Immunohistochemistry staining of Eag1 and p16/Ki-67 can help improve the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia after cold knife conversion.

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely used in the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) but still has many limitations in clinical practice. We analyzed the correlation of new biomarkers with the severity of CIN and follow-up outcomes in patients after conization to improve the management of patients with CIN. METHODS: IHC staining of Eag1 and p16/Ki-67 was performed on cervical tissue sections from 234 patients with suspected CIN2/3. After a series of follow-ups, including human papillomavirus (HPV) test and thinprep cytologic test (TCT) for 1-2 years, the outcomes were collected. IHC scores of biomarkers and follow-up results were used to analyze the correlation and assess the diagnostic efficiency of biomarkers. RESULTS: The IHC staining intensity of Eag1 and p16/Ki-67 was significantly different from that of the CIN1-3 groups (p < 0.05). Eag1 expression scores were significantly different in the distribution between the two follow-up groups (p < 0.001). ROC curves based on the correlations between the follow-up outcomes and the Eag1 scores and IS of p16/ki-67 showed that Eag1 had a greater AUC (0.767 vs. 0.666). Logistic regression analysis of the combination of biomarkers revealed a greater AUC value than any single biomarker. CONCLUSIONS: Eag1 expression was significantly correlated with CIN grade and follow-up outcomes after conization. IHC staining of combinations of biomarkers of Eag1, p16 and Ki-67 may help us to improve the ability to identify risk groups with abnormal follow-up outcomes after treatment for CIN.

Validation of immunohistochemical overexpression of p16 in the histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.

An accurate cytohistologic diagnosis is important to avoid overtreatment of cervical intraepithelial lesions. The three-tiered Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) classification, grades 1, 2 and 3, despite poor agreement among pathologists in diagnosing CIN2, is still being used. The College of American Pathologists recommended an alternative two-tiered classification that has not yet been universally accepted. We review the diagnostic results of 286 biopsies performed by three pathologists using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and p16 to establish the level of agreement among the readers. Agreement between pathologists in diagnosing CIN2 with H&E was around 45% and improved to 86.7% when interpreting p16 stained biopsies without H&E; agreement with pathologist 3 was lower, around 60%. Discrepant results from one pathologist when assessing p16 highlights the decisive influence of individual criteria. P16 has shown to improve agreement between pathologists with previous good agreement, but did not correct it for the third pathologist. In equivocal cases, protein p16 is a useful conjunctive tool for a histologic diagnosis.

Association between p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology results prior to and 6 months after LLETZ treatment for CIN and the follow-up regimen three years after treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the association between p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology test (DST) results, obtained prior to- and 6 months after LLETZ surgery for treatment of CIN, and the follow-up regimen three years after treatment. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Cervical cytology samples were obtained just prior to- and 6 months after LLETZ and underwent conventional liquid-based cytology (LBC) and p16/Ki-67 dual staining, as well as high-risk HPV genotyping. Clinical management after the LLETZ was according to Belgian national guidelines, with clinicians being blinded to DST results at both time points. Case records were reviewed in 01/2023 to document the follow-up regimen on average three years afterwards: women had either been advised to return to routine screening (i.e., three-annual LBC testing according to the Belgian guideline at that time), or were still subject to more frequent posttreatment surveillance (i.e., more frequent visits because of persistent hrHPV infection or absence of cytological regression). RESULTS: The follow-up regimen was recorded in 79/110 women originally recruited (72%). The need for continued intense posttreatment surveillance was associated with hrHPV infection 6 months after treatment (79.3% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001), a positive DST result at baseline and follow-up (41.4% vs. 84.0%, p < 0.001-55.2% vs. 16.0%, p < 0.001), and persistent cytological anomalies at 6 months (at an ASCUS or worse threshold, 37.9% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.028). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, a positive DST at baseline (aOR 20.1, 95%CI 2.03-199.1) was independently associated with the need for intense post-treatment surveillance multiple years after treatment. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study suggests a possible role of dual-stain cytology in predicting treatment outcome multiple years after LLETZ surgery.

Expression of p16 protein in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and a leading cause of death in women in Saudi Arabia. P16 is a tumour suppressor gene that plays a crucial role in regulating cell cycle. Several studies have investigated the significance of p16 expression in various cancer types. However, the significance of p16 in breast cancer remains controversial and insufficiently studied. The present study aims to examine the association between p16 expression and clinicopathological factors in breast cancer using immunohistochemistry staining. The study utilised 475 prospectively collected tissue samples from 475 women with breast cancer in Saudi Arabia. Nuclear and cytoplasmic immunohistochemical staining of p16 was observed in 338 (71%) of the cases and showed significant direct associations with adverse tumour features, including high tumour grade (p < 0.0001), negative oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status (p < 0.001), and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.02). Our study revealed a significant association between p16 protein expression and the established negative prognostic parameters in breast carcinoma including tumour grade, lymph node metastasis, and oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locoregional anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) in western countries. However, there have been few reports on the clinical outcomes of CCRT in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CCRT, prognostic factors, and the clinical impact of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ASCC in Japan. METHODS: Patients with locoregional ASCC were enrolled between 2007 and 2017. All patients received CCRT consisting of ≥ 45 Gy of radiation, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin C. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were estimated. Expression of p16 and PD-L1 were assessed by immunohistochemical staining (IHC). RESULTS: This study included 36 patients, of whom 30 (83.3%) were female. Among the participants, 32 (88.9%) achieved complete clinical remission, while six (16.7%) experienced recurrence. The five-year DFS and five-year OS were 72.2% and 84.7%, respectively. Grades ≥ 3 serious AEs included neutropenia in 10 (27.7%) and perianal dermatitis in eight (22.2%). In a univariate analysis, male sex, lymph node metastasis, and large tumor size were significantly associated with worse outcome. In a multivariate analysis, tumor size was an independent factor associated with short DFS. Of the 30 patients whose biopsy specimens were available for IHC, 29 (96.7%) were positive for p16, and 13 (43.3%) were positive for PD-L1. However, PD-L1 expression did not show any clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative etiology, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of CCRT observed in Japanese patients with locoregional ASCC were consistent with western data.

[Precancers of the oral mucosa: clinic, diagnostics]. / Predraki slizistoi obolochki rta: klinika i diagnostika.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study. Improving the efficiency of diagnosis and detailing the features of the clinic of «potentially malignant¼ diseases of the oral mucosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and laboratory examination of 124 patients of the department of oral mucosa diseases aged 35 to 80 years, among whom there were 75 women and 49 men, with diseases such as erythroplakia - 12 patients, verrucous leukoplakia - 52 patients, erosive form of leukoplakia - 35 patients, cheilitis Manganotti - 25 patients. Histological and immunohistochemical methods of investigation were used as diagnostics. To assess the proliferative activity of epithelial cells, the determination of the Ki-67 index was used. The synthesis of keratin 15 (K15) in epithelial layers was determined as a diagnostic criterion for the severity of neoplasia. The expression of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) antigens and p16INK4a protein in epithelial cells was studied, as well as the expression of p53 protein. RESULTS: A high prevalence of p53 mutations was observed in patients with erythroplakia. In leukoplakia, the expression of the Ki-67 protein was detected in the cell nuclei in both the basal and parabasal layers of the multilayer squamous epithelium, in 77% of cases, the expression of the p16INK4a protein in the epithelial nuclei with varying degrees of dysplastic changes was noted, and a positive reaction to HPV16 was also observed in the cell nuclei and cytoplasm of epithelial cells in the basal, parabasal and spiny epithelial layers. The appearance of K15 in the cytoplasm of cells above the basal layer with abrasive precancerous cheilitis was found in 48% of cases. CONCLUSION: To diagnose early manifestations of neoplastic processes in «potentially malignant¼ diseases of the oral mucosa, it is necessary to use both classical histological and immunohistochemical methods of investigation with various markers.

Uterine Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumors: p16 as a Surrogate for CDKN2A Deletion and Predictor of Aggressive Behavior.

Uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential. Aside from the recently described risk stratification score, which has not been validated by other studies, and rare reports of aberrant p16 expression in malignant tumors, there are no criteria to reliably predict behavior. Herein, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features and p16 expression patterns in 30 IMTs, with genomic profiling performed in a subset (13 malignant, 3 benign). Fifteen patients had malignant IMTs, defined by extrauterine disease at diagnosis (n=5) or recurrence (n=10; median: 24 mo). Patients ranged from 8 to 65 (median: 51) years and tumors from 6 to 22 (median: 12.5) cm. In primary tumors (n=13), infiltrative borders were noted in 10, moderate/severe cytologic atypia in 9, tumor cell necrosis in 7, and lymphovascular invasion in 6, while mitoses ranged from 0 to 21 (median: 7) per 10 high-power fields. In contrast, 15 patients with benign IMTs ranged from 28 to 65 (median: 44) years, with follow-up of 18 to 114 (median: 41) months. Tumors ranged from 1.9 to 8.5 (median: 5.5) cm, 2 demonstrated infiltrative borders, and 1 had moderate cytologic atypia. No other high-risk histologic features were observed. Application of the previously described clinicopathologic risk stratification score in all primary IMTs with complete data (n=18) classified 8 as high-risk (all malignant), 8 as intermediate-risk (3 malignant, 5 benign), and 2 as low-risk (benign). p16 was aberrant in all malignant IMTs, with <1% expression noted in 10, overexpression (>90%) in 4, and subclonal loss in 1; all benign tumors had patchy staining (20% to 80%; median 50%). Molecular analysis detected CDKN2A deletions in 8 of 9 tumors with <1% p16 expression, while the other harbored a TERT promoter mutation. TERT promoter mutations were also identified in 2 of 3 IMTs with p16 overexpression. Neither of these alterations was detected in the 3 sequenced benign IMTs. Thus, we recommend performing p16 on all uterine IMTs, which, combined with the risk stratification score, is a promising and cost-effective tool for predicting CDKN2A status and outcome in these patients. It may be particularly useful for tumors with incomplete information for risk stratification (ie, morcellated tumors) and for further stratifying intermediate-risk IMTs when sequencing is unavailable.

Reappraisal of p16 for Determining HPV Status of Head and Neck Carcinomas Arising in HPV Hotspots.

In an era of head and neck oncology where HPV status will soon dictate patient management, reliable HPV detection is critical. P16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is currently recommended as the test of choice for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs). The purpose of this study was to determine the performance characteristics of p16 IHC based on a large clinical experience of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) arising from HPV hot-spot regions of the head and neck. Consecutive OPSCCs, sinonasal SCCs, and metastatic SCCs of unknown primary sites were evaluated for the presence of HPV by p16 IHC and PCR-based HPV DNA testing as part of clinical care. For discrepant cases, high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and, when possible, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MassArray) genotyping were performed. 746 cancers underwent HPV testing by p16 IHC and DNA PCR genotyping. There was a 95.6% concordance between the 2 assays. Of the 33 discrepant cases, 32 cases (4.3%) were p16 positive but HPV DNA negative. In these cases, 68% were positive for mRNA ISH, invariably related to a non-16 HPV genotype. P16 IHC had an overall accuracy of 98.8%, a sensitivity of 99.8%, and a specificity of 92.1%. P16 IHC is a sensitive and specific assay for determining HPV status. HPV DNA PCR appears vulnerable to HPV genotype diversity and is prone to missing rare non-16 genotypes. HPV mRNA ISH is a practical and reliable direct measure of HPV that may help eliminate the small number of false-positive p16 cases and avoid potential patient harm related to erroneous HPV classification.

Advances in testing for human papillomavirus -mediated head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New evidence has recently emerged regarding the utility and benefits of dual p16 INKa (p16) and Human papillomavirus (HPV) status testing when determining the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: HPV RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most accurate diagnostic test. The other assays (HPV DNA PCR, HPV DNA/RNA in-situ hybridization (ISH) and p16) applied to formalin fixed tumour tissue have varying but high sensitivities and specificities. Dual p16 and HPV testing identifies discordant (p16+/HPV- or p16-/HPV+) results in 9.2% of cases, who have significantly poorer prognoses than p16+/HPV+, particularly in smokers. The proportion of discordant cases varies by region, and appears to be highest in regions with lowest attributable (p16+/HPV+) fractions. Dual testing improves prognostication for oropharyngeal cancer cases by identifying discordant cases and improving the prognostic power of the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) classification, especially in regions with high discordant rates. SUMMARY: Dual testing is essential when considering patients for clinical trials of treatment de-escalation, and may be important when counselling patients on prognosis, especially in regions with high discordant rates and in smokers.

HPV related p16INK4A and HSV in benign and potentially malignant oral mucosa pathologies.

BACKGROUND: The association of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Human Syncytial Virus (HSV) infection with inflammatory and potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity (OPMD) is unknown. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to stablish the expression of the p16INK4A and HSV proteins, to test potential correlation between those parameters in biopsies from clinically diagnosed oral lesions. METHODS: Immunochemical analysis of 211 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks from 211 individuals was provided. The clinical diagnosis included in the research were Oral lichen planus (N = 30), Oral Leukoplakia (N = 13) Mucocele (N = 25), Erosion/ulceration/ inflammation of mucosa (N = 8), Overgrowth of mucosa (N = 135). RESULTS: Two hundred eleven analyzed FFPE samples resulted with the median age of 58.5 years (the average age 54.0 years and SD ± 17 years). The female/male ratio was 2.3 (69.7% vs 30.3% respectively). All the samples positive for HSV also expressed p16INK4A (p = 0.000), that's showed various levels of association with the diverse clinical diagnosis reaching the higher level in OM 49.1% (29 positive samples) and OLP 30.5% (18). p16INK4A was associated with OLP at 30.5% (18), and fibroma 30.5%. HSV expression was mostly present in fibroma at 47.6% (10 positive samples). CONCLUSION: HSV and p16INK4A positivity in relation to diagnosis of the biopsies showed statistically most often p16INK4A in OLP and fibroma. The results of co-expression of p16INK4A and HSV in mucocele and fibroma in oral mucosa suggest a cooperation between the molecular alterations induced by these two viruses. Squamous papilloma samples positive for p16INK4A were also positive for HSV, suggesting that the putative pro-oncogenic action of HSV could be an early event.

Presence of Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA and large-T antigen in keratinocyte carcinomas and its correlation with immunohistochemical markers p16, p53 and ki67.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), a human polyomavirus that is unequivocally linked to merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), has been found in association with keratinocytes carcinomas (KC), especially basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Nevertheless, there is scarce information about the possible involvement of MCPyV in the development of KC. OBJECTIVES: To assess the presence of MCPyV DNA and Large-T Antigen (LT-Ag) via Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cases of KC, and to correlate its presence with immunohistochemical markers p16, p53, and ki67, tumor type and subtype, sun-exposed location, and epidemiological data. METHODS: The prevalence of MCPyV DNA, LT-Ag, and immunohistochemical markers p16, p53, and ki67 was assessed by PCR and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 127 cases of KC, these results were correlated with tumor type and subtype, sun-exposed location, and epidemiological data. RESULTS: The MCPyV DNA was detected in 42.57% (43 of 101) cases by PCR, the LT-Ag was detected in 16.4% (20 of 122) of cases, p16 in 81.5% (97 of 119), p53 in 66.4% (83 of 125), ki67 in 89% (73 of 82). No correlation between MCPyV LT-Ag and DNA confronted with tumor type, subtype, location site, and immunohistochemical markers was found. A single correlation between the MCPyV LT-Ag and cSCC tumors and peri-tumoral lymphocyte cells was noted. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Further steps need to be taken to better evaluate the MCPyV influence and its possible role in KC carcinogenesis, as the evaluation of the virus genome state, the gene sequence that encodes LT-Ag in the KC tumor cells, and in situ hybridization for viral DNA or RNA in these cells. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the frequent detection of MCPyV in KC, the data available so far does not support the hypothesis of a causal relationship between them.

Interobserver reproducibility of cervical histology interpretation with and without p16 immunohistochemistry.

OBJECTIVES: Histopathological diagnosis of colposcopically identified cervical lesions is a critical step for the recognition of cervical cancer precursors requiring treatment. Although there have been efforts to standardize the histologic diagnosis of cervical biopsy specimens, in terms of terminology and use of biomarkers, there is no uniform approach in the pathology community. Adjunctive p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can highlight precancer diagnoses, with use recommendations outlined by the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology project. METHODS: We assessed the diagnostic reproducibility of cervical histopathological biopsy specimens with and without p16 staining among 2 expert pathologists. RESULTS: Interpretation of p16 IHC as positive vs negative was highly reproducible (92.5% agreement, κ = 0.85); greater variation was seen in the choice of which biopsy specimens required adjunctive p16 staining (78.0% agreement, κ = 0.43). Adjunctive p16 IHC did not significantly increase diagnostic agreement under multitiered grading systems (benign vs cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 1/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion vs atypical squamous metaplasia vs CIN2/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL] vs CIN3/HSIL-CIN3 vs cancer) (65.5% agreement, κ = 0.56 without p16; 70.0% agreement, κ = 0.58 with p16). However, when dichotomizing diagnoses based on clinical management (less than HSIL vs HSIL+), diagnostic agreement increased with p16 IHC (90.5% agreement, κ = 0.79 without p16; 92.0% agreement, κ = 0.84 with p16). For biopsy specimens taken from women positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16, agreement was similar with or without adjunctive p16 (κ = 0.80 without p16; κ = 0.78-0.80 with p16). In contrast, p16 IHC substantially improved diagnostic agreement for cervical biopsy specimens taken from women positive for other high-risk HPV strains, producing improvements in κ from 0.03 to 0.24. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive p16 immunostaining provides useful information in the evaluation of cervical biopsies for precancer. In our study, we have demonstrated that it is highly reproducible between 2 pathologists, although the decision of which biopsies warrant its use is less so. Furthermore, although p16 IHC showed a limited increase in diagnostic reproducibility for all biopsies included in our study, it did demonstrate a more sizable gain in biopsies negative for HPV 16 but positive for other high-risk genotypes. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of p16 IHC and how it can be optimized for the detection of cervical precancer, particularly in HPV-vaccinated populations where types other than HPV 16 are relatively more important.

The existence of senescent cells in conjunctival epithelium from elderly individuals.

PURPOSE: The ocular surface microenvironment changes with aging. However, it remains unclear if cellular senescence influences the ocular surface. We investigated the presence of p16INK4a-expressing senescent cells in healthy human conjunctiva. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical and experimental. METHODS: Healthy conjunctival tissue samples were obtained from middle-aged and elderly subjects. RT-qPCR was performed to assess the expression of senescence markers CDKN2A (p16INK4a) and CDKN1A (p21CIP1/WAF1) and immunostaining was performed to examine the expression of the senescence marker p16INK4a, stem cell markers Ki67 and p63, tight-junction marker ZO-1. RESULTS: Our study involved 19 conjunctival tissue samples (10 elderly and 9 middle-aged), mean age [elderly: 75.8 ± 3.7 years (72-81), middle-aged: 52.7 ± 7 years (38-59)], sex (elderly: 3 men, 7 women; middle-aged: 3 men, 6 women). The expression of p16INK4a was significantly increased at the RNA level in the elderly compared to middle-aged (p < 0.05). Positivity rate of p16INK4a was significantly elevated in the elderly (15.0 ± 7.8%) compared to middle-aged (0.2 ± 0.6%) (p < 0.05). Positivity rate of Ki67and p63 was significantly reduced in the elderly (1.7 ± 1.7% and 16.5 ± 9.5%) compared to middle-aged (3.9 ± 1.8% and 24.7 ± 5.7%) (p < 0.05). ZO-1 expression was reduced in tissue samples showing p16INK4a-positivity but retained in tissue samples in which p16INK4a was undetectable. CONCLUSIONS: Senescent cells accumulate with age in the conjunctival epithelium, accompanied by a decrease in Ki67, p63 and ZO-1 expressing cells.

