Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 3.080
Filtrer
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 459, 2024 Jul 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971756

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This particulate consists of metals, drug crystals, glass fragments, or cotton fibers and can be generated by drug packaging, incomplete reconstitution, and chemical incompatibilities. In-line filters have been shown to remove micro-organisms, endotoxin, air, and particles in critically ill adults and older infants, but its benefits in newborn remain to be demonstrated. Moreover, 50% of inflammatory episodes in the setting of NICUs are blood culture-negative. These episodes could be partly related to the presence of particles in the infusion lines. METHODS: A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled trial was designed. All infants admitted to NICUs for which prolonged infusion therapy is expected will be enrolled in the study and randomized to the Filter or Control arm. All patients will be monitored until discharge, and data will be analyzed according to a "full analysis set." The primary outcome is the frequency of patients with at least one sepsis-like event, defined by any association of suspected sepsis symptoms with a level of c-reactive protein (CRP) > 5 mg/L in a negative-culture contest. The frequency of sepsis, phlebitis, luminal obstruction, and the duration of mechanical ventilation and of catheter days will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. The sample size was calculated at 368 patients per arm. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter randomized control trial that compares in-line filtration of parenteral nutrition and other intravenous drugs to infusion without filters. Sepsis-like events are commonly diagnosed in clinical practice and are more frequent than sepsis in a positive culture contest. The risk of these episodes in the target population is estimated at 30-35%, but this data is not confirmed in the literature. If the use of in-line filters results in a significant decrease in sepsis-like events and/or in any other complications, the use of in-line filters in all intravenous administration systems may be recommended in NICUs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05537389, registered on 12 September 2022 ( https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/results/NCT05537389?view=results ).


Sujet(s)
Filtration , Unités de soins intensifs néonatals , Études multicentriques comme sujet , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Humains , Nouveau-né , Filtration/instrumentation , Méthode en simple aveugle , Perfusions veineuses , Sepsie , Cathétérisme veineux central/effets indésirables , Cathétérisme veineux central/instrumentation , Nutrition parentérale/effets indésirables , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Résultat thérapeutique , Protéine C-réactive/analyse
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(27): e38820, 2024 Jul 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968469

RÉSUMÉ

This study examines the effectiveness of nasojejunal and intravenous nutrition in supplementing nutrition for patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) strictures and analyzes the risk factors associated with malnutrition to provide references for clinical nutrition strategies. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 patients with upper GI strictures caused by esophageal and gastric cancers, who received nutritional support from January 2015 to January 2023. Out of these, 53 patients had complete baseline and follow-up data. We collected general clinical and perioperative data for comparison of the efficacy between nasojejunal nutrition and intravenous nutrition. Risk factors for malnutrition were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Malnutrition occurred in 24.53% (13/53) of the patients with upper GI strictures. The incidence of malnutrition was 6.06% (2/33) in the nasojejunal nutrition group compared to 55.00% (11/20) in the intravenous nutrition group, with a statistically significant difference (P < .001). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified diabetes (P < .001), initial blood K (P = .011), pathological staging (P < .001), and pathological grading (P < .001) as risk factors for malnutrition in patients with upper GI strictures. Diabetes (P = .028), initial blood K (P = .018), and pathological staging (P = .011) were found to be independent risk factors. Nasojejunal nutrition results in a lower incidence of malnutrition compared to intravenous nutrition in patients with upper GI strictures. Diabetes, initial blood K, pathological staging, and pathological grading are risk factors for malnutrition, with diabetes, initial blood K, and pathological staging serving as independent risk factors.


Sujet(s)
Malnutrition , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Adulte d'âge moyen , Malnutrition/étiologie , Malnutrition/épidémiologie , Sujet âgé , Sténose pathologique/étiologie , Tumeurs de l'estomac/complications , Nutrition entérale/méthodes , Adulte , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Incidence
3.
Saudi Med J ; 45(7): 653-657, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955453

RÉSUMÉ

The validity of the traditional nutritional assessment tools in intensive care settings might be compromised when the patient has conditions such as oedema and inflammation. Ultrasound (US) is considered a non-invasive, bedside tool that can be utilized to assess changes in muscle mass. Hence, US could guide healthcare practitioners in identifying the varying degrees of malnutrition and adjusting the nutritional prescription accordingly. This review discusses the currently available data regarding the feasibility and practicality of using US measurements in intensive care settings. Overall, the data suggest that using US as part of the standard anthropometric assessment for critically ill patients is a promising tool to track variations in muscle mass. This has the potential to enhance nutritional prescription and tailor the provision of protein and energy to critically ill patients based on their lean body mass measurements. Therefore, it is recommended to train dietitians on utilizing US for body composition measurements.


