Reducing Unnecessary Instruments in Tonsil Hemorrhage Trays at a Canadian Tertiary Care Center: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: In the emergency department (ED), there are pre-assembled tonsillar hemorrhage trays for management of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage and peritonsillar abscess. After use, the tray is sent to the medical device reprocessing (MDR) department for decontamination, sterilization, and re-organization, all at a significant cost to the hospital and environment. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this project was to reduce unnecessary instruments on the tonsil hemorrhage tray by 30% by 1 year and report on the associated cost and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions savings. METHODS: This quality improvement project was framed according to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement. ED and Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery staff and residents were surveyed to determine which instruments on the tonsil hemorrhage trays were used regularly. Based on results, a new tray was developed and compared to the old tray using MDR data and existing CO2 emissions calculations. RESULTS: Tray optimization resulted in a total cost reduction from $1092.63 to $330.21 per tray per year, decreased processing time from 12 to 6-8 minutes per tray, and decreased CO2 emissions from 6.11 to 2.85 kg per year for the old versus new tray, respectively. Overall, the new tray contains half the number of instruments, takes half the time to assemble, produces 50% less CO2 emissions, and will save the hospital approximately $100,000 over 10 years. CONCLUSION: Healthcare costs and environmental sustainability are collective responsibilities. Surgical and procedure tray optimization is a simple, effective, and scalable form of eco-action.

Surgical advantage of modified labial salivary gland biopsy using chalazion forceps: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Labial salivary gland biopsy (LSGB) is one of the specific diagnostic criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). In traditional LSGB, there is no lower lip fixation device, the field of view is unclear due to intraoperative bleeding, and the incision is large, which is unfavourable for healing. The use of auxiliary devices to improve the shortcomings of traditional LSGB technique would be meaningful. Therefore, this case-control study aimed to assess the value of modified LSGB using chalazion forceps as compared with traditional LSGB. After obtaining written informed consent from all participating parents and patients, we randomly assigned 217 eligible participants to undergo LSGB using chalazion forceps (n = 125) or traditional LSGB (n = 92). The outcome variables were surgical time, incision length, intraoperative bleeding, pain score at 24 h after surgery, incision healing status at 7 days after surgery, gland collection, and pathological results. The final diagnostic results of the two surgical methods were compared, and the match rates between the pathological results and the final clinical diagnoses were compared between the two groups. The data were analysed using parametric and nonparametric tests. Compared with the traditional group, the modified group had a smaller incision, shorter operative time, less blood loss, lower 24 h pain score, and better Grade A incision healing at 7 days after surgery (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between the patients in the two surgical-method groups in terms of the positive biopsy results and the final diagnosis based on expert opinions (p > 0.05). By multivariable regression analysis, only a focus score (FS) of ≥ 1 (p < 0.01), dry eye disease (p < 0.05) and anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) titre ≥ 1:320 (p < 0.05) were correlated with the diagnosis of pSS. The positive biopsy results of patients in the different surgical-method groups had a biopsy accuracy of > 80.0% for the diagnosis of pSS. The positive biopsy results in the different surgical-method groups were consistent with the expert opinions and the 2016 ACR-EULAR primary SS classification criteria. The modified LSGB using an auxiliary chalazion forceps offers a good safety with a small incision, shorter operative time, less bleeding, reduced pain and a low incidence of postoperative complications.The match rate of LSGB pathological results of the proposed surgical procedure with the final diagnosis of pSS is high.

Design and validation a minimally invasive robotic surgical instrument with decoupled pose and multi-DOF.

High-performance miniature surgical instruments play an important role in complicated minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Based on in-depth analysis of the requirements of MIS and the characteristics of the existing minimally invasive surgical instruments, a multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) robotic surgical instrument with decoupled pose was proposed. Firstly, the design concept of the pose decoupling instrument was described in detail, and its physical structure, transmission structure, and mechanical properties were designed and analyzed. A surgical instrument control algorithm based on the master-slave mode was established. Finally, a physical prototype was developed, and its motion ranges of joints, load capacity, and suture operation performance were comprehensively evaluated, which confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed minimally invasive robotic surgical instrument.

Validity of rapid urease test using swab of gastric mucus to mucosal forceps and 13 C-urease breath test: a multicenter prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Theoretically, a rapid urease test (RUT) using a swab of the gastric wall (Swab-RUT) for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is safe. However, the validity and utility of Swab-RUT remain unclear. Therefore, we assessed the validity and utility of Swab-RUT compared to RUT using mucosal forceps of the gastric wall (Forceps-RUT) and 13C-urea breath test (UBT). METHODS: This study was a multicenter prospective observational study. When the examinees were suspected of H. pylori infection during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, we performed Swab-RUT and Forceps-RUT continuously. When the examinees were not suspected of H. pylori infection, we performed Swab-RUT alone. We validated the status of H. pylori infection using UBT. RESULTS: Ninety-four examinees were enrolled from four institutions between May 2016 and December 2020 (median age [range], 56.5 [26-88] years). In this study, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Swab-RUT to UBT were 0.933 (95% confidence interval: 0.779-0.992), 0.922 (0.827-0.974), and 0.926 (0.853-0.970), respectively. The Kappa coefficient of Swab-RUT to UBT was 0.833, and that of Swab-RUT to forceps-RUT was 0.936. No complications were observed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Swab-RUT is a valid examination for the status of H. pylori infection compared to the conventional Forceps-RUT.

Maxillary labial frenectomy: a randomized, controlled comparative study of two blue (445 nm) and infrared (980 nm) diode lasers versus surgical scalpel.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the intra and postoperative complications of frenectomy procedure with a surgical scalpel versus 445 nm and 980 nm diode lasers. METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 174 patients requiring maxillary labial frenectomy. After completion of fixed orthodontic treatment and primary closure of maxillary diastema, the patients were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 58): group 1 (frenectomy via 445 nm diode laser, continuous-wave, 1.5 W), group 2 (frenectomy via 980 nm laser, continuous-wave, 1.7 W), and control group (V-Y plasty technique via scalpel). Intra-operative bleeding, discomfort in chewing and speaking, pain, and tissue healing were compared among the groups immediately, at 7 and 30 days postoperatively using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 (immediately and day 7, P < 0.05). Significant faster tissue healing at days 7 and 30 were observed in group 1 compared to group 2 (P < 0.05). Group 1 was superior to the control group regarding lower intraoperative bleeding, discomfort in chewing and speaking (immediately and day 7), lower pain (immediately and day 7), and tissue healing (day 7) (P < 0.05 for all). Group 2 was significantly superior to the control group in lower intraoperative bleeding, discomfort in chewing and speaking (immediately and day 7), and better tissue healing (day 7) (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, diode laser frenectomy resulted in significantly lower intra and postoperative complications compared to the scalpel. Moreover, 445 nm diode laser showed significantly superior effects compared to 980 nm diode laser. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on 29.10.2022 at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( www.irct.ir ) (registration number: IRCT20220630055326N1).

Raney clip left behind the titanium mesh after cranial surgery: Case report.

RATIONALE: Raney clips are commonly used in neurosurgical procedures to hold the scalp in place and stop bleeding during surgery. The removal of Raney clips is often the last process during cranial surgery prior to the closure of skin incision. Thus, a Raney clip found underneath the titanium mesh resulting in fever is a very rare occurrence. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 18-year-old male patient underwent cranial surgery due to intracranial abscess in the frontal lobe and subsequently underwent frontal skull repair using titanium mesh during which a Raney clip was unintentional left underneath the titanium mesh resulting in fever. DIAGNOSIS: A thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan was used to identify the Raney clip. INTERVENTION: A third surgery was performed to remove the Raney clip. OUTCOMES: The patient fever total resolved after the third surgery with no further neurological deficits and 2-years follow-up revealed the patient is well and go about his daily activities. LESSONS: It is crucial to ensure that all foreign objects are removed after the surgery by counting all instruments used at and after each step during the operation, including all Raney clips. This will help prevent complications and ensure the safety as well as the well-being of the patient.

Minimally invasive keyhole craniotomies for microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms: comparative meta-analysis of the mini-pterional and supraorbital keyhole approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Axel Perneczky is responsible for conceptualizing the "keyhole" philosophy as a new paradigm of minimal invasiveness within cranial neurosurgery. Keyhole neurosurgery aims to limit approach-related traumatization and minimize brain retraction while still enabling the neurosurgeon to achieve operative goals. The supraorbital keyhole craniotomy (SOKC) and minipterional (pterional keyhole, PKC) approaches have become mainstays for clipping intracranial aneurysms. While studies have compared these approaches to the traditional pterional craniotomy for clipping cerebral aneurysms, head-to-head comparisons of these workhorse keyhole approaches remain limited. METHODS: The authors queried three databases per PRISMA guidelines to identify all studies comparing the SOKC to the PKC for microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms. Of 148 unique studies returned on initial query, a total of 5 studies published between 2013 and 2019 met inclusion criteria. Where applicable, quantitative meta-analysis was performed via the Mantel-Haenszel method using Review Manager v5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool, and all studies were assigned a Level of Evidence (I-V). RESULTS: Across all five studies, the mean age ranged from 53.0 to 57.5 years old, and the cohort consisted of more females (n = 403, 60.6%) than males. The proportion of patients presenting with ruptured aneurysmal SAH was comparable between the SOKC and PKC cohorts (p = 0.43). Clipping rate [defined as the rate of successful aneurysm clip deployment with successful intraoperative occlusion] (OR 1.52 [0.49, 4.71], I2 = 0%, p = 0.47), final occlusion rates (OR 1.27 [0.37, 4.32], p = 0.70), and operative durations (SMD 0.33 [-0.83. 1.49], I2 = 97%, p = 0.58) were comparable regardless of approach used. Furthermore, rates of intraoperative rupture (OR 1.51 [0.64, 3.55], I2 = 0, p = 0.34), postoperative hemorrhage (OR 1.49 [0.74, 3.01], I2 = 0, p = 0.26), postoperative vasospasm (OR 0.94 [0.49, 1.80], I2 = 63, p = 0.86), and postoperative infection (OR 0.70 [0.16, 2.99], I2 = 0%, p = 0.63) were equivocal across SOKC and PKC cohorts. CONCLUSION: The PKC and SOKC approaches appear to afford comparable outcomes when used for open microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms in select patients with both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Both are associated with excellent clipping and occlusion rates, minimal perioperative complication profiles, and favorable postoperative neurologic outcomes. Further investigations are merited so clinicians can further parse out the indications and contraindications for each keyhole approach.

Microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy for treating patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms.

Studies comparing different treatment methods in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms in different subgroups of onset symptoms are lacking. It is necessary to explore the safety and efficacy of open surgical treatment and endovascular therapy in patients with MCA aneurysms in a specific population. This study aimed to compare microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy regarding complication rates and outcomes in patients with MCA aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms. This was a retrospective cohort study in which 9656 patients with intracranial aneurysms were screened between January 2014 and July 2022. Further, 130 eligible patients were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) within 30 days of treatment, whereas secondary outcomes included postprocedural target vessel-related stroke, disabling stroke or death, mortality, and aneurysm occlusion rate. Among the 130 included patients, 45 were treated with endovascular therapy and 85 with microsurgical clipping. The primary outcome of the incidence of SAEs within 30 days of treatment was significantly higher in the clipping group [clipping: 23.5%(20/85) vs endovascular: 8.9%(4/45), adjusted OR:4.05, 95% CI:1.20-13.70; P = 0.024]. The incidence of any neurological complications related to the treatment was significantly higher in the clipping group [clipping:32.9%(28/85) vs endovascular:15.6%(7/45); adjusted OR:3.49, 95%CI:1.18-10.26; P = 0.023]. Postprocedural target vessel-related stroke, disabling stroke or death, mortality rate, and complete occlusion rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. Endovascular therapy seemed to be safer in treating patients with MCA aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms compared with microsurgical clipping, with a significantly lower incidence of SAEs within 30 days of treatment and any neurological complications related to the treatment during follow-up.

Partial coil embolization before surgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative rupture (IOR) is the most common adverse event encountered during surgical clip obliteration of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Besides increasing surgeon experience and early proximal control, no methods exist to decrease IOR risk. Thus, our objective was to assess if partial endovascular coil embolization to protect the aneurysm before clipping decreases IOR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms that were treated with surgical clipping at two tertiary academic centers. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes of those who underwent partial endovascular coil embolization to protect the aneurysm before clipping to those who did not. The primary outcome was IOR. Secondary outcomes were inpatient mortality and discharge destination. RESULTS: We analyzed 100 patients. Partial endovascular aneurysm protection was performed in 27 patients. Age, sex, subarachnoid hemorrhage severity, and aneurysm location were similar between the partially-embolized and non-embolized groups. The median size of the partially-embolized aneurysms was larger (7.0 mm [interquartile range 5.95-8.7] vs. 4.6 mm [3.3-6.0]; P < 0.001). During surgical clipping, IOR occurred less frequently in the partially-embolized aneurysms than non-embolized aneurysms (2/27, 7.4%, vs. 30/73, 41%; P = 0.001). Inpatient mortality was 14.8% (4/27) in patients with partially-embolized aneurysms and 28.8% (21/73) in patients without embolization (P = 0.20). Discharge to home or inpatient rehabilitation was 74.0% in patients with partially-embolized aneurysms and 56.2% in patients without embolization (P = 0.11). A complication from partial embolization occurred in 2/27 (7.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative partial endovascular coil embolization of ruptured aneurysms is associated with a reduced frequency of IOR during definitive treatment with surgical clip obliteration. These results and the impact of preoperative partial endovascular coil embolization on functional outcomes should be confirmed with a randomized trial.

The Use of Clips to Prevent Post-Polypectomy Bleeding: A Clinical Review.

GOALS: The goal of this clinical review is to provide an overview of the current literature regarding the utility of prophylactic clips in reducing postpolypectomy bleeding and to provide an expert statement regarding their appropriateness in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy enables the identification and removal of premalignant and malignant lesions through polypectomy, yet complications including postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) can arise. While various studies have explored applying clips prophylactically to prevent PPB, their effectiveness remains uncertain. STUDY: A literature search conducted in PubMed and Embase identified 671 publications discussing clip use postpolypectomy; 67 were found to be relevant after screening, reporting outcomes related to PPB. Data related to clip utilization, polyp characteristics, and adverse events were extracted and discussed. RESULTS: The current literature suggests that prophylactic clipping is most beneficial for nonpedunculated polyps ≥20 mm, especially those in the proximal colon. The utility of clipping smaller polyps and those in the distal colon remains less clear. Antithrombotic medication usage, particularly anticoagulants, has been linked to an increased risk of bleeding, prompting consideration for clip placement in this patient subgroup. While cost-effectiveness analyses may indicate potential savings, the decision to clip should be tailored to individual patient factors and polyp characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Current research suggests that the application of prophylactic clips can be particularly beneficial in preventing delayed bleeding after removal of large nonpedunculated polyps, especially for those in the proximal colon and in patients on antithrombotic medications. In addition, for large pedunculated polyps prophylactic clipping is most effective at controlling immediate bleeding.