VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation): protocol for a multicenter randomized open-label trial of watchful waiting versus antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework. CONCLUSION: The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.

Efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin for ventilator-associated pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) presents a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Nebulized antibiotics, particularly colistin and tobramycin, are commonly prescribed for VAP patients. However, the appropriateness of using inhaled antibiotics for VAP remains a subject of debate among experts. This study aims to provide updated insights on the efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, COCHRANE Central, and clinical trials databases ( www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) from inception to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting specific inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. These criteria included mechanically ventilated patients diagnosed with VAP, intervention with inhaled Colistin and Tobramycin compared to intravenous antibiotics, and reported outcomes such as clinical cure, microbiological eradication, mortality, or adverse events. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 106 records, from which only seven RCTs fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher likelihood of achieving both clinical and microbiological cure in the groups receiving tobramycin or colistin compared to the control group. The relative risk (RR) for clinical cure was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.45), and for microbiological cure, it was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.31, 2.06). However, there were no significant differences in mortality or the probability of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive inhaled tobramycin or colistin may have a positive impact on the clinical and microbiological cure rates of VAP. However, the overall quality of evidence is low, indicating a high level of uncertainty. These findings underscore the need for further rigorous and well-designed studies to enhance the quality of evidence and provide more robust guidance for clinical decision-making in the management of VAP.

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid to ventilator-associated pneumonia in Colombia.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Due to the increase in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, it is important to consider other more effective and safer alternatives compared to vancomycin. This motivates evaluating whether the use of an apparently more expensive drug such as linezolid can be cost-effective in Colombia. METHODS: A decision tree was used to simulate the results in terms of the cost and proportion of cured patients. In the simulation, patients can receive antibiotic treatment with linezolid (LZD 600 mg IV/12 h) or vancomycin (VCM 15 mg/kg iv/12 h) for 7 days, patients they can experience events adverse (renal failure and thrombocytopenia). The model was analyzed probabilistically, and a value of information analysis was conducted to inform the value of conducting further research to reduce current uncertainties in the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US$5180. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost of LZD versus VCM is US$-517. This suggests that LZD is less costly. The proportion of patients cured when treated with LZD compared with VCM is 53 vs. 43%, respectively. The mean incremental benefit of LZD versus VCM is 10 This position of absolute dominance (LZD has lower costs and higher proportion of clinical cure than no supplementation) is unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. There is uncertainty with a 0.999 probability that LZD is more cost-effective than VCM. Our base-case results were robust to variations in all assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSION: LNZ is a cost-effective strategy for patients, ≥ 18 years of age, with VAP in Colombia- Our study provides evidence that can be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.

Risk factors for developing ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection in patients with severe COVID-19: a multinational, multicentre study, prospective, observational study.

Around one-third of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 develop a severe illness that requires admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In clinical practice, clinicians have learned that patients admitted to the ICU due to severe COVID-19 frequently develop ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTI). This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, the factors associated with VA-LRTI, and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. This was a multicentre, observational cohort study conducted in ten countries in Latin America and Europe. We included patients with confirmed rtPCR for SARS-CoV-2 requiring ICU admission and endotracheal intubation. Only patients with a microbiological and clinical diagnosis of VA-LRTI were included. Multivariate Logistic regression analyses and Random Forest were conducted to determine the risk factors for VA-LRTI and its clinical impact in patients with severe COVID-19. In our study cohort of 3287 patients, VA-LRTI was diagnosed in 28.8% [948/3287]. The cumulative incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was 18.6% [610/3287], followed by ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) 10.3% [338/3287]. A total of 1252 bacteria species were isolated. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.2% [266/1252]), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.1% [239/1252]) and Staphylococcus aureus (15.5% [194/1,252]). The factors independently associated with the development of VA-LRTI were prolonged stay under invasive mechanical ventilation, AKI during ICU stay, and the number of comorbidities. Regarding the clinical impact of VA-LRTI, patients with VAP had an increased risk of hospital mortality (OR [95% CI] of 1.81 [1.40-2.34]), while VAT was not associated with increased hospital mortality (OR [95% CI] of 1.34 [0.98-1.83]). VA-LRTI, often with difficult-to-treat bacteria, is frequent in patients admitted to the ICU due to severe COVID-19 and is associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality. Identifying risk factors for VA-LRTI might allow the early patient diagnosis to improve clinical outcomes.Trial registration: This is a prospective observational study; therefore, no health care interventions were applied to participants, and trial registration is not applicable.

