Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 1.901
Filtrer
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e082093, 2024 Jun 10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858152

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the perspectives with the decision-making process between surgery and palliative, non-operative management of geriatric hip fracture patients and their proxies. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. Patients and proxies were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke's six-step guide. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Hip fracture patients in the Netherlands were eligible for inclusion. For hip fracture patients with a pre-existing diagnosis of dementia and for patients who opted for palliative, non-operative management, proxies were included. RESULTS: A total of 16 interviews were conducted, consisting of 4 patient interviews and 12 proxy interviews. Five themes were identified during thematic analysis: (1) underlying patient values, (2) the provision of information, (3) reasons to consider either palliative, non-operative management or surgery, (4) involvement in decision and (5) realisation of expectations. Information provided by the physician varied in terms of desired level of detail but involved discussing the advantages and disadvantages of surgery and palliative, non-operative management. Patients and proxies underscored the importance of achieving optimal quality of life, and the disparity between expected and actual treatment outcomes was unpleasant and negatively influenced the overall experience. CONCLUSIONS: In-depth analysis provided a unique insight into the patient and proxy perspectives in shared decision-making for geriatric hip fracture management in the acute setting. Overall, there were differences between reported experiences and preferences of participants. This heterogeneity stresses the importance of keeping a person-centred approach during shared decision-making. Other key considerations during shared decision-making include physicians informing patients from professional experience and communicating sensitively about both treatment options and prognosis. Physicians should aim to provide realistic, sensitive and timely information to both patients and proxies during the choice between curation and palliation for their hip fracture.


Sujet(s)
Prise de décision , Fractures de la hanche , Mandataire , Recherche qualitative , Humains , Fractures de la hanche/thérapie , Fractures de la hanche/psychologie , Pays-Bas , Femelle , Sujet âgé , Mâle , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Soins palliatifs/psychologie , Entretiens comme sujet , Qualité de vie
6.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 42(Suppl 1): 95-111, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748193

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The EQ-5D-Y is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure suitable for children and adolescents. There are two versions of the instrument, which differ in response levels: the three- (Y-3L) and five-level (Y-5L) versions. The Y-5L has been developed to improve the psychometric performance of the Y-3L. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of Y-5L and to compare the performance of Y-5L with Y-3L in separate self- and proxy-reported samples. METHODS: Both versions of the instrument were administered to children/adolescents (self-report) or caregivers (proxy-report) of Australian children aged 5-18 years. The data were gathered as part of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) study. The Y-5L and Y-3L were evaluated in terms of ceiling effects, criterion validity, inconsistency, informativity, and test-retest reliability in both proxy and self-complete populations. RESULTS: Overall, 5945 respondents completed both the Y-3L and Y-5L, with 2083 proxy and 3862 self-completed responses. Ceiling effects were lower in the Y-5L than the Y-3L. Items from the same domains show the strongest correlation for both samples. Regarding informativity, the Y-5L demonstrated more discriminatory power, indicated by having a higher Shannon diversity index in all domains of the Y-5L compared with the Y-3L. Test-retest showed fair agreement between responses at baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Y-5L has demonstrated moderate validity and fair reliability for use in measuring HRQoL in children and adolescents, both when self-reported by children or proxy reported. Overall, Y-5L is a dependable and valid extension from the Y-3L.


Sujet(s)
Psychométrie , Qualité de vie , Autorapport , Humains , Enfant , Adolescent , Femelle , Australie , Mâle , Reproductibilité des résultats , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Enquêtes et questionnaires/normes , État de santé , Aidants/psychologie , Mandataire
7.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 37(4): e13241, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747131

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The measurement of internal states of people with an intellectual disability is challenging. Given these difficulties, proxy respondents are sometimes used. However, the literature provides some caution about the validity of the use of proxy respondents. AIMS: This review aims to identify the available evidence regarding the use of proxy respondents in the measurement of internal states of people with intellectual disabilities. METHOD: The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework was used for this review, refined with the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology. RESULTS: Results indicate there are some differences in the findings reported with respect to the efficacy of the use of proxy respondents. These may be due to a number of inconsistencies and weaknesses in examinations of their utility. CONCLUSIONS: If proxy-reports are to be useful in understanding the internal states of people with intellectual disability, researchers need to address the shortcomings revealed by this review.


Sujet(s)
Déficience intellectuelle , Mandataire , Humains
9.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 96: 104031, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582016

RÉSUMÉ

Proxy procedures in psychiatry include proxy consultations, proxy prescriptions, covert and refill medications. Before Mental Healthcare Act (MHCA) 2017, there was minimal emphasis on the rights of individuals with Severe Mental Illness (SMI), leading family members to use proxy practices. With the new legislation, these practices have to be seen in a new light. Proxy consultations may be allowed for information, advice, etc. but not for giving medications or making a diagnosis. Proxy prescriptions can be given if the patient gives prior authorization or through nominated representative in advanced directive. Psychiatrists may consider covert medications if the patient lacks capacity, but not in emergencies. Medication refills can be given with physicians' recommendation for a specific duration.


Sujet(s)
Mandataire , Psychiatrie , Humains , Inde , Psychiatrie/législation et jurisprudence , Mandataire/législation et jurisprudence , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/diagnostic
10.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 33(6): 107700, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570060

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: With the rising global burden of stroke-related morbidity, and increased focus on patient-centered healthcare, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to inform healthcare decision-making. Some stroke patients with cognitive or motor impairments are unable to respond to PROMs, so proxies may respond on their behalf; the reliability of which remains unclear. The aim of the study is to update a 2010 systematic review to investigate the inter-rater reliability of proxy respondents answering PROMs for stroke patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies on the reliability of proxy respondents in stroke were searched within CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and WoS databases (01/07/22, 08/07/22). Fifteen studies were included for review. ICC and k-statistic were extracted for PROMs scales and categorized as poor (0.80). Bias was assessed using the CCAT. RESULTS: Five studies reported PROMs with inter-rater reliability scores ranging from 0.80. Two studies reported activities of daily living (ADLs) scores ranging from 0.41 to 0.80 and 8 studies reported quality of life (QoL) measures with scores ranging from 0.80. Subcategories of these scales included physical (ICC/k-statistic 0.41- >0.8), cognitive (ICC/k-statistic 0.40-0.80), communication (ICC/k-statistic <0.4-0.80,) and psychological (ICC/k-statistic <0.40-0.60) measures. CONCLUSIONS: Proxy respondents are reliable sources for PROM reports on physical domains in ADLs, PROMs and QoL scales. Proxy reports for measures of communication and psychological domains had greater variability in reliability scores, ranging from poor to substantial; hence, caution should be applied when interpreting proxy reports for these domains.


Sujet(s)
Activités de la vie quotidienne , Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients , Mandataire , Accident vasculaire cérébral , Humains , Évaluation de l'invalidité , Biais de l'observateur , Valeur prédictive des tests , Qualité de vie , Reproductibilité des résultats , Accident vasculaire cérébral/diagnostic , Accident vasculaire cérébral/thérapie , Accident vasculaire cérébral/psychologie , Accident vasculaire cérébral/physiopathologie , Résultat thérapeutique
11.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 67(6): 512-524.e2, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479536

RÉSUMÉ

CONTEXT: Efforts to reduce the psychological distress of surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients have had limited success, and some have even exacerbated distress. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of EMPOWER (Enhancing and Mobilizing the POtential for Wellness and Resilience), an ultra-brief (∼2-hour), 6-module manualized psychological intervention for surrogates. METHODS: Surrogates who reported significant anxiety and/or an emotionally close relationship with the patient (n=60) were randomized to receive EMPOWER or enhanced usual care (EUC) at one of three metropolitan hospitals. Participants completed evaluations of EMPOWER's acceptability and measures of psychological distress pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at 1- and 3-month follow-up assessments. RESULTS: Delivery of EMPOWER appeared feasible, with 89% of participants completing all 6 modules, and acceptable, with high ratings of satisfaction (mean=4.5/5, SD = .90). Compared to EUC, intent-to-treat analyses showed EMPOWER was superior at reducing peritraumatic distress (Cohen's d = -0.21, small effect) immediately post-intervention and grief intensity (d = -0.70, medium-large effect), posttraumatic stress (d = -0.74, medium-large effect), experiential avoidance (d = -0.46, medium effect), and depression (d = -0.34, small effect) 3 months post-intervention. Surrogate satisfaction with overall critical care (d = 0.27, small effect) was higher among surrogates randomized to EMPOWER. CONCLUSIONS: EMPOWER appeared feasible and acceptable, increased surrogates' satisfaction with critical care, and prevented escalation of posttraumatic stress, grief, and depression 3 months later.


Sujet(s)
Unités de soins intensifs , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Projets pilotes , Études de faisabilité , Détresse psychologique , Prise de décision , Maladie grave/psychologie , Adulte , Résultat thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Mandataire/psychologie , Stress psychologique/thérapie , Stress psychologique/psychologie , Études de suivi
12.
Qual Life Res ; 33(6): 1541-1553, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38472717

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children with suspected genetic conditions is important for understanding the effect of interventions such as genomic sequencing (GS). The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a widely used generic measure of HRQoL in pediatric patients, but its psychometric properties have not yet been evaluated in children undergoing diagnostic GS. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed caregivers at the time of their child's enrollment into GS research studies as part of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research (CSER) consortium. To evaluate structural validity of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales and PedsQL Infant Scales parent proxy-report versions, we performed a confirmatory factor analysis of the hypothesized factor structure. To evaluate convergent validity, we examined correlations between caregivers' reports of their child's health, assessed using the EQ VAS, and PedsQL scores by child age. We conducted linear regression analyses to examine whether age moderated the association between caregiver-reported child health and PedsQL scores. We assessed reliability using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 766 patients across all PedsQL age group versions (1-12 months through 13-18 years). Model fit failed to meet criteria for good fit, even after modification. Neither age group (categorical) nor age (continuous) significantly moderated associations between PedsQL scores and caregiver-reported child health. Cronbach's alphas indicated satisfactory internal consistency for most PedsQL scales. CONCLUSION: The PedsQL Generic Core Scales and Infant Scales may be appropriate to measure HRQoL in pediatric patients with suspected genetic conditions across a wide age range. While we found evidence of acceptable internal consistency and preliminary convergent validity in this sample, there were some potential problems with structural validity and reliability that require further attention.


Sujet(s)
Psychométrie , Qualité de vie , Humains , Enfant , Femelle , Mâle , Études transversales , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Adolescent , Enquêtes et questionnaires/normes , Nourrisson , Reproductibilité des résultats , Mandataire/psychologie , Aidants/psychologie , Parents/psychologie , Analyse statistique factorielle , État de santé
13.
Qual Life Res ; 33(6): 1555-1567, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507142

