Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 1.827
Filtrer
1.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241277408, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39245900

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: Financial strain has important consequences for patients, providers, and health care systems. However, there is currently no gold standard measure to screen for financial strain. This study compared the performance of 3 single-item screeners using a composite measure of financial strain as a "gold standard." METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of unweighted data from a 2021 survey of Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan members comparing the percentages of adults who experienced financial strain based on 3 general single-item screeners, a screener specific to medical and dental health care use, and a composite financial strain measure. The study sample was comprised of 2734 non-Medicaid insured adults who answered all financial strain questions. Kappa statistics evaluating agreement of the 3 general screeners with the composite measure were calculated for the sample overall, by age group, and within age group, by 4 levels of income and 4 racial/ethnic subgroups. RESULTS: Among 947 adults aged 35 to 65, 30.7% had just enough money or not enough money to make ends meet, 23.3% had a somewhat hard or hard time paying for basics, 18.8% had trouble paying for ≥1 type of expense, 20.5% had delayed/used less medical/dental care, and 41.5% had experienced financial strain based on the composite measure. Among 1787 adults aged 66 to 85, the percentages who screened positive on these measures were 22.7%, 19.4%, 12.9%, 19.8%, and 34.4%, respectively. Across the sample, by income categories and racial/ethnic groups, the making ends meet screener identified higher percentages of adults experiencing financial strain and performed better when compared with the composite measure than the hard to pay for the very basics and trouble paying for expenses screeners. Overall, substantial decreases in the percentages of adults who screened positive on the financial strain measures were seen as level of income increased. Within income categories, middle-aged adults were more likely than older adults to have experienced financial strain based on the composite and general single-item screeners. CONCLUSIONS: As social risk screening becomes part of the standard of care, it will be important to assess how well different brief screeners for financial strain perform with diverse patient populations.


Sujet(s)
Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Stress financier , Humains , Adulte , Études transversales , Adulte d'âge moyen , Femelle , Mâle , Californie , Sujet âgé , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Revenu/statistiques et données numériques
2.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(9): 1263-1273, 2024 09.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226512

RÉSUMÉ

Bundled payments are increasingly used globally to move health care delivery in a value-based direction. However, evidence remains scant in key clinical areas. We evaluated bundled payments for maternity care in the Netherlands during the period 2016-18. We used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design to measure the association between the bundled payment model and changes in key clinical and economic outcomes. Bundled payments were associated with an increase in outpatient, midwife-led births and a reduction in in-hospital, obstetrician-led births, along with changes in the use of labor inductions and planned versus emergency cesarean deliveries. Total spending on maternity care decreased by US$328 (5 percent) per pregnancy. No changes in maternal or neonatal health outcomes were observed. Several policy lessons emerged. First, bundled payments appeared to help affect providers' behavior in the maternity care setting. Second, bundled payments seemed to exert heterogeneous effects across participating maternity care networks, as the same financial incentive translated into different changes in clinical practices and outcomes. Third, alternative payment models should be designed with clear goals and definitions of success to guide evaluation and implementation.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé maternelle , Pays-Bas , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Services de santé maternelle/économie , Bouquets de soins des patients/économie , Accouchement (procédure)/économie , Adulte , Mécanismes de remboursement , Politique de santé , Césarienne/économie , Césarienne/statistiques et données numériques , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie
5.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(7): e242187, 2024 Jul 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028653

