Early versus delayed lower extremity amputations caused by firearm injury: A minimum 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: High-energy casualties such as firearm injuries may result in extensive loss of soft tissue and bone in the lower extremities. Although the primary aim in these types of injuries is the preservation of the extremity, repeated surgical procedures for extremity salvage and subsequent restoration of function could have detrimental effects on the patient both physically and psychologically. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the physical and psychological outcomes of patients who underwent lower extremity amputation in the early period after a firearm injury compared with the results of patients who underwent amputation in the late period. We also evaluated the factors affecting the prognosis in patients undergoing late below-knee amputation (BKA). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent BKA following a lower extremity injury caused by firearms between March 2016 and March 2022. Patients who underwent emergency BKA at the first center they were taken to immediately after the injury constituted the early amputation (EA) group. Patients who were transferred to our tertiary-level referral center for continuation of treatment after the first intervention at another center and later underwent BKA constituted the late amputation (LA) group. The patients were evaluated regarding age, gender, amputation side, presence of phantom limb pain (PLP), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). RESULTS: Information was available from hospital records for a total of 35 patients; 16 in the EA group and 19 in the LA group. All patients were male. The mean age at the time of injury was 25.5±5.3 years (range, 20-45 years), and the mean follow-up period was 37±17 months (range, 25-84 months). In the comparison of PLP experienced, the difference between the groups was statistically significant, with PLP experienced by 1 (10%) patient in the EA group and by 9 (90%) in the LA group (p=0.010). PTSD was diagnosed in 3 (23%) patients in the EA group and 10 (77%) patients in the LA group (p=0.039). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent late BKA were found to be affected by PLP and PTSD at a higher rate. When deciding on extremity-preserving surgery for patients with severe open injuries to the lower extremity, it is crucial to consider the poor outcomes associated with late BKA. Patients should be thoroughly informed about these negative outcomes.

Analysis of compartment syndromes in lower extremity pediatric and adolescent trauma - are there predictors of a late onset?

INTRODUCTION: Purpose of the study was to answer the question, if there are common fracture or injury characteristics, which help to identify patient at risk for a secondary compartment syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2022 all children and adolescents who were treated for a traumatic compartment syndrome in a lower extremity were retrospectively evaluated. Patient's demographics were recorded, the underlying trauma mechanism identified. Fractures were classified, treatment and complications were analyzed. We differentiated two groups of patients (early onset vs. late onset) and compared trauma mechanism, fracture location, classification and treatment between those two entities. RESULTS: Our collective consisted of 56 children and adolescents with 67 compartment syndromes, with an average age of 14.1 years (5-17). 41 (73.2 %) of the patients were male and 15 (26.8 %) female. Most people in our sample had previously been involved in traffic accidents (64.3 %), with the most common mechanism of injury being "motorbike accident" (34.3 %) and "pedestrian/cyclist accident against car" (26.9 %). There was an accumulation of fractures of the lower leg, in particular tibial shaft fractures (AO 42 and 43A; 49.3 %). In our survey, dislocated fractures and fractures of the foot always led to an early onset of compartment syndrome. The tibial shaft fracture and the surgical treatment with intramedullary nailing showed a significant frequency in the late onset group. CONCLUSIONS: Special attention should be paid to pediatric and adolescent patients with tibial shaft fracture and surgical treatment with intramedullary nailing in order to detect and treat a possible late onset of a compartment syndrome at an early stage.

[Traumatic hemipelvectomy : An uncommon case in trauma surgery]. / Traumatische Hemipelvektomie : Ein nichtalltäglicher Fall in der Unfallchirurgie.

The challenge in treating traumatic hemipelvectomy is the dynamics of the complex and life-threatening consequences of the injury. These include skin and soft tissue defects, osseous, neural and vascular injuries as well as the subsequent hemostatic derangement and organ dysfunction as part of the shock process. The treatment requires rapid and targeted decisions to save the patient's life. In this particular case a 34-year-old farmer was trapped between a wheeled loader and a stationary trailer. Upon arrival at the hospital the patient was in a state of hemorrhagic shock with accompanying acute traumatic coagulopathy and a grade III open pelvic trauma with complete ischemia of the left leg and a bladder injury. After performing emergency surgery and a two-stage approach for pelvic stabilization the patient's condition deteriorated up to multiorgan failure, necessitating left-sided hemipelvectomy as an immediate life-saving salvage procedure. In the further course multiple revision surgeries and plastic reconstructions due to wound infections and the presence of skin and soft tissue damage were required. Due to the rare confrontation with this type of injury in everyday practice and the absence of a universal treatment algorithm, the following case report is intended to contribute to a better understanding of the treatment and to illustrate the coherent interactions of the individual organ systems affected.

Locoregional Flap Reconstruction of the Distal Third of the Leg - What Role Does it Have in a Modern Reconstructive Algorithm?

ABSTRACT: Reconstruction of traumatic defects of the lower third of the leg poses a challenge due to limited locoregional options. Failed coverage can be associated with prolonged hospital stay, infection, loss of function, and unplanned return to surgery. Over the last few decades, free tissue transfer has dominated reconstructive algorithms for such defects; however, locoregional flaps may provide equally effective coverage in select patients. In the wake of the CODID-19 pandemic, locoregional flaps gained more consideration due to limited resources. We present a literature review and discussion of locoregional flaps, with emphasis on the quality and efficacy of these reconstructive modalities compared with free tissue transfer and surgical indications.Soleus flaps, reverse sural flaps, and cutaneous perforator-based flaps are workhorses for small to medium size defects of the distal third of the leg, even in the setting of concomitant orthopedic trauma and exposed vital structures. It is important to consider such alternatives an integral part of the reconstructive algorithm as they can provide durable coverage with a favorable complication profile with less resource utilization. Appropriate patient selection requires consideration of the character of the defect, smoking status, preexisting vascular disease, and the zone of injury.

The use of peroneus brevis in lower limb reconstruction-What we have learned from 49 cases.

INTRODUCTION: There are many suitable techniques for the treatment of soft tissue defects of the lower limb. Older subjects often with multiple comorbidities, presenting with a laterally located and complex defect, can be challenging to treat. This cohort are often unsuited to long procedures or multi-stage reconstruction and so one is faced with a paucity of options. In such instances, we use the peroneus brevis (PB) muscle flap as a single stage procedure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study evaluating the use of PB flaps in lower limb injury. Subjects were collated using a database and multiple variables were assessed including: patient demographics, comorbidities, defect size, peri-operative timings, time in theatre, use of inotropes / blood transfusion, mean hospital stay, patient morbidity / mortality, flap survival. RESULTS: During 2015-2023, 49 patients underwent lower limb reconstruction using PB muscle flaps. 42 cases involved PB and skin graft alone whilst seven were more complex requiring additional local and free tissue techniques. The most common indication (n = 28) was infection after closed fracture fixation, followed by open trauma (n = 21). Median patient age was 59 (20-93 years), and ASA grade 3. Median defect size was 4 × 7 cm (2-18 cm) and time from admission to definitive closure 4 days (0-21 days) with median time in theatre 120 min (45-520 min). 17 patients required inotropes and 13 had blood transfusion. Median length of hospital stay was 12 days (0-58 days), one patient (aged 90) died. 100 % of flaps survived and median Enneking score was 65. Heterotopic ossification was not identified in the post-operative imaging within the first year. DISCUSSION: Our experience highlights the benefits and risks of using the PB flap and advocates it as a reliable, cost-effective, 1-stage technique for reconstructing small lateral defects in the distal third of the lower limb.

Cross-leg flaps: A nonmicrosurgical alternative treatment method in complex lower extremity trauma reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to present our experiences with cross-leg flap surgery, which demonstrates successful outcomes in lower limb soft tissue defects without the necessity of microsurgical intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 26 patients (18 males, 8 females; mean age: 35.6±12.2 years; range, 18 to 65 years) between January 2015 and September 2019. A fasciocutaneous cross-leg flap was applied to the recipient extremity, and the extremities were immobilized by a tubular external fixator. Flap divisions were performed on the 21st postoperative day. At least two years of clinical outcomes were presented. RESULTS: Twenty-five flaps survived and recovered completely without any complication at the donor site, flaps, or the recipient area. In one diabetic patient, partial flap loss was encountered, which granulated with secondary healing. All patients demonstrated stable wound coverage, with none demanding additional soft tissue surgeries. All patients resumed normal ambulation and physical activity without any residual joint stiffness. CONCLUSION: Cross-leg flap method is an effective and respectable option for extremity salvage as a good alternative to free flaps for the management of traumatic complex lower limb defects. This method is simple, provides abundant blood supply to the wound, and does not require microsurgical experience or a good working recipient artery.

Propeller vs. free fasciocutaneous flap in reconstruction of complex lower limb defects-A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Of all body regions, lower extremity wounds have been and remain the greatest challenge. Free flaps have been accepted as a reasonable option to solve this dilemma, but they require the complexity of microsurgery. This study aimed to compare the postoperative and clinical outcomes of propeller flap and fasciocutaneous free flap in the reconstruction of complex lower limb defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from July 2021 to June 2023. Selected patients were randomized into two groups: the propeller flap group and fasciocutaneous free flap group. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, and postoperative parameter, including esthetic analysis, scar assessment, neurosensory analysis, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity function, were estimated and statistically significant compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: Road traffic accident (73.3%) was the most common etiology for lower limb defects in both groups. The foot and lower third of the leg were the most common site of defect, constituting 79.99%. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in propeller flap as compared to fasciocutaneous free flaps. Flap size was smaller, with better neurosensory improvements in propeller flap group. Esthetic analysis, scar assessment, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity functional analysis yielded similar results in both study groups. CONCLUSION: Propeller flap has better outcomes compared to free flap in terms of smaller size of flap, shorter duration of surgery, and reduced length of hospital stay. Comparable results were obtained with respect to esthetic score, scar assessment score, psychosocial analysis, and neurosensory recovery and lower extremity functional score.

Comparison of single and double incision leg fasciotomy in disaster settings-Experience from 2023 Türkiye earthquakes.

INTRODUCTION: Although there are studies comparing methods for leg fasciotomy in compartment syndrome after fractures, choice of single or double fasciotomies in disasters was not investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of single and double incision leg fasciotomy in the setting of disaster. METHODS: Patients that have undergone fasciotomy after 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were separated into two groups as single incision and double incision according to the method of the first fasciotomy. The number of debridements after each fasciotomy, muscle group excisions, completion time of treatment, presence of amputation, the method of closure (primary closure or graft/flap) and positive results of wound cultures were analyzed and compared between two groups. RESULTS: 62 legs of 52 patients (22 females, 30 males, age 36.9 ± 11.2 years) with compartment syndrome that have undergone fasciotomy after 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes were included in the study. Single-incision group included 27 legs and double incision group included 35 legs. Amputation was needed in 15 patients (%24.2), six in single incision group and nine in double incision group. (p = 0.75). Compartment excision (eight patients in single incision, nine patients in double incision groups, p = 0.81), number of debridements (median 4 in both groups, p = 0.55), wound closure time (median 17 days in single incision, 22 days in double incision groups, p = 0.52), graft or flap requirement (11 patients in single incision, 16 patients in double incision groups, p = 0.53), positive culture results (15 patients in single incision, 16 patients in double incision groups, p = 0.44) were not different statistically between two groups. CONCLUSION: Single and double incision fasciotomy methods are equally effective and safe in treatment of compartment syndrome of the leg in disaster situations. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing outcomes of single and double incision fasciotomy in disaster settings.

Prevalence of chronic pain after severe lower limb injury (SLLI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Globally, severe lower limb injuries (SLLIs) are the predominant cause of long-term injury related disability and poor functional outcomes. Chronic pain is a major source of this morbidity, but the magnitude of the contribution is not clearly understood. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of chronic pain following SLLIs in civilian and military patients. METHOD: This systematic review was prospectively registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with study ID CRD42022313615. A systematic literature search (Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Web of Science) was performed to identify original studies that reported chronic pain outcomes for adults who underwent surgical treatment for SLLIs in a civilian or military setting. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool, and quality assessment was reported at study level using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and at outcome-level using the GRADE framework. Absolute (proportional) and relative (odds ratio) outcome measures were calculated and pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Forty-three studies reporting the outcomes of 5601 patients were included. Estimated overall prevalence of pain was 63 % (CI 55-70 %). The prevalence of chronic pain in amputees (64 % (CI 55-73 %)) was similar to those who underwent limb salvage (56 % (CI 44-67 %)). The prevalence of chronic pain in civilian populations was 70 % (CI 63-77 %) compared to military populations (51 % (CI 35-66 %)). In amputees, the prevalence of residual limb pain was similar to phantom limb pain (OR 1.06 [0.64-1.78], p = 0.81, I2 = 92 %). CONCLUSION: Most people who sustain a SLLI will suffer from chronic pain. Healthcare systems must continue to research interventions that can reduce the incidence and severity of long-term pain and ensure adequate resources are allocated for this common and debilitating complication.

Urinary bladder matrix versus dermal regeneration template for lower extremity wound coverage.

PURPOSE: To compare dermal regenerative template (DRT), with and without split-thickness skin-grafting (STSG), and urinary bladder matrix (UBM) for coverage of lower extremity wounds. METHODS: A retrospective review of 56 lower extremity wounds treated with either DRT and STSG (DRT-S) (n = 18), DRT only (n = 17), or UBM only (n = 21). Patient characteristics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, injury characteristics, wound characteristics, use of negative pressure wound therapy, surgical details, postoperative care, and failure of primary wound coverage procedure were documented. RESULTS: The DRT group, compared to the DRT-S group, was older [median difference (MD) 17.4 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-25.7; p = 0.0008], more diabetic (proportional difference (PD) 54.2%, CI 21.2-76.1%; p = 0.002), had smaller wounds (MD - 91.0 cm2, CI - 125.0 to - 38.0; p = 0.0008), more infected wounds (PD 49.0%, CI 16.1-71.7%; p = 0.009), a shorter length of stay after coverage (MD - 5.0 days, CI - 29.0 to - 1.0; p = 0.005), and no difference in primary wound coverage failure (41.2% vs. 55.6%; p = 0.50). The UBM group, compared to the DRT group, was younger (MD - 6.8 years; CI - 13.5 to - 0.1; p = 0.04), had fewer patients with an ASA > 2 (PD - 35.0%, CI - 55.2% to - 7.0%; p = 0.02), diabetes (PD - 49.2%, CI - 72.4% to - 17.6%; p = 0.003), and had no difference in primary wound coverage failure (36.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 1.0). Failure of primary wound coverage was found to only be associated with larger wound surface areas (MD 22.0 cm2, CI 4.0-90.0; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DRT and UBM coverage had similar rates of primary wound coverage failure for lower extremity wounds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.

Do Transtibial Amputations Outperform Amputations of the Hind- and Midfoot Following Severe Limb Trauma?: A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 18-month clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients with severe lower-limb injuries treated with a transtibial amputation or a hind- or midfoot amputation. Despite the theoretical benefits of hind- and midfoot-level amputation, we hypothesized that patients with transtibial amputations would report better function and have fewer complications. METHODS: The study included patients 18 to 60 years of age who were treated with a transtibial amputation (n = 77) or a distal amputation (n = 17) and who were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Foot Trauma (OUTLET) study. The primary outcome was the difference in Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, and secondary outcomes included pain, complications, amputation revision, and amputation healing. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients with distal versus transtibial amputation in any of the domains of the SMFA: dysfunction index [distal versus transtibial], 31.2 versus 22.3 (p = 0.13); daily activities, 37.3 versus 26.0 (p = 0.17); emotional status, 41.4 versus 29.3 (p = 0.07); mobility, 36.5 versus 27.8 (p = 0.20); and bother index, 34.4 versus 23.6 (p = 0.14). Rates of complications requiring revision were higher for distal amputations but not significantly so (23.5% versus 13.3%; p = 0.28). One distal and no transtibial amputees required revision to a higher level (p = 0.18). A higher proportion of patients with distal compared with transtibial amputation required local surgical revision (17.7% versus 13.3%; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the distal and transtibial groups in scores on the Brief Pain Index at 18 months post-injury. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complication rates did not differ significantly between patients who underwent transtibial versus hind- or midfoot amputation for severe lower-extremity injury. The average SMFA scores were higher (worse), although not significantly different, for patients undergoing distal compared with transtibial amputation, and more patients with distal amputation had a complication requiring surgical revision. Of note, more patients with distal amputation required closure with an atypical flap, which likely contributed to less favorable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Quality of Life After Lower Leg Reconstruction With the Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: The latissimus dorsi free flap is a widely used reconstructive technique for complex lower leg defects in the pediatric population due to its reliability and anatomical features. However, the impact of this technique on the postoperative quality of life in children and adolescents, who require appropriate lower extremity function during their developmental period, remains to be analyzed. METHODS: Patients who underwent microsurgical lower leg reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi flap were analyzed retrospectively. The quality of life of these patients was assessed prospectively using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) at a minimum of 18 months after surgical reconstruction. RESULTS: Sixteen pediatric patients who had severe lower extremity injuries and underwent latissimus dorsi free flap reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 33.9 months (22-64 months). Two patients experienced postoperative complications: one had partial flap necrosis and surgical site infection, while the other developed a surgical site infection. The LEFS scores ranged from 26 to 80, with a mean score of 64.6. Remarkably, 14 of 16 patients achieved LEFS scores consistent with at least the 10th percentile when compared with normative data. Patients with severe associated fractures presented with the lowest scores. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, the latissimus dorsi flap is reaffirmed to be an excellent choice for lower leg reconstruction in the pediatric population. It effectively restores the quality of life in patients who have experienced moderate to severe lower extremity injuries.

Does the type of lower extremity fracture affect long-term opioid usage? A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION:  Patients recovering from musculoskeletal trauma have a heightened risk of opioid dependence and misuse, as these medications are typically required for pain management. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the association between fracture type and chronic opioid use following fracture fixation in patients who sustain lower extremity trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed using PubMed and Web of Science to identify articles reporting chronic opioid use in patients recovering from surgery for lower extremity fractures. 732 articles were identified using keyword and MeSH search functions, and 9 met selection criteria. Studies were included in the final analysis if they reported the number of patients who remained on opioids 6 months after surgery for a specific lower extremity fracture (chronic usage). Logistic regressions and descriptive analyses were performed to determine the rate of chronic opioid use within each fracture type and if age, year, country of origin of study, or pre-admission opioid use influenced chronic opioid use following surgery. RESULTS: Bicondylar and unicondylar tibial-plateau fractures had the largest percentage of patients that become chronic opioid users (29.7-35.2%), followed by hip (27.8%), ankle (19.7%), femoral-shaft (18.5%), pilon (17.2%), tibial-shaft (13.8%), and simple ankle fractures (2.8-4.7%).Most opioid-naive samples had significantly lower rates of chronic opioid use after surgery (2-9%, 95% CI) when compared to samples that allowed pre-admission opioid use (13-50%, 95% CI). There were no significant associations between post-operative chronic opioid use and age, year, or country of origin of study. CONCLUSIONS:  Patients with lower extremity fractures have substantial risk of becoming chronic opioid users. Even the lowest rates of chronic opioid use identified in this meta-analysis are higher than those in the general population. It is important that orthopedic surgeons tailor pain-management protocols to decrease opioid usage after lower extremity trauma.

Mental health is strongly associated with capability after lower extremity injury treated with free flap limb salvage or amputation.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about factors associated with long-term outcomes, after severe traumatic injury to the lower extremity, can aid with the difficult decision whether to salvage or amputate the leg and improve outcome. We therefore studied factors independently associated with capability at a minimum of 1 year after amputation or free flap limb salvage. METHODS: We included 135 subjects with a free flap lower extremity reconstruction and 41 subjects with amputation, between 1991 and 2021 at two urban-level 1 trauma centers with a mean follow-up of 11 ± 7 years. Long-term physical functioning was assessed using the Physical Component Score (PCS) of the Short-Form 36 (SF36) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaires. Independent variables included demographics, injury characteristics, and the Mental Component Score (MCS) of the SF36. RESULTS: Greater mental health was independently and strongly associated with greater capability, independent of amputation or limb reconstruction. Mental health explained 33% of the variation in PCS and 57% of the variation in LEFS. Injury location at the knee or leg was associated with greater capability, compared to the foot or ankle. Amputation or limb reconstruction was not associated with capability. DISCUSSION: This study adds to the growing body of knowledge that physical health is best regarded through the lens of the bio-psycho-social model in which mental health is a strong determinant. This study supports making mental health an important aspect of rehabilitation after major lower extremity injury, regardless of amputation or limb salvage.