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: Rasch analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the structural validity of the ASCOT-Proxy measures completed by staff on behalf of older adults resident in care homes, by comparison to the ASCOT-SCT4, the measure of social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) from which the ASCOT-Proxy was developed. METHODS: EFA was conducted on the ASCOT-SCT4 and the two ASCOT-Proxy measures (Proxy-Proxy, Proxy-Resident), to determine if they retained the single factor of the original ASCOT-SCT4 measure found in samples of older community-dwelling adults. Rasch analysis was also applied to measures with a single factor structure in the EFA. RESULTS: ASCOT-Proxy-Resident had a single factor structure, as did the original ASCOT-SCT4 (also, found in this analysis when completed by care home staff). The ASCOT-Proxy-Proxy had a two factor structure. Rasch analysis of ASCOT-Proxy-Resident and ASCOT-SCT4 had an acceptable model fit, internal consistency and met the assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence. There was evidence of less than optimal distinguishability at some thresholds between responses, and low frequency of rating of the 'high level needs'. CONCLUSION: The ASCOT-Proxy-Resident is a valid instrument of SCRQoL for older adults resident in care homes, completed by staff proxies. Due to the two-factor structure, which differs from the original ASCOT-SCT4, we do not recommend the use of the ASCOT-Proxy-Proxy measure, although collecting data as part of the ASCOT-Proxy questionnaire may support its feasibility and acceptability. Further qualitative study of how care home staff complete and perceive the ASCOT-Proxy is encouraged for future studies.


Sujet(s)
Mandataire , Psychométrie , Qualité de vie , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Sujet âgé , Analyse statistique factorielle , Enquêtes et questionnaires/normes , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Reproductibilité des résultats , Maisons de repos , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Maisons de retraite médicalisées
14.
Health Econ ; 33(6): 1211-1228, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358920

RÉSUMÉ

Despite the growing need for surrogate decision-making for older adults, little is known about how surrogates make decisions and whether advance directives would change decision-making. We conducted a nationally representative experimental survey that cross-randomized cognitive impairment, gender, and characteristics of advance care planning among hospitalized older adults through a series of vignettes. Our study yielded three main findings: first, respondents were much less likely to recommend life-sustaining treatments for patients with dementia, especially after personal exposure. Second, respondents were more likely to ignore patient preferences for life-extending treatment when the patient had dementia, and choose unwanted life-extending treatments for patients without dementia. Third, in scenarios where the patient's wishes were unclear, respondents were more likely to choose treatments that matched their own preferences. These findings underscore the need for improved communication and decision-making processes for patients with cognitive impairment and highlight the importance of choosing a surrogate decision-maker with similar treatment preferences.


Sujet(s)
Prise de décision , Démence , Préférence des patients , Humains , Démence/thérapie , Mâle , Femelle , Sujet âgé , Directives anticipées , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mandataire , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Planification anticipée des soins
15.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 42(Suppl 1): 129-145, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238604

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Few preference-weighted instruments are available to measure health-related quality of life in young children (2-4 years of age). The EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L were recently modified for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of these adapted versions for use with parent proxies of children aged 2-4 years and to compare their performance with the original versions. It was hypothesised that the adapted instrument wording would result in improved psychometric performance. METHODS: Survey data of children aged 2-4 years were obtained from the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison study. Distributional and psychometric properties tested included feasibility, convergence, distribution of level scores, ceiling effects, known-group validity (Cohen's D effect sizes for prespecified groups defined by the presence/absence of special healthcare needs [SHCNs]), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]), and responsiveness (standardised response mean [SRM] effect sizes for changes in health). Level sum scores were used to provide summary outcomes. Supplementary analysis using utility scores (from the Swedish EQ-5D-Y-3L value set) were conducted for the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L, and no value sets were available for the EQ-5D-Y-5L. RESULTS: A total of 842 parents of children aged 2-4 years completed the survey. All instruments were easy to complete. There was strong convergence between the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. The adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L and adapted EQ-5D-Y-5L showed more responses in the severe levels of the five EQ-5D-Y dimensions, particularly in the usual activity and mobility dimensions (EQ-5D-Y-5L: mobility level 1: adapted n = 478 [83%], original n = 253 [94%]; mobility level 4/5: adapted n = 17 [2.9%], original n = 4 [1.5%)]). The difference in the distribution of responses was more evident in children with SHCNs. Assessment of known-group validity showed a greater effect size for the adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L and adapted EQ-5D-Y-5L compared with the original instruments (EQ-5D-Y-5L: adapted Cohen's D = 1.01, original Cohen's D = 0.83) between children with and without SHCNs. The adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L and adapted EQ-5D-Y-5L showed improved reliability at 4-week follow-up, with improved ICCs (EQ-5D-Y-5L: adapted ICC = 0.83, original ICC = 0.44). The responsiveness of all instruments moved in the hypothesised direction for better or worse health at follow-up. Probability of superiority analysis showed little/no differences between the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. Supplementary psychometric analysis of the adapted and original EQ-5D-Y-3L using utilities showed comparable findings with analyses using level sum scores. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest improved psychometric performance of the adapted version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in children aged 2-4 years compared with the original versions.


Sujet(s)
Mandataire , Psychométrie , Qualité de vie , Humains , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Mâle , Enquêtes et questionnaires/normes , Reproductibilité des résultats , Australie , Parents , État de santé
16.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 42(Suppl 1): 113-128, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280125

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Self-reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children is not always feasible. To date, proxy perspectives (Proxy versions 1 and 2) using the EQ-5D-Y-3L have not been explored for its impact on agreement with child self-report. Proxy version 1 requires the proxy to consider their own view of the child's HRQoL (proxy-proxy), while with Proxy version 2, the proxy is asked to respond as they believe their child would self-report their HRQoL (proxy-child). This study compared the inter-rater and intra-proxy agreement (overall and dimension level) using the EQ-5D-Y-3L self, proxy-proxy, and proxy-child reports. METHODS: A community-based sample of child (aged 6-12 years) and parent dyads were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. The child self-completed the EQ-5D-Y-3L independently of the parent who completed the EQ-5D-Y-3L from proxy-proxy and proxy-child perspectives. Agreement was determined using Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCCs) for the overall (preference-weighted) HRQoL, while agreement at the dimension level was evaluated using Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1). To assess the differences between the self and the two proxy reports, the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test was used. RESULTS: This study involved 85 child-parent dyads. The agreement between self and proxy overall HRQoL was low (fair) with both proxy-proxy (CCC = 0.28) and proxy-child (CCC = 0.26) reports. The largest discrepancy in the child-proxy agreement at dimension level with both the proxy versions was observed for 'feeling worried, sad or unhappy'. Within this dimension, the proxy-child perspective resulted in a stronger agreement (AC1 = 0.7, good) with child self-report compared with the traditional proxy-proxy perspective (AC1 = 0.58, moderate). Although the preference-weighted HRQoL was consistent across both the proxy perspectives, a significant difference was observed in the EQ VAS scores (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that choice of proxy perspective may have an impact on the problems reported on HRQoL dimensions and EQ VAS scores. However, in this community-based sample of generally healthy children, no significant difference was observed in the inter-rater agreement for child-self and proxy preference-weighted EQ-5D-Y-3L values based on proxy perspectives. While this suggests that preference-weighted data are not sensitive to the choice of perspective, these findings may differ for different HRQoL instruments and for alternative value sets with different properties.


Sujet(s)
Parents , Mandataire , Qualité de vie , Autorapport , Humains , Enfant , Femelle , Mâle , Parents/psychologie , Enquêtes et questionnaires , État de santé , Reproductibilité des résultats
17.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 41(2): 125-132, 2024 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36997165

RÉSUMÉ

When patients lose decision-making capacity, others must make surrogate decisions on their behalf. What counts as a surrogate decision might seem self-evident. But as clinician-researchers in the field of advance care planning, we have found that it is not always so clear-cut. In this paper, we describe how and why this is a matter of concern, a novel approach for assessing whether a surrogate decision occurred, and findings from this assessment.


Sujet(s)
Planification anticipée des soins , Prise de décision , Humains , Mandataire , Patients
18.
Acta Paediatr ; 113(2): 303-308, 2024 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855195

RÉSUMÉ

AIM: To assess fatigue in children aged 2-17 years with asthma from both child and parent perspectives and describe associated factors. METHODS: Fatigue scores were self-reported by children aged 5-17 years old and proxy-reported by parents or carers for all children. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale was used. Fatigue scores ranged from 0 to 100, higher scores meant less fatigue. RESULTS: There were 527 children and parents enrolled. The mean overall fatigue score by self-report was 72.7 ± 15.8 and by proxy report was 75.8 ± 16.3. Self-reported fatigue score was lower in children aged 5-7 years (71.5 ± 15.9) compared to proxy-reported score (76.3 ± 15.5). Proxy and self-reported fatigue scores were similar between parents and older children. Fatigue scores were lower in association with poor asthma control and receipt of social support. Lower self-reported, but not proxy-reported, fatigue score was related to asthma severity. Lower proxy-reported, but not self-reported, fatigue score was related to the child being older and having shortness of breath. CONCLUSION: Parents underestimated the fatigue of younger children aged 5-7 years, but fatigue scores were similar between parents and older children. Both clinical and social factors are associated with fatigue in children with asthma.


Sujet(s)
Asthme , Qualité de vie , Enfant , Humains , Adolescent , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Autorapport , Fatigue/étiologie , Asthme/complications , Asthme/épidémiologie , Parents , Mandataire , Enquêtes et questionnaires
19.
Gerontologist ; 64(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102748

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Proxy respondents are an important tool in survey research, especially among people with cognitive impairment. However, proxy respondents may be unable to accurately answer subjective survey instruments for cognitively impaired persons. This study investigates the mediating effect of proxy status on the relationship between cognitive impairment and subjectively rated health. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Respondents from the 2018 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (N = 17,146) were included, and the Baron and Kenny method assessed the potential mediating role of having a proxy on subjectively rated health. Subjectively rated health and proxy status were dichotomously coded, and relationships between cognitive impairment, proxy status, and subjectively rated health were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Findings indicate that cognitive impairment is inversely associated with subjectively rated health, and it is directly associated with having a proxy. They also indicate that having a proxy is inversely related to subjectively rated health. When including proxy status and cognitive impairment in the same model, cognitive impairment no longer predicted subjectively rated health. This indicates that proxy status perfectly mediated the relationship between cognitive impairment and subjectively rated health. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Measuring the experiences of people with cognitive impairment is challenging in survey research due to the limiting features of cognitive impairment. Although having a proxy respondent helps address attrition-related measurement challenges in survey research, findings indicate that proxies report worse subjectively rated health for people with cognitive impairment compared to individuals with comparable levels of cognitive impairment without a proxy. Future research may benefit from exploring optimal proxy-respondent characteristics.


Sujet(s)
Dysfonctionnement cognitif , État de santé , Mandataire , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Dysfonctionnement cognitif/psychologie , Sujet âgé , Adulte d'âge moyen , Cognition , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Autorapport , Auto-évaluation diagnostique
20.
J Clin Ethics ; 34(4): 307-319, 2023.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37991730

RÉSUMÉ

AbstractSurrogate selection can be extremely consequential for patients. Most surrogates are selected by default, so we should care about whether legal provisions for default surrogate selections are ethically justified. Most U.S. states use an inflexible, prioritized list of relationships, that is, a hierarchical list where eligible classes of higher-ranked individuals must be selected before lower-ranked individuals. I argue that while some inflexible, prioritized lists may roughly reflect the order that many patients would select, there is a significant minority that inflexible lists systematically disempower. This is morally unacceptable given the availability of less morally problematic alternatives. One alternative is a flexible, prioritized list, which provides conditions for lower-ranked individuals to be selected ahead of higher-ranked ones. I argue that since all the U.S. states that currently have an inflexible, prioritized list systematically disempower a significant proportion of their residents, they have good reason to adopt a flexible, prioritized list instead. Furthermore, the Universal Law Commission currently recommends that states adopt an inflexible, prioritized list, so they have good reason to change their recommendation.


Sujet(s)
Théorie éthique , Mandataire , Humains
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...