RÉSUMÉ
Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) affects many breast cancer survivors and drastically affects their quality of life. There are several surveillance methods for BCRL that are critical at early detection. Prevention of BCRL involves knowledge of alternatives to aggressive axillary surgery, avoidance of axillary surgery, and de-escalation of axillary surgery. There are also techniques to better delineate the anatomy in the axilla to avoid taking nodes that drain the upper extremity. A multidisciplinary approach with medical oncology and radiation oncology can also help avoid unnecessary surgery or radiation that can together strongly increase the risk of BCRL.
Sujet(s)
Aisselle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein , Tumeurs du sein , Lymphadénectomie , Humains , Femelle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/thérapie , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Qualité de vie , Mastectomie/effets indésirablesRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most common surgical procedure associated with lymphedema formation is the regional lymphadenectomy. One of the advantages of sentinel node biopsy is the reduction of the risk of lymphedema formation. The purpose of this review is to collect and analyze the most relevant and recent evidence of the use of sentinel node biopsy and its implication on the development of postoperative lymphedema in gynecological cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: The current evidence of the use of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer to reduce lymphedema is heterogeneous and more data is needed to establish its role.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer is a staging procedure with lower surgical complications, as well as lymphedema formation; while the results of prospective trials evaluating its impact on quality of life are still lacking.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer minimizes the need for extensive dissection and reduces the incidence of complications associated with overharvesting of lymph nodes such as lymphedema without compromising oncological outcomes. SUMMARY: The prevalence of lymphedema in gynecological cancer varies based on the surgical treatment or additional therapies applied. Over the past years, one of the most important surgical modifications to decrease lymphedema formation has been implementation of sentinel lymph node technique mainly in vulvar cancer patients.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de l'appareil génital féminin , Lymphoedème , Biopsie de noeud lymphatique sentinelle , Humains , Femelle , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Biopsie de noeud lymphatique sentinelle/effets indésirables , Tumeurs de l'appareil génital féminin/chirurgie , Tumeurs de l'appareil génital féminin/anatomopathologie , Noeud lymphatique sentinelle/anatomopathologie , Noeud lymphatique sentinelle/chirurgie , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Tumeurs de la vulve/chirurgie , Tumeurs de la vulve/anatomopathologieSujet(s)
Aisselle , Tumeurs du sein , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Ethnies , Pronostic , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Biopsie de noeud lymphatique sentinelleRÉSUMÉ
Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have significantly improved survival rates. Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common mid-and long-term complication after breast cancer surgery, which seriously affects the quality of life. Breast reconstruction can not only restore the shape of the breasts after mastectomy, but also reduce the occurrence of lymphedema to some extent. Immediate autologous breast reconstruction combined with lymphatic venous anastomosis (LVA) or vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) can effectively prevent lymphedema. Delayed breast reconstruction combined with LVA or VLNT can achieve the dual benefits of restoring the appearance and treating lymphedema at the same time. The autologous tissue flap can function as a bridge to promote lymphatic drainage, thus enhancing the treatment of lymphedema. The advances mentioned above in surgical techniques have provided a basis for decision making in breast reconstruction and the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema, and have also brought hope for improving the quality of life of patients.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Lymphoedème , Mammoplastie , Humains , Femelle , Mammoplastie/méthodes , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lambeaux chirurgicaux , Mastectomie/effets indésirables , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/chirurgie , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Complications postopératoires/étiologieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) is a potential sequela of high-risk breast cancer treatment. Preventive treatment with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has emerged as the standard of care; however, there is relatively little known about factors that may contribute to procedural failure. METHODS: A retrospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved study followed patients who underwent ILR at the time of ALND at our tertiary care center between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients who presented for at least one follow-up visit in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic met the criteria for inclusion. Patients who developed lymphedema despite ILR and potential contributing factors were further explored. RESULTS: 349 patients underwent ILR at our institution between May 2018 and May 2023. 341 of these patients have presented for follow-up in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic. 32 (9.4%) patients developed lymphedema despite ILR. This cohort was significantly more likely to be obese (56% vs 35%, P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrates increased odds of procedural failure in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (odds ratio 2.6 [1.2-5.5], P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data comment upon our institutions outcomes following ILR. Patients who develop lymphedema despite ILR tend to have a higher BMI, with a significantly increased risk in patients with a BMI of 30 or greater. Consideration of these data is critical for preprocedural counseling and may support a BMI cutoff when considering candidacy for ILR going forward, as well as when optimizing failures for secondary lymphedema procedures.
Sujet(s)
Lymphoedème après cancer du sein , Tumeurs du sein , Lymphadénectomie , Obésité , Humains , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/chirurgie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Obésité/complications , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Tumeurs du sein/complications , Adulte , Aisselle/chirurgie , Sujet âgé , Indice de masse corporelle , Mastectomie/effets indésirables , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative chronic lymphocele and lymphedema represent severe burdens for soft tissue sarcoma patients who are already physically handicapped after an extensive surgery and a long recovery time. Incidences are high in the upper medial thigh. We have shifted our focus to lymphedema and lymphocele risk reduction with immediate lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) after sarcoma resection. METHODS: We performed immediate lymphatic reconstruction in 11 patients after soft tissue sarcoma resection in the upper medial thigh. The postoperative course was followed up closely, and postoperative occurrence of lymphocele and lymphedema was clinically assessed. A literature search outlining the latest clinical data, current treatment strategy landscape, and their application into clinical practice was added to the investigation. RESULTS: A total of 19 LVA and 2 lympho-lymphatic anastomoses were performed in 11 patients immediately after tumor resection in an end-to-end manner. We found a postoperative lymphedema rate of 36% and a postoperative lymphocele rate of 27%. Mean follow-up time was 17 months. Average tumor volume was 749 cc. Our literature search yielded 27 articles reporting on immediate LVA in cancer patients. Incidences of secondary lymphedema after LVA for lymphedema prevention vary between 0% and 31.1%. Lymphocele prevention with LVA is poorly studied in sarcoma patients. CONCLUSION: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction improved the overall postoperative course of our patients. The current literature does not serve with high-quality studies about primary LVA preventing lymphedema and lymphocele formation. We conclude that this technique should be seen as an additional concept to achieve overall better postoperative outcomes in these challenging surgical settings. We strongly recommend to either anastomose or ligate severed lymphatics under the microscope primarily after sarcoma resection in the upper medial thigh area.
Sujet(s)
Anastomose chirurgicale , Vaisseaux lymphatiques , Lymphoedème , Lymphocèle , Complications postopératoires , Sarcomes , Tumeurs des tissus mous , Cuisse , Humains , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Anastomose chirurgicale/méthodes , Cuisse/chirurgie , Lymphocèle/étiologie , Lymphocèle/chirurgie , Lymphocèle/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Vaisseaux lymphatiques/chirurgie , Mâle , Sarcomes/chirurgie , Adulte , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Complications postopératoires/chirurgie , Tumeurs des tissus mous/chirurgie , Sujet âgé , Résultat thérapeutique , Veines/chirurgie , Études de suivi , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) poses a significant risk following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), particularly affecting ethnic minorities, with a twofold increased risk. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM), a novel technique, shows potential in reducing BCRL rates, yet its utility in ethnic minorities lacks sufficient exploration. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the utility and outcomes of ARM on BCRL in an ethnic diverse group. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of ARM patients from January 2019 to July 2022 was conducted, monitoring patients over 24 months at 3-month intervals using SOZO® scores, with comparisons with preoperative baselines. RESULTS: Of the 212 patients, 83% belonged to ethnic minorities. SLNB was performed in 83%, ALND in 17%, and 62.3% underwent radiation therapy. Positive lymph nodes were found in 31.6%, with 22.2% exhibiting blue nodes and 25.9% exhibiting blue lymphatics. Of identified blue nodes, 70.2% were excised, including 51.5% crossover nodes. Lymphedema occurred in 3 patients, resulting in a BCRL rate of 1.4%. Compared with an historical BCRL incidence of 40.4% following ALND in ethnic minorities, our study reported a significantly lower rate of 8% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ARM procedure can significantly lower BCRL in ethnic minority groups. The combination of ARM and bioimpedance spectroscopy led to a remarkably low BCRL rate of 1.4%. Notably, none of the patients in our study developed an axillary recurrence at 24-month follow-up. Nevertheless, future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to better understand the utility of the ARM technique in this population.
