Challenges in implementing treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis: a perspective from Brazilian rheumatologists.

BACKGROUND: Patient management in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved to a "treat-to-target" (T2T) approach, which entails intensive treatment and regular follow-up with the goal of achieving low levels of disease activity or clinical remission. Even though a T2T approach is endorsed by professional organizations and yields superior outcomes, its implementation remains incomplete. EVEREST (EleVatE care in RhEumatoid arthritiS with Treat-to-target) is a quality-improvement initiative designed to improve the widespread implementation of a personalized T2T strategy and enable patients with RA to reach their full potential for remission. We describe the Brazilian results from the Global T2T Survey, first part of the EVEREST program. METHODS: Between June and September 2022, we conducted an online survey targeting rheumatologists in Brazil. Our objective was to evaluate the barriers and knowledge gaps hindering the effective implementation of T2T strategies. To achieve this, we employed a set of multiple-choice questions specifically crafted to elicit responses categorized in a structured order. RESULTS: 166 rheumatologists participated in the survey, 51% of them with more than 21 years of experience in rheumatology. Regarding the perceived challenges in the management of RA in clinical practice, the highest percentage of agreement/strong agreement among the participants was related to the contradictory results of disease activity measures (60%). In terms of the main barriers to assess the disease activity in clinical practice, the lack of adherence to treatment and contradictory assessments between patient-reported outcomes and composite measures were indicated by 75% and 59% of the participants, respectively, as a moderate/serious barrier. The most frequently knowledge and skill gaps related to the management of RA pointed out by the participants were on the difficulty to assess patients' health literacy (54% stated to have no more than intermediate knowledge on standardized methods to assess it and 43% no more than intermediate skills on determining the level of health literacy of the patients). In general, the use of tools to support the management of RA patients in clinical practice was indicated to be unusual by the participants. Self-reflection questionnaires, patient education materials and treatment consideration checklists were pointed out as the least frequently used tools (85%, 64% and 62% of the participants stated to use them never, rarely, or only sometimes, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a greater need for design, selection, and uptake of practical strategies to further improve communication between healthcare providers and patients with RA, as well as for promoting well-informed, collaborative decision-making in their care.

Peri-Arthroscopic Management of Immunosuppressive Medications in Patients with Rheumatic Disease A Survey of Practice Trends Among Rheumatologists and Sports Medicine Orthopedic Surgeons.

PURPOSE: Rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons frequently collaborate on difficult decisions regarding perioperative management of immunosuppression in rheumatic disease patients, balancing risk of postoperative infection with risk of disease flares. Current evidence-based guidelines pertain specifically to arthroplasty, thus we sought to understand the trends and common practices regarding peri-arthroscopic use of immunosuppression. METHODS: Rheumatologists and sports medicine surgeons, from a variety of New York hospitals and serving a broad range of demographics, were surveyed on immunosuppressive medication management in rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries. Physicians' preferences were elicited regarding the use of common anti-rheumatic medications with the lower risk meniscectomies and the higher risk anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions and allografts. Physicians were asked specifically about peri-arthroscopic use of conventional synthetic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologics, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. RESULTS: During the survey period, 25 rheumatologists and 19 sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. For lower-risk arthroscopies, rheumatologists favored continuing various csDMARDs (72% to 100%), biologics (50% to 64%) and JAK inhibitors (57%), while a majority of surgeons concurred for all three drug classes (csDMARDs 63%; biologics 53%; and JAK inhibitors 58%). For higher-risk arthroscopies, most rheumatologists preferred that patients continue csDMARDs (63% to 100%) but fewer supported the use of biologics (28% to 39%) or JAK inhibitors (22%). Surgeons were more hesitant to endorse any class of immunosuppressive antirheumatic medications (22% to 27%) around these higher risk surgeries. The rheumatologists were most concerned about surgeries taking place too soon after the last dose of rituximab, recommending these higher risk surgeries not take place for 7.7 ± 8.8 weeks following the last infusion. CONCLUSION: For lower-risk arthroscopies, most rheumatologists but only about half of orthopedic surgeons preferred patients continuing csDMARDs. Approximately half of both groups preferred patients hold biologics and JAK inhibitors. In more involved arthroscopies, most rheumatologists but few orthopedists supported the continued use of csDMARDs, and the consensus was to hold all other immunosuppression when possible. While the duration medications were held perioperatively were somewhat reflective of the current guidelines for arthroplasty, there is a need for evidencebased guidelines specifically regarding peri-arthroscopy immunosuppression in rheumatic disease patients.

Principles of clinical genetics for rheumatologists: clinical indications and interpretation of broad-based genetic testing.

Advances in DNA sequencing technologies, especially next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is the basis for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), have profoundly transformed immune-mediated rheumatic disease diagnosis. Recently, substantial cost reductions have facilitated access to these diagnostic tools, expanded the capacity of molecular diagnostics and enabled the pursuit of precision medicine in rheumatology. Understanding the fundamental principles of genetics and diversity in genetic variant classification is a crucial milestone in rheumatology. However, despite the growing availability of DNA sequencing platforms, a significant number of autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), neuromuscular disorders, hereditary collagen diseases, and monogenic bone diseases remain unsolved, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) pose a formidable challenge to addressing these unmet needs in the coming decades. This article aims to provide an overview of the clinical indications and interpretation of comprehensive genetic testing in the medical field, addressing the related complexities and implications.

Approach to interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis-A survey to pulmonologists and rheumatologists in Colombia.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding screening, rescreening, diagnosis, and follow-up practices in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) in Colombia. METHODS: A structured survey focused on clinical practices in patients with SSc-ILD was conducted. Members of the Asociación Colombiana de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax (Asoneumocito) and the Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología (Asoreuma) were invited to participate from March 2023 to May 2023. RESULTS: We surveyed 51 pulmonologists and 44 rheumatologists. Overall, 51.6% reported having access to multidisciplinary team discussion in ILD. Among the 95 participants, 78.9% would routinely perform a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest once a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis was established. This practice is more frequent among rheumatologists (84.1%) than among pulmonologists (74.5%). Approximately half of the participants would rescreen patients annually with computed tomography scan (56.8%) if baseline images were negative. Spirometry (81.1%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (80.0%), and 6-min walk test (55.8%) were the most frequently performed tests upon diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. During follow-up, participants would consider repeating pulmonary function tests mostly every 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of SSc-ILD is high among pulmonologists and rheumatologists. Decision-making on diagnosis and follow-up is similar between specialties, but there are variations in their frequency and indications. Further research is needed to evaluate how to adapt recommendations for assessing SSc-ILD in different settings.

SGLT-2 inhibitors: new horizons for rheumatologists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications initially developed for the treatment of diabetes, although their cardiac and renal protective benefits are far reaching. There has been marked interest in the rheumatology community to adopt these medications into our clinical practice, particularly for chronic kidney disease with persistent proteinuria. RECENT FINDINGS: SGLT2 inhibitors have been approved for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the setting of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as chronic kidney disease with proteinuria. Large studies on SGLT2 inhibitors have largely excluded patients with proteinuric chronic kidney disease due to autoimmune glomerulonephritis due to concerns for confounding from immunosuppression. The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in CKD Trial (DAPA-CKD) showed that SGLT2 inhibition decreased progression of renal disease in patients with IgA nephropathy. Expanding this to other autoimmune glomerulonephropathies, several small studies have shown improvements in proteinuria in patients with lupus nephritis treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. A study evaluating safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with lupus identified no specific concerns even with concomitant use of immunosuppression. SUMMARY: Small studies have shown that SGLT2 inhibitors can been utilized safely and efficaciously in patients with lupus nephritis. Additional research is needed to identify where these medications fit into the rheumatology treatment armamentarium.

Traditional Chinese medicine for sjögren's syndrome: a national survey of attitudes and perceptions among Chinese patients and rheumatologists.

BACKGROUND: This study explored similarities and differences among Chinese patients and rheumatologists in their attitudes towards and perceptions of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for Sjögren's syndrome (SS), including analyzing factors that influenced their decision making. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was used to conduct a multicenter survey among patients with SS at three tertiary care medical centers in Beijing and among rheumatology clinicians at several hospitals across China. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 942 valid questionnaires from patients from 31 provinces and cities in China, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1:14, a mean age of 48.81 years, and a median disease duration of 7 (4, 10) years. There were 320 valid questionnaires from rheumatologists, covering 30 provinces and cities in China, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 0.87:1, a mean age of 48 years, and a median work duration of 10.5 (6, 15) years. The rheumatologists treated a median of 15 (11, 50) SS cases per month, and the median proportion of SS to all rheumatic diseases was 6.66% (6-10%). Many patients believed TCM could cure the root of the disease, and the most expected TCM therapies were TCM patent prescriptions and medicinal teas. Conversely, rheumatologists placed high value on the efficacy of TCM, and most commonly prescribed Chinese herbal decoctions. Most doctor-patient groups were positive about TCM treatment, citing the low side effects as the major advantage. Regression analysis showed that for patients over 40 years old with a course of disease > 4 years, the probability of using TCM has increased by 1-6 times; the probability of recommending TCM in clinical work of doctors who have worked for more than 15 years, TCM and integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine has increased 1-2 times. CONCLUSIONS: TCM has become widely accepted and earned attention from doctor-patient groups, especially among older patients and experienced rheumatologists. However, negative prejudices and absence of accurate information about TCM treatments and SS itself require improvement. The contradiction between TCM dosage form and efficacy is a major problem, and patient demand for convenient and efficient TCM patent preparations suggests future work should focus on developing TCM patent preparations with clear compositions and mechanisms.

Evaluation of pediatric rheumatologists' approach to rituximab use: a questionnaire study.

Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 antigen on B cells and is used in various autoimmune disorders. In this study, we aimed to measure the awareness of pediatric rheumatologists about the use of RTX through a survey. Between February and March 2023, a 42-question survey was sent via email to pediatric rheumatology specialists in Turkey. The participants were questioned for which diagnoses and system involvement they preferred to use RTX, which routine tests they performed, vaccination policy, and adverse events that occurred during or after infusion. Forty-one pediatric rheumatologists answered the survey. They prescribed RTX most frequently for systemic lupus erythematosus (87.8%) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (9.8%). Prior to the administration of RTX, 95% of clinicians checked renal and liver function tests, as well as immunoglobulin levels. The most frequently tested hepatitis markers before treatment were HBsAg and anti-HBs antibody (97.6%), while 85.4% of rheumatologists checked for anti-HCV. Clinicians (31.4%) reported that they postpone RTX infusion 2 weeks following an inactivated vaccine. Sixty-one percent of rheumatologists reported starting RTX treatment 1 month after live vaccines, while 26.8% waited 6 months. The most frequent adverse events were an allergic reaction during RTX infusion (65.9%), hypogammaglobulinemia (46.3%), and rash (36.6%). In the event of hypogammaglobulinemia after RTX treatment, physicians reported that they frequently (58.5%) continued RTX after intravenous immunoglobulin administration. CONCLUSIONS: RTX has become a common treatment option in pediatric rheumatology in recent years. Treatment management may vary between clinician such as vaccination and routine tests. WHAT IS KNOWN: • During the course of rituximab therapy, clinicians should be attentive to specific considerations in pre-treatment, during administration, and in post-treatment patient monitoring. WHAT IS NEW: • There are differences in practice among clinicians in the management of RTX therapy. These practice disparities have the potential to impact the optimal course of treatment. • This study highlights that standardized guidelines are needed for RTX treatment in pediatric rheumatology, particularly for vaccination policies and routine tests.

Knowledge, perceptions, and practices of axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and management among healthcare professionals: an online cross-sectional survey.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of inflammatory disorders, including axial SpA (axSpA), characterized by inflammation in the spine and sacroiliac joints. Healthcare professionals have a crucial role in diagnosing and managing axSpA. Assessing their knowledge, perceptions, and practices is essential to enhance patient care. The objective of this study is to evaluate these factors by conducting an online survey. This online survey was performed using SurveyMonkey.com to assess healthcare professionals' knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to axSpA diagnosis, management, and monitoring. The questionnaire included questions about definitions, management strategies, monitoring approaches, treatment options, and barriers to care. Convenience sampling was used, and the data were analyzed descriptively by Microsoft Excel. One hundred sixty-four healthcare professionals participated; most respondents were rheumatologists from various geographic locations (27 countries). Most participants were familiar with axSpA definitions and diagnostic criteria, demonstrating high expertise. Variations were seen in follow-up intervals and diagnostic preferences, reflecting clinical heterogeneity. Seventy-two (43.9%) individuals had a multidisciplinary team, frequently including rheumatologists, physiotherapists, and radiologists. Of the participants, 73 (44.5%) had online/telephone follow-up sessions. The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment approaches varied, pointing to the importance of personalized care. Glucocorticoid use varied among countries. Recognizing inflammatory back pain, interpreting radiographs, and diagnosing early was essential to medical education. This study provides beneficial data on healthcare professionals' knowledge, perceptions, and practices regarding axSpA. While diagnostic familiarity and multidisciplinary approach are positives, there is a potential to standardize management, improve telemedicine services, remove barriers to physical activity, and optimize treatment options.

Telerheumatology Shared-Care Model: Leveraging the Expertise of an Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-Trained Extended Role Practitioner in Rural-Remote Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: A shortage of rheumatologists has led to gaps in inflammatory arthritis (IA) care in Canada. Amplified in rural-remote communities, the number of rheumatologists practicing rurally has not been meaningfully increased, and alternate care strategies must be adopted. In this retrospective chart review, we describe the impact of a shared-care telerheumatology model using a community-embedded Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-extended role practitioner (ERP) and an urban-based rheumatologist. METHODS: A rheumatologist and an ACPAC-ERP established a monthly half-day hub-and-spoke-telerheumatology clinic to care for patients with suspected IA, triaged by the ACPAC-ERP. Comprehensive initial assessments were conducted in-person by the ACPAC-ERP (spoke); investigations were completed prior to the telerheumatology visit. Subsequent collaborative visits occurred with the rheumatologist (hub) attending virtually. Retrospective analysis of demographics, time-to-key care indices, patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and estimated travel savings was performed. RESULTS: Data from 124 patients seen between January 2013 and January 2022 were collected; 98% (n = 494/504 visits) were virtual. The average age of patients at first visit was 55.6 years, and 75.8% were female. IA/connective tissue disease (CTD) was confirmed in 65% of patients. Mean time from primary care referral to ACPAC-ERP assessment was 52.5 days, and mean time from ACPAC-ERP assessment to the telerheumatology visit was 64.5 days. An estimated 493,470 km of patient-related travel was avoided. CONCLUSION: An ACPAC-ERP (spoke) and rheumatologist (hub) telerheumatology model of care assessing and managing patients with suspected IA in rural-remote Ontario was described. This model can be leveraged to increase capacity by delivering comprehensive virtual rheumatologic care in underserved communities.

Addressing the unspoken: sexual dysfunction in men with systemic lupus erythematosus, a call to action for rheumatologists.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction (SD) is highly prevalent and multifactorial; nevertheless, recent research has shed light on a notable phenomenon: male patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exhibit an elevated prevalence of sexual function disorders compared with the general population. Despite this recognition, the precise nature and extent of this association remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVES: This comprehensive review aims to clarify the link by providing an overview of the fundamental components of normal male sexual function, delving into the pathogenesis of male SD and exploring the primary factors predisposing male SLE patients to SD. Additionally, the review offers insights into potential screening, diagnostic, and treatment strategies based on the current body of literature. METHODS: A meticulous search of relevant literature was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. RESULTS: Studies exploring the correlation between SLE and SD in both genders have revealed a nearly 2-fold increased risk of SD among individuals with SLE compared with healthy counterparts. Moreover, these studies suggest that male SLE patients may have a higher susceptibility to SD, with reported prevalence ranging from 12% to 68%, compared with 0% to 22% in healthy individuals. Male patients with SLE are influenced by a spectrum of pathological factors, including pharmacological, psychological, and disease-related determinants, which, through their intricate interplay, elevate the likelihood of developing SD. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals must remain vigilant in understanding the intricacies of human sexuality and its dysfunction, particularly in males with SLE. The objective is to establish effective and potentially standardized methods for promptly diagnosing and optimally managing SD, recognizing its significant impact on the quality of life for males living with SLE. The pivotal role of rheumatologists in initiating discussions about sexual health, diagnosing SD, investigating causes, and implementing tailored strategies is underscored as crucial in addressing this multifaceted issue.

Australian rheumatologists' perception of autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an effective treatment for systemic sclerosis (SSc); however, treatment-related toxicity remains a key issue. AIMS: To investigate the perceptions of rheumatologists on the use of AHSCT for SSc. METHODS: Australian rheumatologists were asked for their opinion on the role of AHSCT, the indications for treatment and the barriers to the use of AHSCT for SSc. A secondary analysis assessed what factors influenced the perception of AHSCT. RESULTS: A total of 77.8% rheumatologists agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that AHSCT is an accepted treatment for SSc. While 65.1% agreed or strongly agreed that treatment-associated mortality was a significant barrier to referral for AHSCT, only 15.2% agreed or strongly agreed that this risk was unacceptable. Progressive lung or skin disease, or lack of response to other therapies, were considered the main referral criteria. A total of 92.0% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that reduction of treatment toxicity would increase their likelihood to refer patients for AHSCT. Rheumatologists who were aware of the correct evidence base were more likely to consider AHSCT an acceptable treatment for SSc (4.21 ± 0.7 vs 3.64 ± 0.9, P = 0.007). Rheumatologists desire improved patient selection criteria and access to treatment. CONCLUSION: In this national survey of rheumatologists, AHSCT is considered an accepted therapy. However, concern about toxicity remains a potential barrier to patient referral. Access, studies to refine patient selection and development of AHSCT protocols that improve safety were identified as key areas of need.

Patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions on dose reduction of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The recommended dose of a rituximab course for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) consists of two infusions of 1000 mg with a 2-week interval. Evidence is growing that a lower dose could be as effective. We aimed to investigate patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions on dose reduction of rituximab. METHODS: Patients with RA treated with rituximab, and rheumatologists were invited for a qualitative study via individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited based on purposive sampling to ensure diversity. Interviews were analysed according to the principles of grounded theory and the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Sixteen patients and 13 rheumatologists were interviewed. Patients and rheumatologists perceived the benefits of rituximab dose reduction for reasons of safety and societal costs. Furthermore, available evidence for the effectiveness of lower doses was mentioned as an argument in favour, in addition to the possibility to tailor the dose based on the patients' clinical manifestations. However, patients and rheumatologists had concerns about the potential loss of effectiveness and quality of life. Moreover, some rheumatologists felt uncomfortable with dose reduction due to insufficient experience with rituximab in general. Patients and rheumatologists emphasised the importance of shared decision-making, underscoring the pivotal role of physicians in this process by explaining the reasoning behind dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Although some concerns on effectiveness were perceived, both patients and rheumatologists saw potential benefits of dose reduction in terms of safety, societal costs, and application of a personalised approach. As a result, most rheumatologists and patients showed a willingness to consider dose reduction strategies.

The power of us: breaking barriers and bridging the gap of ultrasound in rheumatology to empower a new generation.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) knowledge, attitudes, and practices among young rheumatologists in Mexico, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators to its clinical use. METHODS: An online survey distributed to a network of young rheumatologists captured demographics, institutional, and personal MSUS information. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with positive MSUS attitudes. RESULTS: Ninety-six rheumatologists (39.18% national response rate) completed the survey. Of respondents (54.2% females, median age 35.1 years), 81.2% deemed MSUS necessary in clinical rheumatology. The main barriers included limited training access (56.2%) and required training time (54.1%). Lack of scientific evidence was not a major barrier (60.4%). Positive MSUS attitudes were associated with learning from conferences (p = 0.029) and colleagues (p = 0.005), formal (p = 0.043), and in-person training (p = 0.020), MSUS use in practice (p = 0.027), and use by radiologists in their institute (p < 0.001). Interest in learning MSUS (88.5%) was significantly higher in those with positive attitudes (94.4%, p < 0.001). Elastic net analysis identified key drivers, including learning MSUS from conferences, colleagues, and in residency; using MSUS in practice; respondent-performed MSUS; and MSUS use by radiologists. Statistically significant associations were found with using MSUS for synovitis/inflammatory joint disease (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.00-2.05) and MSUS use by radiologists in respondent's institutes (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.20-2.90). CONCLUSION: Most young rheumatologists in Mexico recognize the necessity of MSUS in clinical practice. By addressing identified barriers, encouraging rheumatologist-radiologist collaboration, and establishing a regulatory body to certify rheumatologist's MSUS experience, there is an opportunity to empower them with the necessary skills for effective MSUS use, ultimately benefiting patient care.

ChatGPT4's proficiency in addressing patients' questions on systemic lupus erythematosus: a blinded comparative study with specialists.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots like ChatGPT4 in specialized medical consultations, particularly in rheumatology, remains underexplored. This study compares the proficiency of ChatGPT4' responses with practicing rheumatologists to inquiries from patients with SLE. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we curated 95 frequently asked questions (FAQs), including 55 in Chinese and 40 in English. Responses for FAQs from ChatGPT4 and five rheumatologists were scored separately by a panel of rheumatologists and a group of patients with SLE across six domains (scientific validity, logical consistency, comprehensibility, completeness, satisfaction level and empathy) on a 0-10 scale (a score of 0 indicates entirely incorrect responses, while 10 indicates accurate and comprehensive answers). RESULTS: Rheumatologists' scoring revealed that ChatGPT4-generated responses outperformed those from rheumatologists in satisfaction level and empathy, with mean differences of 0.537 (95% CI, 0.252-0.823; P < 0.01) and 0.460 (95% CI, 0.227-0.693; P < 0.01), respectively. From the SLE patients' perspective, ChatGPT4-generated responses were comparable to the rheumatologist-provided answers in all six domains. Subgroup analysis revealed ChatGPT4 responses were more logically consistent and complete regardless of language and exhibited greater comprehensibility, satisfaction and empathy in Chinese. However, ChatGPT4 responses were inferior in comprehensibility for English FAQs. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT4 demonstrated comparable, possibly better in certain domains, to address FAQs from patients with SLE, when compared with the answers provided by specialists. This study showed the potential of applying ChatGPT4 to improve consultation in SLE patients.

Feasibility of Physiotherapist-Led Rheumatology Triage: A Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVE: Given global shortages in the rheumatology workforce, the demand for rheumatology assessment often exceeds the capacity to provide timely access to care. Accurate triage of patient referrals is important to ensure appropriate utilization of finite resources. We assessed the feasibility of physiotherapist (PT)-led triage using a standardized protocol in identifying cases of inflammatory arthritis (IA), as compared to usual rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, in a tertiary care rheumatology clinic. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective, nonblinded, randomized, parallel-group feasibility study with referrals randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either PT-led vs usual rheumatologist triage. Standardized information was collected at referral receipt, triage, and clinic visit. Rheumatologist diagnosis was considered the gold standard for diagnosis of IA. RESULTS: One hundred two referrals were randomized to the PT-led triage arm and 101 to the rheumatologist arm. In the PT-led arm, 65% of referrals triaged as urgent were confirmed to have IA vs 60% in the rheumatologist arm (P = 0.57), suggesting similar accuracy in identifying IA. More referrals were declined in the PT-led triage arm (24 vs 8, P = 0.002), resulting in fewer referrals triaged as semiurgent (6 vs 23, P = 0.003). One case of IA (rheumatologist arm) was incorrectly triaged, resulting in significant delay in time to first assessment. CONCLUSION: PT-led triage was feasible, appeared as reliable as rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, and led to significantly fewer patients requiring in-clinic visits. This has implications for waitlist management and optimal rheumatology resource utilization.