The Struggle for Equity: An Examination of Surgical Services at Two NGO Hospitals in Rural Haiti.

BACKGROUND: Health systems must deliver care equitably in order to serve the poor. Both L'Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS) and L'Hôpital Bon Sauveur (HBS) have longstanding commitments to provide equitable surgical care in rural Haiti. HAS charges fees that demonstrate a preference for the rural population near the hospital, with free care available for the poorest. HBS does not charge fees. The two hospitals are otherwise similar in surgical capacity and rural location. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operative case-logs at both hospitals from June 1 to Aug 31, 2012. The records were compared by total number of operations, geographic distribution of patients and number of elective operations. Using geography as a proxy for poverty, we analyzed the equity achieved under the financial systems at both hospitals. RESULTS: Patients from the rural service area received 86% of operations at HAS compared to 38% at HBS (p < 0.001). Only 5% of all operations at HAS were performed on patients from outside the service area for elective conditions compared to 47% at HBS (p < 0.001). Within its rural service area, HAS performed fewer operations on patients from the most destitute areas compared to other locations (40.3 vs. 101.3 operations/100,000 population, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using fees as part of an equity strategy will likely disadvantage the poorest patients, while providing care without fees may encourage patients to travel from urban areas that contain other hospitals. Health systems striving to serve the poor should continually evaluate and seek to improve equity, even within systems that provide free care.

Quantifying the reduction in nonmedical costs after the introduction of a rural county hospital in Ecuador.

OBJECTIVE: This study attempts to quantify the impact of the introduction of local second-level health services on nonmedical costs (NMCs) for residents of the rural Ecuadorian county of La Maná. METHODS: NMCs for patients accessing second-level health care were assessed by using a quasi-experimental pre- and postintervention study design. In 2007, before local second-level health care services existed, and then in 2008, after the introduction of second-level health care services in the form of a county hospital, 508 patients from the county who sought second-level health care were interviewed. RESULTS: Mean NMCs per patient per illness episode were US$ 93.58 before the county hospital opened and US$ 12.62 after it opened. This difference was largely due to reductions in transport costs (US$ 50.01 vs. US$ 4.28) and food costs (US$ 25.38 vs. US$ 7.28) (P < 0.001 for each category). CONCLUSIONS: NMCs can be decreased sevenfold with the introduction of a county hospital in a rural province previously lacking second-level health care. Introduction of rural second-level health care reduces financial barriers and thus may increase access to these health services for poorer patients in rural communities.

Quantifying the reduction in nonmedical costs after the introduction of a rural county hospital in Ecuador / Cuantificación de la reducción de los costos no médicos mediante la apertura de un hospital en un cantón rural del Ecuador

OBJECTIVE: This study attempts to quantify the impact of the introduction of local second-level health services on nonmedical costs (NMCs) for residents of the rural Ecuadorian county of La Maná. METHODS: NMCs for patients accessing second-level health care were assessed by using a quasi-experimental pre- and postintervention study design. In 2007, before local second-level health care services existed, and then in 2008, after the introduction of second-level health care services in the form of a county hospital, 508 patients from the county who sought second-level health care were interviewed. RESULTS: Mean NMCs per patient per illness episode were US$ 93.58 before the county hospital opened and US$ 12.62 after it opened. This difference was largely due to reductions in transport costs (US$ 50.01 vs. US$ 4.28) and food costs (US$ 25.38 vs. US$ 7.28) (P < 0.001 for each category). CONCLUSIONS: NMCs can be decreased sevenfold with the introduction of a county hospital in a rural province previously lacking second-level health care. Introduction of rural second-level health care reduces financial barriers and thus may increase access to these health services for poorer patients in rural communities.

OBJETIVO: Este estudio tiene por objeto cuantificar la repercusión de la introducción de servicios de salud locales de segundo nivel sobre los costos no médicos para los residentes del cantón rural ecuatoriano de La Maná. MÉTODOS: Se evaluaron los costos no médicos de los pacientes que tuvieron acceso a atención médica de segundo nivel mediante un estudio cuasiexperimental de análisis previo y posterior a la intervención. En el 2007 (antes de que existieran servicios locales de este tipo) y en el 2008 (después de la introducción de atención médica de segundo nivel representada por el hospital del cantón) se entrevistaron a 508 pacientes del cantón que requirieron atención médica de segundo nivel. RESULTADOS: Los costos no médicos medios por paciente y por episodio de enfermedad fueron de US$ 93,58 antes de la apertura del hospital local y de US$ 12,62 después de la inauguración del establecimiento. Esta diferencia se debió en gran parte a la reducción de los costos de transporte (US$ 50,01 frente a US$ 4,28) y de los costos de alimentación (US$ 25,38 frente a US$ 7,28) (P < 0,001 para cada categoría). CONCLUSIONES: Es posible reducir los costos no médicos a una séptima parte mediante la apertura de un hospital local en una zona rural que anteriormente carecía de atención médica de segundo nivel. La introducción de atención médica de segundo nivel en una zona rural reduce los obstáculos financieros y, por lo tanto, podría aumentar el acceso a estos servicios de salud para los pacientes más pobres en las comunidades rurales.

Making secondary care a primary concern: the rural hospital in Ecuador / Hacer de la atención secundaria una preocupación primaria: los hospitales rurales en Ecuador

En Ecuador, el acceso de la población rural a servicios adecuados de atención secundaria de salud se ha hecho cada vez más difícil. A pesar de que los sectores público y privado han acertado en dedicar esfuerzos a la atención primaria y a la salud pública, la mayoría de las poblaciones rurales no tienen acceso a una adecuada atención secundaria. Por lo general, los modelos tradicionales de atención médica secundaria en zonas rurales no se han adaptado a las nuevas situaciones, como la tendencia general a la descentralización, el énfasis en el desarrollo de capacidades locales, el antagonismo entre el acceso universal y la autonomía financiera, las alternativas financieras innovadoras y los recién llegados médicos de familia. En 2001, la organización no gubernamental con sede en los Estados Unidos de América Andean Health & Development (Saludesa en Ecuador) inauguró un hospital rural de 17 camas, construido conjuntamente con el municipio local y el Ministerio de Salud de Ecuador. El hospital atiende a una comunidad rural de 50000 personas que antes no tenían acceso local a servicios secundarios de salud. Los esfuerzos de AHD/Saludesa para desarrollar una red autosostenible pública/privada de atención primaria/secundaria de salud y de alta calidad han generado una considerable experiencia en la administración de un hospital rural. El proyecto piloto de AHD se concentró en un hospital rural y logró su autosostenibilidad total en 2007. Esto se logró mediante una combinación de mecanismos financieros, entre ellos la venta de paquetes prepagados de atención sanitaria, un contrato con el Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social, contribuciones municipales y el pago tradicional por los servicios.

The impact of HIV infection in a rural hospital in Haiti.

To assess the impact of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection on the patients treated at the Medicine Department of the Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS) in Haiti and the economic costs to this institution that their medical care caused, a group of HIV infected patients was followed and compared to a control group of non-infected patients. Infected patients had a significantly higher number of diagnoses suggestive of HIV infection and of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and also had a higher rate of mortality during the follow-up period. Infected patients attended the out-patient Medicine Clinic and were hospitalized more frequently than non-infected patients. The yearly cost of treating an HIV patient was estimated to be about US $860. We suggest that a wider use of HIV testing might be beneficial among patients such as ours for providing adequate care for them if the necessary resources are made available.

Assessing hospital administrators' responses to prospective payment. A case study in New Mexico.

Few studies have assessed the relationship between hospital administrators' efforts at planning and subsequent performance of health care organizations. Nonetheless, planning is viewed as an important mechanism for aligning health services delivery efforts with community needs and operating constraints. When prospective payment (PPS) was first introduced, hospital administrators had little choice other than to plan how they would respond to the new reimbursement policies. However, it is unclear whether they actively undertook planning in an effort to address prospective payment and related pressures. This article presents a case study of rural New Mexico hospital administrators' efforts to respond to prospective payment. Two dimensions of planning effort by administrators--intensity and formality--are analyzed within rural hospitals during the PPS transition (i.e., 1983 to 1987) and after its full implementation (i.e., since 1988). The findings suggest that planning intensity during the PPS transition is associated with higher performance; notably, higher net patient care revenues, lower costs per patient day, higher operating margins, higher net income, and higher planning effectiveness. However, the strength of these associations weakened as PPS was fully implemented. Given the exploratory nature of this evaluative case study, the results should be viewed as preliminary until confirmed by larger studies. The implications for research that evaluates planning-performance relationships in the health care field are discussed.

Does planning pay off? A look at the experience of New Mexico's rural hospitals.

When Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS) was implemented, hospitals faced the prospect of diminishing reimbursement. Added to other fundamental changes involving medical practice, consumerism, competition, and medical technology, hospitals had significant incentives to focus more attention on strategic planning. This article examines how rural hospitals altered their strategic planning in response to PPS and the extent to which planning is related to better performance. It presents results from a case study of rural New Mexico hospitals. The implications of these results for other hospitals are discussed by the authors.

Responses to prospective payment by rural New Mexico hospitals.

A cross-sectional study is used to determine how rural New Mexico hospitals altered service diversification, inpatient service emphasis, and service promotion during Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS) transition and posttransition phases. Results suggest that the hospitals implemented distinct strategies in response to PPS. The posttransition strategies were examined for their association with improved revenue and utilization indicators. Few of the service diversification and promotional strategies were consistent predictors of performance. Emphasis on fine-tuning inpatient services was the most promising predictor of higher utilization and revenue measures. The implications for other rural hospitals are discussed.

Efectos del centralismo a nivel operativo, área programática nº37

Efectos que produce la centralización de recursos en la dinámica operatoria de las acciones de salud en el Hospital General de Makallé. Planteo de la situación actual. Análisis del suministro de insumos, de equipamientos, necesidades de reparaciones, recursos humanos

Efectos del centralismo a nivel operativo, área programática nº37

Efectos que produce la centralización de recursos en la dinámica operatoria de las acciones de salud en el Hospital General de Makallé. Planteo de la situación actual. Análisis del suministro de insumos, de equipamientos, necesidades de reparaciones, recursos humanos