms of intramuscular digoxin and intraperitoneal flecainide. Following which, the fetus had a favourable outcome. This case highlights the possible role of direct fetal therapy in refractory cases of SVT.

Factores asociados al tratamiento crónico no justificado con digoxina en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y relación con el pronóstico a corto plazo / Factors associated with unjustified chronic treatment with digoxin in patients with acute heart failure and relationship with short-term prognosis

Objetivos Analizar los factores relacionados con el tratamiento crónico inadecuado con digoxina, y si esta inadecuación impacta en la evolución a corto plazo. Método Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en tratamiento crónico con digoxina, y se clasificaron como con tratamiento indicado o no indicado, investigándose los factores asociados a este hecho, y si se asociaba a mortalidad intrahospitalaria a 30 días, estancia hospitalaria prolongada (>7 días) y evento adverso combinado (reconsulta a urgencias, hospitalización por ICA o muerte por cualquier causa) durante los 30 días postalta. Resultados Se analizaron 2.366 pacientes en tratamiento crónico con digoxina (mediana=83 años, mujeres=61%): adecuado en 1.373 casos (58,0%), inadecuado en 993 (42,0%). La inadecuación se asoció con mayor edad, menor comorbilidad, menor tratamiento con betabloqueantes e IECA, mejor función ventricular y peor índice de Barthel. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días fue mayor en pacientes con tratamiento inadecuado (9,9 versus 7,6%, p=0,05; y 12,6 versus 9,1%, p<0,001; respectivamente); no hubo diferencias en estancia prolongada (35,7 versus 33,8%) ni en eventos adversos posalta (32,9 versus 31,8%). Ajustando las diferencias basales y del episodio de descompensación, el tratamiento crónico inadecuado con digoxina no se asoció con ningún resultado, con odds ratio de 1,31 (IC 95%: 0,85-2,03) para mortalidad intrahospitalaria, 1,29 (0,74-2,25) para mortalidad a 30 días; 1,07 (0,82-1,40) para estancia prolongada y 0,88 (0,65-1,19) para evento adverso posalta. Conclusión Existe un perfil de paciente que recibe de forma inadecuada tratamiento crónico con digoxina, si bien ello no se asocia con resultados adversos a corto plazo durante los episodios de ICA (AU)

Objectives To analyze the factors related to inadequate chronic treatment with digoxin and whether the inadequacy of treatment has an impact on short-term outcome. Method Patients diagnosed with AHF who were in chronic treatment with digoxin were selected. Digoxin treatment was classified as adequate or inadequate. We investigated factors associated to inadequacy and whether such inadequacy was associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days) and combined adverse event (re-consultation to the ED or hospitalization for AHF or death from any cause) during the 30 days after discharge. Results We analyzed 2366 patients on chronic digoxin treatment (median age=83 years, women=61%), which was considered adequate in 1373 cases (58.0%) and inadequate in 993 (42.0%). The inadequacy was associated with older age, less comorbidity, less treatment with beta-blockers and renin–angiotensin inhibitors, better ventricular function, and worse Barthel index. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was higher in patients with inadequate digoxin treatment (9.9% vs. 7.6%, p=0.05; and 12.6% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001, respectively). No differences were recorded in prolonged stay (35.7% vs. 33.8%) or post-discharge adverse events (32.9% vs. 31.8%). In the model adjusted for baseline and decompensation episode differences, inadequate treatment with digoxin was not significantly associated with any outcome, with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI=0.85-2.03) for in-hospital mortality; 1.29 (0.74-2.25) for 30-day mortality; 1.07 (0.82-1.40) for prolonged stay; and 0.88 (0.65-1.19) for post-discharge adverse event. Conclusion There is a profile of patients with AHF who inadequately receive digoxin, although this inadequateness for chronic digitalis treatment was not associated with short-term adverse outcomes (AU)

Digoxin protects against intervertebral disc degeneration via TNF/NF-κB and LRP4 signaling.

Background: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a leading cause of low back pain (LBP). The pathological process of IVDD is associated with inflammatory reactions and extracellular matrix (ECM) disorders. Digoxin is widely used for treating heart failure, and it has been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects. Objective: This study is to investigate the role of digoxin in the pathogenesis of intervertebral disc degeneration as well as the involved molecular mechanism, particularly the potential target protein. Methods: We exploited a rat needle model to investigate digoxin's role in intervertebral disc degeneration in vivo. Safranin O staining was used to measure cartilaginous tissue in the intervertebral disc. The morphological changes of intervertebral discs in animal models were determined by Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) staining and the pathological score. Primary nucleus pulposus cells (NP cells) from intervertebral discs of patients and murine were used in the present study. Western-Blotting assay, Real-time PCR assay, immunofluorescence staining, and immunochemistry were used to detect the role of digoxin in anti-TNF-α-induced inflammatory effects in vitro. Transfection of siRNA was used to regulate low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) expression in NP cells to investigate the potential protein target of digoxin. Results: Digoxin protected against intervertebral disc degeneration in rat needle models. Digoxin was found to exert its disc-protective effects through at least three different pathways by a) suppressing TNF-α-induced inflammation, b) attenuating ECM destruction, c) significantly promoting ECM anabolism. Additionally, LRP4 was found to be the downstream molecule of digoxin in NP cells for anti-inflammation and regulation of ECM metabolism. The knockdown of LRP4 downregulated the protective effect of digoxin in NP cells. Conclusion: These findings suggest that digoxin may be a potential therapeutic agent for intervertebral disc degeneration through anti-catabolism and pro-anabolism. Digoxin might also work as an alternative for other inflammation-related diseases.

Association of Digoxin Use With Transplant-Free Interstage Survival in Infants Palliated With a Stage 1 Hybrid Procedure.

Background Digoxin prescription in patients with single-ventricle physiology after stage 1 palliation is associated with reduced interstage death. Prior literature has primarily included patients having undergone the Norwood procedure. We sought to determine if digoxin prescription at discharge in infants following hybrid stage 1 palliation was associated with improved transplant-free interstage survival. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter cohort analysis was conducted using data from the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative registry data from 2008 to 2021. Infants with functional single ventricles and aortic arch obstruction discharged home after the hybrid stage 1 palliation hospitalization were included. Patients were excluded if they had supraventricular tachycardia or conversion to Norwood operation. The primary outcome was transplant-free survival. Multivariable logistic regression analysis including a propensity score for digoxin use identified associations between digoxin use and interstage death or transplant. Of 259 included infants from 45 sites, 158 (61%) had hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Forty-nine percent had a gestational age ≤38 weeks, 18% had a birth weight <2.5 kg, and 58% had a preoperative risk factor. Of the 259 subjects, 129 (50%) were discharged on digoxin. Interstage death or transplant occurred in 30 (23%) patients in the no-digoxin group compared with 18 (14%) in the digoxin group (P=0.06). With multivariate analysis, discharge digoxin prescription was associated with a lower risk of interstage death or transplant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.24-0.93]; P=0.03). Conclusions In infants with single-ventricle physiology who underwent hybrid stage 1 palliation, digoxin prescription at hospital discharge was associated with improved interstage transplant-free survival.