Prevalence, outcomes, and predictors of multidrug-resistant nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections among patients in an ICU.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, outcomes, and predictors of multidrug-resistant nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in patients in an ICU. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study involving patients with nosocomial LRTI (health care-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, or ventilator-associated pneumonia). Data were prospectively collected between 2015 and 2019. The multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRPs) identified in the isolates studied included resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at microbiological diagnosis. RESULTS: During the study period, 267 patients in the ICU were diagnosed with LRTI, microbiological confirmation of LRTI having been obtained in 237. Of these, 146 (62%) had at least one MDRP isolate. Patients infected with MDRP were found to have poorer outcomes than patients infected with susceptible strains, such as prolonged mechanical ventilation (18.0 days vs. 12.0 days; p < 0.001), prolonged ICU length of stay (23.0 days vs.16.0 days; p < 0.001), and higher mortality (73% vs. 53%; p < 0.001) when compared with patients infected with susceptible strains. Hospital length of stay ≥ 5 days (OR = 3.20; 95% CI: 1.39-7.39; p = 0.005) and prolonged use vasoactive drugs (OR = 3.15; 95% CI: 1.42-7.01; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of LRTI caused by MDRPs (LRTI-MDRP). The presence of LRTI-MDRP was found to be an independent predictor of death (OR = 2.311; 95% CI: 1.091-4.894; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of vasoactive drugs and prolonged hospital length of stay were independent predictors of LRTI-MDRP in this population of critically ill patients with very poor outcomes.

Influencia de un panel molecular de reacción de polimerasa en cadena múltiple en el diagnóstico o descarte de neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica en una cohorte chilena de pacientes críticos con COVID-19 / Influence of a multiple polymerase chain reaction panel on the diagnosis or discard of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a Chilean COVID-19 critical patients cohort

INTRODUCCIÓN: La neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica (NAVM) es frecuente en pacientes críticos con COVID-19. Su diagnóstico precoz es fundamental para su pronóstico. OBJETIVO: Demostrar la utilidad del panel FilmArray Pneumo (PFA-P) en la confirmación o descarte de NAVM en estos pacientes. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de 71 pacientes críticos con COVID-19 con sospecha de NAVM en quienes se realizó cultivos y PFA-P para confirmación diagnóstica. Se describen las características clínicas, microbiología y mortalidad. Se define la validez y seguridad de PFA-P. RESULTADOS: El uso de FAP-P y cultivos descartó NAVM en 29 pacientes (40,8%). En 41 pacientes se confirmó NAVM y la mortalidad a 30 días fue 48,8%. Se estudiaron 48 muestras, los cultivos fueron positivos en 30 (62,5%) y se detectaron 33 bacterias, PFA-P detectó 32 de estas 33 bacterias; 37 bacterias fueron detectadas exclusivamente por PFA-P. Las bacterias prevalentes fueron Klebsiella pneumoniae (31,4%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21,4%) y Acinetobacter calcoaceticusbaumannii (14,2%). La sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictor positivo y valor predictor negativo de PFA-P con respecto a cultivos fue 96,9%, 92,5%, 46,4% y 99,8, respectivamente. Un paciente tuvo NAVM por Burkholderia cepacia bacteria no detectada por FAP-P. CONCLUSIONES: La FAP-P es una técnica molecular eficaz para descartar y diagnosticar la NAVM permitiendo una suspensión rápida de los antimicrobianos o un tratamiento dirigido temprano.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is frequent in critical COVID-19 patients. Its early diagnosis is essential for its prognosis. AIM: To demonstrate the usefulness of the FilmArray Pneumo panel (FAP-P) in confirming or ruling out VAP in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective study of 71 critical COVID-19 patients with suspected VAP in whom cultures and FAP-P were performed for diagnostic confirmation. Clinical characteristics, microbiology and mortality are described. The validity and safety of FAP-P is defined. RESULTS: The use of FAP-P and cultures ruled out VAP in 29 patients (40.8%). In 41 patients, VAP was confirmed and the 30-day mortality was 48.8%. Forty-eight samples were studied, the cultures were positive in 30 (62.5%) and 33 bacteria were detected, FAP-P detected 32 of these 33 bacteria; 37 bacteria were exclusively detected by PFA-P. The most prevalent bacteria were Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.4%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.4%) and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii (14.2%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FAP-P with respect to cultures were 96.9%, 92.5%, 46.4% and 99.8%, respectively. One patient had VAP due to Burkholderia cepacia bacteria not detected by FAP-P. CONCLUSIONS: FAP-P is an effective molecular technique to rule out and diagnose VAP, allowing rapid suspension of antibiotics or early targeted treatment.

