Clinical outcomes in people with diabetes-related foot infections: Analysis from a limb preservation service infection database.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes-related foot infections are common and represent a significant clinical challenge. There are scant data about outcomes from large cohorts. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes from a large cohort of people with diabetes-related foot infections. METHODS: A tertiary referral hospital limb preservation service database was established in 2018, and all new episodes of foot infections were captured prospectively using an electronic database (REDCap). People with foot infections between January 2018 and May 2023, for whom complete data were available on infection episodes, were included. Infection outcomes were compared between skin and soft tissue infections (SST-DFI) and osteomyelitis (OM) using chi-square tests. RESULTS: Data extraction identified 647 complete DFI episodes in 397 patients. The data set was divided into two cohorts identifying each infection episode and its severity as either SST-DFI (N = 326, 50%) or OM (N = 321, 50%). Most infection presentations were classified as being moderate (PEDIS 3 = 327, 51%), with 36% mild (PEDIS 2 = 239) and 13% severe (PEDIS 4 = 81). Infection resolution occurred in 69% (n = 449) of episodes with failure in 31% (n = 198). Infection failures were more common with OM than SST-DFI (OM = 140, 71% vs. SST-DFI = 58, 29%, p < 0.00001). In patients with SST-DFI a greater number of infection failures were observed in the presence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) compared to the patients without PAD (failure occurred in 30% (31/103) of episodes with PAD and 12% (27/223) of episodes without PAD; p < 0.001). In contrast, the number of observed infection failures in OM episodes were similar in patients with and without PAD (failure occurred in 45% (57/128) of episodes with PAD and 55% (83/193) of episodes without PAD; p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important epidemiological data on the risk of poor outcomes for DFI and factors associated with poor outcomes in an Australian setting. It highlights the association of PAD and treatment failure, reinforcing the need for early intervention to improve PAD in patients with DFI. Future randomised trials should assess the benefits of revascularisation and surgery in people with DFI and particularly those with OM where outcomes are worse.

Traumatic lower extremity amputation as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether lower extremity (LE) amputation among civilian casualties is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: All patients with severe LE injuries (AIS ≥3) derived from the ACS-TQIP (2013-2020) were divided into those who underwent trauma-associated amputation and those with limb salvage. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias and confounding and compare the rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: A total of 145,667 patients with severe LE injuries were included, with 3443 patients requiring LE amputation. After successful matching, patients sustaining LE amputation still experienced significantly higher rates of PE (4.2% vs. 2.5%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and DVT (6.5% vs. 3.4%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). A sensitivity analysis examining patients with isolated major LE trauma similarly showed a higher rate of thromboembolic complications, including higher incidences of PE (3.2% vs. 2.0%, p â€‹= â€‹0.015) and DVT (4.7% vs. 2.6%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide analysis, traumatic lower extremity amputation is associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE events, including PE and DVT.

The Effect of Limb Salvage Efforts in Different Age Groups: Relationships Between Major and Minor Amputations.

"Limb salvage" efforts, such as performing minor amputations before infections spread proximally from the foot to decrease major lower extremity amputation, are an important part of healthcare today. It is unclear whether these efforts are preventing the number of major amputations and improving patients' quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the U.S. healthcare system. Rates of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation (NLEA) among patients with diabetes decreased in the early 2000s but rebounded in the 2010s. We analyzed the proportion of major amputations and differences in amputation rates between age groups in Texas. Patient data was extracted from the Texas Hospital Discharge Data Public Use Data File. Population estimates were obtained from the Texas Population Estimates Program from 2011 to 2015 and from intercensal estimates provided by the U.S. Census Bureau from 2006 to 2010. Raw numbers of minor, major, and all NLEA surgeries and the ratio of major amputations to total amputations per year were reported for each age group. Poisson regression and Joinpoint analyses were performed to capture these changes in trends. Rates of amputations increased, with significant decreasing relative prevalence of major amputations. Patients aged 45 to 64 with diabetes are likely driving these increases. Rates of lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetes increased from 2009 to 2015. This holds for all and minor amputations. In contrast, the ratio of major to all amputations decreased from 2010. Utilization of major and minor amputation differs between age groups, remaining stable in the youngest subjects, with minor amputation rates increasing in those aged 45 to 64.

Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors in Acute Lower Limb Ischaemia: A Population Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contemporary population based incidence of acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) and factors associated with major amputation/death at one year. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, in hospital, operation, radiological, and autopsy registries were scrutinised to capture 161 citizens of Malmö, Sweden, with ALI between 2015 and 2018. Age and sex specific incidence rates were calculated in the population of Malmö between 2015 and 2018, expressed as number of patients per 100 000 person years (PY). Independent risk factors for major amputation/death at one year were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients with ALI gave an overall incidence of 12.2/100 000 PY (95% CI 10.3 - 14.1), with no sex related differences. Embolism (42.2%) was the most common cause of ALI. Among 52 patients with atrial fibrillation, 38.5% were on anticoagulant medication. Endovascular or open vascular revascularisation was performed in 54.7% of patients. The total cause specific mortality ratio was 2.63 (95% CI 1.66 - 3.61)/1 000 deaths, without no sex related differences. The combined major amputation/mortality rate at one year for the whole cohort was 46.6%. Rutherford ≥ IIb ALI (OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.94 - 9.02; p < .001), age (OR 1.03/year, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.06; p = .036), female sex (OR 2.37, 95% 1.07 - 5.26; p = .034), and anaemia (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.08 - 5.62; p = .033) were associated with an increased risk of major amputation/death at one year. The major amputation/mortality rate at one year was 100% (n = 14/14) for patients living in a nursing home on admission. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ALI appears to be unchanged, and major amputation and mortality at one year remain high. It is necessary to include the substantial proportion of patients with ALI that do not undergo revascularisation in epidemiological studies. There is room for improvement in anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent ALI due to embolism. Research on gender inequalities in patients with ALI is warranted.

Sex-based differences in loss of independence after lower extremity bypass surgery.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes sex-based differences in the risk of discharge to a nonhome facility (loss of independence) after lower extremity revascularization and resultant outcomes. METHODS: Data from the NSQIP database for years 2015-2017 was utilized to assess sex-based differences in loss of independence and associated unplanned readmission and 30-day amputation using chi-square, student t-test, and multivariate logistic regression analyses where appropriate. RESULTS: There was increased loss of independence in women (34.9% vs. 26.1 %, p < .01) and associated increase in unplanned readmission (18.4% vs. 13.6 %, p = .01) and length of stay (12.1 days vs 6.5 days, p < .01). Endovascular revascularization was associated with decreased likelihood of loss of independence (OR 0.43, CI 0.36-0.50). CONCLUSION: Loss of independence after lower extremity bypass surgery affects women more than men and it is associated with worse postoperative outcomes.

Procedural and 12-month in-hospital costs of primary infra-popliteal bypass surgery, infrapopliteal best endovascular treatment, and major lower limb amputation for chronic limb threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a growing global problem due to the widespread use of tobacco and increasing prevalence of diabetes. Although the financial consequences are considerable, few studies have compared the relative cost-effectiveness of different CLTI management strategies. The Bypass vs Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-2 trial is randomizing patients with CLTI to primary infrapopliteal (IP) vein bypass surgery (BS) or best endovascular treatment (BET) and includes a comprehensive within-trial cost-utility analysis. The aim of this study is to compare over a 12-month time horizon, the costs of primary IP BS, IP best endovascular treatment (BET), and major limb major amputation (MLLA) to inform the BASIL-2 cost-utility analysis. METHODS: We compared procedural human resource (HR) costs and total in-hospital costs for the index admission, and over the following 12-months, in 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary IP BS (n = 20), IP BET (n = 20), or MLLA (10 transfemoral and 10 transtibial) for CLTI within the BASIL prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Procedural HR costs were greatest for BS (BS £2551; 95% confidence interval [CI], £1934-£2807 vs MLLA £1130; 95% CI, £1046-£1297 vs BET £329; 95% CI, £242-£390; P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis) due to longer procedure duration and greater staff requirement. With regard to the index admission, MLLA was the most expensive due to longer hospital stay (MLLA £13,320; 95% CI, £8986-£18,616 vs BS £8714; 95% CI, £6097-£11,973 vs BET £4813; 95% CI, £3529-£6097; P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis). The total cost of the index admission and in-hospital care over the following 12 months remained least for BET (MLLA £26,327; 95% CI, £17,653-£30,458 vs BS £20,401; 95% CI, £12,071-£23,926 vs BET £12,298; 95% CI, £6961-£15,439; P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 12-month time horizon, MLLA and IP BS are more expensive than IP BET in terms of procedural HR costs and total in-hospital costs. These economic data, together with quality of life data from BASIL-2, will inform the calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for different CLTI management strategies within the BASIL-2 cost-utility analysis.

Pedal arterial calcification score is associated with the risk of major amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The medial arterial calcification (MAC) score is a simple metric that describes the burden of inframalleolar calcification using a plain foot radiograph. We hypothesized that a higher MAC score would be independently associated with the risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We performed a single-institution, retrospective study of 250 patients who had undergone infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI from January 2011 to July 2019 and had foot radiographs available for MAC score calculation. A single blinded reviewer assigned MAC scores of 0 to 5 using two-view minimum plain foot radiographs, with 1 point each for calcification of >2 cm in the dorsalis pedis, plantar, and metatarsal arteries and >1 cm in the hallux and non-hallux digital arteries. RESULTS: The MAC score was 0 in 36%, 1 in 5.2%, 2 in 8.4%, 3 in 14%, 4 in 14%, and 5 in 21%. The MAC score was trichotomized to facilitate analysis and clinical utility (mild, MAC score 0-1; moderate, MAC score 2-4; and severe, MAC score 5). The variables independently associated with a higher MAC score were male sex, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and the global limb anatomic staging system pedal score. The MAC score was not associated with the Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) grade or overall WIfI stage (P = .58). The median follow-up was 759 days (interquartile range, 264-1541 days). A higher MAC score was significantly associated with the risk of major amputation (P < .0001). In a Cox proportional hazards multiple regression model for major amputation that included the trichotomized MAC score, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and WIfI stage (1-3 vs 4). The MAC score (MAC score 5: hazard ratio [HR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-13.1; P = .001; MAC score 2-4: HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.8; P = .01) and WIfI stage (WIfI stage 4: HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P = .03) were significantly associated with the risk of major amputation. In the subsets of patients with the most advanced WIfI stage of 3 to 4 (191 of 250; 76%) and patients with diabetes (185 of 250; 74%), the MAC score further stratified the risk of major amputation on univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The MAC score is a simple, practical tool and a strong independent predictor of major amputation in patients with CLTI. It provides novel clinical data that are currently unmeasured using any validated CLTI staging system. The MAC score is a promising standardized measure of inframalleolar disease burden that can be used in conjunction with the WIfI staging system to help improve outcomes stratification and determine the optimal treatment strategies for patients with CLTI.

Participation in a Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Randomized Trial Is Inversely Correlated With Regional Amputation Rate in Limb Threatening Ischemia Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service demonstrated that regions of the United Kingdom with the highest number of patients enrolled in research studies had the lowest risk-adjusted mortality when patients were admitted to the hospital. Our goal was to investigate if this correlation was evident for patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLI) treated in the United States (US). Accordingly, we examined correlations among sites participating in the Best Endovascular versus best Surgical Therapy in patients with Critical (BEST-CLI) trial, a multicenter, National Institute of Health-sponsored, international randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing revascularization strategies in patients with CLI, and regional rates of major amputation from CLI. METHODS: We measured regional participation in the BEST-CLI trial by evaluating trial participation and enrollment rosters. To determine regional rates of lower limb amputation, we queried the Medicare database (2007-2016) for patients with concurrent peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetes, then assessed how many had lower extremity amputations. Correlation of regional amputation rates with distribution of BEST-CLI sites in four US geographical regions was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Simple regression equations were used to calculate the significance of these correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Of 9,231,909 CLI patients, 342,406 underwent amputation in the Medicare dataset. Amputation rates per 1000 CLI patients differed by region (South 40.42, Midwest 40.12, West 34.81, Northeast 31.14). There were 116 US vascular centers, selected by volume and expertise that participated in BEST-CLI with the following distribution: South (n = 30, 26%), Midwest (n = 26, 22%), West (n = 29, 25%), and Northeast (n = 31, 27%). There was a negative correlation between the number of amputations per 1000 for Medicare CLI patients with diabetes and PAD and the number of BEST-CLI sites in the region which trended toward significance (Pearson R= -0.61, P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Amputation rate among Medicare CLI patients is inversely correlated with US BEST-CLI site distribution. Higher participation in clinical research, especially within large RCTs, may be a marker of optimal PAD management.

Risk Factors for Loss to Follow-Up in the Lower Extremity Limb Salvage Population.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage for chronic lower extremity wounds requires long-term care best delivered by specialized multidisciplinary centers. This optimizes function, reduces amputation rates, and improves mortality. These centers may be limited to urban/academic settings, making access and appropriate follow-up challenging. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that both system- and patient-related factors put this population at exceedingly high risk for loss to follow-up. METHODS: Records were reviewed retrospectively for 200 new patients seen at the Georgetown Center for Wound Healing in 2013. The primary outcome was loss to follow-up, defined as three consecutive missed appointments despite explicit documentation indicating the need for return visits. Demographic, clinical, and geographic data were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for loss to follow-up status controlled for variables found significant in the bivariate analysis. Spatial dependency was evaluated using variograms. RESULTS: Over a 6.5-year-period, 49.5 percent of patients followed were lost to follow-up. Male sex and increased driving distance to the limb salvage center were risk factors for loss to follow-up. Wound-specific characteristics including ankle and knee/thigh location were also associated with higher rates of loss to follow-up. There was no spatial dependency or discrete clustering of at-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics that predispose chronic lower extremity wound patients to loss to follow-up. These findings inform stakeholders of the high rates of loss to follow-up and support decentralized specialty care, in the form of telemedicine, satellite facilities, and/or dedicated case managers. Future work will focus on targeting vulnerable populations through focused interventions to reduce patient and system burden. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes following Severe Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction: The Value of an Orthoplastic Limb Salvage Center to Racially Underserved Communities.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that nonwhite race and disadvantaged socioeconomic status negatively impact outcomes following lower extremity reconstruction. The authors sought to characterize differences in outcomes between racial groups in patients necessitating traumatic lower extremity reconstruction at an orthoplastic limb salvage center. METHODS: A retrospective review between 2002 and 2019 was conducted of patients who underwent free flap lower extremity reconstruction at an orthoplastic limb salvage center. Patient demographics were identified, and permanent addresses were used to collect census data. Short-term complications and long-term functional status were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three patients underwent lower extremity reconstruction and met inclusion criteria. Among all three groups, African American patients were more likely to be single (80 percent African American versus 49 percent Caucasian and 29.4 percent other; p < 0.05) and had significantly lower rates of private insurance compared with Caucasian patients (25 percent versus 56.7 percent; p < 0.05). African American patients demonstrated no significant differences in total flap failure (4.9 percent versus 8 percent and 5.6 percent; p = 0.794), reoperations (10 percent versus 5.8 percent and 16.7 percent; p = 0.259), and number of readmissions (2.4 versus 2.0 and 2.1; p = 0.624). Chronic pain management (53.3 percent versus 44.2 percent and 50 percent; p = 0.82), full weight-bearing status (84.2 percent versus 92.7 percent and 100 percent; p = 0.507), and ambulation status (92.7 percent versus 100 percent and 100 percent; p = 0.352) were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are equivalent between racial groups presenting to an orthoplastic limb salvage center for lower extremity reconstruction. The postoperative rehabilitation strategies, follow-up, and overall support that an orthoplastic limb salvage center ensures may lessen the impact of socioeconomic disparities in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Long Term Survival and Limb Salvage in Patients With Non-Revascularisable Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide long term survival and limb salvage rates for patients with non-revascularisable (NR) chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, derived from a randomised controlled trial (JUVENTAS) investigating the use of a regenerative cell therapy. Survival and limb salvage of the index limb in CLTI patients without viable options for revascularisation at inclusion were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was amputation free survival, a composite of survival and limb salvage, at five years after inclusion in the original trial. RESULTS: In 150 patients with NR-CLTI, amputation free survival was 43% five years after inclusion. This outcome was driven by an equal rate of all cause mortality (35%) and amputation (33%). Amputation occurred predominantly in the first year. Furthermore, 33% of those with amputation subsequently died within the investigated period, with a median interval of 291 days. CONCLUSION: Five years after the initial need for revascularisation, about half of the CLTI patients who were deemed non-revascularisable survived with salvage of the index limb. Although the prospects for these high risk patients are still poor, under optimal medical care, amputation free survival seems comparable with that of revascularisable CLTI patients, while the major amputation rate within one year, especially among NR-CLTI patients with ischaemic tissue loss, is very high.

Outcome of Femoral-popliteal Bypass Procedures in Different Ethnic Groups in England: A Retrospective Analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies, mainly from the United States, have reported worse outcomes from lower limb bypass procedures in ethnic minority populations. Limited nationwide data are available from ethnic minority populations from Europe. The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes from lower limb bypass procedures in ethnic minorities from England. METHODS: We enquired the "Hospital Episode Statistics" database, using ICD-10 codes to identify all cases of femoral-popliteal bypass operations from English NHS Hospitals from 01/01/2006 to 31/12/2015. Every case was followed up for 2 years for subsequent events. The primary outcomes were mortality and major leg amputation. Patients were broadly categorised according to Black, Asian and White ethnicity. Chi-square test was used to the ethnic groups and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using White ethnic group with the largest numbers of participants as a reference category. RESULTS: In the examined 10-year period, 20825 femoral-popliteal bypass procedures (250 of Black, 167 of Asian, and 20.408 of White ethnicity) were recorded. Thirty-day and 2-year mortality were 2.8% and 16.8% with no significant ethnic differences. Patients of Black ethnicity had higher risk of limb loss compared to Whites (23.2% vs. 15.6%, OR = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.19, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in amputation rates between Asians and Whites (16.2% vs.. 15.6%, P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients of Black ethnicity are at higher risk of limb loss after a femoropopliteal bypass procedure. Further research is needed to identify the causes of this discrepancy.

Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Mid/Hindfoot Trauma: Comparison of Limb Salvage and Transtibial Amputation (OUTLET).

BACKGROUND: Selecting the best treatment for patients with severe terminal lower-limb injury remains a challenge. For some injuries, amputation may result in better outcomes than limb salvage. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent limb salvage with those that would have been achieved had they undergone amputation. METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational study included patients 18 to 60 years of age in whom a Type-III pilon or IIIB or C ankle fracture, a Type-III talar or calcaneal fracture, or an open or closed blast/crush foot injury had been treated with limb salvage (n = 488) or amputation (n = 151) and followed for 18 months. The primary outcome was the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Causal effect estimates of the improvement that amputation would have provided if it had been performed instead of limb salvage were calculated for the SMFA score, physical performance, pain, participation in vigorous activities, and return to work. RESULTS: The patients who underwent limb salvage would have had small differences in most outcomes had they undergone amputation. The most notable difference was an improvement in the SMFA mobility score of 7 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0 to 10.7). Improvements were largest for pilon/ankle fractures and complex injury patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Amputation should be considered a treatment option rather than a last resort for the most complex terminal lower-limb injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lower extremity arterial interventions in England.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus and advances in endovascular therapies continue to have an impact on the epidemiology and management of lower extremity arterial disease. This study describes trends in lower extremity revascularisation and major lower limb amputation in NHS England over the past two decades (2000-2019). METHODS: Numbers of lower extremity endovascular interventions, open surgical procedures and major lower limb amputations performed in NHS England between 2000 and 2019 were extracted from publicly available hospital admitted patient care activity reports. Trends in intervention were assessed with linear regression models and chi-square tests for trend. RESULTS: Over this period, 527,131 revascularisations and 92,053 amputations were performed. The mean age of patients was 67.5 years (standard deviation 1.6 years) and 65.3% were male. The number of lower limb revascularisation procedures increased by 402.4 units/year (95% confidence interval, CI, 290.1-514.6, p < 0.001). The number of endovascular interventions rose by 43.5% (10,912 in 2000 vs 15,657 in 2019; ß = 359.5.0, 95% CI 279.3-439.8, p < 0.001) compared with no significant increase in the number of open surgical procedures (8,483 in 2000 vs 7,872 in 2019; ß = 42.8, 95% CI -8.3 to 94.0, p = 0.095). The number of major lower limb amputations has decreased by 9.4% (5,418 in 2000 vs 4,907 in 2019; ß = -31.0; 95% CI -49.6 to -12.5, R2 = 0.42, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant increase in the rate of lower limb revascularisation procedures associated with decreased numbers of major lower limb amputations over the past two decades. These changes in overall trends may affect both service provision and vascular surgery training planning.

Resection of Anterior and Lateral Muscle Compartments Does Not Preclude Limb Salvage and Functions.

BACKGROUND: Fasciotomy with resection of nonviable muscle is often necessary when there is a delay in compartment syndrome (CS) diagnosis after revascularization. The reported rate of major amputation following missed CS or delayed fasciotomy ranges from 12% to 35%. Herein, the authors present a series of critically ill patients who experienced delayed CS diagnosis and required complete resection of the anterior and/or lateral compartments but still achieved limb salvage and function. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified five patients from April 2018 to April 2019 within a single institution who met the inclusion criteria. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, risk factors, time to diagnosis following revascularization, muscle compartments resected, operative and wound care details, and functional outcome at follow-up. RESULTS: All of the patients developed CS of the lower extremity following revascularization secondary to acute limb ischemia and required two-incision, four-compartment fasciotomies. Further, they all required serial operative debridements to achieve limb salvage; however, there were no major amputations, and all of the patients were walking at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Delay in CS diagnosis can have devastating consequences, resulting in major amputation. In cases where myonecrosis is isolated to two or fewer compartments, complete compartment muscle resection can be safely performed, and limb preservation and function can be maintained with aggressive wound management and physical therapy.

A Leg to Stand on: Trauma Center Designation and Association with Rate of Limb Salvage in Patients Suffering Severe Lower Extremity Injury.

BACKGROUND: Mangled extremities are one of the most difficult injuries for trauma surgeons to manage. We compare limb salvage rates for a limb-threatening lower extremity injuries managed at Level I vs Level II trauma centers (TCs). STUDY DESIGN: We identified all adult patients with a limb-threatening injury who underwent primary amputation or limb salvage (LS) using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program database at ACS Level I vs II TCs between 2007 and 2017. A limb-threatening injury was defined as an open tibial fracture with concurrent arterial injury (Gustilo type IIIc). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to minimize confounding by indication. RESULTS: There were 712 records for analysis; 391 (54.9%) LS performed and 321 (45.1%) underwent amputation. The rate of LS was statistically higher among patients treated at Level I TCs vs those treated at Level II TCs (47.4% vs 34.8%; p = 0.01). Patients with penetrating injuries (13% vs 9.5%; p = 0.046) and tibial/peroneal artery injury (72.9% vs 50.4%; p < 0.001), as opposed to popliteal artery injury (30.8% vs 58.8%; p < 0.001), were more likely to have LS. The risk-adjusted odds of LS was 3.13 times higher at Level I TCs vs Level II TCs (95% CI, 1.59 to 6.34; p = 0.001). Limb salvage rates were significantly higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs (53.0% vs 34.8%; p = 0.004), even after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a mangled extremity, limb salvage rates are 50% higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs, independent of case mix and injury severity.

