Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: An Update on Incidence, Risk Factors, Management, and Clinical Sequelae in 1,141 Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: An update on the incidence, risk factors, clinical sequalae, and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the St George CRS/HIPEC database. RESULTS: Sixty-five (5.7%) out of 1,141 patients developed a POPF. Patients with POPFs were older, had a higher peritoneal cancer index, longer operation time, and required more units of blood intraoperatively. Splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy were significant risk factors for developing POPFs. While there was no effect on overall long-term survival in POPF patients, they did suffer higher rates of Clavien-Dindo grade 3/4 complications, in-hospital deaths, and longer hospital length of stay. Of the 65 POPF patients, 23 were taken back to theatre, 48 required radiological drains and 7 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. CONCLUSION: There are multiple risk factors for developing POPFs that are non-modifiable. While POPFs are associated with increased postoperative morbidity, long-term survival does not appear to be affected.

Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: Analysis of 600 cases of pancreatoduodenectomy patients over a 10-year period at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common and critical complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), effective strategies to prevent POPF have not yet been completely developed. Because appropriate management of POPF is important to reduce the mortality rate after PD, in this study we aimed to evaluate our approach for the management of POPF after PD, including the postoperative course. METHODS: This retrospective study included 605 consecutive patients who underwent PD at our hospital between 2010 and 2020. All patients who developed POPF were first managed conservatively, with drainage tubes placed during surgery retained to manage POPF. In cases wherein conservative treatment was unsuccessful, open drainage, followed by continuous negative pressure and continuous irrigation, was used. For open drainage, the surgical wound was opened bluntly (approximate length, 5 cm) under local anesthesia, and the fluid was directly and completely drained. RESULTS: The prevalence of POPF of grades B and C was 15.4% (n = 93) and 0.33% (n = 2), respectively. Of these patients, 1 required reoperation, 43 recovered with conservative management only, 47 required open drainage, and 4 required image-guided percutaneous drainage. Postoperative hemorrhage with a pseudoaneurysm was identified in 3 (0.66%) patients. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was low (n = 1, 0.16%). The rate of successful POPF management was 98.9%. CONCLUSION: Based on our high success rate in POPF management, we consider open drainage to be a safe primary management method for POPF.

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas decrease the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a critical complication after surgery for pancreatic cancer. Whether a POPF affects the long-term prognosis of pancreatic cancer cases remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the effect of a POPF on the long-term prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients, especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). METHODS: Patients who underwent curative pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between January 2012 and June 2019 at Kyoto University Hospital were retrospectively investigated. A fistula ≥ Grade B was considered a POPF. RESULTS: During the study period, 148 patients underwent upfront surgery (Upfront group), and 52 patients underwent surgery after NACRT (NACRT group). A POPF developed in 16% of patients in the Upfront group and 13% in the NACRT group (p = 0.824). In the Upfront group, development of a POPF did not have a significant effect on recurrence-free survival (p = 0.766) or overall survival (p = 0.863). However, in the NACRT group, development of a POPF significantly decreased recurrence-free survival (HR 5.856, p = 0.002) and overall survival (HR 7.097, p = 0.020) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a POPF decreases the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated by surgery after NACRT.

The individualized selection of Pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy has markedly decreased but remains an important challenge for the complexity of operation and technical skills involved. The present study aimed to clarify the impact of individualized pancreaticoenteric anastomosis and management to postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS: Data from 529 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were retrospectively analysed from the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking Cancer Hospital. The pancreaticoenteric anastomosis was determined based on the pancreatic texture and diameter of the main pancreatic duct. The amylase value of the drainage fluid was dynamically monitored postoperatively on days 3, 5 and 7. A low speed intermittent irrigation was performed in selected patients. Intraoperative and postoperative results were collected and compared between the pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) group and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) group. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2019, 529 consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in 364 patients; pancreaticojejunostomy was performed in 150 patients respectively. The clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) was 9.8% and mortality was zero. The soft pancreas, diameter of main pancreatic duct≤3 mm, BMI ≥ 25, operation time > 330 min and pancreaticogastrostomy was correlated with postoperative pancreatic fistula significantly. The CR-POPF of PJ was significantly higher than that of PG in soft pancreas patients; the operation time of PJ was shorter than that of PG significantly in hard pancreas patients. Intraoperative blood loss and operation time of PG was less than that of PJ significantly in normal pancreatic duct patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Individualized pancreaticoenteric anastomosis should be determined based on the pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameter. The appropriate anastomosis and postoperative management could prevent mortality.

