Coagulation abnormalities in the cirrhotic patient.

The clotting process is a dynamic array of multiple processes which can be described in four phases: platelet plug initiation and formation, clotting process propagation by the coagulation cascade, clotting termination by antithrombotic mechanisms and clot removal by fibrinolysis. The liver plays a central role in each of these phases of clotting process, as it synthesizes the majority of coagulation factors and proteins involved in fibrinolysis as well as thrombopoeitin, which is responsible for platelet production from megakaryocytes. Many pathological processes associated with cirrhosis, such as portal hypertension and endothelial dysfunction, as well as co-morbid conditions, may also alter the coagulation process. Consequently, patients with liver disease have a disturbed balance of procoagulant and anti-coagulant factors which deviates from the normal coagulation cascade. This situation poses an additional problem in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this group of patients, since traditional coagulation test may not be reliable for assessing bleeding or thrombotic risk and traditional transfusional strategies may not be applicable in cirrhotic patients. In this article, we review the pathophysiological bases of coagulation abnormalities, in cirrhotic patients, the diagnostic therapeutic strategies to be followed and its impact on the clinical outcome in the cirrhotic patient.

Severe haemophilia A patients have reduced numbers of peripheral memory B cells.

The development of inhibitors is a complication of replacement treatment in Haemophilia. Loss of factor VIII-specific memory B cells in the spleen is associated with down regulation of antibodies in mice treated with high doses of FVIII, but changes in B cell memory have not been described in haemophilic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the phenotype of circulating lymphocytes in severe haemophilia A. Twenty patients with inhibitors (PI), 22 without inhibitors (P), nine patients during immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment and 20 healthy donors (HD) were included. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were examined using flow cytometry. Anti-FVIII antibodies were measured using Bethesda and flow cytometry. Percentages of T subsets and B lymphocytes were similar in all groups. In contrast, memory B cells (CD27+) were decreased in PI and P compared with HD, but the level of significance was higher in PI (P = 0.001) than P (P = 0.01). PI with high level of anti-FVIII antibodies presented the lowest B memory values. CD70 expression was also lowest in PI. Non-switched CD27+ subpopulation (IgD+) was prevalent in PI, but did not show statistical significance. When ITI failed, the percentages of CD27+ B cells after 12 months of ITI were lowest. In a longitudinal study performed in four patients, an increased percentage of CD27+ and CD70+ B cells during ITI was found. This work suggests that different peripheral lymphocyte markers, such as CD27 and CD70 on B cells, may be helpful to evaluate anti-FVIII response and to monitor the success of ITI.

Evaluation of the blood coagulation mechanism and platelet aggregation in individuals with mechanical or biological heart prostheses.

Oral anticoagulants have been widely employed to decrease thrombotic risk by reducing the levels of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. Paradoxically, the use of oral anticoagulants also decreases the levels of natural anticoagulants (protein C and protein S), which favors the hypercoagulability state. Increased platelet activation has been reported in patients undergoing warfarin treatment. These findings have raised questions about the antagonistic effect of oral anticoagulants and their implications for hemostatic balance. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between warfarin dosage and prothrombin time [International Normalized Ratio (INR)], platelet aggregation, vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, and protein C and protein S. Blood samples from 27 patients were analyzed, seven with mechanical prostheses and 20 with biological prostheses, and 27 controls. Multiple regression analysis showed that factor II most significantly determines the INR. Results showed that the INR, clotting factors, and protein C and protein S activity did not correlate with warfarin dosage, highlighting the need for accurate laboratory monitoring of those undergoing anticoagulant therapy.