Sujet(s)
Aisselle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein , Tumeurs du sein , Lymphadénectomie , Biopsie de noeud lymphatique sentinelle , Humains , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Biopsie de noeud lymphatique sentinelle/effets indésirables , Études de suivi , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Pronostic , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Ethnies/statistiques et données numériques , Noeuds lymphatiques/anatomopathologie , Noeuds lymphatiques/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is recognized as a surgical approach used to reduce the risk of developing secondary lymphedema, and evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ILR is favorable. Our Lymphatic Center has become a centralized location offering ILR for the risk-reduction in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in New England. Over the course of our experience, we made several modifications and adapted our approach to enhance the operative success of this procedure. These include advancements in our use of indocyanine green (ICG) imaging to identify baseline lymphatic anatomical variation, utilization of fluorescein isothiocyanate for lymphatic vessel visualization, application of the lymphosome concept to guide arm injection sites, verification of anastomotic patency (using ICG), localization of reconstruction to guide radiation therapy, incorporation of intraoperative tools to facilitate better anatomic visualization of the axilla, and addition of a lower extremity vein graft to mitigate venous-related complications. Collecting information from each surgery in a standardized manner, including intraoperative lymphatic channel measurements, and deploying clips for possible future radiation exposure, enables future studies on ILR patient outcomes. In this contribution, we aimed to share our institutional modifications with the surgical community to facilitate further adoption, conversation, and advancement of ILR for the risk-reduction in BCRL.
Sujet(s)
Vaisseaux lymphatiques , Humains , Femelle , Vaisseaux lymphatiques/chirurgie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/chirurgie , Vert indocyanine , /méthodes , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôleRÉSUMÉ
With new investigations and clinical trials in breast oncology reported every year, it is critical that surgeons be aware of advances and insights into the evolving care paradigms and treatments available to their patients. This article highlights five publications found to be particularly impactful this past year. These articles report on efforts to select the minimal effective dose of tamoxifen for prevention, to challenge the existing age-based screening guidelines as they relate to race and ethnicity, to refine axillary management treatment standards, to optimize systemic therapy in multidisciplinary care settings, and to reduce the burden of breast cancer-related lymphedema after treatment. Taken together, these efforts have an impact on all facets of the continuum of care from prevention and screening through treatment and survivorship.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Continuité des soins , Humains , Tumeurs du sein/thérapie , Femelle , Continuité des soins/normes , Lymphoedème/thérapie , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Tamoxifène/usage thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Lymphedema in the upper and lower extremities can lead to significant morbidity in patients, resulting in restricted joint movements, pain, discomfort, and reduced quality of life. While physiological lymphatic reconstructions such as lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), lymphovenous implantation (LVI), and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) have shown promise in improving patients' conditions, they only provide limited disease progression control or modest reversal. As lymphedema remains an incurable condition, the focus has shifted toward preventive measures in developed countries where most cases are iatrogenic due to cancer treatments. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) has been a particular concern, prompting the implementation of preventive measures like axillary reverse mapping. Similarly, techniques with lymph node-preserving concepts have been used to treat lower extremity lymphedema caused by gynecological cancers. Preventive lymphedema measures can be classified into primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. In this comprehensive review, we will explore the principles and methodologies encompassing lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA), LVA, lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis (LLA), VLNT, and lymph-interpositional-flap transfer (LIFT). By evaluating the advantages and limitations of these techniques, we aim to equip surgeons with the necessary knowledge to effectively address patients at high risk of developing lymphedema.
Sujet(s)
Lymphoedème , Humains , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Anastomose chirurgicale/méthodes , Prévention primaire/méthodes , Vaisseaux lymphatiques/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: We describe the feasibility and short-term outcome of our surgical technique to repair the lymph vessel disruption directly after axillary lymph node dissection during breast cancer surgery. This procedure is called immediate lymphatic reconstruction to prevent breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL), which frequently occurs after axillary lymph node dissection. The surgical technique consisted of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) or lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. We named the procedure lymphatic bypass supermicrosurgery (LBS). METHODS: This study used a retrospective cohort design of patients with breast cancer between May 2020 and February 2023. LBS was performed by making an intima-to-intima coaptation between afferent lymph vessels and the recipient's veins (LVA) or efferent lymph vessels lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients underwent lymphatic bypass. The mean age of patients was 50 ± 12 years, and most had stage III breast cancer (n = 59 [72%]). LVA was the most common type of lymphatic bypass (94.6%). The median number of LVA was 1 (range, 1-4) and 1 (range, 1-3) for lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. The median follow-up time was 12.5 months (range, 1-33 months). The 50 patients who had postoperative indocyanine green lymphography described arm dermal backflow stage 0 in 20 (40%), stage 1 in 19 (38%), stage 2 in 2 (4%), and stage 3 in 9 (18%) cases. The proportion of BCRL was 11 (22%), and subclinical lymphedema was 19 (38%) in this period. Most cases were in stable subclinical lymphedema (10, 58.8%). The 1-year and 2-year BCRL rates were 14% (95% confidence interval, 4%-23.9%) and 22% (95% confidence interval, 10.1%-33.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Along with the emerging immediate lymphatic reconstruction, LBS is a feasible supermicrosurgery technique that may have a potential role in BCRL prevention. A randomized controlled study would confirm the effectiveness of the technique.
Sujet(s)
Anastomose chirurgicale , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein , Tumeurs du sein , Études de faisabilité , Lymphadénectomie , Vaisseaux lymphatiques , Microchirurgie , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Vaisseaux lymphatiques/chirurgie , Vaisseaux lymphatiques/imagerie diagnostique , Anastomose chirurgicale/effets indésirables , Microchirurgie/effets indésirables , Microchirurgie/méthodes , Adulte , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Résultat thérapeutique , Facteurs temps , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/chirurgie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/étiologie , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème après cancer du sein/diagnostic , Mastectomie/effets indésirables , Sujet âgé , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème/imagerie diagnostique , Lymphographie , Veines/chirurgie , Veines/imagerie diagnostique , Veines/physiopathologieRÉSUMÉ
Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a lifelong disease associated with decreased quality of life and increased healthcare costs. Evidence supports early detection and prompt treatment through prospective surveillance models.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Lymphoedème , Humains , Femelle , Lymphoedème/diagnostic , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Qualité de vie , Études prospectives , Tumeurs du sein/complicationsRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema is a common complication of cancer treatment, such as lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy. It is a debilitating condition with pathologic tissue changes that hinder effective curative treatment and jeopardize patients' quality of life. Various attempts to prevent the development of lymphedema have been made, with improvements in the incidence of the pathology. However, it is still prevalent among survivors of cancer. In this paper, we review both molecular therapeutics and immediate surgical lymphatic reconstruction as treatment strategies after lymphadenectomy. Specifically, we discuss pro-lymphangiogenic molecules that have proved efficient in animal models of lymphedema and clinical trials, and review currently available microsurgical techniques of immediate lymphatic reconstruction. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through May 2022. Searches were done separately for molecular therapeutics and microsurgical techniques for immediate lymphatic reconstruction. Search terms used for (1) non-surgical methods include 'lymphangiogenesis,' 'lymphedema,' 'growth factor,' and 'gene therapy.' Search terms used for (2) surgical methods include 'lymphedema,' 'lymph node excision,' 'lymphatic vessels,' 'primary prevention,' and 'microsurgery.' RESULTS: Various pro-lymphangiogenic factors with therapeutic potential include VEGF-C, VEGF-D, HGF, bFGF, PDGF, IGF, Retinoic acid, Ang-1, S1P, TLR4, and IL-8. Microsurgical lymphatic reconstruction for prevention of secondary lymphedema includes lymphovenous anastomosis, vascularized lymph node flap transfer, and lymph-interpositional flap transfer, with promising clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: With growing knowledge of the lymphangiogenic pathway and lymphedema pathology and advances in microsurgical techniques to restore lymphatic channels, molecular and surgical approaches may represent a promising method for primary prevention of lymphedema.
Sujet(s)
Lymphadénectomie , Lymphangiogenèse , Vaisseaux lymphatiques , Lymphoedème , Microchirurgie , Humains , Lymphoedème/chirurgie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Microchirurgie/effets indésirables , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Animaux , Vaisseaux lymphatiques/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , /effets indésirables , Thérapie moléculaire ciblée , Tumeurs/chirurgie , Thérapie génétiqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect the LYMPHA technique on the incidence of upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer after complete axillary lymph node dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 89 patients with breast cancer and signs of metastatic lesion of axillary lymph nodes who underwent complete axillary lymph dissection. In group 1 (41 patients), the LYMPHA technique was used simultaneously with lymph node dissection; in group 2 (48 patients) - lymph node dissection alone. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 1 year. The LYMPHA technique prolonged surgery and decreased duration of postoperative lymphorrhea. The incidence of upper limb lymphedema was 9.8% and 22.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LYMPHA technique was effective for prevention of upper limb lymphedema after complete axillary lymph node dissection in the treatment of breast cancer.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Lymphoedème , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Lymphadénectomie/méthodes , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Lymphoedème/diagnostic , Aisselle/anatomopathologie , Aisselle/chirurgie , Noeuds lymphatiques/chirurgie , Noeuds lymphatiques/anatomopathologie , Membre supérieur/chirurgie , Membre supérieur/anatomopathologieRÉSUMÉ
This case study describes the successful management of a patient with primary lymphoedema, who was experiencing lymphorrhoea and epidermolysis, using a multidisciplinary approach. The patient had Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. The multidisciplinary team, in an outpatient clinic in Japan, included a certified lymphoedema therapist, plastic surgeons, and a wound, ostomy and continence nurse. The team performed complex physical therapy and lymphaticovenular anastomosis, which promoted the resolution of the lymphorrhoea. This resulted in improvements in skin condition, the prevention of recurrent cellulitis, and no increase in limb circumferences during the 1-year follow-up period. This report highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to lymphoedema management, including lymphorrhoea control that fitted in with the patient's daily life. It is hoped that this article will contribute to the improvement of the quality of life of patients with lymphoedema.
Sujet(s)
Lymphoedème , Qualité de vie , Humains , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôle , Cellulite sous-cutanée/thérapie , Anastomose chirurgicale/méthodes , Crises épileptiquesRÉSUMÉ
ABSTRACT: Lymphedema is a chronic condition, which can impact a person's quality of life and function. Identifying lymphedema at an early stage is key to preventing a person from developing chronic lymphedema. Physiatry can play an important role in education, identification of risk factors, performing prospective lymphedema surveillance programs, and prevention/treatment of lymphedema. Incorporating lymphedema surveillance programs into routine cancer care provides physiatry with the opportunity to assess additional rehabilitation and functional needs of a cancer patient.
Sujet(s)
Lymphoedème , Qualité de vie , Humains , Études prospectives , Lymphoedème/étiologie , Lymphoedème/prévention et contrôleRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: Upper limb lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment is the leading cause of lymphedema in France. Despite improved surgical practices and de-escalation of radiotherapy, the risk of lymphedema after breast cancer still affects 5-20% of patients, with this variation depending on the measurement method used and the population studied. Lymphedema has a negative impact on quality of life and body image, and their possible occurrence remains a major concern for all women treated for breast cancer. The Sénologie Commission of the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) asked four specialists in breast surgery or lymphology to prepare a summary on the prevention, medical and surgical management of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, and to discuss the medical and surgical innovations currently being evaluated. METHODS: This synthesis was based on national and international guidelines on the management of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and a recent review of the literature focusing on the years 2020-2023. RESULTS: From a preventive point of view, the restrictive instructions imposed for a long time (reduction in physical activity or the carrying of loads, air travel, exposure to the sun or cold, etc.) have altered patients' quality of life and should no longer be recommended. A good understanding of risk factors enables us to target preventive actions. Examples include obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, axillary clearance, radiotherapy of the axillary fossa in addition to axillary clearance, total mastectomy, taxanes or anti-HER-2 therapies in the adjuvant phase. Resumption of physical activity, minimally invasive axillary surgery, de-escalation of radiotherapy and breast-conserving surgical procedures have all demonstrated their preventive value. When lymphedema does occur, early management, through complete decongestive physiotherapy, can help reduce its volume and prevent its long-term worsening. CONCLUSION: Surgical (lymph node transplants, lympho-vascular anastomoses) and medical (prolymphangiogenic growth factors) approaches to lymphedema treatment are numerous, but require long-term evaluation of their efficacy and adverse effects.