A critical analysis of debates on grief and depressive disorder in the age of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. / Un análisis crítico de los debates acerca del duelo y el trastorno depresivo en la era del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales.

Since the incorporation of the major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) in 1980, and until its update in the DSM-IV-TR, the DSM classification system considered it necessary to include the criterion of "bereavement exclusion", with the aim of differentiating normal sadness linked to a loss, from a mental disorder, such as the major depressive disorder. In its latest version (DSM-5), this exception was removed, giving rise to a controversy that continues to this day. The debate has set those who are in favor of maintaining this exclusion and extending it to other stressors against those who have intended to eradicate it. Our hypothesis is that these positions account for two qualitatively diverse clinical and epistemological matrices, linked to major transformations in health sciences and in psychiatry. We show that this debate involved a profound renewal of the meaning of psychiatric practice, a change in the function of diagnosis and in the way of conceiving the etiology of mental disorders, as well as a reformulation of the patient's suffering status for the medical act.

Desde la incorporación del trastorno depresivo mayor en el Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) de 1980, hasta su actualización en el DSM-IV-TR, el sistema clasificatorio DSM consideró necesario incluir el criterio de "exclusión por duelo", con el objetivo de diferenciar la tristeza normal, vinculada a una pérdida, de un trastorno mental, como el trastorno depresivo mayor. En su última versión (DSM-5), esta excepción fue suprimida, dando lugar a una controversia que se extiende hasta nuestros días. El debate ha confrontado a quienes están a favor de mantener y extender la exclusión a otros estresores y aquellos que han querido erradicarla. Nuestra hipótesis es que estas posiciones darían cuenta de dos matrices clínicas y epistemológicas cualitativamente diversas ligadas a las trasformaciones mayores que han experimentado las ciencias de la salud y la psiquiatría. Mostramos que este debate involucró una renovación profunda del sentido de la práctica psiquiátrica, un cambio en la función del diagnóstico y el modo de concebir la etiología de la enfermedad mental, así como, una reformulación del estatuto del sufrimiento del paciente para el acto médico.

Un análisis crítico de los debates acerca del duelo y el trastorno depresivo en la era del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales / A critical analysis of debates on grief and depressive disorder in the age of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

RESUMEN Desde la incorporación del trastorno depresivo mayor en el Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) de 1980, hasta su actualización en el DSM-IV-TR, el sistema clasificatorio DSM consideró necesario incluir el criterio de "exclusión por duelo", con el objetivo de diferenciar la tristeza normal, vinculada a una pérdida, de un trastorno mental, como el trastorno depresivo mayor. En su última versión (DSM-5), esta excepción fue suprimida, dando lugar a una controversia que se extiende hasta nuestros días. El debate ha confrontado a quienes están a favor de mantener y extender la exclusión a otros estresores y aquellos que han querido erradicarla. Nuestra hipótesis es que estas posiciones darían cuenta de dos matrices clínicas y epistemológicas cualitativamente diversas ligadas a las trasformaciones mayores que han experimentado las ciencias de la salud y la psiquiatría. Mostramos que este debate involucró una renovación profunda del sentido de la práctica psiquiátrica, un cambio en la función del diagnóstico y el modo de concebir la etiología de la enfermedad mental, así como, una reformulación del estatuto del sufrimiento del paciente para el acto médico.

ABSTRACT Since the incorporation of the major depressive disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) in 1980, and until its update in the DSM-IV-TR, the DSM classification system considered it necessary to include the criterion of "bereavement exclusion", with the aim of differentiating normal sadness linked to a loss, from a mental disorder, such as the major depressive disorder. In its latest version (DSM-5), this exception was removed, giving rise to a controversy that continues to this day. The debate has set those who are in favor of maintaining this exclusion and extending it to other stressors against those who have intended to eradicate it. Our hypothesis is that these positions account for two qualitatively diverse clinical and epistemological matrices, linked to major transformations in health sciences and in psychiatry. We show that this debate involved a profound renewal of the meaning of psychiatric practice, a change in the function of diagnosis and in the way of conceiving the etiology of mental disorders, as well as a reformulation of the patient's suffering status for the medical act.

