Role of scalp nerve block in improving the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we analyzed whether scalp nerve block with ropivacaine can improve the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection. METHODS: We included 150 patients who were undergoing craniotomy in our hospital and categorized them into 2 groups - observation group (patients received an additional regional scalp nerve block anesthesia) and control group (patients underwent intravenous general anesthesia for surgery), using the random number table method approach (75 patients in each group). The main indicator of the study was the Karnofsky Performance Scale scores of patients at 3 days postoperatively, and the secondary indicator was the anesthesia satisfaction scores of patients after awakening from anesthesia. The application value of different anesthesia modes was studied and compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients in the observation group showed better anesthesia effects than those in the control group, with significantly higher Karnofsky Performance Scale scores at 3 days postoperatively (75.02 vs 66.43, P < .05) and anesthesia satisfaction scores. Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the observation group had lower pain degrees at different times after the surgery, markedly lower dose of propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia, and lower incidence of adverse reactions and postoperative complications. In addition, the satisfaction score of the patients and their families for the treatment was higher and the results of all the indicators were better in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Scalp nerve block with ropivacaine significantly improves the quality of short-term postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for meningioma resection. This is presumably related to the improvements in intraoperative hemodynamics, relief from postoperative pain, and reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Prognostic Factors for Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival After Recurrence of Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with glioblastoma experience an intracerebral recurrence and require a personalized treatment. This study aimed to facilitate this approach by identifying prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 102 patients with recurrent glioblastoma following primary treatment with resection or biopsy plus adjuvant chemoradiation, 11 characteristics were retrospectively investigated regarding PFS and OS. RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) 90-100 at the time of recurrence (p=0.032), maximum cumulative diameter of recurrent lesions ≤40 mm (p=0.002), resection of recurrent glioblastoma (p=0.025), and systemic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma (p=0.025) were significantly associated with improved PFS. In addition, KPS 90-100 (p=0.024), maximum cumulative diameter ≤40 mm (p=0.033), and systemic therapy (p=0.006) were significantly associated with better OS. CONCLUSION: Our study identified high Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS 90-100), maximum cumulative diameter of recurrent glioblastoma lesions ≤40 mm, and systemic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma as independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). These independent prognostic factors may help select the most suitable treatment for individual patients with recurrent glioblastoma, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Palliative radiotherapy: New prognostic factors for patients with bone metastasis.

PURPOSE: Many cancer patients develop bone metastases, however the prognosis of overall survival differs. To provide an optimal treatment for these patients, especially towards the end of life, a reliable prediction of survival is needed. The goal of this study was to find new clinical factors in relation to overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively 22 clinical factors were collected from 734 patients. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS: Most patients were diagnosed with lung cancer (29%), followed by prostate (19.8%) and breast cancer (14.7%). Median overall survival was 6.4months. Fourteen clinical factors showed significance in the univariate analyses. In the multivariate analyses 6 factors were found to be significant for the overall survival: Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor, gender, total organs affected, morphine use and systemic treatment options after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Morphine use and systemic treatment options after radiotherapy, Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor, gender and total organs affected are strong prediction factors on overall survival after palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastasis. These factors are easily applicable in the clinic.

Anamnestic radiological metastases outcome surgical score (ARMO-S). A purpose of a predictive surgical scoring system for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Several risk stratification scores have been suggested to aid prognostication and guide treatment strategies for brain metastases (BMs). However, the current scores do not focus on the specific neurosurgical population, therefore not predicting short-term mortality and postoperative performance status. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of 362 consecutive patients treated with surgery for BMs aims to identify the factors associated with post-surgical outcomes and propose a surgery-specific prognostic score for patients with BMs candidate for open surgery. RESULTS: Factors significantly associated with OS and performance status in multivariate analysis were age, KPS, surgical site, synchronous debut of BM, number, tumor volume, seizure, extra-cranial metastases, and deep-seated location. The variables were incorporated into the Anamnestic Radiological Metastases Outcome Surgical score (ARMO-S). The values range between 0 and 10. Patients were divided into two groups (low-risk and high-risk) based on each significant subgroup's median survival and performance status with an optimal cutoff value determined as 4. The two groups have significant differences in OS (9.6 versus 14 months, p = 0.0048) postoperative KPS (90 versus 70, p = 0.012) and KPS at last follow-up evaluation (75 versus 30, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: ARMO-S is a simple and comprehensive score for BM patients selected for neurosurgery, as it incorporates the main factors of the most important prognostic scores, implementing them with more surgery-specific predictive elements such as tumor location and volume, presence of seizures at onset, and involvement of eloquent brain areas.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of adult brainstem gliomas: A retrospective analysis of histologically-proven 40 cases.

To illustrate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of adult patients pathologically confirmed with brainstem gliomas (BSGs). Clinical data of 40 adult patients pathologically diagnosed with BSGs admitted to Beijing Shijitan Hospital from 2009 to 2022 were recorded and retrospectively analyzed. The primary parameters included relevant symptoms, duration of symptoms, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), tumor location, type of surgical resection, diagnosis, treatment, and survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were evaluated by Cox regression models. The gliomas were located in the midbrain of 9 patients, in the pons of 14 cases, in the medulla of 5 cases, in the midbrain and pons of 6 cases and invading the medulla and pons of 6 cases, respectively. The proportion of patients with low-grade BSGs was 42.5%. Relevant symptoms consisted of visual disturbance, facial paralysis, dizziness, extremity weakness, ataxia, paresthesia, headache, bucking, dysphagia, dysacousia, nausea, dysphasia, dysosmia, hypomnesia and nystagmus. 23 (57.5%) patients accepted stereotactic biopsy, 17 (42.5%) patients underwent surgical resection. 39 patients received radiotherapy and 34 cases were treated with temozolomide. The median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 26.2 months and 21.5 months for the median progression-free survival (PFS). Both duration of symptoms (P = .007) and tumor grading (P = .002) were the influencing factors for OS, and tumor grading was significantly associated with PFS (P = .001). Duration of symptoms for more than 2 months and low-grade are favorable prognostic factors for adult patients with BSGs.

Treatment of malignant airway obstruction with Y-shape sigma stent loaded with I125 seeds installed via rigid bronchoscopy.

PURPOSE: To summarize and analyze the safety and efficacy of a Y-shape Sigma stent loaded with I125 in patients with inoperable malignant main airway obstruction. METHODS: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and a written informed consent was obtained from each participant. A Y-shape Sigma stent loaded with I125 was placed under vision from rigid bronchoscopy. The primary endpoint was alleviation of symptoms and improvement of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, and the secondary endpoint was complications and technical success. RESULTS: From November 2018 through June 2023, total 33 patients with malignant airway obstruction were palliatively treated by installing Y-shape Sigma stents loaded with I125. The airway lumen was immediately restored and the average airway opening significantly increased to 70 ± 9.4% after the procedure from baseline 30.2 ± 10.5% (p < 0.05). Average KPS score was improved from baseline 30.0 ± 10.0 to 70.0 ± 10.0 (p < 0.05) as well as PaO2 from baseline 50.1 ± 15.4 mmHg to 89.3 ± 8.6 mmHg (p < 0.05). The technical success rate of placing the stent in this study was 73%, and adverse events or complications including bleeding, I125 loss, and airway infection occurred during or after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Placement of Y-shape Sigma stents under vision from rigid bronchoscopy in the patients with malignant airway obstruction is feasible and it immediately alleviates dyspnea and significantly improves quality of life.

'How long do you think?' Unresponsive dying patients in a specialist palliative care service: A consecutive cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Predicting length of time to death once the person is unresponsive and deemed to be dying remains uncertain. Knowing approximately how many hours or days dying loved ones have left is crucial for families and clinicians to guide decision-making and plan end-of-life care. AIM: To determine the length of time between becoming unresponsive and death, and whether age, gender, diagnosis or location-of-care predicted length of time to death. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Time from allocation of an Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) 10 to death was analysed using descriptive narrative. Interval-censored survival analysis was used to determine the duration of patient's final phase of life, taking into account variation across age, gender, diagnosis and location of death. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 786 patients, 18 years of age or over, who received specialist palliative care: as hospice in-patients, in the community and in aged care homes, between January 1st and October 31st, 2022. RESULTS: The time to death after a change to AKPS 10 is 2 days (n = 382; mean = 2.1; median = 1). Having adjusted for age, cancer, gender, the standard deviation of AKPS for the 7-day period prior to death, the likelihood of death within 2 days is 47%, with 84% of patients dying within 4 days. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable new knowledge to support clinicians' confidence when responding to the 'how long' question and can inform decision-making at end-of-life. Further research using the AKPS could provide greater certainty for answering 'how long' questions across the illness trajectory.

The impact of Karnofsky performance status on prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Functional performance as measured by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale has been linked to the outcomes of liver transplant patients; however, the effect of KPS on the outcomes of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) liver transplant population has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the association between pre-transplant KPS score and long-term outcomes in HCC patients listed for liver transplantation. METHODS: Adult HCC candidates listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2017 were grouped into group I (KPS 80-100%, n = 8,379), group II (KPS 50-70%, n = 8,091), and group III (KPS 10-40%, n = 1,256) based on percentage KPS score at listing. Survival was compared and multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Patients with low KPS score had a higher risk of removal from the waiting list. The 5-year intent-to-treat survival was 57.7% in group I, 53.2% in group II and 46.7% in group III (P < 0.001). The corresponding overall survival was 77.6%, 73.7% and 66.3% in three groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that KPS was an independent predictor of intent-to-treat survival (P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.19 [95%CI 1.07-1.31] for group II, P = 0.001; HR 1.63 [95%CI 1.34-1.99] for group III, P < 0.001) and overall survival(P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.16 [95%CI 1.05-1.28] for group II, P = 0.004; HR 1.53 [95%CI 1.26-1.87] for group III, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year recurrence rates was higher in group III patients (7.4%), compared with 5.2% in group I and 5.5% in group II (P = 0.037). However, this was not significant in the competing regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Low pre-transplant KPS score is associated with inferior long-term survival in liver transplant HCC patients, but is not significantly associated with post-transplant tumor recurrence.

Association of Functional Status and Symptom Severity Among Patients Who Received Palliative Care Consultations.

Background: The relationship between functional status and the severity of different symptoms in patients with serious illnesses has not been explored in detail. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated registry data of hospitalized patients who received inpatient palliative care consults at the Mount Sinai Health System between January 01, 2020, and December 31, 2022. The registry was approved by the local institutional review board. During the initial consult, palliative care clinicians administered the Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). We extracted these measures and other variables of interest from electronic health records and billing data, and assessed the association of functional status and symptom severity for different symptoms using ordinal logistic regression models. Results: The study included 9800 patients who received a palliative care consult. When modeling the association of functional status and the severity of different symptoms, two distinct groups of symptoms emerged: Nausea, physical discomfort, anxiety, depression, and constipation were more prevalent and severe among patients with higher functional status. Conversely, drowsiness, inactivity, dyspnea, anorexia, and agitation were more prevalent and severe among patients with lower functional status. These findings remained statistically significant after adjusting for possible confounders. Conclusion: Among patients who received inpatient palliative care consults, lower functional status was associated with a higher symptom burden. Furthermore, symptom profiles differed between patients with reduced functional status and those with preserved functional status.

Using Performance Status to Identify Risk of Acute Care Transfer in Inpatient Cancer Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient factors associated with acute care transfer (ACT) among cancer survivors admitted for inpatient medical rehabilitation. DESIGN: An exploratory, observational design was used to analyze retrospective data from electronic medical records. SETTING: Data were obtained from 3 separate inpatient rehabilitation hospitals within a private rehabilitation hospital system in the Northeast. PARTICIPANTS: Medical records were reviewed and analyzed for a total of 416 patients with a confirmed oncologic diagnosis treated in 1 of the inpatient rehabilitation hospitals between January and December 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of an ACT. Covariates included the adapted Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) for inpatient rehabilitation, demographic information, admission date, re-admission status, discharge destination, and cancer-related variables, such as primary cancer diagnosis and presence/location of metastases. RESULTS: One in 5 patients (21.2%) were transferred to acute care. Patients with hematologic cancer had a higher risk of ACT compared with those with central nervous system (CNS) cancer. Lower functional status, measured by the adapted KPS, was associated with a higher likelihood of ACT. Patients with an admission KPS score indicating the need for maximum assistance had the highest transfer rate (59.1%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the medical complexity of this population and increased risk of an interrupted rehabilitation stay. Considering patients' performance status, cancer type, and extent of disease may be important when assessing the appropriateness of IRF admission relative to patient quality of life. Earlier and improved understanding of the patient's prognosis will allow the cancer rehabilitation program to meet the patient's unique needs and facilitate an appropriate discharge to the community in an optimal window of time.

Clinical Characteristics Associated With Posttransplant Survival Among Adults 70 Years Old or Older Undergoing Liver Transplantation.

GOALS: We sought to identify pre-liver transplantation (LT) characteristics among older adults associated with post-LT survival. BACKGROUND: The proportion of older patients undergoing deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has increased over time. STUDY: We analyzed adult DDLT recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry from 2016 through 2020, excluding patients listed as status 1 or with a model of end-stage liver disease exceptions for hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate post-LT survival probabilities among older recipients (age ≥70 y). Associations between clinical covariates and post-LT mortality were assessed using Cox regressions. RESULTS: Of 22,862 DDLT recipients, 897 (4%) were 70 years old or older. Compared with younger recipients, older recipients had worse overall survival ( P < 0.01) (1 y: 88% vs 92%, 3 y: 77% vs 86%, and 5 y: 67% vs 78%). Among older adults, in univariate Cox regressions, dialysis [hazards ratio (HR): 1.96, 95% CI: 1.38-2.77] and poor functional status [defined as Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) <40] (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.31-2.53) were each associated with mortality, remaining significant on multivariable Cox regressions. The effect of dialysis and KPS <40 at LT on post-LT survival (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.77-4.01) was worse than the effects of either KPS <40 (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.03-2.23) or dialysis alone (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.62-3.36). Older recipients with KPS >40 without dialysis had comparable survival rates compared with younger recipients ( P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: While older DDLT recipients had worse overall post-LT survival compared with younger recipients, favorable survival rates were observed among older adults who did not require dialysis and had poor functional status. Poor functional status and dialysis at LT may be useful to stratify older adults at higher risk for poor post-LT outcomes.

The Evolution of Anterior Transpetrosal Approach for the Treatment of Petroclival Meningiomas: A Single-Center 128-Case Experience.

BACKGROUND: The profound understanding of anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) is increasingly used to treat petroclival meningiomas (PCMs). We introduce the evolution of ATPA and the outcomes of PCMs treatment. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2019, 128 patients with PCMs underwent surgery. According to tumor extension, we classified the 128 patients into 5 types (I-V), introduced key technologies of ATPA into different types for the first time, and achieved a supreme surgical technology. Clinical data, radiological findings, surgical treatments, complications, and patient outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 22 (17.2%), 44 (34.4%), 25 (19.5%), 29 (22.7%), and 8 (6.3%) patients had type I, II, III, IV, and V disease, respectively. Tumors were gross totally removed (Simpson I and II) in 100 patients (78.1%), subtotally removed (Simpson III) in 20 patients (15.6%), and partially removed (Simpson IV) in 8 patients (6.3%). The progression or recurrence rates were 5% (5/100) for gross totally removed, 22.3% (6/20) for subtotally removed, and 62.5% (5/8; 1 died) for partially removed. According to the Karnofsky Performance Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale, 108 patients had good recovery (84.4%, 108/128) and 115 were independent (89.8%, 115/128) at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Because some key technologies were used in ATPA, the application of ATPA was extended, and greater tumor resection and nerve function protection could be achieved in the treatment of PCMs.

[Home parenteral nutrition in patients with malignant bowel obstruction. Ethical considerations]. / Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en pacientes con obstrucción intestinal maligna. Consideraciones éticas.

Introduction: Background: patients with cancer are one of the main group of patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) represent a challenging group when considering HPN. At the Ethics Working Group of SENPE ethical considerations on this subject were reviewed and a guidelines proposal was made. Methods: a literature search was done and a full set of questions arose: When, if ever, is HPN indicated for patients with MBO? How should the training program be? When withdrawal of HPN should be considered? Other questions should be also taken into consideration. May any Oncologist send home a patient with HPN? The educational program could be shortened? When considering to withdraw parenteral nutrition? Results: HPN in MBO has better outcomes when patients have a good functional status (Karnofsky ≥ 50 or ECOG ≤ 2), expected survival > 2-3 months, and low inflammatory markers. Very few data have been reported on quality of life, but HPN allows a valuable time at home albeit with a considerable burden for both patients and their families. Proposal: once a patient is considered for HPN, there is a need for a deep talk on the benefits, complications and risks. In this initial talk, when HNP should be stopped needs to be included. The palliative care team with the help of the nutrition support team should follow the patient, whose clinical status must be assessed regularly. HPN should be withdrawn when no additional benefits are achieved. Conclusion: HPN may be considered an option in patients with MBO when they have a fair or good functional status and a desire to spend their last days at home.

Introducción: Introducción: los pacientes con cáncer constituyen uno de los principales grupos de pacientes dentro de los programas de nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD). Existe un grupo de pacientes con obstrucción intestinal maligna (OIM) en quienes el uso de la NPD es controvertido. Desde el Grupo de Ética de la SENPE se revisan las cuestiones éticas detrás de la decisión de iniciar la NPD en un paciente con OIM y se propone una propuesta de acción. Método: se procedió a hacer una revisión crítica de la literatura, tras la cual se diseñaron las preguntas que este documento pretendía responder: ¿Está indicado el uso de la NPD en pacientes con OIM? ¿En qué situaciones? Quedarían otros aspectos que también merecen una reflexión: ¿Cualquier oncólogo puede enviar a un paciente a su domicilio con NPD? ¿Debe ser el programa de formación de los cuidados en la NPD igual que el referente a los pacientes con fracaso intestinal de causa benigna? ¿Se debe suspender la NPD en algún momento? Resultados: la NPD en pacientes con OIM consigue mejores resultados en aquellos con una buena situación funcional (índice de Karnofsky ≥ 50 o ECOG ≤ 2), con un pronóstico vital superior a 2-3 meses e, idealmente, con niveles de marcadores inflamatorios bajos. En los escasos trabajos publicados en los que se valoran las ventajas sobre la calidad de vida, se concluye que la NPD permite a los pacientes disponer de un tiempo valioso en su domicilio pero a costa de una carga significativa para ellos mismos y sus familias. Propuesta de acción: una vez considerado como candidato a la NPD, se debe tener una conversación abierta con el paciente y sus familiares en la que se aborden los beneficios potenciales, las implicaciones prácticas y los riesgos. En esa conversación inicial debe también plantearse en qué momento considerar la retirada de la NPD. El responsable de la NPD es el equipo de soporte domiciliario en colaboración con el de nutrición clínica. La situación clínica debe evaluarse de forma periódica de manera que, cuando la NPD no proporcione ningún beneficio adicional, se plantee su retirada, manteniendo el resto de medidas de tratamiento sintomático paliativo. Conclusión: la NPD puede constituir una opción de tratamiento paliativo en pacientes con OIM con buena capacidad funcional y un deseo manifiesto de disponer de más tiempo en su domicilio en los últimos estadios de su enfermedad.

Distress Scores in Elderly Cancer Patients During Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: When assigned to radiotherapy (RT), elderly patients may experience distress. We investigated distress during RT and potential risk factors in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six-hundred-and-nineteen patients completed pre-RT and post-RT distress thermometers. Seven characteristics were investigated including age, sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), grouped KPS, tumor type, intent of RT, and previous RT. Additional analyses were performed in 358 patients with pre-RT scores ≤5. RESULTS: Mean change of distress was -0.5 (±2.7) points and associated with KPS (p=0.005) and grouped KPS (p<0.001). Male sex (p=0.035), KPS 90-100 (p=0.001), and curative intent (p=0.037) were associated with increased distress on univariable analyses, and KPS 90-100 (odds ratio=1.92, p=0.004) on multivariable analysis. In patients with baseline scores ≤5, mean change was +0.5 (±2.5) points and associated with KPS (p=0.040) and grouped KPS (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: Psychological assistance should be considered for all patients including those with baseline scores ≤5 and KPS 90-100. Patients with risk factors for increased distress would especially benefit.

Concomitant radiosurgical and targeted oncological treatment improves the outcome of patients with brain metastases from gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: So far, only limited studies exist that evaluate patients with brain metastases (BM) from GI cancer and associated primary cancers who were treated by Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) and concomitant immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT). METHODS: Survival after GKRS was compared to the general and specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) and Score Index for Radiosurgery (SIR). Further, the influence of age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS), extracranial metastases (ECM) status at BM diagnosis, number of BM, the Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) classes, GKRS1 treatment mode and concomitant treatment with IT or TT on the survival after GKRS was analyzed. Moreover, complication rates after concomitant GKRS and mainly TT treatment are reported. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed IT or TT at or after the first Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS1) treatment as the only significant predictor for overall survival after GKRS1, even after adjusting for sex, KPS group, age group, number of BM at GKRS1, RPA class, ECM status at BM diagnosis and GKRS treatment mode. Concomitant treatment with IT or TT did not increase the rate of adverse radiation effects. There was no significant difference in local BM progression after GKRS between patients who received IT or TT and patients without IT or TT. CONCLUSION: Good local tumor control rates and low rates of side effects demonstrate the safety and efficacy of GKRS in patients with BM from GI cancers. The concomitant radiosurgical and targeted oncological treatment significantly improves the survival after GKRS without increasing the rate of adverse radiation effects. To provide local tumor control, radiosurgery remains of utmost importance in modern GI BM management.

Reevaluating age restrictions of spinal metastasis surgery in elderly groups with over 2-year follow-up.

This study aimed to compare and assess clinical outcomes of spinal metastasis with epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) in patients aged 65-79 years and ≥ 80 years with an acute onset of neurological illness who underwent laminectomy. A second goal was to determine morbidity rates and potential risk factors for mortality. This retrospective review of electronic medical records at a single institution was conducted between September 2005 and December 2020. Data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, hospital clinical course, and 90-day mortality were also collected. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). A total of 99 patients with an overall mean age of 76.2 ± 3.4 years diagnosed with MESCC within a 16-year period, of which 65 patients aged 65-79 years and 34 patients aged 80 years and older were enrolled in the study. Patients aged 80 and over had higher age-adjusted CCI (9.2 ± 2.1) compared to those aged 65-79 (5.1 ± 1.6; p < 0.001). Prostate cancer was the primary cause of spinal metastasis. Significant neurological and functional decline was more pronounced in the older group, evidenced by Karnofsky Performance Index (KPI) scores (80+ years: 47.8% ± 19.5; 65-79 years: 69.0% ± 23.9; p < 0.001). Despite requiring shorter decompression duration (148.8 ± 62.5 min vs. 199.4 ± 78.9 min; p = 0.004), the older group had more spinal levels needing decompression. Median survival time was 14.1 ± 4.3 months. Mortality risk factors included deteriorating functional status and comorbidities, but not motor weakness, surgical duration, extension of surgery, hospital or ICU stay, or complications. Overcoming age barriers in elderly surgical treatment in MSCC patients can reduce procedural delays and has the potential to significantly improve patient functionality. It emphasizes that age should not be a deterrent for spine surgery when medically necessary, although older MESCC patients may have reduced survival.

Development of Distress During a Radiotherapy Course in Patients Irradiated for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) may experience considerable distress. We investigated the course of distress during an RT-course for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-hundred-and-thirty breast cancer patients completed Distress Thermometers before and directly after RT. Distress was evaluated in the entire cohort and different groups of age, sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), intent of RT, and previous RT. RESULTS: Mean change of distress scores was - 0.4 points, which was significantly associated with KPS. Decrease of distress was more pronounced in patients with KPS ≤80 or age <64 years. Deterioration (yes vs. no) was non-significantly associated with no previous RT. In patients with pre-RT distress scores ≤5 points, mean score increased by +0.5 points; no significant associations between characteristics and investigated endpoints were found. CONCLUSION: Psychological assistance should be offered to all patients irradiated for breast cancer, particularly to those with risk factors, regardless of the pre-RT distress score.

Development and adaptations of the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) scale: a systematic review.

The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score has the best accuracy among prognostic scales for patients with brain metastases (BM). A wide range of GPA-derived scales have been established to different types of primary tumor BM. However, there is a high variability between them, and their characteristics have not been described altogether yet. We aim to summarize the features of the existent GPA-derived scales and to compare their predictor factors and their uses in clinical setting. Medline was searched from inception until January 2023 to identify studies related to the development, update, or validation of GPA. The initial search yielded 1,083 results. 16 original studies and 16 validation studies were included, comprising a total of 33,348 patients. 13 different scales were assessed, including: GPA, Diagnosis-Specific GPA, Extracranial Score, Lung-molGPA, Updated Renal GPA, Updated Gastrointestinal GPA, Modified Breast GPA, Integrated Melanoma GPA, Melanoma Mol GPA, Sarcoma GPA, Hepatocellular Carcinoma GPA, Colorectal Cancer GPA, and Uterine Cancer GPA. The most prevalent prognostic predictors were age, Karnofsky Performance Status, number of BM, and presence or absence of extracranial metastases. Treatment modalities consisted of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, cranial radiotherapy, gamma knife radiosurgery, and BRAF inhibitor therapy. Median survival rates with no treatment and with a specific treatment ranged from 6.1 weeks to 33 months and from 3.1 to 21 months, respectively. Original GPA and GPA-derived scales are valid prognostic tools, but with heterogeneous survival results when compared to each other. More studies are needed to improve scientific evidence of these scales.

Posterior-only approach in patients with poor general condition and spinal metastatic vertebral fracture / Corpectomía con abordaje solo posterior en pacientes con mal estado general y fractura vertebral metastásica espinal

Purpose The surgical treatment of spinal metastases is mostly palliative in nature and focuses on improving the quality of life of patients. The posterior transpedicular surgical approach provides circumferential 360° decompression, allows reconstruction and stabilisation to be achieved in a single session and can be performed using an open, mini-open or minimally invasive approach. We present and discuss the surgical techniques and outcomes for patients with single-level metastatic spinal disease and in poor general condition who underwent surgery via the posterior-only transpedicular corpectomy approach and reconstruction with expandable corpectomy cages. Methods Patients with a single level thoracolumbar metastatic disease (T3-L5) and a Karnofsky score of ≤70, who underwent a complete posterior transpedicular corpectomy with expandable cage reconstruction of the anterior spinal column were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ demographics, SINS, modified Tokuhashi scores as well as preoperative and postoperative ASIA scale, Karnofsky scores, VAS scores and vertebral height/Cobb angle values were analysed. Results A total of 44 patients (24 M/20 F) (mean age 53.25±21.26 years) met the inclusion criteria. The modified Tokuhashi scores were as follows: score 0–8, 5 (11.4%) patients; score 9–11, 14 (31.8%) patients; and score 12–15, 25 (56.8%) patients. There were significant improvements in the postoperative VAS scores (mean 7.7–2.9), Karnofsky scores (mean 63.3–79.6) as well as the Cobb angles (18.6–12.8°) and vertebral height (AU)

Propósito El tratamiento quirúrgico de las metástasis espinales es principalmente de naturaleza paliativa y se enfoca en mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes. El abordaje quirúrgico transpedicular posterior proporciona una descompresión circunferencial de 360°, permite lograr la reconstrucción y estabilización en una sola sesión y se puede realizar mediante un abordaje abierto, miniabierto o mínimamente invasivo. Presentamos y discutimos las técnicas quirúrgicas y los resultados para pacientes con enfermedad espinal metastásica de un solo nivel, y en mal estado general, que se sometieron a cirugía mediante el abordaje de corpectomía transpedicular solo posterior y reconstrucción con jaulas de corpectomía expandibles. Métodos Se revisaron retrospectivamente pacientes con una enfermedad metastásica toracolumbar de un solo nivel (T3-L5) y una puntuación de Karnofsky≤70, que se sometieron a una corpectomía transpedicular posterior completa con reconstrucción de la columna anterior con jaula expandible. Se analizaron los datos demográficos de los pacientes, SINS, las puntuaciones de Tokuhashi modificadas, así como la escala ASIA preoperatoria y posoperatoria, las puntuaciones de Karnofsky, las puntuaciones VAS y los valores de altura vertebral/ángulo de Cobb. Resultados Un total de 44 pacientes (24 M/20 F) (edad media 53,25±21,26 años) cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Las puntuaciones de Tokuhashi modificadas fueron las siguientes: puntuación de 0 a 8, 5 (11,4%) pacientes; puntuación 9-11, 14 (31,8%) pacientes; y puntuación 12-15, 25 (56,8%) pacientes. Hubo mejoras significativas en las puntuaciones VAS postoperatorias (media de 7,7 a 2,9), las puntuaciones de Karnofsky (media de 63,3 a 79,6), así como los ángulos de Cobb (18,6° a 12,8°) y la altura vertebral. Treinta y cinco pacientes mostraron una función neurológica mejorada en al menos un grado ASIA, mientras que 9 no mostraron mejoría durante el período postoperatorio (AU)