Circulating Tumor HPV DNA in Patients With Head and Neck Carcinoma: Correlation With HPV Genotyping.

Circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPVDNA) testing using digital-droplet polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detects fragments of tumor-modified human papillomavirus (HPV) in the plasma of patients with HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Its impact on tumor surveillance and primary diagnosis is limited by unresolved issues relating to sensitivity and specificity. The study population consisted of patients with HNSCC who had undergone ctHPVDNA testing. HPV status was determined by p16 immunohistochemistry and PCR-HPV genotyping on the tumor samples. For discrepant cases (HPV-positive/ctHPVDNA-negative), HPV status was confirmed by RNA in situ hybridization and, when possible, targeted single-nucleotide polymorphisms genotyping. A total of 167 patients had ctHPVDNA testing, and 141 tumors were HPV positive by p16 immunohistochemistry and PCR genotyping. Genotypes included types 16 (91.5%), 33 (4.3%), 35 (2.1%), and 18 (2.1%). ctHPVDNA was detected in 133 (94.3%) of HPV-positive HNSCCs but in none of the HPV-negative HNSCCs. Four of the 5 p16-positive cases that were negative by PCR and ctHPVDNA were positive by RNA in situ hybridization, and in 2 of these cases, rare high-risk genotypes were identified. ctHPVDNA had a sensitivity of 91.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 63.6%. The likelihood that patients with HPV-positive HNSCC have detectable ctHPVDNA is high. Non-HPV16 genotypes contribute to discrepancies but only in a small subset of cases. This finding validates ongoing efforts to use ctHPVDNA as a surveillance tool, and even as a primary diagnostic assay in patients presenting with masses in the neck and/or oropharynx.

High-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: comprehensive characterization and long-term vulvar carcinoma risk.

AIMS: Adequate diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and HPV-independent vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is essential but can be challenging. We comprehensively characterized a large population-based series of vulvar lesions, originally reported as high-grade VIN, and assessed the cancer risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline high-grade VIN of 751 patients were categorized by histopathological reassessment, integrating the results of immunohistochemistry (p16INK4a , p53, Ki-67) and HPV DNA testing. Integrated analyses resulted in 88.4% HPV-associated lesions (77.0% HSIL, 10.9% low-grade SIL [LSIL], and 0.4% vulvar squamous cell carcinoma [VSCC]), 10.9% HPV-independent lesions (6.1% HPV-independent VIN, 4.7% nondysplastic lesions, and 0.1% VSCC) and 1.1% inconclusive lesions. HSIL demonstrated p16INK4a block-positivity in 99.0%, increased Ki-67 in ≥2/3rd of the epithelium in 93.6%, and HPV positivity in 99.6%. In HSIL, a p53 wildtype mid-epithelial staining pattern was common (51.6%) while this was not observed in HPV-independent lesions. HPV-independent VIN harboured mutant p53 patterns in 65.2% and showed a wide morphological spectrum, ranging from differentiated to nondifferentiated ('HPV-associated-like', in 41.3%). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a 10-year cancer risk of 8.0% in HPV-associated HSIL, 67.4% in HPV-independent VIN/p53mutant, and 27.8% in HPV-independent VIN/p53wildtype. Strikingly, the 10-year cancer risk was 73.3% in HPV-independent VIN with nondifferentiated ('HPV-associated-like') morphology. CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry by p16INK4a and p53 is highly recommended for optimal categorization into HPV-associated and HPV-independent VIN, which is of utmost importance given the different cancer risk. The high cancer risk of HPV-independent VIN underscores the need for surgical treatment and close follow-up, especially in case of a p53 mutant pattern and/or nondifferentiated morphology.