Care after pancreatic resection according to an algorithm for early detection and minimally invasive management of pancreatic fistula versus current practice (PORSCH-trial): design and rationale of a nationwide stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resection is a major abdominal operation with 50% risk of postoperative complications. A common complication is pancreatic fistula, which may have severe clinical consequences such as postoperative bleeding, organ failure and death. The objective of this study is to investigate whether implementation of an algorithm for early detection and minimally invasive management of pancreatic fistula may improve outcomes after pancreatic resection. METHODS: This is a nationwide stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, superiority trial, designed in adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. During a period of 22 months, all Dutch centers performing pancreatic surgery will cross over in a randomized order from current practice to best practice according to the algorithm. This evidence-based and consensus-based algorithm will provide daily multilevel advice on the management of patients after pancreatic resection (i.e. indication for abdominal imaging, antibiotic treatment, percutaneous drainage and removal of abdominal drains). The algorithm is designed to aid early detection and minimally invasive step-up management of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Outcomes of current practice will be compared with outcomes after implementation of the algorithm. The primary outcome is a composite of major complications (i.e. post-pancreatectomy bleeding, new-onset organ failure and death) and will be measured in a sample size of at least 1600 patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Secondary endpoints include the individual components of the primary endpoint and other clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and costs analysis. Follow up will be up to 90 days after pancreatic resection. DISCUSSION: It is hypothesized that a structured nationwide implementation of a dedicated algorithm for early detection and minimally invasive step-up management of postoperative pancreatic fistula will reduce the risk of major complications and death after pancreatic resection, as compared to current practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NL 6671. Registered on 16 December 2017.

Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the most frequent and potentially life-threatening complications following pancreatic resections. Fibrin sealants have been used in some centers to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, the use of fibrin sealants during pancreatic surgery is controversial. This is an update of a Cochrane Review last published in 2018. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, effectiveness, and potential adverse effects of fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery. SEARCH METHODS: We searched trial registers and the following biomedical databases: the Cochrane Library (2019, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1946 to 13 March2019), Embase (1980 to 11 March 2019), Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to 13 March 2019), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) (1978 to 13 March 2019). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials that compared fibrin sealant (fibrin glue or fibrin sealant patch) versus control (no fibrin sealant or placebo) in people undergoing pancreatic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently identified the trials for inclusion, collected the data, and assessed the risk of bias. We performed the meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (or a Peto odds ratio (OR) for very rare outcomes), and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN RESULTS: We included 12 studies involving 1604 participants in the review. Application of fibrin sealants to pancreatic stump closure reinforcement after distal pancreatectomy We included seven studies involving 860 participants: 428 were randomised to the fibrin sealant group and 432 to the control group after distal pancreatectomy. Fibrin sealants may lead to little or no difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula (fibrin sealant 19.3%; control 20.1%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.35; 755 participants; four studies; low-quality evidence). Fibrin sealants may also lead to little or no difference in postoperative mortality (0.3% versus 0.5%; Peto OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.03; 804 participants; six studies; low-quality evidence), or overall postoperative morbidity (28.5% versus 23.2%; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.58; 646 participants; three studies; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether fibrin sealants reduce reoperation rate (2.0% versus 3.8%; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.71; 376 participants; two studies; very low-quality evidence) or length of hospital stay (MD 0.99 days, 95% CI -1.83 to 3.82; 371 participants; two studies; very low-quality evidence). The studies did not report serious adverse events, quality of life, or cost effectiveness. Application of fibrin sealants to pancreatic anastomosis reinforcement after pancreaticoduodenectomy We included four studies involving 393 participants: 186 were randomised to the fibrin sealant group and 207 to the control group after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We are uncertain whether fibrin sealants reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (16.7% versus 11.7%; RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.28 to 4.69; 199 participants; two studies; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether fibrin sealants reduce postoperative mortality (0.5% versus 2.4%; Peto OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.32; 393 participants; four studies; low-quality evidence) or length of hospital stay (MD 0.01 days, 95% CI -3.91 to 3.94; 323 participants; three studies; very low-quality evidence). There is probably little or no difference in overall postoperative morbidity (52.6% versus 50.3%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.24; 323 participants; three studies; moderate-quality evidence) between the groups. We are uncertain whether fibrin sealants reduce reoperation rate (5.2% versus 7.7%; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.66; 323 participants; three studies, very low-quality evidence). The studies did not report serious adverse events, quality of life, or cost effectiveness. Application of fibrin sealants to pancreatic duct occlusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy We included two studies involving 351 participants: 188 were randomised to the fibrin sealant group and 163 to the control group after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Fibrin sealants may lead to little or no difference in postoperative mortality (8.4% versus 6.1%; Peto OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.13; 351 participants; two studies; low-quality evidence) or length of hospital stay (median 16 to 17 days versus 17 days; 351 participants; two studies; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether fibrin sealants reduce overall postoperative morbidity (32.0% versus 27.6%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.02; 351 participants; two studies; very low-quality evidence), or reoperation rate (13.6% versus 16.0%; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.41; 351 participants; two studies; very low-quality evidence). Serious adverse events were reported in one study (169 participants; low-quality evidence): more participants developed diabetes mellitus when fibrin sealants were applied to pancreatic duct occlusion, both at three months' follow-up (33.7% fibrin sealant group versus 10.8% control group; 29 participants versus 9 participants) and 12 months' follow-up (33.7% fibrin sealant group versus 14.5% control group; 29 participants versus 12 participants). The studies did not report postoperative pancreatic fistula, quality of life, or cost effectiveness. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current available evidence, fibrin sealants may have little or no effect on postoperative pancreatic fistula in people undergoing distal pancreatectomy. The effects of fibrin sealants on the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula are uncertain in people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Facing the surgeon's nightmare: Incidence and management of postoperative pancreatic fistulas grade C after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the updated definition of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) grade C represent a rare but feared complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). They can contribute significantly to postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review for all patients who had undergone pancreatic head resection between 2007 and 2016 to identify those who suffered from POPF grade C according to the updated definition of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). RESULTS: A total of 722 patients underwent PD. Twenty-three patients (3.19%) developed a POPF grade C. Cardiovascular diseases, soft pancreatic texture and main pancreatic duct diameter were identified as risk factors (P < .05). Reoperation was necessary in all affected patients on postoperative day 12 ± 9 on average. Mortality was significantly associated with POPF grade C (P < .05) being present in 39.1% (9/23). CONCLUSIONS: POPF grade C after PD remains a serious complication with a high level of morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment is the sole curative therapy and thus the treatment of choice.

Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: Spectrum of Operative Management.

BACKGROUND: Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is common after necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Surgical management may be by internal drainage or left (distal) pancreatectomy. Therapeutic decision-making must consider sinistral portal hypertension, parenchymal volume of disconnected pancreas, and timing relative to definitive management of pancreatic necrosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes after operative management for DPDS. METHODS: All patients with NP undergoing an operation for DPDS were included in the study (2005-2017). Perioperative outcomes and long-term durability were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 647 patients with NP, 299 (46%) had DPDS. Operative management was required in 202/299 (68%) patients with DPDS. Median follow-up was 30 mo (2-165). Definitive operative therapy included internal drainage (n = 111) or resection (n = 91). Time from NP diagnosis to operation was 126 d (20 d to 81 mo). Overall morbidity was 46%. Postoperative length of stay was 7 d (2-97). Readmission was required in 39 patients (19%). Mortality was 2%. Repeat pancreatic intervention was required in 23 patients (11%) at a median of 15 mo (1-98). Repeat pancreatectomy was performed in nine patients and the remaining 14 patients were managed with endoscopic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: DPDS is a common and challenging consequence of NP. Appropriate operation is durable in nearly 90% of patients.

Risk Factors and Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center Experience.

Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains the most frequent complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study was undertaken to explore the risk factors of postoperative PF following PD and discuss the management of PF in our center. A single-center respective study, involving 241 patients who underwent PD between September 2015 and June 2018, was conducted. Differences in the demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables between the group with PF [International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) grade B/C] and the group without PF (no PF and ISGPS grade BL) were evaluated. The diagnosis and grading of PF were in strict accordance with ISGPS. Risk factors were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed that postoperative PF occurred in 50 (20.7%) of the patients; 25 (10.4%) patients had a PF type BL, 46 (19.1%) patients developed a PF type B and 4 (1.6%) had a PF type C. Univariate analysis showed that fasting blood glucose (P=0.02), pancreatic texture (P< 0.001) and pancreatic duct diameter (P=0.01) were correlated with PF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified one independent risk factor for postoperative PF: soft pancreatic texture (OR=3.251, P=0.002). Among the cases, there were three postoperative deaths, giving a 60-day hospital mortality rate of 1.2% (3/241), and the mortality related to PF was 4.0% (2/50). One of the patients died from multiple organ failure caused by postoperative abdominal hemorrhage. In conclusion, soft pancreatic texture is an independent risk factor for PF. Surgeons should be well aware of this risk factor when performing a PD.

Perioperative hydrocortisone treatment reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after open distal pancreatectomy. A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). In a recent RCT on pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), perioperative hydrocortisone (HC) treatment reduced Clavien-Dindo (C-D) III-V complications. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perioperative HC treatment reduces the overall complications and clinically significant POPF after distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS: Fourty consecutive patients undergoing DP were randomized to receive intravenous HC 100mg/placebo every eight hours until the second postoperative day. Thirty-one patients were completed with DP and received HC/placebo every 8 h for two days postoperatively. The primary endpoint was overall complications (C-D III-V) and the secondary endpoint was the development of clinically significant POPF. RESULTS: Pancreatic duct diameter, operative time and blood loss were similar in the groups. Ninety-day mortality was zero. With HC treatment the rates of C-D III-V complications tended to be lower compared to the placebo group (5.9% vs 21.4%, p = 0.034). The rate of grade B/C POPF was significantly reduced with HC treatment compared to the placebo group (5.9% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Perioperative HC treatment may have a favourable effect on overall major complications after open DP. HC treatment reduces the incidence of clinically significant POPF after open DP.

Power of computed-tomography-defined sarcopenia for prediction of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The goal of our study was to evaluate the current approach in prediction of postoperative major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), especially symptomatic pancreatic fistula (POPF), using parameters derived from computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Patients after PD were prospectively collected in a database of the local department of surgery and all patients with CT scans available were assessed in this study. CT parameters were measured at the level of the intervertebral disc L3/L4 and consisted of the areas of the visceral adipose tissue (AVAT), the diameters of the pancreatic parenchyma (DPP) and the pancreatic duct (DPD), the areas of ventral abdominal wall muscle (AMVEN), psoas muscle (AMPSO), paraspinal muscle (AMSPI), total muscle (AMTOT), as well as the mean muscle attenuation (MA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Mann-Whitney-U Test for two independent samples and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients (55 females, 84 males) were included. DPD was 2.9 mm (Range 0.7-10.7) on median and more narrow in patients with complications equal to or greater stadium IIIb (p < 0.04) and severe POPF (p < 0.01). DPP median value was 17 (6.9-37.9) mm and there was no significant difference regarding major complications or POPF. AVAT showed a median value of 127.5 (14.5-473.0) cm2 and was significantly larger in patients with POPF (p < 0.01), but not in cases of major complications (p < 0.06). AMPSO, AMSPI, AMVEN and AMTOT showed no significant differences between major complications and POPF. MA was both lower in groups with major complications (p < 0.01) and POPF (p < 0.01). SMI failed to differentiate between patients with or without major complications or POPF. CONCLUSION: Besides the known factors visceral obesity and narrowness of the pancreatic duct, the mean muscle attenuation can easily be examined on routine preoperative CT scans and seems to be promising parameter to predict postoperative complications and POPF.

Pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is probably unrelated to the stapler size but to the drainage modality and significantly decreased with a small suction drain.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) are not well known and were studied, including the stapler cartridge size and drainage modality. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2016, 181 LDP were performed and the pancreas was sectioned by stapler in 130 patients (72%). Patients received white (2.5 mm), blue (3.5 mm), or green (4.1 mm) staplers and the size was not based on any pre or peroperative randomization. As primary analysis of the first 84 patients (28 in each group) showed no effect of stapler size on POPF, we decided to use the white (total = 47) or blue and finally the blue (total = 55) of medium size for standardization. Drainage was obtained by multi-tubular drain (first, 79) and a small suction drain (last, 102). Risk factors of POPF were studied and grades B and C were compared to grade A or no POPF. RESULTS: POPF (n = 66; 36%) was of grade A (n = 25, 14%), grade B (n = 32, 18%), and grade C (n = 9, 5%). The comparison of the three groups of staplers showed that the blue stapler was used more with a small suction drain (85 vs 23%, p < 0.0001), had lower rate of grade B POPF (p = 0.028), and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, only the use of a small suction drain was associated with significant decrease in grades B and C POPF (6 vs 44%, odds ratio 7.385 (1.919-28.418); p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of POPF following LDP is influenced by the type of drainage alone and is significantly decreased with a small suction drain.

Outcomes of Infected versus Symptomatic Sterile Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis Treated with a Minimally Invasive Therapy.

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and if infected, typically necessitates intervention. Clinical outcomes of infected WON have been described as poorer than those of symptomatic sterile WON. With the evolution of minimally invasive therapy, we sought to compare outcomes of infected to symptomatic sterile WON. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining patients who were undergoing dual-modality drainage as minimally invasive therapy for WON at a high-volume tertiary pancreatic center. The main outcome measures included mortality with a drain in place, length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit, and development of pancreatic fistulae. Results: Of the 211 patients in our analysis, 98 had infected WON. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Patients with infected WON trended toward higher mortality although not statistically significant (4.1% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Patients with infected WON had longer length of hospitalization (29.8 days vs 17.3 days, p<0.01), and developed more spontaneous pancreatic fistulae (23.5% vs 7.8%, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that infected WON was associated with higher odds of spontaneous pancreatic fistula formation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.85). Conclusions: This study confirms that infected WON has worse outcomes than sterile WON but also demonstrates that WON, once considered a significant cause of death, can be treated with good outcomes using minimally invasive therapy.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula: Microbial growth determines outcome.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a dangerous complication in pancreatic surgery. This study assessed the impact of microbiologic pathogens detected in postoperative pancreatic fistula on clinical outcomes after partial pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: Microorganisms in postoperative pancreatic fistula were identified by microbiologic analyses from abdominal drains or intraoperative swabs during relaparotomy. Demographic, operative, and microbiologic data, as well as postoperative outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Of 2,752 patients undergoing partial pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, 256 patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery [ISGPS] grades B and C) were identified (9.3%) and microbiologic cultures were positive in 210 patients (82.0%), with a higher rate after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (95.8%) than after distal pancreatectomy (64.3%; P < .001). Microbiologic spectra differed distinctively between partial pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Detection of microorganisms in postoperative pancreatic fistula resulted in a higher morbidity and mortality, including postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (42.4% vs 21.7%; P = .009), sepsis (38.1% vs 6.5%; P < .001), wound infection (30.0% vs 6.5%; P = .001), reoperation (48.1% vs 10.9%; P < .001), hospital stay (median 42 vs 26 days; P < .001), and overall 90-day mortality (19.5% vs 4.3%; P = .013) and was identified as an independent risk factor for sepsis, wound infection, and reoperation in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Detection of microorganisms in postoperative pancreatic fistula is frequent after pancreatic resection and indicates a turning point in the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula into a life-threatening condition. Whether early anti-infective therapy in combination with interventional measures or a surgical reintervention are warranted, has yet to be elucidated.

Evaluation of P-POSSUM Risk Scoring System in Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Background: POSSUM and P-POSSUM are risk scores recommended by ERAS Society for the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing major surgery. Methods: This study includes 113 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy performed in a single centre between July 2013-December 2015. Patients data were prospectively collected using Excel 2009 and retrospectively analysed with R v3.2.4 software. Biological status score, surgical severity score and risk scores for complications and death were calculated using: http://www.riskprediction. org.uk/index-pp.php. Results: Morbidity rate was 61,95%: 19,47% general complications, 14,16% wound infections and 28,32% PD specific complications (11,5% POPF; 8,85% DGE and 6,19% PPH). Comparing the observed and estimated morbidity and mortality, we obtained statistical significant results (p=0,05 and p=0,03, respectivelly). When we considered only specific PD complications and subsequent mortality, there was no longer significant difference between observed and estimated values (p=0,8 and p=0,86).The under ROC curve aria was 0,61 for morbidity and 0,64 for specific PD morbidity, respectively 0,61 for mortality and 0,68 for specific PD complications related mortality. CONCLUSION: P-POSSUM represents a useful tool for appreciating the complication and death risk after PD, but better results could be obtain by considering also specific PD risk factors.

Pancreatic stump closure using only stapler is associated with high postoperative fistula rate after minimal invasive surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy (DP). The aim of the present study is to determine the risk factors that can lead to POPF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted between January 2008 and December 2012. A total of 96 patients who underwent DP were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 24 patients (25%) underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and 72 patients (75%) open surgery. The overall morbidity rate was 51% (49/96). POPF (32/96, 33.3%) was the most common postoperative complication. Grade B fistula (18/32, 56.2%) was the most common fistula type according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula definition. POPF rate was significantly higher in the minimally invasive surgery group (50%, p=0.046). POPF rate was 58.6% (17/29) in patients whose pancreatic stump closure was performed with only stapler, whereas POPF rate was 3.6% (1/28) in the group where the stump was closed with stapler plus oversewing sutures. Both minimally invasive surgery (OR: 0.286, 95% CI: 0.106-0.776, p=0.014) and intraoperative blood transfusion (OR: 4.210, 95% CI: 1.155-15.354, p=0.029) were detected as independent risk factors for POPF in multi-variety analysis. CONCLUSION: LDP is associated with a higher risk of POPF when stump closure is performed with only staplers. Intraoperative blood transfusion is another risk factor for POPF. On the other hand, oversewing sutures to the stapler line reduces the risk of POPF.

An end-to-side suspender pancreaticojejunostomy: A new invagination pancreaticojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a severe complication of the pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, we introduced a method of suspender pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) to the PD. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed various risk factors for complications after PD. We also introduced and assessed the suspender PJ to demonstrate its advantages. METHODS: Data from 335 patients with various periampullary lesions, who underwent the Whipple procedure (classic Whipple procedure or pylorus-preserving) PD by either traditional end-to-side invagination PJ or suspender PJ, were analyzed. The correlation between either perioperative or postoperative complications and corresponding PD approaches was evaluated by univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients received the traditional end-to-side invagination PJ, and 188 patients were given the suspender PJ. Overall, 51.9% patients had various complications after PD. The mortality rate was 2.4%. The POPF incidence in patients who received the suspender PJ was 5.3%, which was significantly lower than those who received the traditional end-to-side invagination PJ (18.4%) (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that PJ approach and the pancreas texture were significantly associated with the POPF incidence rate (P < 0.01). POPF was a risk factor for both postoperative abdominal cavity infection (OR = 8.34, 95% CI: 3.99-17.42, P < 0.001) and abdominal cavity hemorrhage (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 1.92-12.33, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the impact of the pancreas texture was a major risk factor for pancreatic leakage after a PD. The suspender PJ can be easily accomplished and widely applied and can effectively decrease the impact of the pancreas texture on pancreatic fistula after a PD and leads to a lower POPF incidence rate.