A latent genetic subtype of major depression identified by whole-exome genotyping data in a Mexican-American cohort.

Identifying data-driven subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) is an important topic of psychiatric research. Currently, MDD subtypes are based on clinically defined depression symptom patterns. Although a few data-driven attempts have been made to identify more homogenous subgroups within MDD, other studies have not focused on using human genetic data for MDD subtyping. Here we used a computational strategy to identify MDD subtypes based on single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping data from MDD cases and controls using Hamming distance and cluster analysis. We examined a cohort of Mexican-American participants from Los Angeles, including MDD patients (n=203) and healthy controls (n=196). The results in cluster trees indicate that a significant latent subtype exists in the Mexican-American MDD group. The individuals in this hidden subtype have increased common genetic substrates related to major depression and they also have more anxiety and less middle insomnia, depersonalization and derealisation, and paranoid symptoms. Advances in this line of research to validate this strategy in other patient groups of different ethnicities will have the potential to eventually be translated to clinical practice, with the tantalising possibility that in the future it may be possible to refine MDD diagnosis based on genetic data.

The joint structure of major depression, anxiety disorders, and trait negative affect

Background: Dimensional models of psychopathology demonstrate that two correlated factors of fear and distress account for the covariation among depressive and anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, these models tend to exclude variables relevant to psychopathology, such as temperament traits. This study examined the joint structure of DSM-IV-based major depression and anxiety disorders along with trait negative affect in a representative sample of adult individuals residing in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: The sample consisted of 3,728 individuals who were administered sections D (phobic, anxiety and panic disorders) and E (depressive disorders) of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.1 and a validated version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Data were analyzed using correlational and structural equation modeling. Results: Lifetime prevalence ranged from 2.4% for panic disorder to 23.2% for major depression. Most target variables were moderately correlated. A two-factor model specifying correlated fear and distress factors was retained and confirmed for models including only diagnostic variables and diagnostic variables along with trait negative affect. Conclusions: This study provides support for characterization of internalizing psychopathology and trait negative affect in terms of correlated dimensions of distress and fear. These results have potential implications for psychiatric taxonomy and for understanding the relationship between temperament and psychopathology. .

The joint structure of major depression, anxiety disorders, and trait negative affect.

BACKGROUND: Dimensional models of psychopathology demonstrate that two correlated factors of fear and distress account for the covariation among depressive and anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, these models tend to exclude variables relevant to psychopathology, such as temperament traits. This study examined the joint structure of DSM-IV-based major depression and anxiety disorders along with trait negative affect in a representative sample of adult individuals residing in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3,728 individuals who were administered sections D (phobic, anxiety and panic disorders) and E (depressive disorders) of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.1 and a validated version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Data were analyzed using correlational and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence ranged from 2.4% for panic disorder to 23.2% for major depression. Most target variables were moderately correlated. A two-factor model specifying correlated fear and distress factors was retained and confirmed for models including only diagnostic variables and diagnostic variables along with trait negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for characterization of internalizing psychopathology and trait negative affect in terms of correlated dimensions of distress and fear. These results have potential implications for psychiatric taxonomy and for understanding the relationship between temperament and psychopathology.

Major depressive disorder symptoms in male and female young adults.

This research aimed to compare the prevalence rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) and to differentiate the presence and severity of depressive symptoms between women and men aged 18-24 years. In this population-based, cross-sectional study (n = 1560), young adults were screened with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for MDD (n = 137). Participants then completed a self-report questionnaire to gather sociodemographic data, and the presence of each symptom of depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory. The proportion of women (12.2%) with MDD was higher than that of men (5.3%). The symptoms of depression found to be significantly more prevalent in women were sadness, crying, difficulty making decisions, and lack of energy, as well as self-criticism, irritability, changes in self-image, work difficulty, and loss of interest in sex. Sadness and self-criticism were significantly more severe in women than in men. The presentation of depressive symptoms in young adults with MDD differed between men and women.

Is poststroke depression a major depression?

BACKGROUND: Poststroke depression (PSD) is the most common neuropsychiatric consequence of stroke. A large number of studies have focused on the pathogenesis of PSD, but only a few aimed to characterize its psychopathology; these studies yielded results that are difficult to compare because of the different methods utilized. The current study aimed to characterize the symptom profile of PSD in an attempt to better understand the disease and allow a more accurate diagnosis. METHODS: The study sample comprised 64 patients divided into three groups: stroke patients without diagnosis of depression (n = 33), stroke patients diagnosed with PSD (PSD group, n = 14) and patients diagnosed with major depression (MD) but with no clinical comorbidity (MD group, n = 17). All patients were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). The initial diagnostic interview was complemented by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Rankin Scale, and four scales for the assessment of the intensity of symptoms of anxiety and depression: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression General Scale (HADS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). The Star Plot, a graphical method of data visualization, was used to analyze the results. The t test was used for independent samples (two-tailed analysis). RESULTS: As measured by the BDI, HAM-D and HAM-A scales and HADS depression subscale, the average total scores of symptoms for the sample of patients diagnosed with MD without clinical comorbidity was significantly higher than that of the PSD patients (p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained by plotting the BDI data on Star Plot. The PSD patients showed mild typical depressive symptoms such as less depressed mood, anhedonia, disinterest, guilt, negative thoughts, depreciation, suicidal ideation and anxiety, when evaluated by the HAM-A scale. Moreover, the somatic symptoms of depression did not lead to increased diagnosis of major depression in stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the PSD clinical picture comprised, in general, symptoms of mild/moderate intensity, especially those considered as pillars for the diagnosis of depression: depressed mood, loss of pleasure and lack of interest. Given the imprecision of boundaries that separate the clinical forms of depression from subclinical and nonpathological forms, or even from the concepts of demoralization and adjustment disorders, we situate PSD in a complex biopsychosocial context in which a better understanding of its psychopathological profile could provide diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives best suited to the difficult reality experienced by stroke patients.

Clinical differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression as defined by the CORE system.

BACKGROUND: The definition and delineation of melancholia have remained elusive for an extended period. A longstanding signal of psychomotor disturbance has been operationalized via the observer-rated CORE measure and with CORE-assigned melancholic and nonmelancholic compared in several Australian studies. Replication studies in other regions have not previously been reported. This study compares Brazilian patients with melancholic and nonmelancholic depression according to the CORE measure of psychomotor disturbance in terms of clinical characteristics, suicide ideation, stressful life events, quality of life, parental care, and personality styles. METHODS: A total of 181 patients with unipolar major depression attending a tertiary care outpatient service in Brazil were evaluated in relation to melancholic status and study variables. RESULTS: The CORE-assigned melancholic patients presented higher symptom severity, greater prevalence of suicide ideation, and Axis I comorbidities than nonmelancholics. Scores of dysfunctional personality styles and dysfunctional parental care measures were also higher among melancholics. Quality-of-life scores were low in both groups. LIMITATIONS: The absence of a criterion standard for the diagnosis of melancholia and the use of medication can be potential limitations of the study. CONCLUSION: Differences suggest that CORE-assigned melancholia defines a distinct group of patients and probably a disorder distinct from nonmelancholic depression not only in quantitative but also in qualitative aspects.

Clinical manifestations of geriatric depression in a memory clinic: toward a proposed subtyping of geriatric depression.

