Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 7.567
Filtrer
1.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241256822, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842194

RÉSUMÉ

Behavioral health crisis care (BHCC) is a care delivery model for individuals experiencing acute distress related to a mental health or substance use disorder. We examined market factors associated with comprehensive BHCC availability using 2022 data on mental health treatment facilities (n = 9385) obtained from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. We aggregated facility-level data by county (n = 3142) and merged with county-level market factors. Logistic regression models were used to examine the adjusted associations between market factors and BHCC availability. We found that 468 (14.9%) counties had at least one mental health treatment facility offering comprehensive BHCC services. Specifically, counties with more mental health providers (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 2.26, Confidence Interval = 1.32-3.86) and metropolitan counties (AOR = 3.26, CI = 1.95-5.43) had higher odds of having a comprehensive BHCC facility. Our findings highlight the importance of developing the mental health workforce to increase BHCC availability and a need to address disparities in rural counties.


Sujet(s)
Accessibilité des services de santé , Troubles mentaux , Services de santé mentale , Humains , États-Unis , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Accessibilité des services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles liés à une substance/épidémiologie , Intervention de crise/statistiques et données numériques , Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (USA)
2.
Harm Reduct J ; 21(1): 108, 2024 Jun 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824597

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Syringe services programs (SSPs) are critical healthcare access points for people with opioid use disorder (OUD) who face treatment utilization barriers. Co-locating care for common psychiatric comorbidities, like posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), at SSPs may reduce harms and enhance the health of individuals with OUD. To guide the development of onsite psychiatric care at SSPs, we collected quantitative survey data on the prevalence of PTSD, drug use patterns, treatment experiences associated with a probable PTSD diagnosis, and attitudes regarding onsite PTSD care in a convenience sample of registered SSP clients in New York City. METHODS: Study participants were administered the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) and asked about sociodemographic characteristics, current drug use, OUD and PTSD treatment histories, and desire for future SSP services using a structured interview. Probable PTSD diagnosis was defined as a PCL-5 score ≥ 31. RESULTS: Of the 139 participants surveyed, 138 experienced at least one potentially traumatic event and were included in the present analysis. The sample was primarily male (n = 108, 78.3%), of Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity (n = 76, 55.1%), and middle-aged (M = 45.0 years, SD = 10.6). The mean PCL-5 score was 35.2 (SD = 21.0) and 79 participants (57.2%) had a probable PTSD diagnosis. We documented frequent SSP utilization, significant unmet PTSD treatment need, and high interest in onsite PTSD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings point to the ubiquity of PTSD in people with OUD who visit SSPs, large gaps in PTSD care, and the potential for harm reduction settings like SSPs to reach people underserved by the healthcare system who have co-occurring OUD and PTSD.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé mentale , Programme d'échange de seringues , Troubles de stress post-traumatique , Humains , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/épidémiologie , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/thérapie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Programme d'échange de seringues/statistiques et données numériques , New York (ville)/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Troubles liés aux opiacés/épidémiologie , Toxicomanie intraveineuse/épidémiologie , Préférence des patients , Besoins et demandes de services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Prévalence , Accessibilité des services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques
3.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0303079, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833458

RÉSUMÉ

How did mental healthcare utilization change during the COVID-19 pandemic period among individuals with pre-existing mental disorder? Understanding utilization patterns of these at-risk individuals and identifying those most likely to exhibit increased utilization could improve patient stratification and efficient delivery of mental health services. This study leveraged large-scale electronic health record (EHR) data to describe mental healthcare utilization patterns among individuals with pre-existing mental disorder before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify correlates of high mental healthcare utilization. Using EHR data from a large healthcare system in Massachusetts, we identified three "pre-existing mental disorder" groups (PMD) based on having a documented mental disorder diagnosis within the 6 months prior to the March 2020 lockdown, related to: (1) stress-related disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety) (N = 115,849), (2) serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorders) (N = 11,530), or (3) compulsive behavior disorders (e.g., eating disorder, OCD) (N = 5,893). We also identified a "historical comparison" group (HC) for each PMD (N = 113,604, 11,758, and 5,387, respectively) from the previous year (2019). We assessed the monthly number of mental healthcare visits from March 13 to December 31 for PMDs in 2020 and HCs in 2019. Phenome-wide association analyses (PheWAS) were used to identify clinical correlates of high mental healthcare utilization. We found the overall number of mental healthcare visits per patient during the pandemic period in 2020 was 10-12% higher than in 2019. The majority of increased visits was driven by a subset of high mental healthcare utilizers (top decile). PheWAS results indicated that correlates of high utilization (prior mental disorders, chronic pain, insomnia, viral hepatitis C, etc.) were largely similar before and during the pandemic, though several conditions (e.g., back pain) were associated with high utilization only during the pandemic. Limitations included that we were not able to examine other risk factors previously shown to influence mental health during the pandemic (e.g., social support, discrimination) due to lack of social determinants of health information in EHR data. Mental healthcare utilization among patients with pre-existing mental disorder increased overall during the pandemic, likely due to expanded access to telemedicine. Given that clinical correlates of high mental healthcare utilization in a major hospital system were largely similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, resource stratification based on known risk factor profiles may aid hospitals in responding to heightened mental healthcare needs during a pandemic.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Troubles mentaux , Services de santé mentale , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Humains , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/psychologie , Mâle , Femelle , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Pandémies , Dossiers médicaux électroniques , Sujet âgé , SARS-CoV-2 , Massachusetts/épidémiologie , Jeune adulte , Adolescent
4.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 37(4): e13266, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863266

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is commonly associated with intellectual disability, but also with a specific behavioural phenotype and a high predisposition to psychiatric comorbidity. This study examines the psychiatric care situation of people with PWS. METHOD: A structured online questionnaire was administered to carers of people with PWS living in Germany, asking about demographic, diagnostic and treatment parameters as well as personal experiences. RESULTS: Of 77 people with PWS, 44.2% had at least one psychiatric comorbid diagnosis. The main reasons for seeking psychiatric care were emotional outbursts and aggressive behaviour. 34.9% reported that they were currently seeking psychiatric care without success. However, 32.5% of PWS had been treated with psychotropic medication, mainly antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric comorbidity appears to be undertreated in PWS, especially in the ambulatory setting. Uncertainty among mental health care providers may also lead to frequent off-label use of psychotropic medications.


Sujet(s)
Comorbidité , Troubles mentaux , Syndrome de Prader-Willi , Humains , Syndrome de Prader-Willi/traitement médicamenteux , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Jeune adulte , Allemagne/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Psychoanaleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Acceptation des soins par les patients
5.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 457, 2024 Jun 18.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890697

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Adjustment and stress-related disorders are prevalent among psychiatric service users. Despite their prevalence, little is known about their prognosis. To reduce that gap, the present article documents the service use and diagnostic outcomes of people with adjustment or stress-related disorders presenting at Singapore's largest psychiatric emergency department. METHODS: Administrative data from 2014 to 2021 was retrieved to follow a group of 683 service users whose first-ever psychiatric presentation in 2014 warranted a diagnosis of adjustment or stress-related disorder. People were grouped a priori depending on whether different diagnoses were recorded within 7 days, 9 months, after 9 months or not at all. Survival curves characterized conversion to other diagnoses and engagement with healthcare services. Service use outcomes include the number of hospitalizations, outpatient appointments, emergency department visits, and prescriptions. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent (n = 417) never received another diagnosis over the 8-year period. This group used emergency services most and received the most pharmacotherapy shortly after their first visit. Of those who received another diagnosis, depression, personality disorders, and psychotic disorders were the most common. Those who received another diagnosis within 7 days (n = 70, 10%) received it on their first day of hospitalization (IQR 1-1), making the most use of inpatient services. The group who received another diagnosis within 9 months (n = 105, 15%) did so after 42 days (IQR 26-84) and had the highest relative number of deaths. Those who received another diagnosis after 9 months (n = 91, 13%) did so after 1,134 days (IQR 613-1,823) and had the longest period of engagement but made the least use of any psychiatric service, potentially suggesting a group whose early index diagnosis heralded vulnerability to future disorders. CONCLUSIONS: A large group of service users with acute stress or adjustment disorders will likely never be given another psychiatric diagnosis and appear to disengage following an initial period of high-intensity service use. The group that received a different diagnosis after the 9-month mark had prolonged contact with services but low intensity of service use and may represent a target for preventative intervention to help them improve their stress-managing skills and avoid developing other disorders.


Sujet(s)
Troubles de l'adaptation , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Troubles de l'adaptation/épidémiologie , Troubles de l'adaptation/diagnostic , Troubles de l'adaptation/psychologie , Singapour/épidémiologie , Études longitudinales , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériques , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Services des urgences psychiatriques/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques
6.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 45(3): e195-e202, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896565

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Monolingual Spanish speakers-many of whom identify as Hispanic/Latine-often experience barriers to accessing psychology services, including language access. Integrated primary care (IPC) clinics, where individuals receive psychological services within primary care, aim to improve service accessibility. However, minoritized populations are less likely to engage with these services than non-Hispanic/Latine White individuals. Few studies examine psychology treatment engagement within pediatric integrated clinics for Spanish-speaking families. This study investigated differences in psychology treatment engagement for Spanish-speaking families and the role of patient-provider language concordance within pediatric IPC. METHODS: A retrospective chart review examined data from a multiethnic sample of 887 patients (M age = 8.97 yrs, 55.69% male, 64.83% Hispanic/Latine, 6.99% non-Hispanic/Latine White, 41.71% Spanish-preferring) from an urban pediatric IPC clinic serving a high proportion of Hispanic/Latine, Spanish-speaking families. We examined the association between language preference and patient-provider language concordance on service engagement using hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS: Spanish-preferring families were more likely than English-preferring families to engage in psychology services. Working with a Spanish-speaking provider during an initial psychology visit was unrelated to psychology treatment engagement for Spanish-preferring families. CONCLUSION: Higher engagement for Spanish-preferring families seems to reflect the clinic's reputation as a center for linguistically accessible services. While linguistic accessibility remains important, our study did not detect an effect of language concordance during the initial psychology visit and subsequent treatment engagement. The findings highlight the importance of providing culturally responsive and linguistically accessible mental health services for Spanish-speaking families.


Sujet(s)
Hispanique ou Latino , Multilinguisme , Humains , Mâle , Hispanique ou Latino/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Enfant , Études rétrospectives , Soins de santé primaires/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé , Acceptation des soins par les patients/ethnologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Accessibilité des services de santé , Barrières de communication , Langage , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/ethnologie
7.
Am J Occup Ther ; 78(4)2024 Jul 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861552

RÉSUMÉ

IMPORTANCE: Veterans receiving inpatient psychiatric services with limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) benefit from occupational therapy, yet disparities in access are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ADL limitations, an indicator of occupational therapy need, was associated with inpatient psychiatric occupational therapy utilization in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and whether this relationship differs by facility characteristics. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of VHA data. Modified Poisson regression modeled occupational therapy utilization as a function of ADL limitations, facility characteristics, and covariates. Interactions estimated whether the relationship between ADL limitations and occupational therapy utilization differed across facility characteristics. SETTING: VHA inpatient psychiatric setting. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans receiving VHA inpatient psychiatric care from 2015 to 2020 (N = 133,844). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Occupational therapy utilization. RESULTS: Veterans with ADL limitations were more likely to receive occupational therapy. Veterans receiving care in facilities with higher complexity and greater inpatient psychiatric care quality were more likely to receive occupational therapy. Additionally, Black veterans were less likely to receive occupational therapy relative to their White, non-Hispanic counterparts. Interactions indicated that the extent to which ADL limitations drove access to occupational therapy utilization was weaker within facilities with higher complexity and care quality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Veterans with ADL limitations were more likely to access inpatient psychiatric occupational therapy, suggesting that such services are generally allocated to veterans in need. However, findings indicate disparities in access across patient-level (e.g., Black race) and facility-level (e.g., facility complexity) factors, informing efforts to eliminate barriers to accessing these valuable services. Plain-Language Summary: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine disparities in access to inpatient psychiatric occupational therapy in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The study findings show that access to inpatient psychiatric occupational therapy is partly driven by the needs of the patient. However, nonclinical factors, such as a patient's race and the characteristics of the facility at which they receive care (complexity, number of psychiatric beds available, and the quality of psychiatric care), are also important drivers of access. Identifying factors influencing access to these valuable services is the first step in developing strategies that reduce barriers to access for veterans in need.


Sujet(s)
Activités de la vie quotidienne , Accessibilité des services de santé , Disparités d'accès aux soins , Ergothérapie , Department of Veterans Affairs (USA) , Humains , États-Unis , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Anciens combattants , Patients hospitalisés , Troubles mentaux/rééducation et réadaptation , Sujet âgé , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques
8.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 12: e48298, 2024 Jun 24.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913405

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Digital mental health services are increasingly being provided by employers as health benefit programs that can improve access to and remove barriers to mental health care. Stratified care models, in particular, offer personalized care recommendations that can offer clinically effective interventions while conserving resources. Nonetheless, clinical evaluation is needed to understand their benefits for mental health and their use in a real-world setting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the changes in clinical outcomes (ie, depressive and anxiety symptoms and well-being) and to evaluate the use of stratified blended care among members of an employer-sponsored digital mental health benefit. METHODS: In a large prospective observational study, we examined the changes in depressive symptoms (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety symptoms (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale), and well-being (5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index) for 3 months in 509 participants (mean age 33.9, SD 8.7 years; women: n=312, 61.3%; men: n=175, 34.4%; nonbinary: n=22, 4.3%) who were newly enrolled and engaged in care with an employer-sponsored digital mental health platform (Modern Health Inc). We also investigated the extent to which participants followed the recommendations provided to them through a stratified blended care model. RESULTS: Participants with elevated baseline symptoms of depression and anxiety exhibited significant symptom improvements, with a 37% score improvement in depression and a 29% score improvement in anxiety (P values <.001). Participants with baseline scores indicative of poorer well-being also improved over the study period (90% score improvement; P=.002). Furthermore, over half exhibited clinical improvement or recovery for depressive symptoms (n=122, 65.2%), anxiety symptoms (n=127, 59.1%), and low well-being (n=82, 64.6%). Among participants with mild or no baseline symptoms, we found high rates of maintenance for low depressive (n=297, 92.2%) and anxiety (n=255, 86.7%) symptoms and high well-being (n=344, 90.1%). In total, two-thirds of the participants (n=343, 67.4%) used their recommended care, 16.9% (n=86) intensified their care beyond their initial recommendation, and 15.7% (n=80) of participants underused care by not engaging with the highest level of care recommended to them. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with elevated baseline depressive or anxiety symptoms improved their mental health significantly from baseline to follow-up, and most participants without symptoms or with mild symptoms at baseline maintained their mental health over time. In addition, engagement patterns indicate that the stratified blended care model was efficient in matching individuals with the most effective and least costly care while also allowing them to self-determine their care and use combinations of services that best fit their needs. Overall, the results of this study support the clinical effectiveness of the platform for improving and preserving mental health and support the utility and effectiveness of stratified blended care models to improve access to and use of digitally delivered mental health services.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé mentale , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte , Études prospectives , Études longitudinales , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé mentale/normes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Dépression/thérapie , Dépression/psychologie , Télémédecine/statistiques et données numériques
9.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol ; 74(6): 224-231, 2024 Jun.
Article de Allemand | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865998

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to report evidence on mental health needs and access to mental health and psychosocial support for Leipzig citizens of Afghan and Iraqi citizenship in the presence of mental stress and, above all, to identify barriers to access to care. METHODS: All adults in Leipzig with Iraqi or Afghan citizenship, who were not born in Germany were contacted. Various instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, SSS-8, PCL-5/LEC-5) to screen for symptoms of depression, anxiety, somatization disorder or PTSD and one item for self-reported emotional problems were used. Questions on health care utilization and barriers to care followed. RESULTS: 51.4% screened positive in at least one of the tests and self-reported emotional problems. 38.2% of those in need of treatment did not seek help. Frequent reasons for not seeking help were, that the people wanted to solve the problem on their own or that the problem did not bother them very much. A lack of trust and understanding regarding the healthcare system and fear of discrimination and stigmatisation were also perceived as additional barriers to care. DISCUSSION: The study revealed a high percentage of mental health needs. This could be due to the high number of traumatic events and post-migration stressors. A longer period of residence in Germany and easier access to the public health system through the health insurance card could have encouraged the health care utilization. The treatment gap was caused by barriers to care such as a lack of knowledge or trust of the German health care system and fear of stigmatisation and discrimination. CONCLUSION: More information about access to care structures and more low-threshold services need to be implemented. These should be organised on an interdisciplinary basis and focus on culturally and racially sensitive care. Mental health awareness should be strengthened and under no circumstances should the access to care be restricted any further.


Sujet(s)
Accessibilité des services de santé , Services de santé mentale , Stress psychologique , Humains , Adulte , Mâle , Femelle , Allemagne , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Stress psychologique/psychologie , Stress psychologique/thérapie , Jeune adulte , Afghanistan , Iraq , Adolescent , Acceptation des soins par les patients/psychologie , Sujet âgé
10.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1369306, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873302

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction: Health systems including mental health (MH) systems are resilient if they protect human life and produce better health outcomes for all during disease outbreaks or epidemics like Ebola disease and their aftermaths. We explored the resilience of MH services amidst Ebola disease outbreaks in Africa; specifically, to (i) describe the pre-, during-, and post-Ebola disease outbreak MH systems in African countries that have experienced Ebola disease outbreaks, (ii) determine the prevalence of three high burden MH disorders and how those prevalences interact with Ebola disease outbreaks, and, (iii) describe the resilience of MH systems in the context of these outbreaks. Methods: This was a scoping review employing an adapted PRISMA statement. We conducted a five-step Boolean strategy with both free text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to search 9 electronic databases and also searched WHO MINDbank and MH Atlas. Results: The literature search yielded 1,230 publications. Twenty-five studies were included involving 13,449 participants. By 2023, 13 African nations had encountered a total of 35 Ebola outbreak events. None of these countries had a metric recorded in MH Atlas to assess the inclusion of MH in emergency plans. The three highest-burden outbreak-associated MH disorders under the MH and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) framework were depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety with prevalence ranges of 1.4-7%, 2-90%, and 1.3-88%, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis revealed a concerning lack of resilience within the MH systems, as evidenced by the absence of pre-existing metrics to gauge MH preparedness in emergency plans. Additionally, none of the studies evaluated the resilience of MH services for individuals with pre-existing needs or examined potential post-outbreak degradation in core MH services. Discussion: Our findings revealed an insufficiency of resilience, with no evaluation of services for individuals with pre-existing needs or post-outbreak degradation in core MH services. Strengthening MH resilience guided by evidence-based frameworks must be a priority to mitigate the long-term impacts of epidemics on mental well-being.


Sujet(s)
Épidémies de maladies , Fièvre hémorragique à virus Ebola , Services de santé mentale , Humains , Afrique/épidémiologie , Fièvre hémorragique à virus Ebola/épidémiologie , Fièvre hémorragique à virus Ebola/psychologie , Services de santé mentale/organisation et administration , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/épidémiologie , Troubles de stress post-traumatique/psychologie
11.
Healthc Q ; 27(1): 6-9, 2024 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881477

RÉSUMÉ

Sex and gender may play a role in the association between occupational experiences and the mental health (MH) of defence and public safety personnel. This report summarizes the findings of three studies exploring sex-based differences in MH service use between Veterans and non-Veterans in Ontario. Female Veterans had significantly higher rates of MH-related physician visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations compared to female non-Veterans. These findings impart useful information for individuals or organizations with the ability to influence healthcare policy, planning and delivery for the Canadian defence and public safety sectors.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé mentale , Anciens combattants , Humains , Ontario , Femelle , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Anciens combattants/psychologie , Anciens combattants/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Facteurs sexuels , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériques
12.
J Dual Diagn ; 20(3): 251-265, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704859

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify groups of young adults with distinct longitudinal patterns of use of treatment for substance use disorders and mental health (MH) problems and to investigate potential explanatory factors for different patterns of treatment use over time, including sociodemographic factors. METHODS: The sample consisted of 447 young adults aged 16-29 years who entered long-term residential substance use disorder treatment facilities in Norway from 2011 to 2016. In this study, we obtained data collected by the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. These data were linked with the electronic health record data of the substance use disorder treatment facilities from which the participants were recruited. Growth mixture modeling was performed. The identified groups were further compared using analysis of variance or χ2 test. RESULTS: Four groups of participants for total treatment use, substance use disorder treatment use, and MH treatment use were identified. Most participants from the overall sample were classified as members of a group characterized by a low and stable pattern of treatment use over time. A group with a high and stable pattern of treatment use was identified in total and MH treatment use. The proportion of participants with higher levels of substance use disorder treatment use at the end of the study period than at the beginning was larger (35%) than in the case of MH treatment use (14.2%). Younger age was associated with a decreasing pattern of MH treatment use and with an increasing pattern of substance use disorder treatment use over time. There were larger proportions of female participants in groups with a stable high use of MH treatment and in groups with an initially increasing trend of substance use disorder treatment use. Findings revealed that most participants across the identified groups were recipients of welfare benefits, had low educational attainment, and were not working. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated significant variation in trajectories of treatment use among young adults with substance use disorder. Differences in treatment use could indicate differences in symptom severity and complexity. In this study, treatment use was associated with socioeconomic factors, sex, and age. Integrative approaches, including interagency and interdisciplinary collaboration, will often be necessary to sufficiently address the multidimensionality of substance use disorder.


Sujet(s)
Troubles mentaux , Services de santé mentale , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Troubles liés à une substance , Humains , Troubles liés à une substance/thérapie , Troubles liés à une substance/épidémiologie , Mâle , Jeune adulte , Femelle , Adulte , Adolescent , Norvège/épidémiologie , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Études de cohortes , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Diagnostic mixte (psychiatrie) , Études longitudinales
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2413884, 2024 May 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814641

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Although new parents' mental health is known to decline, less is known about changes in therapy attendance, especially among military service members. Objective: To investigate changes in therapy attendance among new parents and by parental leave length. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of US Army and Navy service members from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019, compared parents' monthly therapy attendance with matched nonparents' across childbirth and compared mothers' weekly therapy attendance before vs after returning to work. Eligible monthly sample members included service members with first births from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017, and 12 months of data before to 24 months after birth and nonparents with 36 months of data. Eligible weekly sample members included mothers with first births from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2019, and data from 12 months before to 6 months after birth and nonparents with 18 months of data. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2023, to January 15, 2024. Exposure: Those exposed to parenthood had no prior children, acquired a dependent younger than 1 year, and, for mothers, had an inpatient birth. Unexposed matches did not add a dependent younger than 1 year. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly counts of mental health therapy sessions and any therapy sessions (weekly). Results: The monthly sample included 15 554 193 person-month observations, representing 321 200 parents and matches, including 10 193 mothers (3.2%; mean [SD] age, 25.0 [4.9] years), 50 865 nonmother matches (15.8%; mean [SD] age, 25.0 [5.0] years), 43 365 fathers (13.5%; mean [SD] age, 26.4 [4.8] years), and 216 777 nonfather matches (67.5%; mean [SD] age, 26.4 [4.8] years). The weekly sample included 17 464 mothers. Mothers went to 0.0712 fewer sessions at 1 month post partum (95% CI, -0.0846 to -0.0579) compared with 10 months before birth. Fathers went to 0.0154 fewer sessions in the month of birth (95% CI, -0.0194 to -0.0114) compared with 10 months before. Parents with preexisting treatment needs had larger decreases in treatment. Weekly therapy attendance increased by 0.555 percentage points (95% CI, 0.257-0.852) when mothers returned to work from 6 weeks of leave and 0.953 percentage points (95% CI, 0.610-1.297) after 12 weeks of leave. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of new parents, therapy attendance decreased around childbirth, especially among parents with prior mental health needs and mothers with longer maternity leaves. These findings suggest that more accessible treatment, including home visits or telehealth appointments, is needed.


Sujet(s)
Personnel militaire , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Personnel militaire/psychologie , Personnel militaire/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , États-Unis , Études de cohortes , Période du postpartum/psychologie , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Mâle , Congé parental/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Mères/psychologie , Mères/statistiques et données numériques
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 599, 2024 May 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715039

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: In Mexico, this pioneering research was undertaken to assess the accessibility of timely diagnosis of Dyads [Children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and their primary caregivers] at specialized mental health services. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase involved designing an "Access Pathway" aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for ADHD diagnosis; several barriers, with only the teacher being identified as a facilitator. In the second phase, the study aimed to determine the time taken for dyads, to obtain a timely diagnosis at each stage of the Access Pathway. As well as identify any disparities based on gender and socioeconomic factors that might affect the age at which children can access a timely diagnosis. METHOD: In a retrospective cohort study, 177 dyads participated. To collect data, the Acceda Survey was used, based on the robust Conceptual Model Levesque, 2013. The survey consisted of 48 questions that were both dichotomous and polytomous allowing the creation of an Access Pathway that included five stages: the age of perception, the age of search, the age of first contact with a mental health professional, the age of arrival at the host hospital, and the age of diagnosis. The data was meticulously analyzed using a comprehensive descriptive approach and a nonparametric multivariate approach by sex, followed by post-hoc Mann-Whitney's U tests. Demographic factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: 71% of dyads experienced a late, significantly late, or highly late diagnosis of ADHD. Girls were detected one year later than boys. Both boys and girls took a year to seek specialized mental health care and an additional year to receive a formal specialized diagnosis. Children with more siblings had longer delays in diagnosis, while caregivers with formal employment were found to help obtain timely diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest starting the Access Pathway where signs and symptoms of ADHD are detected, particularly at school, to prevent children from suffering consequences. Mental health school-based service models have been successfully tested in other latitudes, making them a viable option to shorten the time to obtain a timely diagnosis.


Sujet(s)
Trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité , Diagnostic précoce , Accessibilité des services de santé , Services de santé mentale , Humains , Trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité/diagnostic , Trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité/épidémiologie , Enfant , Mâle , Femelle , Mexique/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Études rétrospectives , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Facteurs socioéconomiques
15.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 158, 2024 May 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720260

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The deployment of the mental health nurse, an additional healthcare provider for individuals in need of mental healthcare in Dutch general practices, was expected to substitute treatments from general practitioners and providers in basic and specialized mental healthcare (psychologists, psychotherapists, psychiatrists, etc.). The goal of this study was to investigate the extent to which the degree of mental health nurse deployment in general practices is associated with healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression. METHODS: We combined national health insurers' claims data with electronic health records from general practices. Healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression between 2014 and 2019 (N = 31,873) were analysed. The changes in the proportion of individuals treated after depression onset were assessed in association with the degree of mental health nurse deployment in general practices. RESULTS: The proportion of individuals with depression treated by the GP, in basic and specialized mental healthcare was lower in individuals in practices with high mental health nurse deployment. While the association between mental health nurse deployment and consultation in basic mental healthcare was smaller for individuals who depleted their deductibles, the association was still significant. Treatment volume of general practitioners was also lower in practices with higher levels of mental health nurse deployment. CONCLUSION: Individuals receiving care at a general practice with a higher degree of mental health nurse deployment have lower odds of being treated by mental healthcare providers in other healthcare settings. More research is needed to evaluate to what extent substitution of care from specialized mental healthcare towards general practices might be associated with waiting times for specialized mental healthcare.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé mentale , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Soins de santé primaires , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Soins de santé primaires/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Pays-Bas/épidémiologie , Acceptation des soins par les patients/statistiques et données numériques , Dépression/thérapie , Dépression/épidémiologie , Politique de santé , Soins infirmiers en psychiatrie , Dossiers médicaux électroniques/statistiques et données numériques , Médecine générale/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Sujet âgé
16.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1292603, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711766

RÉSUMÉ

Objective: The objective of this study is to examine mental health treatment utilization and interest among the large and growing demographic of single adults in the United States, who face unique societal stressors and pressures that may contribute to their heightened need for mental healthcare. Method: We analyzed data from 3,453 single adults, focusing on those with possible mental health treatment needs by excluding those with positive self-assessments. We assessed prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of mental health treatment, including psychotherapy and psychiatric medication use, and interest in attending psychotherapy among participants who had never attended. Results: 26% were in mental health treatment; 17% were attending psychotherapy, 16% were taking psychiatric medications, and 7% were doing both. Further, 64% had never attended psychotherapy, of which 35% expressed interest in future attendance. There were differences in current psychotherapy attendance and psychiatric medication use by gender and sexual orientation, with women and gay/lesbian individuals more likely to engage in both forms of mental health treatment. Additionally, interest in future psychotherapy among those who had never attended varied significantly by age, gender, and race. Younger individuals, women, and Black/African-American participants showed higher likelihoods of interest in psychotherapy. Conclusion: Our research highlights a critical gap in mental health treatment utilization among single adults who may be experiencing a need for those services. Despite a seemingly higher likelihood of engagement in mental health treatment compared to the general population, only a minority of single adults in our sample were utilizing mental health treatment. This underutilization and the observed demographic disparities in mental health treatment underscore the need for targeted outreach, personalized treatment plans, enhanced provider training, and policy advocacy to ensure equitable access to mental healthcare for single adults across sociodemographic backgrounds.


Sujet(s)
Troubles mentaux , Services de santé mentale , Psychothérapie , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , États-Unis , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Psychothérapie/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Jeune adulte , Analyse de données , Adolescent , Sujet âgé , Analyses secondaires des données
18.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e078635, 2024 May 23.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803249

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: People living in less urban areas in the UK may have reduced access to mental healthcare compared with people in urban areas. Although this was not reported in the 2000 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS) data, subsequent changes to mental health provision and economic recession may have impacted care inequalities. We re-examined this, hypothesising that those living in less urban areas of England received less antidepressant medication and psychological interventions, compared with those living in urban areas, after adjusting for covariates including common mental disorders (CMDs) and socioeconomic status. DESIGN: National cross-sectional study. SETTING: Households in England. PARTICIPANTS: We analysed data from 7455 participants aged 16 and above from the 2014 English APMS. EXPOSURES: Residence in an urban or less urban area. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Current receipt of any antidepressant medication or any psychological intervention. RESULTS: Participants living in less urban areas were half as likely to be in receipt of any psychological intervention relative to those living in urban areas (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.49; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79; p=0.004). There was no association between urbanisation and antidepressant receipt (aOR 1.01; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; p=0.944). CONCLUSION: People living in less urban areas have a lower likelihood of being in receipt of psychological treatment for CMDs, which may indicate barriers to care access. Our findings differ from the results of a study using a comparable sample conducted 14 years previously. While Improving Access to Psychological Therapies services have increased therapy access nationwide, this may have had more impact in urban areas, potentially widening urban/rural inequalities. Further research is needed to understand how to address such geographical inequalities in access to mental healthcare.


Sujet(s)
Accessibilité des services de santé , Troubles mentaux , Services de santé mentale , Humains , Études transversales , Adulte , Mâle , Femelle , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Angleterre/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adolescent , Jeune adulte , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Accessibilité des services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé , Disparités d'accès aux soins/statistiques et données numériques , Population urbaine/statistiques et données numériques , Antidépresseurs/usage thérapeutique , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Population rurale/statistiques et données numériques
19.
J Affect Disord ; 358: 89-96, 2024 Aug 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710332

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Over the past decades dozens of randomized trials have shown that psychological treatments are more effective than care-as-usual (CAU). It could be expected that these treatments are implemented in routine care and that the response rates in usual care improve over time. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to examine if response and remission rates in usual care have improved over time. METHODS: We used an existing meta-analytic database of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of psychological treatments of depression and selected CAU control groups from these trials. We only included CAU conditions in primary care, specialized mental health care, perinatal care and general medical care. The response rate (50 % symptom reduction) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: We included 125 CAU control groups (8542 participants). The response rate for all CAU control groups was 0.22 (95 % CI: 0.19; 0.24) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 83; 95 % CI: 80; 85), with somewhat higher rates in primary care (0.27; 95 % CI: 0.23; 0.31). We found hardly any indications that the outcomes have improved over the years. The meta-regression analysis with publication year as predictor in the full dataset resulted in a coefficient of 0.1 (SE = 0.01; p = 0.0.35). A series of sensitivity analyses supported the main findings. Remission rates and pre-post effect sizes also did not significantly improve over time. CONCLUSIONS: Response and remission rates in usual care are low, with the large majority of patients not responding or remitting, and the outcomes have probably not improved over time.


Sujet(s)
Dépression , Humains , Dépression/thérapie , Résultat thérapeutique , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Soins de santé primaires/statistiques et données numériques , Analyse de régression , Psychothérapie/méthodes , Trouble dépressif/thérapie , Induction de rémission
20.
N Z Med J ; 137(1595): 13-38, 2024 May 17.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754111

RÉSUMÉ

AIM: Mental health-related emergency department (ED) presentations are steadily increasing, including presentations for both mental health and non-mental health concerns by existing clients of mental health services. The study aim was to examine and compare mental health clients and non-clients' ED presentations, identify data and clinical gaps and make recommendations for improvement. METHOD: De-identified 2017/2018 ED data were used to describe presentations for current and recent (within last 5 years) clients of specialist public mental health and addiction services, compared to presentations of non-mental health clients. RESULTS: Of 49,170 presentations, 18% were by clients of mental health services. Compared to other ED presenters, mental health clients were often younger, female and Maori, required more urgent care and waited longer. Mental health-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes/referrals were most common for presentations by current mental health clients, whereas pain and trauma were often the reason for prior mental health clients' presentations. Discharge diagnoses rarely included self-harm behaviour, and admissions for these clients were more commonly by ED rather than mental health services. CONCLUSION: Mental health clients are common in ED. Enhanced mental health data capture and improved systems and processes are needed to ensure that ED staff can better meet their often-complex needs.


Sujet(s)
Service hospitalier d'urgences , Troubles mentaux , Services de santé mentale , Humains , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Mâle , Nouvelle-Zélande/épidémiologie , Adulte , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Troubles mentaux/thérapie , Services de santé mentale/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Jeune adulte , Adolescent , Sujet âgé , Hawaïen autochtone ou autre insulaire du Pacifique/statistiques et données numériques , Analyses secondaires des données
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...