A modified single-loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Double-loop (DL) reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), diverting pancreatic from biliary secretions, has been reported to reduce rates and severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) compared to single loop (SL) reconstruction at the price of prolonged operative duration. This study investigated the feasibility of a new reconstruction method combining the advantages of DL with the simplicity of SL in patients with high-risk pancreas. METHODS: A modified single-loop (mSL) reconstruction was used in patients undergoing PD with a soft pancreatic remnant and a pancreatic duct smaller than 3 mm (n = 50). The loop between the pancreatic and the biliary anastomoses was left longer and a side-to-side jejunojejunal anastomosis was performed between them at the lowest point to promote isolated flow of pancreatic and biliary secretions. Rate and severity of POPF, mortality, duration of surgery, and POPF-associated morbidity were compared to those of 50 matched patients with SL and 25 patients with DL reconstruction. RESULTS: Duration of surgery was 57 min longer for DL, but equal for mSL and SL. The POPF rate did not differ between the three groups. The severity of POPF was more pronounced in the SL group (62% grade C: p = 0.011). Mortality and major morbidity were lower and hospital stay shorter in the mSL and DL groups compared to the SL group. CONCLUSIONS: The new mSL reconstruction was safer than conventional SL and faster to perform than DL reconstruction in patients with a high-risk pancreas. It did not influence the rate of POPF, but reduced its severity, leading to less major morbidity and mortality.

Short-term outcomes and risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreatic enucleation: A single-center experience of 142 patients.

BACKGROUND: Enucleation is increasingly used for benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms. Enucleation preserves the pancreatic parenchyma as well as decreases the risk of long-term endocrine and exocrine dysfunction, but may be associated with a higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this study was to assess short-term outcomes, in particular, POPF. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from all 142 patients who underwent pancreatic enucleation between 2009 and 2014 in our institution were analyzed. RESULTS: Lesions were most frequently located in the head and uncinate process of the pancreas (60.6%), and the most common types were neuroendocrine neoplasms (52.1%). Overall morbidity was 66%, mainly due to POPF (53.5%), and severe morbidity was only 8.4%, including one death (0.7%). Clinical POPF (Grade B or C) occurred in 22 patients (15.5%). Independent risk factors for clinical POPF were age ≥60 years, an episode of acute pancreatitis, and cystic morphology. Tumor size, coverage, histological differentiation, and prolonged operative time were not associated with the risk of POPF. CONCLUSIONS: Enucleation is a safe and feasible procedure for benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms. The rate of clinical POPF is acceptable, and clinical POPF occurs more frequently in elderly patients (≥60 years of age), patients with cystic neoplasms, or patients with an episode of acute pancreatitis.

Total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy decreases incidence of pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication and results in prolonged hospitalization and high mortality. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the outcomes of PD between patients who underwent total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (Group A) vs those who underwent conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (Group B). The primary endpoint was the incidence of pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality rates. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were included in this study. The POPF rate was significantly lower in Group A than that in Group B (4.8% vs 16.7%, P<0.05). About 38.3% patients in Group B developed one or more complications; this rate was 14.3% in Group A (P<0.01). The wound/abdominal infection rate was also much higher in Group B than that in Group A (20.0% vs 6.3%, P<0.05). Furthermore, the average hospital stays of the two groups were 18 days in Group A, and 24 days in Group B, respectively (P<0.001). However, there was no difference in the probability of mortality, biliary leakage, delayed gastric emptying, and pulmonary infection between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy is a safe and effective method for pancreaticojejunostomy in PD.