Results After Open and Endovascular Repair of Popliteal Aneurysm: A Matched Comparison Within a Population Based Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors affecting the outcome after open surgical (OSR) and endovascular (ER) repair of popliteal artery aneurysm (PA) in comparable cohorts. METHODS: A matched comparison in a national, population based cohort of 592 legs treated for PA (2008 - 2012), with long term follow up. Registry data from 899 PA patients treated in 2014 - 2018 were analysed for time trends. The 77 legs treated by ER were matched, by indication, with 154 legs treated with OSR. Medical records and imaging were collected. Analysed risk factors were anatomy, comorbidities, and medication. Elongation and angulations were examined in a core lab. The main outcome was occlusion. RESULTS: Patients in the ER group were older (73 vs. 68 years, p = .001), had more lung disease (p = .012), and were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulants more often (p < .001). The hazard ratio (HR with 95% confidence intervals) for occlusion was 2.69 (1.60 - 4.55, p < .001) for ER, but 3.03 (1.26 - 7.27, p = .013) for poor outflow. For permanent occlusion, the HR after ER was 2.47 (1.35 - 4.50, p = .003), but 4.68 (1.89 - 11.62, p < .001) for poor outflow. In the ER subgroup, occlusion was more common after acute ischaemia (HR 2.94 [1.45 - 5.97], p = .003; and poor outflow HR 14.39 [3.46 - 59.92], p < .001). Larger stent graft diameter reduced the risk (HR 0.71 [0.54 - 0.93], p = .014). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for indication and stent graft diameter, elongation increased the risk (HR 1.020 per degree [1.002 - 1.033], p = .030). PAs treated for acute ischaemia had a median stent graft diameter of 6.5 mm, with those for elective procedures being 8 mm (p < .001). Indications and outcomes were similar during both time periods (2008 - 2012 and 2014 - 2018). CONCLUSION: In comparable groups, ER had a 2.7 fold increased risk of any occlusion, and 2.4 fold increased risk of permanent occlusion, despite more aggressive medical therapy. Risk factors associated with occlusion in ER were poor outflow, smaller stent graft diameter, acute ischaemia, and angulation/elongation. An association between indication, acute ischaemia, and small stent graft diameter was identified.

Role of Bypass with Preoperatively Diagnosed Small Caliber Veins in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: In chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), although recent studies suggested that limbs classified as a higher Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) stage would benefit more from bypass surgery than endovascular therapy (EVT), graft unavailability is a major limitation for bypass. However, such graft unavailability is not clearly defined. This study aimed to assess whether bypass with veins judged as small by preoperative ultrasound is acceptable to achieve wound healing. METHODS: Ninety-five limbs classified as WIfI stage 3/4 that underwent infrainguinal bypass with veins were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the preoperative inner diameter of veins. Those with a diameter <2.5 mm were classified as small caliber grafts (SMGs, n=28) and those with a diameter ≥2.5 mm as sufficient caliber grafts (SUGs, n=67), and wound-related outcomes were evaluated. Wound healing rate (WHR) was analyzed in all cohort, and wound recurrence-free rate (WRF) and wound recurrence-free amputation-free survival rate (WRAFS) were calculated for limbs that achieved wound healing. A propensity score matched analysis was also performed to minimize the background difference, and 21 matched pairs were included for the analysis. RESULTS: Although the primary patency rate was significantly worse in SMGs (1-year patency, Crude model: 82.1% in SUGs and 51.0% in SMGs, P=0.0003; matched model: 77.7% in SUGs and 41.6% in SMGs, P = 0.005), the secondary patency rate was maintained in the equivalent level (1-year patency, Crude model: 81.8% in SUGs and 83.1% in SMGs, P=0.26; matched model: 77.7% in SUGs and 78.4% in SMGs, P = 0.24). One-year WHR was equivalent between the groups in both crude and matched models (Crude model: 87.0% in SUGs and 83.8% in SMGs, P=0.13; matched model: 66.3% in SUGs and 61.4% in SMGs, P = 0.65). One-year WRF and WRAFS were also equivalent (Crude model: WRF, 95.9% in SUGs and 100% in SMGs, P = 0.71; WRAFS, 87.2% in SUGs and 88.0% in SMGs, P = 0.78. Matched model: WRF, 100% in SUGs and 100% in SMGs, P = 0.85; WRAFS, 92.9% in SUGs and 78.6% in SMGs, P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Although bypass with small caliber veins showed an inferior primary patency rate, WHR and WRF were equally good if grafts are maintained patent. Bypass with small caliber vein grafts would be an important option to achieve wound healing.

Amputation versus Free Flap: Long-Term Outcomes of Microsurgical Limb Salvage and Risk Factors for Amputation in the Diabetic Population.

BACKGROUND: Reconstructive microsurgery is an effective limb-saving option for nonhealing lower extremity wounds in diabetic patients. However, the ability to predict the future need for amputation is unclear. This article seeks to identify risk factors for amputation following microsurgical free tissue transfer in the diabetic lower extremity. METHODS: Diabetic patients undergoing lower extremity free flap surgery between August of 2011 and January of 2018 performed by a single surgeon were identified retrospectively. Patient comorbidities, reconstructive conditions and flap traits, microsurgical outcomes, and long-term outcomes were examined. Variables conferring risk for future amputation were examined by means of regression analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients met the criteria. The overall immediate flap success rate was 94 percent (60 of 64). Long term, 50 patients (78.1 percent) underwent successful salvage, and 14 patients (21.9 percent) required major amputation. Acute flap loss resulted in four amputations, and delayed complications (hematoma, infection, recurrent nonhealing) resulted in 10 amputations. The average time to amputation was 5.6 months. Risk factors for amputation were end-stage renal disease (OR, 30.7; p = 0.0087), hindfoot wounds (OR, 4.6; p = 0.020), elevated hemoglobin A1C level greater than 8.4 percent (OR, 1.4; p = 0.05), and positive wound cultures (OR, 6.1; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple comorbidities and poor glucose control were identified as risk factors for amputation after free flap limb salvage. However, successful limb preservation is possible. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Changing Paradigms in Below-the-Knee Arterial Interventions: Are We Saving Legs?

BACKGROUND: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) involving the below-the-knee (BTK) arteries are at increased risk of limb loss. Despite improvement in endovascular modalities, it is still unclear whether an aggressive approach results in improved limb salvage. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether an aggressive approach to BTK arterial disease results in improved limb salvage. METHODS: A comparative study of two groups was conducted. Group 1 included patients treated between 2012 and 2014, primarily with transfemoral angioplasty of the tibial arteries. Group 2 included patients treated between 2015-2019 with a wide array of endovascular modalities (stents, multiple tibial artery and pedal angioplasty, retrograde access). Primary endpoint was freedom from amputation at 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 529 BTK interventions were performed. Mean age was 71 ± 10.6 years, 382 (79%) were male. Patients in group 1 were less likely to be taking clopidogrel (66% vs. 83%, P < 0.01) and statins (72 % vs. 87%, P < 0.01). Several therapeutic modalities were used more often in group 2 than in group 1, including pedal angioplasty (24 vs. 43 %, P = 0.01), tibial and pedal retrograde access (0 vs. 10%, P = 0.01), and tibial stenting (3% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Revascularization of two or more tibial arteries was performed at a higher rate in group 2 (54% vs. 50%, P = 0.45). Estimated freedom from amputation at 40 months follow-up was higher in group 2 (53% vs. 63%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive, multimodality approach in treating BTK arteries results in improved limb salvage.