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Most dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries are enrolled in bifurcated insurance programs that pay for different components of care. Therefore, policymakers are prioritizing expansion of integrated care plans (ICPs) that manage both Medicare and Medicaid benefits and spending. Objective: To review evidence of the association between ICPs and health care spending, quality, utilization, and patient outcomes among dual-eligible beneficiaries. Evidence Review: A search was conducted of PubMed/MEDLINE (January 1, 2010, through November 1, 2023) and Google Scholar (January 1, 2010, through October 1, 2023) and augmented with reports from US federal and state government websites. Three categories of ICPs were evaluated: Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), Medicare-Medicaid Plans (MMPs), and Fully Integrated Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (FIDE-SNPs) and related models aligning Medicare and Medicaid coverage. The review included studies that evaluated beneficiaries dually eligible for and enrolled in full Medicaid; compared an ICP to a nonintegrated arrangement; and evaluated utilization, spending, care coordination, patient experience, or health for 100 or more beneficiaries. Findings: In all, 26 ICP evaluations met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 5 of PACE, 13 of MMPs, and 8 of FIDE-SNPs and other aligned models. Evidence generally showed associated reductions in long-term nursing home stays in PACE (3 of 4 studies) and FIDE-SNPs and related aligned models (3 of 5 studies) but was mixed in evaluations of MMPs. Four of 9 studies of MMPs and 2 of 3 studies of FIDE-SNPs found higher outpatient use, although other studies showed no difference. Evidence on Medicaid spending was limited, whereas 8 of 10 studies of MMPs showed an association between these plans and higher Medicare spending. Evidence was mixed or inconclusive regarding care coordination and hospitalizations, and it was insufficient to evaluate patient satisfaction, health, and outcomes in beneficiary subgroups (eg, those with serious mental illness). Furthermore, studies had limited ability to control for bias from unmeasured differences between enrollees of ICPs compared with nonintegrated models. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review found variability and gaps in evidence regarding ICPs and spending, quality, utilization, and outcomes. Studies found some ICPs were associated with reductions in long-term nursing home admissions, and several identified increases in outpatient care. However, MMPs were primarily associated with higher Medicare spending. Evidence for other outcomes was limited or inconclusive. Research addressing these evidence gaps is needed to guide ongoing efforts to integrate coverage and care for dual-eligible beneficiaries.


Sujet(s)
Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Dépenses de santé , Medicaid (USA) , Medicare (USA) , États-Unis , Humains , Medicare (USA)/économie , Dépenses de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Medicaid (USA)/économie , Medicaid (USA)/statistiques et données numériques , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Qualité des soins de santé/économie
6.
Lancet Glob Health ; 12(8): e1331-e1342, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030063

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care (BIGPIC) trial in rural Kenya showed that integrating usual care with group medical visits or microfinance interventions reduced systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in participants. We aimed to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of three BIGPIC interventions for a modelled cohort and by sex, as well as the cost of implementing these interventions. METHODS: For this analysis, we used data collected during the BIGPIC trial, a four-group, cluster-randomised trial conducted in the western Kenyan catchment area of the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare. BIGPIC enrolled participants from 24 rural health facilities in rural western Kenya aged 35 years or older with either increased blood pressure or diabetes. Participants were assigned to receive either usual care, group medical visits, microfinance, or a combination of group medical visits and microfinance (GMV-MF). Our model estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of the three BIGPIC interventions via seven health states (ie, a hypertensive state, five chronic cardiovascular-disease states, and a death state) by simulating transitions between health states for a hypothetical cohort of individuals with hypertension on the basis of QRISK3 scores. In every cycle, participants accrued costs and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with their health state. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for the entire modelled cohort and by sex by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental effectiveness of the next most expensive intervention. The main outcome of this analysis was ICERs for each intervention evaluated. This analysis is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02501746). FINDINGS: Between Feb 6, 2017, and Dec 29, 2019, 2890 people were recruited to the BIGPIC trial. 2020 (69·9%) of 2890 participants were female and 870 (30·1%) were male. At baseline, mean QRISK3 score was 11·5 (95% CI 11·1-11·9) for the trial population, 11·9 (11·5-12·2) for male participants, and 11·3 (11·0-11·6) for female participants. For the population of Kenya, group medical visits were estimated to cost US$7 more per individual than usual care and result in 0·005 more DALYs averted (ICER $1455 per DALY averted). Microfinance was estimated to cost $19 more than group medical visits but was only estimated to avert 0·001 more DALYs. Relative to group medical visits, GMV-MF was estimated to cost $29 more and avert 0·009 more DALYs ($3235 per DALY averted). Relative to usual care, GMV-MF was estimated to cost $37 more and avert 0·014 more DALYs ($2601 per DALY averted). In the first year of the intervention, usual care was estimated to be the least expensive intervention to implement ($87 per participant; $10 238 per health-facility catchment area [HFCA]), then group medical visits ($99 per participant; $12 268 per HFCA), then microfinance ($120 per participant; $14 172 per HFCA), with GMV-MF estimated to be the most expensive intervention to implement ($139 per participant; $16 913 per HFCA). INTERPRETATION: Group medical visits and GMV-MF were estimated to be cost-effective strategies to improve blood-pressure control in rural Kenya. However, which intervention to pursue depends on resource availability. Policy makers should consider these factors, in addition to sex differences in programme effectiveness, when selecting optimal implementation strategies. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.


Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Hypertension artérielle , Humains , Kenya , Mâle , Femelle , Hypertension artérielle/thérapie , Hypertension artérielle/économie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Population rurale , Sujet âgé , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie
7.
Psychiatry Res ; 339: 116007, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865905

RÉSUMÉ

Stepped, evidence-based and integrated care service models have the potential to be used as a reference for mental health services. RECOVER aimed to evaluate cost savings, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of such a model within a two arm, assessor- and data analysist-blinded RCT in Hamburg, Germany. Participants aged 16-79 years with mental disorders were randomly assigned either to RECOVER or treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcomes comprised costs, effectiveness (combined symptoms, functioning, quality of life), and cost-effectiveness, hierarchically ordered. Outcomes were evaluated according to the ITT principle, group differences regarding costs with adjusted generalized linear models, effectiveness with ANCOVA models, and cost-effectiveness with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). Between 1/1/2018 and 12/31/2020, n = 891 were finally included (n = 477 in RECOVER, n = 444 in TAU). RECOVER was associated with significantly lower annual total costs (-22 %), health and social care costs (-25 %) and hospital costs (-50 %). Effectiveness analyses showed a significantly better outcome for RECOVER with the fully imputed data . The CEACs descriptively demonstrated that RECOVER was cost-effective with a probability of >95 %. Treatment in RECOVER resulted in substantial cost reductions with better cost-effectiveness. RECOVER can be recommended as a reference model for comprehensive and integrated mental health services.


Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Troubles mentaux , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Femelle , Mâle , Sujet âgé , Adolescent , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/économie , Jeune adulte , Allemagne , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Services de santé mentale/économie , Qualité de vie , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques ,
8.
Public Health ; 234: 33-36, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943833

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: The cost-of-living crisis is a public health threat; however, the effects of the rising cost of living were not a policy priority for integrated care systems (ICSs) in early 2022. At the request of ICS leaders, the National Health Service (NHS) Confederation created an online cost-of-living hub in October 2022 to raise awareness of the consequences of the rising cost of living among ICS policymakers and support systems in mitigating these effects. This study aims to investigate the impact of this hub. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: To quantify hub utilisation, the hub viewing figures collected by the NHS Confederation website were analysed. A thematic analysis was performed to characterise how cost-of-living features in integrated care strategies, and the results compared to information published on the hub. RESULTS: The pages that comprise the hub were well engaged with, having between 2736 and 6161 views. Alongside this, the impacts of the rising cost of living feature extensively in integrated care strategies, being discussed in 32 out of 37 strategies across four contexts: health, communities, economic, and environmental. The significant majority of subthemes reflect points made by the hub. CONCLUSION: These results suggest the hub may have raised awareness about the impacts of-and possible responses to-the cost-of-living crisis among ICS policymakers. This may act as an impetus and guide for future public health interventions using policy and practice hubs. Furthermore, the discussion of cost-of-living across a range of contexts implies ICSs are engendering a collaborative, system-wide approach to tackling complex local issues.


Sujet(s)
Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Politique de santé , Médecine d'État , Humains , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Médecine d'État/économie , Royaume-Uni
9.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 43: 101009, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861787

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the "Value-Based Healthcare" concept of an integrated palliative care (PC) program in Bogotá, Colombia, through the measurement of health outcomes and care costs in the last 3 months of life. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥18 years old who died in 2020 due to medical conditions amenable to PC. The measured health outcomes included pain, wellbeing, comfort, quality of life (QOL), and satisfaction. We analyzed the behavior of overall care costs during the last 3 months of the patients' lives and controlled for the effect of exposure to the program, considering the disease type and insurance coverage, using a linear regression model, nearest-neighbor matching, and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Among patients exposed to the program, the mean pain score was 2.1/10 (± 1.3) and wellbeing was rated at 3.5/10 (± 1.0), comfort at 1.6/24 (± 1.3), QOL at 3.6/5.0 (± 0.17), and satisfaction at 9.3/100 (± 0.15). The positive changes in these scores were greater for patients who remained in the program for over 3 months. Cost reduction was demonstrated in the last 90 days of life, with statistically significant and chronologically progressive savings during the last 30 days of life exceeding 5 million pesos per patient (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the success of PC in reducing pain, improving wellbeing and QOL, providing comfort, and ensuring high levels of satisfaction. Moreover, PC is an effective value-based healthcare strategy and can significantly enhance the efficiency of healthcare services by reducing end-of-life healthcare costs.


Sujet(s)
Soins palliatifs , Qualité de vie , Humains , Colombie , Soins palliatifs/méthodes , Soins palliatifs/économie , Soins palliatifs/normes , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Qualité de vie/psychologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/normes , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Coûts des soins de santé/normes , Adulte , Satisfaction des patients , Soins de santé basés sur la valeur
10.
Glob Health Sci Pract ; 12(3)2024 06 27.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901972

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Enabling community health workers (CHWs) to treat acute malnutrition improves treatment access and coverage. However, data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of this approach is limited. We aimed to cost the treatment at scale and determine the cost-effectiveness of different levels of supervision and technical support. METHODS: This economic evaluation was part of a prospective nonrandomized community intervention study in 3 districts in Mali examining the impact of different levels of CHW and health center supervision and support on treatment outcomes for children with severe acute malnutrition. Treatment admission and outcome data were extracted from the records of 120 participating health centers and 169 CHW sites. Cost data were collected from accountancy records and through key informant interviews. Results were presented as cost per child treated and cured. Modeled scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine how cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness estimates change in an equal scale scenario and/or if the supervision had been done by government staff. RESULTS: In the observed scenario, with an unequal number of children, the average cost per child treated was US$203.40 in Bafoulabé where a basic level of supervision and support was provided, US$279.90 in Kayes with a medium level of supervision, and US$253.9 in Kita with the highest level of supervision. Costs per child cured were US$303.90 in Bafoulabé, US$324.90 in Kayes, and US$311.80 in Kita, with overlapping uncertainty ranges. CONCLUSION: Additional supervision has the potential to be a cost-effective strategy if supervision costs are reduced without compromising the quality of supervision. Further research should aim to better adapt the supervision model and associated tools to the context and investigate where efficiencies can be made in its delivery.


Sujet(s)
Prise en charge personnalisée du patient , Agents de santé communautaire , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Humains , Mali , Agents de santé communautaire/économie , Études prospectives , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Nourrisson , Prise en charge personnalisée du patient/organisation et administration , Prise en charge personnalisée du patient/économie , Services de santé communautaires/économie , Services de santé communautaires/organisation et administration , Malnutrition aigüe sévère/thérapie , Malnutrition aigüe sévère/économie , Femelle , Mâle , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Troubles nutritionnels de l'enfant/thérapie , Troubles nutritionnels de l'enfant/économie
11.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(8): 1461-1467, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802556

RÉSUMÉ

The refracture rate after major trauma is approximately half (57%) the refracture rate after a minimal trauma injury. Extending Fracture Liaison Service activity to include major trauma patients creates significant additional direct cost, but remains essentially cost neutral if notional savings through refracture risk reduction are taken into account. PURPOSE: To compare the 3-year refracture rate following minimal trauma (MT) and non-minimal trauma (non-MT) injuries and evaluate the cost of extending fracture liaison service (FLS) operations to non-MT presentations. METHODS: Patients aged 50, or above presenting to the John Hunter Hospital with a fracture in calendar year 2018 were identified through the Integrated Patient Management System (IPMS) of the Hunter New England Health Service's (HNEHS), and re-presentation to any HNEHS facility over the following 3 years monitored. The refracture rate of MT and non-MT presentations was compared and analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The cost of including non-MT patients was estimated through the use of a previously conducted micro-costing analysis. The operational fidelity of the FLS to the previous estimate was confirmed by comparing the 3-year refracture rate of MT presentations in the two studies. RESULTS: The 3-year refracture rate following a MT injury was 8% and after non-MT injury 4.5%. Extension of FLS activities to include non-MT patients in 2022 would have cost an additional $198,326 AUD with a notional loss/saving of $ - 26,625/ + 26,913 AUD through refracture risk reduction. No clinically available characteristic at presentation predictive of increased refracture risk was identified. CONCLUSION: The 3-year refracture after a non-MT injury is about half (57%) that of the refracture rate after a MT injury. Extending FLS activity to non-MT patients incurs a significant additional direct cost but remains cost neutral if notional savings gained through reduction in refracture risk are taken into account.


Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Fractures ostéoporotiques , Récidive , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Fractures ostéoporotiques/économie , Fractures ostéoporotiques/prévention et contrôle , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Nouvelle-Angleterre , Prévention secondaire/économie , Prévention secondaire/organisation et administration
12.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(5): 968-973, 2024 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666613

RÉSUMÉ

We conducted a large surveillance study among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system in Pacific Northwest of the United States to estimate medical costs attributable to medically attended acute gastroenteritis (MAAGE) on the day care was sought and during 30-day follow-up. We used multivariable regression to compare costs of MAAGE and non-MAAGE cases matched on age, gender, and index time. Differences accounted for confounders, including race, ethnicity, and history of chronic underlying conditions. Analyses included 73,140 MAAGE episodes from adults and 18,617 from children who were Kaiser Permanente Northwest members during 2014-2016. Total costs were higher for MAAGE cases relative to non-MAAGE comparators as were costs on the day care was sought and costs during follow-up. Costs of MAAGE are substantial relative to the cost of usual-care medical services, and much of the burden accrues during short-term follow-up.


Sujet(s)
Coûts indirects de la maladie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Gastroentérite , Coûts des soins de santé , Humains , Gastroentérite/épidémiologie , Gastroentérite/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Adulte d'âge moyen , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Nourrisson , Sujet âgé , Maladie aigüe/épidémiologie , Histoire du 21ème siècle
13.
Value Health ; 27(6): 713-720, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462222

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: To improve access, the VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 mandated a 2-year study of medical scribes in Veterans Health Administration specialty clinics and emergency departments. Medical scribes are employed in clinical settings with the goals of increasing provider productivity and satisfaction by minimizing physicians' documentation burden. Our objective is to quantify the economic outcomes of the MISSION Act scribes trial. METHODS: A cluster-randomized trial was designed with 12 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers randomized into the intervention. We estimated the total cost of the trial, cost per scribe-year, and projected cost of hiring additional physicians to achieve the observed scribe productivity benefits in relative value units and visits per full-time-equivalent over the 2-year intervention period (June 30, 2020 to July 1, 2022). RESULTS: The estimated cost of the trial was $4.6 million, below the Congressional Budget Office estimate of $5 million. A full-time scribe-year cost approximately $74 600 through contracting and $62 900 through VA hiring. Randomization into the trial led to an approximate 30% increase in productivity in cardiology and 20% in orthopedics. The projected incremental cost of using additional physicians instead of scribes to achieve the same productivity benefits was nearly $1.7 million more, or 75% higher, than the observed cost of scribes in cardiology and orthopedics. CONCLUSIONS: As the largest randomized trial of scribes to date, the MISSION Act scribes trial provides important evidence on the costs and benefits of scribes. Improving productivity enhances access and scribes may give VA a new tool to improve productivity in specialty care at a lower cost than hiring additional providers.


