More about low-dose rituximab and plasma exchange as front-line therapy for patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

INTRODUCTION: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is characterized by a reduction in the von Willebrand cleavage protein ADAMTS-13, mainly as a consequence of autoimmunity. Plasma exchange (PEx) is standard, achieving complete remission (CR) in 77-83% of cases, but rates are variable depending on ADAMTS-13 activity and relapse is frequent in patients with <10%. Thus, an effective front-line immunosuppressive treatment is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered PEx daily until CR and rituximab 100 mg/dose/week for 4 consecutive weeks to 10 patients with a first TTP episode and 1 relapsed patient (8 females (72%) and 3 males (28%)). Median age was 34 years (15-46) and laboratory parameters at diagnosis were as follows: platelets 11 × 10(9)/l (range 7-27.4 × 10(9)/l), lactate dehydrogenase 1822 U/l (range 705-8220 U/l, normal 70-180 U/l), and haemoglobin 6 g/dl (range 4.2-11.8 g/dl). ADAMTS-13 activity was determined in eight patients and was <10% in all. ADAMTS-13 autoantibody titre was determined in seven patients and was >15 units/ml in all (ref: negative <12, undetermined 12-15, positive >15 units/ml); Shiga toxin was negative in all patients. The median number of PEx until CR was 7 (range 4-12); prednisone 1 mg/kg was administered to six patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 22 months (range 4-49) and the estimated 2-year relapse-free survival was 89%; one HIV+ patient relapsed at 8 months follow-up. No complications related to PEx or rituximab were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that low-dose rituximab and PEx are effective as front-line treatment for acute TTP; however, a prospective trial is needed to demonstrate whether low-dose rituximab is as effective as the conventional dose.

Uso de plasmaféresis en unidades de pacientes críticos / Indications, adverse effects and results of plasmapheresis in critical care patients

Background: Plasmapheresis is a therapeutic alternative for diseases in which a "humoral factor" has pathogenetic relevance. However it is not devoid of adverse effects. Aim: To review the indications, number of procedures, morbidity and clinical evolution of plasmapheresis in critical patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study in four intensive care units of an University hospital. The severity of patients was evaluated with APACHE II and SOFA scores. Results: Twenty patients were studied. The most common indications of plasmapheresis were thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in 50% of subjects and small vessel vasculitides in 30%. The number of procedures per patient oscillated between 2 and 14 (mean: 7.1±3.3). The registered adverse effects were hypocalcemia in 50% of patients, hypotension in 42.1%, coagulopathy in 35%, hypokalemia in 29%, rash in 20%, procedure related infections in 18% and fever in 10%. There was a significant decrease of 17±28% in prothrombin time, after the procedures. Seventy five percent of patients had a favorable evolution. Global mortality rate was 15%. All deaths occurred in patients with TTP and were attributed to the progression of the disease. No death was attributed to the procedure. The initial APACHE II and SOFA scores were 12.4±8.4 and 5.3±2.9, respectively. Both scores decreased after the procedure. Among other therapeutic measures, 15% of the patients received immunosuppressant treatment, 27% were dialyzed and 32% were mechanically ventilated. Conclusions: The most common indication of plasmapheresis was TTP. Adverse effects were frequent, however there was no procedure related mortality. The global mortality rate was 15% and all deaths occurred in patients with TTP.

[Indications, adverse effects and results of plasmapheresis in critical care patients]. / Uso de plasmaféresis en unidades de pacientes críticos.

BACKGROUND: Plasmapheresis is a therapeutic alternative for diseases in which a "humoral factor" has pathogenetic relevance. However it is not devoid of adverse effects. AIM: To review the indications, number of procedures, morbidity and clinical evolution of plasmapheresis in critical patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective and descriptive study in four intensive care units of an University hospital. The severity of patients was evaluated with APACHE II and SOFA scores. RESULTS: Twenty patients were studied. The most common indications of plasmapheresis were thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in 50% of subjects and small vessel vasculitides in 30%. The number of procedures per patient oscillated between 2 and 14 (mean: 7.1+/-3.3). The registered adverse effects were hypocalcemia in 50% of patients, hypotension in 42.1%, coagulopathy in 35%, hypokalemia in 29%, rash in 20%, procedure related infections in 18% and fever in 10%. There was a significant decrease of 17+/-28% in prothrombin time, after the procedures. Seventy five percent of patients had a favorable evolution. Global mortality rate was 15%. All deaths occurred in patients with TTP and were attributed to the progression of the disease. No death was attributed to the procedure. The initial APACHE II and SOFA scores were 12.4+/-8.4 and 5.3+/-2.9, respectively. Both scores decreased after the procedure. Among other therapeutic measures, 15% of the patients received immunosuppressant treatment, 27% were dialyzed and 32% were mechanically ventilated. CONCLUSIONS: The most common indication of plasmapheresis was TTP. Adverse effects were frequent, however there was no procedure related mortality. The global mortality rate was 15% and all deaths occurred in patients with TTP.