Learnings from the 2024 Utah Cardiac Recovery Symposium: A Roadmap for the Field of Myocardial Recovery.

The 12th annual Utah Cardiac Recovery Symposium (U-CARS) in 2024 continued its mission to advance cardiac recovery by uniting experts across various fields. The symposium featured key presentations on cutting-edge topics such as CRISPR gene editing for heart failure, guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure (HF) with improved/recovered ejection fraction (HFimpEF), the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in treating cardiac arrest, and others. Discussions explored genetic and metabolic contributions to HF, emphasized the importance of maintaining pharmacotherapy in HFimpEF to prevent relapse, and identified future research directions including refining ECPR protocols, optimizing patient selection, and leveraging genetic insights to enhance therapeutic strategies.

A Deep-Learning-Based CPR Action Standardization Method.

In emergency situations, ensuring standardized cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) actions is crucial. However, current automated external defibrillators (AEDs) lack methods to determine whether CPR actions are performed correctly, leading to inconsistent CPR quality. To address this issue, we introduce a novel method called deep-learning-based CPR action standardization (DLCAS). This method involves three parts. First, it detects correct posture using OpenPose to recognize skeletal points. Second, it identifies a marker wristband with our CPR-Detection algorithm and measures compression depth, count, and frequency using a depth algorithm. Finally, we optimize the algorithm for edge devices to enhance real-time processing speed. Extensive experiments on our custom dataset have shown that the CPR-Detection algorithm achieves a mAP0.5 of 97.04%, while reducing parameters to 0.20 M and FLOPs to 132.15 K. In a complete CPR operation procedure, the depth measurement solution achieves an accuracy of 90% with a margin of error less than 1 cm, while the count and frequency measurements achieve 98% accuracy with a margin of error less than two counts. Our method meets the real-time requirements in medical scenarios, and the processing speed on edge devices has increased from 8 fps to 25 fps.

Efficacy of radial artery cannulation in treatment of cardiac arrest: A case report.

RATIONALE: Timely treatment and recovery of cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital settings present significant challenges. This report describes a novel method of integrating advanced monitoring techniques such as radial artery cannulation in the treatment of an 85-year-old male patient who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient, an 85-year-old man, experienced sudden cardiac arrest at home around 4:10 pm on November 22, 2023, characterized by immediate loss of consciousness and absence of pulse, and no response when called by name, necessitating urgent medical intervention. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with OHCA by the emergency doctor, which was further confirmed by the absence of spontaneous circulation and respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), ventilator-assisted ventilation, internal jugular venous catheterization, medical treatment, mechanical CPR, and supplemented by radial artery cannulation for invasive blood pressure monitoring. This technique was pivotal for real-time hemodynamic assessment. OUTCOMES: The invasive monitoring facilitated the early detection of the return of spontaneous circulation, allowing for the timely cessation of mechanical CPR. Subsequent treatment in the intensive care unit was optimized based on continuous arterial pressure readings, enhancing the stabilization of the patient's condition. LESSONS: This case underscores the significant role of radial artery cannulation for invasive blood pressure monitoring in improving clinical outcomes for patients experiencing OHCA. Integrating radial artery cannulation with other advanced monitoring techniques aids in the early detection of the return of spontaneous circulation and optimizes subsequent intensive care treatment.

Hyperfibrinolysis: potential guidance for decision-making to avoid futile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with very poor outcomes. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) for selected patients is a potential therapeutic option for refractory cardiac arrest. However, randomised controlled studies applying eCPR after refractory OHCA have demonstrated conflicting results regarding survival and good functional neurological outcomes. eCPR is an invasive, labour-intensive, and expensive therapeutic approach with associated side-effects. A rapid monitoring device would be valuable in facilitating selection of appropriate patients for this expensive and complex treatment. To this end, rapid diagnosis of hyperfibrinolysis, or premature clot dissolution, diagnosed by viscoelastic testing might represent a feasible option. Hyperfibrinolysis is an evolutionary response to low or no-flow states. Studies in trauma patients demonstrate a high mortality rate in those with established hyperfibrinolysis upon emergency room admission. Similar findings have now been reported for the first time in OHCA patients. Hyperfibrinolysis upon admission diagnosed by rotational thromboelastometry was strongly associated with mortality and poor neurological outcomes in a small cohort of patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been improving, but the best way to care for patients after the initial resuscitation remains poorly understood, and improvements in survival to discharge are stagnant. Existing North American cardiac arrest databases lack comprehensive data on the postresuscitation period, and we do not know current post-IHCA practice patterns. To address this gap, we developed the Discover IHCA study, which will thoroughly evaluate current post-IHCA care practices across a diverse cohort. OBJECTIVES: Our study collects granular data on post-IHCA treatment practices, focusing on temperature control and prognostication, with the objective of describing variation in current post-IHCA practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multicenter, prospectively collected, observational cohort study of patients who have suffered IHCA and have been successfully resuscitated (achieved ROSC). There are 24 enrolling hospital systems (23 in the United States) with 69 individuals enrolling in hospitals (39 in the United States). We developed a standardized data dictionary, and data collection began in October 2023, with a projected 1000 total enrollments. Discover IHCA is endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study collects data on patient characteristics, including prearrest frailty, arrest characteristics, and detailed information on postarrest practices and outcomes. Data collection on post-IHCA practice was structured around current American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Among other data elements, the study captures postarrest temperature control interventions and postarrest prognostication methods. RESULTS: The majority of participating hospital systems are large, academic, tertiary care centers serving urban populations. The analysis will evaluate variations in practice and their association with mortality and neurologic function. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We expect this study, Discover IHCA, to identify variability in practice and outcomes following IHCA and be a vital resource for future investigations into best practices for managing patients after IHCA.

Rapid cycle deliberate practice versus postsimulation debriefing in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Simulation plays an important role in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Comparing postsimulation debriefing with rapid cycle deliberate practice could help determine the best simulation strategy for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training among pediatric residents. METHODS: This is a single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled study. First- and second year pediatric residents were enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1 ratio): rapid cycle deliberate practice group (intervention) or postsimulation debriefing group (control). They participated in two rounds of simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest to assess the simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance gain (round 1) and retention after a 5-6 week washout period (round 2). Scenarios were video-recorded and analyzed by blinded evaluators. The main outcome was the time to initiation of chest compressions. Secondary outcomes included time to recognize a cardiopulmonary arrest, time to recognize a shockable rhythm, time to defibrillation, time to initiation of chest compressions after defibrillation, and chest compression fraction. RESULTS: Sixteen groups participated in the first round and fifteen groups in the second one. Time to intiation of chest compressions decreased from preintervention scenario to the round 1 testing scenario and increased from round 1 to round 2 testing scenario. However, no interaction effects nor group effects were observed (p=0.885 and p=0.329, respectively). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite an overall improvement in simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, we did not observe significant differences between the two groups regarding the analyzed variables. The decline in simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance after 5 weeks suggests the need for shorter time intervals between training sessions.

Ultrafast Cooling With Total Liquid Ventilation Mitigates Early Inflammatory Response and Offers Neuroprotection in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Brain injury is one of the most serious complications after cardiac arrest (CA). To prevent this phenomenon, rapid cooling with total liquid ventilation (TLV) has been proposed in small animal models of CA (rabbits and piglets). Here, we aimed to determine whether hypothermic TLV can also offer neuroprotection and mitigate cerebral inflammatory response in large animals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anesthetized pigs were subjected to 14 minutes of ventricular fibrillation followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation. After return of spontaneous circulation, animals were randomly subjected to normothermia (control group, n=8) or ultrafast cooling with TLV (TLV group, n=8). In the latter group, TLV was initiated within a window of 15 minutes after return of spontaneous circulation and allowed to reduce tympanic, esophageal, and bladder temperature to the 32 to 34 °C range within 30 minutes. After 45 minutes of TLV, gas ventilation was resumed, and hypothermia was maintained externally until 3 hours after CA, before rewarming using heat pads (0.5 °C-1 °C/h). After an additional period of progressive rewarming for 3 hours, animals were euthanized for brain withdrawal and histological analysis. At the end of the follow-up (ie, 6 hours after CA), histology showed reduced brain injury as witnessed by the reduced number of Fluroro-Jade C-positive cerebral degenerating neurons in TLV versus control. IL (interleukin)-1ra and IL-8 levels were also significantly reduced in the cerebrospinal fluid in TLV versus control along with cerebral infiltration by CD3+ cells. Conversely, circulating levels of cytokines were not different among groups, suggesting a discrepancy between local and systemic inflammatory levels. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafast cooling with TLV mitigates neuroinflammation and attenuates acute brain lesions in the early phase following resuscitation in large animals subjected to CA.

Dispatcher nurses' experiences of handling drones equipped with automated external defibrillators in suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Reducing the time to treatment by means of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation is essential to increasing survival after cardiac arrest. A novel method of dispatching drones for delivery of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) to the site of a suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been shown to be feasible, with the potential to shorten response times compared with the emergency medical services. However, little is known of dispatchers' experiences of using this novel methodology. METHODS: A qualitative semi-structured interview study with a phenomenological approach was used. Ten registered nurses employed at an emergency medical dispatch centre in Gothenburg, Sweden, were interviewed and the data was analysed by qualitative content analysis. The purpose was to explore dispatcher nurses' experiences of deliveries of AEDs by drones in cases of suspected OHCA. RESULTS: Three categories were formed. Nurses expressed varying compliance to the telephone-assisted protocol for dispatch of AED-equipped drones. They experienced uncertainty as to how long would be an acceptable interruption from the CPR protocol in order to retrieve a drone-delivered AED. The majority experienced that collegial support was important. Technical support, routines and training need to be improved to further optimise action in cases of drone-delivered AEDs handled by dispatcher nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Although telephone-assisted routines for drone dispatch in cases of OHCA were available, their use was rare. Registered nurses showed variable degrees of understanding of how to comply with these protocols. Collegial and technical support was considered important, alongside routines and training, which need to be improved to further support bystander use of drone-delivered AEDs. As the possibilities of using drones to deliver AEDs in cases of OHCA are explored more extensively globally, there is a good possibility that this study could be of benefit to other nations implementing similar methods. We present concrete aspects that are important to take into consideration when implementing this kind of methodology at dispatch centres.

Naloxone and Patient Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in California.

Importance: The incidence of opioid-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OA-OHCA) has grown from less than 1% of OHCA in 2000 to between 7% and 14% of OHCA in recent years; American Heart Association (AHA) protocols suggest that emergency medical service (EMS) clinicians consider naloxone in OA-OHCA. However, it is unknown whether naloxone improves survival in these patients or in patients with undifferentiated OHCA. Objective: To evaluate the association of naloxone with clinical outcomes in patients with undifferentiated OHCA. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of EMS-treated patients aged 18 or older who received EMS treatment for nontraumatic OHCA in 3 Northern California counties between 2015 and 2023. Data were analyzed using propensity score-based models from February to April 2024. Exposure: EMS administration of naloxone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge; the secondary outcome was sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Covariates included patient and cardiac arrest characteristics (eg, age, sex, nonshockable rhythm, any comorbidity, unwitnessed arrest, and EMS agency) and EMS clinician determination of OHCA cause as presumed drug-related. Results: Among 8195 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [51-78] years; 5540 male [67.6%]; 1304 Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander [15.9%]; 1119 Black [13.7%]; 2538 White [31.0%]) with OHCA treated by 5 EMS agencies from 2015 to 2023, 715 (8.7%) were believed by treating clinicians to have drug-related OHCA. Naloxone was administered to 1165 patients (14.2%) and was associated with increased ROSC using both nearest neighbor propensity matching (absolute risk difference [ARD], 15.2%; 95% CI, 9.9%-20.6%) and inverse propensity-weighted regression adjustment (ARD, 11.8%; 95% CI, 7.3%-16.4%). Naloxone was also associated with increased survival to hospital discharge using both nearest neighbor propensity matching (ARD, 6.2%; 95% CI, 2.3%-10.0%) and inverse propensity-weighted regression adjustment (ARD, 3.9%; 95% CI, 1.1%-6.7%). The number needed to treat with naloxone was 9 for ROSC and 26 for survival to hospital discharge. In a regression model that assessed effect modification between naloxone and presumed drug-related OHCA, naloxone was associated with improved survival to hospital discharge in both the presumed drug-related OHCA (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% CI, 1.34-4.58) and non-drug-related OHCA groups (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, naloxone administration as part of EMS management of OHCA was associated with increased rates of ROSC and increased survival to hospital discharge when evaluated using propensity score-based models. Given the lack of clinical practice data on the efficacy of naloxone in OA-OHCA and OHCA in general, these findings support further evaluation of naloxone as part of cardiac arrest care.

Emergent coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged as a rescue for refractory cardiac arrest, of which acute coronary syndrome is a common cause. Data on the coronary revascularization strategy in patients receiving ECPR remain limited. METHODS: The ECPR databases from two referral hospitals were screened for patients who underwent emergent revascularization. The baseline characteristics were matched 1:1 using propensity score between patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and those who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes, including success rate of weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), hospital survival, and midterm survival in hospital survivors, were compared between CABG and PCI. RESULTS: After matching, most of the patients (95%) had triple vessel disease. Compared with PCI (n = 40), emergent CABG (n = 40) had better early outcomes, in terms of the rates of successful ECMO weaning (71.1% vs 48.7%, P = 0.05) and hospital survival (56.4% versus 32.4%, P = 0.04). After a mean follow-up of 2 years, both revascularization strategies were associated with favourable midterm survival among hospital survivors (75.3% after CABG vs 88.9% after PCI, P = 0.49), with a trend towards fewer reinterventions in patients who underwent CABG (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received ECPR because of triple vessel disease, the hospital outcomes were better after emergent CABG than after PCI. More evidence is required to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients who receive ECPR.

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: CME Review.

ABSTRACT: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is increasingly being used for refractory cardiac arrest for both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The term eCPR refers to cannulating a patient to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit to provide perfusion after cardiac arrest refractory to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has been shown to offer increased survival benefit among a select group of adult and pediatric patients experiencing refractory cardiac arrests, both in hospital and out of hospital. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be considered when (1) the cardiac arrest is witnessed, (2) the patient receives high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (3) the patient is at or in close proximity to an ECMO center, (4) there is a reversible cause for the cardiac arrest where the perfusion from the ECMO circuit serves as a bridge to recovery, and (5) the treating facility has a robust multidisciplinary system in place to facilitate rapidly moving patients from site of arrest to site of cannulation to intensive care unit. To develop an eCPR system of care, a multidisciplinary team consisting of prehospital, emergency medicine, in-hospital, proceduralist, perfusionist, and intensive care medical professionals must be established who support the use of eCPR for refractory cardiac arrest. The future of eCPR is the development of systems of care that use eCPR for a narrow subset of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Implementing debriefing after cardiac arrest: benefits and challenges.

Healthcare professionals, including nurses, will be involved in the care and management of patients in cardiac arrest. This highly stressful and demanding situation can lead to breakdowns in communication, difficulty in decision-making and emotional distress for members of the healthcare team. Debriefing is a recommended tool that team members can use to acknowledge what went well, what could be improved and areas for learning or development. However, debriefing is often not prioritised due to pressures in clinical practice. This article discusses the benefits of debriefing and outlines some of the approaches and tools that may be used. The author argues that by recognising the importance of debriefing after cardiac arrests in the hospital setting and committing to best practices, nurses can be better prepared for the challenges of resuscitation and improve patient outcomes.

Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: 2024 update of the Utstein Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry template.

The Utstein Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Registry Template, introduced in 1991 and updated in 2004 and 2015, standardizes data collection to enable research, evaluation, and comparisons of systems of care. The impetus for the current update stemmed from significant advances in the field and insights from registry development and regional comparisons. This 2024 update involved representatives of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and used a modified Delphi process. Every 2015 Utstein data element was reviewed for relevance, priority (core or supplemental), and improvement. New variables were proposed and refined. All changes were voted on for inclusion. The 2015 domains-system, dispatch, patient, process, and outcomes-were retained. Further clarity is provided for the definitions of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended resuscitation and attempted resuscitation. Changes reflect advancements in dispatch, early response systems, and resuscitation care, as well as the importance of prehospital outcomes. Time intervals such as emergency medical service response time now emphasize precise reporting of the times used. New flowcharts aid the reporting of system effectiveness for patients with an attempted resuscitation and system efficacy for the Utstein comparator group. Recognizing the varying capacities of emergency systems globally, the writing group provided a minimal dataset for settings with developing emergency medical systems. Supplementary variables are considered useful for research purposes. These revisions aim to elevate data collection and reporting transparency by registries and researchers and to advance international comparisons and collaborations. The overarching objective remains the improvement of outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Serial paired arterial and jugular venous point-of-care values in dogs undergoing manual basic life support.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in point-of-care (POC) variables obtained from arterial and jugular venous blood in dogs undergoing manual basic life support (BLS) and report changes over time. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: Small animal research facility. ANIMALS: Twenty-four purpose-bred research dogs. INTERVENTIONS: Dogs were anesthetized, and arterial catheters were placed before euthanasia. One minute after cardiopulmonary arrest, BLS consisting of manual chest compressions and ventilation delivered via endotracheal intubation, face mask, mouth-to-nose, or no ventilation was initiated. Paired arterial and jugular venous blood samples were obtained for POC testing before euthanasia (T0), at 3 minutes (T3), and at 6 minutes (T6) into BLS. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The association of POC variables with arterial or venous sample type while controlling for type of ventilation and sampling timepoint was determined using a generalized linear mixed model. Variables obtained from arterial and venous blood samples were compared over time using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test. Pao2, anion gap, potassium, chloride, glucose concentration, and PCV were significantly higher in arterial blood samples compared with venous samples (P < 0.03). By T6, arterial glucose concentration, arterial and venous base excess, venous pH, and plasma lactate, potassium, creatinine, bicarbonate, and sodium concentrations were significantly increased, and arterial and venous Po2, ionized calcium concentration, PCV, and total plasma protein concentration were significantly decreased from T0 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although statistically significant, arteriovenous differences and changes in POC blood variables during BLS were small and not clinically relevant over time. Given the challenges of arterial blood sampling, it may be reasonable to pursue venous blood sampling during CPR. Further studies in dogs undergoing BLS and advanced life support are needed to better understand the potential clinical role of POC testing during CPR.

Mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): an umbrella review of contemporary systematic reviews and more.

BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can restore spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurological function and save lives. We conducted an umbrella review, including previously published systematic reviews (SRs), that compared mechanical and manual CPR; after that, we performed a new SR of the original studies that were not included after the last published SR to provide a panoramic view of the existing evidence on the effectiveness of CPR methods. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline were searched, including English in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) SRs, and comparing mechanical versus manual CPR. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) and GRADE were used to assess the quality of included SRs/studies. We included both IHCA and OHCA, which compared mechanical and manual CPR. We analyzed at least one of the outcomes of interest, including ROSC, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, 30-day survival, and survival to hospital discharge with good neurological function. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed for age, gender, initial rhythm, arrest location, and type of CPR devices. RESULTS: We identified 249 potentially relevant records, of which 238 were excluded. Eleven SRs were analyzed in the Umbrella review (January 2014-March 2022). Furthermore, for a new, additional SR, we identified eight eligible studies (not included in any prior SR) for an in-depth analysis between April 1, 2021, and February 15, 2024. The higher chances of using mechanical CPR for male patients were significantly observed in three studies. Two studies showed that younger patients received more mechanical treatment than older patients. However, studies did not comment on the outcomes based on the patient's gender or age. Most SRs and studies were of low to moderate quality. The pooled findings did not show the superiority of mechanical compared to manual CPR except in a few selected subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Given the significant heterogeneity and methodological limitations of the included studies and SRs, our findings do not provide definitive evidence to support the superiority of mechanical CPR over manual CPR. However, mechanical CPR can serve better where high-quality manual CPR cannot be performed in selected situations.

Exploration of alive-and-ventilator free days as an outcome measure for clinical trials of Resuscitative interventions.

BACKGROUND: Outcome selection is a critically important aspect of clinical trial design. Alive-and-ventilator free days is an outcome measure commonly used in critical care clinical trials, but has not been fully explored in resuscitation science. METHODS: A simulation study was performed to explore approaches to the definition and analysis of alive-and-ventilator free days in cardiac arrest populations. Data from an in-hospital cardiac arrest observational cohort and from the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial were used to inform and conduct the simulations and validate approaches to alive-and-ventilator free days measurement and analysis. FINDINGS: Alive-and-ventilator-free days is a flexible outcome measure in cardiac arrest populations. An approach to alive-and-ventilator free days that assigns -1 days when return of spontaneous circulation is not achieved provides a wider distribution of the outcome and improves statistical power. The optimal approach to the analysis of alive-and-ventilator free days varies based on the expected impact of the intervention under study on rates of return of spontaneous circulation, survival, and ventilator-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Alive-and-ventilator free days adds to the armamentarium of clinical trialists in the field of resuscitation science.