Sujet(s)
Efficacité fonctionnement , Department of Veterans Affairs (USA) , États-Unis , Humains , Documentation/économie , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Rendement , Hôpitaux des anciens combattants/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration
14.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 45(1): 443-464, 2024 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134403

RÉSUMÉ

In recent years, health care policy makers have focused increasingly on addressing social drivers of health as a strategy for improving health and health equity. Impacts of social, economic, and environmental conditions on health are well established. However, less is known about the implementation and impact of approaches used by health care providers and payers to address social drivers of health in clinical settings. This article reviews current efforts by US health care organizations and public payers such as Medicaid and Medicare to address social drivers of health at the individual and community levels. We summarize the limited available evidence regarding intervention impacts on health care utilization, costs, and integration of care and identify key lessons learned from current implementation efforts.


Sujet(s)
Déterminants sociaux de la santé , Humains , États-Unis , Medicare (USA)/économie , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Medicaid (USA)/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie
15.
Med Care Res Rev ; 81(3): 259-270, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38156763

RÉSUMÉ

Pediatric value-based payment reform has been hindered by limited return on investment (ROI) for child-focused measures and the accrual of financial benefits to non-health care sectors. States participating in the federally-funded Integrated Care for Kids (InCK) models are required to design child-centered alternative payment models (APMs) for Medicaid-enrolled children. The North Carolina InCK pediatric APM launched in January 2023 and includes innovative measures focused on school readiness and social needs. We interviewed experts at NC Medicaid managed care organizations, NC Medicaid, and actuaries with pediatric value-based payment experience to assess the NC InCK APM design process and develop strategies for future child-focused value-based payment reform. Key principles emerging from conversations included: accounting for payer priorities and readiness to implement measures; impact of data uncertainty on investment in novel measures; misalignment of a short-term ROI framework with whole child health measures; and state levers like mandates and financial incentives to promote implementation.


Sujet(s)
Medicaid (USA) , Caroline du Nord , Humains , Enfant , Medicaid (USA)/économie , États-Unis , Santé de l'enfant/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Services de santé pour enfants/économie , Mécanismes de remboursement
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 705, 2023 Jun 29.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386431

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: In 2017, Liberia became one of the first countries in the African region to develop and implement a national strategy for integrated case management of Neglected Tropical Diseases (CM-NTDs), specifically Buruli ulcer, leprosy, lymphatic filariasis morbidities, and yaws. Implementing this plan moves the NTD program from many countries' fragmented (vertical) disease management. This study explores to what extent an integrated approach offers a cost-effective investment for national health systems. METHODS: This study is a mixed-method economic evaluation that explores the cost-effectiveness of the integrated CM-NTDs approach compared to the fragmented (vertical) disease management. Primary data were collected from two integrated intervention counties and two non-intervention counties to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of the integrated program model vs. fragmented (vertical) care. Data was sourced from the NTDs program annual budgets and financial reports for integrated CM-NTDs and Mass Drug Administration (MDA) to determine cost drivers and effectiveness. RESULTS: The total cost incurred by the integrated CM-NTD approach from 2017 to 2019 was US$ 789,856.30, with the highest percentage of costs for program staffing and motivation (41.8%), followed by operating costs (24.8%). In the two counties implementing fragmented (vertical) disease management, approximately US$ 325,000 was spent on the diagnosis of 84 persons and the treatment of twenty-four persons suffering from NTDs. While 2.5 times as much was spent in integrated counties, 9-10 times more patients were diagnosed and treated. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of a patient being diagnosed under the fragmented (vertical) implementation is five times higher than integrated CM-NTDs, and providing treatment is ten times as costly. Findings indicate that the integrated CM-NTDs strategy has achieved its primary objective of improved access to NTD services. The success of implementing an integrated CM-NTDs approach in Liberia, presented in this paper, demonstrates that NTD integration is a cost-minimizing solution.


