Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 421
Filtrer
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(5): 101364, 2024 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574857

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Emergency Medicaid is a restricted benefits program for individuals who have low-income status and who are immigrants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 strategies of pregnancy coverage for Emergency Medicaid recipients: the federal minimum of covering the delivery only vs extended coverage to 60 days after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analytical Markov model was developed to evaluate the outcomes and costs of these policies, and the results in a theoretical cohort of 100,000 postpartum Emergency Medicaid recipients were considered. The payor perspective was adopted. Health outcomes and cost-effectiveness over a 1- and 3-year time horizon were investigated. All probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from the literature. Our primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the competing strategies. RESULTS: Extending Emergency Medicaid to 60 days after delivery was determined to be a cost-saving strategy. Providing postpartum and contraceptive care resulted in 33,900 additional people receiving effective contraception in the first year and prevented 7290 additional unintended pregnancies. Over 1 year, it resulted in a gain of 1566 quality-adjusted life year at a cost of $10,903 per quality-adjusted life year. By 3 years of policy change, greater improvements were observed in all outcomes, and the expansion of Emergency Medicaid became cost saving and the dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of postpartum care and contraception for immigrant women who have low-income status resulted in lower costs and improved health outcomes.


Sujet(s)
Analyse coût-bénéfice , Medicaid (USA) , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Grossesse , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Évaluation du Coût-Efficacité , Émigrants et immigrants/statistiques et données numériques , Chaines de Markov , Medicaid (USA)/économie , Prise en charge postnatale/économie , Prise en charge postnatale/méthodes , Prise en charge postnatale/statistiques et données numériques , Pauvreté , Grossesse non planifiée , États-Unis
2.
Healthc (Amst) ; 12(2): 100745, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603835

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: A growing literature documents how primary care practices adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examine a topic that has received less attention-how participants in an advanced alternative payment model perceive the model influenced their ability to meet patients' care needs during the pandemic. METHODS: Analysis of closed- and open-ended questions from a 2021 survey of 2496 practices participating in the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) model (92% response rate) and a 2021 survey of 993 randomly selected primary care physicians from these practices (55% response rate). Both surveys asked whether respondents agreed or disagreed that they or their practice was "better positioned to meet patients' care needs during the coronavirus pandemic" because of participation in CPC+. Both also included an open-ended question about CPC+'s effects. RESULTS: Half of practices and one-third of physicians agreed or strongly agreed that participating in CPC+ better positioned them to meet patients' care needs during the pandemic. One in 10 practices and 2 in 10 physicians, disagreed or strongly disagreed, while 4 in 10 practices and slightly more than half of physicians neither agreed nor disagreed (or, for physicians, didn't know). The most commonly identified CPC+ activities that facilitated meeting patient care needs related to practices' work on care management (e.g., risk stratification), access (e.g., telehealth), payment outside of fee-for-service (FFS), and staffing (e.g., supporting care managers). CONCLUSIONS: Most CPC+ practices and physicians were positive or neutral about participating in CPC+ in the context of COVID-19, indicating more benefit than risk to payment alternatives to FFS.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Humains , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/économie , COVID-19/thérapie , Soins de santé primaires/organisation et administration , Pandémies , Enquêtes et questionnaires , SARS-CoV-2 , Soins aux patients/méthodes , Soins aux patients/économie , États-Unis , Mécanismes de remboursement , Services de santé polyvalents/organisation et administration , Services de santé polyvalents/économie
3.
Arq. bras. neurocir ; 40(3): 210-214, 15/09/2021.
Article de Anglais | LILACS | ID: biblio-1362104

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction The carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal communication between the arterial carotid system and the cavernous sinus. In most cases, spontaneous fistulas are due to the rupture of intracavernous carotid artery aneurisms. Traumatic fistulas occur in 0.2% of head injuries, and 75% of all CCFs are caused by automobile accidents or penetrating traumas. Objective To identify the data regarding the number of annual procedures, hospital expenses, length of hospital stay, and the number of deaths of patients admitted by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, in the Portuguese acronym), in the period between 2007 and 2017, using the surgical code of the surgical treatment for CCF. Methods The present was an ecological study whose data were obtained by consulting the database provided by the Department of Computer Sciences of the Brazilian Unified Health System (Datasus, in Portuguese). Results A total of 85 surgical procedures were performed for the treatment of CCFs from January 2007 to October 2017 through the Unified Health System (SUS, in Portuguese), and there was a reduction of 71.42% in this period. The annual incidence of patients undergoing this surgical treatment during the period observed remained low, with 1 case per 13,135,714 in 2007, and 1 case per 51,925,000 in 2017. Conclusion Despite the low annual incidence of the surgical treatment of CCFs performed by the SUS in Brazil in the period of 2007­2017, based on the data obtained on the average length of stay and expenditures in hospital services, it is necessary that we develop an adequate health planning.


Sujet(s)
Procédures de chirurgie opératoire/économie , Système de Santé Unifié , Dépenses de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Fistule carotidocaverneuse/chirurgie , Brésil/épidémiologie , Interprétation statistique de données , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Traumatismes cranioencéphaliques/épidémiologie , Durée du séjour/économie
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(8): e2119080, 2021 08 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34387681

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Although a majority of underinsured and uninsured patients with cancer have multiple comorbidities, many lack consistent connections with a primary care team to manage chronic conditions during and after cancer treatment. This presents a major challenge to delivering high-quality comprehensive and coordinated care. Objective: To describe challenges and opportunities for coordinating care in an integrated safety-net system for patients with both cancer and other chronic conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multimodal qualitative study was conducted from May 2016 to July 2019 at a county-funded, vertically integrated safety-net health system including ambulatory oncology, urgent care, primary care, and specialty care. Participants were 93 health system stakeholders (clinicians, leaders, clinical, and administrative staff) strategically and snowball sampled for semistructured interviews and observation during meetings and daily processes of care. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively using a grounded theory approach, followed by systematic thematic analysis to organize data, review, and interpret comprehensive findings. Data were analyzed from March 2019 to March 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multilevel factors associated with experiences of coordinating care for patients with cancer and chronic conditions among oncology and primary care stakeholders. Results: Among interviews and observation of 93 health system stakeholders, system-level factors identified as being associated with care coordination included challenges to accessing primary care, lack of communication between oncology and primary care clinicians, and leadership awareness of care coordination challenges. Clinician-level factors included unclear role delineation and lack of clinician knowledge and preparedness to manage the effects of cancer and chronic conditions. Conclusions and Relevance: Primary care may play a critical role in delivering coordinated care for patients with cancer and chronic diseases. This study's findings suggest a need for care delivery strategies that bridge oncology and primary care by enhancing communication, better delineating roles and responsibilities across care teams, and improving clinician knowledge and preparedness to care for patients with cancer and chronic conditions. Expanding timely access to primary care is also key, albeit challenging in resource-limited safety-net settings.


Sujet(s)
Maladie chronique/thérapie , Services de santé polyvalents/organisation et administration , Personnes sans assurance médicale , Tumeurs/thérapie , Participation des parties prenantes/psychologie , Adulte , Soins ambulatoires/économie , Soins ambulatoires/organisation et administration , Survivants du cancer , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Femelle , Théorie ancrée , Accessibilité des services de santé/économie , Accessibilité des services de santé/organisation et administration , Humains , Mâle , Oncologie médicale/économie , Oncologie médicale/organisation et administration , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analyse multiniveaux , Tumeurs/complications , Tumeurs/économie , Soins de santé primaires/économie , Soins de santé primaires/organisation et administration , Recherche qualitative , Professionnels du filet de sécurité sanitaire/économie , Professionnels du filet de sécurité sanitaire/organisation et administration
5.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 68(3): 651-658, 2021 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34044991