Polymyxin for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a setting of high carbapenem resistance.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the use of polymyxins for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) at a teaching hospital where carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria are endemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a historical cohort study of patients receiving polymyxins to treat VAP in ICUs at a public university hospital in southern Brazil between January 1, 2017 and January 31, 2018. RESULTS: During the study period, 179 cases of VAP were treated with polymyxins. Of the 179 patients, 158 (88.3%) were classified as having chronic critical illness. Death occurred in 145 cases (81.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that the factors independently associated with mortality were the presence of comorbidities (P<0.001) and the SOFA score of the day of polymyxin prescription (P<0.001). Being a burn patient was a protective factor for mortality (P<0.001). Analysis of the 14-day survival probability showed that mortality was higher among the patients who had sepsis or septic shock at the time of polymyxin prescription (P = 0.028 and P<0.001, respectively). Acinetobacter baumannii was identified as the etiological agent of VAP in 121 cases (67.6%). In our cohort, polymyxin consumption and the incidence density of VAP were quite high. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, comprised primarily of chronically critically ill patients, there was a high prevalence of VAP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria, consistent with healthcare-associated infections in low- and middle-income countries. Presence of comorbidities and the SOFA score at the time of polymyxin prescription were predictors of mortality in this cohort. Despite aggressive antimicrobial treatment, mortality was high, stressing the need for antibiotic stewardship.

Acinetobacter etiology respiratory tract infections associated with mechanical ventilation: what impacts on the prognosis? A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Acinetobacter species treatment often represents a challenge. The main objective of this study is identify predictors of ICU mortality in patients submitted to mechanical ventilation (MV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Patients with MV > 48 h who developed a respiratory tract positive culture for Acinetobacter were included, and distinguished among colonized, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) patients. Primary outcome was ICU mortality. RESULTS: 153 patients were in MV and presented positive culture for Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumanii complex, 70 of them with VAP, 59 with VAT and 24 patients were colonized. The factors related to ICU mortality were VAP (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5) and shock at the time of diagnosis (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-2.3). In multivariate analysis, only SOFA score at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09) was related with ICU mortality. A paired-matched analysis was performed to assess effect of dual therapy on outcomes, and no effect was found in terms of clinical cure, ICU or hospital mortality or duration of antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Previous comorbidities and degree of associated organic injury seem to be more important factors in the prognosis than double antibiotic therapy in patients with Acinetobacter-related respiratory infection.

Fosfomycin in severe infections due to genetically distinct pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms: synergy with meropenem.

Background: In vitro and clinical studies using parenteral fosfomycin have suggested the possibility of using this drug against infections caused by MDR microorganisms. The aim of this study was to describe a case series of patients treated with fosfomycin who had severe infections caused by pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Methods: We describe a prospective series of cases of hospitalized patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria resistant to ß-lactams and colistin, treated with 16 g of fosfomycin daily for 10-14 days. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and synergism of fosfomycin with meropenem. We tested for resistance genes and performed typing using PCR and WGS. Results: Thirteen patients received fosfomycin (seven immunosuppressed); they had bloodstream infections (n = 11; 85%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 1; 8%) and surgical site infection (n = 1; 8%), caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 9), Serratia marcescens (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1). Overall, eight (62%) patients were cured. Using time-kill assays, synergism between fosfomycin and meropenem occurred in 9 (82%) of 11 isolates. Typing demonstrated that K. pneumoniae were polyclonal. Eight patients (62%) had possible adverse events, but therapy was not discontinued. Conclusions: Fosfomycin may be safe and effective against infections caused by pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms with different antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and there seems to be synergism with meropenem.

Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo de la neumonía intrahospitalaria y neumonía asociada a ventilador mecánico / Clinical practice guideline for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia

Brindar recomendaciones basadas en evidencia para el manejo de la neumonía Intrahospitalaria y neumonía asociada a ventilador mecánico.

Antibiotic therapy in ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: a literature review. / Terapêutica antibiótica na traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica: uma revisão da literatura.

The concept of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is controversial; its definition is not unanimously accepted and often overlaps with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis has an incidence similar to that of ventilator-associated pneumonia, with a high prevalence of isolated multiresistant agents, resulting in an increase in the time of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization but without an impact on mortality. The performance of quantitative cultures may allow better diagnostic definition of tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation, possibly avoiding the overdiagnosis of this condition. One of the major difficulties in differentiating between ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia is the exclusion of a pulmonary infiltrate by chest radiography; thoracic computed tomography, thoracic ultrasonography, or invasive specimen collection may also be required. The institution of systemic antibiotic therapy does not improve the clinical impact of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, particularly in reducing time of mechanical ventilation, hospitalization or mortality, despite the possible reduced progression to ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, there are doubts regarding the methodology used. Thus, considering the high prevalence of tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation, routine treatment of this condition would result in high antibiotic usage without clear benefits. However, we suggest the institution of antibiotic therapy in patients with tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation and septic shock and/or worsening of oxygenation, and other auxiliary diagnostic tests should be simultaneously performed to exclude ventilator-associated pneumonia. This review provides a better understanding of the differentiation between tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation and pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation, which can significantly decrease the use of antibiotics in critically ventilated patients.

[Pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation. Update and recommendations inter- Societies SADI-SATI]. / Neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica. Actualización y recomendaciones inter-sociedades, Sociedad Argentina de Infectología - Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva.

Representatives of the Argentine Society of Infectious Diseases (SADI) and the Argentine Society of Intensive Therapy (SATI) worked together on the development of specific recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The methodology used was the analysis of the literature published in the last 15 years, complemented with the opinion of experts and local data. This document aims to offer basic tools to optimize diagnosis based on clinical and microbiological criteria, orientation in empirical and targeted antibiotic schemes, news on posology and administration of antibiotics in critical patients and to promote effective measures to reduce the risk of VAP. It also offers a diagnostic and treatment algorithm and considerations on inhaled antibiotics. The joint work of both societies -infectious diseases and intensive care- highlights the concern for the management of VAP and the importance of ensuring improvement in daily practices. This guideline established recommendations to optimize the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of VAP in order to reduce morbidity and mortality, days of hospitalization, costs and resistance to antibiotics due to misuse of antimicrobials.

Neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica: Actualización y recomendaciones inter-sociedades, Sociedad Argentina de infectología - Sociedad Argentina de terapia intensiva / Pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation. Update and recommendations inter- Societies SADI-SATI

Representantes de la Sociedad Argentina de Infectología (SADI) y la Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva (SATI) se unieron para trabajar en la elaboración de recomendaciones de diagnóstico, tratamiento y prevención de la neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica (NAVM). La metodología utilizada fue el análisis de la bibliografía publicada en los últimos 15 años, complementada con la opinión de expertos y los datos locales. En este documento se pretende ofrecer herramientas básicas de optimización del diagnóstico en base a criterios clínicos y microbiológicos, orientación en los esquemas antibióticos empíricos y dirigidos, novedades en posología y administración de antibióticos en pacientes críticos y promocionar las medidas efectivas para reducir el riesgo de NAVM. Asimismo, ofrece un algoritmo de diagnóstico y tratamiento y consideraciones sobre antibióticos inhalados. El trabajo conjunto de ambas sociedades, infectólogos y terapistas, pone en evidencia la preocupación por el manejo de la NAVM y la importancia de velar por la mejora en las prácticas cotidianas. A través de esta recomendación se establecen pautas locales para optimizar el diagnóstico, tratamiento y prevención de la NAVM con el objeto de disminuir la morbimortalidad, días de internación, costos y resistencia a antibióticos debida al mal uso de los antimicrobianos.

Representatives of the Argentine Society of Infectious Diseases (SADI) and the Argentine Society of Intensive Therapy (SATI) worked together on the development of specific recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The methodology used was the analysis of the literature published in the last 15 years, complemented with the opinion of experts and local data. This document aims to offer basic tools to optimize diagnosis based on clinical and microbiological criteria, orientation in empirical and targeted antibiotic schemes, news on posology and administration of antibiotics in critical patients and to promote effective measures to reduce the risk of VAP. It also offers a diagnostic and treatment algorithm and considerations on inhaled antibiotics. The joint work of both societies -infectious diseases and intensive care- highlights the concern for the management of VAP and the importance of ensuring improvement in daily practices. This guideline established recommendations to optimize the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of VAP in order to reduce morbidity and mortality, days of hospitalization, costs and resistance to antibiotics due to misuse of antimicrobials.

Terapêutica antibiótica na traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica: uma revisão da literatura / Antibiotic therapy in ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: a literature review

RESUMO O conceito de traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica é controverso, e sua definição não é unanimemente aceita, sobrepondo-se, muitas vezes, à da pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica. A traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica tem incidência semelhante à da pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica, com elevada prevalência de agentes multirresistentes isolados, condicionando um aumento do tempo de ventilação mecânica e de internação, ainda que sem impacto na mortalidade. A realização de culturas quantitativas pode permitir melhor definição diagnóstica da traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica, possivelmente evitando o sobrediagnóstico desta entidade. Uma das maiores dificuldades na diferenciação entre traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica e pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica reside na exclusão de um infiltrado pulmonar por meio da radiografia do tórax; também podem ser necessárias a tomografia computadorizada torácica, a ultrassonografia torácica ou ainda a colheita de amostras invasivas. A instituição de terapêutica antibiótica sistêmica não demonstrou melhorar o impacto clínico da traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica, nomeadamente na redução do tempo de ventilação mecânica, de internação ou mortalidade, apesar da eventual menor progressão para pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica, ainda que existam dúvidas relativas à metodologia utilizada. Deste modo, considerando a elevada prevalência da traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica, o tratamento desta entidade, por rotina, resultaria em elevada prescrição antibiótica sem benefícios claros. No entanto, sugerimos a instituição de terapêutica antibiótica em doentes com traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica e choque séptico e/ou agravamento da oxigenação, devendo ser realizados simultaneamente outros exames auxiliares de diagnóstico para exclusão da pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica. Após esta revisão da literatura, entendemos que uma melhor diferenciação entre traqueobronquite associada à ventilação mecânica e pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica pode diminuir, de forma significativa, a utilização de antibióticos em doentes críticos ventilados.

ABSTRACT The concept of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is controversial; its definition is not unanimously accepted and often overlaps with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis has an incidence similar to that of ventilator-associated pneumonia, with a high prevalence of isolated multiresistant agents, resulting in an increase in the time of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization but without an impact on mortality. The performance of quantitative cultures may allow better diagnostic definition of tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation, possibly avoiding the overdiagnosis of this condition. One of the major difficulties in differentiating between ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia is the exclusion of a pulmonary infiltrate by chest radiography; thoracic computed tomography, thoracic ultrasonography, or invasive specimen collection may also be required. The institution of systemic antibiotic therapy does not improve the clinical impact of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, particularly in reducing time of mechanical ventilation, hospitalization or mortality, despite the possible reduced progression to ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, there are doubts regarding the methodology used. Thus, considering the high prevalence of tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation, routine treatment of this condition would result in high antibiotic usage without clear benefits. However, we suggest the institution of antibiotic therapy in patients with tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation and septic shock and/or worsening of oxygenation, and other auxiliary diagnostic tests should be simultaneously performed to exclude ventilator-associated pneumonia. This review provides a better understanding of the differentiation between tracheobronchitis associated with mechanical ventilation and pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation, which can significantly decrease the use of antibiotics in critically ventilated patients.

Algoritmo para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica artificial / Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia associated with artificial mechanical ventilation

Introducción: la neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica constituye un tema de actualidad por su frecuencia, gravedad e implicaciones etiológicas y terapéuticas.Objetivo: evaluar los resultados de la aplicación de un algoritmo para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital General Provincial Docente Dr. Antonio Luaces Iraola de la provincia Ciego de Ávila.Método: se realizó un estudio preexperimental en el Hospital General Provincial Docente Dr. Antonio Luaces Iraola en la provincia Ciego de Ávila, desde abril de 2012 a diciembre de 2014 en 15 pacientes ventilados según los criterios de la Sociedad Americana del Tórax. Los datos fueron obtenidos de los expedientes clínicos.Resultados: la frecuencia de aparición de neumonía asociada a la ventilación durante el periodo en estudio fue de 11,7 por ciento, se encontraron frecuencias similares para ambos sexos, con una incidencia mayor en el grupo de edad de 41 a 50 años. La utilización previa de antibióticos y la profilaxis del sangrado digestivo fueron los principales factores de riesgo encontrados en estos pacientes. Se diagnosticó con mayor frecuencia la neumonía asociada a la ventilación de aparición tardía. El germen con más frecuencia aislado fue el Acinetobacter, en los pacientes con neumonía tardía. Los pacientes con adherencia al algoritmo tuvieron mayor sobrevivencia al egreso que aquellos en los que no hubo adherencia al mismo.Conclusiones: la adherencia al algoritmo propuesto mejora la sobrevivencia de los pacientes(AU)

Introduction: pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation is a topical issue due to its frequency, severity and its etiological and therapeutic implications. Objective: to evaluate the results of the application of an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit of the General Provincial Teaching Hospital Dr. Antonio Luaces Iraola from Ciego de Ávila province. Method: a pre-experimental study was carried out in the General Provincial Teaching Hospital Dr. Antonio Luaces Iraola in Ciego de Ávila province, from April 2012 to December 2014 in 15 patients ventilated according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society. Data were obtained from the clinical records.Results: the frequency of occurrence of pneumonia associated with ventilation during the study period was 11,7 percent, similar frequencies were found for both sexes, with a higher incidence in the age group of 41 to 50 years. The previous use of antibiotics and the prophylaxis of digestive bleeding were the main risk factors found in these patients. The pneumonia associated with late-onset ventilation was diagnosed more frequently. The most frequently isolated germ was Acinetobacter, in patients with late pneumonia. The patients with adherence to the algorithm had greater survival at discharge than those in whom there was no adherence to it. Conclusions: adherence to the proposed algorithm improves the survival of patients(AU)

Costo de las neumonías asociadas a la ventilación mecánica en pacientes adultos en un hospital general en Chile / Cost evaluation of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult patients in a general hospital in Chile

Resumen Introducción: La neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica (NAVM) es un evento adverso que aumenta la morbi-mortalidad y costos. Genera días adicionales de hospitalización y de procedimientos diagnósticos y terapéuticos para su tratamiento. No existen datos actualizados nacionales respecto al exceso de costos por NAVM. Objetivo: Dimensionar el costo de las NAVM en un hospital general de la Región Metropolitana. Pacientes y Métodos: Aplicación del protocolo caso-control de costos de infecciones intrahospitalarias de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) y cálculo directo de gasto en exceso por evento de NAVM. Se comparó el exceso de días de hospitalización, de antimicrobianos en dosis diaria definida (DDD) y de cultivos. Resultados: Se recolectaron 18 casos de NAVM entre los años 2012 y 2015 en pacientes adultos. Se seleccionaron 18 controles pareados por edad y género. Se observó una mayor estadía promedio de 6,1 días en los casos (p < 0,05), una mayor prescripción de antimicrobianos (diferencia promedio de 11,7 DDD, sin significancia estadística) y un exceso de solicitud de cultivos con una diferencia promedio de 3,2 (p < 0,05). El costo unitario por NAVM fue de 4.475 USD. Conclusiones: Los eventos de NAVM generan una mayor estadía hospitalaria, consumo de recursos diagnósticos y terapéuticos.

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an adverse event that increases morbidity, mortality and costs due to a prolonged stay and requirement of microbiological studies and antimicrobial therapy. There is not recent data of VAP costs in Chile. Aim: To evaluate additional costs in adult patients with VAP compared to controls in a general hospital in the Metropolitan Area. Patients and Methods: Use of the PAHO paired casecontrol protocol for cost evaluation associated to nosocomial infections and estimation of cost in excess per VAP event. Length of stay (LOS) in excess, antimicrobial consumption in daily-defined doses (DDD), and number of microbiological studies were compared between both groups. Results: From 2012 to 2015, 18 patients with VAP events were identified with their respective controls. LOS exceeded 6.1 days on average among patients with VAP respect to controls (p < 0.05). DDD was higher among patients with VAP (difference 11.7 DDD) as well as number of cultures (3.2 higher on average, p < 0.05). Cost in excess per VAP event reached 4,475 USD. Conclusions: In our Centre, VAP events are associated to a higher LOS, antimicrobial consumption and microbiological studies.