Evaluation of Primary and Recurrent Breast Cancer after Giving Adjuvant Therapy in Correlation with the Receptor Status.

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women. The molecular subtypes of breast cancer, depending on the Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER-2) status, usually play a vital role for the adjuvant treatment. Interestingly, there is a good possibility of change of receptor status in the recurrence of same primary tumor. The study is designed April 2018 to March 2019 to see the concordance in triple-receptor expression (ER, PR, and HER-2) between the primary and the locally recurrent breast cancer patient and the results can be able to influence the management and prognosis of the breast cancer patients. This observational study was carried out in the department of surgical oncology, NICRH where total 48 patients were studied who were subjected to core biopsy of recurrent lesion for ER, PR and HER-2 status. A structured case record form was used to interview and collect data. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 26.0 to see concordance and discordance in triple-receptor expression between the primary and the locally recurrent breast cancer patient. Among 48 cases, 12(25.0%), 10(20.83%) and 2(4.16%) patients showed Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (Her-2) discordance that are statistically significant in every receptor status. Majority discordance of ER, PR and Her-2 were associated with invasive duct cell carcinoma (IDC); ER & Her-2 discordance was equally associated with histological grade 2 and 3 whereas PR discordance had significant association with grade 3. Staging of disease showed that all ER, PR and Her-2 discordance were associated with stage (p<0.05). Besides, majority discordance was mostly associated with lumpectomy except Her-2 discordance. Besides, among the adjuvant treatment regimen chemotherapy along with radiotherapy was mostly associated with discordance of all receptors (p<0.05). Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER-2) status of primary breast cancer showed 25.0%, 20.83% and 4.16% discordant in recurrent episodes in this study. Invasive duct cell carcinoma, histological grade 2 and 3, stage II, stage III, MRM and CT along with RT are major attributable factors in this study.

[Retrospective analysis of metaplastic breast cancer cases]. / A metaplasztikus emlodaganat retrospektív elemzése.

Metaplastic breast tumour is a rare, aggressive, mostly triple- negative, dedifferentiated malignancy, which poorly responds to chemotherapy compared to other invasive breast tumours. Since 2000, the WHO has considered it as a separate entity among breast tumours. Given the extremely poor prognosis of the tumour, more studies are needed to establish the most effective treatment strategy supported by data to increase overall survival. The objective of our research was a retrospective analysis of 77 patients with metaplastic breast cancer treated between 01.01.2012 and 28.02.2023 at our institute. Following the descriptive statistics of the patients, the pathological or clinical response was examined in cases of 15 patients treated with neoadjuvant and 14 patients with palliative chemotherapy. Finally, we compared the overall and progression-free survival of metaplastic breast cancer patients treated at our institute with those described in the international literature. The research results, both at our institute and in the literature, are limited by the small number of cases. In our research, with similar numbers of cases as many other investigations, we obtained results close to international data, thereby supporting the collection of data and further research necessary for the most effective treatment strategy for this rare tumour.

[Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer].

Surgical resection of a primary tumor is the only effective curative treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer without a distant metastasis. Nevertheless, most patients eventually develop postoperative recurrence caused by micrometastases. The risk increases if a complete resection is not achieved. Three surgical stages have emerged for a preoperative assessment based on resectability: resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable. Although controversial, considerable research has focused on the role of neoadjuvant therapy in all forms of potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. While upfront surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, there is growing evidence that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival without increasing the resection rate in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This review describes the current treatment strategies for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and summarizes the results of the latest clinical trials.

[Current Status of Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: Updated Treatment Strategies].

Colorectal cancer remains a significant health burden in South Korea, being the third most diagnosed cancer in the country. Despite advances in treatment, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer still face limited survival rates, with resection often deemed impossible for the majority. This review discusses the current state of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer treatment, focusing on both adjuvant chemotherapy post-surgery and palliative chemotherapy for metastatic cases. The article highlights recent updates in treatment guidelines, including the use of immunotherapy and the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in personalized medicine. The integration of these novel approaches aims to enhance treatment efficacy, improve patient survival, and reduce recurrence rates, paving the way for more tailored and effective therapeutic strategies in colorectal cancer management.

Navigating precision: the crucial role of next-generation sequencing recurrence risk assessment in tailoring adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor Receptor2-negative early breast cancer.

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype, representing over two-thirds of new diagnoses. Adjuvant therapy, which encompasses various medications and treatment durations, is the standard approach for managing early stage HR+ HER2- breast cancer. Optimizing treatment is essential to minimize unnecessary side effects while addressing the biological variability inherent in HR+/HER2- breast cancers. Incorporating biological biomarkers into treatment decisions, alongside traditional clinical factors, is vital. Gene expression assays can identify patients unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, thereby refining treatment strategies and improving risk assessment. This paper reviews evidence for several genomic tests, including Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Breast Cancer Index, RucurIndex, and EndoPredict, which assist in tailoring adjuvant therapy. Additionally, we explore the role of liquid biopsies in personalizing treatment, emphasizing the importance of considering late relapse risks and potential benefits of extended systemic therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis of different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma achieving pathological complete response through neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic differences following the achievement of a pathological complete response (pCR) through neoadjuvant chemotherapy across different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) were identified for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy who achieved pathological complete response for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast between 2010 and 2019.Comparing the clinicopathological characteristics of patients across different molecular subtypes. Univariate and Cox multivariate analyses were utilized to identify independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The Kaplan-Meier method is used to compare OS and CSS among different molecular subtypes. After propensity score matching, subgroup analysis results were presented through forest plots. RESULTS: This study included 9,380 patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma, who were categorized into four molecular subtypes: 2,721 (29.01%) HR + /HER-2 + , 1,661 (17.71%) HR + /HER2-, 2,082 (22.20%) HR-/HER2 + , and 2,916 (31.08%) HR-/HER-2-. HR + /HER-2- subgroup exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients under 50 years old than the other subtype groups (54.67% vs 40.2%, 50.35% and 51.82%, p < 0.01), and had a higher N2 + N3 stage (11.2% vs 7.24%, 8.69% and 7.48%, p < 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that molecular subtype was the independent risk factor for OS and CSS in patients(p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the HR + /HER-2 + subtype had the highest OS and CSS(p < 0.05). Next, were the HR-/HER-2 + and HR-/HER-2- subtypes, with the HR + /HER-2- group having the lowest OS and CSS(p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, the OS and CSS of patients in the HR + /HER-2 + group remained higher compared to HR + /HER-2- group(p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of different molecular subtypes exhibit varying prognoses after achieving pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Those in the HR + /HER-2- group are younger, have a higher lymph node stage, and the lowest OS and CSS, whereas patients in the HR + /HER-2 + group have the highest OS and CSS.

Fertility-sparing surgical interventions for low-risk, non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: The primary treatment approach for addressing low-risk nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-NMGTN) in women desiring fertility preservation involves chemotherapy. An alternative option for treatment is fertility-sparing surgical interventions, either alone or in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy. The hypothesised advantages of choosing fertility-sparing surgery in cases of LR-NMGTN include potential avoidance of adverse effects associated with chemotherapy, potential reduction in the number of chemotherapy cycles required to achieve complete remission, and potential reduction in time to remission. OBJECTIVES: To measure the benefits and harms of fertility-sparing surgical interventions, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to primary chemotherapy alone, for the treatment of women with low-risk, non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-NMGTN). SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP on 31 January 2024. We also searched abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fertility-sparing surgical interventions, with or without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy, versus primary chemotherapy as standard care for the treatment of women with LR-NMGTN. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We employed standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome, if available. We focused on the following outcomes: treatment success rate, relapse, disease-specific mortality, death due to treatment, pregnancy rate, quality of life, and any adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We included two RCTs, with a total of 151 participants contributing data to our analyses. Both studies used uterine curettage as the fertility-sparing surgical intervention. Fertility-sparing surgical intervention without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy versus primary chemotherapy alone One RCT involving 62 participants with varying hCG (human chorionic gonadotrophin) levels evaluated this comparison. Most of our outcomes of interest were not measured in this study. The relative risk of experiencing any adverse event could not be estimated as chemotherapy adverse effects were not reported. The study reported that there were no surgical complications. Chemotherapy was administered to 50% of participants in the intervention group after curettage because their hCG levels increased. Fertility-sparing surgical intervention with subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy versus primary chemotherapy alone One RCT involving 89 participants with hCG levels < 5000 IU/L evaluated this comparison. We judged the risk of bias in the study to be high. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of uterine curettage with subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy on treatment success rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to1.23; 86 participants), relapse (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.31; 86 participants), pregnancy rate (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.34; 86 participants), and rate of adverse events (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.13; 86 participants), all very low certainty evidence. The relative risks of disease-specific mortality and death due to treatment could not be estimated as there were no deaths in either group. There were no results for quality of life as this outcome was not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Uterine curettage is the only fertility-sparing surgical intervention for LR-NMGTN that has been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. The evidence is very uncertain about the benefits and harms of uterine curettage, with or without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to primary chemotherapy alone. The two available studies are small with a high risk of bias, and future research may find substantially different results for all reported outcomes. Larger RCTs, with appropriate clinical outcome measures, would be required to determine the benefits or harms of fertility-sparing surgical interventions for this population.

Determining the optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Studies on several malignancies have suggested that the time to commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is associated with survival outcomes. There have, however, been no relevant reports of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This clinical study examined newly diagnosed patients between April 2017 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control for confounding factors. Cox models with restricted cubic splines, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the relationship between AC timing and survival. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients were identified [median age, 45 years (interquartile range 36-52 years); 383 (69.5%) male]. Restricted cubic splines demonstrated that the timing of AC initiation had a U-shaped association with PFS. The risk of disease progression decreased within 37 days and subsequently increased. From 37 to 90 days, each additional 7-day delay conferred worse PFS of 1.32 months {hazard ratio (HR): 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.28], P = 0.04}. The cut-off value of the receiver operating characteristic curve for initiation was 69.5 days. At a median follow-up of 48 months, the PFS was significantly better in patients initiated within 69.5 days [HR: 2.18 (95% CI 1.17-4.06), log-rank P = 0.009], with a higher 3-year rate [78.8% (95% CI 75.1% to 82.7%) versus 59.0% (95% CI 42.2% to 82.5%)] than beyond 69.5 days. Positive results were also observed in secondary endpoints. The initiation group was an independent prognostic factor [HR: 2.28 (95% CI 1.42-3.66), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing of AC initiation is ∼37 days after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A delay beyond 69.5 days is associated with compromised survival. Efforts should be made to address the reasons for delays and ensure the timely initiation of AC.

Survival following adjuvant trastuzumab-based treatment among older patients with HER2-positive early invasive breast cancer: A national population-based cohort study using routine data.

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported adjuvant trastuzumab-based treatment improved overall survival (OS) among patients with HER2-positive early invasive breast cancer (EIBC). Few RCTs included older patients or those with comorbidity/frailty. This study aimed to determine whether the effect of adjuvant trastuzumab-based treatment on survival outcomes varies by patient age and fitness, using national data from routine care. METHODS: Women (50+ years) newly-diagnosed with HER2-positive EIBC between 2014 and 2019 were identified from England Cancer Registry data. Registration records were linked to Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data for treatment details and ONS death register for mortality details. A propensity score analysis employing the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to balance the patient variables across treatment groups. Cox models were used to evaluate whether the effect of treatment on OS was associated with patient age and fitness; competing risks regression models were used for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: 5238 women initiated adjuvant trastuzumab-based treatment. Median follow-up was 56.7 months. Comparison with 3421 women who did not receive adjuvant trastuzumab highlighted differences at diagnosis in relation to age, fitness, grade, nodal involvement, surgery type and use of radiotherapy. Weighted survival analysis found trastuzumab was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio HR 0.56, 95 %CI: 0.45-0.70) and improved BCSS (subHR 0.62, 95 %CI: 0.47-0.82). We found no evidence of a difference in effect by age or patient fitness for either outcome. CONCLUSION: In this national dataset, adjuvant trastuzumab was associated with improvements in survival, with an OS effect size similar to RCT evidence. The effect size was not found to vary by patient age or fitness. Chronological age and fitness alone should not be barriers to receipt of effective adjuvant targeted treatment.

Clinicopathological Review of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected 30 patients with HNSCC who had undergone radical resection after NAC. We pathologically evaluated the therapeutic response to NAC, and classified the residual tumor patterns. In addition, we compared the maximum horizontal diameter on pathology with imaging. RESULTS: The residual patterns were categorized as follows: 10 cases of shrunken type, 11 cases of mixed type, and seven cases of fragmented type. The majority of underestimation cases - those cases in which the maximum horizontal diameter measured on post-NAC imaging was less than the pathological size after resection - were multifocal residual lesions, with a tendency for more frequent "positive" or "close" surgical margins. CONCLUSION: The strategy of performing NAC to reduce resection volume is not appropriate, and resection margins should be based on the assessment before NAC.

Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer Is Related to the Continuation of S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although perioperative chemotherapy has improved patient survival, sarcopenia may occur during chemotherapy owing to decreased food intake and physical strength. However, reports on the occurrence of sarcopenia and changes in body composition in patients with pancreatic cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy are scarce. This study aimed to determine the effect of changes in skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy clinical course in patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and surgical resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 159 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection, followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We evaluated changes in skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using abdominal computed tomography and the SliceOmatic software. The association between the rate of change in skeletal muscle mass index (Δ%SMI) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was investigated. RESULTS: Eighty-eight (55.3%) patients lost skeletal muscle mass (Δ%SMI <0) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a significantly low S-1 adjuvant completion rate (p=0.02). Δ%SMI <0 was an independent risk factor for the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio=1.924, 95% confidence interval=1.002-3.695, p=0.049). Moreover, the lower the Δ%SMI, the lower the S-1 continuation rate (p=0.022). CONCLUSION: Loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer affected the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatic resection. Therefore, ameliorating loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be carefully considered to improve the continuation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Seven-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in stage III melanoma in the EORTC1325 / KEYNOTE-054 trial.

In the previously reported primary analyses of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) than placebo in patients with resected high risk stage III melanoma. Stability of these benefits when the median follow-up was 3.5 and 5 years was published. Here we report results with a longer follow-up. METHODS: We randomized 1019 patients to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses. RFS in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with melanoma positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) were co-primary endpoints. DMFS in these two populations was a secondary and progression/recurrence-free survival 2 (PRFS2) an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.9 years. In the overall intention-to-treat population, RFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.53 to 0.74). RFS at 7 years was 50 % (95 % CI 46 % to 55 %) in the pembrolizumab and 36 % (95 % CI 32 % to 41 %) in the placebo group. Positive effects were present both for loco-regional recurrences and distant metastases, and across substages IIIA-IIIB-IIIC, and PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative as well as for BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type populations. DMFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.54 to 0.76). DMFS at 7 years was 54 % (95 % CI 50 % to 59 %) in the pembrolizumab and 42 % (95 % CI 37 % to 46 %) in the placebo group. PRFS2 was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.57 to 0.84). PRFS2 at 7 years was 61 % (95 % CI 57 % to 66 %) in the pembrolizumab and 53 % (95 % CI 49 % to 57 %) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-year analysis of adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a sustained improvement in the long-term RFS, DMFS and PRFS2 compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-671): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: At the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-671 trial, adding perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved event-free survival in participants with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report overall survival and health-related quality of life outcomes from the second interim analysis. METHODS: KEYNOTE-671 was a global phase 3 trial done at 189 medical centres. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to four cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or to four cycles of neoadjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks). Randomisation was done centrally using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by disease stage, PD-L1 expression, histology, and geographical region in blocks of four. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments; local pharmacists were unmasked to support treatment preparation. The dual primary endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03425643, and is ongoing but closed to enrolment. FINDINGS: Between May 11, 2018, and Dec 15, 2021, 797 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=397) or the placebo group (n=400). Median study follow-up at the second interim analysis was 36·6 months (IQR 27·6-47·8). 36-month overall survival estimates were 71% (95% CI 66-76) in the pembrolizumab group and 64% (58-69) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·93]; one-sided p=0·0052; threshold, one-sided p=0·0054). Median event-free survival was 47·2 months (95% CI 32·9 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 18·3 months (14·8-22·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·59 [95% CI 0·48-0·72]). In the as-treated population, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 179 (45%) of 396 participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 151 (38%) of 399 participants in the placebo group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) participants in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: The significant overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone coupled with a manageable safety profile support the use of perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bile duct: Case report of surgical treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy of 2 cases.

RATIONALE: Neuroendocrine carcinoma originating from extrahepatic bile duct is very rare, and only a few cases have been reported. Because of its scarcity of incidence, not much is known about the disease but for its aggressiveness and poor prognosis. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this report, we present 2 cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) originating from extrahepatic bile duct. Case 1: a 60-year-old woman presented with jaundice but no abdominal pain. Case 2: a 67-year-old man also presented with jaundice, along with abdominal discomfort and appetite loss. DIAGNOSES: Case 1: LCNEC with a focal adenocarcinoma component (pT2aN1M0, pStage IIIB). Case 2: LCNEC with a focal adenocarcinoma component (pT1N1M0, pStage IIB). INTERVENTIONS: Case 1: the patient underwent left hepatectomy and caudatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy, followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin). Case 2: the patient underwent laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin). OUTCOMES: Case 1: liver metastasis was detected 6 months postoperatively, and despite multiple chemotherapy regimens, the patient died 24 months post-surgery. Case 2: liver metastasis was detected 23 months postoperatively. The patient is still alive 36 months post-surgery after receiving multiple chemotherapy regimens and radiotherapy. LESSONS: Given the rarity of LCNEC, it is essential to continue collecting and reporting additional case studies to build a more comprehensive understanding of the disease. Although the prognosis for LCNEC is generally poor, the use of a multidisciplinary approach and further research will be critical in developing more effective treatment strategies in the future.