Sujet(s)
Soins de réanimation , Maladie grave , Nutrition entérale , Évaluation de l'état nutritionnel , Nutrition parentérale , Échographie , Humains , Échographie/méthodes , Nutrition entérale/méthodes , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Soins de réanimation/méthodes , Unités de soins intensifs , Composition corporelle , Malnutrition
4.
Clin Nutr ; 43(7): 1696-1705, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823267

RÉSUMÉ

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recognized as a complex high-risk therapy. Its practice is highly variable and frequently suboptimal in pediatric patients. Optimizing care requires evidence, consensus-based guidelines, audits of practice, and standardized strategies. Several pediatric scientific organizations, expert panels, and authorities have recently recommended that standardized PN should generally be used over individualized PN in the majority of pediatric patients including very low birth weight premature infants. In addition, PN admixtures produced and validated by a suitably qualified institution are recommended over locally produced PN. Licensed multi chamber bags are standardized PN bags that comply with Good Manufacturing Practice and high-quality standards for the finished product in the frame of their full manufacturing license. The purpose of this article is to review the practical aspects of PN and the evidence for using such multi-chamber bags in pediatric patients. It highlights the safety characteristics and the limitations of the different PN practices and provides some guidance for ensuring safe and efficient therapy in pediatric patients.


Sujet(s)
Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Nouveau-né , Nutrition parentérale/normes , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Nourrisson , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Adolescent , Solutions d'alimentation parentérale/normes , Prématuré , Guides de bonnes pratiques cliniques comme sujet , Nourrisson très faible poids naissance
6.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(Supplement_3): S102-S111, 2024 Jun 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869256

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit concerning the acute care setting. Some European practices presented in this article do not conform with USP general chapter <797> requirements. Nevertheless, the purpose is to cover the challenges experienced in delivering high-quality PN within hospitals in the United States and Europe, in order to share best practices and experiences more widely. SUMMARY: Core issues regarding the PN process within an acute care setting are largely the same everywhere: There are ongoing pressures for greater efficiency, optimization, and also concurrent commitments to make PN safer for patients. Within Europe, in recent years, the use of market-authorized multi-chamber bags (MCBs) has increased greatly, mainly for safety, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency purposes. However, in the US, hospitals with low PN volumes may face particular challenges, as automated compounding equipment is often unaffordable in this setting and the variety of available MCBs is limited. This can result in the need to operate several PN systems in parallel, adding to the complexity of the PN use process. Ongoing PN quality and safety initiatives from US institutions with various PN volumes are presented. In the future, the availability of a greater selection of MCBs in the US may increase, leading to a reduction in dependence on compounded PN, as has been seen in many European countries. CONCLUSION: The examples presented may encourage improvements in the safety and quality of PN within the acute care setting worldwide.


Sujet(s)
Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Europe , Hôpitaux , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Nutrition parentérale/normes , Solutions d'alimentation parentérale , Sécurité des patients , Pharmacie d'hôpital/organisation et administration , États-Unis , Congrès comme sujet
7.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(Supplement_3): S89-S101, 2024 Jun 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869257

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is an established therapy when oral/enteral feeding is not sufficient or is contraindicated, but nevertheless PN remains a complex, high-alert medication that is susceptible to errors that may affect patient safety. Over time, considerable progress has been made to make PN practices safer. The purpose of this article is to address ongoing challenges to improve the PN use process from prescription to administration and monitoring, and to outline practical aspects fostering the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of PN, as discussed at the International Safety and Quality of PN Summit. SUMMARY: Opportunities to improve the PN use process in clinical practice include the promotion of inter-disciplinary communication, vigilant surveillance for complications, staff education to increase competency, and more consistent use of advanced technologies that allow automated safety checks throughout the PN process. Topics covered include considerations on PN formulations, including the value of intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs), trends in compounding PN, the current and future role of market-authorized multi-chamber PN bags containing all 3 macronutrients (amino acids, glucose/dextrose, and ILE) in the United States and in Europe, and strategies to cope with the increasing global problem of PN product shortages. CONCLUSION: This review outlines potential strategies to use in clinical practice to overcome ongoing challenges throughout the PN use process, and ultimately promote PN patient safety.


Sujet(s)
Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Sécurité des patients , Émulsion lipidique intraveineuse/usage thérapeutique , États-Unis , Internationalité , Europe
8.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(Supplement_3): S121-S136, 2024 Jun 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869258

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit (held November 8-10, 2021, at Charleston, SC, and Bad Homburg, Germany) and aims to raise awareness concerning unresolved issues associated with the PN process and potential future directions, including a greater emphasis on patients' perspectives and the role of patient support. SUMMARY: Ensuring that every patient in need receives adequate PN support remains challenging. It is important to have a standardized approach to identify nutritional risk and requirements using validated nutritional screening and assessment tools. Gaps between optimal and actual clinical practices need to be identified and closed, and responsibilities in the nutrition support team clarified. Use of modern technology opens up opportunities to decrease workloads or liberate resources, allowing a more personalized care approach. Patient-centered care has gained in importance and is an emerging topic within clinical nutrition, in part because patients often have different priorities and concerns than healthcare professionals. Regular assessment of health-related quality of life, functional outcomes, and/or overall patient well-being should all be performed for PN patients. This will generate patient-centric data, which should be integrated into care plans. Finally, communication and patient education are prerequisites for patients' commitment to health and for fostering adherence to PN regimes. CONCLUSION: Moving closer to optimal nutritional care requires input from healthcare professionals and patients. Patient-centered care and greater emphasis on patient perspectives and priorities within clinical nutrition are essential to help further improve clinical nutrition.


Sujet(s)
Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Nutrition parentérale/normes , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Sécurité des patients/normes , Soins centrés sur le patient , Amélioration de la qualité , Qualité de vie , Congrès comme sujet
9.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(Supplement_3): S75-S88, 2024 Jun 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869255

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: The International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit consisted of presentations, discussions, and formulation of consensus statements. The purpose here is to briefly summarize the summit and to present the consensus statements. SUMMARY: There was a high degree of consensus, with all statements approved by all authors/summit experts. These consensus statements should be regarded not as formal guidelines but rather as best-practice guidance intended to complement national and international nutrition society evidence-based guidelines and position statements. This article also summarizes key discussion topics from the summit, encompassing up-to-date knowledge and practical guidance concerning PN safety and quality in various countries and clinical settings, focusing on adult patients. Clear geographical differences exist between practices in Europe and the United States, and different approaches to improve the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of PN vary, particularly with regard to the delivery systems used. Discussion between experts allowed for an exchange of practical experience in optimizing PN use processes, opportunities for standardization, use of electronic systems, potential improvements in PN formulations, better management during PN component shortages, and practical guidance to address patients' needs, particularly during long-term/home PN. CONCLUSION: The consensus statements are the collective opinion of the panel members and form best-practice guidance. The authors intend that this guidance may help to improve the safety and quality of PN in a variety of settings by bridging the gap between published guideline recommendations and common practical issues.


Sujet(s)
Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Nutrition parentérale/normes , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Consensus , Sécurité des patients/normes , Guides de bonnes pratiques cliniques comme sujet
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(7): 466, 2024 Jun 27.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935156

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: Parenteral nutrition (PN) can be an effective treatment to improve the nutritional status of patients with pancreatic cancer, but the effects of PN on quality of life (QoL) are still understudied. Therefore, we aimed at investigating whether the best supportive nutritional care (BSNC) in combination with PN at home compared to BSNC alone changed QoL in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy over a period of 7 weeks. METHODS: n = 12 patients in the PANUSCO study received nutritional counseling only (control group (CG)) and n = 9 patients were also given supportive PN (intervention group (IG)). The primary endpoint was the change of QoL (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26) over 7 weeks between the groups. RESULTS: There was a significant worsening in social functioning in IG (p = 0.031) and a significant difference between groups in change of social functioning (p = 0.020). In all other domains of QoL, there was no significant difference between groups. Within groups, there was a significant improvement in the domain weight loss in IG (p = 0.031), showing that patients were less worried about their weight being too low. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the change of BW over time between groups (p < 0.001) with IG showing an increase (p = 0.004) and CG showing no change (p = 0.578). CONCLUSION: The administration of PN had in one of five domains negative consequences on QoL. The decision to administer PN should always be made individually and together with the patient, and the impact on QoL should be included in the decision to administer PN.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du pancréas , Nutrition parentérale , Qualité de vie , Humains , Tumeurs du pancréas/thérapie , Tumeurs du pancréas/psychologie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Soutien nutritionnel/méthodes , État nutritionnel
11.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 48(5): 580-587, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734877

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Safe and efficient provision of intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) requires a strategy to individualize infusion rates. Estimating the maximum acceptable infusion rate (MaxInfRate) of soybean oil-based ILE (SO-ILE) in individuals by using a triglyceride (TG) kinetic model was reported to be feasible. In this study, we aimed to externally validate and, if needed, update the MaxInfRate estimation. METHODS: The maximum TG concentration (TGmax) in patients receiving SO-ILE at MaxInfRate was evaluated to determine if it met the definition of being <400 mg/dl for 90th percentile of patients. The TG kinetic model was evaluated through prediction performance checks and was subsequently updated using the data set of both the previous model development and present validation studies. RESULTS: Out of 83 patients, 74 had TGmax <400 mg/dl, corresponding to a probability of 89.2% (95% CI, 81.9%-95.2%), and the 90th percentile of TGmax was 400 mg/dl (95% CI, 328-490 mg/dl), closely aligned with the theoretical values. However, the individual TGmax values were biased by the infusion rate because the covariate effects were overestimated in the TG kinetic model, requiring a minor revision. The updated MaxInfRate with the combined data set showed unbiased and more accurate predictions. CONCLUSION: The MaxInfRate was validated in external inpatients and updated with all available data. MaxInfRate estimation for individuals could be an option for the safe and efficient provision of SO-ILE.


Sujet(s)
Émulsion lipidique intraveineuse , Huile de soja , Triglycéride , Humains , Émulsion lipidique intraveineuse/administration et posologie , Huile de soja/administration et posologie , Mâle , Femelle , Triglycéride/sang , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études de cohortes , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Perfusions veineuses/méthodes , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes
12.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 48(5): 546-553, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734876

RÉSUMÉ

Obesity is a challenging chronic disease process that continues to affect a large percentage of the population at large. With the advent of new therapeutic options and interventions and a deeper scientific understanding of obesity as a complex illness, there is hope in curtailing this evolving pandemic. In this article, we present key medical information to engage and empower nutrition-focused providers to manage obesity and its nutrition complications. The topics summarized here were presented during the 2023 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Preconference Physician Course and include pathophysiology and hormonal regulation of obesity, multidisciplinary care planning and nutrition risk stratification of patients, and common approaches to treatment, including lifestyle modifications, antiobesity medications, and procedures from the perspective of the nutrition specialist.


Sujet(s)
Obésité , Humains , Obésité/thérapie , Agents antiobésité/usage thérapeutique , Médecins , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Mode de vie , Nutrition entérale/méthodes , Nutritionnistes
14.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 8(1)2024 May 12.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735834

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence regarding the optimal time to commence parenteral nutrition (PN) in term and late preterm infants. DESIGN: Single-centre, non-blinded, exploratory randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A level-3 neonatal unit in a stand-alone paediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Infants born ≥34 weeks of gestation and ≤28 days, who needed PN. Eligible infants were randomised on day 1 or day 2 of admission. INTERVENTIONS: Early (day 1 or day 2 of admission, N=30) or late (day 6 of admission, N=30) PN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma phenylalanine and F2-isoprostane levels on day 4 and day 8 of admission. Secondary outcomes were amino-acid and fatty-acid profiles on day 4 and day 8, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The postnatal age at randomisation was similar between the groups (2.3 (SD 0.8) vs 2.3 (0.7) days, p=0.90). On day 4, phenylalanine levels in early-PN infants were higher than in late-PN (mean (SD) 62.9 (26.7) vs 45.5 (15.3) µmol/L; baseline-adjusted percentage difference 25.8% (95% CI 11.6% to 39.9%), p<0.001). There was no significant difference in phenylalanine levels between the two groups on day 8. There was no significant difference between the groups for F2-isoprostane levels on day 4 (early-PN mean (SD) 389 (176) vs late-PN 419 (291) pg/mL; baseline-adjusted percentage difference: -4.4% (95% CI -21.5% to 12.8%) p=0.62) and day 8 (mean (SD) 305 (125) vs 354 (113) pg/mL; adjusted mean percentage difference -16.1 (95% CI -34.1 to 1.9) p=0.09).Postnatal growth restriction for weight was less severe in the early-PN group (change in weight z-score from baseline to discharge: -0.6 (0.6) vs -1.0 (0.6); p=0.02). The incidence of hyperglycaemia was greater in the early-PN group (20/30 (66.7%) vs 11/30 (36.7%), p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of the commencement of PN did not seem to affect the degree of oxidative stress in critically ill term and late preterm infants. The effect of transiently high plasma phenylalanine with early PN on clinical outcomes requires further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000324910.


Sujet(s)
Prématuré , Nutrition parentérale , Phénylalanine , Humains , Prématuré/sang , Prématuré/croissance et développement , Nouveau-né , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Mâle , Femelle , Phénylalanine/sang , Facteurs temps , F2-isoprostanes/sang , Âge gestationnel
15.
Nutr Hosp ; 41(3): 702-705, 2024 Jun 27.
Article de Espagnol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726617

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction: Objectives: the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections is a critical aspect of care for patients with intestinal failure who are treated with parenteral nutrition. The use of taurolidine in this context is becoming increasingly popular, however there is a lack of standardization in its pediatric application. The objective of this work is to develop a guide to support its prescription. Methodology: the guide is based on a review of the literature and expert opinions from the Intestinal Failure Group of the SEGHNP. It was developed through a survey distributed to all its members, addressing aspects of usual practice with this lock solution. Results: this manuscript presents general recommendations concerning taurolidine indications, commercial presentations, appropriate forms of administration, use in special situations, adverse reactions, and contraindications in the pediatric population Conclusions: taurolidine is emerging as the primary lock solution used to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections, proving to be safe and effective. This guide aims to optimize and standardize its use in pediatrics.


Introducción: Objetivo: la prevención de las infecciones asociadas a catéter ocupa un papel fundamental en los cuidados del paciente en situación de fracaso intestinal en tratamiento con nutrición parenteral. El empleo del sellado del catéter con taurolidina con ese fin se ha generalizado sin que exista una estandarización sobre su uso en población pediátrica. El objetivo de este trabajo es elaborar una guía clínica que sirva de apoyo en su utilización. Métodos: la guía se basa en una revisión de la literatura y en la opinión de expertos del Grupo de Trabajo de Fracaso Intestinal de la SEGHNP recogida a través de una encuesta realizada a todos sus integrantes sobre aspectos de la práctica habitual con este sellado. Resultados: este manuscrito expone unas recomendaciones en cuanto a las indicaciones, presentaciones comerciales disponibles, forma adecuada de administración, uso en situaciones especiales, reacciones adversas y contraindicaciones de la taurolidina en población pediátrica. Conclusiones: el sellado con taurolidina para la prevención de la infección asociada a catéter venoso central se ha mostrado como un tratamiento eficaz y seguro. La presente guía pretender optimizar y homogeneizar su uso en pediatría.


Sujet(s)
Insuffisance intestinale , Nutrition parentérale , Taurine , Thiadiazines , Humains , Thiadiazines/usage thérapeutique , Thiadiazines/effets indésirables , Enfant , Taurine/analogues et dérivés , Taurine/usage thérapeutique , Nutrition parentérale/normes , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Insuffisance intestinale/thérapie , Infections sur cathéters/prévention et contrôle , Cathétérisme veineux central/effets indésirables , Anti-infectieux/usage thérapeutique , Nourrisson , Enfant d'âge préscolaire
16.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(8): 3327-3336, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730194

RÉSUMÉ

To evaluate the influence of early nutritional intake on the growth pattern of very preterm infants. This was an observational study including 109 newborns (< 32 weeks gestational age). Perinatal morbidities, nutritional therapy (first four weeks of life), and weight, length, and head circumference (HC) growth at term-equivalent age were evaluated. Growth restriction was defined as a difference > 1.2 SD between the birth and term age measurements. Growth restriction at term-equivalent age: 52.3% (weight), 42.9% (length), and 22% (HC). Morbidities were positively correlated with nutrition therapy and negatively correlated with the total energy provision: protein ratio. The duration of parenteral nutrition, the time to reach full enteral feedings, and the total energy provision: protein ratio were significantly correlated. Nutrient intake influenced weight, length, and HC growth, and cumulative energy deficit was significantly associated with HC growth restriction.   Conclusion: Perinatal morbidities interfere with nutritional therapy and early nutrient intake, leading to insufficient energy and energy provision: protein ratio for growth. What is Known: • The intake of macronutrients early in life, mainly protein, is important for the optimal growth of pretem infants. • The severity of morbidities and low gestational ages impact the nutritional management of preterm infants. What is New: • The number of morbidities, reflecting the severity of the neonatal clinical course, had a detrimental effect on the nutritional therapy and nutrients intake. • The inadequate energy provision per gram of protein ratio was significantly associated with growth restriction in all growth measures at the second week of life, persisting for head circumference up to the fourth week, highlighting the importance of its measurement, as it could be a precocious sign of development risk.


Sujet(s)
Protéines alimentaires , Ration calorique , Humains , Nouveau-né , Femelle , Mâle , Protéines alimentaires/administration et posologie , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Phénomènes physiologiques nutritionnels chez le nourrisson , Prématuré/croissance et développement , Âge gestationnel , Maladies du prématuré/étiologie
17.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 120(1): 17-33, 2024 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734141

RÉSUMÉ

Congenital diarrheas and enteropathies (CODE) are a group of rare, heterogenous, monogenic disorders that lead to chronic diarrhea in infancy. Definitive treatment is rarely available, and supportive treatment is the mainstay. Nutritional management in the form of either specialized formulas, restrictive diet, or parenteral nutrition support in CODE with poor enteral tolerance is the cornerstone of CODE treatment and long-term growth. The evidence to support the use of specific diet regimens and nutritional approaches in most CODE disorders is limited due to the rarity of these diseases and the scant published clinical experience. The goal of this review was to create a comprehensive guide for nutritional management in CODE, based on the currently available literature, disease mechanism, and the PediCODE group experience. Enteral diet management in CODE can be divided into 3 distinct conceptual frameworks: nutrient elimination, nutrient supplementation, and generalized nutrient restriction. Response to nutrient elimination or supplementation can lead to resolution or significant improvement in the chronic diarrhea of CODE and resumption of normal growth. This pattern can be seen in CODE due to carbohydrate malabsorption, defects in fat absorption, and occasionally in electrolyte transport defects. In contrast, general diet restriction is mainly supportive. However, occasionally it allows parenteral nutrition weaning or reduction over time, mainly in enteroendocrine defects and rarely in epithelial trafficking and polarity defects. Further research is required to better elucidate the role of diet in the treatment of CODE and the appropriate diet management for each disease.


Sujet(s)
Nutrition entérale , Humains , Nutrition entérale/méthodes , Diarrhée/diétothérapie , Diarrhée/thérapie , Nourrisson , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Maladies intestinales/diétothérapie , Maladies intestinales/thérapie , Nouveau-né , Compléments alimentaires , Diarrhée du nourrisson/diétothérapie , Diarrhée du nourrisson/thérapie
18.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 120, 2024 May 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702423

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To assess the neurodevelopment outcomes of children younger than 42 months of age with intestinal failure (IF) using prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN) followed by a Pediatric Multidisciplinary Intestinal Rehabilitation Program from a public tertiary hospital in Brazil. METHODS: Bayley III scale was administered in children aged 2 to 42 months with IF and receiving PN for more than 60 days. Composite scores in cognitive, motor, and language domains were analyzed. Developmental delay was defined as a performance 2 standard deviations (SD) below the average at the 3 domains. Association between Bayley III composite scores and clinical variables related to IF were tested. RESULTS: Twenty-four children with median (IQR) age of 17.5 months (9-28.5) were studied, 58.3% were male. Developmental delay was found in 34%, 33% and 27% of the patients in cognitive, motor, and language domains, respectively. There was no significant association between the Bayley-III composite scores and length of hospitalization, prematurity, and number of surgical procedures with anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated impairments in the cognitive, motor and language domains in approximately one-third of young patients with IF on prolonged PN.


Sujet(s)
Insuffisance intestinale , Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Brésil/épidémiologie , Nourrisson , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Nutrition parentérale/statistiques et données numériques , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Incapacités de développement/étiologie , Troubles du développement neurologique/épidémiologie , Troubles du développement neurologique/étiologie
19.
FASEB J ; 38(10): e23699, 2024 May 31.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805158

RÉSUMÉ

This meeting report presents a consensus on the biological aspects of lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition, emphasizing the unanimous support for the integration of lipid emulsions, particularly those containing fish oil, owing to their many potential benefits beyond caloric provision. Lipid emulsions have evolved from simple energy sources to complex formulations designed to improve safety profiles and offer therapeutic benefits. The consensus highlights the critical role of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), notably eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), found in fish oil and other marine oils, for their anti-inflammatory properties, muscle mass preservation, and as precursors to the specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs). SPMs play a significant role in immune modulation, tissue repair, and the active resolution of inflammation without impairing host defense mechanisms. The panel's agreement underscores the importance of incorporating fish oil within clinical practices to facilitate recovery in conditions like surgery, critical illness, or immobility, while cautioning against therapies that might disrupt natural inflammation resolution processes. This consensus not only reaffirms the role of specific lipid components in enhancing patient outcomes, but also suggests a shift towards nutrition-based therapeutic strategies in clinical settings, advocating for the proactive evidence-based use of lipid emulsions enriched with omega-3 PUFAs. Furthermore, we should seek to apply our knowledge concerning DHA, EPA, and their SPM derivatives, to produce more informative randomized controlled trial protocols, thus allowing more authoritative clinical recommendations.


Sujet(s)
Inflammation , Humains , Inflammation/métabolisme , Acides gras omega-3/usage thérapeutique , Acides gras omega-3/métabolisme , Muscles squelettiques/métabolisme , Muscles squelettiques/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Acide eicosapentanoïque/usage thérapeutique , Acide eicosapentanoïque/pharmacologie , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Huiles de poisson/usage thérapeutique , Acide docosahexaénoïque/usage thérapeutique , Émulsion lipidique intraveineuse/usage thérapeutique , Animaux
20.
Curr Oncol ; 31(5): 2748-2757, 2024 05 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785489

RÉSUMÉ

Palliative cancer care patients may live for a long time, but malnutrition worsens the prognosis. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is suitable for replenishing a calorie deficit, but its advantages and tolerance late in the cancer trajectory are debated. We examined symptom development in hospitalized patients with and without PN. A total of 21 palliative cancer care patients receiving PN and 155 palliative cancer care patients not receiving PN during hospitalization in a specialized unit were retrospectively compared. We studied symptom intensity at admission, symptom relief during the hospital stay, and survival. The patients had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, a mean age of 70 years, and their median ECOG performance status was III. Symptom burden at admission was similar in the compared groups. Symptom relief during hospitalization was also similar. However, patients already on PN at admission reported more nausea and patients receiving PN during hospitalization reported better nausea relief compared to patients not receiving this intervention. Overall median survival was less than two months and similar in the compared groups. Based on a limited number of observations and a suboptimal study design, we were not able to demonstrate an increased symptom burden for palliative cancer care patients receiving PN late in the disease trajectory.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs , Soins palliatifs , Nutrition parentérale , Humains , Soins palliatifs/méthodes , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Mâle , Tumeurs/thérapie , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Études rétrospectives
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE