Fc Receptor Inhibition Reduces Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress in Human RPE Cells Treated with Bevacizumab, but not Aflibercept.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: VEGF-A is induced by oxidative stress, and functions as a survival factor for various cell types, including retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs like aflibercept and bevacizumab have shown to be most effective in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), however uptake of the drugs might lead to interference with cell physiology. Herein, we evaluated the significance of the Fc receptor (FcR) within this context and moreover explored the impact of VEGF inhibition under normal conditions as well as under oxidative stress, in terms of potential adverse effects. METHODS: ARPE-19 (human RPE) cells were treated with aflibercept and bevacizumab in presence or absence of H2O2 as oxidative stress stimulus. After 24h cells were evaluated for drug uptake, VEGF-A expression and secretion, levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as cell proliferation. Experiments were repeated with cells being pre-incubated with an FcR inhibitor prior to drug application. RESULTS: Both drugs inhibited extracellular levels of VEGF-A and were taken up into the RPE, resulting in significantly reduced intracellular levels of VEGF-A. When oxidative stress was applied, intracellular ROS levels in cells treated with both drugs rose, and cell proliferation was reduced. Prior incubation with the FcR inhibitor lessened the uptake of bevacizumab, but not aflibercept into RPE cells, and simultaneously enhanced cell survival under oxidative stress conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that uptake and accumulation of aflibercept and bevacizumab within RPE cells affect the intracellular VEGF-A metabolism negatively, leading to a biologically relevant reduced cell survival under oxidative stress. The FcR plays a substantial role in the uptake of bevacizumab, but not aflibercept, which allows an enhanced RPE cell survival through FcR blockage in an environment dominated by oxidative stress, as clinically significant for various inflammatory retinal disorders.

Incidence and risk of severe infections associated with aflibercept in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Aflibercept is an engineered humanized vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agent. Severe infections are serious adverse event associated with aflibercept. However, the contribution of aflibercept to infection is still unknown. We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing severe infections in cancer patients treated with aflibercept. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meeting were searched. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of aflibercept in cancer patients with toxicity profile on infections. Summary incidences, relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 4310 patients with a variety of solid tumours from 10 prospective clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. The incidence of high grade infections associated with aflibercept was 7.3% (95% CI 4.3, 12.0%), with a mortality of 2.2% (95% CI 1.5, 3.1%). In addition, patients treated with aflibercept had a significantly increased risk of developing high grade (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.52, 2.30; P < 0.001) and fatal (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.14, 4.11; P = 0.018) infections. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Furthermore, the risk of infections with aflibercept was substantially higher than bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Aflibercept is associated with a significant increased risk of developing severe infections in patients with solid tumours. Frequent clinical monitoring and appropriate management for infections should be emphasized during aflibercept treatment.

Ocular Hypertension Following Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: Review of the Literature and Possible Role of Nitric Oxide.

PURPOSE: To review the literature regarding ocular hypertension following intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy, and to propose a novel mechanism for the development of ocular hypertension as a result of such therapy. METHODS: The PubMed database was used to identify publications by using combinations of the search terms, "glaucoma," "ocular hypertension," "pegaptanib," "bevacizumab," "ranibizumab," "aflibercept," "anti-vascular endothelial growth factor," intraocular pressure," and "intravitreal." The reference lists of these publications were also reviewed for relevant articles. RESULTS: Numerous articles have been published describing ocular hypertension, either immediate-term/short-term or delayed/sustained, following intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Ocular hypertension has been reported following intravitreal pegaptanib, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab, and aflibercept. On the basis of the fact that vascular endothelial growth factor, normally present as a vascular modulating and reparative growth factor, is known to upregulate endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase, and that NO has been shown to decrease intraocular pressure in both normal and glaucomatous human and animal eyes, we propose a novel mechanism for sustained ocular hypertension following intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. We propose that such intravitreal therapy may lead to decreased NO in the anterior segment, which then leads to trabecular meshwork constriction, decreased outflow facility, and increased intraocular pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained ocular hypertension following the intravitreal administration of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents is a potentially serious side effect that has not been adequately explained. Further investigation is necessary to determine the role of NO in the mediation of this adverse effect.

Systemic Safety of Prolonged Monthly Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is commonly used to treat numerous retinal conditions and appears safe, yet controversy remains regarding systemic safety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the systemic safety of intravitreous anti-VEGF injections in high-risk patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and to investigate separately the subgroup of these patients with the highest level of exposure to anti-VEGF monthly treatment for 2 years. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clincaltrials.gov, and ophthalmology congress abstracts January 1, 1947, to May 19, 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials were selected that evaluated monthly anti-VEGF injections for DME for 2 years and reported the outcome measures of cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, arteriothrombotic events, and mortality. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers collected data independently from each study for the meta-analysis. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects model and analyzed from November 6, 2014, to June 28, 2015. Peto odds ratios with 95% CIs were calculated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points included cerebrovascular accidents and all-cause mortality in the highest-dose arms. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarctions, arteriothrombotic events, and vascular-related death. RESULTS: Of 1126 articles reviewed, 598 were removed as duplicate studies and 524, for lack of monthly treatment data for 2 years, leaving 4 studies for the meta-analysis that met the search criteria: 2 trials using monthly aflibercept and 2 using monthly ranibizumab, representing 1328 patients. The primary evaluation (1078 patients) combined the monthly aflibercept and the 0.5-mg ranibizumab arms and yielded an increased risk for death compared with sham and laser treatments (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% CI, 1.44-6.14; P = .003). Analysis including monthly aflibercept and 0.5-mg ranibizumab yielded an increased risk for cerebrovascular accidents (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.04-5.22; P = .04) and vascular death (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.08-5.82; P = .03). No definitive increased risk for myocardial infarctions and arteriothrombotic events was seen with all dose combinations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this meta-analysis of anti-VEGF agents for patients with DME, assessment of the highest-level exposure group (those high-risk patients with DME who received 2 years of monthly treatment) revealed a possible increased risk for death and potentially for cerebrovascular accidents. Consideration of total exposure to anti-VEGF agents when treating those at high risk for vascular disease may be important.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 52-Week Results of the VIBRANT Study.

PURPOSE: To determine week 52 efficacy and safety outcomes in eyes with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with grid laser. DESIGN: VIBRANT was a double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes randomized and treated in VIBRANT were followed to week 52. METHODS: In the IAI group, eyes received IAI every 4 weeks through week 24 and IAI every 8 weeks through week 48 with rescue grid laser if needed at week 36. In the grid laser group, all eyes received grid laser at baseline and, if prespecified rescue criteria were met, 1 additional laser from week 12 to 20 and IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses from week 24 onward (the laser/IAI group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score ≥15 at week 24. All outcome measures at week 52 were exploratory, and P values are considered nominal. RESULTS: The percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline letter score ≥15 in the IAI and laser/IAI groups was 52.7% versus 26.7% (P = 0.0003) at week 24 and 57.1% versus 41.1% (P = 0.0296) at week 52. The corresponding mean change from baseline BCVA letter score was 17.0 versus 6.9 (P < 0.0001) at week 24 and 17.1 versus 12.2 (P = 0.0035) at week 52. The mean reduction from baseline central retinal thickness was 280.5 µm versus 128.0 µm (P < 0.0001) at week 24 and 283.9 µm versus 249.3 µm (P = 0.0218) at week 52. In the IAI group, 10.6% of eyes received rescue laser at week 36, and in the laser/IAI group, 80.7% received rescue IAI from week 24 to week 48. Traumatic cataract in 1 eye (1.1%) in the IAI group was the only ocular serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 monthly IAI, injections every 8 weeks maintained control of macular edema and visual benefits through week 52. In the laser group, rescue IAI given from week 24 onward resulted in substantial visual improvements at week 52.

Phase I Dose-Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous Aflibercept in Combination with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I study (EudraCT No. 2006-001177-25) investigated aflibercept, a vascular endothelial growth factor decoy receptor protein (VEGF Trap), in combination with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 2, 4, or 6 mg/kg of intravenous aflibercept with docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 in 3-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1 and to determine the recommended phase II dose. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and antitumor activity were also investigated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled and treated (29 patients in a dose-escalation phase and 15 patients in an expansion cohort). Following three cases of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving aflibercept at 4 mg/kg, the protocol was amended to allow earlier granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (from day 6) and prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Subsequently, there were two DLTs: febrile neutropenia (2 mg/kg) and grade 4 pulmonary embolism (6 mg/kg). An excess of free over VEGF-bound aflibercept was observed at 6 mg/kg. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (54.5%), lymphopenia (47.7%), and stomatitis (38.6%). AEs associated with VEGF blockade (any grade) included epistaxis (61.4%), dysphonia (40.9%), hypertension (38.6%), and proteinuria (11.4%). There were 15 partial responses, including 9 in patients with gastroesophageal cancers. Thirteen patients had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Aflibercept 6 mg/kg administered every 3 weeks in combination with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5- fluorouracil is the recommended dose for further clinical development based on tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Treatment-Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 12-Month Safety and Efficacy Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept for treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized clinical trial included 49 patients with treatment-resistant nAMD who received 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept as 3 monthly loading doses, followed by injections every 2 months over 12 months. Inclusion criteria included active nAMD on fluorescein angiography at baseline and persistent intra- or subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT) for ≥ 6 months prior to baseline with a minimum of 4 injections of bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab. Patients were assessed monthly for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) measured with OCT and occurrence of adverse events. Retinal pigment epithelium atrophy (RPEA) was assessed at baseline and at 12 months. RESULTS: Mean BCVA improved by 4.7 letters (95% CI: 2.1-7.3, p < 0.001) and CRT decreased by 97.2 µm (95% CI: 54.4-140.1, p < 0.001) at 12 months compared to baseline. Median RPEA area increased by 0.48 mm2 (range = -0.1 to 19.9, p < 0.001). There was 1 arterial thromboembolic event and 2 cases of submacular haemorrhage. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of treatment-resistant nAMD patients, intravitreal aflibercept was effective in improving vision and reducing exudation. Early visual and anatomic outcomes may predict longer-term response to treatment, but further assessment is required.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Neovascular AMD: Short-Term Clinical Effects of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection as a Predictor of Long-Term Results.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between early response to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and long-term visual outcomes PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with nAMD participated in this prospective clinical trial. All patients received three initial monthly IAIs, followed by IAIs at 8-week intervals. Study visits were scheduled at 1 week, followed by every 2 weeks for the first 3 months and then every 4 weeks until the conclusion of the study at 48 weeks. RESULTS: Eight eyes (47%) were dry on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography by week 2 (early responders), and the remaining nine eyes took an average of 7.5 weeks for fluid resolution (late responders). The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the final visit was +11.9 letters from baseline (P = .002). Average BCVA gain in early responders was +11.6 letters compared to +12.2 letters in late responders (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was not a statistically significant correlation between early response to IAI and better long-term outcomes, both early and late responders maintained excellent visual outcomes at 48 weeks.

Fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan associated with aflibercept can induce microscopic colitis in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein that acts as a soluble decoy receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This molecule binds to all isoforms of VEGF-A as well as VEGF-B and placental growth factor, preventing them from activating their respective receptors. Aflibercept is used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in association with irinotecan. For reasons that remain to be elucidated, the addition of aflibercept to irinotecan-based chemotherapy increases the incidence of grade 3-4 diarrhea. We performed systematic colonic biopsies in three patients with grade 3 diarrhea after introduction of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and aflibercept treatment for mCRC. For each patient, the diarrhea necessitated treatment discontinuation. Colonoscopy showed normal colonic mucosa. However, histopathological examination of the biopsies performed in these three patients revealed typical features of microscopic colitis. All three patients were treated with budesonide and mesalazine, leading to rapid regression of clinical symptoms. Chemotherapy was reintroduced in all patients, with only mild, grade 1 diarrhea under mesalazine and budesonide treatment. These are the first observations of aflibercept-induced microscopic colitis, and support the use of specific treatment on top of anti-diarrheal treatment in case of important digestive adverse events.

Treatment of Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration: Focus on Aflibercept.

A formulation of aflibercept for intravitreal injection (Eylea) is approved for the treatment of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Aflibercept has a significantly higher affinity for Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A compared with other monoclonal anti-VEGF antibodies. In addition to binding all VEGF-A isoforms, aflibercept also blocks other proangiogenic factors such as VEGF-B and placental growth factor. The VIEW 1 and 2 trials showed this drug achieves improved results in patients with exudative AMD similar to those obtained with monthly ranibizumab, using a bimonthly treatment regimen after a loading dose of three intravitreal injections, which translates to less use of healthcare resources. There is a subgroup of patients that present with persistent fluid after the loading dose that could benefit from monthly injections or personalized proactive treatment after the first year. In the second year of treatment, the Treat and Extend patterns can permit even more lengthening of the time between injections. More data are needed to confirm the optimal monitoring and retreatment dosing, to maintain long-term efficacy. Other preliminary data suggest that patients that do not respond to other anti-angiogenics and patients with special pathologies such as polypoidal choroidopathy or retinal angiomatous proliferation can improve upon switching to aflibercept. To date, the safety profile of aflibercept is excellent and is comparable to other anti-angiogenic treatments.

Anti-VEGF Molecules for the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents the most common cause of vision loss in patients affected by diabetes mellitus. Although the pathophysiology of DME is not wholly understood, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been identified as a key contributor to the development of DME. In addition, latest information suggests that acute and chronic inflammatory changes occur, contributing to the DME pathogenesis. The current therapeutic approach for DME is mainly based on the administration of anti-VEGF molecules. In particular, VEGF-inhibitors that have been studied for diabetic retinopathy include pegaptanib, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept. The present review analyzes the main characteristics of each molecule, describing the most important results of clinical trails.

Aflibercept (Eylea) and diabetic macular oedema. A first-choice VEGF inhibitor in case of marked visual loss.

Overall, VEGF inhibitors administered by intravitreal injection have a similar harm-benefit balance. However, a publicly funded trial has shown that aflibercept is more effective than ranibizumab and bevacizumab in patients with marked loss of visual acuity.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety markers in a phase II study of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with aflibercept in the first-line setting.

BACKGROUND: Aflibercept (ziv-aflibercept) is an anti-angiogenic agent recently approved in combination with FOLFIRI for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients previously treated with oxaliplatin. Despite heterogeneity in response to aflibercept, no biomarkers for efficacy or adverse effects have been identified. Here we present biomarker data from the randomised phase II AFFIRM trial assessing aflibercept in combination with mFOLFOX6 first line in mCRC. METHODS: Ninety-six somatic mutations in key oncogenic drivers of mCRC and 133 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway genes were analysed, and 27 plasma markers measured at baseline, during and after treatment. We assessed correlations of these three classes of biomarkers with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Somatic mutations identified in KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA and PIK3R1 did not significantly correlate with PFS (multiple testing-adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) or multiple testing-adjusted FDR>0.3). None of the individual SNPs correlated with PFS (multiple testing-adjusted FDR>0.22), but at the gene level variability in VEGFB significantly correlated with PFS (multiple testing-adjusted FDR=0.0423). Although none of the plasma markers measured at baseline significantly correlated with PFS, high levels of circulating IL8 at baseline together with increased levels of IL8 during treatment were significantly associated with reduced PFS (multiple testing-adjusted FDR=0.0478). No association was found between biomarkers and AEs. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first biomarker study in mCRC treated with aflibercept. High IL8 plasma levels at baseline and subsequent increases in IL8 were associated with worse PFS, suggesting that IL8 may act as a potentially predictive biomarker of aflibercept treatment outcome.

The role of aflibercept in the management of diabetic macular edema.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents one of the leading causes of visual impairment in working-age adults. Although there are several proven treatments available for this condition, pharmacotherapy through the use of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents has revolutionized the management of DME over the past decade with superior outcomes compared to laser therapy. This review summarizes the pathophysiology and available treatment options for the management of DME, with an emphasis on the efficacy and safety profile of a single particular intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agent, aflibercept.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 100-Week Results From the VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Two similarly designed, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME). PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes; n=872) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who had DME with central involvement. METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. This report presents the 100-week results including mean change from baseline in BCVA, proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters, and proportion of eyes with a ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 100 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 11.5, 11.1, and 0.9 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 11.4, 9.4, and 0.7 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters from baseline at week 100 was 38.3%, 33.1%, and 13.0% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 38.2%, 31.1%, and 12.1% (P ≤ 0.0001) in VIVID. The proportion of eyes that lost ≥15 letters at week 100 was 3.2%, 0.7%, and 9.7% (P ≤ 0.0220) in VISTA and 2.2%, 1.5%, and 12.9% (P ≤ 0.0008) in VIVID. Significantly more eyes in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus those in the laser control group had a ≥2 step improvement in the DRSS score in both VISTA (37.0% and 37.1% vs. 15.6%; P < 0.0001) and VIVID (29.3% and 32.6% vs. 8.2%; P ≤ 0.0004). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent serious ocular adverse event was cataract (2.4%, 1.0%, and 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). CONCLUSIONS: In both VISTA and VIVID, the 52-week visual and anatomic superiority of IAI over laser control was sustained through week 100, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups. Safety in these studies was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

Aflibercept: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein that acts as a soluble decoy receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a key regulator of angiogenesis. It binds to all isoforms of VEGF-A as well as VEGF-B and placental growth factor, and, thus, prevents them from binding to and activating their cognate receptors. In the USA and EU, intravenously administered aflibercept in combination with an infusion of leucovorin, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is resistant to or has progressed after treatment with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. The efficacy of aflibercept in this indication was assessed in a multinational, pivotal phase 3 trial (VELOUR), in which the approved regimen of aflibercept 4 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus FOLFIRI significantly prolonged median overall survival by 1.44 months compared with FOLFIRI alone (primary endpoint). The addition of aflibercept also significantly prolonged progression-free survival and significantly increased the objective response rate compared with FOLFIRI alone. Addition of aflibercept to FOLFIRI was associated with anti-VEGF-related adverse events and an increased incidence of FOLFIRI-related adverse events, but the tolerability of the combination was generally acceptable in this pre-treated population. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI included neutropenia, diarrhoea and hypertension. In conclusion, aflibercept plus FOLFIRI is a useful treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen, with or without bevacizumab.

Aflibercept for metastatic colorectal cancer: safety data from the Spanish named patient program.

OBJECTIVE: Aflibercept increased overall survival with acceptable tolerability in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when it was used in combination with FOLFIRI after progression on a first-line oxaliplatin regimen (VELOUR study). The safety profile of aflibercept in day-to-day clinical practice was assessed. DESIGN AND METHODS: A named patient program provided early access to aflibercept to mCRC patients in Spain before its commercialization. Patients received aflibercept 4 mg/kg intravenous + FOLFIRI every 2 weeks as second-line treatment. A descriptive safety analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Data from 89 mCRC patients were analyzed (male: 61.8%; median age: 62 years [interquartile range: 55, 67]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 - 1: 95.5%). Fifty four (60.7%) patients presented ≥ 2 metastasis [liver (83.1%), lung (44.9%) or lymph nodes (33.7%)]. Most patients had previously received bevacizumab (60.7%) or anti-EGFR (19.1%) therapy. Patients received a median of 6.0 (interquartile range: 4, 13) cycles of FOLFIRI + aflibercept. Most grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were reported during the initial cycles of treatment. AEs possibly related to treatment occurred in 39 (43.8%) patients. Common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (7.9%), diarrhea (4.5%) and hypertension (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, aflibercept + FOLFIRI is well tolerated, with a manageable toxicity profile. The safety results confirm the findings from the confirmatory VELOUR trial.

Aflibercept: A Review of Its Use in Diabetic Macular Oedema.

Aflibercept (Eylea(®)) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent indicated for intravitreal use in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema. In patients with diabetic macular oedema, significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 52 in visual acuity were seen with intravitreal aflibercept versus macular laser photocoagulation in the phase III VISTA-DME and VIVID-DME trials, and versus intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab in those with worse visual acuity at baseline (i.e. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score of <69) in the phase III PROTOCOL-T trial. Intravitreal aflibercept was generally well tolerated in patients with diabetic macular oedema. In conclusion, intravitreal aflibercept is an important new treatment for diabetic macular oedema.