Rosuvastatin in hemodialysis: short-term effects on lipids and C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: Patients on regular hemodialysis present high cardiovascular mortality. Uremic dyslipidemia and inflammation take part in the etiology of atherosclerosis. Rosuvastatin calcium has not been studied in patients on dialysis to date. We sought to evaluate the results of rosuvastatin therapy regarding lipids, lipoproteins and a marker of inflammation in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 59 patients on hemodialysis (31 in the placebo group, and 28 taking rosuvastatin 10 mg/day) were followed for 3 months. Lipids, lipoproteins and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured at baseline, 30 days and 3 months. RESULTS: In the rosuvastatin group, there was a significant decrease from baseline to the study end in total cholesterol (163+/-53 mg/dL to 142+/-43 mg/dL; p<0.05), in LDL cholesterol (90+/-39 mg/dL to 69+/-32 mg/dL; p<0.05) and in non-HDL cholesterol (121+/-46 mg/dL to 99+/-39 mg/dL; p<0.05). In the placebo group, no significant decrease was observed. High-sensitivity CRP was lower in the rosuvastatin than in the placebo group at 3 months (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin calcium at 10 mg/day was effective in lowering total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and hs-CRP in hemodialysis patients.

Efficacy and safety of ABT-335 (fenofibric acid) in combination with rosuvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia: a phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new formulation of fenofibric acid (ABT-335) co-administered with 2 doses of rosuvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study, a total of 1445 patients with LDL-C>or=130 mg/dL, TG>or=150 mg/dL, and HDL-C<40 mg/dL (<50 mg/dL for women) were randomized to either ABT-335 (135 mg), rosuvastatin (10, 20, or 40 mg), or ABT-335+rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg, and treated for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy comparisons were mean percent change in HDL-C and TG (ABT-335+rosuvastatin vs. corresponding dose of rosuvastatin), and LDL-C (ABT-335+rosuvastatin vs. ABT-335). RESULTS: Combination therapy with ABT-335+rosuvastatin 10 mg resulted in significantly (p<0.001) greater improvements in HDL-C (20.3% vs. 8.5%) and TG (-47.1% vs. -24.4%) compared to rosuvastatin 10 mg; and LDL-C (-37.2% vs. -6.5%) compared to ABT-335. Similarly, significantly (p<0.001) greater improvements were observed with ABT-335+rosuvastatin 20 mg in HDL-C (19.0% vs. 10.3%) and TG (-42.9% vs. -25.6%) compared to rosuvastatin 20 mg; and LDL-C (-38.8% vs. -6.5%) compared to ABT-335 monotherapy. Greater improvements in multiple secondary endpoints were noted with combination therapy compared to prespecified monotherapies. Both combination therapy doses were generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with ABT-335 and rosuvastatin monotherapies. No rhabdomyolysis or unexpected hepatic, renal, or muscle safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: In patients with mixed dyslipidemia, combination therapy with ABT-335+rosuvastatin resulted in more effective control of multiple lipid parameters than either monotherapy alone, with a safety profile similar to both monotherapies. This combination may be an appropriate therapeutic option to treat mixed dyslipidemia.

McArdle disease with rhabdomyolysis induced by rosuvastatin: case report.

The rosuvastatin inducing rhabdomyolysis in McArdle disease (MD) has not been reported to date. A 35-years-old man had exercise intolerance, muscular fatigue and cramps during physical activity since infancy. He presented severe rhabdomyolysis episode with seizure and coma after use of rosuvastatin. The investigation showed increased serum creatine-kinase levels and the forearm ischemic exercise did not increase venous lactate. The muscle biopsy showed subsarcolemmal and central accumulation of glycogen and absence of the myophosphorylase enzyme. The statin induced myopathy is discussed and the danger of its use in MD is emphasized.

McArdle disease with rhabdomyolysis induced by rosuvastatin: case report

The rosuvastatin inducing rhabdomyolysis in McArdle disease (MD) has not been reported to date. A 35-years-old man had exercise intolerance, muscular fatigue and cramps during physical activity since infancy. He presented severe rhabdomyolysis episode with seizure and coma after use of rosuvastatin. The investigation showed increased serum creatinekinase levels and the forearm ischemic exercise did not increased venous lactate. The muscle biopsy showed subsarcolemmal and central acummulation of glycogen and absence of the myophosphorylase enzyme. The statin induced myopathy is discussed and the danger of its use in MD is emphasized.

Rosuvastatina induzindo rabdomiólise na doença de McArdle (MD) não foi relatada até o momento. Descrevemos o caso de um homem de 35 anos que desde a infância apresentava sintomas de intolerância aos exercícios, fadiga muscular e cãibras durante o esforço físico, porém após o uso de rosuvastatina apresentou episódio de rabdomiólise com crises convulsivas e coma. A investigação mostrou creatinoquinase sérica elevada e teste do esforço isquêmico sem aumento no lactato venoso. A biópsia muscular revelou acúmulo central e subsarcolemal de glicogênio nas fibras e ausência da enzima miofosforilase. Discutimos as estatinas induzindo miopatia, enfatizando o risco do seu uso na MD.

Tratamento hipolipemiante em situações especiais: pós-transplante e/ou terapia imunossupressora / Hypolipidemic treatment under special conditions: posttransplant and/or immunosupressive therapy

Existem dados limitados sobre o uso concomitante de agentes hipolipemiantes e drogas imunosupressoras. As melhores evidências provêm do uso de estatinas e ciclosporina. Em termos farmacodinâmicos, estas duas drogas têm substratos diferentes. No tocante a farmacocinética, as estatinas não modificam as concentrações plasmáticas de ciclosporina. Entretanto, quando combinada a qualquer estatina, um controle rigoroso dos níveis de ciclosporina é recomendado, levando-se em conta o seu estreito intervalo terapêutico. Ciclosporina afeta a área sob a curva de muitas estatinas, pela inibição do CYP450 3A4, aumentando a exposição sistêmica dessas drogas. Pravastatina se apresenta como o composto de maior segurança, uma vez que é glucuronidado. A área sob a curva para as outras estatinas (sinvastatina, lovastatina, atorvastatina, cerivastatina e rosuvastatina) pode aumentar em graus variáveis de acordo com o seu sítio de metabolização, extração hepática pelo OATP-transportador, secreção biliar, excreção renal, e extrusão da droga pelo sistema MDR.

[Hypolipidemic treatment under special conditions: posttransplant and/or immunosuppressive therapy]. / Tratamento hipolipemiante em situações especiais--pós-transplante e/ou terapia imunossupressora.

There are limited data regarding the use of hypolipidemic agents concomitantly with immunosuppressive drugs. Best evidence is provided for the use of statins and cyclosporine. In terms of pharmacodynamics, these two drugs have different substrates. In respect to pharmacokinetics, statins usually do not modify serum concentrations of cyclosporine, however when combined with any statin a careful monitoring of cyclosporine levels is recommended, due to a narrow therapeutic window of the immunosuppressive agent. Conversely, cyclosporine does affect the area under the curve for many statins, by inhibiting the CYP450 3A4, thus increasing systemic exposure to statins. Pravastatin appears to be the safest compound, once it is glucuronized. The area under the curve for the other statins (simvastatin, lovastatin, atorvastatin, cerivastatin, and rosuvastatin) can be increased in variable degrees according to the site of metabolization, liver extraction by OATP-C transporter, biliary secretion, renal excretion, and drug extrusion by the MDR system.