BACKGROUND: As the older population increases so does the number of older psychiatric patients. Elderly psychiatric patients manifest certain specific and unique characteristics. Different subtypes of depressive syndromes exist in late-life depression, and many of these are associated with cognitive impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 109 depressive patients and 30 normal subjects matched by age and educational level were evaluated using a neuropsychiatric interview and an extensive neuropsychological battery. Depressive patients were classified into four different groups by SCAN 2.1 (schedules for clinical assessment in Neuropsychiatry): major depression disorder (n: 34), dysthymia disorder (n: 29), subsyndromal depression (n: 28), and depression due to mild dementia of Alzheimer's type (n: 18). RESULTS: We found significant associations (p<.05) between depressive status and demographic or clinical factors that include marital status (OR: 3.4, CI: 1.2-9.6), level of daily activity (OR: 5.3, CI: 2-14), heart disease (OR: 12.5, CI: 1.6-96.3), and high blood cholesterol levels (p:.032). Neuropsychological differences were observed among the four depressive groups and also between depressive patients and controls. Significant differences were observed in daily life activities and caregivers' burden between depressive patients and normal subjects. CONCLUSION: Geriatric depression is associated with heart disease, high cholesterol blood levels, marital status, and daily inactivity. Different subtypes of geriatric depression have particular clinical features, such as cognitive profiles, daily life activities, and caregivers' burden, that can help to differentiate among them. LIMITATIONS: The cohort referred to a memory clinic with memory complaints is a biased sample, and the results cannot be generalized to other non-memory symptomatic cohorts.

Hyperthymic temperament may protect against suicidal ideation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of hyperthymic temperament in suicidal ideation between a sample of patients with affective disorders (unipolar and bipolar). METHOD: We investigated affective disorders outpatients (unipolar, bipolar I, II and NOS) treated in eleven participating centres during at least a six-month period. DSM-IV diagnosis was made by psychiatrists experienced in mood disorders, using the corresponding modules of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). In addition, bipolar NOS diagnoses were extended by guidelines for bipolar spectrum symptoms as proposed by Akiskal and Pinto in 1999. Thereby we also identified NOS III (switch by antidepressants) and NOS IV (hyperthymic temperament) bipolar subtypes. All patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). We screened a total sample of 411 patients (69% bipolar), 352 completed all the clinical scales without missing any item. RESULTS: No statistical significant difference in suicidal ideation (measure by BDI item 9 responses) was found between bipolar and unipolar patients (4.5% vs. 9.1%, respectively). On the group of bipolar patients, suicidal ideation was slightly more frequent among bipolar NOS compared with bipolar I and II (p value 0.094 and 0.086, respectively), interestingly we found a statistical significant less common suicidal ideation among bipolar subtype IV (with hyperthymic temperament) compared with bipolar NOS patients (p value 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that those subjects with hyperthymic temperament displayed less suicidal ideation. This finding supports the hypothesis that this particular affective temperament could be a protective factor against suicide among affective patients. LIMITATION: The original objective of the national study was the cross validation between MDQ and BSDS in patients with affective disorders in our country. This report arises from a secondary analysis of the original data.

[Major depression invites major concerns]. / Depressão maior suscita questionamento maior.

OBJECTIVE: To overview limitations to the concept and construct of major depression. METHOD: The objectives in initially conceptualizing major depression are examined against its subsequent utility and relevance to clinicians and researchers. RESULTS: It is argued that, as defined, major depression does not differentiate clinical depression well from expressions of non-clinical depression or sadness, that its criteria set do not generate reliable diagnoses, that a diagnosis of major depression means little in and of itself (as it effectively comprises multiple types of depression) and that it fails to inform us about cause, natural history or differential treatment response. CONCLUSION: Limitations to the concept of major depression would benefit from wider appreciation to advance changes to the clinical diagnosis of depressive sub-types.

Depressão maior suscita questionamento maior / Major depression invites major concerns

OBJETIVO: Revisar as limitações do conceito e do construto da depressão maior. MÉTODO: Os objetivos na conceitualização inicial da depressão maior são examinados em relação à sua subseqüente utilidade e relevância para os clínicos e pesquisadores. RESULTADOS: Afirma-se que, como definida, a depressão maior não diferencia bem a depressão clínica das expressões de depressão não clínica ou de tristeza; que seu conjunto de critérios não gera diagnósticos confiáveis; que um diagnóstico da depressão maior pouco significa por si só (na medida em que compreende efetivamente múltiplos tipos de depressão); e não nos informa sobre a causa, histórico natural ou resposta diferenciada ao tratamento. CONCLUSÃO: As limitações do conceito de depressão maior poderiam se beneficiar de uma avaliação mais ampla para impulsionar alterações no diagnóstico clínico dos subtipos depressivos.

OBJECTIVE: To overview limitations to the concept and construct of major depression. METHOD: The objectives in initially conceptualizing major depression are examined against its subsequent utility and relevance to clinicians and researchers. RESULTS: It is argued that, as defined, major depression does not differentiate clinical depression well from expressions of non-clinical depression or sadness, that its criteria set do not generate reliable diagnoses, that a diagnosis of major depression means little in and of itself (as it effectively comprises multiple types of depression) and that it fails to inform us about cause, natural history or differential treatment response. CONCLUSION: Limitations to the concept of major depression would benefit from wider appreciation to advance changes to the clinical diagnosis of depressive sub-types.

Temperament in the clinical differentiation of depressed bipolar and unipolar major depressive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in temperament profiles between patients with recurrent unipolar and bipolar depression. METHOD: Depressed individuals with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 94) and those with bipolar (n = 59) disorders (about equally divided between types I and II) were recruited by newspaper advertisement, radio and television announcements, flyers and newsletters, and word of mouth. All patients were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM III-R (SCID) and had the severity of their depressive episode assessed by means of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. All patients filled out the TEMPS-A, a validated instrument. RESULTS: Temperament differences between bipolar and MDD patients were examined using MANCOVA. Overall significant effect of the fixed factor (bipolar vs. unipolar) was noted for the temperament scores [Hotelling's F((5,142)) = 2.47, p < 0.05]. Overall effects were found for age [F((5,142)) = 2.40, p < 0.05], but not for gender and severity of depression [F((5,142)) = 1.65, p = 0.15 and F((5,142)) = 0.66, p = 0.66, respectively]. Dependent variables included the five subscales of the TEMPS-A, but only the cyclothymic temperament scores showed significant between-group differences. LIMITATION: Small bipolar subsample cell sizes did not permit to test the specificity of the findings for bipolar II vs. bipolar I patients. CONCLUSION: The finding that the clyclothymic subscale is significantly elevated in the bipolar vs. the unipolar depressive group supports the theoretical assumptions upon which the scale is based, and suggests that it might become a useful tool for clinical and research purposes.

Sintomas alucinatórios persistentes: uma discussäo nosológica e Psicopatológica / Persistent Hallucinatory Symptoms: a nosological and psochopathological discussion

Os autores apresentam um caso de psicose de evoluçäo cronica marcado por sintomas alucinatórios persistentes. Discutem a classificaçäo nosológica do caso fazendo referencias a quadros clínicos classicos. Finalmente, fazem breve revisäo sobre a psicopatologia das alucinaçöes

Controversias acerca de la nosología de los trastornos delirantes paranoides / Controversies about nosology of delusional paranoid disorders

La existencia de pacientes con ideas delirantes persistentes, no bizarras, no atribuibles a otro trastorno mental, plantea una serie de interrogantes. Kraepelin distinguió dos entidades dentro de este grupo, la paranoia y la parafrenia, incluyéndolas dentro de las psicosis endógenas. Desde entonces ha existido una permanente controversia acerca de la atribución nosológica. Algunos autores plantean que se trata de formas moderadas de esquizofrenia. Otros afirman que es un subtipo de enfermedad afectiva. Un tercer punto de vista, coincidente con Kraepelin, considera que se trata de psicosis independientes. Actualmente predomina la idea de que es una categoria separada, aunque los fundamentos derivan de un número limitado de estudios. El DSM-III-R y la CIE-10 incluyen estos cuadros dentro de una nueva categoría diagnóstica los trastornos delirantes (paranoides). No obstante, los criterios diagnósticos difieren entre ambos sistemas nosológicos y entre estos y sus predecesores, el DSM-III y la CIE-9. Se requieren más investigaciones rigurosas para establecer mejor la legitimidad y los límites de estas entidad o grupo de entidades nosológicas