RÉSUMÉ

The integrated behavioral health care model in primary care has the potential to reduce barriers to care experienced by children and families from ethnic minorities and low socioeconomic status. Limited access to pediatric behavioral health care is a significant problem, with up to 40% of children and adolescents with identified mental disorders and only 30% of them receiving care. Barriers include transportation, insurance, and shortage of specialists. Primary care provider bias, decreased knowledge and feelings of competence, and cultural beliefs and stigma also affect earlier diagnosis and treatment, particularly for Hispanic families with low English proficiency and African Americans.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé polyvalents , Accessibilité des services de santé , Services de santé mentale , Pédiatrie , Adolescent , , Enfant , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Services de santé polyvalents/normes , Compétence culturelle , Ethnies , Accessibilité des services de santé/économie , Accessibilité des services de santé/normes , Disparités d'accès aux soins , Hispanique ou Latino , Humains , Services de santé mentale/économie , Services de santé mentale/normes , Pédiatrie/économie , Pédiatrie/normes , Soins de santé primaires/économie , Soins de santé primaires/organisation et administration , Soins de santé primaires/normes , Racisme , Classe sociale , Facteurs socioéconomiques
7.
Cancer ; 127(11): 1901-1911, 2021 06 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33465248

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Individuals diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) between the ages of 22 and 39 years experience worse outcomes than those diagnosed when they are 21 years old or younger. Treatment at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) mitigates these disparities but may be associated with higher expenditures. METHODS: Using deidentified administrative claims data (OptumLabs Data Warehouse), the cancer-related expenditures were examined among patients with ALL diagnosed between 2001 and 2014. Multivariable generalized linear model with log-link modeled average monthly health-plan-paid (HPP) expenditures and amount owed by the patient (out-of-pocket [OOP]). Cost ratios were used to calculate excess expenditures (CCC vs non-CCC). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) compared CCC and non-CCC monthly visit rates. Models adjusted for sociodemographics, comorbidities, adverse events, and months enrolled. RESULTS: Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between CCC (n = 160) and non-CCC (n = 139) patients. Higher monthly outpatient expenditures in CCC patients ($15,792 vs $6404; P < .001) were driven by outpatient hospital HPP expenditures. Monthly visit rates and per visit expenditures for nonchemotherapy visits (IRR = 1.6; P = .001; CCC = $8247, non-CCC = $1191) drove higher outpatient hospital expenditures among CCCs. Monthly OOP expenditures were higher at CCCs for outpatient care (P = .02). Inpatient HPP expenditures were significantly higher at CCCs ($25,918 vs $13,881; ꞵ = 0.9; P < .001) before accounting for adverse events but were no longer significant after adjusting for adverse events (ꞵ = 0.4; P = .1). Hospitalizations and length of stay were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults with ALL at CCCs have higher expenditures, likely reflecting differences in facility structure, billing practices, and comprehensive patient care. It would be reasonable to consider CCCs comparable to the oncology care model and incentivize the framework to achieve superior outcomes and long-term cost savings. LAY SUMMARY: Health care expenditures in young adults (aged 22-39 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are higher among patients at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) than those at non-CCCs. The CCC/non-CCC differences are significant among outpatient expenditures, which are driven by higher rates of outpatient hospital visits and outpatient hospital expenditures per visit at CCCs. Higher expenditures and visit rates of outpatient hospital visits among CCCs may also reflect how facility structure and billing patterns influence spending or comprehensive care. Young adults at CCCs face higher inpatient HPP expenditures; these are driven by serious adverse events.


Sujet(s)
Établissements de cancérologie , Dépenses de santé , Leucémie-lymphome lymphoblastique à précurseurs B et T , Adulte , Soins ambulatoires/économie , Établissements de cancérologie/économie , Établissements de cancérologie/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Dépenses de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Hospitalisation/économie , Humains , National Cancer Institute (USA)/économie , Leucémie-lymphome lymphoblastique à précurseurs B et T/économie , Leucémie-lymphome lymphoblastique à précurseurs B et T/thérapie , États-Unis , Jeune adulte
9.
Health Serv Res ; 56(3): 371-377, 2021 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197047

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: To develop two practice-site-level measures of comprehensiveness and examine their associations with patient outcomes, and how their performance differs from physician-level measures. DATA SOURCES: Medicare fee-for-service claims. STUDY DESIGN: We calculated practice-site-level comprehensiveness measures (new problem management and involvement in patient conditions) across 5286 primary care physicians (PCPs) at 1339 practices in the Comprehensive Primary Care initiative evaluation in 2013. We assessed their associations with practices' attributed beneficiaries' 2014 total Medicare expenditures, hospitalization rates, ED visit rates. We also examined variation in PCPs' comprehensiveness across PCPs within practices versus between primary care practices. Finally, we compared associations of practice-site and PCP-level measures with outcomes. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The measures had good variation across primary care practices, strong validity, and high reliability. Receiving primary care from a practice at the 75th versus 25th percentile on the involvement in patient conditions measure was associated with $21.93 (2.8%) lower total Medicare expenditures per beneficiary per month (P < .01). Receiving primary care from a practice at the 75th versus 25th percentile on the new problem management measure was associated with $14.77 (1.9%) lower total Medicare expenditures per beneficiary per month (P < .05); 8.84 (3.0%) fewer hospitalizations (P < .001), and 21.27 (3.1%) fewer ED visits per thousand beneficiaries per year (P < .01). PCP comprehensiveness varied more within than between practices. CONCLUSIONS: More comprehensive primary care practices had lower Medicare FFS expenditures, hospitalization, and ED visit rates. Both PCP and practice-site level comprehensiveness measures had strong construct and predictive validity; PCP-level measures were more precise.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé polyvalents/organisation et administration , Enquêtes sur les soins de santé/normes , Medicare (USA)/économie , Soins de santé primaires/organisation et administration , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Services de santé polyvalents/normes , Régimes de rémunération à l'acte , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients , Médecins/psychologie , Soins de santé primaires/économie , Soins de santé primaires/normes , Reproductibilité des résultats , Facteurs sexuels , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Enquêtes et questionnaires , États-Unis
10.
Multimedia | Ressources multimédias | ID: multimedia-6758

RÉSUMÉ

érie de rodas de conversas com lideranças dos coletivos negros, do campo, indígenas, LGBTs e feministas que representam o segmento das e para as políticas de equidade do Ministério da Saúde. As rodas de conversas, no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19, são promovidas pelo Observatório de Determinantes Sociais em Saúde (DSS) e pela Escola Tocantinense do Sistema Único de Saúde (ETSUS). Participantes: 1. Bernadete Ferreira - Msc. em Direitos Humanos e Prestação Jurisdicional, fundadora da Casa 8 de Março no Tocantins, feminista da Articulação de Mulheres Brasileiras; 2. Fabiana Scoleso - Socióloga, especialista, mestre e doutora em História Social pela PUC-SP, professora da UFT; 3. Karoline Chaves - Advogada feminista especializada nos direitos das mulheres e pessoas LGBTs, mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional pela UFT; 4. Monica Bandeira - Enfermeira especialista e mestra em Saúde Pública, professora de Enfermagem da UFT, servidora da SEMUS e presidenta da ABEn-TO. Mediadora: Andrea Montalvão - Assistente Social da ETSUS, mestre em Saúde Coletiva, especialista em Gestão em Saúde, professora na UFT.


Sujet(s)
Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Santé des femmes , Système de Santé Unifié/organisation et administration , Violence sexiste , Violence Contre les Femmes , Féminisme , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Politique publique/économie , Protection Sociale en Santé/politiques , Décès maternel/prévention et contrôle , Service de santé pour les femmes/organisation et administration , Minorités sexuelles , Services de santé polyvalents/organisation et administration , Activisme politique
11.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(11): 2478-2485, 2020 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975812

RÉSUMÉ

Access to comprehensive dementia care is limited. Recent changes in billing for professional services, including new physician fee schedule codes, encourage clinicians to provide new services; however, current reimbursement does not cover costs for all needed elements of dementia care. The Payment Model for Comprehensive Dementia Care Conference convened more than 50 national experts from diverse perspectives to review promising strategies for payment reform including ways to accelerate their adoption. Recommendations for reform included payments for services to family caregivers; new research to determine success metrics; education for consumers, providers, and policymakers; and advancing a population health model approach to tier coverage based on risk and need within a health system.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Démence/thérapie , Aidants/économie , Congrès comme sujet , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/tendances , Démence/économie , Barème d'honoraires , Réforme des soins de santé/économie , Réforme des soins de santé/organisation et administration , Humains , Medicaid (USA) , Medicare (USA) , Mécanismes de remboursement/économie , Mécanismes de remboursement/organisation et administration , États-Unis
12.
Health Serv Res ; 55(4): 541-547, 2020 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32700385

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: We aim to assess whether system providers perform better than nonsystem providers under an alternative payment model that incentivizes high-quality, cost-efficient care. We posit that the payment environment and the incentives it provides can affect the relative performance of vertically integrated health systems. To examine this potential influence, we compare system and nonsystem hospitals participating in Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. DATA SOURCES: We used hospital cost and quality data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services linked to data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Compendium of US Health Systems and hospital characteristics from secondary sources. The data include 706 hospitals in 67 metropolitan areas. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated regressions that compared system and nonsystem hospitals' 2017 cost and quality performance providing lower joint replacements among hospitals required to participate in CJR. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among CJR hospitals, system hospitals that provided comprehensive services in their local market had 5.8 percent ($1612) lower episode costs (P = .01) than nonsystem hospitals. System hospitals that did not provide such services had 3.5 percent ($967) lower episode costs (P = .14). Quality differences between system hospitals and nonsystem hospitals were mostly small and statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: When operating under alternative payment model incentives, vertical integration may enable hospitals to lower costs with similar quality scores.


Sujet(s)
Arthroplastie prothétique de hanche/économie , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/économie , Coûts hospitaliers/statistiques et données numériques , Medicare (USA)/économie , Bouquets de soins des patients/économie , Mécanismes de remboursement/économie , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Arthroplastie prothétique de hanche/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé polyvalents/statistiques et données numériques , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Medicare (USA)/statistiques et données numériques , Bouquets de soins des patients/statistiques et données numériques , Mécanismes de remboursement/statistiques et données numériques , États-Unis
13.
Multimedia | Ressources multimédias | ID: multimedia-5162

RÉSUMÉ

O ministro da Saúde, Luiz Henrique Mandetta, lançou ontem no Palácio do Planalto o Programa Previne Brasil – nova proposta de financiamento da Atenção Primária à Saúde para ampliar o acesso da população a consultas médicas, exames e outros serviços ofertados na APS.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Financement des soins de santé , Infections à coronavirus/prévention et contrôle , Système de Santé Unifié/économie
14.
Multimedia | Ressources multimédias | ID: multimedia-5163

RÉSUMÉ

Aproximadamente 220 pessoas – gestores, especialistas, profissionais e estudantes de saúde – estiveram reunidos ontem e hoje (7 e 8), na Escola de Saúde Pública da Bahia, no 1º Encontro Regional de Saúde do Nordeste, promovido pela Secretaria de Estado da Saúde da Bahia e pelo Conass, com apoio do Consórcio Nordeste. Participaram da abertura do encontro o anfitrião, secretário Fábio Vilas-Boas (SES/BA); o presidente do Conass, Alberto Beltrame (SES/PA); o representante da Opas, Renato Tasca; a presidente do Cebes, Lucia Souto; a presidente da Abrasco, Gulnar Azevedo; e o vice-presidente do Cosems/BA, Raul Molina.


Sujet(s)
Système de Santé Unifié/économie , Planification/politiques , Financement des soins de santé , Services de santé polyvalents/économie
15.
Multimedia | Ressources multimédias | ID: multimedia-5166

RÉSUMÉ

Aproximadamente 220 pessoas – gestores, especialistas, profissionais e estudantes de saúde – estiveram reunidos ontem e hoje (7 e 8), na Escola de Saúde Pública da Bahia, no 1º Encontro Regional de Saúde do Nordeste, promovido pela Secretaria de Estado da Saúde da Bahia e pelo Conass, com apoio do Consórcio Nordeste. Participaram da abertura do encontro o anfitrião, secretário Fábio Vilas-Boas (SES/BA); o presidente do Conass, Alberto Beltrame (SES/PA); o representante da Opas, Renato Tasca; a presidente do Cebes, Lucia Souto; a presidente da Abrasco, Gulnar Azevedo; e o vice-presidente do Cosems/BA, Raul Molina.


Sujet(s)
Systèmes de Santé Locaux/organisation et administration , Planification/politiques , 16672/tendances , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Couverture maladie universelle/organisation et administration , Système de Santé Unifié
16.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 18(1): 49, 2020 May 22.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32443970

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: In rural settings where patients face significant structural barriers to accessing healthcare services, the formal existence of government-provided health coverage does not necessarily translate to meaningful care delivery. This paper analyses the effectiveness of an innovative approach to overcome these barriers, the Right to Health Care programme offered by Compañeros en Salud in Chiapas, Mexico. This programme provides comprehensive free coverage of all additional direct and indirect medical costs as well as accompaniment through the medical system. Over 550 patients had participated from 2013 until November 2018. METHODS: Focusing on ten of the most frequently treated conditions, including hernias, cataracts and congenital heart defects, we performed a retrospective case study analysis of the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from treatment and the cost per QALY for 69 patients. This analysis used disability weights and uncertainty intervals from the Global Burden of Disease study and organisational micro-costing data for each patient. Each patient was compared to their own hypothetical counterfactual health outcome had they not received the secondary and tertiary care required for the specific condition. A mixed methods approach is used to establish this counterfactual baseline, drawing on pre-intervention observations, qualitative interviews and established literature precedent. RESULTS: The programme was found to deliver an average of 14.4 additional QALYs (95% uncertainty interval 12.4-15.8) without time discounting. The mean cost per QALY over these conditions was $388 USD (95% UI $262-588) at purchasing power parity. CONCLUSIONS: These numbers compare favourably with studies of other health services and international cost per QALY guidelines. They reflect the on-treatment effect for the ten conditions analysed and are presented as a case study indicative of the promise of healthcare intermediaries rather than a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness. Nonetheless, these results show the potential feasibility and cost effectiveness of a more comprehensive approach to healthcare provision in a resource-limited rural setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study involves economic analysis of a programme facilitating access to public healthcare services. Thus, there was no associated clinical trial to be registered.


Sujet(s)
Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Coûts des soins de santé , Accessibilité des services de santé/économie , Organismes/économie , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Population rurale , Activités de la vie quotidienne , Femelle , Services de santé , Droits de l'homme , Humains , Longévité , Mâle , Mexique , Soins aux patients , Qualité de vie , Études rétrospectives
17.
Haemophilia ; 26(4): 622-630, 2020 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311205

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Nurses play a central co-ordinating role in delivering comprehensive care for people with haemophilia and allied bleeding disorders, for which they need a broad range of competencies. The UK Haemophilia Nurses Association (HNA) published a role description in 1994 which was developed into a competency framework in 2014. This has now been updated to reflect current educational and clinical practice. AIM: To summarize the evidence supporting the nurse's advanced role within haemophilia care and develop new competencies to deliver comprehensive care within a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Systematic reviews were identified by PubMed literature search. The HNA conducted workshops to consult its membership, and the authors incorporated this input to update its competency framework within the structure outlined by Health Education England in multiprofessional framework for advanced clinical practice in England (2017). RESULTS: The proposed framework includes five domains (Clinical knowledge, Clinical/direct care, Communication and support, Collaborative practice and Research) supported by indicators for four levels of practice (beginner, competent, proficient and expert). The framework is a tool which nurses and their managers can use to assess skills and knowledge, and identify learning needs appropriate to personal development and improve patient care and outcomes. CONCLUSION: The HNA has developed a new competency framework to provide a strong foundation for haemophilia specialist nurses to continue improving services for people living with bleeding disorders and their families, as well as supporting personal development alongside new therapeutic options, models of care and follow-up.


Sujet(s)
Compétence clinique/normes , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Hémophilie A/soins infirmiers , Rôle de l'infirmier/histoire , Adulte , Attitude du personnel soignant , Enfant , Communication , Services de santé polyvalents/éthique , Analyse coût-bénéfice/économie , Prestations des soins de santé/éthique , Femelle , Hémophilie A/thérapie , Histoire du 21ème siècle , Humains , Mâle , Qualité des soins de santé/éthique , Royaume-Uni/épidémiologie
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(4): e202019, 2020 04 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32239223

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Consolidation among physician practices and between hospitals and physician practices has accelerated in the past decade, resulting in higher prices in commercial markets. The resulting integration of health care across clinicians and participation in alternative payment models (APMs), which aim to improve quality while constraining spending, are cited as reasons for consolidation, but little is known about the association between integration and APM participation. Objective: To examine the association of organizational characteristics, ownership, and integration with intensity of participation in APMs among physician practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional descriptive study, adjusted for sampling and nonresponse weights, was conducted in US physician practice respondents to the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems conducted between June 16, 2017, and August 17, 2018; of 2333 responses received (response rate, 46.9%) and after exclusion of ineligible and incomplete responses, the number of practices included in the analysis was 2061. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2019, to August 31, 2019. Exposures: Self-reported physician practice characteristics, including ownership, integration (clinical, cultural, financial, and functional), care delivery capabilities, activities, and environmental factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participation in APMs: (1) bundled payments, (2) comprehensive primary care and medical home programs, (3) pay-for-performance programs, (4) capitated contracts with commercial health plans, and (5) accountable care organization contracts. Results: A total of 49.2% of the 2061 practices included reported participating in 3 or more APMs; most participated in pay-for-performance and accountable care organization models. Covariate-adjusted analyses suggested that operating within a health care system (odds ratio [OR] for medical group: 2.35; 95% CI, 1.70-3.25; P < .001; simple health system: 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.97; P = .02; and complex health system: 1.76; 95% CI, 1.25-2.47; P = .001 relative to independent practices), greater clinical (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.28-9.59; P < .001) and functional (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 2.00-8.97; P < .001) integration, and being located in the Northeast (OR for Midwest: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65; P < .001; South: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.66; P < .001; and West: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; P = .01) were associated with greater APM participation. Conclusions and Relevance: Greater APM participation appears to be supported by integration and system ownership.


Sujet(s)
Cabinets de groupe/économie , Hôpitaux/statistiques et données numériques , Médecins/économie , Remboursement incitatif/économie , Accountable care organizations (USA)/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Études transversales , Pratique factuelle/méthodes , Géographie/économie , Coûts des soins de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Coûts des soins de santé/tendances , Dépenses de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Propriété/économie , Soins centrés sur le patient/économie , Soins centrés sur le patient/méthodes , Médecins/organisation et administration , Remboursement incitatif/statistiques et données numériques , Autorapport/statistiques et données numériques
20.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 36(3): 450-458, 2020 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29939810

RÉSUMÉ

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services has specifically targeted total joint replacements with a retrospective bundled payment program called the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model to improve collaboration between providers and decrease costs associated with the surgery and subsequent rehabilitation. The purpose of this report is to describe the physical therapy post-acute episode of care of a patient receiving services under the CJR model and illustrate the impact of facility policy changes on physical therapy service delivery, length of stay, cost of care, and patient outcomes in a post-acute environment. Case Description: The patient was a 78-year-old woman who underwent an elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). She had moderate mobility impairments (total activities of daily living [ADL] score of 6) and was a high fall risk as scored by the Physical Mobility Scale and Tinetti Mobility Test, respectively. Physical therapy interventions focused on exercises to decrease activity limitations and participation restrictions. Outcomes: The patient demonstrated significant improvements in physical function after 22 total physical therapy visits spanning her Skilled Nursing Facility and subsequent outpatient treatment resulting in an intrafacility cost reduction of 52%. Compared with the average number of visits and costs for post-acute care following a TKA, this patient's care, under the CJR model, involved less cost and required fewer visits. Conclusions: This case report supports some of the proposed benefits of the CJR model for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing TKA.


Sujet(s)
Arthroplastie prothétique de genou/économie , Arthroplastie prothétique de genou/rééducation et réadaptation , Services de santé polyvalents/économie , Techniques de physiothérapie/économie , Assurance de la qualité des soins de santé , Sujet âgé , , Évaluation de l'invalidité , Femelle , Humains , Amplitude articulaire , Études rétrospectives , Soins de suite , États-Unis
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE