Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 868
Filtrer
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 18767, 2024 08 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138276

RÉSUMÉ

The vaccination against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an important public health strategy to prevent people from the pandemic. Vaccines are a game-changing tool, it is essential to understand the adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination. This study explored the adverse events of COVID-19 Vaccination Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson on Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). In this study, initially 128 documents were identified from the databases, including Pub-Med, Web of Science-Clarivate Analytics, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The articles on COVID-19 vaccination and GBs were searched using the keywords "SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Vaccination, and Guillain Barré Syndrome, GBS", finally, 16 documents were included in the analysis and synthesis. After administering 1,680,042,214 doses of COVID-19 vaccines, 6177 cases were identified with 10.5 cases per million vaccine doses. A significant positive risk was found between COVID-19 vaccine administration and GBS with a risk rate of RR 1.97 (95% CI 1.26-3.08, p = 0.01). The mRNA vaccines were associated with 2076 cases, and 1,237,638,401 vaccine doses were linked with 4.47 GBS events per million vaccine doses. The first dose of the m-RNA vaccine was associated with 8.83 events per million doses compared to the second dose with 02 events per million doses. The viral-vector vaccine doses 193,535,249 were linked to 1630 GBS cases with 11.01 cases per million doses. The incidence of GBS after the first dose was 17.43 compared to 1.47 cases per million in the second dose of the viral-vector vaccine. The adverse events of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine were linked to 1339 cases of GBS following 167,786,902 vaccine doses, with 14.2 cases per million doses. The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine significantly increased the risk of GBS RR: 2.96 (95% CI 2.51-3.48, p = 0.01). For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, there were 7.20 cases per million doses of the vaccine, and no significant association was identified between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and GBS incidence RR: 0.99 (95% CI 0.75-1.32, p = 0.96). Moderna vaccine was related with 419 cases of GBS after administering 420,420,909 doses, with 2.26 cases per million doses. However, Johnson and Johnson's vaccination was linked to 235 GBS after 60,256,913 doses of the vaccine with 8.80 cases per million doses. A significant association was seen between the risk of GBS and Ad.26.COV2. S vaccine, RR: 2.47 (95% CI 1.30-4.69, p < 0.01). Overall, a significant association was seen between the COVID-19 vaccines and the risk of GBS. The incidence of GBS was higher after the first dose compared to GBS cases per million in the second dose.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , Vaccin BNT162/effets indésirables , Vaccin ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/effets indésirables , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/induit chimiquement , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Vaccination/effets indésirables
2.
J Neurol Sci ; 463: 123140, 2024 Aug 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047509

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) can lead to significant functional impairments, yet little is understood about the recovery phase and long-term consequences for patients in low- and medium-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional status and identify factors influencing outcomes among patients with GBS in Colombia. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with GBS patients enrolled in the Neuroviruses Emerging in the Americas Study between 2016 and 2020. The investigation encompassed access to health services and functional status assessments, utilizing the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), GBS Disability Score (GDS), Barthel Index (BI), and International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Univariate analysis, principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, and linear regression were employed to explore factors influencing functional status. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (mean age = 50[±22] years) with a median time from diagnosis of 28 months (IQR = 9-34) were included. Notably, 22% and 16% of patients did not receive rehabilitation services during the acute episode and post-discharge, respectively. Most patients demonstrated independence in basic daily activities (median BI = 100, IQR = 77.5-100), improvement in disability as the median mRS at follow-up was lower than at onset (1 [IQR = 0-3] vs. 4.5 [IQR = 4-5], p < 0.001), and most were able to walk without assistance (median GDS = 2, IQR = 0-2). A shorter period from disease onset to interview was associated with worse mRS (p = 0.015) and ICF (p = 0.019). Negative outcomes on GDS and ICF were linked to low socioeconomic status, ICF to the severity of weakness at onset, and BI to an older age. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores that the functional recovery of GBS patients in Colombia is influenced not only by the natural course of the disease but also by socioeconomic factors, emphasizing the crucial role of social determinants of health.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Infection par le virus Zika , Humains , Colombie/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnostic , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Infection par le virus Zika/épidémiologie , Infection par le virus Zika/complications , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Évaluation de l'invalidité , Épidémies , Récupération fonctionnelle , État fonctionnel
3.
Infect Dis Now ; 54(5): 104938, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885813

RÉSUMÉ

Chikungunya disease typically presents with the fever-arthralgia-rash symptom triad. However, an increase in the number of atypical clinical manifestations, particularly neurological disorders, has occurred. The current evidence regarding the pooled prevalence of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV)-associated neurological cases (CANCs) suspected of having an arboviral aetiology is not well-understood. Therefore, this meta-analysis included 19 studies (n = 7319 patients) and aimed to determine the pooled rate of exposure to CANC. The pooled positivity rate of CANC was 12 % (95 % CI: 6-19), and Brazil was overrepresented (11/19). These estimations varied between 3 and 14 % based on the diagnostic method (real-time PCR vs. ELISA-IgM) and biological samples (cerebrospinal fluid or blood specimens) used for detection of CHIKV. Regarding the frequency of CHIKV in neurological clinical subgroups, the rates were higher among patients with myelitis (27 %), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (27 %), Guillain-Barré syndrome (15 %), encephalitis (12 %), and meningoencephalitis (7 %). Our analysis highlights the significant burden of CANC. However, the data must be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of the results, which may be related to the location of the studies covering endemic periods and/or outbreaks of CHIKV. Current surveillance resources should also focus on better characterizing the epidemiology of CHIKV infection in neurological disorders. Additionally, future studies should investigate the interactions between CHIKV and neurological diseases with the aim of gaining deeper insight into the mechanisms underlying the cause-and-effect relationship between these two phenomena.


Sujet(s)
Fièvre chikungunya , Virus du chikungunya , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Maladies du système nerveux , Humains , Brésil/épidémiologie , Fièvre chikungunya/épidémiologie , Fièvre chikungunya/diagnostic , Virus du chikungunya/isolement et purification , Encéphalomyélite aigüe disséminée/épidémiologie , Encéphalomyélite aigüe disséminée/virologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/virologie , Méningoencéphalite/épidémiologie , Méningoencéphalite/virologie , Myélite/épidémiologie , Myélite/virologie , Maladies du système nerveux/épidémiologie , Maladies du système nerveux/virologie , Prévalence
4.
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis ; 25(4): 178-183, 2024 Jun 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771227

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Several neurological complications have been reported with COVID-19, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). We looked at incidence, baseline characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19-associated GBS in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the US National Inpatient Sample database to identify hospitalizations for COVID-19 and GBS, using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, codes G610 and G650 for GBS and U071 for COVID-19. The codes used in this study are listed in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (see e Appendix, http://links.lww.com/JCND/A69). RESULTS: In total, 13,705 GBS admissions were recorded nationwide in 2020; of these, 1155 (8.43%) were associated with COVID-19. The frequency of GBS in COVID-19 admissions was 0.07%, compared with 0.08% in non-COVID-19 admissions (P = 0.8166). COVID-19 cohort with GBS had higher utilization of invasive mechanical ventilation (20.8% vs. 11.8%, P < 0.001) in comparison with COVID-19 cohort without GBS. GBS admissions with COVID-19 exhibited significantly higher inpatient mortality (12.2% vs. 3%, P < 0.001) compared with GBS admissions without COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: Our findings underscore GBS as a rare yet severe complication of COVID-19, highlighting a significant difference in mortality when compared with GBS not associated with COVID-19.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Hospitalisation , Humains , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/complications , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Sujet âgé , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Incidence , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventilation artificielle/statistiques et données numériques , Mortalité hospitalière
5.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3486-3492, 2024 May 31.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704258

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: While safety of influenza vaccines is well-established, some studies have suggested potential associations between influenza vaccines and certain adverse events (AEs). This study examined the safety of the 2022-2023 influenza vaccines among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. METHODS: A self-controlled case series compared incidence rates of anaphylaxis, encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), and transverse myelitis following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations (i.e., any, high-dose or adjuvanted) in risk and control intervals among Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years. We used conditional Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for event-dependent observation time and seasonality. Analyses also accounted for uncertainty from outcome misclassification where feasible. For AEs with any statistically significant associations, we stratified results by concomitant vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 12.7 million vaccine recipients, we observed 76 anaphylaxis, 276 encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, 134 GBS and 75 transverse myelitis cases. Only rates of anaphylaxis were elevated in risk compared to control intervals. With all adjustments, an elevated, but non-statistically significant, anaphylaxis rate was observed following any (IRR: 2.40, 95% CI: 0.96-6.03), high-dose (IRR: 2.31, 95% CI: 0.67-7.91), and adjuvanted (IRR: 3.28, 95% CI: 0.71-15.08) influenza vaccination; anaphylaxis IRRs were 2.54 (95% CI: 0.49-13.05) and 1.64 (95% CI: 0.38-7.05) for persons with and without concomitant vaccination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, GBS, or transverse myelitis were not elevated following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. There was an increased rate of anaphylaxis following influenza vaccination that may have been influenced by concomitant vaccination.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins antigrippaux , Grippe humaine , Vaccination , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Anaphylaxie/épidémiologie , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/étiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/induit chimiquement , Incidence , Vaccins antigrippaux/effets indésirables , Vaccins antigrippaux/administration et posologie , Grippe humaine/prévention et contrôle , Grippe humaine/épidémiologie , Medicare (USA)/statistiques et données numériques , Myélite transverse/épidémiologie , Myélite transverse/étiologie , Saisons , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Vaccination/effets indésirables
6.
J Affect Disord ; 357: 171-178, 2024 Jul 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703912

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune disease that typically develops after a previous gastrointestinal (GI) infection. However, the exact association between Gut Microbiota (GM) and GBS still remains unknown due to various challenges. This study aimed to investigate the potential causal association between GM and GBS by using a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (TSMR) analysis. METHODS: Utilizing the largest available genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis from the MiBioGen consortium (n = 13,266) as a foundation, we conducted a TSMR to decipher the causal relationship between GM and GBS. Various analytical methods were employed, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger, and weighted median. The heterogeneity of instrumental variables (IVs) was assessed using Cochran's Q statistics. RESULTS: The analysis identified three microbial taxa with a significantly increased risk association for GBS, including Ruminococcus gnavus group (OR = 1.40, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.83), Ruminococcus gauvreauii group (OR = 1.51, 95 % CI: 1.02-2.25), and Ruminococcaceae UCG009 (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.97), while Eubacterium brachy group (OR = 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.10-1.87) and Romboutsia (OR = 1.67, 95 % CI: 1.12-2.47) showed a suggestively causal association. On the other hand, Ruminococcaceae UCG004 (OR = 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.91) had a protective effect on GBS, while Bacilli (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.38-0.96), Gamma proteobacteria (OR = 0.63, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.98) and Lachnospiraceae UCG001 (OR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.49-0.96) showed a suggestively protective association for GBS. CONCLUSION: The MR analysis suggests a potential causal relationship between specific GM taxa and the risk of GBS. However, further extensive research involving diversified populations is imperative to validate these findings.


Sujet(s)
Microbiome gastro-intestinal , Étude d'association pangénomique , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Analyse de randomisation mendélienne , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/microbiologie , Humains , Microbiome gastro-intestinal/génétique , Ruminococcus/génétique , Facteurs de risque
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 541, 2024 May 30.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816802

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Most studies investigated the relationship between COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) by comparing the incidence of GBS before and during the pandemic of COVID-19. However, the findings were inconsistent, probably owing to varying degrees of the lockdown policy. The quarantine requirements and travel restrictions in China were lifted around December 7, 2022. This study aimed to explore whether the relative frequency of GBS increased during the major outbreak in the absence of COVID-19-mandated social restrictions in China. METHODS: GBS patients admitted to the First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, from December 7, 2022 to February 20, 2023, and from June, 2017 to August, 2019 were included. The relative frequencies of GBS in hospitalized patients during different periods were compared. The patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection within six weeks prior to GBS onset formed the COVID-GBS group and non-COVID-GBS group, respectively. RESULTS: The relative frequency of GBS among hospitalized patients during the major outbreak of COVID-19 (13/14,408) was significantly higher than that before the COVID-19 epidemic (29/160,669, P < 0.001). More COVID-GBS patients (11/13) presented AIDP subtype than non-COVID-GBS cases (10/27, P = 0.003). The mean interval between onset of infective symptoms and GBS was longer in COVID-GBS (21.54 ± 11.56 days) than in non-COVID-GBS (5.76 ± 3.18 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 significantly increased the incidence of GBS. Most COVID-GBS patients fell into the category of AIDP, responded well to IVIg, and had a favorable prognosis.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , SARS-CoV-2 , Humains , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Chine/épidémiologie , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Incidence , Sujet âgé , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Pandémies , Adolescent
10.
Pediatr Neurol ; 155: 177-181, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669800

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive research on Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in adults and children, there is a lack of comparison regarding short-term outcomes in various age groups. Our study aims to elucidate the differences in clinical features and short-term outcomes in Vietnam. METHODS: After retrospective data collection, we compared clinical features in patients with GBS aged ≤16 years at Children's Hospital 2 and aged >16 years at University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City from 2017 to 2021. A positive short-term outcome was recorded if patients had a GBS Disability Score of 0 to 2 at hospital discharge. RESULTS: We analyzed 109 adults (58.7% males; mean age 50.6 ± 17.7) and 111 children (58.6% males; mean age 7.2 ± 4.9). Comparable antecedent infection and immunization incidence in both groups were observed (35.8% vs 45.9%, P > 0.05). Pain and sensory disturbance were the most common onset symptom in adults (57.8%), whereas lower limb weakness predominated in children (61.3%). Ophthalmoplegia (18.3% vs 5.4%), pain, sensory disturbance (85.3% vs 67.6%), ataxia (33.0% vs 15.3%) were more prevalent in adults (P < 0.05). The axonal subtype was prominent in both adults (51.4%) and children (53.2%). Patients were classified into: classic GBS (49.5% and 68.5%), GBS variants (11.0% and 15.3%), classic Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) (1.8% and 1.8%), MFS variants (2.8% and 0%), and GBS/MFS overlap (34.9% and 14.4%). Short-term outcomes did not significantly differ based on age. CONCLUSIONS: Age-related variations in clinical features were observed, but adults and children exhibited similar short-term functional outcomes.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/physiopathologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnostic , Vietnam/épidémiologie , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Enfant , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adolescent , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Jeune adulte , Sujet âgé , Facteurs âges
11.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(8): e76, 2024 Mar 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442719

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were licensed with fast-track procedures. Although these vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity, there has been concerns on the serious adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents. We aimed to analyze comparative safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents. METHODS: In this pharmacovigilance study, we performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report (ICSR) database. To compare serious AEs reported following COVID-19 vaccines vs. all other vaccines in adolescents aged 12-17 years, ICSRs following any vaccines on adolescents aged 12-17 years were included, defining cases as reports with the AEs of interest, with all other AEs as non-cases. The AEs of interest were myocarditis/pericarditis, multisystem inflammatory syndrome/Kawasaki disease (MIS/KD), anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a disproportionality analysis to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each AE of interest, adjusted for sex by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 99,735 AE reports after vaccination in adolescents, 80,018 reports were from COVID-19 vaccinated adolescents (52.9% females; 56.3% America). The AEs of interest were predominantly reported as serious AE (76.1%) with mRNA vaccines (99.4%). Generally, higher reporting odds for the AEs were identified following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents; myocarditis/pericarditis (2,829 reports for the COVID-19 vaccine vs. 35 for all other vaccines, adjusted ROR [aROR], 19.61; 95% CI, 14.05-27.39), and MIS/KD (104 vs. 6, aROR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.89-9.88). The reporting odds for anaphylaxis (515 vs. 165, aROR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02), GBS (94 vs. 40, aROR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.92) and ITP (52 vs. 12, aROR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.09) were not significantly higher following COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: In this study, there were disproportionate reporting of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. While awaiting definitive evidence, there is a need to closely monitor for any signs of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents.


Sujet(s)
Anaphylaxie , Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Maladie de Kawasaki , Myocardite , Péricardite , Purpura thrombopénique idiopathique , Adolescent , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Anaphylaxie/épidémiologie , Anaphylaxie/étiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/étiologie , Pharmacovigilance , Vaccination/effets indésirables
12.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0297902, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381729

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: To properly assess an association between vaccines and specific adverse events requires a comparison between the observed and background rates; however, studies in South Korea are currently limited. Therefore, in this study, we estimated the background incidence of anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and mortality in South Korea. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Sample Cohort (NSC) data. Using NSC, the background incidence rate was estimated by dividing the number of episodes during 2009-2019 by the total population by year and then multiplying by 100,000. Using Statistics Korea data, the background mortality rate was estimated by dividing the number of deaths, during 2009-2019 by the standard population for that year and then multiplying by 100,000. Using background mortality rates, we predicted mortality rates for 2021 using autoregressive integrated moving average models. Further, the expected mortality rates were compared with observed mortality rates. RESULTS: The age-adjusted incidence rate (AIR) of anaphylaxis increased from 4.28 to 22.90 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.003); myocarditis showed no significant increase, changing from 0.56 to 1.26 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.276); pericarditis increased from 0.94 to 1.88 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.005); and GBS increased from 0.78 to 1.21 cases per 100,000 population (p = 0.013). The age-adjusted mortality rate decreased from 645.24 to 475.70 deaths per 100,000 population (p <0.001). The 2021 observed/expected mortality rates for overall (ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.08), men (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.07-1.08), and women (ratio: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.09), were all significantly higher. When stratified by age group, those aged ≥80 (ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.15-1.17), 60-69 (ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.10-1.13), and 20-29 years old (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13) were also significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Through the estimation of background rates related to anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis, GBS, and mortality, we established a reference point for evaluating the potential excess occurrence of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. This reference point serves as substantive evidence supporting the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines.


Sujet(s)
Anaphylaxie , Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Myocardite , Péricardite , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Anaphylaxie/induit chimiquement , Anaphylaxie/épidémiologie , Études de cohortes , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/induit chimiquement , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Incidence , Myocardite/induit chimiquement , Myocardite/épidémiologie , Péricardite/induit chimiquement , Péricardite/épidémiologie , République de Corée/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Vaccination/effets indésirables
13.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 238: 108183, 2024 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401232

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) have been believed to be associated with the novel COVID-19 infection, and also with the following vaccines developed against the infection. Our work aims to investigate the incidence of GBS after COVID-19 vaccination, and describe its clinical characteristics and potential confounders. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted through four databases: PubMed, Scopus, medRxiv, and Google Scholar for all case reports and case series describing after COVID-19 vaccine administration. All published articles from inception until November 1st, 2022 were included. Differences between groups were assessed using Pearson chi-square test. Modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (mEGOS) for the ability to walk after GBS was calculated for all cases with sufficient clinical data, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to study the effect of vaccine type on the relationship between vaccination time and complication of GBS. RESULTS: About 103 studies describing 175 cases of GBS following COVID-19 vaccination were included. The Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy subtype was the most reported subtype with 74 cases (42.29%). The affected age group averaged around 53.59 ±18.83 years, with AMSAN occurring in a rather older group (63.88 ±20.87 years, p=0.049). The AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with AIDP (n=38, 21.71%) more than other vaccines, p=0.02. The bilateral facial palsy subtype was mostly linked to adenoviral vector vaccinations, accounting for an average of 72% of the total BFP cases. Dysesthesias was the most reported sensory complication (60%, p=0.349). Most GBS patients survived (96%, p=0.036), however, most patients had low mEGOS scores (4 ±3.57, p<0.01). On average, patients developed GBS at 13.43 ±11.45 days from vaccination (p=0.73), and survival analysis for complication of GBS into mechanical ventilation or walking impairment yielded a severely increased probability of complication after 25 days (p<0.01). Intravenous immunoglobulins (p=0.03) along with rehabilitation (p=0.19) were the most commonly used treatment. CONCLUSION: This work investigates the incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination. Most cases occurred after receiving the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines, and despite low mortality rates, ambulation was compromised in most patients. A higher risk of GBS complication is associated with an onset later than 12-13 days, particularly with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna vaccines. No specific predisposing or prognostic factor was identified, and the relation between the COVID-19 vaccines and GBS remain unclear.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/étiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Vaccination/effets indésirables , Sujet âgé , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Vaccine ; 42(9): 2200-2211, 2024 Apr 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350768

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The Global COVID Vaccine Safety (GCoVS) Project, established in 2021 under the multinational Global Vaccine Data Network™ (GVDN®), facilitates comprehensive assessment of vaccine safety. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination from 10 sites across eight countries. METHODS: Using a common protocol, this observational cohort study compared observed with expected rates of 13 selected AESI across neurological, haematological, and cardiac outcomes. Expected rates were obtained by participating sites using pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data stratified by age and sex. Observed rates were reported from the same healthcare datasets since COVID-19 vaccination program rollout. AESI occurring up to 42 days following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-vector (ChAdOx1) vaccines were included in the primary analysis. Risks were assessed using observed versus expected (OE) ratios with 95 % confidence intervals. Prioritised potential safety signals were those with lower bound of the 95 % confidence interval (LBCI) greater than 1.5. RESULTS: Participants included 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals. In total, 183,559,462 doses of BNT162b2, 36,178,442 doses of mRNA-1273, and 23,093,399 doses of ChAdOx1 were administered across participating sites in the study period. Risk periods following homologous vaccination schedules contributed 23,168,335 person-years of follow-up. OE ratios with LBCI > 1.5 were observed for Guillain-Barré syndrome (2.49, 95 % CI: 2.15, 2.87) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (3.23, 95 % CI: 2.51, 4.09) following the first dose of ChAdOx1 vaccine. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis showed an OE ratio of 3.78 (95 % CI: 1.52, 7.78) following the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine. The OE ratios for myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 were significantly increased with LBCIs > 1.5. CONCLUSION: This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Myocardite , Péricardite , Thromboses des sinus intracrâniens , Humains , Vaccin ARNm-1273 contre la COVID-19 , Vaccin BNT162 , Études de cohortes , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/induit chimiquement , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Vaccins à ARNm , Vaccination/effets indésirables , Mâle , Femelle
15.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0290879, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241309

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Recently published studies have reported association of COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria) with Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS). Less is known about the safety of other COVID-19 vaccines with respect to GBS outcome. This study investigated the association of COVID-19 vaccines with GBS in more than 15 million persons aged ≥12 years in Italy. METHODS: Study population was all individuals aged ≥12 years who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccines, admitted to emergency care/hospital for GBS from 27 December 2020-30 September 2021 in Italy. Identification of GBS cases and receipt of at least one dose of mRNA-1273 (Elasomeran), BNT162b2 (Tozinameran), ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) through record linkage between regional health care and vaccination registries. Relative Incidence (RI) was estimated Self-controlled case series method adapted to event-dependent exposure using in the 42-day exposure risk period after each dose compared with other observation periods. RESULTS: Increased risk of GBS was found after first (RI = 6.83; 95% CI 2.14-21.85) and second dose (RI = 7.41; 2.35-23.38) of mRNA-1273 and first dose of ChAdOx1-S (RI = 6.52; 2.88-14.77). Analysis by age found an increased risk among those aged≥60 years after first (RI = 8.03; 2.08-31.03) and second dose (RI = 7.71; 2.38-24.97) of mRNA-1273. The first dose of ChAdOx1-S was associated with GBS in those aged 40-59 (RI = 4.50; 1.37-14.79) and in those aged ≥ 60 years (RI = 6.84; 2.56-18.28). CONCLUSIONS: mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1-S vaccines were associated with an increased risk of GBS however this risk resulted in a small number of excess cases. Limitations were loss of GBS outpatient cases and imprecision of the estimates in the subgroup analysis due to a low number of events.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , Vaccin ARNm-1273 contre la COVID-19 , Ad26COVS1 , Vaccin BNT162 , Vaccin ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/complications , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/étiologie , Italie/épidémiologie , Vaccination/effets indésirables , Surveillance post-commercialisation des produits de santé
16.
Neuropediatrics ; 55(2): 112-116, 2024 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253279

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: The risk factors for respiratory insufficiency in children with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) are poorly known. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with respiratory insufficiency in children with GBS. METHODS: This retrospective study included children diagnosed with GBS by pediatric neurologists and admitted at the Wuhan Children's Hospital and other hospitals from January 2013 to October 2022. The patients were divided into the respiratory insufficiency and nonrespiratory insufficiency groups according to whether they received assist breathing during treatment. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age of onset of 103 patients were 5 (3.1-8.5) years, 69 (67%) were male, and 64 (62.1%) had a history of precursor infection. Compared with the nonrespiratory insufficiency group, the respiratory insufficiency group showed more facial and/or bulbar weakness (p = 0.002), a higher Hughes Functional Grading Scale (HFGS) at admission (p < 0.001), and a shorter onset-to-admission interval (p = 0.017). Compared with the acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) subtype, the acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) subtype showed longer days from onset to lumbar (p = 0.000), lower HFGS at admission (p = 0.04), longer onset-to-admission interval (p = 0.001), and more cranial nerve involvement (p = 0.04). The incidence of respiratory insufficiency between AIDP and AMAN showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, facial and/or bulbar weakness, HFGS at admission, and onset-to-admission interval were associated with respiratory insufficiency and might be useful prognostic markers in children with GBS.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Insuffisance respiratoire , Enfant , Humains , Mâle , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/complications , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnostic , Études rétrospectives , Hospitalisation , Insuffisance respiratoire/épidémiologie , Insuffisance respiratoire/étiologie , Amantadine
17.
J Neurol ; 271(3): 1063-1071, 2024 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233678

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Case-reports/series and cohorts of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of GBS after COVID-19 vaccination was carried out. Incidence and incidence rate ratio for a number of vaccine doses and risk of GBS, also considering the specific vaccine technology, were calculated in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 554 citations retrieved, 518 were discarded as irrelevant. We finally included 15 studies. The random effect model yielded, regardless of the vaccine technology, 1.25 (95%CI 0.21; 2.83) GBS cases per million of COVID-19 vaccine doses, 3.93 (2.54; 5.54) cases per million doses for adenovirus-vectored vaccines and 0.69 (0.38; 1.06) cases per million doses for mRNA vaccines. The GBS risk was 2.6 times increased with the first dose. Regardless of the vaccine technology, the GBS risk was not increased but disaggregating the data it was 2.37 (1.67; 3.36) times increased for adenovirus-vectored vaccines and 0.32 (0.23; 0.47) for mRNA vaccines. Mortality for GBS after vaccination was 0.10 per million doses and 4.6 per GBS cases. CONCLUSIONS: Adenovirus-vectored vaccines showed a 2.4 times increased risk of GBS that was about seven times higher compared with mRNA-based vaccines. The decreased GBS risk associated with mRNA vaccines was possibly due to an elicited reduction of infections, including SARS-CoV-2, associated with GBS during the vaccination period. How adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines may trigger GBS is unclear and further studies should investigate the relationship between vaccine technologies and GBS risk.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/complications , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/induit chimiquement , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Vaccins à ARNm/administration et posologie , Vaccins à ARNm/effets indésirables , Vaccination/effets indésirables
18.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(2): e16094, 2024 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823707

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association between Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is debated. This study reappraises, after three pandemic years, the epidemiological data and the features of GBS in SARS-CoV-2 patients. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports/series and cohort studies published between 1 January 2020 and 19 April 2023 was performed. RESULTS: In all, 209 case reports/series (304 patients) and 26 cohort studies were included. The risk of GBS in northern Italy during the first pandemic wave was 2.85 times increased (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54; 5.25) whereas in some countries the risk during the first pandemic year was 0.17 times reduced (risk ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75; 0.93). The incidence of GBS in SARS-CoV-2 Italian hospitalized cohorts was 8.55 per 1000 (95% CI 5.33; 12.49) with an estimated incidence of 0.13 GBS per 1000 in the SARS-CoV-2 infected population. In European cohorts the pooled rate of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 61.3% of the total. GBS patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection showed more frequently, but not differently from non-infected patients, the classical clinical presentation and the demyelinating subtype. Cranial nerves were more frequently involved in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: An increased risk of GBS occurred in northern Italy during early COVID-19 pandemic. The recognition of the 'Italian factor' reconciles contrasting results of the epidemiological studies. The slightly reduced GBS risk in other countries and the relatively high frequency of GBS associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection can be explained by the adopted health measures that decreased the circulation of other GBS infective antecedents.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/épidémiologie , SARS-CoV-2 , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/étiologie , Pandémies , Italie/épidémiologie
19.
Vaccine ; 42(1): 4-7, 2024 Jan 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044244

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: To address the lack of an active vaccine safety surveillance system in Japan, the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety (VENUS) study was initiated in 2021 as a pilot system using existing health insurance claims data and vaccination records. METHODS: This study evaluated the value of the VENUS study by assessing the incidence of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following vaccination with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) design. RESULTS: Incidence rate ratios for ITP during 28-day and 42-day risk periods were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-6.4), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.081-4.2), respectively. Neither was statistically significant. Incidence rate ratios could not be estimated for GBS due to the limited sample size. CONCLUSION: The VENUS study can provide valuable insights to facilitate the establishment of an advanced vaccine monitoring system in Japan.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Vaccins antipneumococciques , Purpura thrombopénique idiopathique , Humains , Anticorps antibactériens , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/induit chimiquement , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Japon/épidémiologie , Infections à pneumocoques/prévention et contrôle , Vaccins antipneumococciques/effets indésirables , Polyosides , Purpura thrombopénique idiopathique/induit chimiquement , Purpura thrombopénique idiopathique/épidémiologie , Vaccination/effets indésirables ,
20.
Am J Emerg Med ; 75: 90-97, 2024 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925758

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare but serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of GBS, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence. DISCUSSION: GBS is a rare immune-mediated neurologic disorder with peripheral nerve injury. It most commonly presents weeks after a bacterial or viral infection, though there are a variety of associated inciting events. The diagnosis is challenging and often subtle, as only 25-30% of patients are diagnosed on their initial healthcare visit. Clinicians should consider GBS in patients with progressive ascending weakness involving the lower extremities associated with hyporeflexia, but the cranial nerves, respiratory system, and autonomic system may be involved. While the ED diagnosis should be based on clinical assessment, further evaluation includes laboratory testing, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and potentially neuroimaging. Not all patients demonstrate albumino-cytological dissociation on CSF testing. Several criteria exist to assist with diagnosis, including the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke criteria and the Brighton criteria. Management focuses first on assessment of the patient's hemodynamic and respiratory status, which may require emergent intervention. Significant fluctuations in heart rate and blood pressure may occur, and respiratory muscle weakness may result in the need for airway protection. Neurology consultation is recommended, and definitive treatment includes PLEX or IVIG. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of GBS can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.


Sujet(s)
Syndrome de Guillain-Barré , Humains , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnostic , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/épidémiologie , Syndrome de Guillain-Barré/thérapie , Prévalence , Faiblesse musculaire
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE