Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 27.599
Filtrer
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15295, 2024 07 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961171

RÉSUMÉ

Palatal injections are considered to be one of the most painful dental procedures. As a result, it was important to find alternatives to this painful injection to improve children's cooperation. The dental literature mentioned using EMLA cream as a possible alternative to conventional injections, but its anesthetic effect was debated. Therefore, it was valuable to research the impact of microneedle patches to enhance the effectiveness of this cream. The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of different methods of anesthesia and pain levels in children aged 7-11 years. The study compared the use of EMLA cream, EMLA with microneedles, and conventional palatal injections. A total of 90 children were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 received conventional palatal anesthesia (control), Group 2 received EMLA cream only, and Group 3 received EMLA with microneedles. Pain levels were assessed using the FLACC and Wong-Baker scales at three different time points: T1(during anesthesia), T2(on palatal probing), and T3(during extraction). The FLACC scale revealed a significant difference in pain between groups only at T1 (P value = 0.000). It was found that the conventional palatal injection group had a higher pain level than the EMLA cream-only group and the group using microneedle patches with EMLA cream (P value = 0.000). However, the other groups did not show significant differences in pain levels during the anesthesia (P value = 1.00). Similarly, the Wong-Baker scale also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in pain between groups only at T1 (P value = 0.000). It was found that the conventional palatal injection group had a higher pain level than the EMLA cream-only group and the group using microneedle patches with EMLA cream (P value = 0.000). However, the other groups did not show significant differences in pain levels during the anesthesia (P value = 0.091). The study concludes that both EMLA cream alone and EMLA with microneedles can be used as an alternative to conventional palatal anesthesia for children.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Association de lidocaïne et de prilocaïne , Aiguilles , Palais , Humains , Enfant , Association de lidocaïne et de prilocaïne/administration et posologie , Femelle , Mâle , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Mesure de la douleur , Anesthésie dentaire/méthodes , Anesthésie dentaire/instrumentation , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie
2.
AAPS J ; 26(4): 76, 2024 Jul 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955873

RÉSUMÉ

The selection of skin is crucial for the in vitro permeation test (IVPT). The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of different freezing-thawing processes on the barrier function of skin and the transdermal permeability of granisetron and lidocaine. Rat and hairless mouse skins were thawed at three different conditions after being frozen at -20℃ for 9 days: thawed at 4℃, room temperature (RT), and 32℃. There were no significant differences in the steady-state fluxes of drugs between fresh and thawed samples, but compared with fresh skin there were significant differences in lag time for the permeation of granisetron in rat skins thawed at RT and 32℃. Histological research and scanning electron microscopy images showed no obvious structural damage on frozen/thawed skin, while immunohistochemical staining and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the tight junction (TJ) protein Cldn-1 showed significantly impaired epidermal barrier. It was concluded that the freezing-thawing process increases the diffusion rate of hydrophilic drugs partly due to the functional degradation of TJs. It's recommended that hairless, inbred strains and identical animal donors should be used, and the selected thawing method of skin should be validated prior to IVPT, especially for hydrophilic drugs.


Sujet(s)
Congélation , Souris hairless , Perméabilité , Absorption cutanée , Peau , Animaux , Peau/métabolisme , Souris , Absorption cutanée/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Rats , Mâle , Administration par voie cutanée , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/pharmacocinétique , Rat Sprague-Dawley
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 216, 2024 Jul 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956472

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Tracheal tube cuff pressure will increase after pneumoperitoneum when the cuff is inflated with air, high pressure can cause tracheal mucosal damage. This prospective trial aimed to assess if inflating with normal saline or lidocaine can prevent increase of tracheal tube cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal damage in laparoscopic surgeries with general anesthesia. Whether changes of tracheal tube cuff transverse diameter (CD) can predict changes of tracheal tube cuff pressure. METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for laparoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasms under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to groups air (A), saline (S) or lidocaine (L). Endotracheal tube cuff was inflated with room-temperature air in group A (n = 30), normal saline in group S (n = 30), 2% lidocaine hydrochloride injection in group L (n = 30). After intubation, tracheal tube cuff pressure was monitored by a calibrated pressure transducers, cuff pressure was adjusted to 25 cmH2O (T0.5). Tracheal tube cuff pressure at 15 min after pneumoperitoneum (T1) and 15 min after exsufflation (T2) were accessed. CD were measured by ultrasound at T0.5 and T1, the ability of ΔCD (T1-0.5) to predict cuff pressure was accessed. Tracheal mucous injury at the end of surgery were also recorded. RESULTS: Tracheal tube cuff pressure had no significant difference among the three groups at T1 and T2. ΔCD had prediction value (AUC: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.81-1.02]; sensitivity: 0.99; specificity: 0.82) for cuff pressure. Tracheal mucous injury at the end of surgery were 0 (0, 1.0) in group A, 0 (0, 1.0) in group S, 0 (0, 0) in group L (p = 0.02, group L was lower than group A and S, p = 0.03 and p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to inflation with air, normal saline and 2% lidocaine cannot ameliorate the increase of tracheal tube cuff pressure during the pneumoperitoneum period under general anesthesia, but lidocaine can decrease postoperative tracheal mucosa injury. ΔCD measured by ultrasound is a predictor for changes of tracheal tube cuff pressure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2100054089, Date: 08/12/2021.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs colorectales , Intubation trachéale , Laparoscopie , Lidocaïne , Pression , Solution physiologique salée , Humains , Tumeurs colorectales/chirurgie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Intubation trachéale/méthodes , Intubation trachéale/instrumentation , Femelle , Laparoscopie/méthodes , Études prospectives , Solution physiologique salée/administration et posologie , Air , Sujet âgé , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Anesthésie générale/méthodes , Adulte , Pneumopéritoine artificiel/méthodes
4.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ; 42(2): 126-133, 2024 Apr 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957910

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Both precooling the site and injecting a warm anesthetic solution have proven to be efficient in reducing pain individually. However, there is insufficient data on evaluating the efficiency of precooling the site of injection along with the simultaneous administration of a warm local anesthetic solution on the same site in a single patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy, pain perception, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects of a warm local anesthetic solution injected on precooled injection sites using 2% lignocaine with the conventional local anesthetic technique during inferior alveolar nerve block in 7-9-year-old children. METHODS: A split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 70 children who received 2% lignocaine with either technique A or B during the first or second appointment of the treatment procedure. The pain perception, anesthetic efficacy, pulse rate, oxygen saturation levels, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Pain during injection and treatment after administration of the warm local anesthesia (LA) technique was less as compared to the conventional block technique. Anesthetic success was observed with a faster onset of action (212.57 ± 32.51 s) and shorter duration of LA (165.16 ± 33.09 min) in the warm local technique as compared to the conventional technique. No significant differences were found with regard to heart rate and oxygen saturation levels between the two techniques. Administrating warm LA solutions at precooled injection sites revealed fewer adverse events. CONCLUSION: Injecting warm LA solution on precooled injection sites causes less discomfort and anxiety in children, which makes it more suitable for the child as well as the pediatric dentist.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésie dentaire , Anesthésiques locaux , Études croisées , Lidocaïne , Humains , Enfant , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Méthode en double aveugle , Anesthésie dentaire/méthodes , Femelle , Mâle , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Anesthésie locale/méthodes , Injections , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Mesure de la douleur , Température élevée , Perception de la douleur , Nerf mandibulaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques
5.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ; 42(2): 134-140, 2024 Apr 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957911

RÉSUMÉ

CONTEXT: For successfully managing pediatric dental patients, local anesthesia is essential to eliminate pain during or after the operative period. An early recovery from soft-tissue anesthesia after an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) should benefit a young child patient by avoiding the risk of inadvertently biting the soft tissues. AIMS: Hence, the purpose of the study was to (1) evaluate and compare the efficacy of pre- and postoperative ibuprofen on pain perception in children who undergo IANB anesthesia with or without the use of PM and (2) evaluate the average time required for reversal of anesthesia symptoms using phentolamine mesylate. METHODS: The present study was a randomized, clinical trial performed among 60 children between 6 and 8 years of age using a convenient sampling method. The children were randomly assigned into four equal groups of 15 each using the computer-generated randomization sequence. IANB anesthesia was performed using 2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and a mandibular primary molar pulpotomy was performed on each group. Group 1: the ibuprofen tablet was taken 1 h before the onset of the procedure. Group 2: ibuprofen tablet 30 min after the pulpotomy procedure. Group 3: the ibuprofen tablet was taken 1 h before the onset of the procedure, and the Phentolamine mesylate (PM) injection was administered. Group 4: immediately after the pulpotomy, the PM injection was administered, and an ibuprofen tablet was taken 30 min after the pulpotomy procedure. All children were assessed for the duration of soft-tissue anesthesia, their behavior scores and pain rating, as well as the incidence of postoperative self-inflicted injuries. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the average time needed for the reversal of anesthetic symptoms between groups. The effects of phentolamine, local anesthetics, and ibuprofen on the child's behavior and pain scores were compared using the Student's t-test. For the study, P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. RESULTS: The time needed for the full reversal of anesthetic symptoms to manifest on the tongue and lip was substantially reduced by the injection of phentolamine (P < 0.001). The use of phentolamine for reversal or the intake of ibuprofen pre- or postoperatively did not exhibit any significant variation in the behavior, pain experience, or incidence of self-inflicted injuries in the child. CONCLUSION: It is evident that although phentolamine injections shorten the duration of anesthesia, the adjunctive use of pre- or postoperative ibuprofen did not significantly alter pain scores.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésie dentaire , Anesthésiques locaux , Ibuprofène , Nerf mandibulaire , Bloc nerveux , Phentolamine , Humains , Phentolamine/pharmacologie , Enfant , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Anesthésie dentaire/méthodes , Femelle , Mâle , Nerf mandibulaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Anesthésiques locaux/pharmacologie , Perception de la douleur/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Douleur postopératoire/prévention et contrôle , Pulpotomie/méthodes , Lidocaïne/pharmacologie , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Analgésiques non narcotiques/usage thérapeutique , Analgésiques non narcotiques/pharmacologie , Mesure de la douleur
6.
Psychopharmacol Bull ; 54(3): 73-96, 2024 Jul 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38993659

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Chronic pain remains a serious health problem with significant impact on morbidity and well-being. Available treatments have only resulted in relatively modest efficacy. Thus, novel therapeutic treatments with different mechanisms have recently generated empirical interest. Lidocaine is postulated to provide anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effect through its action at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and voltage gated calcium receptors. Emerging research indicates that lidocaine could be a reasonable alternative for treating chronic pain. Objective: Considering the evidence surrounding lidocaine's potential as a therapeutic modality for chronic pain, we conducted a narrative review on the evidence of lidocaine's therapeutic effects in chronic pain. Methods: A review of the PubMed, and Google scholar databases was undertaken in May 2022 to identify completed studies that investigated the effectiveness of lidocaine in the treatment of chronic pain from database inception to June 2022. Results: A total of 25 studies were included in the narrative review. Findings on available studies suggest that intravenous infusion of lidocaine is an emerging and promising option that may alleviate pain in some clinical populations. Our narrative synthesis showed that evidence for intravenous lidocaine is currently mixed for a variety of chronic pain syndromes. Findings indicate that evidence for efficacy is limited for: CRPS, and cancer pain. However, there is good evidence supporting the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine as augmentation in chronic post-surgical pain. Conclusion: Lidocaine may be a promising pharmacologic solution for chronic pain. Future investigation is warranted on elucidating the neurobiological mechanisms of lidocaine in attenuating pain signaling pathways.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Douleur chronique , Lidocaïne , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Humains , Douleur chronique/traitement médicamenteux , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/pharmacologie , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Anesthésiques locaux/pharmacologie , Perfusions veineuses
7.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 2883-2890, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39006188

RÉSUMÉ

Background and Importance: Postoperative cough is a common complication of general anesthesia after bronchoscopy. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety profile and efficacy of piriform recess instillation with lidocaine in reducing the incidence of coughing. Objective: To what extent could piriform recess instillation with lidocaine decrease the incidence of cough at 10min after extubation? Outcome Measures and Analysis: Eighty-eight consecutive patients were equally randomized to a lidocaine group receiving piriform recess instillation with 2mL 2% lidocaine, and a normal saline group receiving piriform recess instillation with 2mL saline. The primary outcome was the incidence of cough after extubation, and the secondary outcomes were throat score at 10 min and 6 h after extubation assessed by the numerical rating scale, cough severity at 10 min and 6 h after extubation assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 24 h 40-item Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-40), and subject-rated satisfaction score on a VAS. Main Results: Compared with saline group, the incidence of cough in lidocaine group was significantly lower (63.6% vs 86.4%, P=0.014). The sore throat score at 10 min after extubation was significantly lower (0[0,0] vs 1[0,2], P<0.001). The subject-rated overall anesthesia satisfaction score was significantly higher (84.8[±6.2] vs 76.6[±8.6], P<0.001). The severity of cough at 10 min after extubation was significantly lower (Mild: 36.4% vs 11.4%, P=0.006; Severe: 9.1% vs 43.2%, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the sore throat score at 6 h after extubation, severity of cough at 6 h after extubation, or QoR-40 at 24 h after extubation between the two groups. Conclusion: Piriform recess instillation with lidocaine before bronchoscopy is a simple and effective method for reducing early cough intensity and alleviating early sore throat. At 6 hours, there were no differences observed between the groups. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR2200067087).


Sujet(s)
Anesthésie générale , Bronchoscopie , Toux , Lidocaïne , Humains , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Toux/prévention et contrôle , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Anesthésie générale/effets indésirables , Adulte , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Sujet âgé , Instillation de médicaments , Méthode en double aveugle
8.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 438, 2024 Jul 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003452

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: This study examined the efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia compared with traditional blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting by evaluating the early postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A total of 119 patients who underwent isolated conventional coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled and divided into two groups (del Nido cardioplegia group [n = 36] and blood cardioplegia group [n = 50]) based on the type of cardioplegia used. This study compared the preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and early postoperative outcomes. Further subgroup analyses were conducted for high-risk patient groups. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were not significantly different between groups. The del Nido cardioplegia group exhibited advantageous myocardial protection outcomes, demonstrated by a significantly smaller rise in Troponin I levels post-surgery (2.8 [-0.4; 4.2] vs. 4.5 [2.9; 7.4] ng/mL, p = 0.004) and fewer defibrillation attempts during weaning off of cardiopulmonary bypass (0.0 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 1.1 times, p = 0.011) when compared to the blood cardioplegia group. Additionally, the del Nido group achieved a reduction in surgery duration, as evidenced by the reduced aortic cross-clamping time (64.0 [55.5; 75.5] vs. 77.5 [65.0; 91.0] min, p = 0.001) and total operative time (287.5 [270.0; 305.0] vs. 315.0 [285.0; 365.0] min, p = 0.008). Subgroup analyses consistently demonstrated that the del Nido cardioplegia group had a significantly smaller postoperative increase in Troponin I levels across all subgroups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: del Nido cardioplegia provided myocardial protection and favorable early postoperative outcomes compared to blood cardioplegia, making it a viable option for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Establishing a consensus on the protocol for Del Nido cardioplegia administration in adult surgeries is needed.


Sujet(s)
Solutions cardioplégiques , Pontage aortocoronarien , Arrêt cardiaque provoqué , Humains , Arrêt cardiaque provoqué/méthodes , Pontage aortocoronarien/méthodes , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutique , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Maladie des artères coronaires/chirurgie , Troponine I/sang , Chlorure de potassium , Mannitol , Lidocaïne , Solutions , Électrolytes , Sulfate de magnésium , Hydrogénocarbonate de sodium
9.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv40246, 2024 Jun 25.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916180

RÉSUMÉ

This retrospective study investigates the efficacy of 2 treatment regimens, pregabalin alone versus pregabalin combined with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine cream, in reducing itch in patients with brachioradial pruritus at a tertiary care center. Electronic medical records of 64 brachioradial pruritus patients seen at the University of Miami Itch Center were analyzed. A significant reduction in itch scores was seen with both treatments, with no significant difference between the groups. A small number of patients experienced adverse effects, including drowsiness and weight gain with pregabalin and skin irritation with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine cream. Ultimately, our findings underscore the potential of utilizing combined therapy for difficult-to-treat brachioradial pruritus cases and implementing individualized approaches for managing neuropathic pruritus. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to establish optimal treatment protocols.


Sujet(s)
Amitriptyline , Association de médicaments , Kétamine , Lidocaïne , Prégabaline , Prurit , Centres de soins tertiaires , Humains , Études rétrospectives , Prurit/traitement médicamenteux , Prurit/étiologie , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Résultat thérapeutique , Amitriptyline/usage thérapeutique , Amitriptyline/effets indésirables , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/usage thérapeutique , Kétamine/usage thérapeutique , Kétamine/effets indésirables , Kétamine/administration et posologie , Prégabaline/usage thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Antiprurigineux/usage thérapeutique , Antiprurigineux/effets indésirables , Floride , Crème pour la peau , Administration par voie cutanée , Dossiers médicaux électroniques
10.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e944116, 2024 Jun 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822518

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is the predominant invasive procedure for Crohn disease (CD) patients. Opioids and propofol carry risks of respiratory and cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to evaluate whether substituting fentanyl with ketamine or lidocaine could diminish propofol usage and minimize adverse events. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 146 patients with CD scheduled for elective colonoscopy were assigned to anesthesia with fentanyl (n=47), ketamine (n=47), or lidocaine (n=55). Propofol was administered to achieve sufficient anesthesia. Measured outcomes in each group included propofol consumption, hypotension and desaturation incidents, adverse event types, consciousness recovery time, abdominal pain intensity, Aldrete scale, and Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS). RESULTS Patients administered fentanyl needed significantly more propofol (P=0.017) than those on ketamine, with lidocaine showing no notable difference (P=0.28). Desaturation was significantly less common in the ketamine and lidocaine groups than fentanyl group (P<0.001). The ketamine group experienced milder reductions in mean arterial (P=0.018) and systolic blood pressure (P<0.001). Recovery metrics (Aldrete and PADSS scores) were lower for fentanyl (P<0.001), although satisfaction and pain levels were consistent across all groups (P=0.797). Dizziness occurred less frequently with lidocaine than fentanyl (17.2%, P=0.018) and ketamine (15.1%, P=0.019), while metallic taste incidents were more prevalent in the lidocaine group (13.5%, P=0.04) than fentanyl group. CONCLUSIONS Using ketamine or lidocaine instead of fentanyl in anesthesia for colonoscopy in patients with CD significantly lowers propofol use, reduces desaturation events, maintains blood pressure more effectively, without increasing hypotension risk, and accelerates recovery, without negatively impacting adverse events or patient satisfaction.