Sujet(s)
Prise en charge personnalisée du patient , Prestations des soins de santé , Infections , Maladies négligées , Africains de l'Ouest , Humains , /statistiques et données numériques , Budgets , Prise en charge personnalisée du patient/économie , Prise en charge personnalisée du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Liberia/épidémiologie , Maladies négligées/économie , Maladies négligées/thérapie , Évaluation du Coût-Efficacité , Infections/économie , Infections/thérapie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Médecine tropicale/économie , Médecine tropicale/statistiques et données numériques , Accessibilité des services de santé/économie , Accessibilité des services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Prestations des soins de santé/économie , Prestations des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Africains de l'Ouest/statistiques et données numériques
17.
Health Econ ; 31(10): 2142-2169, 2022 10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932257

RÉSUMÉ

Better integration is a priority for most international health systems. However, multiple interventions are often implemented simultaneously, making evaluation difficult and providing limited evidence for policy makers about specific interventions. We evaluate a common integrated care intervention, multi-disciplinary group (MDG) meetings for discussion of high-risk patients, introduced in one socio-economically deprived area in the UK in spring 2015. Using data from multiple waves of the national GP Patient Survey and Hospital Episode Statistics, we estimate its effects on primary and secondary care utilization and costs, health status and patient experience. We use triple differences, exploiting the targeting at people aged 65 years and over, parsing effects from other population-level interventions implemented simultaneously. The intervention reduced the probability of visiting a primary care nurse by three percentage points and decreased length of stay by 1 day following emergency care admission. However, since planned care use increased, overall costs were unaffected. MDG meetings are presumably fulfilling public health objectives by decreasing length of stay and detecting previously unmet needs. However, the effect of MDGs on health system cost is uncertain and health remains unchanged. Evaluations of specific integrated care interventions may be more useful to public decision makers facing budget constraints.


Sujet(s)
Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Hospitalisation , Équipe soignante , Sujet âgé , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/tendances , Coûts des soins de santé , Humains , Durée du séjour , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Équipe soignante/économie , Équipe soignante/tendances , Zones de pauvreté , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Royaume-Uni
18.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 83(2)2022 02 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120286

RÉSUMÉ

Objective: To examine whether measures of depression symptom severity could improve understanding of health care costs for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or treatment-resistant depression (TRD) from the health plan perspective.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study within an integrated health system, cohorts consisted of 2 mutually exclusive groups: (1) adults with TRD based on a standard treatment algorithm and (2) adults with MDD, but no TRD, identified through ICD-9/10-CM codes. Depression severity was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Patterns of health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs were compared between the TRD and MDD groups overall and within the groups at different symptom levels. A general linear model with a γ distribution and log link for cost outcomes, logistic regression for binary outcomes, and negative binomial regression for count outcomes were used.Results: Patients with TRD (n = 24,534) had greater comorbidity than those in the MDD group (n = 17,628). Mean age in the TRD group was 52.8 years versus 48.2 for MDD (P < .001). Both groups were predominantly female (TRD: 72.8% vs MDD: 66.9%; P < .001). Overall, the TRD group had greater costs than the MDD group, with 1.23 times (95% CI, 1.21-1.26; P < .001) greater total cost on average over 1 year following index date. Within both groups, those with severe symptoms had greater total mean (SD) costs (TRD: moderate: $12,429 [$23,900] vs severe: $13,344 [$22,895], P < .001; low: $12,220 [$31,864] vs severe: $13,344 [$22,895], P < .001; MDD: moderate: $8,899 [$20,755] vs severe: $10,098 [$22,853]; P < .001; low: $8,752 [$25,800] vs severe: $10,098 [$22,853], P < .001).Conclusions: MDD and TRD impose high costs for health systems, with increasing costs as PHQ-9 symptom severity rises. Better understanding of subgroups with different symptom levels could improve clinical care by helping target interventions.


Sujet(s)
Trouble dépressif majeur/économie , Trouble dépressif résistant aux traitements/économie , Coûts des soins de santé , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Acuité des besoins du patient , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Études de cohortes , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Utilisation des installations et des services/économie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Questionnaire de santé du patient , Études rétrospectives
19.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 16(10): 1522-1530, 2021 10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34620648

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medicare plans to extend financial structures tested through the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Initiative-an alternative payment model for maintenance dialysis providers-to promote high-value care for beneficiaries with kidney failure. The End-Stage Renal Disease Seamless Care Organizations (ESCOs) that formed under the CEC Initiative varied greatly in their ability to generate cost savings and improve patient health outcomes. This study examined whether organizational or community characteristics were associated with ESCOs' performance. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used a retrospective pooled cross-sectional analysis of all 37 ESCOs participating in the CEC Initiative during 2015-2018 (n=87 ESCO-years). Key exposures included ESCO characteristics: number of dialysis facilities, number and types of physicians, and years of CEC Initiative experience. Outcomes of interest included were above versus below median gross financial savings (2.4%) and standardized mortality ratio (0.93). We analyzed unadjusted differences between high- and low-performing ESCOs and then used multivariable logistic regression to construct average marginal effect estimates for parameters of interest. RESULTS: Above-median gross savings were obtained by 23 (52%) ESCOs with no program experience, 14 (32%) organizations with 1 year of experience, and seven (16%) organizations with 2 years of experience. The adjusted likelihoods of achieving above-median gross savings were 23 (95% confidence interval, 8 to 37) and 48 (95% confidence interval, 24 to 68) percentage points higher for ESCOs with 1 or 2 years of program experience, respectively (versus none). The adjusted likelihood of achieving above-median gross savings was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, -3 to -1) percentage points lower with each additional affiliated dialysis facility. Adjusted mortality rates were lower for ESCOs located in areas with higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller ESCOs, organizations with more experience in the CEC Initiative, and those located in more affluent areas performed better under the CEC Initiative.


Sujet(s)
Accountable care organizations (USA)/organisation et administration , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Défaillance rénale chronique/thérapie , Medicare (USA)/organisation et administration , Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé/organisation et administration , Dialyse rénale , Accountable care organizations (USA)/économie , Économies , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Études transversales , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Coûts des soins de santé , Humains , Défaillance rénale chronique/diagnostic , Défaillance rénale chronique/économie , Défaillance rénale chronique/mortalité , Medicare (USA)/économie , Caractéristiques du voisinage , Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé/économie , Assurance de la qualité des soins de santé/organisation et administration , Indicateurs qualité santé/organisation et administration , Dialyse rénale/effets indésirables , Dialyse rénale/économie , Dialyse rénale/mortalité , Études rétrospectives , Classe sociale , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique , États-Unis
20.
Recenti Prog Med ; 112(10): 615-618, 2021 10.
Article de Italien | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34647529

RÉSUMÉ

Integrated Care (IC) is an "umbrella" term, under which numerous definitions are collected, which implies an attempt to coordinate and integrate fragmented and piecemeal health systems with new organizational arrangements. In fact, poor coordination of care is often a major obstacle for patients who access to health services. This adds on concern to the increasing demand for health and the greater proportion of healthcare expenditure induced by aging and chronic multiple comorbidity of patients. IC therefore sets itself the ambitious goal of harmonizing and optimizing patient care, both physical-mental and social, in order to obtain a continuous multi-organizational assistance. Although the principles on which IC is based are intuitive and simple, its extensive application is complicated and difficult to achieve. Within this article, we first try to define the concept of IC through a general review of the scientific literature on the subject. Then, we analyze the main economic and political criticalities of IC. Finally, we try to suggest recommendations about IC that can be extended to the health services of the member countries of the European Union.


Sujet(s)
Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Dépenses de santé , Vieillissement , Maladie chronique/économie , Maladie chronique/thérapie , Comorbidité , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/tendances , Union européenne , Dépenses de santé/tendances , Humains
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE