Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 10.407
Filtrer
1.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 274, 2024 Jul 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956514

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on mental health, with evidence suggesting an enduring mental health crisis. Studies worldwide observed increased usage of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics during the pandemic, notably among young people and women. However, few studies tracked consumption post-2021. Our study aimed to fill this gap by investigating whether the surge in the number psychotropic drug consumers in France persisted 2 years after the first lockdown, particularly focusing on age and gender differences. METHODS: We conducted a national retrospective observational study based on the French national insurance database. We retrieved all prescriptions of anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antidepressants dispensed in pharmacies in France for the period 2015-2022. We performed interrupted time series analyses based on Poisson models for five age classes (12-18; 19-25; 26-50; 51-75; 76 and more) to assess the trend before lockdown, the gap induced and the change in trend after. RESULTS: In the overall population, the number of consumers remained constant for antidepressants while it decreased for anxiolytics and hypnotics. Despite this global trend, a long-term increase was observed in the 12-18 and 19-25 groups for the three drug classes. Moreover, for these age classes, the increases were more pronounced for women than men, except for hypnotics where the trends were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The number of people using antidepressants continues to increase more than 2 years after the first lockdown, showing a prolonged effect on mental health. This effect is particularly striking among adolescents and young adults confirming the devastating long-term impact of the pandemic on their mental health.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , France/épidémiologie , Femelle , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Adolescent , Adulte , Jeune adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Enfant , Mâle , Sujet âgé , Antidépresseurs/usage thérapeutique , Anxiolytiques/usage thérapeutique , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/usage thérapeutique , Pandémies , SARS-CoV-2 , Facteurs sexuels
2.
Psychooncology ; 33(7): e6369, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960607

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer can significantly impact mental wellbeing, creating uncertainty and morbidity. This study described patterns of psychotropic medication and mental health service use, as a proxy measure for mental health problems, 5 years before and 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Population-based registry data were linked with Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare Benefits Schedule data for all prostate cancer patients diagnosed in South Australia between 2012 and 2020 (n = 13,693). We estimated the proportion and rates of psychotropic medication and mental health service use before and after diagnosis. Multivariable adjusted interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) were conducted to uncover temporal patterns. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of men commenced psychotropic medications and 6.4% sought out mental health services for the first time after diagnosis. Psychotropic medication use rose from 34.5% 5 years before to 40.3% 5 years after diagnosis, including an increase in use of antidepressants (from 20.7% to 26.0%) and anxiolytics (from 11.3% to 12.8%). Mental health service use increased from 10.2% to 12.1%, with the increase mostly being general practice mental health visits (from 7.8% to 10.6%). Multivariable ITSA indicated a significant rise in medication and service utilisation immediately before and in the first 2 years following prostate cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: There is a clear increase in psychotropic medication use and mental health service use around the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Mental health outcomes of men with prostate cancer may be improved with early mental health screening, particularly during the diagnosis process, to enable early intervention.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé mentale , Tumeurs de la prostate , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Mâle , Tumeurs de la prostate/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs de la prostate/psychologie , Tumeurs de la prostate/thérapie , Sujet âgé , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Australie-Méridionale , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Santé mentale , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Troubles mentaux/traitement médicamenteux , Enregistrements , Analyse de série chronologique interrompue , Anxiolytiques/usage thérapeutique , Antidépresseurs/usage thérapeutique , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques
3.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0305392, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870104

RÉSUMÉ

The use of psychotropic drugs among students is well known, but very few studies have been carried out outside North America, and data on Switzerland are particularly scarce. This study investigates the factors that determine the use of drugs and psychotropic substances among students at the University of Lausanne. Our hypotheses were that study pressure could lead to psychotropic drug use; that use could be either regular or experimental; and that users and non-users would have different opinions about the reasons for use and the consequences. Based on a convenience sample (n = 1199) collected by Master's students from other university students as part of a course given in 2019, our three hypotheses were confirmed. The use of psychotropic drugs is well associated with poorer academic performance. Regarding frequency of use, certain types of psychotropic drugs are used regularly (e.g. antidepressants), while others are used on occasionally (e.g. tranquilizers). Psychotropic substances such as cannabis and cocaine, on the other hand, are mainly used irregularly. Finally, the majority of psychotropic drug users report that they use them as part of their medical treatment, while the majority of non-users suggest that they use them mainly to reduce anxiety and stress in everyday life and at school. Our results show that Switzerland, like other countries, is affected by the phenomenon of psychotropic drug use by students, even outside medical supervision. Accordingly, better information on the negative effects of these substances should then be provided to all university students.


Sujet(s)
Psychoanaleptiques , Étudiants , Humains , Suisse , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Étudiants/psychologie , Universités , Mâle , Femelle , Jeune adulte , Adulte , Adolescent , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Anxiété
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14257, 2024 06 20.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902395

RÉSUMÉ

It is well-recognized that individuals with alcohol-related disorders often use other psychoactive substances; however, systematic research on this topic remains limited. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of lifetime psychoactive substance use and describe the dependence between concurrent use of alcohol and other drugs on psychiatric comorbidities in the analyzed group. The secondary aim was to try to assess the frequency of seeking psychiatric treatment between individuals declaring the concurrent use of alcohol with other drugs and those declaring the use only alcohol. The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional analysis based on discharge reports from psychiatric patients admitted to the Regional Psychiatric Hospital in Olsztyn, Poland. 1015 cases were included and analyzed in the study. Data for the study were collected in specially designed monitoring cards from discharge reports including data from psychiatric examinations, especially anamnesis. The percentage of people declaring lifetime use of psychoactive substances was 17.6%. 2.8% of them were diagnosed with substance-related disorders (F11-19 according to ICD-10). The most frequently declared use was cannabis, followed by amphetamine-type substances, benzodiazepines and new psychoactive substances. In the group of people declaring the lifetime use of psychoactive substances, 13.4% were additionally diagnosed with mental disorders. It was, consequently, 8% in the group of people denying the lifetime use of psychoactive substances. People declaring lifetime use of psychoactive substances were significantly more likely to seek psychiatric treatment, i.e. they were admitted significantly more often on an emergency admission than on an elective one, these people were significantly more likely to have undergone psychiatric treatment in the past and were more often hospitalized in our center during the research period. People who concurrently use alcohol with other drugs significantly more often have psychiatric comorbidity than people who deny the use of other drugs. That group also visibly more often seeks psychiatric treatment than patients who deny taking psychoactive substances.


Sujet(s)
Alcoolisme , Comorbidité , Troubles mentaux , Troubles liés à une substance , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Troubles liés à une substance/épidémiologie , Troubles liés à une substance/psychologie , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Troubles mentaux/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études transversales , Études rétrospectives , Alcoolisme/épidémiologie , Pologne/épidémiologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Prévalence , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Jeune adulte , Adolescent , Sujet âgé
5.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(12)2024 Jun 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38928021

RÉSUMÉ

Drug repurposing, rebranding an existing drug for a new therapeutic indication, is deemed a beneficial approach for a quick and cost-effective drug discovery process by skipping preclinical, Phase 1 trials and pharmacokinetic studies. Several psychotropic drugs, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), were studied for their potential application in different diseases, especially in cancer therapy. Fluoxetine (FLX) is one of the most prescribed psychotropic agents from the SSRIs class for the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders with a favorable safety profile. FLX exhibited different oncolytic effects via mechanisms distinct from its main serotonergic activity. Taking advantage of its ability to rapidly penetrate the blood-brain barrier, FLX could be particularly useful in brain tumors. This was proved by different in vitro and in vivo experiments using FLX as a monotherapy or combination with temozolomide (TMZ) or radiotherapy. In this review of the literature, we summarize the potential pleiotropic oncolytic roles of FLX against different cancers, highlighting the multifaceted activities of FLX and its ability to interrupt cancer proliferation via several molecular mechanisms and even surmount multidrug resistance (MDR). We elaborated on the successful synergistic combinations such as FXR/temozolomide and FXR/raloxifene for the treatment of glioblastoma and breast cancer, respectively. We showcased beneficial pharmaceutical trials to load FLX onto carriers to enhance its safety and efficacy on cancer cells. This is the first review article extensively summarizing all previous FLX repurposing studies for the management of cancer.


Sujet(s)
Repositionnement des médicaments , Fluoxétine , Humains , Repositionnement des médicaments/méthodes , Fluoxétine/usage thérapeutique , Fluoxétine/pharmacologie , Animaux , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Antinéoplasiques/pharmacologie , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Psychoanaleptiques/pharmacologie , Inbiteurs sélectifs de la recapture de la sérotonine/usage thérapeutique , Inbiteurs sélectifs de la recapture de la sérotonine/pharmacologie
6.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2357232, 2024 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833339

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has raised concerns about high prevalence of drug-related problems, polypharmacy and inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing in nursing homes (NHs) and confirmed lack of studies from Central and South-Eastern Europe. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy and inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing in NH residents in Croatia. METHODS: Data from 226 older NH residents from five Croatian NHs were collected using the InterRAI Long-Term Care Facilities assessment form. The prevalence and determinants of polypharmacy/hyperpolypharmacy and patterns of inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing were documented. RESULTS: The prevalence of polypharmacy (49.6%) and hyperpolypharmacy (25.7%) among NH residents was high. In our study, 72.1% of NH residents were prescribed at least one psychotropic agent, 36.7% used 2-3 psychotropics and 6.6% used 4+ psychotropics. Among benzodiazepine users (55.8%), 28% of residents were prescribed benzodiazepines in higher than recommended geriatric doses, 75% used them for the long term and 48% were prescribed concomitant interacting medications. The odds of being prescribed polypharmacy/hyperpolypharmacy were significantly higher for older patients with polymorbidity (6+ disorders, proportional odds ratio (POR) = 19.8), type II diabetes (POR = 5.2), ischemic heart disease (POR = 4.6), higher frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS ≥5); POR = 4.3) and gastrointestinal problems (POR = 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Our research underscores the persistent challenge of inappropriate medication use and drug-related harms among older NH residents, despite existing evidence and professional campaigns. Effective regulatory and policy interventions, including the implementation of geriatrician and clinical pharmacy services, are essential to address this critical issue and ensure optimal medication management for vulnerable NH populations.


Sujet(s)
Benzodiazépines , Prescription inappropriée , Maisons de repos , Polypharmacie , Humains , Maisons de repos/statistiques et données numériques , Benzodiazépines/usage thérapeutique , Benzodiazépines/effets indésirables , Benzodiazépines/administration et posologie , Prescription inappropriée/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Femelle , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Sujet âgé , Croatie/épidémiologie , Maisons de retraite médicalisées/statistiques et données numériques , Prévalence , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Psychoanaleptiques/effets indésirables , Types de pratiques des médecins/statistiques et données numériques , Types de pratiques des médecins/normes
7.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 37(4): e13266, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863266

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is commonly associated with intellectual disability, but also with a specific behavioural phenotype and a high predisposition to psychiatric comorbidity. This study examines the psychiatric care situation of people with PWS. METHOD: A structured online questionnaire was administered to carers of people with PWS living in Germany, asking about demographic, diagnostic and treatment parameters as well as personal experiences. RESULTS: Of 77 people with PWS, 44.2% had at least one psychiatric comorbid diagnosis. The main reasons for seeking psychiatric care were emotional outbursts and aggressive behaviour. 34.9% reported that they were currently seeking psychiatric care without success. However, 32.5% of PWS had been treated with psychotropic medication, mainly antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric comorbidity appears to be undertreated in PWS, especially in the ambulatory setting. Uncertainty among mental health care providers may also lead to frequent off-label use of psychotropic medications.


Sujet(s)
Comorbidité , Troubles mentaux , Syndrome de Prader-Willi , Humains , Syndrome de Prader-Willi/traitement médicamenteux , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Jeune adulte , Allemagne/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Acceptation des soins par les patients
8.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 24(6): 575-584, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771657

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a disabling psychiatric condition with a worldwide prevalence between 6% and 9%, and more common in the female than in the male sex. The aim of this paper is to review and comment on the different factors that might explain the discrepancies in the pharmacological management of women and men. AREAS COVERED: The available literature shows that there exists a vulnerability of women to develop PTSD that may depend on neurobiological as well as environmental/cultural factors. These variables might influence the clinical picture, the outcome and the response to specific treatments, given their consequences on the pharmacokinetics of commonly prescribed drugs. Women suffering from PTSD are more prone to consult and receive more prescriptions of psychotropic drugs than men. However, it is evident that the particular stages of a women's life such as pregnancy or breastfeeding might require a specific evaluation and care. EXPERT OPINION: It is necessary to explore the pharmacokinetics of compounds highlighting sex-related differences, and their safety during pregnancy and lactation. Taking care of differences between women and men should represent a main focus of research, while being a primary target towards a really tailored pharmacological treatment of PTSD.


Sujet(s)
Psychoanaleptiques , Troubles de stress post-traumatique , Humains , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/traitement médicamenteux , Femelle , Mâle , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Grossesse , Caractères sexuels , Facteurs sexuels
9.
Rev Prat ; 74(4): 420-426, 2024 Apr.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814039

RÉSUMÉ

COMMON PHYSICAL HEALTH PROBLEMS IN PSYCHIATRY. Somatic psychiatric care is particularly important as life expectancy declines of 13 to 16 years among individuals with severe mental disorders, primaly due to cardiovascular and cancer-related diseases. They face a triple burden: their mental disorders, reduced life expectancy and limited healthcare access. Common comorbidities related to psychotropic medications, lifestyle and the mental condition itself, affect various organs with complex clinical expressions. The multidimensional vulnerability is attributable to the side-effects of psychotropic drugs, mental disorders, and healthcare system fragmentation, hindering access to care. The proposed solutions aim for a better integration of mental health into general healthcare, with increased awareness among caregivers for a holistic approach to health.


PROBLÈMES COURANTS DE SANTÉ PHYSIQUE EN PSYCHIATRIE. Les soins somatiques en psychiatrie revêtent une importance particulière en raison de la réduction de treize à seize ans de l'espérance de vie chez les personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux sévères, principalement à cause de pathologies cardiovasculaires et cancéreuses. Elles sont exposées à une triple peine : leurs troubles psychiques, la réduction de leur espérance de vie et un accès limité aux soins. Les comorbidités courantes, liées aux psychotropes, au mode de vie et à la pathologie mentale elle-même, touchent divers organes, avec des expressions cliniques complexes. La vulnéra bilité multidimensionnelle de ces patients est attribuable aux effets indésirables des psychotropes, aux troubles psychiques et au cloisonnement du système de santé nuisant à l'accès aux soins. Les solutions proposées visent une meilleure intégration du volet santé mentale dans les soins généraux, avec une sensibilisation accrue des soignants à une approche holistique de la santé.


Sujet(s)
Troubles mentaux , Humains , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Psychoanaleptiques/effets indésirables , Maladies cardiovasculaires , Comorbidité , Tumeurs/complications
10.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(7): 2048-2059, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720614

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Medication use around widowhood has been poorly described for most medication classes. Medication use patterns can reflect health consequences of spousal loss, as previously shown for psychotropic drugs. METHODS: We used data from nationwide health registers (2008-2020) to describe the patterns of use of dispensed medications in all widowed Swedes aged ≥65 years followed between 2 years before and 2 years after spousal death. All prescription drugs used by at least 5% of the cohort were considered according to their therapeutic subgroups (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] classification system 2nd level). We used group-based trajectory models to cluster widowed individuals into up to 4 distinct longitudinal patterns of monthly medication use. We ranked the therapeutic subgroups with similar patterns according to their plausibility to reflect potential health effects of spousal loss, compared to those of psycholeptics (mainly anxiolytics, hypnotics) and psychoanaleptics (mainly antidepressants) as the references. RESULTS: From 212,111 widowed adults included (68% female and 70% aged ≥75 years), we observed a significant increasing trend in medication use, especially after spousal death, for 21 out of the 39 different therapeutic subgroups that were used by at least 5% (most represented pharmacological groups: cardiovascular system, nervous system, and alimentary tract and metabolism). This increasing trend often concerned only a small proportion of individuals, with varying magnitude and speed of change in medication use across therapeutic subgroups. The patterns of use of antiepileptics, laxatives, skin emollients/protectives, analgesics, and drugs for anemia, constipation, or peptic ulcers, were the closest to those of references, displaying the largest changes in use, and were therefore ranked as the most likely to reflect health effects of spousal loss. CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed the increase in psychotropic medications' use in widowed older adults and identified several potential physical health effects of spousal loss that warrant further research.


Sujet(s)
Deuil (perte) , Enregistrements , Veuvage , Humains , Femelle , Sujet âgé , Suède , Mâle , Veuvage/statistiques et données numériques , Veuvage/psychologie , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Conjoints/statistiques et données numériques , Conjoints/psychologie , Études longitudinales , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique
11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728674

RÉSUMÉ

Objective: To examine the complexities of psychotropic medication prescription in home-based palliative care for oncology patients.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 125 medical records of patients receiving palliative home care for cancer was conducted at a tertiary hospital, with a specific focus on the prescription patterns of psychotropic medications. The data were collected in September 2023.Results: Among 125 cases, the mean age was 64.4 ± 14.9 years, with 50.4% females. Breast cancer (14.4%) and lung cancer (13.6%) were the most common diagnoses. Psychotropic medication was administered to 35.2% of patients. Treatment was initiated by palliative care doctors in 75% of cases, while psychiatrists handled 25%. Medication selection was predominantly symptom driven (63%), with anxiety prompting benzodiazepine prescriptions in 50% of cases, depression resulting in antidepressant use in 22%, and psychosis leading to antipsychotic treatment in 18%. Specific diagnoses were the target in only 36% of prescriptions, with delirium (27%) being the most prevalent, followed by depression and bipolar disorder. Benzodiazepines were the most commonly prescribed class of medications (56.8%), with clonazepam being the most prevalent (40.9%), followed by alprazolam and lorazepam (15.9%). Atypical antipsychotics made up 43.1% of prescriptions, with quetiapine being the most frequently prescribed (34%), along with olanzapine and risperidone (11%). Antidepressants accounted for 31.8% of prescriptions, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors at 18% and mirtazapine and amitriptyline at 6% each. Haloperidol, a typical antipsychotic, was prescribed in 13.6% of cases. Polypharmacy was observed in 35.6% of patients.Conclusion: In palliative home care, psychotropic medications are frequently prescribed by palliative doctors primarily for symptom management, with limited psychiatric consultations and challenges in accessing psychological evaluations. Collaborative efforts among regional or institutional medical bodies, including psychiatrists, psychologists, palliative doctors, and social workers, are needed to establish ethical guidelines for appropriate and effective psychotropic prescription.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(2):23m03668. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.


Sujet(s)
Services de soins à domicile , Tumeurs , Soins palliatifs , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs/complications , Ordonnances médicamenteuses/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Types de pratiques des médecins/statistiques et données numériques
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249291, 2024 May 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691357

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Becoming a first-time parent is a major life-changing event and can be challenging regardless of the pregnancy outcome. However, little is known how different adverse pregnancy outcomes affect the father's risk of psychiatric treatment post partum. Objective: To examine the associations of adverse pregnancy outcomes with first-time psychiatric treatment in first-time fathers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cohort study covered January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, with a 1-year follow-up completed December 31, 2018. Data were gathered from Danish, nationwide registers. Participants included first-time fathers with no history of psychiatric treatment. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2022, to February 20, 2024. Exposures: Adverse pregnancy outcomes including induced abortion, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, small for gestational age (SGA) and not preterm, preterm with or without SGA, minor congenital malformation, major congenital malformation, and congenital malformation combined with SGA or preterm compared with a full-term healthy offspring. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prescription of psychotropic drugs, nonpharmacological psychiatric treatment, or having a psychiatric hospital contact up to 1 year after the end of the pregnancy. Results: Of the 192 455 fathers included (median age, 30.0 [IQR, 27.0-34.0] years), 31.1% experienced an adverse pregnancy outcome. Most of the fathers in the study had a vocational educational level (37.1%). Fathers experiencing a stillbirth had a significantly increased risk of initiating nonpharmacological psychiatric treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 23.10 [95% CI, 18.30-29.20]) and treatment with hypnotics (AHR, 9.08 [95% CI, 5.52-14.90]). Moreover, fathers experiencing an early induced abortion (≤12 wk) had an increased risk of initiating treatment with hypnotics (AHR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.33-2.29]) and anxiolytics (AHR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.18-2.73]). Additionally, late induced abortion (>12 wk) (AHR, 4.46 [95% CI, 3.13-6.38]) and major congenital malformation (AHR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.05-1.74]) were associated with increased risk of nonpharmacological treatment. In contrast, fathers having an offspring being born preterm, SGA, or with a minor congenital malformation did not have a significantly increased risk of any of the outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this Danish cohort study suggest that first-time fathers who experience stillbirths or induced abortions or having an offspring with major congenital malformation had an increased risk of initiating pharmacological or nonpharmacological psychiatric treatment. These findings further suggest a need for increased awareness around the psychological state of fathers following the experience of adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Sujet(s)
Pères , Issue de la grossesse , Humains , Danemark/épidémiologie , Femelle , Grossesse , Pères/statistiques et données numériques , Pères/psychologie , Adulte , Mâle , Issue de la grossesse/épidémiologie , Mortinatalité/épidémiologie , Mortinatalité/psychologie , Études de cohortes , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Nouveau-né , Nourrisson petit pour son âge gestationnel , Enregistrements , Avortement spontané/épidémiologie , Avortement provoqué/statistiques et données numériques , Avortement provoqué/psychologie
13.
Ital J Pediatr ; 50(1): 102, 2024 May 20.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764095

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: There is a global perception that psychotropic utilization in children and adolescents is increasing, especially with the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Available literature data on paediatric psychotropic medication prescriptions in Italy are limited to one or few regions and not updated. The aim of this study was to provide updated data on psychotropic prescriptions referred to the whole Italian paediatric population, as overall and by subgroups of medications and to evaluate if the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020 had an impact on prescription rates. METHODS: A descriptive study on psychotropic drug utilization in children and adolescents (< 18 years) resident in all Italian regions during 2020 was performed. Patients registered in the Pharmaceutical Prescriptions database with at least one prescription/dispensing of a psychotropic medication (antipsychotics-N05A), (antidepressants-N06A) and (psychostimulants-N06BA) during the study period were considered. The indicators used were the prescription rate (number of prescriptions per 1000 children) and prevalence of use (proportion of the paediatric population with at least one prescription in the relevant year). RESULTS: During the 2020 the prevalence of psychotropic drug use in the paediatric population was 0.3%, increased of 7.8% if compared to 2019. The same trend was observed for the prescription rate, which recorded an average of 28.2 per 1000 children with an increase of 11.6% if compared to previous year, representing the 0.6% of the overall drug use in this age group. The data showed a growing trend prescription by age, reaching the peak in adolescents aged 12-17 years old, with a prescription rate of 65 per 1000 children and a prevalence of 0.71%. Considering the subgroups of psychotropic medications, the highest prevalence of use was found for antipsychotic drugs, received by the 0.19% of the paediatric population during 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic drug utilization in children and adolescents has grown during 2020 in Italy and worldwide, raising alarms from health care clinicians and patient advocates about the increase of burden of mental diseases in paediatric population during the COVID-19 pandemic. A more systematic monitoring of the use of psychotropic medications should be implemented in all countries for collecting relevant information about children and adolescents taking psychotropic drugs, in order to address the present and the future of the mental health of the paediatric population.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Italie/épidémiologie , Enfant , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Adolescent , Mâle , Femelle , Ordonnances médicamenteuses/statistiques et données numériques , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Types de pratiques des médecins/statistiques et données numériques , Pandémies , Utilisation médicament/statistiques et données numériques , Utilisation médicament/tendances , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Psychogeriatrics ; 24(3): 665-674, 2024 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561326

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The use of opioid medicines is common in developed countries, particularly among older adults and those with mental health disorders. It is unclear if the association between mental disorders and opioid medicines is causal, or is due to reverse causality or confounding. METHODS: We used a 10% random sample of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (years 2012-2022) to examine the cross-sectional, case-control and longitudinal association between the dispensing of antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antipsychotics and lithium, and opioid medicines. We used logistic regression, structural equation models (SEM), and Cox regression to analyze the data. Analyses were adjusted for age (years), sex, and number of non-psychotropic medicines dispensed during the year. RESULTS: The 2022 file contained 804 334 individuals aged 50 years or over (53.1% women), of whom 181 690 (22.6%) received an opioid medicine. The adjusted odds ratio of being dispensed opioid medicines was 1.44 (99% CI = 1.42-1.46) for antidepressants, 1.97 (99% CI = 1.92-2.03) for anxiolytics, 1.55 (99% CI = 1.51-1.60) for hypnotics, 1.32 (99% CI = 1.27-1.38) for antipsychotics, and 0.60 (99% CI = 0.53-0.69) for lithium. Similar associations were noticed when we compared participants who were or not dispensed opioid medicines in 2022 for exposure to psychotropic agents between 2012 and 2021. SEM confirmed that this association was not due to reverse causality. The dispensing of antidepressants was associated with increased adjusted hazard (HR) of subsequent dispensing of opioid medicines (HR = 1.29, 99% CI = 1.27-1.30). Similar associations were observed for anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics, but not lithium. CONCLUSIONS: The dispensing of opioid medicines is higher among older individuals exposed to antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics than those who are not. These associations are not due to reverse causality or study design. Preventive strategies seeking to minimise the risk of inappropriate use of opioid medicines in later life should consider targeting this high-risk population.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques , Psychoanaleptiques , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Australie/épidémiologie , Études cas-témoins , Études transversales , Troubles mentaux/traitement médicamenteux , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Études longitudinales
15.
Psychogeriatrics ; 24(4): 968-982, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38638077

RÉSUMÉ

Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are a clinical challenge for the lack of a sound taxonomy, frequent presentation with comorbid BPSD, lack of specific pharmacologic interventions, poor base of methodologically sound evidence with randomized clinical trials, contamination from the treatment of behavioural disturbances of young and adult psychiatric conditions, and small efficacy window of psychotropic drugs. We present here a treatment workflow based on a concept-driven literature review based on the notions that (i) the aetiology of BPSD can be mainly neurobiological (so-called 'primary' symptoms) or mainly environmental and functional ('secondary' symptoms) and that this drives treatment; (ii) the clinical efficacy of psychotropic drugs is driven by their specific profile of receptor affinity; (iii) drug treatment should follow the rules of 'start low-go slow, prescribe and revise'. This article argues in support of the distinction between primary and secondary BPSD, as well as their characteristics, which until now have been just sketchily described in the literature. It also offers comprehensive and pragmatic clinician-oriented recommendations for the treatment of BPSD.


Sujet(s)
Démence , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Démence/traitement médicamenteux , Démence/psychologie , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Symptômes comportementaux/traitement médicamenteux , Symptômes comportementaux/diagnostic , Troubles mentaux/traitement médicamenteux , Troubles mentaux/thérapie
16.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 32(8): 944-954, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600005

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Understanding experiences and challenges faced by persons living with Early-Onset Dementia (EOD) compared to individuals diagnosed with Late-Onset Dementia (LOD) is important for the development of targeted interventions. OBJECTIVE: Describe differences in sociodemographic, neuropsychiatric behavioral symptoms, caregiver characteristics, and psychotropic use. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, retrospective study including 908 UCLA Alzheimer's Dementia Care Program participants (177 with EOD and 731 with LOD). MEASUREMENTS: Onset of dementia was determined using age at program enrollment, with EOD defined as age <65 years and LOD defined as age >80 years. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were measured once at enrollment. Behavioral symptoms were measured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity score and caregiver distress was measured using the NPI-Q distress score. Medications included antipsychotic, antidepressant, benzodiazepines and other hypnotics, antiepileptics, and dementia medications. RESULTS: EOD compared to LOD participants were more likely men, college graduates, married, live alone, and have fewer comorbidities. EOD caregivers were more often spouses (56% vs 26%, p <0.01), whereas LOD caregivers were more often children (57% vs 10%, p <0.01). EOD was associated with lower odds of being above the median (worse) NPI-Q severity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.96) and NPI-Q distress scores (aOR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.88). Psychotropic use did not differ between groups though symptoms were greater for LOD compared to EOD. CONCLUSION: Persons with EOD compared to LOD had sociodemographic differences, less health conditions, and fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms. Future policies could prioritize counseling for EOD patients and families, along with programs to support spousal caregivers of persons with EOD.


Sujet(s)
Âge de début , Aidants , Démence , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Aidants/psychologie , Démence/épidémiologie , Études transversales , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Détresse psychologique
17.
J Pediatr ; 271: 114056, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615943

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, trends, and factors associated with psychotropic medication use and polypharmacy among children and adolescents initiating intensive behavioral therapy for severe challenging behavior over a 10-year period. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective observational study, we examined data from caregiver interviews and patient medical records on the number and types of psychotropic medications prescribed to patients initiating intensive behavioral therapy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Trends in medication use and polypharmacy across the 10-year period were analyzed using regression analysis, while differences in demographics and clinical factors for patients with use and polypharmacy were analyzed using nonparametric statistical analysis with odds ratios presented for significant factors. RESULTS: Data from all 302 pediatric patients initiating intensive behavioral therapy across the 10-year period were analyzed. Among all patients and all years, 83.8% were taking at least 1 psychotropic medication and 68.2% experienced polypharmacy. There were no changes in the prevalence of use, mean number of medications taken, or polypharmacy across the 10-year period. Patients diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or anxiety disorder, as well as those exhibiting self-injurious behavior had higher use of psychotropic medication and polypharmacy and were taking more medications overall. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic medication use and polypharmacy were extremely high for children and adolescents with severe challenging behavior, but use and polypharmacy did not change over the 10-year period of data collection. Further research is needed to establish the generality of these findings to other regions of the US.


Sujet(s)
Thérapie comportementale , Polypharmacie , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Enfant , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Études rétrospectives , Adolescent , Thérapie comportementale/méthodes , Comportement déviant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité/traitement médicamenteux
18.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 66(3): 125-129, 2024.
Article de Néerlandais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650508

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an evidence-based model that involves the collaborative development of a treatment plan. SDM in adolescents with mental health problems is complex. Most mental health problems arise in adolescence and psychotropic drugs are an important part of treatment. Previous research focuses primarily on caregivers’ experience with SDM. AIM: This research has the main objective to gain insight into the adolescents’ experience with shared decision making related to psychotropic drugs. METHODS: Qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with 12 adolescents (12-18 years old) between June and October 2021, followed by thematic analysis of the data using the systematic text condensation (Malterud). RESULTS: Four themes were identified in the analysis: 1) the adolescent wants to feel heard, 2) the adolescent needs support in forming and expressing his/her opinion, 3) SDM in adolescents is a complex trialogue, and 4) the decision-making process affects treatment and adherence. CONCLUSION: When we ask adolescents about their experience with SDM, we can learn the following:- Involve parents, but always tailor this to the individual adolescent and his context. – Put the adolescent at the center. – Dwell on the adolescent’s view on psychotropic drugs.


Sujet(s)
Prise de décision partagée , Psychoanaleptiques , Recherche qualitative , Humains , Adolescent , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Mâle , Femelle , Enfant , Prise de décision , Troubles mentaux/traitement médicamenteux
19.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 34(4): 210-213, 2024 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682450

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic that dramatically altered infection control procedures in long-term care facilities. Mental health decline among residents of geriatric facilities during the pandemic has been described (Ferro Uriguen et al., 2022). Our study aims to evaluate psychological effects of the pandemic on residents of a pediatric long-term care facility, a population comprised of medically complex children. To characterize this, we compared patterns of psychotropic medication use during the COVID-19 pandemic to those of the prepandemic period among residents of a 76-bed pediatric long-term care facility. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of psychotropic medication use from January 2019 to August 2022 using de-identified monthly facility medication refill data. Linear multivariable regression models were used to estimate the level and trends in the monthly rates of medication refills per 10,000 bed days among resident children before and after the pandemic onset. Six classes of psychotropic medications were analyzed including antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiety medications, trazodone, clonidine, mood stabilizers, and gabapentin. Results: The pandemic onset was associated with a significant increase in the monthly prescribing rates of antidepressant and anxiety medications (20.83; 95% CI, 3.96-37.71; p = 0.017), mood stabilizers (10.44; 95% CI, 5.79-15.09; p < 0.001), and trazodone (-27.66; 95% CI, -40.44 to 14.88; p < 0.001) above those expected by prepandemic trends. The trend in trazodone use changed significantly during the pandemic from decreasing prepandemic to increasing (2.21; 95% CI, 1.28-3.14; p < 0.001). Antidepressant, anxiety medication, and gabapentin use increased throughout the study. Antidepressant and anxiety medication use surged early in the pandemic, but then continued growth at their prior rates of use. Discussion: Increased use of antidepressant and anxiety medications and trazodone suggests a possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and agitation among children with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities living in long-term care.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Soins de longue durée , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Enfant , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Mâle , Femelle , Adolescent , Antidépresseurs/usage thérapeutique , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Anxiolytiques/usage thérapeutique , SARS-CoV-2 , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique
20.
J Affect Disord ; 356: 657-663, 2024 Jul 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657772

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric symptomatology and medications used in their treatment may be modifiable risk factors associated with cognitive function, although findings from population-based studies spanning the full adult age range are lacking. This study aimed to investigate associations between psychiatric symptomatology, psychotropic medication use and cognitive function in a population-based sample of men. METHODS: Data for 537 men were drawn from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Cognitive function (psychomotor function, attention, working memory and visual learning) was determined using the Cog-State Brief Battery. Current depressive and anxiety symptomatology was determined using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and psychotropic medication use was self-reported. Linear regression models were developed to determine associations between psychiatric symptomatology and psychotropic medication use with each cognitive measure. RESULTS: Depressive symptomatology was associated with lower overall cognitive function (b-0.037 ± 0.010, η2 = 0.025, p < 0.001), psychomotor function (b 0.006 ± 0.002, η2 = 0.028 p < 0.001) and attention (b 0.004 ± 0.001, η2 = 0.021, p < 0.001), whereas psychotropic use was associated with lower overall cognitive function (b - 0.174 ± 0.075, η2 = 0.010, p = 0.021), attention (b 0.017 ± 0.008, η2 = 0.008, p = 0.038 and working memory (b 0.031 ± 0.012, η2 = 0.010, p = 0.010). Anticonvulsant use was associated with lower overall cognitive function (b - 0.723 ± 0.172, η2 = 0.032, p < 0.001), attention (b 0.065 ± 0.018, η2 = 0.029, p < 0.001) and working memory (b 0.088 ± 0.026, η2 = 0.022, p < 0.001). All relationships were found to have a small effect. There were no significant associations between anxiety symptomatology and antidepressant and anxiolytic use with any of the cognitive domains. CONCLUSION: Depressive symptomatology and anticonvulsant use were associated with lower cognitive function. Understanding the underlying mechanisms involved in these relationships can advance knowledge on the heterogeneity in cognitive ageing and aid in prevention initiatives.


Sujet(s)
Cognition , Psychoanaleptiques , Humains , Mâle , Sujet âgé , Cognition/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Psychoanaleptiques/effets indésirables , Adulte d'âge moyen , Dépression/traitement médicamenteux , Dépression/épidémiologie , Anxiété/épidémiologie , Anxiété/traitement médicamenteux , Mémoire à court terme/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Attention/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Tests neuropsychologiques/statistiques et données numériques , Performance psychomotrice/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Adulte , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Dysfonctionnement cognitif/épidémiologie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...