Sujet(s)
Coloscopie , Maladie de Crohn , Fentanyl , Kétamine , Lidocaïne , Propofol , Humains , Kétamine/effets indésirables , Kétamine/administration et posologie , Fentanyl/effets indésirables , Fentanyl/administration et posologie , Propofol/effets indésirables , Propofol/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/effets indésirables , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Mâle , Femelle , Coloscopie/méthodes , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Anesthésiques intraveineux/effets indésirables , Anesthésiques intraveineux/administration et posologie , Anesthésie/méthodes , Anesthésie/effets indésirables
11.
Hosp Pediatr ; 14(7): 541-547, 2024 Jul 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38860308

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy (as measured by time to resolution of pain) and safety of valproate infusion and lidocaine infusion in the treatment of pediatric status migrainosus. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study from March 2014 to June 2021 evaluating children and adolescents who received a lidocaine or sodium valproate infusion for the treatment of status migrainosus. During the study period, lidocaine infusion was exclusively used before March 2016, whereas sodium valproate infusion was exclusively used afterward. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients received lidocaine and 63 received sodium valproate infusion. Patients in the lidocaine group achieved significantly faster control of pain with median hours to pain free of 11.7 (interquartile range, 3.8-32.3) hours compared with 43.4 (interquartile range 13.8-68.7) hours in the valproate group (P = .002). At discharge, 21 of 31 (67.7%) of patients receiving lidocaine were pain-free compared with 26 of 59 (44.1%) of patients receiving valproate (P = .03). There were significantly more infusion interruptions of valproate compared with lidocaine for various patient-related factors (16/63, 25.4% vs 1/31, 3.2%; P = .009). More adverse effects were observed with valproate (42/63, 67%) compared with lidocaine (1/31, 3.2%; P < .001). The significant difference in hours to pain control persisted after adjustment for sex, race, age, BMI, presence of comorbidities, and pain score at admission. All patients in both groups completed the infusions and were discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine infusion is associated with superior pain control and a better safety profile compared with intravenous sodium valproate infusion in status migrainosus.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Lidocaïne , Acide valproïque , Humains , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Acide valproïque/administration et posologie , Acide valproïque/usage thérapeutique , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Mâle , Perfusions veineuses , Enfant , Adolescent , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Migraines/traitement médicamenteux , Résultat thérapeutique
12.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(6)2024 Jun 19.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929619

RÉSUMÉ

Background and Objectives: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) manifests as pain and sensorimotor disturbances in the upper extremities, often resulting from nerve root compression due to intervertebral disc herniation, degenerative changes, or trauma. While conservative treatments are initially preferred, persistent or severe cases may require surgical intervention. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block (SNRB) has emerged as a promising intervention for alleviating symptoms and potentially obviating the need for surgery. This study evaluates the therapeutic efficacy of ultrasound-guided SNRB in managing chronic CR, aiming to determine its potential in symptom relief and delaying or avoiding surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 720 outpatients treated for CR between October 2019 and March 2022. After excluding patients with traumatic CR, previous surgeries, malignancies, progressive neurological symptoms requiring immediate surgery, or inadequate conservative treatment, 92 patients who had experienced cervical radicular pain for more than three months and had failed to improve after more than six weeks of conservative treatment with VAS scores ≥ 5 were included. The patients underwent single or multiple ultrasound-guided SNRB procedures, involving the injection of dexamethasone and lidocaine under real-time ultrasound guidance. Symptom severity was assessed at the baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-procedure using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The data collected included age, sex, presence of neck and/or radicular pain, physical examination findings, recurrence of symptoms, improvement in symptoms, and whether surgical intervention was ultimately required. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with symptom improvement or recurrence. Results: Significant symptom improvement was observed in 69 (75.0%) participants post-SNRB, with 55 (79.7%) showing improvement at 4 weeks, 11 (15.9%) at 8 weeks, and 3 (4.4%) at 12 weeks. Symptom recurrence, defined by an increase in VAS score accompanied by a pain flare lasting at least 24 h after a pain-free interval of at least one month, was noted in 48 (52.2%) patients. The presence of combined neck and radicular pain was a significant predictor of recurrence (p = 0.008). No significant associations were found between symptom relief and factors such as age, gender, initial pain severity, or MRI findings. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided SNRB effectively manages chronic CR, providing substantial symptom relief and potentially reducing the need for surgical intervention. This technique offers a promising conservative treatment option, especially given its real-time visualization advantages and minimal radiation exposure.


Sujet(s)
Bloc nerveux , Radiculopathie , Échographie interventionnelle , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Radiculopathie/traitement médicamenteux , Études rétrospectives , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Échographie interventionnelle/méthodes , Adulte , Résultat thérapeutique , Mesure de la douleur/méthodes , Sujet âgé , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/usage thérapeutique , Maladie chronique , Dexaméthasone/administration et posologie , Dexaméthasone/usage thérapeutique
13.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 356, 2024 Jun 22.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909234

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Systematic evaluation of the safety of del Nido cardioplegia compared to cold blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (published by 14 January 2024) comparing del Nido cardioplegia to cold blood cardioplegia in adult. Our main endpoints were myocardial injury markers and clinical outcomes. We assessed pooled data by use of a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were identified, incorporating 889 patients who received del Nido cardioplegia and 907 patients who received cold blood cardioplegia. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the cold blood cardioplegia, the del Nido cardioplegia had less volume of cardioplegia, higher rate of spontaneous rhythm recovery after cross clamp release, lower levels of postoperative cardiac troponin T and creatinine kinase-myocardial band, all of which were statistically significant. However, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative troponin I and postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. The clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit stay time, hospital stay time, postoperative stroke, postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation, postoperative heart failure requiring intra-aortic balloon pump mechanical circulation support, and in-hospital mortality of both are comparable. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests that del Nido cardioplegia reduced volume of cardioplegia administration and attempts of defibrillation. The superior postoperative results in CTnT and CK-MB may provide a direction for further research on improvement of the composition of cardioplegia.


Sujet(s)
Procédures de chirurgie cardiaque , Solutions cardioplégiques , Arrêt cardiaque provoqué , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Humains , Arrêt cardiaque provoqué/méthodes , Procédures de chirurgie cardiaque/méthodes , Solutions cardioplégiques/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Chlorure de potassium , Mannitol , Lidocaïne , Solutions , Électrolytes , Sulfate de magnésium , Hydrogénocarbonate de sodium
14.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 439, 2024 Jun 24.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914976

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Perineal lacerations are a very common complication of post-partum. Usually, the repair of 1st and 2nd-grade lacerations is performed after the administration of local anesthesia. Despite the great relevance of the problem, there are only a few studies about the best choice of local anesthetic to use during suturing. We performed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of a local anesthetic spray during the suturing of perineal lacerations in the post-partum. METHODS: We compared the spray with the standard technique, which involves the infiltration of lacerated tissues, using the NRS scale. 136 eligible women who had given birth at University Hospital of Udine were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive nebulization of Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray (experimental group) or subcutaneous/submucosal infiltration of mepivacaine hydrochloride (control group) during suturing of perineal laceration. RESULTS: The lacerations included 84 1st-grade perineal traumas (61.7%) and 52 2nd-grade perineal traumas (38.2%). All the procedures were successfully completed without severe complications or serious adverse reactions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood losses or total procedure time. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of NRS to none of the intervals considered. Regarding the application of the spray in the B group, in 36 cases (52.9%) it was necessary to improve the number of puffs previously supposed to be sufficient (5 puffs). Just in 3 cases, an additional injection was necessary (4.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that lidocaine spray alone can be used as a first line of local anesthetic during the closure of I-II-grade perineal lacerations, as it has comparable efficacy to mepivacaine infiltration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was recorded on https://clinicaltrials.gov . Identification number: NCT05201313. First registration date: 21/01/2022. Unique Protocol ID: 0042698/P/GEN/ARCS.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Lacérations , Lidocaïne , Mépivacaïne , Périnée , Techniques de suture , Humains , Femelle , Périnée/traumatismes , Périnée/chirurgie , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lacérations/chirurgie , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Adulte , Mépivacaïne/administration et posologie , Grossesse , Résultat thérapeutique
15.
Indian J Dent Res ; 35(1): 40-44, 2024 Jan 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934747

RÉSUMÉ

AIMS: Compare the efficacy of 2% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) and 4% articaine with adrenaline (1:100,000) in inferior alveolar nerve block prior to extraction of bilateral teeth posterior to canine in interval of one week. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Thirty-five patients were selected for the study. Patients were divided into two different groups: Group 1 - (2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000)) and Group 2 - (4% articaine with adrenaline (1:100,000)) solution. The study variables for each anaesthetic agent were: onset of action and depth of anaesthesia. A pulp tester was used to demonstrate quantitative values and a visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for qualitative evaluation of the two anaesthetic drugs in 2 min cycle for 10 min with respect to test canine. Anaesthesia was considered successful when pulp tester value 64 was achieved in 10 min for both the anaesthetic agent. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The difference in the efficacy of lignocaine and articaine was analysed using Student's t test. Within group comparison of the response to the pulp vitality test and VAS over various time periods was analysed using repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Bonferroni test. RESULTS: Data analysis showed statistical differences in onset and depth of anaesthesia between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 4% Articaine with adrenaline (1:100,000) onset of action is faster and depth of anaesthesia is better compared to 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000). Many previous studies reported onset of anaesthesia, but this study evaluates onset and depth of both the anaesthetic agent quantitatively and qualitatively.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésie dentaire , Anesthésiques locaux , Articaïne , Épinéphrine , Lidocaïne , Nerf mandibulaire , Bloc nerveux , Humains , Articaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/pharmacologie , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Nerf mandibulaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Épinéphrine/administration et posologie , Adulte , Anesthésie dentaire/méthodes , Jeune adulte , Mâle , Test pulpaire , Pulpe dentaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Mesure de la douleur , Femelle , Extraction dentaire , Vasoconstricteurs/administration et posologie , Adolescent , Canine , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique
16.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 90(6): 561-572, 2024 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869266

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: The full extent of intravenous lidocaine's effectiveness in alleviating postoperative pain and enhancing gastrointestinal function recovery remains uncertain. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted an exhaustive search of databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared intravenous lidocaine infusion's efficacy to that of a placebo or routine care in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. The primary outcome measure was resting pain scores 24 h postoperatively. We utilized a random-effects model based on the intention-to-treat principle for the overall results. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: This study included twenty-four trials with 1533 patients. Intravenous lidocaine significantly reduced resting pain scores 24 h after gastrointestinal surgery (twenty trials, SMD -0.67, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.24, P=0.002, I2 = 90%). This finding was consistent in subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. The benefit was also observed at other resting and moving time points (1, 2, 4, and 12 h) postoperatively. Intravenous lidocaine significantly decreased opioid consumption within 24 h after surgery (eleven trials, SMD: -1.19; 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.39; P=0.003). Intravenous lidocaine also shortened the time to bowel sound (MD: -8.51; 95% CI: -14.59 to -2.44; P=0.006), time to first flatus (MD: -6.00; 95% CI: -9.87 to -2.13; P=0.002), and time to first defecation (MD: -9.77; 95% CI: -17.19 to -2.36; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative intravenous lidocaine can alleviate acute pain and expedite gastrointestinal function recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to substantial heterogeneity. Further large-scale studies are necessary to validate these findings.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Procédures de chirurgie digestive , Lidocaïne , Douleur postopératoire , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/usage thérapeutique , Humains , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur postopératoire/prévention et contrôle , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Anesthésiques locaux/usage thérapeutique , Récupération fonctionnelle/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Perfusions veineuses , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet
17.
Int J Pharm ; 660: 124377, 2024 Jul 20.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914351

RÉSUMÉ

Lidocaine is generally recognized and preferred for local anaesthesia, but in addition, studies have described additional benefits of lidocaine in cancer therapy, inflammation reduction, and wound healing. These properties contribute to its increasing importance in dermatological applications, and not only in pain relief but also in other potential therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to enhance lidocaine delivery through the skin. A stable nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC), as a passive permeation enhancer, was developed using a 23 full factorial design. The nanosystems were characterized by crystallinity behaviour, particle size, zeta potential, encapsulation efficiency measurements, and one of them was selected for further investigation. Then, NLC gel was formulated for dermal application and compared to a traditional dermal ointment in terms of physicochemical (rheological behaviour) and biopharmaceutical (qualitative Franz diffusion and quantitative Raman investigations) properties. The study also examined the use of 3D printed solid microneedles as active permeation enhancers for these systems, offering a minimally invasive approach to enhance transdermal drug delivery. By actively facilitating drug permeation through the skin, microneedles can complement the passive transport achieved by NLCs, thereby providing an innovative and synergistic approach to improving lidocaine delivery.


Sujet(s)
Administration par voie cutanée , Anesthésiques locaux , Lidocaïne , Perméabilité , Absorption cutanée , Peau , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/pharmacocinétique , Lidocaïne/composition chimique , Absorption cutanée/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Anesthésiques locaux/pharmacocinétique , Anesthésiques locaux/composition chimique , Animaux , Peau/métabolisme , Lipides/composition chimique , Vecteurs de médicaments/composition chimique , Systèmes de délivrance de médicaments/méthodes , Nanostructures/composition chimique , Nanostructures/administration et posologie , Suidae , Aiguilles , Taille de particule , Gels
18.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 135(2): 210-216, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898535

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The local anaesthetic lidocaine is widely used in the neonatal intensive unit to treat seizures in premature babies. However, other antiepileptics administered during early development in various animal models have shown negative long-term behavioural effects. Since no long-term behavioural data so far exist regarding lidocaine exposure at an early age, we decided to perform this extended follow-up study using a sensitive behavioural test. METHODS: Neonatal mice received a subcutaneous administration of saline or one dose of lidocaine (0.5, 4, or 12 mg kg-1) on postnatal day 10 (P10; peak of the Brain Growth Spurt). A well-established test to detect long-term behavioural alterations was conducted at 2 and 6 months of age, corresponding to early and late adulthood in humans. RESULTS: All animal survived to later testing. No signs of acute toxicity were observed. Lidocaine exposure did not result in any negative behavioural effects during habituation to a new home environment at any of the two studied time points, compared to saline placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine does not by itself produce any negative long-term behavioural effects in mice exposed in early life (P10) despite long-term follow-up. This is reassuring regarding the current practice of treating seizures in premature babies with intravenous lidocaine.


Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Animaux nouveau-nés , Comportement animal , Lidocaïne , Animaux , Lidocaïne/toxicité , Lidocaïne/pharmacologie , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Souris , Comportement animal/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Anesthésiques locaux/toxicité , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Mâle , Femelle , Crises épileptiques/induit chimiquement , Relation dose-effet des médicaments
19.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 375, 2024 Jun 26.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918868

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: An optimal pharmacological strategy for fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of an FTCA program using methadone and non-opioid adjuvant infusions (magnesium, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted across private and public teaching sectors. We studied patients managed by a fast-track protocol or via usual care according to clinician preference. The primary outcome was the total mechanical ventilation time in hours adjusted for hospital, body mass index, category of surgical urgency, cardiopulmonary bypass time and EuroSCORE II. Secondary outcomes included successful extubation within four postoperative hours, postoperative pain scores, postoperative opioid requirements, and the development of postoperative complications. RESULTS: We included 87 patients in the fast-track group and 88 patients in the usual care group. Fast-track patients had a 35% reduction in total ventilation hours compared with usual care patients (p = 0.007). Thirty-five (40.2%) fast-track patients were extubated within four hours compared to 10 (11.4%) usual-care patients (odds ratio: 5.2 [95% CI: 2.39-11.08; p < 0.001]). Over 24 h, fast-track patients had less severe pain (p < 0.001) and required less intravenous morphine equivalent (22.00 mg [15.75:32.50] vs. 38.75 mg [20.50:81.75]; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences observed in postoperative complications or length of hospital stay between the groups. CONCLUSION: Implementing an FTCA protocol using methadone, dexmedetomidine, magnesium, ketamine, lignocaine, and remifentanil together with protocolized weaning from a mechanical ventilation protocol is associated with significantly reduced time to tracheal extubation, improved postoperative analgesia, and reduced opioid use without any adverse safety events. A prospective randomized trial is warranted to further investigate the combined effects of these medications in reducing complications and length of stay in FTCA. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12623000060640.aspx , retrospectively registered on 17/01/2023).


Sujet(s)
Pontage aortocoronarien , Dexmédétomidine , Kétamine , Lidocaïne , Méthadone , Douleur postopératoire , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Pontage aortocoronarien/méthodes , Pontage aortocoronarien/effets indésirables , Méthadone/usage thérapeutique , Méthadone/administration et posologie , Dexmédétomidine/administration et posologie , Dexmédétomidine/usage thérapeutique , Kétamine/administration et posologie , Kétamine/usage thérapeutique , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur postopératoire/prévention et contrôle , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/usage thérapeutique , Magnésium/administration et posologie , Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Analgésiques morphiniques/administration et posologie , Résultat thérapeutique
20.
Biomacromolecules ; 25(7): 3959-3975, 2024 Jul 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934558

RÉSUMÉ

Microvascular surgery plays a crucial role in reconnecting micrometer-scale vessel ends. Suturing remains the gold standard technique for small vessels; however, suturing the collapsed lumen of microvessels is challenging and time-consuming, with the risk of misplaced sutures leading to failure. Although multiple solutions have been reported, the emphasis has predominantly been on resolving challenges related to arteries rather than veins, and none has proven superior. In this study, we introduce an innovative solution to address these challenges through the development of an injectable lidocaine-loaded pectin hydrogel by using computational and experimental methods. To understand the extent of interactions between the drug and the pectin chain, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and quantum mechanics (QM) calculations were conducted in the first step of the research. Then, a series of experimental studies were designed to prepare lidocaine-loaded injectable pectin-based hydrogels, and their characterization was performed by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and rheological analysis. After all the results were evaluated, the drug-loaded pectin-based hydrogel exhibiting self-healing properties was selected as a potential candidate for in vivo studies to determine its performance during operation. In this context, the hydrogel was injected into the divided vessel ends and perivascular area, allowing for direct suturing through the gel matrix. While our hydrogel effectively prevented vasospasm and facilitated micro- and supermicro-vascular anastomoses, it was noted that it did not cause significant changes in late-stage imaging and histopathological analysis up to 6 months. We strongly believe that pectin-based hydrogel potentially enhanced microlevel arterial, lymphatic, and particularly venous anastomoses.


Sujet(s)
Hydrogels , Pectine , Pectine/composition chimique , Hydrogels/composition chimique , Animaux , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/composition chimique , Anastomose chirurgicale/méthodes , Rats , Simulation de dynamique moléculaire , Mâle , Microvaisseaux/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...