Are BDNF and Stress Levels Related to Antidepressant Response?

Antidepressant response is a multifactorial process related to biological and environmental factors, where brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may play an important role in modulating depressive and anxious symptoms. We aimed to analyze how BDNF impacts antidepressant response, considering the levels of anxiety. METHODS: A total of 40 depressed adults were included. We evaluated initial serum BDNF, anxiety through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the severity of depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Participants received antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks, and response to treatment was evaluated according to the final HDRS scores. RESULTS: Basal BDNF was higher in responders compared to non-responder depressed patients, in addition to being inversely associated with the severity of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline BDNF serum is an adequate predictive factor for response to antidepressant treatment with SSRI, with lower pre-treatment levels of BDNF associated with higher anxiety symptoms after treatment. Stress levels could influence the response to treatment, but its association was not conclusive.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Sertraline in Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders.

This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of sertraline in Mexican patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Fifty-nine patients (13 to 76 years old) treated with doses of sertraline between 12.5 and 100 mg/day were included. Plasma sertraline concentrations were determined in blood samples and five of the main substances of abuse were determined by rapid tests in urine samples. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacogenetic factors were also evaluated. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software with first-order conditional estimation method. A one-compartment model with proportional residual error adequately described the sertraline concentrations versus time. CYP2D6*2 polymorphism and CYP2C19 phenotypes significantly influenced sertraline clearance, which had a population mean value of 66 L/h in the final model. The absorption constant and volume of distribution were fixed at 0.855 1/h and 20.2 L/kg, respectively. The model explained 11.3% of the interindividual variability in sertraline clearance. The presence of the CYP2D6*2 polymorphism caused a 23.1% decrease in sertraline clearance, whereas patients with intermediate and poor phenotype of CYP2C19 showed 19.06% and 48.26% decreases in sertraline clearance, respectively. The model was internally validated by bootstrap and visual predictive check. Finally, stochastic simulations were performed to propose dosing regimens to achieve therapeutic levels that contribute to improving treatment response.

The beneficial effect of fluoxetine on behavioral and cognitive changes in chronic experimental Chagas disease unveils the role of serotonin fueling astrocyte infection by Trypanosoma cruzi.

BACKGROUND: In Chagas disease (CD), a neglected tropical disease caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, the development of mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, and memory loss may be underpinned by social, psychological, and biological stressors. Here, we investigated biological factors underlying behavioral changes in a preclinical model of CD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In T. cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice, a kinetic study (5 to 150 days postinfection, dpi) using standardized methods revealed a sequential onset of behavioral changes: reduced innate compulsive behavior, followed by anxiety and depressive-like behavior, ending with progressive memory impairments. Hence, T. cruzi-infected mice were treated (120 to 150 dpi) with 10 mg/Kg/day of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (Fx), an antidepressant that favors neuroplasticity. Fx therapy reversed the innate compulsive behavior loss, anxiety, and depressive-like behavior while preventing or reversing memory deficits. Biochemical, histological, and parasitological analyses of the brain tissue showed increased levels of the neurotransmitters GABA/glutamate and lipid peroxidation products and decreased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the absence of neuroinflammation at 150 dpi. Fx therapy ameliorated the neurochemical changes and reduced parasite load in the brain tissue. Next, using the human U-87 MG astroglioma cell line, we found no direct effect of Fx on parasite load. Crucially, serotonin/5-HT (Ser/5-HT) promoted parasite uptake, an effect increased by prior stimulation with IFNγ and TNF but abrogated by Fx. Also, Fx blocked the cytokine-driven Ser/5-HT-promoted increase of nitric oxide and glutamate levels in infected cells. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We bring the first evidence of a sequential onset of behavioral changes in T. cruzi-infected mice. Fx therapy improves behavioral and biological changes and parasite control in the brain tissue. Moreover, in the central nervous system, cytokine-driven Ser/5-HT consumption may favor parasite persistence, disrupting neurotransmitter balance and promoting a neurotoxic environment likely contributing to behavioral and cognitive disorders.

Central Neuromodulators in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Why, How, and When.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is responsive to treatments using central neuromodulators. Central neuromodulators work by enhancing the synaptic transmission of 5-hydroxytryptamine, noradrenalin, and dopamine, achieving a slower regulation or desensitization of their postsynaptic receptors. Central neuromodulators act on receptors along the brain-gut axis, so they are useful in treating psychiatric comorbidities, modifying gut motility, improving central downregulation of visceral signals, and enhancing neurogenesis in patients with IBS. Choosing a central neuromodulator for treating IBS should be according to the pharmacological properties and predominant symptoms. The first-line treatment for pain management in IBS is using tricyclic antidepressants. An alternative for pain management is the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are useful when symptoms of anxiety and hypervigilance are dominant but are not helpful for treating abdominal pain. The predominant bowel habit is helpful when choosing a neuromodulator to treat IBS; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors help constipation, not pain, but may cause diarrhea; tricyclic antidepressants help diarrhea but may cause constipation. A clinical response may occur in 6-8 weeks, but long-term treatment (usually 6-12 months) is required after the initial response to prevent relapse. Augmentation therapy may be beneficial when the therapeutic effect of the first agent is incomplete or associated with side effects. It is recommended to reduce the dose of the first agent and add a second complementary treatment. This may include an atypical antipsychotic or brain-gut behavioral treatment. When tapering central neuromodulators, the dose should be reduced slowly over 4 weeks but may take longer when discontinuation effects occur.

The effect of paroxetine on heart rate variability in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The impacts of antidepressant pharmacotherapies on cardiovascular risk are unclear. We completed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the effect of paroxetine on heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: The searches were accomplished via EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed (using the National Library of Medicine), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We included non-blind, single, or double-blind randomized control trials in patients older than 18 diagnosed with MDD. Paroxetine needs to be enforced as a chronic therapeutic medication. We included individual studies that investigated resting HRV. RESULTS: We documented 402 studies, only following screening and eligibility phases; only six were included (five studies in the meta-analysis). No significant change was noticed for the SDNN index: subtotal = 8.23 [CI: -2.17, 18.63], p = 0.12, I2 = 54 % (very low quality of evidence). A significant change was distinguished for the LF index: subtotal = 0.74 [CI: 0.33, 1.15], p = 0.0004, I2 = 0 % (low quality of evidence). A significant alteration was perceived for the HF index: subtotal = 0.33 [CI: 0.06, 0.6], p = 0.02, I2 = 0 % (low quality of evidence). CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis demonstrated that paroxetine could advance HRV in MDD patients. Nevertheless, our supposition is founded only on statistical analysis and the very low quality of evidence breakdown reinforces the necessity for further studies to confirm or reject this theory.

An update on the pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of dysthymic disorder: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Longer treatment times, more comorbidity, more severe impairments in social, psychological, and emotional functioning, increased healthcare use, and more hospitalizations are all factors that are related to dysthymia. Given the significant prevalence of dysthymia (including persistent depressive disorder) worldwide, its comorbidity with several mental disorders, and the detrimental effects of these comorbidities, it is important to conduct a systematic review to compare the effects of pharmacological acute and maintenance treatments for dysthymia with placebo and standard care in the last 10 years, based on the publication of DSM5. AREAS COVERED: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to assess the effects of pharmacological acute and maintenance treatments for dysthymia in comparison with placebo and treatment as usual. EXPERT OPINION: Our review shows that SSRIs and SNRIs present efficacy for dysthymia treatment, and L-Acetylcarnitine should be investigated further for this condition in elderly patients. The comparison of antidepressant medication versus placebo showed coherent results based on three studies favoring pharmacotherapy as an effective treatment for participants with dysthymia. However, the scarcity of research on continuation and maintenance therapy in people with dysthymia highlights the need for more primary research.

Placebo response in trials with patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress disorders across the lifespan: a three-level meta-analysis.

QUESTION: Randomised controlled trials assessing treatments for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress-related disorders often present high placebo response rates in placebo groups. Understanding the placebo response is essential in accurately estimating the benefits of pharmacological agents; nevertheless, no studies have evaluated the placebo response across these disorders using a lifespan approach. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane, websites of regulatory agencies and international registers from inception to 9 September 2022. The primary outcome was the aggregate measure of internalising symptoms of participants in the placebo arms of randomised controlled trials designed to assess the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in individuals diagnosed with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive or stress-related disorders. The secondary outcomes were placebo response and remission rates. Data were analysed through a three-level meta-analysis. FINDINGS: We analysed 366 outcome measures from 135 studies (n=12 583). We found a large overall placebo response (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-1.11, 95% CI -1.22 to -1.00). The average response and remission rates in placebo groups were 37% and 24%, respectively. Larger placebo response was associated with a diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, when compared with panic, social anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder (SMD range, 0.40-0.49), and with absence of a placebo lead-in period (SMD=0.44, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.78). No significant differences were found in placebo response across age groups. We found substantial heterogeneity and moderate risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Placebo response is substantial in SSRI and SNRI trials for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress-related disorders. Clinicians and researchers should accurately interpret the benefits of pharmacological agents in contrast to placebo response. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017069090.

Brazilian Research Consortium on Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders guidelines for the treatment of adult obsessive-compulsive disorder. Part I: pharmacological treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence-based pharmacological treatments and provide guidance on clinical interventions for adult patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHODS: The American Psychiatric Association (APA) guidelines for the treatment of OCD (2013) were updated with a systematic review assessing the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for adult OCD, comprising monotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), clomipramine, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and augmentation strategies with clomipramine, antipsychotics, and glutamate-modulating agents. We searched for the literature published from 2013-2020 in five databases, considering the design of the study, primary outcome measures, types of publication, and language. Selected articles had their quality assessed with validated tools. Treatment recommendations were classified according to levels of evidence developed by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA). RESULTS: We examined 57 new studies to update the 2013 APA guidelines. High-quality evidence supports SSRIs for first-line pharmacological treatment of OCD. Moreover, augmentation of SSRIs with antipsychotics (risperidone, aripiprazole) is the most evidence-based pharmacological intervention for SSRI-resistant OCD. CONCLUSION: SSRIs, in the highest recommended or tolerable doses for 8-12 weeks, remain the first-line treatment for adult OCD. Optimal augmentation strategies for SSRI-resistant OCD include low doses of risperidone or aripiprazole. Pharmacological treatments considered ineffective or potentially harmful, such as monotherapy with antipsychotics or augmentation with ketamine, lamotrigine, or N-acetylcysteine, have also been detailed.

Trends in sales of antidepressants in Brazil from 2014 to 2020: A time trend analysis with joinpoint regression.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the trends in antidepressants sales in Brazil. METHODS: We performed a joinpoint analysis of antidepressants sales in Brazil from 2014 to 2020, recorded in the Brazilian National Controlled Products Management System. The primary outcomes were the defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) and the market shares for each antidepressant per year. We used joinpoint regression to assess the changes in antidepressant consumption in DID to obtain the average annual percent change (AAPC) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). Changes in market shares were tested by chi-square trend test (p < 0.05 as significant). RESULTS: From 2014 to 2020, 42,252,989 antidepressant sales were recorded in the system. Antidepressant sales increased from 13.7 to 33.6 DID in the period (AAPC: 15.7; 95 % CI: 13.0-18.4; p < 0.001); the largest increases were observed for serotonin reuptake inhibitors and 'other' antidepressants (including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors), whereas tricyclics remained steady. Escitalopram and sertraline were the most sold drugs. Market share of serotonin reuptake inhibitors decreased, particularly for paroxetine (13.1 % to 6.5 %; p = 0.016), while 'other' antidepressants' market share expanded from 21.9 % to 33.3 % (p = 0.027), especially for desvenlafaxine (2.9 % to 14.3 %; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The dataset does not include antidepressants dispensed in hospitals, public services, and compounding pharmacies, neither their therapeutic indications. CONCLUSION: Sales of antidepressants significantly increased in Brazil from 2014 to 2020, which were mainly driven by higher prescriptions of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and 'other' antidepressants classes. Market share changes seem to be driven by novelty of products.

In Silico Analysis of the Antidepressant Fluoxetine and Related Drugs at SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro) and Papain-like Protease (PLpro).

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or 3CLpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro) are common viral targets for repurposed drugs to combat COVID-19 disease. Recently, several antidepressants (such as fluoxetine, venlafaxine and citalopram) belonging to the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and the Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRI) classes have been shown to in vitro inhibit viral replication. AIM: Investigate a possible action of fluoxetine and derivatives on SARS-CoV-2 protease sites. METHODS: Molecular docking was performed using AutoDock Vina. Both protease structures and different drug conformations were used to explore the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 inhibition on a Mpro or PLpro related pathway. Drug structures were obtained by optimization with the Avogadro software and MOPAC using the PM6 method. Results were analysed on Discovery Studio Visualizer. RESULTS: The results indicated that Mpro interacted in a thermodynamically favorable way with fluoxetine, venlafaxine, citalopram, atomoxetine, nisoxetine and norfluoxetine in the region of the active site, whether PLpro conformers did not come close to the active site. CONCLUSION: In an in silico perspective, it is likely that the SSRIs and other anti-depressants could interact with Mpro and cause the enzyme to malfunction. Unfortunately, the same drugs did not present similar results on PLpro crystal, therefore, no inhibition is expected in an in vitro trial. Anyway, in vitro tests are necessary for a better understanding of the links between SARS-CoV-2 proteases and antidepressants.

Randomized trial of the efficacy of trial-based cognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: preliminary findings.

INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is the fourth most prevalent mental disorder and is a disabling condition. OCD is associated with anatomical and functional changes in the brain, in addition to dysfunctional cognitions. The treatments of choice are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and exposure and response prevention (ERP). Trial-based cognitive therapy (TBCT) is a recent and empirically validated psychotherapy with a focus on restructuring dysfunctional negative core beliefs (CBs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TBCT relative to ERP for treatment of OCD. METHOD: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted, randomizing 26 patients for individual treatment with TBCT (n = 12) or ERP (n = 14). The groups were evaluated at baseline, at the end of 3 months (12 sessions), and at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Both approaches reduced the severity of symptoms with large effect sizes. These results were maintained at the 12-month follow-up assessment. CONCLUSION: TBCT may be a valid and promising treatment for this disorder.

Consensus of the Brazilian Headache Society (SBCe) for the Prophylactic Treatment of Episodic Migraine: part I.

The Brazilian Headache Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia, SBCe, in Portuguese) nominated a Committee of Authors with the aim of establishing a consensus with recommendations regarding prophylactic treatment for episodic migraine based on articles published in the worldwide literature, as well as personal experience. Migraine affects 1 billion people around the world and more than 30 million Brazilians. In addition, it is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disorder. It is well known within the medical community of neurologists, and especially among headache specialists, that there is a need to disseminate knowledge about prophylactic treatment for migraine. For this purpose, together with the need for drug updates and to expand knowledge of the disease itself (frequency, intensity, duration, impact and perhaps the progression of migraine), this Consensus was developed, following a full online methodology, by 12 groups who reviewed and wrote about the pharmacological categories of the drugs used and, at the end of the process, met to read and establish conclusions for this document. The drug classes studied were: anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, monoclonal anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) antibodies, beta-blockers, antihypertensives, calcium channel inhibitors, other antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, and dual-action antidepressants), other drugs, and polytherapy. Hormonal treatment and anti-inflammatories and triptans in minimum prophylaxis schemes (miniprophylaxis) will be covered in a specific chapter. The drug classes studied for part I of the Consensus were: anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, monoclonal anti-CGRP antibodies, and beta-blockers.

A Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia (SBCe) nomeou um Comitê de Autores com o objetivo de estabelecer um consenso com recomendações sobre o tratamento profilático da enxaqueca episódica com base em artigos da literatura mundial e da experiência pessoal. A enxaqueca é um distúrbio subdiagnosticado e subtratado que acomete um bilhão de pessoas no mundo e mais de 30 milhões de brasileiros. É conhecido na comunidade médica de neurologistas e, sobretudo, dos especialistas em cefaleia, a necessidade de se divulgar o conhecimento sobre o tratamento profilático da enxaqueca. Com esta finalidade, aliada às necessidades de atualizações de drogas e de se aumentar o conhecimento sobre a doença em si (frequência, intensidade, duração, impacto e talvez a progressão da enxaqueca), foi elaborado este Consenso, com metodologia totalmente on-line, por 12 grupos que revisaram e escreveram sobre as categorias farmacológicas das drogas e, ao final, reuniram-se para a leitura e conclusão do documento. As classes de drogas estudadas para este Consenso foram: anticonvulsivantes, antidepressivos tricíclicos, anticorpos monoclonais do antipeptídeo relacionado ao gene da calcitonina (peptídeo relacionado ao gene da calcitonina ­ anti-CGRP), betabloqueadores, anti-hipertensivos, inibidores dos canais de cálcio, outros antidepressivos (inibidores seletivos de recaptação de serotonina, ISRSs, e antidepressivos de ação dual), outras drogas, e politerapia. O tratamento hormonal, bem como anti-inflamatórios e triptanas em esquema de profilaxia mínima (miniprofilaxia), será abordado em um capítulo próprio. As classes de drogas estudadas na parte I do Consenso foram: anticonvulsivantes, antidepressivos tricíclicos, anticorpos monoclonais anti-CGRP, e betabloqueadores.

Interpersonal psychotherapy versus sertraline for women with posttraumatic stress disorder following recent sexual assault: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Sexual assault often triggers posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a potentially chronic severe mental disorder. Most guidelines recommend selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and trauma-focused psychotherapies as treatment options. Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), adapted for PTSD (IPT-PTSD), focuses on interpersonal consequences of trauma rather than confronting the trauma itself. Studies have found IPT-PTSD efficaciously reduced PTSD symptoms with limited attrition. No efficacy trials have compared IPT-PTSD and SSRI. We hypothesized IPT would reduce PTSD, anxiety, and depressive symptoms more than sertraline among women with PTSD following a recent sexual assault. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of IPT-PTSD to SSRI sertraline in a 14-week randomized clinical trial for women with PTSD following a recent sexual assault. Methods: Seventy-four women with PTSD who had suffered sexual assault in the last six months were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of IPT-PTSD (n = 39) or sertraline (n = 35). Instruments assessed PTSD, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. This randomized clinical trial was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale-5 (CAPS-5) as the primary outcome measure. Results: Both treatments significantly reduced PTSD, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, without between-group outcome differences. CAPS-5 mean decreased from 42.5 (SD = 9.4) to 27.1 (SD = 15.9) with sertraline and from 42.6 (SD = 9.1) to 29.1 (SD = 15.5) with IPT-PTSD. Attrition was high in both arms (p = .40). Conclusions: This trial showed within-group improvements without differences between IPT-PTSD and sertraline treatment of PTSD. Our findings suggest that non-exposure-based psychotherapies may benefit patients with PTSD, although we did not directly compare these treatments to an exposure therapy. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry RBR-3z474z.

Antecedentes: La agresión sexual con frecuencia gatilla un trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT), un trastorno mental severo potencialmente crónico. La mayoría de las guías clínicas recomiendan los inhibidores selectivos de la receptación de serotonina (ISRSs) y psicoterapias focalizadas en trauma como opciones de tratamiento. La Psicoterapia Interpersonal (PIP), adaptada para TEPT (PIP-TEPT), se focaliza en las consecuencias interpersonales del trauma en lugar de confrontar el trauma en sí. Los estudios han encontrado que la PIP-TEPT eficazmente redujo los síntomas de TEPT con una deserción limitada. Ningún ensayo de eficacia ha comparado PIP-TEPT e ISRS. Hipotetizamos que la PIP-TEPT puede reducir los síntomas de TEPT, ansiedad y depresión más que la sertralina entre las mujeres con TEPT después de una agresión sexual reciente.Objetivos: Comparar la eficacia de la PIP-TEPT con sertralina, un ISRS en un ensayo clínico aleatorizado de 14 semanas para mujeres con TEPT después de una agresión sexual reciente.Métodos: Setenta y cuatro mujeres con TEPT que habían sufrido de una agresión sexual en los últimos seis meses fueron asignadas aleatoriamente a 14 semanas de PIP-TEPT (n = 39) o sertralina (n = 35). Los instrumentos evaluaron síntomas de TEPT, ansiedad y depresión. Este ensayo clínico aleatorizado se realizó en San Pablo, Brasil, utilizando la Escala de TEPT administrada por el clínico (CAPS-5, por sus siglas en inglés) como medida de resultado primaria.Resultados: Ambos tratamientos redujeron significativamente los síntomas de TEPT, ansiedad y depresión, sin diferencias de resultados entre los grupos. La media del CAPS-5 se redujo de 42.5 (DE = 9.4) a 27.1 (DE = 15.9) con sertralina y de 42.6 (DE = 9.1) a 29.1 (DE = 15.5) con la PIP-TEPT. La deserción fue alta en ambos tratamientos (p = .40).Conclusiones: Este ensayo mostro mejoría entre grupos sin diferencias entre la PIP-TEPT y sertralina en el tratamiento del TEPT. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que las psicoterapias no basadas en la exposición pueden beneficiar a los pacientes con TEPT, aunque no comparamos directamente estos tratamientos con una terapia de exposición.Registro Brasileño de Ensayos Clínicos RBR-3z474z.

Tardive Oromandibular Dystonia Induced by Trazodone: A Clinical Case and Management from the Perspective of the Dental Specialist.

BACKGROUND: Tardive Oromandibular Dystonia is an iatrogenic drug-induced movement form of extrapyramidal symptoms associated primarily with chronic consumption of dopamine receptor blocking agents. Tardive symptoms attributable to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors antidepressants are far less prevalent. CLINICAL CASE: The authors will present a clinical case and management, from the dental specialist perspective, of a 55-year-old female patient who developed tardive oromandibular dystonia induced by Trazodone prescribed for sleep insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: Trazodone-induced oromandibular dystonia is extremely rare. Early identification and assessment of tardive symptoms are imperative for successful treatment. Trazodone should be prescribed with caution in patients taking other medications with the potential to cause tardive syndromes.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants reduce COVID-19 infection: prospects for use.

PURPOSE: The absence of specific treatments for COVID-19 leads to an intense global effort in the search for new therapeutic interventions and better clinical outcomes for patients. This review aimed to present a selection of accepted studies that reported the activity of antidepressant drugs belonging to the selective serotonin receptor inhibitor (SSRI) class for treating the novel coronavirus. METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed and SciELO databases using the following search strategies: [(coronavirus) OR (COVID) OR (SARS-CoV-2) AND (antidepressant) OR (serotonin) OR (selective serotonin receptor inhibitors)]. In the end, eleven articles were included. We also covered information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov in our research. RESULTS: Although several clinical trials are ongoing, only a few drugs have been officially approved to treat the infection. Remdesivir, an antiviral drug, despite favorable preliminary results, has restricted the use due to the risk of toxicity and methodological flaws. Antidepressant drugs were able to reduce the risk of intubation or death related to COVID-19, decrease the need for intensive medical care, and severely inhibit viral titers by up to 99%. Among the SSRIs studied so far, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine have shown to be the most promising against SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: If successful, these drugs can substantially reduce hospitalization and mortality rates, as well as allow for fully outpatient treatment for mild-to-moderate infections. Thus, repositioning SSRIs can provide benefits when faced with a rapidly evolving pandemic such as COVID-19.

Effects of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors on the ocular surface.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors on the ocular surface. METHODS: The study included 330 eyes of 165 patients using antidepressants and 202 eyes of 101 controls. Tear fluid breakup time, Schirmer I test, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire were administered. Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory were applied to record drug use, dosages, psychiatric disease duration, and remission time. RESULTS: Mean tear fluid breakup time was 14.29 ± 4.81 (4-26) sec, and Schirmer I test value was 16.05 ± 5.89 (2-28) mm in study group. Tear fluid breakup time was 18.16 ± 2.12 (15-24) sec and Schirmer I test value was 16.64 ± 2.31 (15-24) mm in control group (p<0.001 and p=0.005, respectively). In study group, 38.18% (n=63) of patients had dry eye, and 17% (n=18) of patients in control group had dry eye (p<0.001). The mean OSDI score was 82.56 ± 16.21 (66-100) in the tricyclic antidepressants Group, 60.02 ± 29.18 (10-100) in the serotonin reuptake inhibitors Group, and 22.30 ± 20.87 (0-75) in the serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors Group (p<0.001). Mean tear fluid breakup time was 14.36 ± 3.35 (10-20) sec in tricyclic antidepressants Group, 13.94 ± 5.81 (4-26) sec in the serotonin reuptake inhibitors Group, and 14.93 ± 4.20 (6-20) sec in serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors Group (p=0.730). The mean Schirmer I test value was 9.90 ± 7.22 (2-30) mm in tricyclic antidepressants Group, 15.55 ± 5.15 (2-25) mm in serotonin reuptake inhibitors Group and 17.71 ± 4.21 (10-30) mm in serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors Group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between OSDI score, tear fluid breakup time, and Schirmer I test values in serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-no-radrenaline reuptake inhibitors subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Dry eye is common in antidepressant users, but considering the ocular surface, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors may be more reliable than other antidepressants. Patients using serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors have lower OSDI scores. Serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, which are useful in chronic pain syndromes, may also have a corrective effect on dry eye symptoms.

Monitoramento do horizonte tecnológico: Medicamentos para o tratamento do transtorno depressivo maior / Monitoring the technological horizon: Drugs for the treatment of major depressive disorder

A DOENÇA: O transtorno depressivo maior (TDM) é considerado um grave problema de saúde pública que afeta mais de 264 milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo (1). No Brasil, a prevalência nacional da depressão estimada pelo Global Burden of Disease 2017 foi de 3,3% e esta condição está entre as quatro principais causas de invalidez, afetando a produtividade e qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Nas populações vulneráveis como os idosos, esse número é significativamente maior, uma revisão sistemática publicada em 2019 estimou uma prevalência de 21,9% em idosos brasileiros residentes na comunidade. Segundo projeções da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) para 2030, a depressão ocuparia o primeiro lugar entre as principais doenças incapacitantes. TRATAMENTO RECOMENDADO: Atualmente não existem Protocolos Clínicos e Diretrizes Terapêuticas (PCDT) do Ministério da Saúde, bem como avaliações da Conitec sobre esse tema. O tratamento da TDM depende da gravidade da doença, nos indivíduos com depressão grave, em que há risco de suicídio, o encaminhamento para o especialista deve ser imediato e a hospitalização pode ser um recurso necessário. Nos casos moderados, em geral, se sugere a combinação de psicoterapia e medicamentos antidepressivos, sendo que diversas classes são consideradas opções terapêuticas, como Inibidores seletivos da recaptação da serotonina; Inibidores seletivos da recaptação da noradrenalina; Antidepressivos atípicos; Moduladores da serotonina; Antidepressivos tricíclicos; Inibidores da monoaminoxidase. ESTRATÉGIA DE BUSCA: Uma busca no repositório de protocolos de estudos clínicos ClinicalTrials.gov foi realizada com o objetivo de localizar os medicamentos em fase de pesquisa clínica e/ou recentemente aprovados para TDM. Foram excluídos medicamentos com registro na Anvisa superior a dois anos para a indicação de depressão maior, assim como procedimentos, produtos da medicina tradicional chinesa, vitaminas e testes diagnósticos. MEDICAMENTOS APROVADOS RECENTEMENTE: ESCETAMINA SPRAY NASAL: A escetamina, o enantiômero "S" da cetamina racêmica, é um antagonista não seletivo, não competitivo do receptor N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA), que atua como um modulador do receptor de glutamato, o que parece aumentar a sinalização entre as células, restaurando a função normal nas regiões cerebrais. Embora a ligação da escetamina ao receptor NMDA aumente o glutamato do sistema nervoso central (SNC), o mecanismo de ação exato como antidepressivo permanece incerto. Esse medicamento possui registro nas agências norte-americana e europeia (FDA e EMA) e, em dezembro de 2020, foi aprovado pela Anvisa para tratamento do TDM em pacientes com ideação suicida e de depressão resistente ao tratamento. Depressão resistente ao tratamento: MEDICAMENTOS EM FASE DE PESQUISA CLÍNICA: RAPASTINEL: O rapastinel (GLYX-13) é um anticorpo monoclonal com apresentação para administração endovenosa, que atua como agonista parcial funcional do receptor de N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA) com ação no sistema glutamatérgico. INFORMAÇÕES ADICIONAIS: Atualmente existem diferentes tecnologias sendo estudadas para o tratamento de TDM, sendo que neste informe, foram descritas as tecnologias que estão em um horizonte mais próximo para aprovação por agências regulatórias ou foram aprovadas pela Anvisa recentemente. A escetamina spray nasal e brexpiprazol foram aprovados pela Anvisa em 2020, com o objetivo de avaliar a incorporação dessas tecnologias no mundo, uma busca foi realizada em novembro de 2021 nos websites das agências de ATS do Reino Unido, Canadá e Austrália. CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS O TDM: é um grave problema de saúde pública por afetar milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo. Apesar de haver muitos estudos em andamento para o tratamento dessa condição clínica, em geral os resultados dos estudos demonstraram que não há diferença significativa na eficácia dos medicamentos quando comparados ao placebo. O rapastinel, que recebeu designação Breakthough Therapy pela FDA em 2016, caracterizando-o como medicamento inovador para uma necessidade médica não atendida e que teria prioridade para avaliação na FDA, apresentou resultados promissores para estudo de fase 2, entretanto eles não foram confirmados nos ECR fase 3, duplo-cego, controlados por placebo, tanto em monoterapia como tratamento adjuvante para TDM. O medicamento REL-1017 (ou d-metadona), também é um inibidor do receptor NMDA e recebeu designação FastTrack pela FDA em 2017 para o tratamento adjuvante de TDM. Apesar dos dados do estudo de fase 2 mostrarem resultados promissores, o estudo de fase 3 ainda está em andamento. Também, esperam-se os dados das diversas pesquisas fase 3, realizadas em diferentes cenários (adjuvante ou monoterapia, por exemplo), e que avaliaram o medicamento SAGE-217, um modulador do receptor GABA que mostrou resultados positivos no estudo fase 2. O brexpiprazol foi aprovado pela Anvisa em 2020, indicado para o tratamento de depressão maior em adultos em associação a um antidepressivo, em caso de inefetividade da monoterapia com antidepressivo anterior. Os ensaios clínicos randomizados fase 3 avaliaram que o uso do medicamento reduziu o escore basal de MADRS na semana 6. O brexipiprazol para tratamento de depressão não foi avaliado por nenhuma agência de ATS até o momento. A escetamina spray nasal teve registro sanitário aprovado pela Anvisa em novembro de 2020 para pacientes com ideação suicida e de depressão resistente ao tratamento - a partir da avaliação da redução do escore basal de MADRS em 24h e após 28 dias. Mas esse medicamento não foi recomendado para incorporação pelas agências de ATS do Reino Unido e Canadá. Os medicamentos em desenvolvimento para depressão incluem populações específicas e frequentemente são usados em associação a outros antidepressivos. O tratamento da depressão grave e não responsiva a tratamentos prévios ainda é uma necessidade médica não atendida, assim como tratamentos específicos para populações vulneráveis como idosos. Também é importante destacar que todos os resultados descritos neste documento são dados precoces e devem ser avaliados com cautela. Dessa maneira, considerando os estudos de fase 3 citados neste documento, conclui-se que ainda são poucas as opções promissoras em estudo para um horizonte de curto a médio prazo.

A New Paradigm Shift in Antidepressant Therapy: From Dual-action to Multitarget-directed Ligands.

Major Depressive Disorder is a chronic, recurring, and potentially fatal disease, affecting up to 20% of the global population. Since the monoamine hypothesis was proposed more than 60 years ago, only a few relevant advances have been made, with very little disease course changing from a pharmacological perspective. Moreover, since the negative efficacy of novel molecules is frequently reported in studies, many pharmaceutical companies have put new studies on hold. Fortunately, relevant clinical studies are currently being performed extensively, developing immense interest among universities, research centers, and other public and private institutions. Depression is no longer considered a simple disease but a multifactorial one. New research fields are emerging, occurring a paradigm shift, such as the multi-target approach beyond monoamines. In this review, we summarize antidepressant drug discovery aiming to shed some light on the current state-of-the-art clinical and preclinical advances to face this increasingly devastating disease.

Drug-induced tremor, clinical features, diagnostic approach and management.

Tremor is the most common movement disorder and there are numerous causes of tremor. In many individuals, tremor can be due to drugs. The most common drugs associated with tremor include amiodarone, selective serotonin (and norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs), amitriptyline, lithium, valproate, ß-adrenoceptor agonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, VMAT2 inhibitors, or drugs of abuse: ethanol, cocaine, etc. Drug-induced tremor usually resembles essential or parkinsonian tremor, depending on the offending drug; however, features such as unilateral, task-specific, position-dependent tremor or sudden onset, distractibility, entrainment and arrest with contralateral movements suggest etiologies such as dystonic or functional (psychogenic) tremor. Risk factors for drug-induced tremor include polypharmacy, male gender, older age, high doses and immediate-release preparations or reaching toxic levels of the offending drugs. Drug-induced tremor usually resolves once the offending medication is discontinued, however, persistent tremor may be observed in some cases (tardive tremor). In this manuscript, we discuss the most common causes of drug-induced tremor. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Preventive treatment with fish oil facilitates the antidepressant-like effect of antidepressant drugs in type-1 diabetes mellitus rats: Implication of serotonergic system.

Treating depression associated with type-1 diabetesmellitus(T1DM) is a major clinical challenge. Fish oil (FO), composed mostly of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), has been pointed out as quite promising for the treatment of depression given its neuroprotective property. Although DHA and EPA exert several physiological actions, DHA is known to play a critical role in postnatal brain development. This study aimed to investigate the effect of preventive treatment with FO (with more DHA in the composition) alone or associated with antidepressant drugs on depression-like behaviors and brain monoamines levels of juvenile induced-T1DM rats. Thus, prepubescent rats were submitted to a prolonged treatment with vehicle (VEH) or FO (50% of DHA and 20% EPA) starting 4 weeks before the induction of experimental T1DM (on day 28) by streptozotocin. When combined, the treatment with vehicle, fluoxetine (FLX, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) or imipramine (IMI, a tricyclic antidepressant) started at week 6 (day 42) and lasted for 2 weeks (until day 56). The behavioral tests were conducted on days 55 and 56, followed by hippocampal and prefrontal cortex dissection for neurochemical analyses. Our results showed that induced-T1DM rats pretreated with FO showed a significant increase of EPA and DHA in plasma, indicative of an increase in the systemic availability of these acids. As previously observed, induced-T1DM rats presented increased immobility and decreased swimming and climbing frequencies in the modified forced swimming test, indicative of depressive-like behavior. Only the combined treatment - FO plus antidepressants (FLX or IMI - both in the highest dose) - was able to induce a significant improvement of depressive-like behaviors. Here, it is noteworthy that swimming behavior has been associated with an increase in serotonergic neurotransmission. Interestingly, our data showed that the combined treatment (FO + antidepressants - including the ineffective dose of FLX) was able to increase the swimming of animals more significantly compared to animals not pretreated with FO. In addition, confirming these assumptions, the decreased 5-HT levels in the hippocampus from induced-T1DM rats were increased after treatment with FLX (highest dose) or IMI (both doses), being this increase more pronounced in animal pretreated with FO. Intriguingly, in these animals pretreated with FO, the ineffective dose of FLX in association with FO was able to increase the levels of 5-HT. The decreased hippocampal levels of noradrenaline were increased only after IMI treatment, not being influenced by FO pretreatment. In conclusion, ours results pointed out that the choice of the DHA/EPA ratio may be an important factor to be considered for the FO antidepressant-like effectper se,but the FO treatment in this composition associated with the antidepressant drugs - especially that ones that increase preferentially the availability of 5-HT -, may represent a better alternative of treatment to individuals with T1DM-associated depression.