Sujet(s)
Hépatectomie , Laparoscopie , Chirurgiens , Humains , Études rétrospectives , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Hépatectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Hépatectomie/méthodes , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Chirurgiens/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé , Tumeurs du foie/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Radical surgery remains the primary option for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) as it has the potential to considerably extend the patient's lifespan. At present, the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for LRRC remains unclear. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with LRRC who were admitted to the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients were categorized into two groups, namely the open group and the laparoscopic group, based on the surgical method used. Propensity score matching was used to reduce baseline differences. The short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Curative surgery was performed on 111 patients who were diagnosed with LRRC. After propensity score matching, a total of 80 patients were included and divided into the laparoscopic group (40 patients) and the open group (40 patients). The laparoscopic group had less intraoperative bleeding (100 vs. 300, P = 0.011), a lower postoperative complication rate (20.0% vs. 42.5%, P = 0.030), a lower incidence of wound infection (0 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.026), and a shorter time to first flatus (2 vs. 3, P = 0.005). The laparoscopic group had higher 3-year overall survival (85.4% vs. 57.5%, P = 0.016) and 3-year disease-free survival (63.9% vs 36.5%, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery is linked to less bleeding during the operation, quicker recovery after the surgery, and a lower incidence of infections at the surgical site. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery for LRRC might yield superior long-term survival outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Laparoscopie , Récidive tumorale locale , Score de propension , Tumeurs du rectum , Humains , Tumeurs du rectum/chirurgie , Tumeurs du rectum/mortalité , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Laparoscopie/effets indésirables , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Récidive tumorale locale/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Facteurs temps , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Perte sanguine peropératoire/statistiques et données numériques , AdulteRÉSUMÉ
The robotic approach improves the feasibility of minimally invasive colectomy even where there may be an anatomic challenge with laparoscopy. Whether a failure in completing colectomy with this newer technology is associated with worse consequences needs to be considered when evaluating the relative benefit of robotic colectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate rates of conversion to open surgery after robotic and laparoscopic colectomy and whether outcomes after conversion vary after the two techniques since this has not been well studied. From the American College of Surgeons (ACS) - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) (2015-2016), patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomy were identified. Converted robotic were compared to laparoscopic procedures for patient demographics, co-morbidities; primary procedure and diagnosis, prolonged operation and postoperative complications. Of 36,046 colectomy procedures, 30,808 (85.5%) were laparoscopic, while 5238 (14.5%) were robotic-assisted. There were 3271 (9.1%) conversions to open surgery (laparoscopic: 2959 [9.6%]; robotic: 312 [6%]). Thirty-day postoperative surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, sepsis, bleeding requiring transfusion, urinary tract infection, reoperation; pulmonary, renal, cardiac/cerebrovascular complications; readmission, hospital stay, and mortality, were similar between the two groups. However, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism was higher after robotic conversion (4.5% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.01). Conversion was lower after robotic when compared to laparoscopic colectomy. Converted patients had similar outcomes except for vein thromboembolism which was higher after robotic surgery. Robotic technology seems to improve the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery without negatively affecting safety and efficacy even when conversion is required.
Sujet(s)
Colectomie , Conversion en chirurgie ouverte , Laparoscopie , Complications postopératoires , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées , Humains , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/méthodes , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/statistiques et données numériques , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/effets indésirables , Colectomie/méthodes , Colectomie/effets indésirables , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Sujet âgé , Conversion en chirurgie ouverte/statistiques et données numériques , Résultat thérapeutique , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Réintervention/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we collected data over 8 years (2012-2019) from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) tumor registry to determine the status of endometrial cancer in Japan, and analyzed detailed clinicopathological factors. METHODS: The JSOG maintains a tumor registry that gathers information on endometrial cancer treated at the JSOG-registered institutions. Data from the patients whose endometrial cancer treatment was initiated from 2012 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 82,969 patients with endometrial cancer underwent treatment from 2012 to 2019. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with hormonal therapy is more common among endometrial cancer patients under 40 years compared with those over 40 years. The number of patients with endometrial cancer, treated with laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery was observed to have increased yearly. Small cell carcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas were more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage. Lymphadenectomy was most commonly performed for stage IIIC2 disease, whereas positive peritoneal washing cytology was most common for stage IVB and serous carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Multi-year summary reports provided detailed clinicopathological information regarding endometrial cancer that could not be obtained in a single year. These reports were useful in understanding treatment strategies and trends over time based on age, histology, and stage.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de l'endomètre , Stadification tumorale , Enregistrements , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs de l'endomètre/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs de l'endomètre/thérapie , Tumeurs de l'endomètre/chirurgie , Japon/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Études rétrospectives , Lymphadénectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plusRÉSUMÉ
Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) is commonly performed for patients with colon cancer, selecting between intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA). However, the impact of ICA versus ECA on patient outcomes remains debatable. The varying levels of experience among surgeons may influence the outcomes. Therefore, this study sought to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of LRHC using ICA versus ECA. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study extracted patient data from the medical records database of Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan, from 2017 to 2020. Patients with colon cancer who underwent LRHC with either ICA or ECA were included. Primary outcomes were post-surgical outcomes and secondary outcomes were recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Between-group differences were compared using chi-square, t-tests, and Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Associations between study variables, OS, and CSS were determined using Cox analyses. Results: Data of 240 patients (61 of ICA and 179 of ECA) with a mean age of 65.0 years and median follow-up of 49.3 months were collected. No recognized difference was found in patient characteristics between these two groups. The ICA group had a significantly shorter operation duration (median (IQR): 120 (110-155) vs. 150 (130-180) min) and less blood loss (median (IQR): 30 (10-30) vs. 30 (30-50) mL) than the ECA group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in 30-day readmission (ICA vs. ECA: 1.6% vs. 2.2%, p > 0.999) or recurrence (18.0% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.377) between the two groups. Multivariable analyses revealed no significant differences in OS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-1.44) or CSS (adjusted sub-hazard ratio (aSHR): 0.41, 95% CI: 0.10-1.66) between groups. Conclusions: Both ICA and ECA in LRHC for colon cancer had similar outcomes without statistically significant differences in post-surgical complications, 30-day readmission rates, recurrence rate, and long-term survival outcomes. However, ICA may offer two advantages in terms of a shorter operative duration and reduced blood loss.
Sujet(s)
Anastomose chirurgicale , Colectomie , Tumeurs du côlon , Laparoscopie , Humains , Tumeurs du côlon/chirurgie , Tumeurs du côlon/mortalité , Mâle , Colectomie/méthodes , Femelle , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé , Études rétrospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , Anastomose chirurgicale/méthodes , Résultat thérapeutique , Taïwan/épidémiologieRÉSUMÉ
Background: The role of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in patients requiring surgery for gastric GISTs. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 4, 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the literature to select all types of analytic studies comparing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for GISTs and reporting intraoperative, postoperative, and/or pathological outcomes. Results: Overall, 4 retrospective studies were selected, including a total of 264 patients, specifically 111 (42%) in the robotic and 153 (58%) in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operating time (+42.46 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.34, 75.58; P=0.01; I2: 85%) and reduced use of mechanical staplers (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.11; P<0.00001; I2: 92%;) compared with laparoscopy. Although nonsignificant, conversion to open surgery was less frequently reported for robotic surgery (2.7%) than laparoscopy (5.2%) (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.17, 2.03; P=0.4; I2: 0%). No difference was found for postoperative and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for gastric GISTs provides similar intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes to laparoscopy, despite longer operative time.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales , Laparoscopie , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées , Tumeurs de l'estomac , Tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales/chirurgie , Tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales/anatomopathologie , Humains , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/méthodes , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/statistiques et données numériques , Tumeurs de l'estomac/chirurgie , Tumeurs de l'estomac/anatomopathologie , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Durée opératoire , Gastrectomie/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
To develop a nomogram model for predicting contralateral patent processus vaginalis in children with unilateral inguinal hernia or hydrocele. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 259 children with unilateral inguinal hernia or hydrocele who underwent laparoscopic surgery at the Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University from January 2021 to December 2023. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 207) and a validation set (n = 52) in an 8:2 ratio to analyze the characteristics of CPPV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen for independent risk factors for CPPV, and a nomogram prediction model was constructed. The predictive ability, calibration, and clinical net benefit of the model were evaluated by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves (HL), and clinical decision curves (DCA). Among children under 1 year old, the laparoscopic exploration revealed a CPPV incidence rate of 55.17%. The incidence rates for children aged 2-10 years ranged from 29.03 to 39.13%, and the incidence rate for children aged 11-14 years was 21.21%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR = 0.9, 95%CI 0.82-0.99, P = 0.035) and female gender (OR = 2.42, 95%CI 1.21-4.83, P = 0.013) were independent risk factors for CPPV, and the incidence of CPPV decreased with age. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training set of the constructed model was 0.632, and the AUC for the validation set was 0.708. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated good model fit (training set P = 0.085, validation set P = 0.221), and the DCA curve suggested good clinical benefit.The nomogram model developed in this study demonstrates good clinical value. Children with unilateral inguinal hernia or hydrocele who are younger in age and female gender should undergo careful intraoperative exploration for the presence of CPPV. What is Known: ⢠The probability of developing inguinal hernia in children with CPPV is 11%-25%, and redo surgery can increase surgical risks and financial burden. ⢠The risk factors of unilateral inguinal hernia combined with CPPV are controversial. What is New: ⢠Age and female gender are independent risk factors for CPPV. ⢠A nomogram prediction model was constructed to provide a theoretical basis as well as an assessment tool for preoperative evaluation of whether children with unilateral indirect inguinal hernia are susceptible to CPPV.
Sujet(s)
Hernie inguinale , Nomogrammes , Hydrocèle , Humains , Enfant , Mâle , Hernie inguinale/chirurgie , Hernie inguinale/épidémiologie , Hernie inguinale/diagnostic , Hydrocèle/épidémiologie , Hydrocèle/chirurgie , Hydrocèle/diagnostic , Femelle , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Études rétrospectives , Adolescent , Nourrisson , Facteurs de risque , Appréciation des risques/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Courbe ROCRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Retrorectal tumors are uncommon lesions developed in the retrorectal space. Data on their minimally invasive resection are scarce and the optimal surgical approach for tumors below S3 remains debated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive resection of retrorectal tumors between 2005 and 2022 at two tertiary university hospital centers, by comparing the results obtained for lesions located above or below S3. RESULTS: Of over 41 patients identified with retrorectal tumors, surgical approach was minimally invasive for 23 patients, with laparoscopy alone in 19, with transanal excision in 2, and with combined approach in 2. Retrorectal tumor was above S3 in 11 patients (> S3 group) and below S3 in 12 patients (< S3 group). Patient characteristics and median tumor size were not significantly different between the two groups (60 vs 67 mm; p = 0.975). Overall median operative time was 131.5 min and conversion rate was 13% without significant difference between the two groups (126 vs 197 min and 18% vs 8%, respectively; p > 0.05). Final pathology was tailgut cyst (48%), schwannoma (22%), neural origin tumor (17%), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (4%), and other (19%). The 90-day complication rates were 27% and 58% in the > S3 and < S3 groups, respectively, without severe morbidity or mortality. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, no recurrence was observed in both groups. Three patients presented chronic pain, three anal dysfunction, and three urinary dysfunction. All were successfully managed without reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors can be performed safely and effectively with low morbidity and no mortality. Laparoscopic and transanal techniques alone or in combination may be recommended as the treatment of choice of benign retrorectal tumors, even for lesions below S3, in centers experienced with minimally invasive surgery.
Sujet(s)
Laparoscopie , Tumeurs du rectum , Centres de soins tertiaires , Humains , Études rétrospectives , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé , Tumeurs du rectum/chirurgie , Tumeurs du rectum/anatomopathologie , Centres de soins tertiaires/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Durée opératoire , Résultat thérapeutique , Chirurgie endoscopique transanale/méthodes , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Rectum/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer has created a significant burden worldwide, including in Iran. Open and laparoscopic surgery are important treatment methods for this disease. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in Iran, with a particular emphasis on controlling confounding factors. METHODS: To control confounding factors in between-group comparisons of observational studies, a method based on propensity scores was used. The current study was conducted on 916 patients with colorectal cancer in the city of Shiraz between the years 2011 to 2022. The required data regarding treatment outcomes, type of surgery, demographic characteristics, and clinical factors related to cancer was extracted from the Colorectal Cancer Research Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. To control confounding factors, we used the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) as one of the analytical approaches based on Propensity Score analysis. After IPTW analysis, univariate logistic regression was used for treatment effect estimation. Stata 17 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for 24 clinical and demographic covariates, negative post-operative outcomes were significantly lower in laparoscopic than open surgery. There were significant differences between the two groups of surgery in the percentages of death due to cancer (P < 0.01), recurrence (P < 0.01), and metastasis (P < 0.05). The treatment effect univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that laparoscopic surgery reduced the risk of negative postoperative outcomes including death due to cancer (OR = 0.411, P < 0.01), recurrence (OR = 0.343, P < 0.01) and metastasis (OR = 0.611, P < 0.05) compared to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of postoperative outcomes including cancer-related mortality, recurrence, and metastasis, the laparoscopic surgery outperformed open surgery. Therefore, further development of laparoscopic surgery can lead to better health outcomes for the population and optimize the utilization of healthcare resources.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs colorectales , Laparoscopie , Score de propension , Humains , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Iran/épidémiologie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Résultat thérapeutique , Tumeurs colorectales/chirurgie , Tumeurs colorectales/mortalité , Sujet âgé , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , AdulteRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: With the primary objective of addressing the disparity in global surgical care access, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) trains surgeons. While sufficient operative experience is crucial for surgical training, the extent of utilization of minimally invasive techniques during COSECSA training remains understudied. METHODS: We conducted an extensive review of COSECSA general surgery trainees' operative case logs from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, focusing on the utilization of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of laparoscopic procedures and compare this to open procedures. We analyzed the distribution of laparoscopic cases across common indications such as cholecystectomy, appendicitis, and hernia operations. Additionally, we examined the impact of trainee autonomy, country development index, and hospital type on laparoscopy utilization. RESULTS: Among 68,659 total cases, only 616 (0.9%) were laparoscopic procedures. Notably, 34 cases were conducted during trainee external rotations in countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and India. Gallbladder and appendix pathologies were most frequent among the 582 recorded laparoscopic cases performed in Africa. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accounted for 29% (276 of 975 cases), laparoscopic appendectomy for 3% (76 of 2548 cases), and laparoscopic hernia repairs for 0.5% (26 of 5620 cases). Trainees self-reported lower autonomy for laparoscopic (22.5%) than open cases (61.5%). Laparoscopy usage was more prevalent in upper-middle-income (2.7%) and lower-middle-income countries (0.8%) compared with lower-income countries (0.5%) (p < 0.001). Private (1.6%) and faith-based hospitals (1.5%) showed greater laparoscopy utilization than public hospitals (0.5%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the relatively low utilization of minimally invasive techniques in surgical training within the ECSA region. Laparoscopic cases remain a minority, with variations observed based on specific diagnoses. The findings suggest a need to enhance exposure to minimally invasive procedures to ensure well-rounded training and proficiency in these techniques.
Sujet(s)
Laparoscopie , Humains , Laparoscopie/enseignement et éducation , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Afrique de l'Est , Afrique australe/épidémiologie , Afrique centrale , Appendicectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Appendicectomie/enseignement et éducation , Appendicectomie/méthodes , Cholécystectomie laparoscopique/enseignement et éducation , Cholécystectomie laparoscopique/statistiques et données numériques , Herniorraphie/enseignement et éducation , Herniorraphie/statistiques et données numériques , Herniorraphie/méthodes , Chirurgie générale/enseignement et éducation , Chirurgie générale/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
AIM: Recent evidence challenges the current standard of offering surgery to patients with ileocaecal Crohn's disease (CD) only when they present complications of the disease. The aim of this study was to compare short-term results of patients who underwent primary ileocaecal resection for either inflammatory (luminal disease, earlier in the disease course) or complicated phenotypes, hypothesizing that the latter would be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. METHOD: A retrospective, multicentre comparative analysis was performed including patients operated on for primary ileocaecal CD at 12 referral centres. Patients were divided into two groups according to indication of surgery for inflammatory (ICD) or complicated (CCD) phenotype. Short-term results were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2013 patients were included, with 291 (14.5%) in the ICD group. No differences were found between the groups in time from diagnosis to surgery. CCD patients had higher rates of low body mass index, anaemia (40.9% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and low albumin (11.3% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). CCD patients had longer operations, lower rates of laparoscopic approach (84.3% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.001) and higher conversion rates (9.3% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001). CCD patients had a longer hospital stay and higher postoperative complication rates (26.1% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.083). Anastomotic leakage and reoperations were also more frequent in this group. More patients in the CCD group required an extended bowel resection (14.1% vs. 8.3%, p: 0.017). In multivariate analysis, CCD was associated with prolonged surgery (OR 3.44, p = 0.001) and the requirement for multiple intraoperative procedures (OR 8.39, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Indication for surgery in patients who present with an inflammatory phenotype of CD was associated with better outcomes compared with patients operated on for complications of the disease. There was no difference between groups in time from diagnosis to surgery.
Sujet(s)
Maladie de Crohn , Iléum , Phénotype , Complications postopératoires , Humains , Maladie de Crohn/chirurgie , Maladie de Crohn/complications , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Mâle , Adulte , Résultat thérapeutique , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Iléum/chirurgie , Jeune adulte , Caecum/chirurgie , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Laparoscopie/effets indésirables , Durée opératoire , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Facteurs tempsRÉSUMÉ
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) regarding postoperative pain, recurrence rates, duration of hospital stay and other postoperative outcomes within the context of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India, and the initial experience of laparoscopic repairs. The current consensus in the literature often suggests LIHR as superior to open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR). Methods: This single-centre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research, Puducherry, India, from January 2011 to September 2020. All patients who underwent elective OIHR and LIHR were included. Data on the patients demographics, comorbidities, hernia type, mesh characteristics, surgery duration, hospital stay and immediate postoperative complications were collected and analysed. Results: A total of 2,690 OIHR and 158 LIHR cases were identified. The demographic profiles, hospital stay and complication rates were similar in both groups. However, surgical site infection was present exclusively in the OIHR group (3.55% versus 0.0%; P <0.05). The timeline for returning to normal activities was statistically shorter for the LIHR group (6 versus 8 days; P <0.05). The most frequent immediate complication in the LIHR group was subcutaneous emphysema (6.54% versus 0.0%; P <0.05). Recurrence (9.23% versus 3.61%; P = 0.09) and chronic pain (41.53% versus 13.55%; P <0.05) were higher in the LIHR group. Conclusion: Lower recurrence and chronic pain rates were observed with OIHR in the initial experience with LIHR in the hospital. However, LIHR had significant advantages concerning faster patient recovery and lower rates of surgical site infections. While the results contribute an interesting deviation from the standard narrative, they should be interpreted within the context of a learning curve associated with the early experience of the research team with LIHR.
Sujet(s)
Hernie inguinale , Herniorraphie , Laparoscopie , Courbe d'apprentissage , Durée du séjour , Humains , Hernie inguinale/chirurgie , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Laparoscopie/enseignement et éducation , Mâle , Études rétrospectives , Femelle , Herniorraphie/méthodes , Herniorraphie/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Inde , Adulte , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Résultat thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Douleur postopératoireRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To document the utilization and training of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques within the American, European, Australian and New Zealand Colleges of Small Animal Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS, ECVS, and ANZCVS) in 2020. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Diplomates and residents of the ACVS, ECVS, and FANZCVS. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent using veterinary list servers. Questions were organized into categories evaluating (1) the demographics of the study population and the caseload, (2) comfort level with specific procedures, (3) motivating factors and limitations, and (4) surgical training and the role of the governing bodies. RESULTS: Respondents included 111 practicing surgeons and 28 residents. Respondents' soft-tissue MIS caseloads had increased since they first started performing MIS; however, most respondents were only comfortable performing basic laparoscopy. Over half of the respondents agreed on the patient benefits and high standard of care provided by MIS. Perceived adequate soft-tissue training in MIS during residency was strongly associated with perceived proficiency at the time of survey response. Most respondents agreed that the specialty colleges should take a more active role in developing standards for soft-tissue MIS, with residents agreeing that a required standardized course would be beneficial. CONCLUSION: Soft-tissue MIS is widely performed by diplomates and residents. Perceived adequate soft-tissue MIS training was strongly associated with perceived proficiency. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: There is substantial underutilization of advanced MIS techniques in veterinary specialty surgical practice, which might be improved by a stronger focus on MIS training during residency.
Sujet(s)
Internat et résidence , Laparoscopie , Thoracoscopie , Thoracoscopie/médecine vétérinaire , Thoracoscopie/enseignement et éducation , Thoracoscopie/méthodes , Animaux , Laparoscopie/médecine vétérinaire , Laparoscopie/enseignement et éducation , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Australie , Chirurgie vétérinaire/enseignement et éducation , Nouvelle-Zélande , Enseignement vétérinaire , Vétérinaires/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Compétence cliniqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of benefits on postoperative outcomes, minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) had a very low diffusion up to 2014, and recent evolution is unknown. Our aim was to analyze the recent diffusion and adoption of MILS and compare the trends in indications, extent of resection, and institutional practice with open liver surgery (OLS). METHODS: We analyzed the French nationwide, exhaustive cohort of all patients undergoing a liver resection in France between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2022. Average annual percentage changes (AAPC) in the incidence of MILS and OLS were compared using mixed-effects log-linear regression models. Time trends were analyzed in terms of extent of resection, indication, and institutional practice. RESULTS: MILS represented 25.2% of 74,671 liver resections and year incidence doubled from 16.5% in 2013 to 35.4% in 2022. The highest AAPC were observed among major liver resections [+ 22.2% (19.5; 24.9) per year], primary [+ 10.2% (8.5; 12.0) per year], and secondary malignant tumors [+ 9.9% (8.2; 11.6) per year]. The highest increase in MILS was observed in university hospitals [+ 14.7% (7.7; 22.2) per year] performing 48.8% of MILS and in very high-volume (> 150 procedures/year) hospitals [+ 12.1% (9.0; 15.3) per year] performing 19.7% of MILS. OLS AAPC decreased for all indications and institutions and accelerated over time from - 1.8% (- 3.9; - 0.3) per year in 2013-2018 to - 5.9% (- 7.9; - 3.9) per year in 2018-2022 (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported trend reversal between MILS and OLS. MILS has considerably increased at a national scale, crossing the 20% tipping point of adoption rate as defined by the IDEAL framework.
Sujet(s)
Hépatectomie , Humains , France , Hépatectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Hépatectomie/tendances , Hépatectomie/méthodes , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs du foie/chirurgie , Sujet âgé , Interventions chirurgicales mini-invasives/statistiques et données numériques , Interventions chirurgicales mini-invasives/tendances , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Laparoscopie/tendances , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare outcomes and cost effectiveness of extra-corporeal anastomosis (ECA) versus intra-corporeal anastomosis (ICA) for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme data. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer from January 2018 to December 2022 were identified. Non-cancer diagnoses, emergency procedures or synchronous resection of other organs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, long-term survival and hospitalisation costs were compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (175 ECA, 48 ICA) were included in the analysis. Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline patient, comorbidity, and tumour characteristics. Distribution of pathological TMN stage, tumour largest dimension, total lymph node harvest and resection margin lengths were statistically similar. ICA was associated with a longer median operative duration compared with ECA (255 min vs. 220 min, P < 0.001). There was a quicker time to gastrointestinal recovery, with a shorter median hospital stay in the ICA group (4.0 versus 5.0 days, P = 0.001). Overall complication rates were comparable. ICA was associated with a higher surgical procedure cost (£6301.57 versus £4998.52, P < 0.001), but lower costs for ward accommodation (£1679.05 versus £2420.15, P = 0.001) and treatment (£3774.55 versus £4895.14, P = 0.009), with a 4.5% reduced overall cost compared with ECA. The ICER of -£3323.58 showed ICA to be more cost effective than ECA, across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: ICA in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is associated with quicker post-operative recovery and may be more cost effective compared with ECA, despite increased operative costs.
Sujet(s)
Anastomose chirurgicale , Colectomie , Tumeurs du côlon , Laparoscopie , Durée opératoire , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Anastomose chirurgicale/économie , Anastomose chirurgicale/méthodes , Colectomie/économie , Colectomie/méthodes , Tumeurs du côlon/chirurgie , Tumeurs du côlon/économie , Évaluation du Coût-Efficacité , Interventions chirurgicales non urgentes/économie , Interventions chirurgicales non urgentes/méthodes , Coûts hospitaliers/statistiques et données numériques , Laparoscopie/économie , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Durée du séjour/économie , Complications postopératoires/économie , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
While partial nephrectomy offers oncologic efficacy and preserves renal function for T1 renal tumors, renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) remains a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. This study compared RAP incidence across robotic-assisted (RAPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and open (OPN) partial nephrectomies in a large tertiary oncological center. This retrospective study analyzed 785 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy between 2012 and 2022 (398 RAPN, 122 LPN, 265 OPN). Data included demographics, tumor size/location, surgical type, clinical presentation, treatment, and post-operative outcomes. The primary outcome was RAP incidence, with secondary outcomes including presentation, treatment efficacy, and renal function. Seventeen patients (2.1%) developed RAP, presenting with massive hematuria (100%), hemorrhagic shock (5.8%), and clot retention (23%). The median onset was 12 days postoperatively. RAP occurred in 4 (1%), 4 (3.3%), and 9 (3.4%) patients following RAPN, LPN, and OPN, respectively (p = 0.04). Only operative length and surgical approach were independently associated with RAP. Selective embolization achieved immediate bleeding control in 94%, with one patient requiring a second embolization. No additional surgery or nephrectomy was needed. Estimated GFR at one year was similar across both groups (p = 0.53). RAPN demonstrated a significantly lower RAP incidence compared to LPN and OPN (p = 0.04). Emergency angiographic embolization proved effective, with no long-term renal function impact. This retrospective study lacked randomization and long-term follow-up. Further research with larger datasets and longer follow-ups is warranted. This study suggests that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is associated with a significantly lower risk of RAP compared to traditional approaches. Emergency embolization effectively treats RAP without compromising long-term renal function.
Sujet(s)
Faux anévrisme , Tumeurs du rein , Laparoscopie , Néphrectomie , Complications postopératoires , Artère rénale , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées , Humains , Néphrectomie/méthodes , Néphrectomie/effets indésirables , Faux anévrisme/chirurgie , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/méthodes , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/effets indésirables , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Études rétrospectives , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Sujet âgé , Artère rénale/chirurgie , Tumeurs du rein/chirurgie , Incidence , Résultat thérapeutique , Embolisation thérapeutique/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated trends in global surgical site infection rates in colorectal surgery in the past decade. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to describe changes in rates of different surgical site infections from 2013 to 2020, identify risk factors for surgical site infection occurrence, and evaluate the association of minimally invasive surgery and infection rates in colorectal resections. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2013-2020 identifying patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal resections by procedure codes was performed. Patient demographic information, comorbidities, procedures, and complications data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. SETTING: This was a retrospective study. PATIENTS: A total of 279,730 patients received colorectal resections from 2013 to 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the rate of surgical site infection, divided into superficial, deep incisional, and organ space infections. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in rates of superficial infections ( p < 0.01) and deep incisional infections ( p < 0.01) from 5.9% in 2013 to 3.3% in 2020 and from 1.4% in 2013 to 0.6% in 2020, respectively, but a rise in organ space infections ( p < 0.01) from 5.2% in 2013 to 7.1% in 2020. Minimally invasive techniques were associated with decreased odds of all surgical site infections compared to open techniques ( p < 0.01) in multivariate analysis, and adoption of minimally invasive techniques increased from 59% in 2013 to 66% in 2020. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by its retrospective nature and variables available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial and deep incisional infection rates have significantly decreased, likely secondary to improved adoption of minimally invasive techniques and infection prevention bundles. Organ space infection rates continue to increase. Additional research is warranted to clarify current recommendations for mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotic use as well as to study novel interventions to decrease postoperative infection occurrence. See Video Abstract . TENDENCIAS MODERNAS EN LAS TASAS DE INFECCIN DEL SITIO QUIRRGICO PARA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL UN ESTUDIO DEL PROYECTO NACIONAL DE MEJORA DE LA CALIDAD QUIRRGICA: ANTECEDENTES:Hay pocos estudios que investiguen las tendencias en las tasas globales de infección del sitio quirúrgico en cirugía colorrectal en la última década.OBJETIVO:Este estudio busca describir cambios en las tasas de diferentes infecciones del sitio quirúrgico entre 2013 y 2020, identificar factores de riesgo para la aparición de ISQ y evaluar la asociación de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva y las tasas de infección en resecciones colorrectales.DISEÑO:Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de la base de datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica 2013-2020 que identifica a los pacientes sometidos a resecciones colorrectales abiertas o laparoscópicas mediante códigos de procedimiento. Se obtuvo información demográfica de los pacientes, comorbilidades, procedimientos y datos de complicaciones. Se realizó regresión logística univariable y multivariable.AJUSTE:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo.PACIENTES:Un total de 279,730 pacientes recibieron resección colorrectal entre 2013 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La medida de resultado primaria fue la tasa de infección del sitio quirúrgico, dividida en infecciones superficiales, incisionales profundas y del espacio de órganos.RESULTADOS:Hubo una disminución significativa en las tasas de infecciones superficiales (p < 0,01) e infecciones incisionales profundas ( p < 0,01) del 5,9% en 2013 al 3,3% en 2020 y del 1,4% en 2013 al 0,6% en 2020, respectivamente. pero un aumento en las infecciones del espacio de los órganos ( p < 0,01) del 5,2 % en 2013 al 7,1 % en 2020. El uso de técnicas mínimamente invasivas se asoció con una disminución de las probabilidades de todas las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico en comparación con las técnicas abiertas ( p < 0,01) en el análisis multivariado y la adopción de técnicas mínimamente invasivas aumentó del 59% en 2013 al 66% en 2020.LIMITACIONES:El estudio está limitado por la naturaleza retrospectiva y las variables disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES:Las tasas de infección superficial y profunda han disminuido significativamente, probablemente debido a una mejor adopción de técnicas mínimamente invasivas y esquemas de prevención de infecciones. Las tasas de infección del espacio de los órganos continúan aumentando. Se justifica realizar investigaciones adicionales para aclarar las recomendaciones actuales para la preparación intestinal mecánica y el uso de antibióticos orales, así como para estudiar intervenciones novedosas para disminuir la aparición de infecciones posoperatorias. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).
Sujet(s)
Laparoscopie , Amélioration de la qualité , Infection de plaie opératoire , Humains , Infection de plaie opératoire/épidémiologie , Infection de plaie opératoire/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Laparoscopie/effets indésirables , Laparoscopie/tendances , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Facteurs de risque , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Chirurgie colorectale/effets indésirables , Chirurgie colorectale/tendances , Colectomie/effets indésirables , Colectomie/tendances , Colectomie/méthodes , Bases de données factuelles , AdulteRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted surgery has been increasingly adopted in colorectal cancer resection. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the inpatient outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in patients aged 75 years and older. DESIGN: A retrospective, population-based study. SETTINGS: This study analyzed data from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2018. PATIENTS: Patients with colorectal cancer aged 75 years and older and who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and total hospital costs were assessed. RESULTS: Data from 14,108 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, any postoperative complications (adjusted OR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99; p = 0.030) and prolonged length of stay (adjusted OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; p = 0.001) were significantly less in the robotic than the laparoscopic group. In addition, robotic surgery was associated with significantly higher total hospital costs (26.06 USD greater cost; 95% CI, 21.35-30.77 USD; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The analysis was limited by its retrospective and observational nature, potential coding errors, and the lack of intraoperative factors, such as operative time, laboratory measures, and information on surgeons' experience. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, in patients with colorectal cancer aged 75 years and older who were undergoing tumor resections, compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery is associated with better inpatient outcomes in terms of complication rate and risk of prolonged length of stay. This finding is especially true among patients with colon cancer. However, robotic surgery is associated with higher total hospital costs. See Video Abstract . RESULTADOS DE LA CIRUGA ASISTIDA POR ROBOT FRENTE A LA CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN ADULTOS AOS DE EDAD UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN DE LA MUESTRA NACIONAL DE PACIENTES HOSPITALIZADOS DE ESTADOS UNIDOS: ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía asistida por robot se ha adoptado cada vez más en la resección del cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los resultados hospitalarios de la resección del cáncer colorrectal asistida por robot versus la laparoscópica convencional en pacientes ≥ 75 años.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de base poblacional.AJUSTES:Este estudio analizó datos de la Muestra Nacional de Pacientes Hospitalizados de Estados Unidos de 2005 a 2018.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ≥ 75 años y sometidos a resección laparoscópica convencional o asistida por robot.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron las complicaciones posoperatorias, la duración prolongada de la estancia hospitalaria y los costos hospitalarios totales.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron datos de 14.108 pacientes. Después del ajuste, cualquier complicación posoperatoria (aOR = 0,87; IC del 95 %: 0,77-0,99, p = 0,030) y duración prolongada de la estancia hospitalaria (aOR = 0,78; IC del 95 %: 0,67-0,91, p = 0,001) fueron significativamente menores en el grupo robótico que el grupo laparoscópico. Además, la cirugía robótica se asoció con costos hospitalarios totales significativamente mayores ($26,06 USD mayor costo; IC 95%: 21,35-30,77 USD, p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES:El análisis estuvo limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva y observacional, posibles errores de codificación y la falta de factores intraoperatorios como el tiempo operatorio, medidas de laboratorio e información sobre la experiencia de los cirujanos.CONCLUSIONES:En Estados Unidos, los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ≥ 75 años que se sometieron a resecciones tumorales, en comparación con la cirugía laparoscópica convencional, la cirugía robótica se asocia con mejores resultados hospitalarios en términos de tasa de complicaciones y riesgo de estadía prolongada, especialmente entre pacientes con cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica se asocia a costes hospitalarios totales más elevados. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs colorectales , Laparoscopie , Durée du séjour , Complications postopératoires , Score de propension , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées , Humains , Sujet âgé , Mâle , Femelle , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Laparoscopie/économie , Laparoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/économie , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/méthodes , Interventions chirurgicales robotisées/statistiques et données numériques , Tumeurs colorectales/chirurgie , Études rétrospectives , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Coûts hospitaliers/statistiques et données numériques , Colectomie/méthodes , Colectomie/économie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Despite being a key metric with a significant correlation with the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer, the optimal surgical approach for total mesorectal excision (TME) has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the association of the surgical approach on the quality of TME and surgical margins and to characterize the surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open TME for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with primary, nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent either lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection via robotic (Rob), laparoscopic (Lap), or open approaches were selected from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2017). Quasi-Poisson regression analysis with backward selection was used to investigate the relationship between the surgical approach and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Among the 664 patients included in the study, the distribution of surgical approaches was as follows: 351 (52.9%) underwent TME via the open approach, 159 (23.9%) via the robotic approach, and 154 (23.2%) via the laparoscopic approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics among the three cohorts. The laparoscopic cohort had fewer patients with low rectal cancer (<6 cm from the anal verge) than the robotic and open cohorts (Lap 28.6% versus Rob 59.1% versus Open 45.6%, P = 0.015). Patients who underwent Rob and Lap TME had lower intraoperative blood loss compared with the Open approach (Rob 200 mL [Q1, Q3: 100.0, 300.0] versus Lap 150 mL [Q1, Q3: 75.0, 250.0] versus Open 300 mL [Q1, Q3: 150.0, 600.0], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the operative time (Rob 243 min [Q1, Q3: 203.8, 300.2] versus Lap 241 min [Q1, Q3: 186, 336] versus Open 226 min [Q1, Q3: 178, 315.8], P = 0.309) between the three approaches. Postoperative length of stay was shorter with robotic and laparoscopic approach compared to open approach (Rob 5.0 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8.2] versus Lap 5 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8] versus Open 7.0 d [Q1, Q3: 5, 9], P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches (79.2%, 64.9%, and 64.7%, respectively; P = 0.46). The margin positivity rate, a composite of circumferential margin and distal margin, was higher with the robotic and open approaches than with the laparoscopic approach (Rob 8.2% versus Open 6.6% versus Lap 1.9%, P = 0.17), Rob versus Lap (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.83) and Rob versus Open (odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.22, 1.12). There was no difference in long-term survival, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, between patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, or open TME (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer, we did not observe a difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, or open approaches. Robotic and open TME compared to laparoscopic TME were associated with higher margin positivity rates in our study. This was likely due to the higher percentage of low rectal cancers in the robotic and open cohorts. We also reported no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the aforementioned surgical techniques.